Thứ Tư, 31 tháng 10, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Oct 31 2018

 The president's comments to Axios on HBO come amid a renewed push for hard line immigration policies before the midterm elections

 RELATED: Trump celebrates 'fascist' win in Brazil RELATED: The map which fills Donald Trump with rage Mr Trump believes focusing on immigration will energise his supporters and help Republicans keep control of Congress

 Revoking birthright citizenship would spark a court fight over the president's unilateral ability to change an amendment to the Constitution

 The 14th Amendment guarantees that right for children born in the US. Asked about the legality of such an executive order, Mr Trump said "they're saying I can do it just with an executive order

" Mr Trump said White House lawyers are reviewing his proposal. It's unclear how quickly he'd act on an executive order

 BORDER CRACKDOWN The president's crackdown on birthright citizenship comes just after the Pentagon said it's sending 5200 troops to the Southwest border in an extraordinary military operation to try and stop Central American migrants moving north in slow-moving caravans that are still hundreds of miles from the US

Some of the troops will be armed. The number of troops being deployed is more than double the 2000 who are in Syria fighting the Islamic State group

 Mr Trump stepped up his dire warnings about the caravans in a scathing Twitter rant this week

 "This is an invasion of our Country and our Military is waiting for you!" But any migrants who complete the long trek to the southern US border already face major hurdles — both physical and bureaucratic — to being allowed into the United States

 In an interview on Monday, Mr Trump said the US would build "tent cities" for asylum seekers

 "We're going to put tents up all over the place," told Fox News Channel's Laura Ingraham

"They're going to be very nice and they're going to wait and if they don't get asylum, they get out

" Under current protocol, migrants who clear an initial screening are often released until their cases are decided in immigration court, which can take several years

 The Pentagon's "Operation Faithful Patriot" was described by the commander of US Northern Command as an effort to help Customs and Border Protection "harden the southern border" by stiffening defences at and near legal entry points

 Advanced helicopters will allow border protection agents to swoop down on migrants trying to cross illegally, said Air Force Gen

Terrence O'Shaughnessy. Troops planned to bring heavy concertina wiring to unspool across open spaces between ports

 "We will not allow a large group to enter the US in an unlawful and unsafe manner," Kevin McAleenan, commissioner of Customs and Border Protection said

 A KEY ELECTION ISSUE The escalating rhetoric over the migrants and expected deployments come as the president has been trying to turn immigration into a key election issue, just days before elections that will determine whether Republicans maintain control of Congress

 "This will be the election of the caravans, the Kavanaughs, law and order, tax cuts, and you know what else? It's going to be the election of common sense," Mr Trump said at a rally in Illinois on Saturday night

 On Monday, he tweeted without providing evidence, "Many Gang Members and some very bad people are mixed into the Caravan heading to our Southern Border

" It's possible there are criminals mixed in with immigration, but Mr Trump has not substantiated his claim that members of the MS-13 gang, in particular, are among them

 The troops are expected to perform a wide variety of functions such as transporting supplies for the Border Patrol, but not engage directly with migrants seeking to cross the border, officials said

 One US official said the troops will be sent initially to staging bases in California, Texas and Arizona while the CBP works out precisely where it wants the troops positioned

For more infomation >> Donald Trump wants to end birthright citizenship for some US-born babies - Duration: 6:22.

-------------------------------------------

What is the migrant caravan and why is it dominating the US midterm elections? - Duration: 5:19.

What is the migrant caravan and why is it dominating the US midterm elections?

For more infomation >> What is the migrant caravan and why is it dominating the US midterm elections? - Duration: 5:19.

-------------------------------------------

Illegal Invaders Just Got Massive Gift To Help Them Get To US – Who Paid For This?! - Duration: 2:39.

This is quite disturbing.

Thankfully we have a President who will protect the border.

Remember this when voting this election.

From The Gateway Pundit:

FOX News reporter Griff Jenkins is traveling with one of the illegal immigrant caravans

on its way to the US.

Caravan Organizers are seen loading illegal immigrants on buses to take them to their

next stop on their way to the United States.

There are currently FOUR DIFFERENT CARAVANS working their way to the southern US border

through Central America and Mexico.

Meanwhile, as we previously reported, these so-called "migrants" are not actually

"refugees" as the left likes to call them since they are refusing multiple residential

settlement options.

So what's their real motive here?

Denver 7 News is now reporting that members of the soon to be illegal alien caravan have

rejected an offer from Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto to settle in Mexico.

The thousands of illegal aliens within the group have instead decided to continue their

trip towards the United States which is very interesting since Peña Nieto's offer would

actually put the migrants into two Mexican states.

Where they would be offered temporary work permits, medical care, shelter, and even schooling.

But not welfare!

Here is more via The AP:

"Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto has announced what he called the "You are at

home" plan, offering shelter, medical attention, schooling and jobs to Central Americans in

Chiapas and Oaxaca states if migrants apply, calling it a first step toward permanent refugee

status.

Authorities said more than 1,700 had already applied for refugee status.

But a standoff unfolded as federal police officers blocked the highway, saying there

was an operation underway to stop the caravan.

Thousands of migrants waited to advance, vowing to continue their long trek toward the U.S.

border.

At a meeting brokered by Mexico's National Human Rights Commission, police said they

would reopen the highway and only wanted an opportunity for federal authorities to explain

the proposal to migrants who had rejected it the previous evening.

Migrants countered that the middle of a highway was no place to negotiate and said they wanted

to at least arrive safely to Mexico City to discuss the topic with authorities and Mexican

lawmakers

They agreed to relay information back to their respective sides and said they would reconvene.

For more infomation >> Illegal Invaders Just Got Massive Gift To Help Them Get To US – Who Paid For This?! - Duration: 2:39.

-------------------------------------------

Lawyer: States approval required for Constitutional change - Duration: 3:41.

For more infomation >> Lawyer: States approval required for Constitutional change - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

QAnon Reveals Vatican Rothschild Reptilian Connection Behind The Deep State - Duration: 9:22.

Reptilian extraterrestrials in a recent series of posts the anonymous

whistleblower group Q ANON made an important connection between the Vatican

Rothschild family and reptilian symbolism many followers of Q Anon to

fall into the camp of Christian Patriots perceive the connection as exposing

another world lay satanic influence over the Vatican their auth and other forces

making up the deep state closer analysis however suggests that what Q Anon is

really referring to by the symbolism is a very physical this worldly influence

over the deep state reptilian extraterrestrials to begin with I need

to point out what has become very clear to those closely following the Q Anon

posts which first appeared on October 28th 2017 Q Anon represents several

military intelligence officials who are leaking sensitive information and a

cryptic and coded Man or due to the pervasive influence of the deep state

over many institutions of political financial and cultural power Q Anon

close relationship with President Donald Trump has been demonstrated in various

public ways this has signaled he supports the Q Anon revelations and is

very familiar with who is really behind the deep state attempting to sabotage

his presidency in regard to deep state efforts to sabotage the Trump presidency

I highly recommend reading dr. Jerome courses book killing the deep state we

are now ready to take a closer look at what Q Anon is saying about the Vatican

Rothschilds and the reptilian connection on April 3rd Q Anon made the following

post where he attached an image posted by another anonymous source asking the

question if Satanists took over the Vatican would you notice so does the

symbolism and that Paul the sixth audience Hall really shown reptilian

control over the Vatican Canon helps answer such a question by his response

to the posted image symbolism will be their downfall money power influenced by

emphasizing symbolism Q Anon is saying that we need to closely

examine the reptilian imagery in the picture in order to really understand

who controls the Vatican Canadians - money power influence points to a nexus

of actors that underscore control of the Vatican this is where another canon post

becomes helpful in understanding this nexus of actors he pointed out that the

Vatican Bank Institute for the works of religion is at the fulcrum point of its

financial influence through its shady relationship with the CI a clown

connection indeed this close relationship between the

Vatican and the CIA gave rise to operation Gladio that was targeted

against left-wing organizations that threatened to tear Italy away from NATO

towards a closer relationship with the Soviet Union to understand the Vatican's

role in operation Gladio I highly recommend Paul Williams book Operation

Gladio the unholy alliance between the Vatican the c.i.a and the Mafia

however Koons most intriguing reference was to the 1832 Rothschild lone cannon

suggested here that the 1832 loan made the Vatican dependent on Rothschild

financing at the time and this dependence continues into the modern era

this is not surprising since at the time the Vatican was desperate to maintain

its diminishing temporal authority over the remaining territory of the papal

States seven five four one eight seven zero which was increasingly being

challenged by Italian secular nationalists it was this effort to

maintain political control over the papal States that made the Vatican

increasingly dependent on the Rothschilds who could move their agents

and to senior positions in the Catholic Church hierarchy this included the

Sovereign Military Order of the Knights of Malta which continues to be a

powerful force that linked Rothschild finances with elites drawn from around

the world kundan is telling us that the Rothschild family influence is very

important for understanding the financial power behind the deep state

and the Vatican is a key player in all of

this however there is more to the Rothschild family than simply possessing

financial influence over the Vatican this is where it becomes very helpful to

recount a story told by a former US Air Force doctor doe legal MD who described

in a Project Camelot interview a mysterious encounter he had with a

leading member of the Rothschild family Baron Guy de Rothschild in 1992 I woke

up in the middle of the night bolt upright and a sat up and I had all the

lights on because I'd have to periodically go to the restroom or

whatever I had all the lights on and this guy was standing in front of me

with what I call a $5,000 tuxedo not a grey hair in his head mid 50s slim and

trim I said how did you get in here and he says it's wonderful to see you my son

I said you are not my father and I looked at the sky and he looked like

French nobility right and I said who are you he says I am the Baron Guy de

Rothschild the Piner and I had this really kind of what I call a cheque or a

kind of a cringe in my spirit and I knew right away because I have this gift

right without getting into a big long discussion I knew right away I said I

know who you are you're the representative of the Lucifer power that

controls earth he says yes I am the CEO of Earth Incorporated and I am the man

that sits in the 13th chair of the druidic Council I want you to be my

understudy and when i transcend i want you to take over my job and I said no

I'm not going to he said we know your bloodlines we know your genetics we know

everything about you and you're a perfect replacement for me and I said no

what is interesting here is Rothschilds claim that he was the pine Durand was

the CEO of earthing incorporated this suggests that he is

merely running the earth on behalf of others but who for an answer we can look

to information about the Piner supplied by british researcher david grote about

the pine Durand the biggest secret after interviewing the former participant in

Satanic occult ceremonies Arizona Wilder throat Finder means penis of the Dragon

Arizona says that pine dur like all the reptilians when they shape-shift has

very powerful hypnotic eyes the evil eye of legend and at sacrifices the victims

faces turned to pine derp at the moment of death for him to steal the person's

soul or energy through this evil eye magnetic process pine durr attends the

major satanic ceremonies in europe and then flies to california for their

rituals their pages 302 to 3 the idea that a high-ranking member of the

Rothschild family Guy de Rothschild was a shape-shifting reptilian or a hybrid

of some kind will come as - a shock to many who disbelieve that

extraterrestrial life is a physical reality on earth this disbelief will be

markedly the case for those coming from a Christian background who ascribed the

Satanic Luciferian influence on earth to otherworldly demonic entities associated

with Hell as described in biblical passages however only last week Pope

Francis declared that there is no Hell in an interview he was quoted saying

they are not punished those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and enter

the rank of souls who contemplate him but those who do not repent and cannot

therefore be forgiven disappear there is no hell there is the disappearance of

sinful souls while the Vatican immediately tried to walk back the

Pope's comments his intent was very clear hell is no mere spiritual

dimension where Satan rules and acts as a distant but disruptive influence on

earth through his legion of demonic spirits the Pope has clarified that hell

is a very Zuka reality and corresponds to the

world created around us by sinful souls participating in satanic rituals

involving human sacrifice and pedophilia the implication here is that Satan is a

very physical being who is present on earth and has overlordship of the planet

through hybrid intermediaries such as the pine der which collectively make up

the deep state

For more infomation >> QAnon Reveals Vatican Rothschild Reptilian Connection Behind The Deep State - Duration: 9:22.

-------------------------------------------

QAnon Reveals Vatican Rothschild Reptilian Connection Behind The Deep State - Duration: 9:22.

Reptilian extraterrestrials in a recent series of posts the anonymous

whistleblower group cannon made an important connection between the Vatican

Rothschild family and reptilian symbolism many followers of cannon to

fall into the camp of Christian Patriots perceive the connection as exposing

another world lay satanic influence over the Vatican their auth and other forces

making up the deep state closer analysis however suggests that what Canon is

really referring to by the symbolism is a very physical this worldly influence

over the deep state reptilian extraterrestrials to begin with I need

to point out what has become very clear to those closely following the Canon

posts which first appeared on October 28th 2017 Canon represents several

military intelligence officials who are leaking sensitive information and a

cryptic and coded Man or due to the pervasive influence of the deep state

over many institutions of political financial and cultural power canons

close relationship with President Donald Trump has been demonstrated in various

public ways this has signaled he supports the Canon revelations and is

very familiar with who is really behind the deep state attempting to sabotage

his presidency in regard to deep state efforts to sabotage the Trump presidency

I highly recommend reading dr. Jerome courses book killing the deep state we

are now ready to take a closer look at what Canon is saying about the Vatican

Rothschilds and the reptilian connection on April 3rd canon made the following

post where he attached an image posted by another anonymous source asking the

question if Satanists took over the Vatican would you notice so does the

symbolism and that Paul the sixth audience Hall really shown reptilian

control over the Vatican Canon helps answer such a question by his response

to the posted image symbolism will be their downfall money power influenced by

emphasizing symbolism Kanon is saying that we need to closely

examine the reptilian imagery in the picture in order to really understand

who controls the Vatican Canadians - money power influence points to a nexus

of actors that underscore control of the Vatican this is where another canon post

becomes helpful in understanding this nexus of actors he pointed out that the

Vatican Bank Institute for the works of religion is at the fulcrum point of its

financial influence through its shady relationship with the CI a clown

connection indeed this close relationship between the

Vatican and the CIA gave rise to operation Gladio that was targeted

against left-wing organizations that threatened to tear Italy away from NATO

towards a closer relationship with the Soviet Union to understand the Vatican's

role in operation Gladio I highly recommend Paul Williams book Operation

Gladio the unholy alliance between the Vatican the c.i.a and the Mafia

however Koons most intriguing reference was to the 1832 Rothschild lone cannon

suggested here that the 1832 loan made the Vatican dependent on Rothschild

financing at the time and this dependence continues into the modern era

this is not surprising since at the time the Vatican was desperate to maintain

its diminishing temporal authority over the remaining territory of the papal

States seven five four one eight seven zero which was increasingly being

challenged by Italian secular nationalists it was this effort to

maintain political control over the papal States that made the Vatican

increasingly dependent on the Rothschilds who could move their agents

and to senior positions in the Catholic Church hierarchy this included the

Sovereign Military Order of the Knights of Malta which continues to be a

powerful force that linked Rothschild finances with elites drawn from around

the world kundan is telling us that the Rothschild family influence is very

important for understanding the financial power behind the deep state

and the Vatican is a key player in all of

this however there is more to the Rothschild family than simply possessing

financial influence over the Vatican this is where it becomes very helpful to

recount a story told by a former US Air Force doctor doe legal MD who described

in a Project Camelot interview a mysterious encounter he had with a

leading member of the Rothschild family Baron Guy de Rothschild in 1992 I woke

up in the middle of the night bolt upright and a sat up and I had all the

lights on because I'd have to periodically go to the restroom or

whatever I had all the lights on and this guy was standing in front of me

with what I call a $5,000 tuxedo not a grey hair in his head mid 50s slim and

trim I said how did you get in here and he says it's wonderful to see you my son

I said you are not my father and I looked at the sky and he looked like

French nobility right and I said who are you he says I am the Baron Guy de

Rothschild the Piner and I had this really kind of what I call a cheque or a

kind of a cringe in my spirit and I knew right away because I have this gift

right without getting into a big long discussion I knew right away I said I

know who you are you're the representative of the Lucifer power that

controls earth he says yes I am the CEO of Earth Incorporated and I am the man

that sits in the 13th chair of the druidic Council I want you to be my

understudy and when i transcend i want you to take over my job and I said no

I'm not going to he said we know your bloodlines we know your genetics we know

everything about you and you're a perfect replacement for me and I said no

what is interesting here is Rothschilds claim that he was the pine Durand was

the CEO of earthing incorporated this suggests that he is

merely running the earth on behalf of others but who for an answer we can look

to information about the Piner supplied by british researcher david grote about

the pine Durand the biggest secret after interviewing the former participant in

Satanic occult ceremonies Arizona Wilder throat Finder means penis of the Dragon

Arizona says that pine dur like all the reptilians when they shape-shift has

very powerful hypnotic eyes the evil eye of legend and at sacrifices the victims

faces turned to pine derp at the moment of death for him to steal the person's

soul or energy through this evil eye magnetic process pine durr attends the

major satanic ceremonies in europe and then flies to california for their

rituals their pages 302 to 3 the idea that a high-ranking member of the

Rothschild family Guy de Rothschild was a shape-shifting reptilian or a hybrid

of some kind will come as - a shock to many who disbelieve that

extraterrestrial life is a physical reality on earth this disbelief will be

markedly the case for those coming from a Christian background who ascribed the

Satanic Luciferian influence on earth to otherworldly demonic entities associated

with Hell as described in biblical passages however only last week Pope

Francis declared that there is no Hell in an interview he was quoted saying

they are not punished those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and enter

the rank of souls who contemplate him but those who do not repent and cannot

therefore be forgiven disappear there is no hell there is the disappearance of

sinful souls while the Vatican immediately tried to walk back the

Pope's comments his intent was very clear hell is no mere spiritual

dimension where Satan rules and acts as a distant but disruptive influence on

earth through his legion of demonic spirits the Pope has clarified that hell

is a very Zuka reality and corresponds to the

world created around us by sinful souls participating in satanic rituals

involving human sacrifice and pedophilia the implication here is that Satan is a

very physical being who is present on earth and has overlordship of the planet

through hybrid intermediaries such as the pine der which collectively make up

the deep state

For more infomation >> QAnon Reveals Vatican Rothschild Reptilian Connection Behind The Deep State - Duration: 9:22.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Commander Says 5,200 troops to the Southern Border "Just the Start" - Duration: 3:42.

The Trump administration is responding to the Central American caravan heading towards

the U.S. southern border by sending 5,200 military personnel to protect the United States.

Homeland Security and Pentagon officials said that the soldiers would focus on helping secure

key points of entry into the United States.

The deployment has been named 'Operation Faithful Patriot.'

According to a new report, a U.S. commander says the "5,200 troops" is just the beginning

of the operation and more troops will follow.

From Washington Examiner

SHOW OF FORCE: U.S. Northern Commander Air Force Gen. Terrence O'Shaughnessy is tackling

his mission to use the military to harden the southern border with gusto.

"We know border security is national security," he told reporters at a news conference yesterday,

in which he announced that 800 soldiers from Fort Campbell, Ky., are already en route to

Texas.

By week's end they will be joined by thousands more, not just in Texas, but also in Arizona

and California.

"By the end of this week, we will deploy over 5,200 soldiers to the southwest border.

That is just the start of this operation.

We'll continue to adjust the numbers and inform you of those," O'Shaughnessy said.

THE MISSION: The active-duty troops have two main objectives: Reinforce infrastructure,

such as security barriers at 26 designated ports of entry, and help seal gaps in the

border between the crossing points where immigrants may try to cross illegally.

But the responsibility for border security will remain with U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

"Our first level of effort with CBP will be to harden the points of entry and address

key gaps in areas around the points of entry," O'Shaughnessy said.

CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan disputed the idea that the deployment of thousands

of troops was a political ploy in advance of the midterms elections.

"No, this is a law enforcement operation from CBP's perspective and we partner with

DOD all the time to help secure our border," McAleenan said.

WHAT THE MILITARY BRINGS: Combat engineers to build things, such as barriers, walls,

fencing and tent cities.

"We have enough concertina wire to cover up to 22 miles, already deployed to the border.

We have additional concertina wire that we can string, with over 150 miles available,"

O'Shaughnessy said.

Helicopters to surveil the border, and quickly transport special operations Border Patrol

Tactical Units to austere locations where they can fast-rope down to the ground if needed.

And medical units to treat both border protection agents and immigrants.

WHAT'S THE THREAT?

The border patrol is concerned about being overwhelmed due to the sheer number of asylum

seekers, even if they try to enter through a designated border crossing.

"We've got to be prepared for the potential arrival of a very large group," McAleenan

said.

"What we saw when this group crossed the Honduras-Guatemala borders, they did it very

forcefully.

They pushed past the Guatemalan security forces.

Even more risky was on the Guatemala-Mexico border, where it was a combination, of you

know, near-rioting on the bridge and then crossing illegally."

The CBP says there are now two groups in Mexico each numbering more than 3,000.

For more infomation >> U.S. Commander Says 5,200 troops to the Southern Border "Just the Start" - Duration: 3:42.

-------------------------------------------

Illegal Invaders Just Got Massive Gift To Help Them Get To US – Who Paid For This?! - Duration: 2:50.

This is quite disturbing.

Thankfully we have a President who will protect the border.

Remember this when voting this election.

From The Gateway Pundit:

FOX News reporter Griff Jenkins is traveling with one of the illegal immigrant caravans

on its way to the US.

Caravan Organizers are seen loading illegal immigrants on buses to take them to their

next stop on their way to the United States.

There are currently FOUR DIFFERENT CARAVANS working their way to the southern US border

through Central America and Mexico.

Meanwhile, as we previously reported, these so-called "migrants" are not actually

"refugees" as the left likes to call them since they are refusing multiple residential

settlement options.

So what's their real motive here?

Denver 7 News is now reporting that members of the soon to be illegal alien caravan have

rejected an offer from Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto to settle in Mexico.

The thousands of illegal aliens within the group have instead decided to continue their

trip towards the United States which is very interesting since Peña Nieto's offer would

actually put the migrants into two Mexican states.

Where they would be offered temporary work permits, medical care, shelter, and even schooling.

But not welfare!

Here is more via The AP:

"Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto has announced what he called the "You are at

home" plan, offering shelter, medical attention, schooling and jobs to Central Americans in

Chiapas and Oaxaca states if migrants apply, calling it a first step toward permanent refugee

status.

Authorities said more than 1,700 had already applied for refugee status.

But a standoff unfolded as federal police officers blocked the highway, saying there

was an operation underway to stop the caravan.

Thousands of migrants waited to advance, vowing to continue their long trek toward the U.S.

border.

At a meeting brokered by Mexico's National Human Rights Commission, police said they

would reopen the highway and only wanted an opportunity for federal authorities to explain

the proposal to migrants who had rejected it the previous evening.

Migrants countered that the middle of a highway was no place to negotiate and said they wanted

to at least arrive safely to Mexico City to discuss the topic with authorities and Mexican

lawmakers

They agreed to relay information back to their respective sides and said they would reconvene.

For more infomation >> Illegal Invaders Just Got Massive Gift To Help Them Get To US – Who Paid For This?! - Duration: 2:50.

-------------------------------------------

Hispanic advocacy groups against effort to curb US birthright citizenship - Duration: 1:58.

For more infomation >> Hispanic advocacy groups against effort to curb US birthright citizenship - Duration: 1:58.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Diplomatic Couriers - Behind the Iron Curtain - Duration: 23:33.

NARRATOR: In 1918, the Diplomatic Courier Service

was established to support the work of American diplomats

by ensuring that classified messages and materials were

delivered safely and securely to U.S. embassies and consulates

around the world.

Over the 100 year history of the Courier Service,

this mission, critical to the national security of the United

States, has not changed.

In the 1950s, before the onset of the jet age,

this small group of couriers traveled tens of thousands

of miles per year, often spending months on the road.

Following World War II, as tensions between former allies

grew into the Cold War and the Soviets consolidated power

on their Western border, it became increasingly

difficult to reach our posts behind what became

known as the Iron Curtain.

Because of a continued mutual respect

for international conventions on diplomatic relations,

even during these complicated times,

diplomatic couriers were among the few still able

to travel across these borders.

Each week, they took the Orient Express from Vienna

to reach Budapest and Bucharest.

MR. JAMES VERREOS: Oh, the Orient Express.

That was, of course, a fabled train ride.

We never got to ride it all the way to Constantinople

or Istanbul, but we would pick it up in Vienna

and ride it in from Vienna to Budapest to Bucharest.

Then we would turn around and come back out.

Sometimes inside Europe, we'd take train travel

because it was more effective and quicker

than trying to take an airplane, especially when we

were providing service to the Iron Curtain countries, which

required two couriers to be on a trip for security reasons.

We were carrying classified material.

Top secret wasn't always something that was written.

In those days before the technology we have today,

we had to have code machines,

equipment that was highly classified.

Outside of the Iron Curtain you traveled solo.

For example, when delivering the pouches

to Southeast Asia or Africa or South America,

the courier went out on trips solo.

However, trips to the Iron Curtain,

we were always in pairs so that there was no possibility

that the couriers would be unable to have

control of their pouches.

MR. KENNETH COOPER: I think I've got the history right.

The reason we'd make paired trips behind the Curtain

goes back to immediate post-war.

An American courier fell off the train, and he was killed,

and his pouch disappeared for a while.

And there was, I think, a little suspicion

that this was not an accident.

Henceforth, the Americans decided

it would be a paired trip, and I think the British did the same.

MR. DONOVAN KLINE: You had to have somebody with the pouches

at all times.

We'd get out and walk up and down

the aisle in the Wagon-Lits, but that was as far as we ventured.

On the same sleeping cars, there were other couriers

from other nations -

Italian, French, Russians.

When they were outside of Russia,

they traveled paired, just like we did

behind the Iron Curtain.

That's one of the things about the Russians.

They wanted the same treatment in the West

that we were given behind the Iron Curtain, which

was decent for the most part.

MR. PHILIP OLIVARES: Well, your job

was to take care of those pouches.

I don't think we ever felt that somebody was threatening

us or trying to try to steal them,

but we always have to assume that.

In fact, I remember Jim Vandivier

and I got off the train with our pouches.

There was quite a load.

We pulled over one of these baggage cars

that was already half loaded, the porter said,

and there were Russian pouches on that.

There were two Russian couriers.

So here were the four of us.

He's got the pouches, watching our own bags.

There was only one baggage cart.

We tried to get a separate one, but they said no,

and that was it.

I thought how ironic -

the four of us in this situation.

We were stationed in Vienna.

There were two of us then.

Monday we would go into Budapest

and spend the night, and then the next day on to Bucharest.

MR. COOPER: Vienna itself was a lot of fun, and

so was Budapest. Except for the brief hiatus in Bucharest,

which was dull as dishwater,

the rest of it was fun.

MR. ERNEST HOHMAN: We used the Arlberg Orient

Express, which came out of Paris

but we picked it up in Vienna.

It's just a delightful city.

It showed the grandeur that it had

as part of the Austro-Hungarian empire,

even though it was somewhat damaged from

the rubble after the war.

[MUSIC - JOHANN STRAUSS - "THE BLUE DANUBE"]

The Austrians - one of the first things they thought

was important to rebuild was the Opera House.

And now to see the change, the transformation,

the rebuilding that was going on there.

Loved going to the opera.

Of course, the Danube is not blue.

It's only in the eyes of a poet and a composer.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

[VOCALIZING]

MR. KLINE: I attended my first and only opera, sung in German,

which I did not understand, and as a result never went

to another opera in my life.

[LAUGHS]

We did a lot of eating and a lot of sightseeing.

All of us did, because it was a fantastic city.

I repeated that Vienna detail several times

thereafter in later years.

It was always enjoyable for me because we got out

of the air for a while.

It was restful. On those trains

all we did was sleep, eat, and play

chess or pinochle or something like that.

MR. VINCENT CELLA: The courier would come down from Frankfurt

every week or twice a week to give us the stuff to take in.

Then we'd go shopping to get our food to take on the train,

made sure we had enough wine or scotch and reading material,

cards, et cetera.

And we'd leave at night from the West Bahnhof in Vienna

and made one stop,

I guess it's called the North Bahnhof.

And then into the border, which on the Austrian side

is Nickelsdorf.

And it would stay there for some long time.

So, even though Vienna is not that far from Budapest,

it was an overnight trip.

MR. VERREOS: The train, the Orient Express,

would set up a single sleeper car

for the diplomatic couriers.

That would be the British, the Queen's Messenger,

King's Messenger, the Italians, whoever -

any courier from any nation that was making a trip

would be on that train.

MR. HOHMAN: The other people in the sleeping compartments,

they were all diplomatic couriers

from various countries.

There were Italians and the British and the French,

also, because the air travel was not possible, particularly

during the winter months there.

We usually dressed rather casually at that point.

And the Italians would dress in their silk pajamas or a silk

robe and so on.

The English, which were the Queen's Messengers,

they were great storytellers,

raconteurs, and had fantastic tales to tell.

MR. COOPER: The Queen's Messenger was usually

a very senior officer,

an army officer or a military officer

or sometimes civil servant.

They traveled in pairs also, but their junior courier

was usually a retired policeman, so there

was a very distinct difference in rank.

So when the Queen's Messenger had his dinner,

the number two courier would lay out

a white tablecloth in his compartment

and proceed to serve him his meal.

We got a kick out of that.

MR. OLIVARES: The primary car for us was the old

Wagon-Lits Cook.

They handled all the sleeping cars.

The first class car was practically all couriers.

There was a dining car next to it, but the food was awful.

We had to cook our own food, so we all

carried a little alcohol stove we'd set up in the sleeping

compartment and we'd cook on that.

MR. VERREOS: The ride in would leave early in the evening,

and we would have dinner while we were on the train.

We had developed an international society of couriers,

and we'd set it up in advance so that the couriers

from this country would bring in an entree, the couriers

from the other country would bring in the salad, who

would bring in the dessert, who would bring in the wine,

and what have you.

And we would just merely leave notes

so that next week's couriers - we didn't know who they'd be,

but you'd get into Vienna and say, hey, it's this week,

I would say, well, if Ken and I were on a trip,

we got the note at the embassy

we were supposed to provide the wine.

We knew there'd be x number of couriers on board,

and we'd bring that much on.

Coming out was totally different.

The train left Bucharest near midnight,

so everybody was sacked in, and it was dawn

by the time you arrived in Vienna.

MR. CELLA: We slept in one compartment

on that portion of that trip.

Then it would cross into Hungary,

and that town was called Hegyeshalom.

After they stopped there for a long time,

we'd go into Budapest, and we'd arrive there in the morning.

MR. KLINE: We'd get off the train

and have a full 24 hour period in Budapest

where we could shop, look around.

And the parliament building there

was magnificent, especially from across the river where

you could see it so plainly.

MR. HOHMAN: It was an interesting city.

It was still showing war damage.

The bridge across the Danube River was destroyed.

It was laying there in the river itself.

But, you see, it had a glamor to it

yet, and it was trying to restore that.

And it was an exciting and interesting city

with a bit of the schmaltz that you had in Vienna,

Austria too, with evening dinners that were excellent

and violin music to go with it.

MR. COOPER: We'd have a layover sometimes, a day

or so in Budapest, which was fun.

It was still a lively city, and it was before the revolution.

MR. OLIVARES: Budapest itself -

I loved the city.

A lot of people consider it the Paris of Eastern Europe.

It still had some damage though, from World War II,

actually.

And then after the revolution, of course,

it really got torn apart.

In spite of communism and all the restrictions

they imposed on their society, they

were a really fun loving people.

I remember going to a nightclub and seeing the people dancing

and having a ball, and I thought, this can't be.

Everywhere else usually is so drab, like Moscow itself.

To see those people enjoying themselves and having fun,

they were a fun people.

MR. VERREOS: Hungary was the nicest place in the Iron

Curtain for couriers.

Even though you were always under surveillance

by the local KGB -

they were called AVOs in Hungary -

they were less intrusive than they were in Moscow.

MR. CELLA: We spent the whole day and the night

at the Hotel Duna, which was really a nice hotel

right on the Danube.

They had a nice restaurant, a little nice bar, and there

was a guy there that we used to refer to as AVO Joe,

and he would always befriend the couriers.

And we were sure that he were being paid by the AVO

just to keep an eye on the couriers,

but we all sort of liked the guy.

He was helpful, a funny old guy.

And you enjoyed walking around Budapest,

even though it was still pretty well shot

because of the revolution.

In fact, they did more damage, I think, during that time

than they did during the war.

What I always understood was that the Russian troops didn't want

to fight against the Hungarians, and the AVO

were tougher on the Hungarian citizens

than the Russian soldiers.

The revolution started right in front of the Hotel Duna,

and the two couriers were stuck in there for about a week.

They were Woody Vest and Phil Olivares.

MR. OLIVARES: We got off at the station.

We went to the Duna Hotel.

The Duna is the word for the Danube, of course.

It was right on the river.

It was quite a hotel.

It's an old fashioned hotel with the high ceilings and all that.

We liked the place.

And I remember Woody Vest and I, we went to see the opera.

They were doing "Eugene Onegin."

We came back from the theater, and then

we got into the elevator, and we heard

some noise and such about.

We thought something's going on around town.

I think we heard a shot or two, if I'm not mistaken.

But I remember -

and in the elevator was the New York Times correspondent

and his wife.

And we said, well,

we asked him,

I said, "You know, what's going on?"

He said, "Oh, it seems to be a minor thing" and all that.

Well, [CHUCKLES] we went up to our rooms.

The next morning, we got a call from the Legation

saying, "Stay put.

You're not going anyplace.

Everything is closing down.

We're in the beginning of an insurrection."

And that's when it started.

And the shooting starts.

And we just stayed put a couple of days.

There was British couriers in there as well.

There was some shooting.

I think I walked out to see what was going on at one point.

I walked a few feet, and I heard bullets whizzing by my ear,

and I said, I better get back into the hotel.

And then I realized it was really bad.

And they even brought in a Russian soldier

who had been hit by a sniper. One of the Hungarian insurgents

was up on the roof.

[GUNFIRE]

The Legation wanted to evacuate most of the personnel.

In fact, most of legations - the British as well.

They put us in Embassy cars with dependents,

and we drove out of Budapest with the flag

flying on the fenders like Ambassadors' cars.

But I remember the people applauding and clapping

when they saw Americans and British flags.

All around them were Russians.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

I remember, even in the hotel, the men behind the desk,

the reception desk, kept saying,

"Where are you Americans?

Why don't you help us?"

They said, "Your Voice of America tells

us to rise up, do something about it,

and now we need your help."

RADIO COMMENTATOR: [SPEAKING HUNGARIAN]

RADIO COMMENTATOR: [SPEAKING HUNGARIAN]

MR. OLIVARES: I felt so embarrassed by all of this,

in a sense.

Why aren't we helping these people?

And I felt a little guilty that we were

like rats leaving this ship.

They were applauding but we're not really

doing anything for them.

We should be doing something for them,

and we should have our tanks in here.

But I know that's not something for me to decide on.

And I always felt a little guilty about that going out.

We're going out to safety, and these people

got to be here and live with the Russians on top of them.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

MR. CELLA: The longest part was when you got on the train

the next morning to Bucharest because that was overnight

from the morning to the next morning.

After going all through the Ploiesti oil fields.

Oh, you see them burning the gas off the top.

It was really something.

Yeah, that was pretty close to the end of the trip because

they were up still in the mountains.

Not long after that, you came down into Bucharest.

You'd get in in the morning, and leave late at night.

So you'd spend the whole day in Bucharest.

For most of the time I was there,

we stayed with the Military Attache, no matter who he was.

MR. KLINE: We would arrive in Bucharest

early in the morning, six o'clock or so,

something like that, and we would

go to the Military Attache's residence.

He provided us with breakfast.

They couldn't get fruits and vegetables and stuff like that.

We would carry oranges into them and give them

oranges or bananas.

The diplomatic colony there,

the Western diplomatic colony,

had a six hole golf course at a club that they had

where they had a bar.

And you could play six holes.

And I did.

I played six holes of golf there more than once.

A place for the Western community

to relax without anybody around spying on them -

and I'm sure there was plenty of that behind the Iron Curtain

at all times.

I don't know whether I was followed.

I wasn't looking for it.

But we were briefed beforehand:

"Don't fraternize.

Don't get caught with any women behind the Iron

Curtain, period."

MR. CELLA: Well, we went out a lot of times

to that diplomatic golf course, especially in the good weather.

We would bring cigarettes and razorblades and instant coffee

to pay for our golf lessons.

And there was a little lake there

where you could go out in a little boat

to help spend the day because it wasn't that long

and we left again that night.

We had to check in and get the pouches

and leave to go back.

MR. COOPER: I found Bucharest a very uninteresting city.

Now they were really behind the Curtain there.

I can't recall having any interaction at all.

For their sake and our sake, it was better not to.

That was my impression.

Perhaps if I were to go back today, I'd be dead wrong.

MR. HOHMAN: Bucharest - yeah.

We had time there too, and it's a poorer country.

It was a dictatorship for quite a while under Ceausescu.

As we well know, the people were really dominated

with the secret police, although the communist elite

led a very gracious and a very luxurious lifestyle.

I found it rather a poor city, by contrast even

with Budapest which still had a glory aspect to it.

MR. CELLA: Going back it was a little different.

We would get some food in Bucharest,

buy bread and buy this and buy that

at these little outlet stores.

You know, you had to stand in line to buy some stuff.

It was depressing, in a way -

for the people, I mean.

As we came back on that trip, we would

leave in the night from Bucharest,

get in the next night into Budapest.

The train would stop in Budapest for quite a long time.

You could see that red star in the foggy night mist.

Not until the next morning we'd end up back in Vienna.

MR. OLIVARES: We'd enjoy those trips.

I think we all did.

I still think it's a more civilized way to travel,

by train.

Train stations were fascinating in those days.

They had all the excitement that airports took on.

I remember in Europe, the railroad stations themselves -

they were big, cavernous affairs, mostly wrought iron

and such.

There was an aura about them all that fascinated me.

I felt so proud to be part of all of that.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

For more infomation >> U.S. Diplomatic Couriers - Behind the Iron Curtain - Duration: 23:33.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Senate Debate: Should the U.S. block the Raytheon arms deal with Saudi Arabia? - Duration: 3:45.

For more infomation >> U.S. Senate Debate: Should the U.S. block the Raytheon arms deal with Saudi Arabia? - Duration: 3:45.

-------------------------------------------

Analysis | What 500 elections in 28 European countries can tell us about the effects of anti-immigra - Duration: 8:23.

U.S. riot police officers take part in a border security drill at the U.S.-Mexico international bridge, as seen from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on Monday

(AFP/Getty Images) By Elizabeth Dekeyser and Michael Freedman October 30 at 7:45 AM As the midterms loom, President Trump and the Republican Party have ratcheted up their rhetoric on immigration

Monday, the Trump administration announced it would be sending 5,200 additional troops to the U

S.-Mexico border to prevent the Central American migrant caravan from crossing into the United States

 Last week, the president claimed without evidence that "unknown Middle Easterners" were part of the caravan

Republican candidates throughout the United States are echoing this tone, firing up their base with renewed calls for border walls, deportations and even an end to birthright citizenship

This talk appears to be what many voters want to hear. Using fear-mongering and anti-immigrant rhetoric to mobilize support is nothing new

Yet how does this rhetoric influence individual attitudes? Our large-scale analysis of how European elections affect attitudes toward immigration offers some clues

Scholars have long touted the benefits of elections, such as civic engagement, for established democracies

Usually, scholars examine elections' possible negative effects, like social polarization or conflict only in new democracies

But the imminent midterms, and lingering effects of U.S. and European recent elections, remind us that elections can have negative social effects even in established democracies

Here's how we did our research To examine how elections affect attitudes toward immigration, we examined variation in interview dates in the European Social Survey

Due to the way the survey is conducted, the date that an individual is surveyed is random, with some people being questioned closer to elections and others further from elections

While individual responses vary, if there are large, statistically significant average differences between responses at different distances from elections, this indicates that the elections are causing, not just correlated with, these attitudinal changes

Integrating information from over 500 elections between 2002 and 2015 across 28 European countries and nearly 300,000 respondents, we find that as elections approach, Europeans hold more negative attitudes toward immigration

When we delve into this a bit further, we find that while the overall effect is negative, individual attitudes are actually becoming more polarized, with more people viewing immigration either very positively or very negatively

These negative effects linger even after the elections. We see a roughly symmetrical effect on attitudes pre- and post-election

But these effects are not permanent. As elections recede, individual attitudes become less negative and polarized, returning to a more moderate average in the period before a new election approaches

[Here's what social science tells us about that migrant 'caravan' — and the Trump administration's response] When party rhetoric against immigrants gets heated, public attitudes polarize When we examine why elections have these effects, we find that party rhetoric seems to matter a great deal

Integrating data from the Manifesto project, which measures the percent of party platforms dedicated to different topics in each country, we find that elections with high levels of nationalist and anti-immigrant rhetoric affect individual attitudes much more strongly than those with low levels of such rhetoric

This effect is separate from overall issue salience. We measure salience using data from Google Trends on the number of Google searches of the term "immigration," in the native language of each country, during election periods versus non-election periods

While immigration becomes more salient during election periods, even when we control for this salience in our analysis, party manifestos continue to have an outsize effect

In other words, whether individuals hear more about immigration more generally doesn't have much effect; rather, their more extreme attitudes correlate with parties' rhetoric specifically

We also find that this does not appear to solely about race; respondents feel equally negatively toward immigrants who share their race or ethnicity

[Why are so many children coming to the U.S. from Central America in the first place?] Interestingly, elections that include the highest levels of anti-immigrant and nationalistic rhetoric result in high levels of polarization but not the most negative overall attitudes

 Elections with the highest level of anti-immigrant rhetoric appear to bring a backlash, presumably because extreme rhetoric alienates more moderate individuals

Elections with above-average anti-immigrant rhetoric are the ones associated with the highest levels of anti-immigrant sentiment overall

Anti-immigrant election rhetoric affects attitudes toward other marginalized groups as well Elections shot through with anti-immigrant rhetoric appears to polarize attitudes toward marginalized groups more broadly, increasing highly negative and highly positive attitudes toward welfare systems and LGBT rights

We expect we would find similar results if we were to examine attitudes to other hot-button social issues, such as reproductive rights or responses to sexual assault and the #MeToo movement

[How deporting immigrants from the U.S. increases immigration to the U.S.] So what does this mean for the U

S.'s current political moment? First, given the strong anti-immigrant rhetoric coming from the Republican Party, we expect that many Americans' attitudes will become increasingly anti-immigrant as well

Second, we would not expect this to dissipate immediately after the election — although as time goes by, individual attitudes should soften and return to a less negative average

Third, Trump's and other Republicans' anti-immigrant rhetoric, while effective in energizing their base, may turn off some more moderate voters

Finally, when parties choose to reject such rhetoric, elections need not have such polarizing effects

Elizabeth Dekeyser and Michael Freedman are PhD candidates in political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

For more infomation >> Analysis | What 500 elections in 28 European countries can tell us about the effects of anti-immigra - Duration: 8:23.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Air Force Air Mobility Command: Always Ready. Always There. - Duration: 3:10.

In the Air Force, if it leaves the ground, we fly it.

From satellites to fighter jets.

But some of us fly the heavies,

airplanes so big you can fit other aircraft inside them.

If something needs to get there fast, we're the ones they call.

No matter where there is.

All we need is a flat stretch of dirt or sheet of ice to get in and get out.

You see, Mobility's roots run deep and when you've been doing something for as long as we have, you get pretty good at it.

It was September 7, 1918 when we first transported a group of soldiers from Chanute Airfield to Champaign, Illinois

and we haven't stopped since.

We paid the ultimate sacrifice

to save a battalion of soldiers lost behind enemy lines during World War I.

We flew over The Hump more times than we can count and over the beaches of Normandy as many times as it took.

When the Russians tried to wall off Berlin from the rest of the world,

we air dropped hope in the form of food and medical supplies for more than a year.

That's why we do this job.

Give us an impossible mission, and we'll find a way to get it done.

When our fighters need to travel halfway around the world, our tankers serve as gas stations in the sky.

We can turn a C-17 into a mobile hospital at a moment's notice when a life depends on it, and it always does.

Sure the hours are long, and we're away from our families more than we'd like, but

if that's what it takes to get another service member home to their family, then sign us up.

There's not a corner of this globe that is out of our reach,

or any passenger we're not prepared to carry there.

We show up to work every day

ready to move the right stuff to the right place at the right time.

Some days that means delivering food and other life-saving supplies to hurricane victims.

Other days it means bringing home our nation's most treasured cargo, which we do with honor and dignity.

When our tails land in a different country that has experienced tragedy, they know help has arrived.

We will transport the most powerful weapons known to man and take the fight to the enemy when we need to.

We serve our brothers and sisters in arms and know they've come to rely on us.

We take pride in that.

We're Air Mobility Command.

All we need is a plane and we'll move anything you've got anywhere you need it.

Aim high, Airman

For more infomation >> U.S. Air Force Air Mobility Command: Always Ready. Always There. - Duration: 3:10.

-------------------------------------------

Sing the States | 50 States Song | Jack Hartmann - Duration: 2:31.

I'm proud to work and play In the USA

I'm proud to live everyday

In the land of the free

There are 50, 50

United States in this country

50, 50 Home of the proud and the free

Sing the states with me

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii Hawai'i

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

I'm proud to work and play In the USA

I'm proud to live everyday

In the land of the free

There are 50, 50 United States in this country

50, 50 Home of the proud and the free

Home of the proud and the free

Sing the states with me

For more infomation >> Sing the States | 50 States Song | Jack Hartmann - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

You probably don't know this about U.S. elections | HKS Professor Alex Keyssar - Duration: 4:12.

[Announcer] Harvard Kennedy School presents

three things you didn't know about U.S. elections.

Number one.

There is no right to vote in the U.S. Constitution.

[Keyssar] It was not in the original Constitution.

It was not in the Bill of Rights.

This surprises most people.

The states had already developed franchise requirements

of their own and thinking in Philadelphia

was that if they chose any particular standard

it might well antagonize people from some states.

So, in effect they punted, didn't say anything

and left it to the states.

There have been attempts to add a right to vote

to the constitution and they have all failed

and never come close.

[Announcer] Number two.

Historically, voter suppression was not just a southern

problem.

[Keyssar] Most of us are quite aware that in the late 19th and

early 20th century, there were massive voter suppression

and disenfranchisement efforts in the south

that were aimed at African Americans.

What is less well known, is that there was an analogous

movement, less severe, but none the less important,

in the northern states to keep immigrant workers

from voting.

There were literacy requirements to vote

in many northern states, including Massachusetts.

There was an English language literacy requirement

that was passed in New York in 1921

and it remained on the books until the late 1960s.

In Minnesota there were laws that were passed

that prevented people who work in the timber industry,

these people were seen as itinerant,

and they were not allowed to vote.

Or one of my favorite examples,

was the suppression of Jewish voters in New York City

early in the 20th century for several years.

When New York had an annual registration requirement,

you had to register every year in order to vote.

And in one year to limit the voting strength

of New York's Jews and particularly New York's Jewish

socialists, the only registration days

were on the Jewish high holidays of Yom Kippur

and Rosh Hashanah.

[Announcer] Number three.

In the late 1960s, the U.S. almost abandoned

the Electoral College, but then it didn't.

[Keyssar] It has in recent years been a great deal of attention

focused on the Electoral College

and with good reason.

Because we have had two presidents within the last 20 years

have been elected, who did not win the popular vote.

What people don't know is that we got very close

to eliminating the Electoral College

and replacing it with a National popular vote

in 1969 and 70.

The impetus for it was coming

from several different directions.

The first was that from the late 1940s

through out the 50s, there were movements

to reform and nobody really thought

that it was a very good institution or a very wise one.

A second, was the Supreme Court decisions on districting

issues in the early 1960s would proclaim loudly

and clearly and unmistakably that the fundamental

democratic principle was one person one vote.

And it was very hard to embrace that principle

without thinking that perhaps it should apply

to presidential elections as well.

In September of 1969, the House of Representatives

voted by, I think it was, 82 percent

to amend the constitution

to get rid of the Electoral College

and have a National popular vote.

It was killed by a filibuster, led by souther senators.

But there was a real democratic surge.

A surge of a democratic ethos in the United States

in the 1960s and it almost carried are way forward

into getting rid of the Electoral College.

[Announcer] Thank you, Professor Keyssar.

If you liked this video, hit the like button.

And if you'd like to see more, subscribe.

For more infomation >> You probably don't know this about U.S. elections | HKS Professor Alex Keyssar - Duration: 4:12.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Diplomatic Couriers - Into Moscow - Duration: 26:12.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

NARRATOR: In 1918, the Diplomatic Courier Service

was established to support the work of American diplomats

by ensuring that classified messages and materials were

delivered safely and securely to U.S. embassies and consulates

around the world.

Over the hundred year history of the courier service

this core mission has not changed,

and remains critical to the national security

of the United States.

Before the onset of the jet age, this small group of couriers

traveled tens of thousands of miles per year,

often spending months on the road.

Following World War II, relations between the United

States and the Soviet Union -

once allies - were increasingly strained

and grew into what became known as the Cold War.

Even during these complicated times,

a mutual respect for international conventions

on diplomatic relations meant that the couriers

were among the few still able to travel into the Soviet Union.

Making the trip from Helsinki into Moscow several times

a week, they brought the diplomatic pouch

with classified correspondence from Washington,

news from the West, and even personal mail.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

MR. JAMES VERREOS: Some of the more interesting and funny things

occurred, of course, especially on trips to Moscow.

The Soviets were right on your back.

You were almost never six feet away from somebody who

was looking over your shoulder.

We served the Soviet Union by what we called a satellite

office in Helsinki.

MR. ERNEST HOHMAN: But Helsinki is very unique,

there's no question about it.

You go there in the winter months

and they have a sign that says, welcome to Santa Claus land.

And that's where, in a sense, you

feel - a lot of ice and snow.

But it's a beautiful country.

MR. KENNETH COOPER: Every time I had the Helsinki

detail it was always in December, January, or February.

So I have probably a different perspective

on this than the guys who did it in June, July, and August.

But we had a lot of fun there in the meantime.

MR. PHILIP OLIVARES: Well, that detail was about a month.

But we rotated on it, because I think

there were about four or five of us in the mill on that.

One man was traveling from Frankfurt by train

up to Hamburg.

From Hamburg they flew to Copenhagen,

and then continued on to Stockholm, and then

into Helsinki.

And two guys would take it from Helsinki

into Leningrad and into Moscow.

MR. VERREOS: We would station couriers

in Helsinki for usually a two month period.

And during those two months, all they would do

would make the twice weekly trips into the Soviet Union

with flights from Helsinki to Leningrad to Moscow

and back and out.

And then once a month, there was a train trip from Helsinki

to Moscow delivering the non-classified pouches.

By treaty,

nothing could come in as just plain freight material, as you

would say, commercial material.

Anything that went in for the embassy had to be in a pouch.

So when we're moving furniture, for example,

the non-classified pouch usually was one or two freight cars.

The material would be stuck into the freight car,

and the freight car would be closed,

and a wire and lead seal and a tag

would be placed on that freight car as if it were a bag.

MR. DONOVAN KLINE: On Helsinki detail,

there were four couriers at a time, up there rotating.

Once a month, we went to Moscow on a Russian

a sleeper train out of Helsinki Station.

We went to Viborg, and we passed through there

with little or no problems at all.

It was nighttime when we left -

of course, saw nothing.

It was pitch black.

We would take in surface pouches

with copies of Newsweek and Time.

MR. VERREOS: We were traveling soft class,

because the class conscious Soviets didn't

have anything like first class and second class.

They had soft class and hard class.

Well, we were traveling soft class,

so we would have a cabin.

All we did was play cards and enjoy whatever food

they had on the train.

It wasn't particularly what you'd call first class,

but it was better than hard class, believe me.

MR. COOPER: I think we had one train trip a month.

We flew in and out most of the time,

on a Russian Ilyushin 12 and then later an Ilyushin 14

airplane.

That was always kind of exciting.

I remember one instance where I had

something like 12 large bags, all under diplomatic seal.

And we took up the whole center of the airplane.

And I thought, surely Russian customs

are going to dig in their heels on this.

But they didn't bat an eye.

MR. KLINE: The other trips were always flying in.

And we flew in mostly on Aeroflot and FinnAir,

depending on the day of the week, I think.

MR. OLIVARES: First time I flew a Saab,

that was a funny experience.

Looked like a DC-3 with a nose wheel.

The stewardess would come and ask you,

"Have you ever been on the Saab before?"

And if you hadn't, they'd give you a little booklet.

They said, "Please do not be alarmed.

When we land the pilot will feather

the props to reverse the engines to slow down

to assist on the braking."

But on doing so, a whole sheet of flame

would come out of the exhaust things.

Blue flame would go past, I mean you could see this.

People, I remember seeing -

I was pre-warned by the little booklet -

but there was some guy who didn't read English

and didn't know this,

and he jumped out of his seat.

They were funny, those flights.

I remember on one of the Aeroflots, looking for my seatbelt.

And the pilot happened to be coming on board.

He was going down the aisle.

He said, "No, don't worry about that.

You don't need those."

We used to get these caviar sandwiches for breakfast.

It was a soft roll with fresh caviar, not the tinned stuff.

They took it for granted.

MR. VERREOS: Going to Moscow in those days -

to get off the train and walk around the city

was just depressive.

The Russians were, the people were hungry to hear about America.

A few of them would speak some English.

A few of them spoke some German.

Unfortunately, none of our couriers that I knew of

spoke Russki-

[SPEAKING RUSSIAN]

But whenever we were able to communicate,

they were very, very friendly, the Russian people.

Some KGB person was watching us.

They knew that.

And on a couple occasions, people at a party

that had one or two vodkas too many

would just flip the finger, knowing

that the KGB would get it.

Some were defiant, but there were very few.

MR. OLIVARES: Going into Moscow,

it was a little difficult. Everything was black, brown.

Nobody had any color on them at all.

The city was so drab.

It seems to me, most of my time in Moscow

had to be in the wintertime.

There was always snow on the streets,

people shoveling it away, and everybody doing their duty.

They just went about their life like a drudgery.

There was no happiness or pleasure in their faces.

Particularly when you got on the metro, which

was very elaborate.

The government decided this is going to be our showpiece,

and it was.

It was such a contrast with the people sitting in the metro.

MR. KLINE: First trip there, I was

surprised by how wide the streets were there.

They were really wide.

There was more traffic there than I expected to see.

A good bit of it was Russian trucks,

but there were more cars than I ever expected to see.

And we can go anywhere we wanted around town.

I walked a long ways there, up to Red Square one day.

Saw the mausoleum where the two stiffs were,

Lenin and Stalin.

It was interesting.

People were lined up eight abreast outside to get in.

When we got in, it was below ground.

They had selective lighting with these mummies were.

They looked very lifelike, both of them.

Stalin was somewhat shorter than I expected.

He was only about 5'3" or 4".

Lenin looked exactly like all the pictures

I'd ever seen of him -

goatee, the whole thing.

And he looked very natural.

We were respectful.

I wasn't sad at all.

The others were, because that's why they were there.

This was all they knew.

This was their life since 1917, and this was 1957 -

40 year anniversary that year.

It was interesting, to say the least.

MR. HOHMAN: We had this "propisk"

which allowed us to jump the line and get into the mausoleum

to see Lenin and Stalin.

Russians from outside of Moscow were

allowed at least once a year to come to Moscow

on their internal passport.

And there were huge lines in all kinds of weather.

One of the hotels that we had was near Red Square.

And after dinner I walked over to where the mausoleum is

for Lenin and Stalin, and watched

the changing of the guard.

And as I was watching, a man nudged up to me and said,

"You American?"

Yeah.

He said, "That's a nice coat you're wearing.

He said, "You want to sell it to me?"

I said, "No, it's the only coat I've got."

He said, "Do you have any jeans?"

I said, "Look, this is a sacred place.

We're right here for the changing of the guard.

We're in front of the mausoleum for Lenin and Stalin,

and you want to do this?"

He says, "Why not?

What better place?"

No, I didn't sell them anything or give him anything.

But I was really shocked about that situation, really.

Yeah.

I said, well, free enterprise.

We've got it right here.

But the whole Kremlin, we were allowed

to see the museum and so on.

And then across the way they had the GUM department store.

MR. COOPER: We got to go into the Kremlin

at one time on some kind of an embassy tour.

It was an unusual happening.

We were shown a typical dining room in the Tsar's palace.

I think they wanted to impress us on how high on the hog

the nobility lived as opposed to the peasants.

MR. KLINE: There weren't that many tourists in Moscow

in those days, outsiders.

I went through St. Basil's Cathedral

on Red Square, which I found fascinating for several things.

There were no church services being held in there,

but it was quite pretty inside besides being

beautiful outside.

There was a store there called GUM, G-U-M. I don't know

what it stood for in Russian.

I bought caviar there and hauled the caviar out to Helsinki

where we had parties with it.

And it was delicious beluga caviar, really delightful.

MR. COOPER: I did get to go to GUM, the big department store,

one time.

Sort of an exercise in futility.

Huge lines at every counter. There was

a shortage of everything.

MR. HOHMAN: The huge department store

was a depressing sort of place.

There were only limited things

that we could really find of interest, even though we

had a good exchange rate.

Musical instruments were rather cheap, or some books -

English books, because they didn't

recognize the copyrights.

One of the interesting things was

Russian caviar. The caviar was from virgin sturgeon,

they said.

That was the best tasting.

There really wasn't a heck of a lot to buy.

MR. VERREOS: In the men's shoe department

they had four sizes of shoes, and two colors -

black and brown.

Apparently they bought the size a little bigger so they could

stuff paper or whatever in so that the shoe would fit.

In 90% of the different stands, say in the women's department

for dresses or stockings and stuff like that,

they would have on display.

But they would have no product available to sell.

You'd go down the big street on which the embassy was,

to the various shops.

You'd go to the shop that sold bread.

And you look in there, and there is no bread.

But there'd be a line of people going around the block.

It was very depressing to see people there.

The pricing situation was ridiculous.

We could get seats to the Bolshoi in the first eight rows

for what it cost you to buy an egg if there was

one available in the market.

I remember, it was 32 rubles for the seats at the Bolshoi,

and it's 32 or 34 rubles to buy an egg.

MR. CELLA: We spent the afternoon

walking around Red Square.

We'd always get tickets to go to the Bolshoi

and Stanislavsky.

I remember coming out of an intermission at the Bolshoi.

I guess we were watching some big ballet.

The best seats are the first row of that center balcony.

And right in the first row of that sitting up above us

was Khrushchev and Bulganin.

Bulganin was the official head, and Khrushchev was the chairman.

We were that close to them.

The balcony is only like, that high

from the ceiling of this room.

MR. HOHMAN: There is a great amusement area,

Gorky Park.

Very nice, with the Ferris wheel that they had there.

It was a fun place. A lot of people with their children

there, also.

They had games, swings and so on, for them.

Chess was a big game. Of course there were

very skilled individuals using

all these well-known moves, and then

people surrounding these chess players, watching them.

And they're going, "Ooh, aah."

It was light and fun.

Moscow generally, because of the lighting

and because of the atmospheric conditions, the way

the buildings weren't properly maintained,

had a drab atmosphere to it.

This was a ray of sunshine, particularly during the spring

and summer months.

And a favorite among them was eating ice cream.

Because I understand Micoyan, one of the Russian premiers,

visited the United States and he liked ice cream.

He brought ice cream machines back to Russia.

And Russians, even you got four or five feet of snow

out there, eating a cone of ice cream.

MR. CELLA: We used to stay in that place called

the Amerikanski Dom,

the America House,

a good distance walk from the embassy.

MR. OLIVARES: That was a way from the embassy itself.

It was about a mile down the road.

There was a building with mostly the military air attache

people, the staff

and the sergeants and all that.

But that was a big center of life for the Americans.

That was - everybody, even the staff from the embassy

went down there.

And there was mostly bachelors in there.

MR. VERREOS: Over at Amerikanski Dom,

the America House, which was about two,

three miles away from the embassy,

and it was on the Moscow River pretty much opposite the entry

to Gorky Park.

And Amerikanski Dom is where the single personnel lived.

The girls that were so-called maids

to do the cleaning service and

the maids in the cafeteria in Amerikanski Dom

were all striking beauties, believe me.

MR. KLINE: In the America House, Amerikanski Dome,

we had two or three Russian women

who served our meals at the restaurant there.

One was called Tanya.

And she spoke very good English.

And her ears were wide open at all times,

listening to the conversations around those tables.

And we'd walk in and we'd say, "Do svidaniya, Tanya."

(LAUGHS)

MR. CELLA: In the Amerikanski Dom

was a nice looking woman who worked there

as a waitress and everything.

Tanya, her name was.

So I made a big spiel to her.

And all she said was, her response was, "You want soup?"

That's all I heard after that.

"Vince, do you want soup?"

MR. HOHMAN: We stayed initially at that time

at the so-called Amerikanski Dom, which was a housing area

separate from the embassy, but it was an embassy place.

We had food there that was served by a Russian,

a very, very interesting woman.

And some of the fellas tried to date her and so on,

and she would never budge and say, "Soup?

Vince, soup?

More soup for you?"

MR. VERREOS: The Amerikanski Dom, by the way,

was the social center for all of the diplomatic personnel

in Moscow.

Every night at Amerikanski Dom we

were showing some American movie.

So we always had a lot of the diplomatic corps would

be coming in to see the movie.

MR. KLINE: Once a week they held open house there

for the Western foreign embassies -

Brits, the Swedes, the Finns, whoever, Germans, for bingo.

One night there was a terrible noise out

on the side of this building toward the Moscow River.

And we all looked out and here it was,

the Russians practicing for their Independence Day

celebration - so-called Independence Day

celebration - in November, on the anniversary

of the Russian Revolution.

They rolled tanks by us.

They rolled armored cars by us.

They rolled great big huge guns on flatbed trucks,

and all kinds of stuff, making this clamorous

noise for a couple of hours,

practicing for the spontaneous demonstration

that was going to be two weeks later in Red Square.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

Later on when we lost our space in Amerikanski Dom,

we stayed in Russian hotels.

And there were women overseers on each of the floors.

I'm sure they kept sure that we didn't go anyplace.

Or if they did, they called somebody.

I'm sure of that.

I don't think - well, I don't know,

but I don't think I was followed up there.

I may have been, who knows?

I didn't worry about it.

They didn't want an incident and we didn't want one.

They wanted their couriers outside treated well,

and so they treated us.

Now, I don't know whether they followed us or not.

They probably did, but I wasn't looking for it

and I wasn't worried about it 'cause

I wasn't doing anything wrong.

MR. OLIVARES: Well, we knew in Moscow, definitely.

I don't know about the other countries behind the Curtain,

but definitely in Russia you knew

somebody was following you.

Yeah.

Wherever you went, somebody kept an eye on you.

Because you stood out too, in those days.

Your dress, for one thing.

Nobody bothered you, of course.

Most of them were rather surprised to meet an American.

It was a far off place they'd heard of,

but - Oh, Americans here?

They couldn't believe it.

If you were a foreigner, they thought

you were from the of their own satellite countries.

They'd look at you and say, [SPEAKING RUSSIAN] -

in their own language.

And you say, No, Amerikanski.

They couldn't believe it.

Those people?

As much as we would say on this side, Russians?

Communists here in New York?

Your job was to take care of those pouches.

But I don't think we ever felt that somebody was threatening us

or trying to steal them, but we always have to assume that.

And that's why you took care of them.

MR. HOHMAN: I know sometimes as a newcomer,

we were tailed by the KGB and so on.

They were all very curious as to what you were doing.

They figured that you were more than just a diplomatic courier.

Occasionally you were able to speak to some Russians,

but it was very difficult to do so.

I had an incident also, coming out of a hotel in Moscow

where a young fellow got a hold of me,

and he spoke English quite well.

And it turns out that he was born in Brooklyn, New York.

And I, having been born in New York,

I was familiar with the area where he was located.

And he said that as a teenager his father picked up the family

and went to Russia.

They were originally from Russia, the family.

And there was this call out - Come back to Mother Russia

and rebuild the country.

You have your obligation, even though you're

an overseas Russian, and so on.

So he did that, and took his entire family.

This young fellow that I was talking to,

he lived outside of the city of Moscow.

But he said that they had the authority,

they had to have internal passports

and it gave the authority that at least

once a year he could come to Moscow

and he could be able to see the Lenin-Stalin mausoleum and so on,

and other sites and places there.

So he asked me if I would do a favor for him.

And I said, "What's the favor?"

He says, "Help me get into the American Embassy."

I said, "Well, just walk into it."

He says, "No.

There are militia guards out there

and they would restrain me from coming in."

He said,"I'm trying to get back to the United States.

I don't like this country.

They regard me as a traitor.

I hardly speak Russian.

And so speaking, I feel I'm an American from Brooklyn."

And he had a Brooklyn-ese type accent, too.

Which surprised me, that he wasn't

able to get into the embassy.

He said, "No, no.

Militia guards won't let me go in there."

And he said, "I've tried a couple of times

and they stopped me."

And I said, "Well, I'm sorry.

I can't help you either."

So, whether a case of entrapment or so on, I don't know.

A very sympathetic sort of arrangement too,

that he didn't have access to go back to the place of his birth.

Because it's part of our basic nature to help others,

even though they are strangers.

MR. CELLA: But it was fun, Moscow.

You'd try to enjoy it, because we were in there a lot.

I couldn't wait to get back to Helsinki.

That's another thing.

On a train, the difference -

how you notice when you cross the border into Russia.

There was just unending ending trees, roads

with nobody on them.

But then you'd come back and then

cross the border into Finland -

nice little houses with the smoke

coming out of the chimneys.

Everything nice and clean.

Huge, huge difference.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét