Dark Secret Sen. Dianne Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed
so let's start with first of all the this Daxing suspect found late last
night in the congressional office of a member for whom he didn't work also
affiliated with Feinstein affiliated with Feinstein and in daxing history oh
yeah so he basically broke into the office he stole files he's apparently
very familiar with computer technology that's what he did is sending out
information sending out information so he basically stole information senators
addresses telephone numbers sent it out over the Internet of course he was
discovered he was an intern for Sheila jackson-lee
he is in huge trouble Sean he is facing a criminal felony and prison time for
this I know that Joe and I was outraged it's outrageous and it's showing you how
far the left has gone the giving out home address is now senators how
dangerous is this people can show up at their homes we don't know what dangerous
people are out there and I think the American people are starting to see
right now how terrible and how dangerous this has
become basically to the fundamentals of our Constitution and to our own life and
safety and Liberty job they got worse they're worse now than ever they're loco
but that's okay just being a democratic intern allegedly posting the personal
information of at least three Republican senators online happened during last
week's Cavanaugh hearing Fox News learned police that are now
investigating leads to more incidents one of them targeting Senator Rand Paul
jason Chaffetz former US congressman Fox News contributor how you doing good
morning to you house it into morning this 27 year old Jackson Costco how does
that happen it doesn't make sense because an unpaid intern working for
three different senators doesn't smell right on the surface but what's
fascinating about this case is there are seven different charges everything from
identity theft second-degree burglary witness tampering
where does witness tampering come into this this is more than just stealing you
know Senator Mike Lee's personal information and posting it up to
Wikipedia there's something more here well
don't get it did the intern get the information or did someone give it to
him there's your question well again I'm looking at the charges
just like everybody else but it sounds a little bit more sophisticated in the
fact that how quickly they chart arrested this person in charged this
person and again with seven different charges out there at burglary those
types of things it really does make it sound like it's a bit more sophisticated
and widespread because now you see Senator Rand Paul is also having issues
don't know if it's tied to this particular case but that would make at
least for Senator okay well I have no say I'm the lead Democrat but the
Republicans control so this is all up to the Republican side okay and I think
it's really too bad that no one called her or called her lawyer my
understanding is she got emails and this is a woman and I really believe who's
been profoundly impacted by this no I can't say everything's truthful I don't
know but I do know that you had to contact her lawyers was it communicated
to you by your counsel or someone else that the committee had asked to
interview you and that they offered to come out to California to do so I say do
you mind if I say something to you directly you know um I just appreciate
that you did offer that I wasn't clear on what the offer was if you were gonna
come out to see me I would have happily hosted you and had to had been happy to
speak with you out there I just did not I wasn't clear to me that that was the
case okay does that take care of your question yes thank you mr. cherry after
you sent your letter did you or anyone on your behalf speak to senator
Feinstein personally or with any Senate staffer yes okay I had a phone call with
senator Feinstein okay and when was that that was while I was still in Delaware
so before August 7th okay and how many times did you speak with
senator Feinstein once okay what did you talk about as she asked me some
questions about the incident and I
answered those questions okay was that the extent of the gist of the
conversation yes it was a fairly brief calm phone call okay
did you ever give senator Feinstein or anyone else the permission to release
that letter not that I know of between the letter date July 30th and August the
7th did you speak with any other person about your allegations could you say the
dates again between the letter date of July 30th and August 7th so while you
were still in Delaware did you speak with any other person about your
allegations I'm just trying to remember what dates that stop - you're asking her
with the owners they don't have any lawyers octavo I've spoken with correct
correct correct I think correct then I was interviewing lawyers but I'm not
okay speaking personally about it aside from lawyers that you were seeking
to possibly hire to represent you did you speak to anybody else about it
during that period of time no okay I was staying with my parents at the time did
you talk to them about it definitely not okay
so would it be fair to say that you retained counsel during that time period
of July 30th to August 7th I can't remember the exact date but it was the I
was interviewing lawyers during that period of time sitting in the car in the
driveway and in the Walgreens parking lot and we're hope it's Delaware and
trying to figure out how the whole system works of interviewing lawyers and
how to pick one etc so and I know she did not want
that's why I didn't make the letter public because I couldn't be assured
okay of what would happen and unfortunately that was taken out of my
control let me be clear I did not hide dr. Ford's allegations I did not leak
her story she asked me to hold it confidential and I kept it confidential
as she asked she apparently was stalked by the press felt that what happened she
was forced to come forward and her greatest fear were realized was realized
she's been harassed she's had death threats and she's had to flee her home
in addition the investigation that the Republican majority is heralding is
really nothing that I know about other than a partisan practice normally all
the witnesses would be interviewed however that's not happened while the
majority has reached out to several people they did not notify me or my
staff that they were doing this and so ought to argue that we would not
participate but not tell us what they were up to is somewhat disingenuous I
was given some information by a woman who was very much afraid who asked that
it be held confidential and I held it confidential until she decided that she
would come forward it's my understanding that her story was leaked before the
letter became public and she testified that she had spoken to her friends about
it and it's most likely that that's how the story leaked and that she had been
asked by press but it did not leak from us I assure you of that
almost mr. chairman I'm I'm a little confused I thought only the member of
the House and senator Feinstein and her lawyers had the letter so her friends
she might have talked to about it couldn't leak the letter if they just
had a book verbal conversation unless she
that my copy of the letter a senator I don't think the letter was ever leaked
well how how did the press know to contact her about her complaint she
apparently she testified here this morning that she had talked to friends
about it and that press had talked to her about Dianne Feinstein knew about
this two months earlier if she wanted a really thorough investigation we had all
the time in the world she didn't have to wait till after the hearing was closed
essentially she should have said listen I have a problem I have this report I'd
like the FBI to look at it while we're doing the earrings we had two months no
she didn't do that she waited till we would closed and then she probably
leaked it but you know Who am I to say but she probably leaked it based on a
very bad body language the other day but more importantly in a sense for her to
have waited that period of time and now for you Democrats and I guess I'm
including you to the media right I consider you a part of the Democrat
Party but for you for the Democrats to be talking about we want more time for
the FBI if you wanted more time for the FBI
why didn't Dianne Feinstein bring this up now you know that she showed this to
other Democrats she's not the only one she showed this to other Democrats there
were more than just her that knew about this big confidential thing it was
confidential until the hearing was over after the hearing was over they went
public why didn't they do it during the hearing and we could have had all the
time in the world you know why because they're dishonest people because this
remains a confidential part of the background report I hope that changes
are made and we'll be able to talk more about what the FBI did later but what I
can say is that the most notable part of this report is what's not in it as we
noted by the White House the FBI did not Brett Kavanaugh nor did the FBI
interview dr. Blasi Ford what we've heard from numerous people over the last
few days seeking to provide information to the FBI we have seen even more press
reports of witnesses who wanted to speak with the FBI
but were not interviewed Debra ramirez's lawyers said he was unaware of any
corroborating witnesses who were interviewed candidly what we reviewed
today in a very limited time I was there I had to leave that report is in part
and I had the opportunity to read some but not all of it it looks to be a
product of an incomplete investigation that was limited perhaps by the White
House I don't know but the White House certainly blocked access to millions of
documents from Judge Cavanaugh's record I know that and ensured that 90% of his
emails and memos weren't available for the Senate or the public in the hearings
it now appears that they also blocked the FBI from doing its job Democrats
agreed that the investigation scope should be limited we did not agree that
the White House should tie the FBI's hands it's simply not credible to say
that public testimony in last week's hearing is a substitute for interviews
by FBI agents not only two senators lack the expertise of FBI agents we were only
given five minutes to question Judge Cavanaugh so in my view from what I saw
the investigation was very limited and it will be interesting after all of the
members have an opportunity to read the documents and we have an opportunity in
public to discuss our conclusions what I'm sorry Thank You senator Feinstein I
just have three points to make one we had many fears that this was a very
limited process that would constrain the FBI from getting all the facts having
received a thorough briefing on the documents those fears have been realized
second I disagree having received this the briefing on all of the documents I
disagree with Senator Grassley's statement that there was no hint of
misconduct and third we are reiterating our call given how limited this these
documents were and how limited the scope of this investigation was we are
reiterating our call that the documents with proper redaction be made public
why shouldn't all of America see the facts and second we are reiterating our
call to make the directive that the White House and Council magan sent to
the FBI public because we believe it greatly
constrained the investigation from the get-go the fact that there's only one
document in there for a hundred senators is another example of constraining the
ability of all senators and the American public to see the whole truth and
nothing but a charge made or said to have occurred 36 years ago and nothing
happened since then and look I feel badly for all parties I feel badly for
everybody I feel badly for our country this is so bad for our country but I
will tell you I watched those senators on the Democrat side and I thought it
was a disgrace and partially because I know them I know them too well and you
know what they are not angels thank you god bless you and God bless america
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét