Auto news on Youtube Nov 4 2018

Most people struggle to answer the question,

"What is Bitcoin?," because there are so many different ways to respond.

First, Bitcoin is considered the first and the most widely used cryptocurrency.

A cryptocurrency is a completely digital, decentralized currency that is built using

principles of computer science, cryptography, and economics.

The term "Bitcoin" refers to the protocol governing this currency.

Second, bitcoin lowercase refers to the actual units of currency.

A Bitcoin user will say that they have a certain amount of bitcoins, similar to how we say

we have a certain amount of dollars when referring to the US Dollar.

Third, Bitcoin is the inspiration for the blockchain, which is the underlying data structure

of this cryptocurrency.

A data structure is a virtual format for organizing, retrieving, and storing information.

The Bitcoin blockchain in particular stores a permanent history of all transactions to

ever occur in the history of Bitcoin.

It is an append-only ledger, meaning that any information added to the ledger cannot

be deleted.

But most importantly, Bitcoin is a cultural revolution.

Rooted in ideals from Cypherpunks and libertarians, Bitcoin represents a shift towards privacy

and decentralization.

This cryptocurrency is not backed by any central organization, government, or company.

Instead, Bitcoin is built by the users, for the users.

As we said, Bitcoin was inspired by the Cypherpunk Movement

of the late 80s.

Cypherpunks advocate for the protection of privacy using cryptography.

They don't trust governments, corporations, or large organizations to respect privacy.

These points of centralization accumulate a great deal of power over society by collecting

unimaginable amounts of information from millions of users.

And the Cypherpunks were some of the first to be concerned about central entities stripping

away the freedom of the general public.

One massive point of centralization in modern day society is the financial system, where:

banks govern the economies of entire countries.

Several different companies and researchers attempted to make a decentralized or anonymous

currency, but all of them failed.

Bitcoin was the first technology to succeed as a cryptocurrency.

The Bitcoin whitepaper, or research paper, was published in October 2008 by Satoshi Nakamoto.

The whitepaper was a 9-page, concise proposal for the structure and function of a peer-to-peer

electronic currency.

Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym, or a false identity, of an individual or a group of individuals.

No one knows their real identity. However, what's important is that

this whitepaper envisioned a currency where users do not rely on financial intermediaries

or trust anyone in order to make transactions with each other.

In Bitcoin, users do not need to use their real world identities; instead, they are represented

by addresses, strings of random letters and numbers.

Bitcoin takes control out of the hands of third parties and gives users the freedom

to transact while protecting their privacy.

So how does Bitcoin do it? On a high level, the Bitcoin network validates transactions and stores the entire transaction history.

The Bitcoin network is a group of users communicating with each other as part of the Bitcoin protocol.

This network serves as the substitute for the central bank and must have certain properties

to function correctly.

Bitcoin is trying to create an open, accessible

cryptocurrency not subject to censorship or centralization.

But what are the problems?

Keep in mind the problems of trying to create an open, accessible cryptocurrency not subject

to censorship or centralization:

there are no central parties to ask for information about user accounts, and there are no central

parties to kick out or censor malicious users.

Decentralized networks generally suffer from these problems, leading to inconsistencies

between parties and malicious messages infecting the network.

The most popular attack is known as the double spending attack, an attack where some value

is used for more than it i's worth.

In real life, it's easy to prevent double spending: since dollar bills can't be copied

and pasted.

However, in digital currencies, there needs to be assurance that the virtual tokens have

not been promised to more than one person.

Bitcoin as a technology is trying to solve a very specific problem in the realm of distributed

systems: when any "node," or computer within the network, can come and leave as

it pleases and behave however it likes.

There are enormous possibilities for failures given the complete removal of centralization,

which is why there were so so many Bitcoin's predecessors to Bitcoin which failed.

So how does bitcoin solve these problems?

Bitcoin solves these problem through two things:

First, the blockchain, and the Proof-of-Work consensus protocol, both of which are Satoshi

Nakamoto's most popular and influential innovations.

Because of these two things, anyone with access to internet and a computer can join the Bitcoin

Network.

There are no banks or any equivalent of the Federal Reserve on the Bitcoin Network.

Instead, everyone can verify and audit the transaction history on their own.

And even the creation of money is decided not by a central authority, but through the

process of mining, of Proof-of-Work.

For more infomation >> [CS198.1x Week 1] What is Bitcoin? - Duration: 6:39.

-------------------------------------------

What came out before the Big Bang? - Duration: 6:41.

hey guys this is space train you are Dan Lee expressed till the edge of this

space and today we will talk about what came before the Big Bang grab your

ticket and let's go

don't forget to subscribe to get unlimited pass on our expedition

before there were humans dinosaurs walked the earth before there was an

earth there was just a big cloud of gas and dust floating out in the universe

before there was a universe well before that is a point that physicists spill a

lot of ink over we don't know what happened before the Big Bang gave birth

to the universe but the smartest people in science have plenty of fascinating

theories the ideas differ sometimes wildly but they all pretty much agree

that the Big Bang at least happens if you want to see more about Big Bang

Theory check our other video how did the universe begin you can find link down

below so the Big Bang Theory says that our universe began as a point of

infinite gravity and density called a singularity then in a trillionth of a

trillionth of a trillionth of a second it exploded outward doubling and

redoubling and red doubling in size at a rate faster than the speed of light in a

phenomenon physicists call inflation ordinarily nothing can go faster than

the speed of light this was an expansion of space itself though so it allowed to

bend the rules so the Big Bang happened one thing led to another and now you're

here but we're concerned with everything that happened before that what caused

that singularity in the first place for an explanation to have staying power it

needs to solve a few problems physicists have been puzzling over the biggest one

the universe has surprisingly low entropy a technical term for disorder an

ice cube has low entropy for example because the water molecule

and that are arranged in an orderly way once that ice melts those molecules are

going to spontaneously reform themselves into a cube everything goes in the

direction of disorder never the reverse but if that's the case the universe

should be a uniform distribution of disorganized subatomic particles

how did atoms ever form molecules how did clouds of gas and dust form stars

and planets and galaxies the only explanation is that the universe had

even lower entropy at its birth than it does today but how here are a few of the

leading contenders for what happened before the Big Bang number one an

earlier universe collapsed into the singularity that started our own this

idea known as the Big Bounce was first proposed in the 1960s by Princeton

researchers Robert dick and James Peebles some proponents of the idea say

that our universe is infinite going through a never-ending cycle of collapse

and expansion and that means we're just waiting for another collapse

critics say the principles of entropy don't allow a universe to collapse into

a singularity and out again and proponents admit it would require some

new physics to make sense but as we will see so do many other pre Big Bang

Theory's number two the universe was hibernating until something set it in

motion this idea says that the pre Big Bang universe was a small flat

high-pressure space that was metastable or stable until it found an even more

stable state the way a house of cards might sit perfectly solid forever until

a breeze came through at some point that breeze did come through he stopped being

metastable inflating into the universe we know this theory doesn't break the

laws of entropy but it doesn't explain entropies issues with our current

universe either number three there was never a singularity instead all the

energy in the universe was bound in the fabric of space known as the inflation

hypothesis this idea says that fluctuations in this so-called inflaton

field led to a huge swell of energy in one patch of the

field which made it expand incredibly quickly that exponential growth spurt

would leave evidence behind in the form of primordial gravitational waves not

the big ones discovered by LIGO in 2015 but tiny imprints in the Cosmic

Microwave Background in other projects including the bicep2 experiment have

been searching for we may not have found evidence for this one yet but most

cosmologists think it does the best job of explaining the universe's low entropy

along with a few other cosmic quirks number four we are just one universe in

the multiverse this theory is an offshoot of the inflation hypothesis and

says that the elements that lead to inflation also lead to the creation of a

bunch of smaller low entropy universes unfortunately all of those universes

would be closed off from one another so we never be able to detect them

that's unsatisfying to some scientists for obvious reasons scientists think the

Big Bang is an idea that does a good job of describing the history of the

universe however the idea is not perfect we don't know why the universe expanded

so quickly in the first second and then slowed down we don't know why the

expansion of the universe is speeding up now we don't know why we have a certain

number of forces that control the universe and we don't know what started

the Big Bang it will take some time before we will find out answers or

someone will come out with a better explanation of creation but for now it's

best theory we have and best explanation of time before the Big Bang is that

there was nothing at all but came something start from nothing let's

figure out that in our next video and don't forget to comment what do you

think what was there before Big Bang there are lots of questions left so

don't space out and live some space in your brain for answers I hope you

enjoyed this video if you want to see more subscribe and click the bell button

to get notifications on our latest videos if you are still here grab your

knowledge and get out of my train

For more infomation >> What came out before the Big Bang? - Duration: 6:41.

-------------------------------------------

Arsenal fans are loving what Matteo Guendouzi did before the Liverpool game - Duration: 1:50.

 Matteo Guendouzi is already a popular figure amongst Arsenal fans following his superb start to life in north London this season

 The French teenager arrived in the summer as the least heralded of the club's signings but immediately made a name for himself with some impressive performances in pre-season

 And he then took that early form into the Premier League campaign and was voted the club's player of the month for August after a series of excellent performances

 Unfortunately the red card he was shown against Blackpool in midweek ruled him out of featuring against Liverpool on Saturday night at the Emirates, but Guendouzi was determined to enjoy himself anyway

 So instead of hiding away before the game, he took a walk around the Emirates with some friends and even stopped to chat with several fans outside the ground

 And as you can imagine, that was very well received by those who spotted the midfielder ahead of kick-off

Here's a selection of what was said on social media. Keep up to date with the latest news, features and exclusives from football

london via the free football.london app for iPhone and Android. Available to download from the App Store and Google Play

For more infomation >> Arsenal fans are loving what Matteo Guendouzi did before the Liverpool game - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

What Chelsea fans did to Man Utd boss Jose Mourinho is wrong... 'it's disappointing' - Duration: 3:11.

 The match was marred with controversy after Ross Barkley scored a 96th minute equaliser

 Man United had come from behind to lead 2-1 thanks to two second half strikes from Anthony Martial

 But the former Everton midfielder stopped Jose Mourinho from winning at Stamford Bridge for the first ever time as United boss

 Chelsea's technical assistant Marco Ianni celebrated the equaliser right in front of the Portuguese boss, sparking a touchline scuffle

 Mourinho then felt the brunt of the home supporters, prompting him to hold three fingers up to the crowd in reference to the three Premier League titles he won as Blues boss

 According to Peter Crouch, Chelsea fans were in the wrong and disrespected their former boss

 "I know he manages Manchester United now and I know he is a figure that people love to hate but he is also a Chelsea legend," Crouch told the Mail

 "This is the man who won three league titles and helped turn Chelsea into the club they are today

 "What he was confronted with when he came back to London recently seemed disappointing for a man who achieved so much there

 "I hope one day in the future - maybe when he has moved on from Old Trafford - that Mourinho will again be viewed by Chelsea fans in the way they regard [Frank] Lampard

 "There needs to be recognition for what he has done." Lampard returned to Chelsea in midweek as manager of Derby as his side were beaten 3-2 in the Carabao Cup

 The all-time leading goalscorer received a warm welcome, one that was very different to Mourinho's according to Crouch

 "It was fascinating to watch the Carabao Cup tie between Chelsea and Derby on Wednesday, not least because of the ovation Frank Lampard was given," the Stoke striker added

 "Of course, it was always going to be emotional for him to return to Stamford Bridge

 "He won everything there is to win with Chelsea, he's the club's all-time leading scorer and the word legend perfectly describes his standing with supporters

 "But I couldn't help think about the difference between the reception he received compared to the way Jose Mourinho was treated a few weeks earlier

"

For more infomation >> What Chelsea fans did to Man Utd boss Jose Mourinho is wrong... 'it's disappointing' - Duration: 3:11.

-------------------------------------------

COVERT AND OVERT NARCISSISM - WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? | Video by Psych-Minded - Duration: 6:30.

Welcome back to Psych-Minded. I'm your host Kalley Marie and today we're gonna

be talking about the difference between covert narcissism and overt narcissism.

Welcome back to Psych-Minded! If you haven't yet subscribed, please hit the

subscribe button so you'll never miss a video on Mental Health and psychology.

If you are a new subscriber, thank you so much for being here. There have

been so many of you that have joined me in the last couple months and it has

been absolutely overwhelming. I am so happy to have you here. I hope you enjoy

what you are seeing. If you have any video requests please let me know in the

comments, on Instagram -- you know where to find me.

I love taking your video requests so please don't be shy and don't hesitate

to ask me if there's a specific subject you want to know more about. Today we're

gonna be talking about narcissism and specifically the difference between overt

narcissism and covert narcissism. Before we dive into this, I want to clarify -- when

we talk about narcissism, it can get a little tricky because we can have people

that have narcissistic tendencies but then we also have people that have the

narcissistic personality disorders. So just because somebody exhibits

narcissistic tendencies doesn't necessarily mean that they have a

full-blown personality disorder. When we talk about overt versus covert

narcissism today, I want you to keep that in mind. This can apply to either

somebody who has the trait or somebody who has the disorder. Hopefully it

will make more sense as we go along but first we're just gonna dive into what a

narcissist is. According to the DSM-5, narcissistic

personality disorder is characterized as a grandiose sense of self. The individual

is preoccupied with their ideals and their values and themselves. They believe

that they are the number one, end-all be-all. They are essentially never wrong

in their views and generally believe that they are the best. They can lack

empathy and believe that they deserve an excessive amount of admiration. That's

sort of one end of the spectrum of a narcissistic personality disorder where

we can see there's a lot of factors going on that are contributing to the

personality disorder. When it comes to just the trait of narcissism we do

see that in narcissistic personality disorder but we also know people

that can just be narcissistic without necessarily having a disorder. So we're

gonna go into what those different types are. The first one we're gonna talk

about is an overt narcissist and an overt narcissist is the one that we typically

see as being the stereotypical narcissist. They're very forward

and extroverted about how they feel about themselves. They make no shame in

trying to hide what they feel about themselves and that they believe that

they deserve this sort of pedestal treatment. An overt narcissist isn't

gonna make any attempts to try to hide or keep their feelings about themselves

a secret. They truly believe there are the best and they let everyone know it.

The other type is a covert narcissist. This is the type of

narcissism that sometimes is difficult to recognize. This is the more secretive

or introverted -- basically hidden sort of narcissism. We're gonna dive a

little bit more into what covert narcissism is because I think a lot of

us are pretty good at identifying when people are over narcissist

but the covert is a little

bit more difficult to detect. I'm gonna dive into some research I found

and some of my own thoughts on what covert narcissism is all about.

Individuals with covert narcissism tend to be more introverted like I mentioned.

They're still pretty proud and argumentative and defensive but they

tend to keep their feelings about themselves a little bit under the

surface; a little bit closer to the belt. They come across more passive-aggressive

and have a lower sense of self-worth than somebody with overt narcissism.

In a lot of ways a covert narcissist is still very much all about their own ego

but it's in a negative way. It's not in a "I'm amazing.. I'm grand...

I am perfect," kind of way. It's sort of an inflated sense of self surrounding these

negative attributes that they feel about themselves. So they're still inflating

their ego but they're doing so in sort of a negative

kind of way.Someone with covert narcissism may play the victim to

get attention. That's one of the key characteristics that they found with

this. Someone with overt narcissism might try to go for class

president or another role that's really in the spotlight. Whereas somebody with

covert narcissism is going to do something a little bit different to try

to get that same attention. What are some of the myths about covert

narcissism? Covert narcissism does not necessarily mean that somebody is

sneakier or more manipulative than someone with overt narcissism nor does

it mean that they're better at hiding their narcissistic behaviors. This is

just a way that the narcissism is presented. It has to do with how these

tendencies in this individual whether they have narcissistic personality

disorder or they just have narcissistic traits -- it's sort of how they manifest

themselves. Just like with any other trait if someone feels jealous or they

feel an intense amount of depression, those are going to manifest differently

for different people. They found with narcissism it sort of comes about in one

of these two ways either you have somebody who is playing the grandiose

role or you have someone who's playing the victim to get attention.

Someone with covert narcissism may also have these grandiose aspirations for

themselves or believe that they should be put on pedestals but they're just too

shy to navigate it. They're not really sure how to meet their goals or how to put

themselves out there. So whether an individual has narcissistic personality

disorder or is simply narcissistic you may see their narcissism manifest in one

of these two ways. I wanted to point out the difference because mental

illness can manifest in a lot of different ways for different people and

if we're struggling in ourselves to kind of figure out what's going on or looking

at someone else and trying to help them, this can be really helpful to know that

there are variations within narcissism or within traits that we find within

ourselves. What do you think about overt in covert narcissism? Let me know in the

comments below. Don't forget to subscribe and like this video!

I will see you guys next time

BYE! :)

For more infomation >> COVERT AND OVERT NARCISSISM - WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? | Video by Psych-Minded - Duration: 6:30.

-------------------------------------------

Why Eddie Howe is good enough for Premier League big six - Duration: 4:53.

Bournemouth started with more zip, intensity and direction than Manchester United

But when United matched their intensity in the second half, it was Jose Mourinho rather than Eddie Howe who had the better individual quality to win the game

Alexis Sanchez was a real threat and Marcus Rashford made his point by coming off the bench to score

That's the big dilemma for Eddie, one of the brightest young coaches in world football

I am sure he's totally sincere in his love for Bournemouth, but the reality is there will always be a ceiling as to what he can achieve there, and in my view he's good enough to manage any club in the Premier League

Eddie would never advertise himself but it's only normal for a player or manager to be ambitious

He's helped Bournemouth progress every season in the Premier League and it's only a matter of time before he gets a new kind of offer

If I was a Spurs fan and Mauricio Pochettino left, I wouldn't mind having Eddie as the next man in

He has a lot of the same qualities that Poch has, including the development of younger players

In reality, would a club the size of Manchester United ever go for a younger coach without European experience? I don't know, but I don't have any doubts about his attributes

Look at what he's achieved, season after season, and what was on show against United

He leads a team of high intensity, who have a work ethic that's hard to maintain over a long period of time

He makes individuals better and a team better collectively.David Brooks played No 10 on Saturday and looked a super talent

Others like Steve Cook, Charlie Daniels, Simon Francis have helped Bournemouth reach the top flight, and they've since shown they belong there under Howe's guidance

Bournemouth are fearless, they try to win games even against the biggest clubs like United, and showed good variation in play

Not a one-trick pony.I like Howe's personality as well.He's very humble and respectful of other managers

Modern players seem to respond better to a manager who conducts himself in a calm and reasonable way

I am sure he can make himself understood at times but it's not like he's a shouter as a default position

When will he move on? I don't know but football can move forward very quickly.Every club - United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Spurs - should be aware of his progress

Every managerial appointment is a risk to some extent but if I supported any of those clubs, I wouldn't be disappointed to have Eddie leading the team out

For more infomation >> Why Eddie Howe is good enough for Premier League big six - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

Salah was given a rather bizarre gift by female Liverpool fan at full-time last night - Duration: 3:27.

 Mohamed Salah didn't just break a Liverpool record on Wednesday night, he smashed it

 The Egyptian - who scored a brace during the 4-0 win over Red Star Belgrade - became the fastest player to score 50 goals for the Reds, beating the previous record set by Albert Stubbins back in the late 1940s by twelve games

 Is the Salah who scored 44 goals last season finally back?  Many fans and pundits were questioning Salah earlier this season after his slow start to the campaign

 But with three goals in his last two matches, Salah has certainly silenced a few critics

 One man that didn't have any doubts about his ability during his barren run was his manager Jurgen Klopp

 "The first goal he scored was genius little link-up play from Shaq, I don't know how he did that!" Klopp said of the Egyptian

"And that's it. It's good that we can maybe stop talking about [Salah's form).   "I was not in doubt, he was not in doubt, but if you are constantly asked about it then it's like something obviously is wrong, or people are not happy

"  While it was a record-breaking night for Salah, he was also involved in an odd exchange with a Liverpool fan at full-time

 The Liverpool fan held a sign that read: "I've come from Egypt for you, Salah."  And despite being substituted in the second-half, Salah went over to the fan and gave her his shirt

 But Salah also received something in return.  He looked confused at the gift - but what was it?  Well, according to the Daily Mail, it was a £42 box of Thornton chocolates

 How sweet.  Maybe it was a present for becoming the fastest Liverpool player to reach 50 goals

 Upon breaking the record, Salah admitted that he was "proud" of his achievements but insisted he was just glad the team earned all three points

 "That's great. I'm happy to score my 50th goal for Liverpool. I'm very proud about that," Salah said

 "It was an important game. We knew before the game that it was going to be tough

The most important thing for us is the three points - we are doing well now."  Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE: https://www

givemesport.com/writeforgms

For more infomation >> Salah was given a rather bizarre gift by female Liverpool fan at full-time last night - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

I asked what your 'why' is — here's my why - Duration: 5:59.

I did a video a couple of weeks ago, asking you what is your "why"?

Because having a why — a sense of purpose — is really important.

You need to know your why.

And if you didn't happen to see that video, I'll post a link to it at the end of this

video.

But as a result of that I was talking with a woman about that, and in the course of that

conversation, she asked me, what is my why?

And I thought, what a great question.

I've been doing these video for a while now, and I've done more than 70 of them,

and yet I have never talked about that.

So today, I want to introduce you to my why.

Carla Dearing.

My mother.

The woman whose memory inspires everything I do to try to help people with cognitive

loss.

Hi, I'm Tony Dearing of GoCogno.com, the website for people with mild cognitive impairment.

So I want to talk to you today about how I came to begin writing about cognitive impairment,

and I want to be very candid in saying that it was a journey that began from a place of

complete ignorance and profound sorrow.

It began with the death of my mother.

I've been thinking about her a lot lately because we're coming up on the fourth anniversary

of her passing away.

She was a remarkable woman.

She was a great mother.

She was a very successful businesswoman.

And she was a tireless community servant.

In fact, her whole life was devoted to service to other people.

You know, some people want to help, so they volunteer at the food bank.

Some people want to do a little more, so they might serve on the board of the food bank.

My mother founded the food bank.

She said, there are people going hungry in our community, we need to feed them, we don't

have a food bank, so she started it.

So when a woman that brilliant and that accomplished begins to slip, you see it.

There was something wrong with mom.

And we all watched it, and we watched it in dread and fear, hoping it wasn't what we thought

it was, but it was what we though it was, and she went through a long, agonizing period

of cognitive decline, she was diagnosed with a fairly uncommon form of dementia called

frontotemporal degeneration, and on December 7, 2014, she passed away.

I handled it, all of it, so poorly.

I knew nothing about brain health or dementia, and I was in denial.

I let that lack of knowledge and that fear paralyze me.

And after she passed away, I knew I had failed her.

I knew there was so much more that I could and should have done.

And every day for about six months after her death, I beat myself up.

And then one day, I just said, enough.

Something good has to come out of the loss of such a wonderful, brilliant woman.

And that day, I resolved that I was going to learn everything I could possibly learn

about brain health and cognition, and share it with anybody who might possibly benefit

from that information.

AS a journalist, I'm in a unique position to do that.

Whatever it is I want to know about, I can call the top expert in the country and talk

to them, and gain their knowledge and share their knowledge with you.

So that's what I do, on my website, and in my weekly brain health email, and in these

videos that I do every week.

So that's my why.

That's my purpose in life.

Every word I write is penned in the memory of my mother.

She's not here any more, but she's still here.

And in all the work I do, I feel her looking down on me, and I know approves.

So thank you for joining me today, and I'll be back next week to do what it is that I

do, which is to share with you scientifically proven information which you can use right

now, today, to give you the best possible chance of slowing cognitive decline, or perhaps

even halting it or reversing it.

I appreciate you listening to my why today, and I encourage you to find your own why.

If you didn't happen to see my video last week, I welcome you to watch it now, and you

can do that by clicking on that box up in the corner there.

I'll see you again next week.

Until then, as always, be kind to your mind.

For more infomation >> I asked what your 'why' is — here's my why - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

WHAT IS THIS? Creepy basement find! HAUNTED?!?! Serious! - Duration: 1:45.

Hey folks! BalanR here. This is gonna be a bit of a WTF video because I found

something in my basement this morning and I don't know what it is so I'm asking,

putting it out there, to see if anyone can help me. So I came down this morning

and I was moving this trunk and there was this sticky substance on it and it

was running down the top, running down the sides, and then there was a pool or a

couple pools on the floor, one of which I've already cleaned up. And it smells

like honey. I'm here in Massachusetts and I was looking online

to try and figure out what this could possibly be. I used a laser pointer to

shine it up to the ceiling and all I found were these little pods in between

the rafters, but I don't see any drip drippings coming from either side of

them. Then I found another spot over on the floor a few feet away. Anyway, if

you have any idea what this is, or what it could be from, I'd really appreciate your

help. Oh and ironically last night my other

half and I were watching the new Netflix original series "Haunted," which i think is

a little suspect, but if those things are happening to people then I certainly

feel terrible for them. I just found it a strange coincidence that this morning I

would come down and find this honey like substance on the floor and on the trunk.

And our house isn't haunted. Maybe

old, may have bugs, but haunted? I don't think so. Here are a few more pictures

of the pods. They're very small and it's hard to get into that spot because it's

between the rafters and here are a few more pictures of the honey as well.

Let me know what you think. If you can help out. If you have any idea what it is I'd

greatly appreciate it. Thanks so much for watching!

For more infomation >> WHAT IS THIS? Creepy basement find! HAUNTED?!?! Serious! - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

Jose Mourinho reveals what was 'awful' about Man Utd performance at Bournemouth - Duration: 2:42.

 United fell behind to Callum Wilson's stabbed finish after only 11 minutes at the Vitality Stadium

 They were level ten minutes before half-time through Anthony Martial, who scored his fifth goal in his last four Premier League games

 And Marcus Rashford nicked all three points right at the death, converting Paul Pogba's cross at the second attempt

 However, Mourinho was left fuming with his side's lacklustre defending. The hosts carved out a number of chances in the first-half, with goalkeeper David de Gea forced into seven saves throughout the match

 "It was the whole first half. I said at half-time I was the luckiest manager in the Premier League in a half when it should be like 5/6-2," Mourinho said

 "We were defensively awful. As a team we didn't press or do any of the work we did in the week

 "People watching this game will not believe how hard we worked this week. "The first half was a disaster

The second half was much better. "We created lots of chances and deserved to score before the 92nd minute

 Mourinho's decisions appeared to swing the momentum in his side's favour after half-time

 Summer signing Fred seemed to struggle with the pace of the game and the Red Devils boss acted swiftly by bringing him off for Ander Herrera just ten minutes after the break

 When asked what he said to his players at half-time, Mourinho added: "I started off positive

 "I said it is impossible to play worse than we did so the second half will be better for sure

I was happy bringing Ander Herrera into the game. "I felt we needed him to give more balance and to recover the ball faster

I was happy with that change. It was much better."