Auto news on Youtube Oct 5 2018

Hello Internet - and welcome back to the most inquisitive channel on YouTube - Life's

Biggest Questions, the place where we can't help but keep our eyes open when faced with

a relentless neck-snapping machine.

What's going on guys - as always I'll be your host Jack Finch - as we boot up the

archives once again, demonstrate our authority as an O5 official - and curiously ask the

question, What If SCP-173 Was Real?

Roll the clip.

Fun fact - actually - because many people commonly think that SCP-173 was ripped off

from Doctor Who's Weeping Angels - first aired on the 9th June 2007 - but in fact,

SCP-173 was the first ever skip created on the x boards of 4chan - and predated Doctor

Who's episode by several months.

In fact - it spawned the entire SCP canon, and is the reason that we're even here,

discussing the possibilities of a terrifying fictional scenario and the consequences of

a containment breach.

Coincidence?

Well - I'm not entirely sure, but the Blink episode actually gave us quite a credible

insight into our hypothetical scenario.

So let's learn a thing or two.

Before we jump into that though - you know the drill by now guys - make sure to hit that

thumbs up button if you're a fan of this video, the SCP Foundation - or just LBQ in

general - then be a dear and hit that thumbs up button - as well as that subscribe bell,

so you can stay up to date with our latest and greatest questioning uploads.

On with the show.

So - what exactly is SCP-173, you may ask.

Is it a hulking space beast summoned through a keyhole?

Is it an indestructible hateful lizard that just can't die?

Well, no.

It's a statue - really - but sometimes, the fear of the uncanny is far more terrifying

than you think.

SCP-173 is an Euclid class object of unknown origin - and is interestingly classified,

as usually - a skip of such destructive hostility would be Keter class - but the difference

here is the ease of its containment.

It's a relatively easy to deal with Euclid class object and shut away within its containment

procedures.

Or is it?

173 is a statue like object constructed from concrete and rebar, with traces of Krylon

brand spray paint.

In other words - it wouldn't look out of place in a graffiti exhibition.

SCP-173 is animate and extremely hostile, despite appearances that may indicate otherwise.

The object cannot move while within a direct light of sight - and thusly, line of sight

must not be broken at any time with the object.

This is incredibly The foundation's containment procedure is actually pretty straightforward

- and is essentially, seal it in a box and hope for the best.

The object is reported to attack by snapping the neck at the base of the skull, or - in

more rare circumstances - by means of strangulation.

In the event of an attack - personnel are to observe Class 4 Hazardous Object Containment

procedures.

SCP-173 regularly secretes a strange, reddish brown substance in the area around it - which

is commonly believed to be a combination of feces and blood.

The origin of these materials are unknown - but, by orders of the foundation - the enclosure

must be cleaned on a bi-weekly basis to keep the reddish brown substance from building

up.

It is a commonly held belief in the foundation that this substance are the beginnings of

a second spawn of SCP-173 - in an intentional attempt to replicate itself.

Personnel who are assigned to the container on a cleaning duty are instructed to alert

one another before blinking, in an effort to constantly maintain a field of vision and

thus negate the skips line of attack.

But - well, actually - we're lying to you, dear listeners.

Because special containment procedures for SCP-173 aren't as straightforward as we

initially described.

In fact - as recent revised entries have shown - an XK end of the world scenario has already

been brought about via the unknown actions of SCP-173.

Remember that strange, reddish brown substance that we spoke about?

Well - in one initial instance, SCP-173 appeared to multiply itself - producing two identical

copies, resulting in the deaths of two D-Class personnel.

After being moved to separate cells, a second multiplication event occurred - creating 4

copies of itself, labelled SCP-173 1 through 4, and the object being reclassified as Keter.

Of course - this resulted in a further security breach - as an event like this was unprecedented

in the Foundation's history - creating at least 61 copies of itself and eventually leading

to over half a million civilian deaths across North America.

This resulted in a mass media panic - with hundreds of thousands of sightings alongside

unprecedented pieces of evidence of the foundations existence.

Major television news outlets had obtained clear video evidence of SCP-173 killing civilians,

which led to the media providing instructions for avoiding an instant death.

It is commonly theorised that SCP-173 utilised a hive-mind - an intelligence that exponentially

scales with the number of nearby copies.

After the first copy had been created, the skip was twice as smart - and on and on they

went.

It is believed that their ultimate target was the O5 Council, in a presumed takeover

plot for domination of the Earth.

Well - of course - I think I've already said too much, but remember - SCP-173 is a

problem that has not been fully dealt with.

The Beacons are Lit.

Unfortunately folks, that's all we've got time for in today's SCP-based video

- that's for sticking around for this Foundation approved message.

If you've been a fan of this video, the SCP Foundation - or just LBQ in general - then

go ahead and give us a thumbs up.

To carry on with your SCP questioning binge - make sure to hit that playlist floating

shortly above.

As per usual, I've been your host Jack Finch - you've been watching Life's Biggest

Questions - and until next time, you take it easy.

For more infomation >> What If SCP 173 Was Real? - Duration: 5:35.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Grudge Was Real? - Duration: 5:01.

The grudge is the movie about a curse that is born when someone dies of extreme anger

or sorrow.

The curse takes the form of a ghost, that's capable of killing whoever it comes into contact

with.

The curse is passed on from person to person and it goes on forever.

It's a terrifying concept to think about.

It's a good thing that a curse isn't born every time someone dies in extreme anger or

sorrow.

But what if the grudge wasn't just a film, what if the grudge was real.

Lets imagine what it would be like, at least for the next few minutes.

Hello and welcome back to life's biggest questions.

I'm charlotte dobre.

If this is your first time here, smash the thumbs up, subscribe and notification bell

and ask us a question in the comments below.

And if you want to connect with the creative team behind life's biggest questions, the

links to our social media accounts are posted in the description box down below.

The first time I tried to watch the grudge, I actually couldn't get through it, I left

the theatre and watched team America instead.

That's how scared I was.

So you can understand how difficult it is for me to imagine what would happen if the

grudge was real.

But I'm going to do it for you, dear subscribers of life's biggest questions.

The Grudge is an American supernatural horror film released in 2004 that was actually a

remake of a Japanese film called Ju-On: the grude.

And we all know just how much the Japanese love their supernatural horror.

Basically, the premise of the grudge is this.

Every time someone dies while being extremely angry or sad, a curse is born.

The curse appears as an entity where the person died.

The entity is known as an onryo ghost, which is a Japanese term for a vengeful spirit that

can cause harm to the living to try to redress the wrongs it experienced while it was alive.

According to Japanese urban legend, An onryo driven by vengeance has the power to cause

their enemy's death, and also cause natural disasters.

The people who encounter the curse die, and then the curse is subsequently reborn and

passed from victim to victim.

Hense the name of the film, the grudge.

First things first, If the grudge was real, it would mean that every time anyone was murdered,

a curse would be born.

Unless the person who was murdered died without being angry or sad, but I would imagine that

being murdered is a pretty traumatizing experience.

Being murdered by a lover would definitely cause anger, or even extreme sadness, even

if the victim only felt those emotions for a short period of time before they died.

But if the grudge was real, it would give victims of murder a chance at revenge..

The story of the grudge dictates that the curse will appear as an entity wherever that

person died.

As we know, murderers often return to the scene of the crime that they committed.

It would mean that all victims of murders would have a chance to kill their murderers.

If the grudge was real, it could mean that people would be far less likely to commit

murders.

Knowing that it's possible that the person who you killed could inevitably come back

as a vengeful spirit, that could then kill you would make a lot of people less likely

to commit murder.

I mean its not rocket science, you commit first-degree murder because you want to get

rid of someone.

The idea of your victim coming back for revenge is just not on the table.

I mean, you could technically avoid the curse as long as you stayed away from the place

where you committed the murder, but what if that place was your house?

If you committed murder in your house, you would inevitably have to move.

But this creates a problem that would end up with you being caught.

Whoever moved into your house after you would then encounter the curse, and likely die.

If the police knew about the death curse, it would be pretty difficult to get away with

murder.

Every person that lived in your house after you would die from the curse, and it all started

with the murder that was first committed.

All the police would have to do is figure out who the curse started with, and boom,

they know who the murderer is.

Then also address the curse being born out of the people who die of extreme sorrow.

Remember, its not just someone that dies in anger, The curse can also be born if you have

died of extreme sorrow.

An example of people who die of extreme sorrow could be prisoners of war.

Imagine what would have happened if the grudge was real in nazi Germany.

The combined sorrow from all of the prisoners at nazi death camps would have essentially

wiped out the Nazis.

Another example of someone who dies of extreme sorrow is someone that commits suicide, and

sadly, a lot of people commit suicide.

About 1.4 percent of all deaths are suicides.

Essentially someone that's suicidal that knew about the curse could use their suicide

to get back at people who have wronged them.

A suicidal person could send out messages to the people who have wronged them asking

them to visit, then kill themselves so that the curse is born, and then when they are

visited by someone, for example an ex lover, the curse would kill that person.

And according to scientists, you really can die of a broken heart.

According to a study At Harvard medical school, if someone significant in your life dies,

your risk of heart attack increases to 21 times higher within the first day, and within

the first week, 6 times higher.

It's the combination of stress, a lack of sleep and forgetting to take medication that

puts people who are mourning at risk.

Essentially if the grudge was real, we would all be pretty much screwed.

I know we say that a lot on this channel, but its true.

Think about it.

Every time someone dies of extreme anger or sorrow, a curse is born, and every time someone

came into contact with the curse, they would die, likely of extreme anger or sorrow, and

it would go on forever and ever until the end of time until there would be no one left.

Well there you have it, these are just a few examples of what I think would happen if the

grudge was real.

Let me know what you think would happen in the comments below.

For now, I'm charlotte dobre and you've been watching life's biggest questions.

If you wanna go on an LBQ binge, check out the playlist that's clickable on the screen

right now.

And don't forget to turn on those notifications, and we will see you in a future episode of

life's biggest questions.

For more infomation >> What If The Grudge Was Real? - Duration: 5:01.

-------------------------------------------

What is Paid Today? - Paid Today Presents: Paid Today Shorts Ep1 - Duration: 0:16.

What Is Paid Today?

The smartest way to manage your business

Features

invoicing Payments

messaging project management

Team management Open Market Place

All From One App Sign Up Today! www.paidtoday.com

For more infomation >> What is Paid Today? - Paid Today Presents: Paid Today Shorts Ep1 - Duration: 0:16.

-------------------------------------------

What Brett Kavanaugh Is Getting Away With - Duration: 4:51.

Even with an FBI investigation, Republicans have no intention of getting to the bottom

of the assault allegations against him.

Give this to Jeff Flake: When it comes to infuriating people, he's truly bipartisan.

His denunciations of President Donald Trump have been too pointed for many on the right,

and too feeble for those on the left.

His eleventh-hour intervention in Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination—in which he asked

for an FBI investigationinto sexual assault allegations that would delay a confirmation

vote for a week—drove just about everybody crazy, with the possible exception of Flake

and his fellow undecideds, Republicans Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski and Democrat Joe

Manchin.

On the right, the delay was treated as a shameful capitulation to Democratic demands that were

never brought in good faith.

In an editorial, National Reviewportrayed Flake as a dope whose actions damaged the

long-held dream of a conservative Supreme Court majority.

On the left, there were suspicions that Flake had laid a trap, given the limits on the investigation:

only one week in duration, with the White House in control of who the FBI could interview.

The probe is unlikely to reveal any new information, but it would give cover to Republican senators

like Flake who are inclined to vote for Kavanaugh but have bowed to public pressure following

the riveting testimony of his accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

Those suspicions were bolstered when it was reported that the White House had told the

FBI that it could interview only four people and that sensitive topics, including Kavanaugh's

drinking, should be excluded.

After fierce criticism, the White House relented.

On Monday afternoon, The New York Times reported that the FBI had been given direction to interview

anybody it felt was important to the inquiry.

But even with this added authority, the FBI investigation has all the makings of a fig

leaf for Republicans to get on with Kavanaugh's nomination, while leaving the crucial question

of his guilt or innocence determinedly unresolved.

This was evident from the beginning.

Democrats had demanded the investigation not only to get closer to the bottom of the matter,

but also to highlight Kavanaugh's very conspicuous attempts to sweep it all under the rug.

If he is innocent, the thinking went, why is he so reluctant to launch an investigation

that could potentially clear his name?

But the White House only conceded to the bare minimum.

The FBI initially decided that it would only interview Mark Judge, who was allegedly in

the room where Kavanaugh allegedly assaulted Ford; P.J. Smyth, who was allegedly at the

party where the assault occurred; Ford's high school friend Leland Keyser, who was

also allegedly at the party; and Deborah Ramirez, who accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct

while both were at Yale.

There would be nothing close to a comprehensive survey of Kavanaugh's behavior when he was

a young man.

Even in its expanded form, it's unlikely that the FBI's report will shed much new

light on what happened.

We already know, for instance, that Judge has written extensivelyabout his high school

exploits with Kavanaugh and his own issues with alcohol.

We know that Keyser does not recall attending that particular party, though she does believe

Ford's story.

Republicans have boiled the whole matter down to a "he said-she said" dispute, and are

apparently content to leave it that way.

An FBI report—even one that includes statements from Judge—will likely be a more official

version of We Report The Daily's Breaking News, America

Breaking News, Cnn Breaking News, News, Breaking, President

Donald Trump Beaking News, Breaking News Headlines, White House News And The Most Interesting

News.