Thứ Bảy, 6 tháng 10, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Oct 6 2018

indoor electric grills provide the same grilling features in compact and

convenient units that you can use inside your home today we looking at the best

five indoor grills that have an array of features and capabilities to consider

the fifth pick on our list today kicking things off is the Breville BGR 820 XL

smart grill the Breville Smart grills element IQ technology bridges the gap

between indoor and outdoor at an unrivaled new level heat sensors

embedded in the grill plates compensate for the temperature drop when cold food

is placed onto the preheated surface the 1800 watt embedded heating design

ensures maximum heat into the plates for faster cooking and reduced preheating

time this creates a barbecue quality sear and

sizzle at number four we have the hamilton beach indoor flavor searing

grill hamilton beach searing grills have discovered how moist and tender meat can

be when it's grilled the right way hamilton beach searing grills quickly

ramp up to a high heat that is ideal for searing in juices and flavor and then

cooled down to the proper grilling temperature to finish cooking you end up

with tender results in every bite plus the skill you need to grill perfectly

every time

the third pic on our list is the George Foreman indoor/outdoor grill in black

the George Foreman indoor/outdoor electric grill is perfect for

entertaining use the 240 square inches nonstick cooking surface to make a

delicious family dinner or move it outdoors for a classic backyard barbecue

the sloped grilling surface variable temperature controls and easy cleanup

make it that much simpler to create burgers chicken appetizers desserts and

so much more at number 2 we have the DeLonghi BG 24 perfecto indoor grill

enjoy indoor grilling all year long with the DeLonghi indoor grill you will

always get consistent grilled foods with the fully embedded grill plate it

distributes heat evenly to avoid any overly hot or cold spots impress your

family and guests by using the tempered glass lid it will keep your food's

tasting perfect and juicy and it keeps already grilled food warm

and the top product on the list today at number one is the t-fal GC 7-0 2d opti

grilles stainless steel indoor electric grill this indoor grill offers

versatility and convenience for any grilled meals choose from six preset

programs burger poultry sandwich sausage red meat and fish

the grills precision grilling technique with sensors measures the thickness of

food for auto cooking based on the program selected when the flashing light

turns solid purple the grill has been properly preheated place food on the

grill lower the lid and it takes care of the rest we hope you enjoyed this video

please don't forget to share your valuable comments if you liked our video

do give us a thumbs up and hit the subscribe button to watch other great

videos have a great day

For more infomation >> what is the best indoor grill to get? Indoor grill Reviews 2018 - Duration: 3:40.

-------------------------------------------

After Amy & Emily Scream I WAS ARRESTED, Witness Reveals What Really Happened - Duration: 5:16.

For more infomation >> After Amy & Emily Scream I WAS ARRESTED, Witness Reveals What Really Happened - Duration: 5:16.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Bible Was Never Written? - Duration: 7:57.

The bible, in some form or another, dates back over two thousand years.

The existence of this book has had a profound effect on humanity and forms the basis of

Christianity as a religion – a religion shared by nearly one third of the planet.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions – the channel that looks to answer

a plethora of questions…sometimes serious, sometimes not.

We don't believe that curiosity killed the cat, we believe it made it wiser.

I am your host Rebecca Felgate and today we are asking What if the Bible never existed.

Okay, so this is a controversial one because people are usually a little emotional when

it comes to what they believe in.

In this video I am not discussing whether or not god is real – we have already made

a video like that on this channel which you should check out.

Can we have a positive comments section where you guys let me know if you are religious

and if so, what religion you support?

So, I don't want to shock you, but THE BIBLE doesn't exist.

When we talk about the bible, generally speaking we are talking about King James Edition from

1601, but even now there are 6,000 different books in print publication that claim to be

the bible.

Old testaments, new testaments, additional books for Catholics, varying translations.

The bible, as the collection of books have become known, is made up of scripture that

dates back to many different time periods.

The Old Testament is heavily based on the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were written around

400 BCE.

A genuine concern regarding the bible is that there is no discussed singular author who

can be held accountable for the text, which means we can't measure their credibility.

Religious texts are as confusing, if not more so, that government legislation – which

some critics may argue are purposefully confusing and inaccessible in order to discourage people

from delving too deeply.

I am just wondering – who here is religious and has independently read their own religious

book cover to cover?

Would organized religion be less of a hinderance for universal social progression if there

wasn't a text people literally have taken as gospel?

Many bible critics say that the text is outdated and was written in a time that is too far

removed from our own.

The early parts of the bible was written at a time when there where just 170 million people

on earth – we are now honing in on 8 billion.

Not only were the originally words of the bible in a language nobody speaks and barely

understands, but things have really changed!

We no longer live basic existences.

The problem is with an old book is that it documents a window into a life we don't

lead anymore.

Without the bible, perhaps social evolution would have been smoother and come a lot quicker.

Society is a culmination of millennia of working things out for ourselves, but the bible immortalizes

behaviour we have grown out of for good reason – for example, slavery.

Without the bible, perhaps people would stop finding excuses to behave in ways we no longer

deem acceptable.

Perhaps if there was no text dictating what is right and wrong – people would feel a

deeper connection to what god means to them and their connection to religion, rather than

being TOLD what god means and TOLD how to feel about certain issues.

In some ways, perhaps without a bible we would feel a deeper sense or responsibility for

the actions.

If you need a book to teach you what's up….

Then something has gone wrong… right?

Perhaps if the bible hadn't been written and our experience of god was purely faith

based, we wouldn't have felt the need to fight so many ideological wars throughout

the course of history.

Most God based religions have very similar core values - if from the beginning we had

accepted that the way we practice those values was a little different from each other and

had no literary basis for comparison then perhaps we wouldn't have been so adamant

that other people were right or wrong.

The European religion wars, for example, spanned the 16th and 17th centuries and killed 10

million people – a sizable chunk of the population.

Would these wars have taken place without the bible?

That is up for debate.

If there was no bible, would this mean that there is no Christianity?

I don't think so.

The bible is important, but surely a book doesn't matter as much as the faith itself?

Perhaps Christianity at its core would probably exist, it just might not have its offshoots

and labels.

If the bible didn't exist, would churches?

If there were no Christian churches, the architecture of Europe and The Americas would be pretty

different.

Most early settlements were built around churches.

But…honestly, if the bible didn't exist, I would say the church would still definitely

exist – people innately feel the need to have their beliefs discussed and validated

in groups and churches are as much a social phenomenon as they are a religious one.

If there was no bible then religion may be less structured but that doesn't mean there

wouldn't be people claiming to speak the word of god.

We may have less books in circulation but we may have more profits, which possibly would

open a whole can of worms when it comes to who or what is legitimate.

Would some so called profits try and convince people that their way of understanding religion

is the right way – and in which case, instead would we open ourselves up to a number of

different cults….

And if so….we're back at the warring again!

Oof.

Would power and class structures have evolved differently without a religious text?

Up until the 20th century, swathes of people were illiterate so couldn't even read the

bible that existed anyway, but that didn't stop them believing in god – however it

did make them more vulnerable to control by those who did have the ability to read and

interpret.

To be honest, it is hard to fathom a world without a bible – as nice as it sounds that

we could all have a personal understanding and relationship with spirituality, humans

LOVE documentation.

From early cave man drawings and Egyptian hieroglyphics, it is clear that humans as

a species feel a strong connection with their beliefs and want to reflect that somehow.

Like I said, we also seek huge affirmation and validation when we can share the way we

believe with other humans…for individuals, we sure love conformity….we don't like

feeling different.

If the bible hadn't been written – how long would it have been until another text

was held as definitive.

Having something in common is important to people – the bible allowed for people from

different cultures and backgrounds to communicate, agree and therefore bond over something.

The teachings in the bible were hugely influential in the way in which European and American

societies developed.

A lot of laws and morals we know and abide by today can be traced back to the bible….

Or can they?

They must have already existed beyond the point in which they were written, if not they

wouldn't have been written, right?

But I suppose the bible gave clout to them and made them enforceable.

To be honest, for better or for worse, the bible was written and is so deeply ingrained

in how Western society has developed and how our history has unfolded that is impossible

to answer this question in the space of five minutes… but it does spark some interesting

thoughts and points of discussion.

It also is important to take a few moments to apply critical thought to what see and

take for granted.

What do you think the world would be like if the bible was never written?

Let me know in the comments section down below.

Again – keep it open minded and keep it kind.

If you like these types of video – let us know

For more infomation >> What If The Bible Was Never Written? - Duration: 7:57.

-------------------------------------------

Yes, the FBI's Kavanaugh investigation was a sham — but here is what Democrats should do about it - Duration: 3:50.

The reopened FBI background check on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was always going to be something of a sham

Consider how the request by Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona was originally worded in the Judiciary Committee meeting last Friday:   Until that moment, it had been assumed that the Republicans were going to "plow through," as promised by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

When Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said they were with Flake, McConnell and the White House knew they had to go along

They didn't have the votes.  Nonetheless,  the fix was always in. Flake's request for a short investigation "limited in scope to the current allegations that are there" was wide open to interpretation

Which "current allegations" were they talking about? At that point, two other women had come forward following Christine Blasey Ford's initial accusation, and there was ample reason to investigate whether Kavanaugh had committed perjury multiple times during the hearings

 Everyone was aware by this time that the Senate had no authority to order the FBI to reopen the background check

It was up to the White House to issue that directive. What this meant in practice was that the White House would likely burn up time on the clock as much as possible and ensure that the "scope" would be very limited indeed

And that is exactly what happened.  This was cleverly disguised in a fog of shifting responsibility and presidential comments that left everyone scratching their heads about what was really going on

When asked whether he had limited the FBI investigation, President Trump said on Saturday, "They're going to do whatever they have to do, whatever it is they do

They'll be doing things that we have never even thought of. And hopefully at the conclusion everything will be fine

" Later on Twitter he said, "I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion

"  That sounded as if the White House had decided to allow the FBI to do its job as it normally would

Experts all said this would be something the bureau could easily accomplish. After all, the FBI has thousands of employees and tremendous capacity

But reporters were already hearing that the White House would actually only allow the FBI to interview four people

Then the stories changed and nobody really knew what was happening.  The White House insisted it would defer to the Senate, while senators insisted it was out of their hands and the White House was in charge

On Wednesday the investigation was concluded and it became clear the FBI had only been permitted to interview six people, which did not include either Kavanaugh or Ford

Meanwhile, dozens of other people were coming forward with corroborating evidence, offering to make statements under oath

They received no response from the FBI.  All of this brings up an interesting conundrum

Theoretically, the FBI had a choice to make here. Trump said publicly, more than once, that he wanted agents to have free rein, follow all leads and do a thorough investigation

Obviously, the bureau was getting other private instructions from the White House

They could have chosen to take the president's public comments as their marching orders rather than the other ones

For more infomation >> Yes, the FBI's Kavanaugh investigation was a sham — but here is what Democrats should do about it - Duration: 3:50.

-------------------------------------------

[Clarification time] What is Neurodiversity? - Duration: 3:18.

[music]

There are many emerging terms commonplace in the communities of

differently minded people, which are not as well known outside of these circles.

We wanted to clear up what some of these terms mean, while hopefully entertaining

you with some beautiful scenery we experienced traveling around New South Wales.

Neurodiversity is a term used to describe a different way of processing

information in the brain. This can include differences in processing

sensory information from the environment, interpreting social interaction, focus,

and often differences in processing and coping with overloading stimuli.

Neurotypical is the opposite term to neurodiverse, and describes the most

common way in a population of processing particular information. It's what most

people consider quote-unquote "normal". Some people also use the term allistic,

but this is more specifically an opposite to autism rather than neurodiverse.

The terms neurodiverse and neurotypical are intended to destigmatize

different ways of acting and perceiving the world, and recognize the validity of

a person's unique world experience. They eliminate the need to call someone

"abnormal" or "weird" in a derogatory sense. Neurodiversity is most commonly

used in reference to autism due to the vast differences in information

processing between autistic and non-autistic brains, but they could be

used to describe any significant difference in information processing of

the brain and resultant abilities. Some other community groups who are adopting

this term include those with ADHD and Down's Syndrome.

Diffability is a term often used to replace the word disability, to highlight

the positive aspects of many disorders. The term is intended to highlight the

different talents, abilities and contributions that can come from those

who experience the world in a different way.

Similar to neurodiversity, diffability is most commonly used in reference to autism,

to highlight the different contributions that can arise from processing input in

a different way than the so-called "normal", but can be used for people

from other neurodiverse groups as well.

While a few people may demonstrate the extraordinary talent like those

portrayed in media, the majority of neurodiverse people have much more

subtle diffabilities. The range of diffabilities is as vast as the range of

abilities you can imagine. For instance, they may see colors differently, and

portray this with an unusual painting style, or they may have a different

approach to problem solving and be able to come up with unique solutions

Possibly. Only you can really answer that question. Do some research, watch some

videos, and see if anything resonates with you. If you are neurodiverse,

welcome to the community. And if you're not, you're welcome as well; all

viewpoints are valuable, and we want to be inclusive of all outlooks on life.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét