Thứ Năm, 29 tháng 11, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Nov 29 2018

US FINE CRITICIANS CHOOSE BEST FILM 2018

National Board of Critics USA chose the best movie

2018

On the official website of the organization reported that this title

went to the drama "Green book".

The film tells the "real history of italian-american

bouncers Tony Lipa who in the 60s he became a driver

best jazz african american pianist Don Shirley.

The best actor was recognized Viggo Mortensen, who played

in the Green Book home role.

But the best actress was Lady Gaga, starring in the film

"Star was born" Bradley Cooper, who won

winning the nomination "best producer".

Among the animated films have noted "The Incredibles

2 ".

Solemn ceremony the award ceremony will take place

January 8, 2019.

For more infomation >> FILM CRITICS UNITED STATES HAS SELECTED THE BEST FILM IN 2018 - Duration: 1:06.

-------------------------------------------

Migrant Caravan Leaders Demand U.S. Rush Asylum Process in Press Conference - Duration: 2:29.

For more infomation >> Migrant Caravan Leaders Demand U.S. Rush Asylum Process in Press Conference - Duration: 2:29.

-------------------------------------------

Obama Demands Credit for Booming U.S. Oil and Gas Production - Duration: 2:55.

For more infomation >> Obama Demands Credit for Booming U.S. Oil and Gas Production - Duration: 2:55.

-------------------------------------------

Stephen Biddle: What Resources Would the U.S. Need to "Win" in Syria and Afghanistan? - Duration: 1:21.

Well, the US military has doctrine that lays out guidelines for how many

soldiers do you need to stabilize a threatened country involved in a civil

war insurgency. And those guidelines tell you how many troops you need per

civilians in the country involved to provide them with the security they need

to defend themselves against insurgents and terrorists. If you apply that

standard rule of thumb to a place like either Afghanistan or Syria or Iraq you

end up with numbers well north of 200,000 trained, motivated security

providers which in most circumstances basically means Americans. And the whole

problem here is that these situations all matter to Americans but not that

much. I mean, nobody in the American political system at the moment

believes that it's commensurate with the scale of the U.S. stake in a place like

Afghanistan or Syria to send the hundreds of thousands of soldiers the

current U.S. military doctrine says you would need if you were actually going to

stabilize these places by force of arms without some sort of painful negotiated

settlement that gives up significant parts of the stake to an actor that we

dislike as much as, say, the Taliban.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét