Presenter: By the way, here is another piece of international news. How would you comment on the latest
prank performed by Vovan and Lexus, who called to the US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley?
Valeriy Pyakin: It's very serious. I have already said several times that such call [is not so easy to make]. Remember,
when Vovan and Lexus were just starting their "naughty tricks" affair, I said that it had not been clear for whom they had worked.
There is no doubt that supranational management backs them. But whom do they represent: the United States or the Global predictor?
And it became clear long ago that Vovan and Lexus worked in the name of the Global predictor.
But
then they got to the leadership of the United States.
And
the question arose,
[try] always to ask questions:
[can just anyone find] the phone of an official of this level in a telephone directory?
Can you imagine what the approval procedure is prior to a person takes a receiver and starts to talk to anyone?
He will be absolutely sure that he is going to talk to that specific person.
Some Ukrainian prankers tried and played a trick on Solovyov. Their pathetic attempts were just ridiculous.
They really believe that a telephone number can be found in a telephone directory. One can just call anyone and act as anyone.
In fact, this is very serious work [guided] from the supranational level.
And Nikki Haley was certainly confident that she was talking to the person named to her, i.e., to the Prime Minister of Poland.
So no wonder that she spoke within the appropriate algorithmics.
[She was] following the pattern that she got used to [in official talks]; typically someone might call from Poland and ask:
"Would you tell me, what kind of foreign policy we should carry out?" For her, this is common and normal.
They know perfectly well that Poland has no foreign policy of its own.
That Poland is headed by Kozyrev [type of politicians], [who] call and ask: "Tell me, what opinion should we have on such an issue?"
What should we do? What decisions to take?"
And she worked according to this scheme.
When
Jen Psaki was [a representative of the US State Department] she was constantly reprimanded. I constantly defended her. I always said:
"Her only fault is that she happened to be a press secretary at the period when the United States are being regularly "humiliated".
Accordingly, it became possible to take the [US] spokesman's blunders public, to present them to the public outwardly as they are.
That's her only fault".
She is produced by the American system of education.
And the blunders of Jen Psaki, in principle, were admissible. Generally it's not her fault.
One may say: "How come?" I'll answer:
"For one simple reason. She is an official who reads out other people's thoughts."
Note that when a spokesman for the White House or [US] State Department goes to the rostrum, he[/she] carries a huge folder,
puts it [on the table], finds [bookmarks] in it, and reads [what is written there].
How can one blame Jen Psaki if she reads out from the papers prepared to her by a huge team and censored by superior officers?
What can she be accused of? She merely makes texts that a group of co-authors [handed to her] public.
As for Nikki Haley, the situation is completely different here. She is a professional diplomat.
She represents the United States in a quite special body – which is called the UNO.
And it's within her professional competencies to know how many countries [there are] in the world in general and how many of them are represented in the UN.
And if some Kosovo, or Northern Cyprus, or Taiwan is not represented [in the UN], then what reasons stand behind that, and what impact [it] has on their interests.
Therefore, she should have known by virtue of her professional position about Binomo [which] was mentioned [in the conversation].
This is her professional competence.
Here it is impossible to write [a mistake] off [on someone], as [it was in the case of] Jen Psaki: "What can you do, finally she delivers a collective output."
Here she must be knowledgeable and reactive.
And before speaking to some American lackey who calls and asks: "What are our national interests in the framework of this conflict?"
she had to say straightforwardly: "I'm sorry, but such country doesn't exist."
This is the field of her professional occupation!
I keep saying that
Trump is outplaying the [US] country "elite", i.e. the global "elite" are gaining the upper hand over the country elite.
I go back [to the question] why this call to Nikki Haley came about. Why the bell rang and why the fact was brought to public?
It's very simple.
Recent events in the United States show that the US country's "elite" bet not only on Vice President Pence as a replacement for Trump,
but they also bet on Haley as a replacement for Rex Tillerson as the head of the State Department.
The call of the prankers solved the problem of Haley.
Accordingly, weather one likes Tillerson or not, but in principle there is no one to replace him.
Just washed away as a charm.
This is the question of supranational management and [its] tools: how to solve the problems of global significance level through such pranks and pampering.
Some people think that the prankers have but trifle impact.
Well, just take a directory and [try to] find [the phone number]! And if you are on the phone call, then be sure that you will be double checked.
You will have to answer [and] prove your personality.
And what if they check through the apparatus of the same Prime Minister [of Poland]?
They will call directly to the person who is supposedly on a call [at the moment], to his personal telephone number and will say:
"A telephone call is being requested there.
Check it, please, through your own channels."
And he will have to confirm.
Is it easy to to be a pranker? Well, go ahead, [and try]!
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét