Thứ Tư, 28 tháng 11, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Nov 28 2018

Just a handful of days before Christmas 1977, the United States' Department of the Interior's

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released a thought-provoking paper.

It was focused on how, in theory, the world of officialdom might handle the situation

if it was proved that Bigfoot really exists.

And other mysterious animals too.The document had the following heading: Are We Ready For

'Bigfoot' Or The Loch Ness Monster?

I have presented for you the contents, without interruption.

It begins: "What if they really did find the Loch Ness monster or the legendary Bigfoot

of the Pacific Northwest?

Most scientists doubt that these creatures exist, but thoughts of the discovery of a

new species that might be the closest living relative to man, or the possibility of finding

a leftover dinosaur, excite the imagination of scientist and nonscientist alike.

It also poses another question: Would such a creature be subjected to the same kind of

exploitation as the giant movie ape, King Kong?

"Scientists generally believe there are still many species of birds and mammals that

have not been discovered because they live in remote areas and their populations are

limited.

After all, the gorilla and giant panda were only legends until the late 19th century when

their actual existence was first confirmed by scientists.

The komodo dragon, a 10-foot-long lizard, wasn't known to science until 1912.

The coelacanth, a deep-water prehistoric fish, was known only from 65 million-year-old fossils

until 1938 when a specimen was caught alive off the Madagascar coast.

Just last year a Navy torpedo recovery vessel dropped a sea anchor into 500 feet of water

off Hawaii.

But instead of a torpedo, it hauled up a 15-foot representative of a new species of shark.

The dead shark, named megamouth after its bathtub-shaped lower jaw, had an enormous,

short-snouted head and 484 vestigial teeth.

"To be sure, no remains of today' s legendary 'monsters' have ever been found.

There are no living specimens in zoos or dead ones in museums.

Most certainly, many "sightings" of these creatures are exaggerated or misinterpreted

reports, and some are downright hoaxes.

But finding a Loch Ness monster or Bigfoot is still a possibility, and the discovery

would be one of the most important in modern history.

As items of scientific and public interest they would surely command more attention than

the moon rocks.

Millions of curiosity seekers" and thousands of zoologists and anthropologists throughout

the world would be eager to "get at" the creatures to examine, protect, capture, or

just look at them.

"What would the United States Government do?

'I doubt well ever have to do anything, because I don' t believe there are any of

the things around to be discovered in the first place,' said Keith Schreiner, Associate

Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The Service is the Government agency with responsibility for protecting endangered and

threatened species.

'At least, we have the laws and regulations on the books to deal with newly discovered

species.'

"Schreiner acknowledged, however, that a good deal of international cooperation would

be needed if extremely rare species were found abroad.

And finding one on U.S. soil would pose serious problems too, Service officials agree.

Undisputed proof of a Bigfoot might cause an immediate, short-term problem no law could

handle.

Word of its discovery would be flashed around the world within hours.

Hysteria, fear, or panic might accompany the news in the area where the creature was located.

The throngs of curiosity seekers, would-be captors, and others wishing to find Bigfoot

would not only create a serious threat to the animal itself, but to public safety as

well.

Some officials doubt whether any State or Federal action short of calling out the National

Guard could keep order in the area within the first few hours or days of the creature'

s discovery.

This could be essential until a team of scientists could do the necessary things to ensure the

creature's survival.

"The key law in the preservation of a species is the Endangered Species Act, which pledges

the United States to conserve species of plants and animals facing extinction.

This broad, complex law protects endangered species from killing, harassment, and other

forms of exploitation.

The Act prohibits the import and export of, and interstate commerce in, endangered species.

American citizens cannot engage in commercial traffic in endangered species between nations,

even when the United States is not involved.

Scientists wishing to study endangered species are required to have a permit issued by the

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

"But before a creature can receive protection under the Endangered Species Act, a number

of actions normally must occur which involve recommendations from the public, scientists,

and State and foreign governments where the species exists.

The first of these would be the species' formal description and naming in a recognized

scientific publication.

In addition, if it were a U.S. species, the Governor of the State where it was found would

be contacted, as would the officials of foreign governments if it were found outside the United

States.

Only after much information was collected could the Service make a formal determination

as to whether the species should be afforded endangered or threatened status.

"For the Loch Ness monster, the first step has already been taken.

Last year, a highly respected British journal published a description and proposed the name

Nessiteras rhombopteryx, meaning 'awesome monster of Loch Ness with a diamond-shaped

fin.'

'Nessie,' as the creature is affectionately known by believers in its existence, has been

periodically sighted in Loch Ness, Scotland, over the last 14 centuries.

Loch Ness is a 2.5-mile-long, cold, deep lake whose peat-stained, murky waters make positive

identification of almost anything from photographs next to impossible.

But the most recent reports, based on sophisticated underwater cameras and electronic gear, identify

a 30-foot-long creature with a massive, humped body bearing a small head and long slender

neck with an immense set of flippers.

Although no presently known aquatic organism answers this description, it would fit any

of various species of prehistoric, carnivorous reptiles called plesiosaurs which lived 100

million years ago.

"In recent discussion in the British House of Commons, members of Parliament were assured

that if 'Nessie' were found it could theoretically receive immediate protection since it had

already been described and named.

If 'Nessie' were taken out of Britain illegally, it would be a violation of the

U.S. Lacey Act to bring it into the United States.

Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, is purported to be an 8-foot, 900-pound humanoid that roams

the forest and wilderness areas of the Pacific Northwest.

One 'eyewitness' described an obviously female Sasquatch as a 'tall, long-legged,

gorilla-like animal covered with dark hair and endowed with a pendulous pair of breasts.'

It, too, has been described in publications and given a scientific name.

In fact, so many people were stalking Bigfoot with high-powered rifles and cameras that

Skamania County, Washington, is prepared to impose a fine of $10,000 and a 5-year jail

term on anyone who kills a Bigfoot.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers even lists Bigfoot as one of the native species in its

Environmental Atlas for Washington.

This year the Florida and Oregon legislatures also considered bills protecting 'Bigfoot'

type creatures.

A Bureau of Indian Affairs policeman has 18-inch plaster cast footprints of the 'McLaughlin

monster,' a Bigfoot-type creature he saw last month in South Dakota.

"Under U.S. Law, the Secretary of the Interior is empowered to list as threatened or endangered

a species for 120 days on an emergency basis.

For endangered species in the United States, the Secretary can also designate habitat that

is critical to their survival.

No Federal agency could then authorize, fund, or carry out any activities which would adversely

modify that habitat.

So long-term Federal protection of Nessie or Bigfoot would basically be a matter of

following the same regulatory mechanisms already used in protecting whooping cranes and tigers.

"'Under normal situations,' Schreiner said, 'we must know a great deal about a

species before we list it.

How big is the population?

Does it occur anywhere else?

Is the population in danger of decline?

Is its habitat secure?

Is the species being exploited?

What is its reproductive rate?

Obviously, if a Bigfoot really were found we could use emergency provisions of the Act

to protect it immediately.

But for the record, I seriously doubt whether such a creature really does exist.'

Along with the hundreds of requests received last year to protect more well-known plants

and animals, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was queried about protection for Bigfoot and

the 'Lake Champlain sea serpent.'

"No requests have so far been received for the protection of the reputed foul-smelling

Noxie monster, a 7-foot denizen of Oklahoma, or the skunk ape of the Everglades, or the

infamous Mothman in West Virginia.

But in time, they, too, might come.

And when they do, they'll be treated accordingly."

For more infomation >> Strange Creatures and the U.S. Government - Duration: 11:04.

-------------------------------------------

▶️ RAF F-35B Fighter Jets To Exercise With US Fighter & France Fighter Jet - Duration: 2:12.

the exercises involves both an air-to-air and a surface-to-air threat

so it creates new challenges for the operators that are involved in the fight

because they will be threatened they're both from aircraft in the air but also

for a mr. systems on the ground and bringing that at a complex of complexity

into the exercise that really changes the way in which we would operate and

that is where the capabilities of the three air forces that are we taking

parts that can really make a difference I only had the f-35s in the Royal Air

Force particularly in the UK for a few months and for us to actually feel them

on this complex exercise is is a real step in the right direction for

capability it's mouth-watering for us to be alongside the French and the

Americans to integrate and to take this f-35 stealth airplane and integrate it

with the fourth-generation airplanes that we already have the RAF owls

typhoons the f-15s is a huge chance for us to go and actually develop the

capability

For more infomation >> ▶️ RAF F-35B Fighter Jets To Exercise With US Fighter & France Fighter Jet - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

America, Why Are You So Shitty? | Tear Gassing kids | GM Gives US The Finger - Duration: 6:27.

so now we're throwing tear gas at children

here's what I have to say about that

America why do you always have to be so fucking shitty like why why are we

always dicks to everyone like we're never gonna have that utopian world in

Star Trek if America keeps being dicks to everyone not to mention all the

fucking North Korea and China being dicks over there

but America we're supposed to set an example Oh so

every child that's what the migrant was stolen none of them belong to the person

that to the adult that they're with and they're using those kids as human

shields is that right Christian now even if there was proof of that the thing

about human shields is you wouldn't need one if you weren't being attacked by

something right this was kind of shit that just makes the world hate us even

more why do we always have to be dicks I mean we're letting the dumbest dick

run the fucking White House and do and say whatever the fuck he wants to say

bruh he's fuckin damn near 80 who let's their great grandpa be on

the Internet these days take the fucking phone away from him why the fuck can't

anyone control this a dumb ass anyways

minor form of tear gas my ass

and now you want Mexico transport all the migrants back to the

countries that they're escaping from like be realistic

they couldn't even they were being overwhelmed at the border before the

fucking tear gas incident started and yet you want them to figure out how to

logistically get all these 8,000 people back to essentially their deaths that's

gonna happen the same way Mexico's gonna pay for the fucking border wall come on son

I had more to say but while I was looking up this shit like reading

these articles these fucking ads on these articles are a fucking joke like

bruh I was reading about I just read Trump like bitch tweeting about build

the border wall and then I see a fucking this fucking ad

they Congress build the border wall do we have a deal or no deal shit's hilarious

then I keep fucking scrolling and then I'm reading about how there's six

thousand immigrants crammed in shelters in Tijuana and then it's like

giving tuesday and a little black kid like a little ad of a little black like

black kid I guess supposed to be from Africa and givingtuesday giving back

whoever is in charge of these ads this ad placement is a dick it's fucking

hilarious what the tear gas shit that's just gonna keep happening because we

suck but GM why y'all gotta be so shitty hey I'm a Chevy girl to my core

I Drive Chevy I my family drive Chevy I will always Drive Chevy it's just in my

DNA cuz I'm an American girl driving an

American car is supposed to mean something but y'all don't give a fuck

about that so y'all are planning on closing five branches in the North

America the largest of which is in Canada where there's damn near 4,000

people who are gonna lose their jobs and they're doing this so that you can

invest a billion dollars into cruise which is a company that's working on or

working on building the next generation of automobiles that's all fine and dandy

like I understand you're trying to get ahead of it and be in the forefront of

the new generation of cars like that's fine and dandy but the problem I have is

I thought being an American icon should mean something you're choosing to close

branches in the United States and we'll throw Canada in, North America you're choosing

to close these branches here cuz you're getting rid of a bunch of sedans that

y'all have okay I got that but i me you could always build something else in these

warehouses no okay fine so being an American icon just doesn't mean anything

you're choosing to close these branches here but you're leaving in the branches

branches open in like Mexico and shit I don't give a fuck about Americans oh

right cheap labor how the fuck can I forget

about that cheap labor is always gonna come before hearing about your your

roots right caring about what you built your brand on cheap labor is always

gonna come first well shit I guess I'll see you all motherfuckers in the next

one don't forget to Like comment if you're butthurt and subscribe and hit

the notification bell I don't know when the fuck I'm gonna post videos I just do

it when shit like this happens thanks shitty America

For more infomation >> America, Why Are You So Shitty? | Tear Gassing kids | GM Gives US The Finger - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. files complaint to forfeit US$ 3.1 mil. from firms for helping N. Korea launder money - Duration: 0:36.

the united states have filed a complaint to forfeit over 3.1 million u.s. dollars

from three companies based in singapore and china for helping North Korea

launder money the US Justice Department says firms called apex choice and UN we

would and a Singapore based company that wasn't named laundered cash on behalf of

sanctioned North Korean banks the banks used the money to buy goods for the

regime and to illegally access the US financial market and this becomes the

fourth case of the u.s. forfeiting assets of foreign firms that violated

North Korea sanctions

For more infomation >> U.S. files complaint to forfeit US$ 3.1 mil. from firms for helping N. Korea launder money - Duration: 0:36.

-------------------------------------------

'Window of opportunity' is closing if N. Korea-U.S. stalemate continues: Biegun - Duration: 0:43.

Washington's special representative for North Korea Stephen beggin says the

window of opportunity is closing with North Korea on the nuclear issue if

Pyongyang continues to be ambiguous the seoul-based paper joon-young interval

reports that in a meeting with his South Korean counterpart earlier this month

beigen said that the North has not responded to American proposals for

high-level talks he's also reported to have said that

because of growing pressure on those in the US who want dialogue with the north

and with the Democrats taking over the lower house of Congress the Trump

administration cannot allow the stalling to go on despite the apparent stalemate

the State Department said Tuesday that it's still in frequent contact with the

north

For more infomation >> 'Window of opportunity' is closing if N. Korea-U.S. stalemate continues: Biegun - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

Home Built By State's First African-American Architect Given Historic Designation - Duration: 0:24.

For more infomation >> Home Built By State's First African-American Architect Given Historic Designation - Duration: 0:24.

-------------------------------------------

Human Experiments You'll Never Believe Happened | United States Germ Warfare Pre-1970 - Duration: 13:06.

Hey internet friends.

History is littered with tales of individuals devising new ways to kill each other.

Throughout the centuries, the deliberate use of bacteria, viruses, and toxins has been

proven as an effective means of neutralizing a targeted population—a practice that has

been dubbed "biological warfare". Fast forward to recent times--poisoning the

well with plague-ridden corpses just didn't quite cut it anymore, especially not for empires

whose culture is rooted in endless war.

After all, the war machine requires the latest and greatest—but while the bioterrorism

budget is booming, the pool of volunteers willing to test out the effectiveness of these

weapons is anything but.

That's why today we're going to blast back to the past and examine the lessons of

history, focusing on a handful of unethical human experiments (that we know about),

as well as the global government, organizations, and individuals who carried

out these barbaric experiments by means of deception— powerful entities still around

today, who demand the blind trust of the general populace, though the only established track

record they hold is one of total disregard for human life.

Today we're going to talk about a selection of horrific human experiments carried out

under the American flag… #1-The Filipino Prison Experiments

Found within the first book of Samuel in the Bible is the oldest account of what is speculated

to be the Bubonic Plague.

The story goes a little something like this: when the Philistines stole the Ark of the

Covenant from the Israelites, the Philistines were were afflicted by an epidemic of what

was later thought to be the plague—the symptoms affecting each town to which the ark of the

covenant was taken.

The link was established by mentions of what was later roughly translated to mean "rats"

and "buboes" or "tumors" and further established by the knowledge that humans can be infected

by fleas who have fed on infected rodents.

The Philistines returned the Ark of the Covenant in repentance, and offered five golden tumors

and five golden mice to end the plague, but that wouldn't be the last time that a disease,

thought to be naturally occurring, would be weaponized.

In the late 19th century, the United States military, along with universities, began medical

experiments on prisoners in the Philippines, which was, at the time, an American territory.

These experiments included injecting prisoners with the bubonic plague, beginning with five

select prisoners for the first round.

Later, Yale and Johns Hopkins University graduate, Professor Richard Strong, infected twenty-four

prisoners with what he reportedly thought to be cholera, but turned out to be somehow

contaminated with bubonic plague, killing thirteen of those prisoners—whoopsie daisy! Well,

to his credit, Dr. Strong argued that he was: "'thoroughly convinced' that man could withstand the

amount of plague organism as a guinea pig."

Dr. Strong was later found innocent of any criminal negligence, and he later had a thriving

career as professor of topical medicine at Harvard.

But his experiments on prisoners didn't end with accidental plague inoculations.

A few years later, he conducted another round of experiments dealing with Beriberi, a deficiency

disease resulting in paralysis and ultimately heart failure.

Although several prisoners died as a result, the remaining few were rewarded with cigars

and cigarettes—what a reward for narrowly escaping death, right?

So worth it.

(Sarcasm heavily implied.)

To make matters worse, its' not like these prisoners volunteered for these experiments

or even had the slightest clue as to what was going on, which begins our theme of non-existent

voluntary or informed consent—at least for this video.

#2- The Tuskegee Syphilis Study Conducted by the public health service in partnership with

the Rockefeller-funded Tuskegee Institute in 1932, the clinical study of untreated syphilis

targeted 600 African-American men—Alabama sharecroppers who believed they were receiving

free health care from the United States government.

Of the 600, 399 of those men had reportedly already contracted syphilis, a sexually transmitted

disease, before the study began, and the remaining men were purposely infected with the bacterium,

told they were being treated for "bad blood".

The projected six-month clinical study spanned over the course of forty years, and for many

of those men, clinicians followed them until their eventual deaths.

Though pencillin became the treatment of choice for syphilis in 1945, measuring the effectiveness

of treatments wasn't the goal of this study.

No, the goal of this 40-year study was to observe the consequences of untreated syphilis.

And, spoiler alert: while syphilis often presents with a painless red sore at the infection

site, when untreated, syphilis can cause damage to the internal organs, like the brain or

the heart, and progresses through stages serious enough to result in death.

It wasn't until much later that the horrors of the Tuskegee study surfaced, and a legal

settlement included a lifetime of…wait for it… medical benefits to the study subjects,

their wives, and children.

#3 The Devil's Experiments in Guatemala Dubbed the "devil's experiment" by Guatemalans,

a series of venereal disease experiments took place in Guatemala between 1946-1948 and was

led by physician James Charles Cutler who was also involved in the Tuskegee Syphilis

experiments.

The Guatemalan experiments involved infecting an estimated 1308 unsuspecting victims with

an STD, but this time, instead of just targeting African American men, the pool of victims

opened up to children as young as ten, mental patients, prisoners, prostitutes, and soldiers.

There were eighty documented deaths as a result. These experiments were reportedly conducted so researchers

could look for ways to prevent STD's from spreading, with their focus on stopping the

spread of diseases amongst soldiers at war.

Guatemala was chosen so doctors could avoid the pesky ethical constraints of informed

consent.

Studies show that a number of patients were infected with syphilis and brought to the

brink of death, only to test the effectiveness of penicillin as treatment.

Once treated, patients were infected with another STD, and the process started over

again.

Dr. Cutler acknowledged his ethical violations in 1947, stating, "Unless the law winks occasionally,

you have no progress in medicine." Since the United States owned up to these experiments

in 2010, there have been several lawsuits against the United States government, the

Rockefeller-funded Johns Hopkins University, and the Rockefeller Foundation to the tune

of 1 billion dollars in damages, but the real damage has yet to come to fruition, given

that there's no telling how many infected Guatemalan children and grandchildren of these

victims are running around right now, the reverberations and consequences of these experiments

resulting in a generational effects, given that mothers can pass syphilis to an unborn

child, and when left untreated, there's a high risk of stillbirth or infant death.

Beyond the threat of lawsuits, those who conducted these experiments got nothing more than a

slap on the wrist, if that!

The Rockefeller Foundation is still just as influential as before, steering the medical

field as it deems fit, because deep pockets have sway and can even rewrite history.

If knowledge of unethical human experimentation was commonplace, and everyone knew that the

major pharmaceutical companies of today were the heads of the United States biological

warfare program of days past, like George Merck of Merck and Co—now a major vaccine

maker—if individuals held this knowledge, would they still accept inoculations without

asking their doctor or researching what they're putting into their bodies first?

When I see recent headlines about how syphilis cases are at an all-time high, it makes me

wonder how organic of an occurrence that is, and how much of the problem has been created

to strike fear and outrage in the masses so that a manufactured solution, like a vaccine,

can be introduced to create profit.

A solution with its own host of problems, a solution concocted by those with a sordid

history, unworthy of your blind trust, as they have a proven track record of disregard

for human life.

#4 Ohio Penitentiary Cancer ExperimentsA man who eventually became the Vice President of

the American Cancer Society began his reign of terror in an Ohio State Penitentiary in

1952.

Chester Southam, a Sloan-Kettering Researcher, which, unsurprisingly was also funded by the

Rockefeller Foundation (I know I sound like a broken record at this point)—anyway (!) Southam

sought to discover how healthy bodies fought the invasion of malignant cells, so he injected

live cancer cells into prisoners, as well as 300 healthy women at Sloan-Kettering, all

of whom were not informed of Southam's extracurricular research.

However, at that time, fellow doctors were fully aware that injection of live cancer

cells might cause cancer, even in healthy individuals.

Nearly a decade later, Southam set his sights on twenty-two elderly patients at a chronic

disease hospital in Brooklyn, injecting them with live cancer cells—all without their

consent.

Why?

Well he wanted to test his hypothesis of course!

His hypothesis that bodies "racked with serious but non-cancerous diseases would reject

live cancer cells as rapidly and completely as healthy bodies".

This time, a few whistle blower colleagues came forward, refusing to participate in Southam's

experiments and ultimately resigning.

Southam's unethical practices eventually made headlines and even saw the inside of

a courtroom.

And his punishment?

Brace yourselves for this one, it's a real doozy.

The New York medical licensing board put him on probation for…a year.

#5 Operation Sea Spray During the world wars, the funding of the United States biological

weapons programs increased and continued well into the Cold War.

In 1950, a secret experiment was conducted by the US Navy in an effort to test the vulnerability

of susceptible regions of the United States in the event of a biological attack.

The Navy sprayed clouds of Serratia bacterium from a giant hose for two miles along the

San Francisco Bay coastline, successfully dosing nearly eight hundred thousand residents

during the week of spraying, all unbeknownst to the general population.

Though the navy claimed the bacteria was harmless, the reality is that it can cause urinary tract

and wound infections in some, as well as gastrointestinal and respiratory issues in others.

In the week following operation sea spray, eleven adults checked into the hospital with

serious UTIs linked to the bacteria, and one man even died as a result.

Furthermore, An increase in pneumonia in the Bay Area was later speculated to have been

linked to Operation Sea Spray . The results of the experiment?

San Francisco Bay was identified as highly susceptible to biological attacks due to its

iconic fog.

Pentagon reports that were declassified decades later revealed that the military had performed

open-air testing of biowarfare agents an estimated 239 times across American cities like New

York City, Panama City and Key West from 1950 to 1966.

Other reports detailed the release of deadly nerve agents over Alaska and dousing Hawaii

with bacteria, and the experiments weren't limited to the United States populace, but

extended all the way to Canada and Great Britain.

After these reports were declassified, the Defense Department admitted that the tests

weren't exactly harmless, and due to the exposure to deadly chemicals and bacteria,

soldiers and civilians alike have suffered serious health ramifications.

It was in 1969 that President Richard Nixon issued an executive order to end all US offensive

biological weapons programs, and supposedly all US stockpiles were destroyed by 1972.

However, as you'l see in my upcoming videos, experimentation on human guinea pigs certainly

didn't end in 1969, nor was it limited to germ warfare.

Now, if you're someone who has watched this video all the way through and is hammering

away on your keyboard right now to make the argument that despite how unethical and brutal

these experiments in this video were, the results provided pharmaceutical companies,

physicians, and the military with information they needed—before you comment that, I'd

like to ask you something:Are you willing to volunteer yourself, your mother, your father,

or your children as test subjects for the next round of experiments?Thank you so much

for watching, internet friends.

You know I always enjoy reading your comments.

Thank you for subscribing and supporting my channel on Patreon.

I'll see you soon in my next video.

Bye!

For more infomation >> Human Experiments You'll Never Believe Happened | United States Germ Warfare Pre-1970 - Duration: 13:06.

-------------------------------------------

The sad and bizarre history of the U.S. Army Camel Corps - Duration: 5:09.

The United States Army accidentally set

feral camels loose on the wild west in the 1800s.

They literally became beasts of burden,

menacing the countryside.

And this was also during a time when many Americans

had never heard of a camel, let alone seen one,

so encounters with the hunchbacked dromedaries

incited legends and horror stories.

One creature, known as the Red Ghost,

was described as a "devilish looking creature

"strapped on the back of some strange-looking beast."

The Red Ghost was said to have killed multiple people

and even had the power of disappearing into thin air.

The truth of this animal

was actually far more disturbing than that.

But let's begin at the beginning,

with the United States Army's Camel Corps.

The terrain and the climate of the Midwest,

Pacific Crest deserts and mountain ranges,

and Texas, just all of Texas -

if you've been there you know what I'm talking about -

were nearly insurmountable for settlers,

and certainly not without costs.

Remember the Oregon Trail?

Remember dysentery?

In 1836, U.S. Army Lieutenant George H. Crosman

proposed the establishment of a camel corps

to help transport supplies.

He submitted an extensive report to the War Department

advocating for the use of camels to help shoulder burdens

while requiring less food or water than horses.

His report was disregarded, but not forgotten.

Camel Corps.

Never forget.

We should make that a t-shirt.

♪ Ah ♪

- [Man] One hump or two?

- Two, obviously.

Inappropriate.

In 1855, then Secretary of War

and champion of Crosman's proposal,

Senator Jefferson Davis of Mississippi,

appealed to Congress again and was granted $30,000

for the "purchase and importation of camels

and dromedaries to be employed for military purposes."

In perhaps the Navy's finest moment,

the store ship the USS Supply brought 34 frickin' camels

to the United States.

In an early test of the animals' capabilities though,

a traditional three-wagon team, each pulled by six mules,

was pitted against six camels to perform a supply run.

According to ArmyHistory.org, the wagon teams,

each carrying 1800 pounds of oats,

completed the trip in five days.

The camels however, carried 3,648 pounds of oats

and made the trip in only two days.

With several other favorable tests,

it was time to become acquainted with camels.

Though naturally docile,

camels can get violent when mistreated,

and they're strong enough to kick or stomp someone to death.

Which is what you get when you're mean to animals.

A second import of the creatures brought the total to 75,

but they would all be lost or auctioned off

within the decade.

But it wasn't the mission or the climate

that would end the experiment.

It wasn't even the fierce objections or political fallout

from the mule lobby, which was a thing -

god our country is fascinating -

it was the Civil War that would kill off the Camel Corps.

After Texas seceded from the Union,

Confederates seized Camp Verde,

where the camels were stationed,

and the camels were turned loose.

Some were reclaimed by Union forces, some sold at auction,

some met really s****y ends because humans are the worst

and I don't even want to go into details about it,

and some were left to wander the wild, wild west.

Which brings us back to the Red Ghost.

After months of sightings,

one might even call them hauntings,

the Red Ghost was spotted by a group of miners

who took aim at the creature.

Marshall Trimble, Arizona's official state historian,

told the Smithsonian that when the Ghost fled their gunfire,

"something shook loose and landed on the ground."

That something was a human skull.

Years later, a rancher would finally kill the poor beast.

The New York Sun reported that strips of rawhide

were wound and twisted along the creature as if something

or someone had been lashed on to the camel's back.

Accounts of camel sightings continued for decades,

wandering the deserts and plains of California,

the Southwest, Northwest,

and even as far away as British Columbia.

Topsy, believed to be the last

of the Army Camel Corps creatures,

died in Griffith Park at the Los Angeles Zoo in 1934

at the old age of 81.

Know any other stories about animals in the armed forces

like to 440 bear who served in the Polish Army

during World War II.

Let us know your favorites

and we might make a video about it next.

Just, I need them to have a happy ending.

Can you guys just give me stories,

nevermind.

Nevermind, I'm not even gonna finish that sentence.

(laughing)

Yes, please leave a comment and me stories

with a happy ending.

Thanks.

Ah.

Okay, I think we're done here. (laughing)

Camel Corps #inappropriate.

It's gold, it's gold.

The shirt will spit.

You can spit while wearing the shirt.

I'll spit on every shirt that's ordered,

I don't know, you guys.

We can't go wrong.

That's weird.

For more infomation >> The sad and bizarre history of the U.S. Army Camel Corps - Duration: 5:09.

-------------------------------------------

Trump vows to stop caravan from entering US - Duration: 9:34.

For more infomation >> Trump vows to stop caravan from entering US - Duration: 9:34.

-------------------------------------------

PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE (PrSM) - U.S ARMY's WEAPON - Duration: 5:53.

There is a high probability that U.S will pull out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear

Forces Treaty (INF Treaty) in coming days.

The president recently told reporters, "We'll have to develop those weapons.

We're going to terminate the agreement and we're going to pull out."

He had earlier said, "If Russia's doing [it], and China's doing it, and we're adhering to

the agreement, that's unacceptable," If the U.S ultimately withdraws from INF Treaty,

many missile systems will be inline to have the range upgrades.

In this video, Defense Updates analyzes why the U.S Army's Precision Strike Missile

will be America's answer to Russia & China post withdrawal from INF Treaty?

Let's get started

INF Treaty was signed by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987.

It banned ground-launch missiles with ranges from 500 km to 5,500 km.

The INF Treaty eliminated around 2,700 nuclear and conventional missiles, as well as their launchers.

This was achieved by May 1991.

This included short-range missile with 500–1,000 km (310–620 mi) range and intermediate range

missile with 1,000–5,500 km (620–3,420 mi) range.

The treaty had provisions for 10 years onsite inspections.

INF Treaty went a long way in ending the serious standoff between U.S Pershing and cruise missiles

and Soviet SS-20 missiles in Europe.

It should be noted that the treaty does not cover sea-launched missiles.

On November 29, 2017, speaking at the Wilson Center, National Security Council official

Christopher Ford had revealed that the weapon violating the INF Treaty was the Novator 9M729,

having NATO designation of SSC-8

As per The United States, NOVATOR 9M729 is land-based and has a range between 500 km

to 5,500 km depending on fuel load and warhead used.

This makes the missile violate the terms of the INF treaty.

The 9M729 is capable of hitting targets throughout Western Europe with tactical nuclear warheads

in the event of a conflict.

This missile, in particular, has prompted U.S strategists to rethink on INF Treaty.

The INF Treaty already had much opposition in America's power circle.

Harry Harris, the former commander of U.S. Pacific Command who is now U.S. ambassador

to South Korea is one of them.

. In testimony submitted to Congress last year,

Harris pointed several important aspected.

He noted that China is not a signatory of any treaty like this and used it to develop

a large arsenal of missiles.

As per him, Chinese Rocket Forces has more than 2,000 ballistic and cruise missiles,

almost 95% of which would violate the INF treat if China was a signature.

He said, "Over the past two decades, China has developed numerous ground and air launched

missile systems that far outrange U.S.systems.

They have done this at a fraction of the cost of some of our more expensive systems.

Constrained in part by our adherence to the INF treaty, the U.S. has fallen behind in

our ability to match the long-range fires capabilities of the new era."

Currently, U.S Army uses MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATacMS).

Army Tactical Missile System is a surface-to-surface missile manufactured by the American company

Lockheed Martin.

It has a range of over 100 miles (160 km), with solid propellant.

U.S is already working towards a system that will have a range of 499 km just below the

500 km range restricted of the INF Treaty.

The program is designated as Precision Strike Missile or PrSM.

The Army had selected two competitors several years ago — Raytheon and Lockheed Martin

— to build prototypes for the PrSM program.

Testing of these prototypes is expected begins in the middle of next year.

But will imminent withdrawal from INF Treaty, the missile could be developed to have far

greater range.

Col. John Rafferty, the director of PrSM program, in a meeting with reporters at the Association

of the U.S. Army's convention, said

"We're going to play by the rules until we're told the rules have changed.

That's our approach on the team and the guidance from senior leaders".

He added, "We have worked with our industry partners

to determine what is the feasibility going farther than 499 kilometers and we believe

that it's entirely possible to go further with the current [PrSM] missile…

Our discussions about advanced propulsion leads us to believe that inside the same form

factor, with a change in propulsion, we could go significantly farther."

Viewers may note that the U.S Army is pushing toward a replacement for the Army Tactical

Missile System with PrSM by 2023, which is much earlier than the initial timeline of 2027.

For more infomation >> PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE (PrSM) - U.S ARMY's WEAPON - Duration: 5:53.

-------------------------------------------

Jim Throws a Party for Fellow Soon-to-Be U.S. Citizens - The Jim Jefferies Show - Duration: 5:07.

Welcome back.

Before the break, we just met a few of the people

who are about to become U.S. citizens.

I sat down with them to talk about

what it means to become an American.

>> Decide to throw a party to celebrate

my fellow soon to be U.S. citizens.

Because the Zardes trans fats

there's nothing more American than a backyard barbecue

called Pinda gonna Charlton Heston.

And says

Oh my gosh how do I feel about the president's bullshit.

It was time for me to talk about my biggest trump

immigrant to immigrant.

>> The whole time I was on a TV show doing Trump jokes.

I was always like I hope he doesn't watch this

because I think.

I think he's petty enough to have going.

What's your favorite thing about America.

>> We're exposed to a lot of different ideologies here.

Man like freedom is based on who you are the ideas

and the knowledge that you are exposed to.

You know it starts to open your mind

to start seeing the world differently.

>> For me it's the waterparks Australia

is a pretty free place.

It's the waterparks a much bigger hey

I think you know somebody like me

I wanted to go to college and I was afforded to get paid

that off you know at the of the bright.

Spots. >> Perfect. As a matter of fact.

>> There's a hell of a lot wrong with the way immigrants

are optimistic about being here and want our voices heard.

The first thing I'm going to do first thing I'm going to do

is I'm going to register your rights and responsibilities

as a citizen like the second or third bullet

points to be an informed voter.

And I think like. Them. Palestinian with a peeping tom.

>> That I lived here before 9/11.

>> Did you find that there was a shift in the way

that people treated you as an immigrant after 9/11.

>> Xenophobia was on tape.

We lived in Texas during the time

and you know the South is a little slower and slower

but that's stupid.

>> So hard to explain to people where I'm from I'm Palestinian.

Where's that Israel. What do you mean.

Oh are you sure you're not Mexican.

And I was not.

And then after 9/11 I was like yeah not Mexican.

They were like No you're not. I know.

>> That's the beauty of America. You can be discriminated against

if you are Muslim or Mexican from your homeland.

>> Do you miss that America doesn't do well at all.

>> For me it's avocado toast and I was eating at work

in honor of my course.

Oh with a hipster food here all my life and you know

I was raised eating avocado and fresh bread the bread

he sucks is fruit Red Sox dry and bread

is so good that bread in America sucks.

>> Want Dileep.

Put that on a bit of and resembled a game

changer game changer. Fantastic but it changed it.

Brilliant. You just put it on sandwiches on a cracker.

>> A lot of people overlook the fact that immigrants

bringing their cultures he is what makes America great.

>> Immigrants create more small businesses

than U.S. born Americans.

One in 10 Americans are employed.

>> By a business owned by an immigrant.

Do you ever get offended or offended at the idea

that immigrants all we do is we come here and we take.

Obviously you're putting as much or more back into it.

>> I feel like American culture wouldn't exist

without immigrants and immigration.

>> Basically unless you are a Native American you know

it's like your family migrated here.

You have no right to to single out people

and call people out for being an immigrant.

>> You always make like the Americans

that are like storage's like I always do

when people were here like my parents.

>> Well I'm half German half Dutch.

>> I'll be honest I once we're all sworn in

I should build the wall right. Pull up the.

>> Know they do build the wall

and I'm going to open up a ladder and ryper store.

>> Dear America we accept the fact

that we have to jump through hoops

to become a citizen of your wonderful

yet sometimes for nice.

But you can see the why you want to see us.

Because what we found out is that each one of us

is a class musician a and.

A non profit sort of got drunk stand up comedian.

Sincerely yours The New Americans club .

For more infomation >> Jim Throws a Party for Fellow Soon-to-Be U.S. Citizens - The Jim Jefferies Show - Duration: 5:07.

-------------------------------------------

FNN: White House, State Dept. Briefings; Senate Committee Hearings; LA chase - Duration: 9:45:15.

For more infomation >> FNN: White House, State Dept. Briefings; Senate Committee Hearings; LA chase - Duration: 9:45:15.

-------------------------------------------

Three U.S. Service Members Killed In Powerful Afghanistan Blast | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:18.

For more infomation >> Three U.S. Service Members Killed In Powerful Afghanistan Blast | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

today currency rate/U.S.Dollar.Saudia Riyal//International Fore Rttes|new currency rates - Duration: 11:01.

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

IF YOU NEED MORE INMORATION VISIT MY CHANNEL AND SUBSCRIBE

THANKS FOR WATCHING

For more infomation >> today currency rate/U.S.Dollar.Saudia Riyal//International Fore Rttes|new currency rates - Duration: 11:01.

-------------------------------------------

United Nations Charter | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 20:22.

For more infomation >> United Nations Charter | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 20:22.

-------------------------------------------

Five Big Ways the United States Will Need to Adapt to Climate Change - Duration: 4:35.

Five Big Ways the United States Will Need to Adapt to Climate Change

WASHINGTON — The federal government's sweeping new National Climate Assessment is more than just a dire warning about current and future global warming effects across the United States. It's also the most detailed guide yet to all the ways the country will have to adapt.

Even if the nations of the world get their act together and slash fossil-fuel emissions rapidly, the United States will need to spend many billions of dollars to harden coastlines, rebuild sewer systems and overhaul farming practices to protect against floods, wildfires and heat waves that are already causing havoc nationwide. And the more that emissions rise, the more difficult and costly that task gets.

The United States isn't prepared. In the Midwest, the report notes, only four counties and cities have written climate change plans. This in a region where scientists are forecasting bigger crop failures and heavier floods that could cripple transportation networks. And at the federal level, the Trump administration is rolling back policies to take future sea-level rise into account when building new roads and railways.

Below are five major steps the scientific report says the country will need to take in the decades ahead:

The nation's food supply could be in jeopardy as global warming intensifies, the report warns. Crop yields for corn, wheat and soy tend to decline as the number of extremely hot days increases. More frequent droughts could reduce supplies of irrigation water. Dairy cows produce less milk in the sweltering heat.

Farmers will have to rethink their practices in response.

In areas at risk of drought, they could use more precise irrigation techniques to conserve water. Agricultural regions could build new weather networks that provide more detailed climate forecasts, to help farmers make better decisions about which crops to plant, and when. In places like the Great Plains, dairy farmers and ranchers may need to relocate production or invest in climate-controlled buildings to protect their cattle from heat stress.

But the report emphasizes, "these approaches have limits under severe climate change impacts."

One hope is that seed companies might develop new crop varieties that are better able to tolerate drought, heat waves and pests. However, the report cautions that "progress in this area has been modest" and calls for much greater public investment.

Much of the nation's infrastructure, including things like roads and sewers, was built with historical weather conditions in mind. But as extreme weather becomes more frequent, the report says, the past is no longer a good guide to the future.

In Hampton Roads, Va., nearly half of residents reported being unable to drive out of their neighborhoods at some point last year because of flooding at high tide as sea levels have risen. In the Northeast, sewer systems built for the storms of the past are expected to overflow more frequently as climate change brings heavier rainfall.

"It's still not standard practice for engineers to think about future climate," said Costa Samaras, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. While a few cities, like New York and Baltimore, have begun using climate forecasts in their infrastructure planning, he said, "it's not as widespread as it needs to be."

Depending on how rapidly emissions increase, global sea levels are likely to rise between 1 and 4 feet (or even more) this century, the report says, potentially putting trillions of dollars' worth of coastal homes and businesses in the United States at risk of flooding.

While large cities like New York and Boston will likely invest heavily in sea walls, tide gates and pumping stations, they won't be able to protect everyone. In places like Norfolk, Va., officials are already pondering the prospect of relocating certain vulnerable neighborhoods.

Ultimately, the report warns, millions of people nationwide may have to move away from the coasts. Yet most policymakers are reluctant to even broach the topic. Many local governments, in search of more tax revenue, still promote development along coastlines. And a bevy of federal policies, such as subsidized flood insurance and efforts to rebuild communities in place after disasters, still discourage people from moving away from at-risk areas.

Katherine Greig, a senior fellow at the Wharton Risk Center and co-author of the report's chapter on adaptation, said that "We're still a long ways" from having "a serious conversation about retreat."

Climate adaptation isn't just a matter of redesigning roads or power plants to be more resilient to extreme weather. The report also details ways that our natural environment, if managed properly, can be a cost-effective defense against climate change.

Planting more trees in cities can help reduce urban temperatures and protect people from deadly heat waves. Restoring degraded wetlands and marshes can protect cities and coasts from flooding and improve water quality. Healthy forests that are allowed to burn at a low level periodically, as they did in the distant past, are less prone to extreme wildfires. Protecting pollinators could help make our agricultural system more resilient.

One example from the report: Several Midwestern cities, including Milwaukee, have begun a large-scale effort to restore streams to their natural state, removing concrete linings, so that they can safely carry away more water during heavy storms.

As detailed as the new 1,656-page climate assessment is, the authors still warn that global warming is likely to bring unpredictable dangers, particularly as complex systems like energy, water, transportation and public health all come under severe stress at once.

As an example, Hurricane Harvey in Texas last year ended up shutting down gasoline refineries, straining hospitals, clogging roadways and spreading toxins and pathogens as floodwaters swamped the city. These sorts of "cascading failures" are difficult to study and predict in advance.

At a broad level, the report warns that officials at every level of government and in every corner of the economy will have to weave climate change into their decisions, to plan for a wide range of possible futures, and to continually re-evaluate those plans. "Adaptation entails a continuing risk management process," the report notes. "It does not have an end point."

For more news on climate and the environment, follow @NYTClimate on Twitter.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét