Thứ Sáu, 5 tháng 10, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Oct 5 2018

There's a part I can't tell About the dark I know well

You say, "Time for bed now, child" Mom just smiles that smile

Just like she never saw me Just like she never saw me

So I leave wantin' just to hide Knowin' deep inside

You are comin' to me You are comin' to me

You say all you want is just to kiss goodnight Then you hold me and you whisper,

"Child the Lord won't mind It's just you and me

Child you're a beauty"

"God, it's good, the lovin', ain't it good tonight

You ain't seen nothin' yet, gonna treat you right

It's just you and me Child you're a beauty"

I don't scream though I know it's wrong I just play along

I lie there and breathe Lie there and breathe

I wanna be strong I want the world to find out

That you're dreamin' on me Me and my beauty

Me and my beauty

You say all you want is just to kiss goodnight

Then you hold me and you whisper, "Child the Lord won't mind

It's just you and me Child you're a beauty"

"God, it's good to lovin', ain't it good tonight You ain't seen nothin' yet, gonna treat you

right It's just you and me

Child you're a beauty" There's a part I can't tell

'Bout the dark I know well There's a part I can't tell

About the dark I know well There's a part I can't tell

'Bout the dark I know well There's a part I can't tell

About the dark I know well

For more infomation >> the dark i know well - asl comparison over time - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

Choose Dark Chocolate For Health Benefits? - Duration: 3:34.

Some people claim that chocolate is good especially dark chocolate, but there's a

big difference between different forms of chocolate. So a lot of people will eat

this and this has 18 grams of sugar per 28 grams so it's like 2/3 of pure sugar.

The more sugar it has the more addictive it is. So they tell you that one

serving is 28 grams while it gets addicted then you're not going to stop

at one serving so you're going to keep eating and eating and eating. The peanut

ones are a little bit better because the peanuts is fills out with some fat and

protein but even so it has 15 grams of sugar for 28 gram serving and again

you're gonna keep eating because the sugar makes it very addictive. So let's

look at some better alternatives so then some people say that they eat dark

chocolate so now it has less sugar well not necessarily it has a little bit less

sugar but like this one it tastes really nice it's one of my favorites but I just

don't eat it it has too much sugar it has 47% cocoa powder cocoa solids in it

and that means that the other half is all sugar so it has 19 grams of sugar

for a 40 gram serving so again that would be too much sugar and if you

wondering why sugar is bad then go watch the video that we posted on the reasons

sugar kill you so you want to keep it to a minimum so I want to step it up

once you have to about 70 plus this is 78% now you have 7 grams of sugar in a

40 gram serving so if it has 78% cocoa then it can't have more than 22% sugar

if you get the math so you want to get up to at least 75 78% somewhere around

there and what you're going to find is because it's not so sweet it's not so

addictive and it's more satisfying a little bit goes a long way so for

squares is what they call a serving but you might be satisfied even after eating

2 squares would be half a serving and now you'd have 3 and 1/2 grams of sugar

once your work your way up you're also going to find that your taste buds

change and you don't crave the sweet so much so now you might be up to like an

85 percent this is where if I have chocolate this is pretty much what I eat

and this has 5 grams of sugar for 40 grams servings but I would only eat one

or maybe two squares so in two squares you get two and a half grams of sugar so

now you can give yourself the treat once in a while and not feel so bad about it

For more infomation >> Choose Dark Chocolate For Health Benefits? - Duration: 3:34.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 Scary Facebook Dark Secrets - Part 2 - Duration: 10:06.

Welcome back everyone, today Im gonna be talking about Facebook - you may have heard of it.

I think I made that joke in the last video - Im becoming too predictable.

In that last video though, I revealed the dark underbelly of the most used social media

site on the planet - Facebook.

Many of you were shocked but also intrigued to learn more - so here we are.

My name is Danny Burke and this is the Top 10 Scary Facebook Dark Secrets - Part 2.

Starting off at number 10 now we have the Messenger Scans.[a] In April 2018, Bloomberg

reported that Facebook scans every link and image that people send each other on Facebook

Messenger.

Facebook said they do this so that they can flag content that goes against their terms

and conditions.

In a statement, they gave an example of their scanning as a tool to detect and stop child

exploitation imagery as their system will scan it and flag it to their attention.

They say the same works for links that people send you being scanned for malware or viruses.

This may sound good on paper but in practice, many people are unhappy with the idea of Facebook

scanning their pictures or personal links, wether or not its a machine doing it.

At the end of the day, I think this one comes down, like so many things, to how much you

value safety and fighting crime compared to your own privacy … Id be interested to hear

where the line is for you in the comments …

Next up at number 9 we have Deleted Videos.

In the last video we talked about Cambridge Analytica - the company that gathered information

about millions of Facebook users to sell it on for political purposes.

One of Facebooks responses to the scandal was to download their data archive and see

for themselves what Facebook ahs been storing about them.

To peoples horror, they found that Facebook had stored videos that they had deleted.

There they were, still present in Facebook archives and available for anyone to retrieve

who knew how … Facebook apologised for the unintentional bug.

However, the damage was done and public opinion of Facebook plumited, thanks to their loose

definition of the term -deleted-

Moving on to number 8 we have Marks Messages.

As many of you are aware, Facebook users cant delete messages from someone elses inbox once

they send them a message - they can delete their own all they want - but the other person

can still see it.

Well, apparently that doesnt apply TechCrunch report.

In early 2018, they claimed that Facebook reviews old messages sent between sources

and Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook.

They found that Marks messages had been removed somehow.

When the report was released, Facebook said it was a corporate security measure.

They claimed that after Sony Pictures had their emails hacked in 2014, they made a number

of changes to protect their executives communications.

This included, in their words, -limiting the retention period for Marks messages in Messenger.

We did so in full compliance with our legal obligations to preserve messages- … whether

or not you think its fair that this privilege isnt extend to other Facebook users, one question

still remains: why didnt Facebook publicly disclose this?

Moving on to number 7 now we have The Facebook Killer.

Nobody would say this one is Facebooks fault, but its still something I think they would

like to downplay.

On April 16th 2007, 74 year old Robert Godwin Senior was shot and killed while walking on

a sidewalk in Cleveland, USA.

The suspect was 37 year old Steve Stephens - he posted a video of the shooting on his

Facebook account.

This led many media outlets to dub him the -Facebook killer- … while this was not Facebooks

fault, however, they did get some criticism.

Some felt that the video should not have been allowed up on Stephens Facebook page for 2

hours being taken down.

A few weeks later, Facebook announced that it was adding additional personnel to team

to proactively screen Facebook live content for violent and other inappropriate content.

Moving on to number 6 we have Russia.

Most people are aware of the ongoing investigation into Russian meddling into the 2016 US Election.

There has been mounting evidence of a Russian influence campaign on Facebook that targeted

America voters to spread misinformation.

Many people claim that Facebook didnt do enough to stop this, despite it happening before

their very eyes.

In response to this, Facebook announced plans to begin requiring disclosures and disclaimers

on all political ads and including issue based ads.

Some say its a step in the right direction, others say its too little too late …

Coming in at number 5 we have Anti Semitism.[b] In September 2017, Pro Republica published

an article in which they claimed that Facebook allowed them to post anti semitic advertisements

with no restrictions.

They were shocked by the test results.

For 30 dollars, they promoted 3 posts to over 2000 people interesting in topics that involved

extremely anti semitic phrases.

In just 15 minutes, the ads were approved.

After they contacted Facebook, the company removed the anti Semetic categories which

were created by an algorithm rather than people.

Despite the fact that the categories and posts were machine made and monitored - that didnt

get them off the hook.

Facebook admitted fault and said it would explore ways to fix the problem, including

limiting the number of categories available or scrutinizing them before they are displayed

to buyers … Moving on to number 4 now we have The Instagram

Clash.[c] In case you didnt already know, Facebook owns Instagram.

They bought the company in 2012 for $1 billion dollars.

In this years since then, many people thought the 2 companies had a harmonious relationship.

However, behind the scenes, it was a different story.

Rumours of the rift between them were confirmed in September 2018 when Instagram co founders

Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger announced they would be leaving the company.

This was amid reports that their departure might be due to an increase in meddling by

Mark Zuckerberg.

Thats right - they felt that Mr Zuckerberg was getting far too involved with their company

to the point where they felt the only option was to leave.

Officially, they said they were leaving to -explore their curiosity and creativity again-

… experts think that they were trying to run Instagram more independently than Facebook

wanted them to.

The companies had worked together well for the past 6 years but its thought that something

happened behind the scenes in the last few months that caused the rift between them …

Next up at number 3 we have Hate Speech.[d] In April 2018, Vox published an interview

with Mark Zuckerberg which got him in hot water with many people.He said hee helped

to silence anti Rohingya propaganda through the Facebook Messenger scans we talked about

before.

The crisis involved 650,000 Rohingya refugees being forced to flee to Bangladesh following

persecution.

Organisations in Myanmar were furious about Zuckerbegs claim.

Six groups signed a letter to Zuckerberg that stated -Though these dangerous messages were

deliberately pushed to large numbers of people – many people who received them say they

did not personally know the sender – your team did not seem to have picked up on the

pattern.

For all of your data, it would seem that it was our personal connection with senior members

of your team which led to the issue being dealt with.- … Mark Zuckerberg might have

felt Facebook did enough to stop hate speech, but many who were on the ground there did

not …

Moving on to number 2 we have Plagiarism.

In 2009, Facebook settled a lawsuit from a man who claimed he came up with Facebook.

Let me explain.

The lawsuit came from Aaron Greenspan.

He attended Harvard university at the same time as Mark Zuckerberg.

He designed a programme called houseSYSTEM for students and faculty members.

One section involved -a course scheduler, student marketplace, email service, automatic

birthday reminder, message boards, photo album, digital flyer advertising, event calendar,

map integration, job placement and local business reviews- … its name was -The Universal Face

Book- or -Face Book- for short.

The lawsuit was finally settled with Mark Zuckerberg acknowledging Aaron Greenspan for

his contribution - any money that changed hands was not disclosed … what do you think

guys?

Is this just inspiration or a total ripoff?

And finally at number 1 we have Experimentation.[e] This is a really shady one that not many people

know about.

Back in 2012, for about a week, Facebook ran an experiment.

Without users knowledge or permission, many people were shown happier or more negative

statuses than usual, with the opposing ones being censored.

At the end of the week, Facebook analysts examined if this affected peoples moods by

seeing if they posted happier or more negative things themselves.

Naturally, there was a bit of an uproar when this happened.

Many people said this was extremely unethical and that just because an experiment is done

online - it doesnt mean you can hide it from the people taking part.

Facebook didnt really seem to mind though, at least not at the time.

People speculate that they were trying to find out how to make you happy or sad so that

they could advertise certain products to you when they had you in the right mood.

How creepy is that.

The whole thing has been quite creepy - Im pretty close to just deleting Facebook altogether

but Im sure they will never delete me.

What are your thoughts on Facebook in general?

Thanks for watching as always guys, my name is Danny Burke and Ill see you all in the

next video!

For more infomation >> Top 10 Scary Facebook Dark Secrets - Part 2 - Duration: 10:06.

-------------------------------------------

Dark Secret Sen. Dianne Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 15:38.

Dark Secret Sen. Dianne Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed

so let's start with first of all the this Daxing suspect found late last

night in the congressional office of a member for whom he didn't work also

affiliated with Feinstein affiliated with Feinstein and in daxing history oh

yeah so he basically broke into the office he stole files he's apparently

very familiar with computer technology that's what he did is sending out

information sending out information so he basically stole information senators

addresses telephone numbers sent it out over the Internet of course he was

discovered he was an intern for Sheila jackson-lee

he is in huge trouble Sean he is facing a criminal felony and prison time for

this I know that Joe and I was outraged it's outrageous and it's showing you how

far the left has gone the giving out home address is now senators how

dangerous is this people can show up at their homes we don't know what dangerous

people are out there and I think the American people are starting to see

right now how terrible and how dangerous this has

become basically to the fundamentals of our Constitution and to our own life and

safety and Liberty job they got worse they're worse now than ever they're loco

but that's okay just being a democratic intern allegedly posting the personal

information of at least three Republican senators online happened during last

week's Cavanaugh hearing Fox News learned police that are now

investigating leads to more incidents one of them targeting Senator Rand Paul

jason Chaffetz former US congressman Fox News contributor how you doing good

morning to you house it into morning this 27 year old Jackson Costco how does

that happen it doesn't make sense because an unpaid intern working for

three different senators doesn't smell right on the surface but what's

fascinating about this case is there are seven different charges everything from

identity theft second-degree burglary witness tampering

where does witness tampering come into this this is more than just stealing you

know Senator Mike Lee's personal information and posting it up to

Wikipedia there's something more here well

don't get it did the intern get the information or did someone give it to

him there's your question well again I'm looking at the charges

just like everybody else but it sounds a little bit more sophisticated in the

fact that how quickly they chart arrested this person in charged this

person and again with seven different charges out there at burglary those

types of things it really does make it sound like it's a bit more sophisticated

and widespread because now you see Senator Rand Paul is also having issues

don't know if it's tied to this particular case but that would make at

least for Senator okay well I have no say I'm the lead Democrat but the

Republicans control so this is all up to the Republican side okay and I think

it's really too bad that no one called her or called her lawyer my

understanding is she got emails and this is a woman and I really believe who's

been profoundly impacted by this no I can't say everything's truthful I don't

know but I do know that you had to contact her lawyers was it communicated

to you by your counsel or someone else that the committee had asked to

interview you and that they offered to come out to California to do so I say do

you mind if I say something to you directly you know um I just appreciate

that you did offer that I wasn't clear on what the offer was if you were gonna

come out to see me I would have happily hosted you and had to had been happy to

speak with you out there I just did not I wasn't clear to me that that was the

case okay does that take care of your question yes thank you mr. cherry after

you sent your letter did you or anyone on your behalf speak to senator

Feinstein personally or with any Senate staffer yes okay I had a phone call with

senator Feinstein okay and when was that that was while I was still in Delaware

so before August 7th okay and how many times did you speak with

senator Feinstein once okay what did you talk about as she asked me some

questions about the incident and I

answered those questions okay was that the extent of the gist of the

conversation yes it was a fairly brief calm phone call okay

did you ever give senator Feinstein or anyone else the permission to release

that letter not that I know of between the letter date July 30th and August the

7th did you speak with any other person about your allegations could you say the

dates again between the letter date of July 30th and August 7th so while you

were still in Delaware did you speak with any other person about your

allegations I'm just trying to remember what dates that stop - you're asking her

with the owners they don't have any lawyers octavo I've spoken with correct

correct correct I think correct then I was interviewing lawyers but I'm not

okay speaking personally about it aside from lawyers that you were seeking

to possibly hire to represent you did you speak to anybody else about it

during that period of time no okay I was staying with my parents at the time did

you talk to them about it definitely not okay

so would it be fair to say that you retained counsel during that time period

of July 30th to August 7th I can't remember the exact date but it was the I

was interviewing lawyers during that period of time sitting in the car in the

driveway and in the Walgreens parking lot and we're hope it's Delaware and

trying to figure out how the whole system works of interviewing lawyers and

how to pick one etc so and I know she did not want

that's why I didn't make the letter public because I couldn't be assured

okay of what would happen and unfortunately that was taken out of my

control let me be clear I did not hide dr. Ford's allegations I did not leak

her story she asked me to hold it confidential and I kept it confidential

as she asked she apparently was stalked by the press felt that what happened she

was forced to come forward and her greatest fear were realized was realized

she's been harassed she's had death threats and she's had to flee her home

in addition the investigation that the Republican majority is heralding is

really nothing that I know about other than a partisan practice normally all

the witnesses would be interviewed however that's not happened while the

majority has reached out to several people they did not notify me or my

staff that they were doing this and so ought to argue that we would not

participate but not tell us what they were up to is somewhat disingenuous I

was given some information by a woman who was very much afraid who asked that

it be held confidential and I held it confidential until she decided that she

would come forward it's my understanding that her story was leaked before the

letter became public and she testified that she had spoken to her friends about

it and it's most likely that that's how the story leaked and that she had been

asked by press but it did not leak from us I assure you of that

almost mr. chairman I'm I'm a little confused I thought only the member of

the House and senator Feinstein and her lawyers had the letter so her friends

she might have talked to about it couldn't leak the letter if they just

had a book verbal conversation unless she

that my copy of the letter a senator I don't think the letter was ever leaked

well how how did the press know to contact her about her complaint she

apparently she testified here this morning that she had talked to friends

about it and that press had talked to her about Dianne Feinstein knew about

this two months earlier if she wanted a really thorough investigation we had all

the time in the world she didn't have to wait till after the hearing was closed

essentially she should have said listen I have a problem I have this report I'd

like the FBI to look at it while we're doing the earrings we had two months no

she didn't do that she waited till we would closed and then she probably

leaked it but you know Who am I to say but she probably leaked it based on a

very bad body language the other day but more importantly in a sense for her to

have waited that period of time and now for you Democrats and I guess I'm

including you to the media right I consider you a part of the Democrat

Party but for you for the Democrats to be talking about we want more time for

the FBI if you wanted more time for the FBI

why didn't Dianne Feinstein bring this up now you know that she showed this to

other Democrats she's not the only one she showed this to other Democrats there

were more than just her that knew about this big confidential thing it was

confidential until the hearing was over after the hearing was over they went

public why didn't they do it during the hearing and we could have had all the

time in the world you know why because they're dishonest people because this

remains a confidential part of the background report I hope that changes

are made and we'll be able to talk more about what the FBI did later but what I

can say is that the most notable part of this report is what's not in it as we

noted by the White House the FBI did not Brett Kavanaugh nor did the FBI

interview dr. Blasi Ford what we've heard from numerous people over the last

few days seeking to provide information to the FBI we have seen even more press

reports of witnesses who wanted to speak with the FBI

but were not interviewed Debra ramirez's lawyers said he was unaware of any

corroborating witnesses who were interviewed candidly what we reviewed

today in a very limited time I was there I had to leave that report is in part

and I had the opportunity to read some but not all of it it looks to be a

product of an incomplete investigation that was limited perhaps by the White

House I don't know but the White House certainly blocked access to millions of

documents from Judge Cavanaugh's record I know that and ensured that 90% of his

emails and memos weren't available for the Senate or the public in the hearings

it now appears that they also blocked the FBI from doing its job Democrats

agreed that the investigation scope should be limited we did not agree that

the White House should tie the FBI's hands it's simply not credible to say

that public testimony in last week's hearing is a substitute for interviews

by FBI agents not only two senators lack the expertise of FBI agents we were only

given five minutes to question Judge Cavanaugh so in my view from what I saw

the investigation was very limited and it will be interesting after all of the

members have an opportunity to read the documents and we have an opportunity in

public to discuss our conclusions what I'm sorry Thank You senator Feinstein I

just have three points to make one we had many fears that this was a very

limited process that would constrain the FBI from getting all the facts having

received a thorough briefing on the documents those fears have been realized

second I disagree having received this the briefing on all of the documents I

disagree with Senator Grassley's statement that there was no hint of

misconduct and third we are reiterating our call given how limited this these

documents were and how limited the scope of this investigation was we are

reiterating our call that the documents with proper redaction be made public

why shouldn't all of America see the facts and second we are reiterating our

call to make the directive that the White House and Council magan sent to

the FBI public because we believe it greatly

constrained the investigation from the get-go the fact that there's only one

document in there for a hundred senators is another example of constraining the

ability of all senators and the American public to see the whole truth and

nothing but a charge made or said to have occurred 36 years ago and nothing

happened since then and look I feel badly for all parties I feel badly for

everybody I feel badly for our country this is so bad for our country but I

will tell you I watched those senators on the Democrat side and I thought it

was a disgrace and partially because I know them I know them too well and you

know what they are not angels thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> Dark Secret Sen. Dianne Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 15:38.

-------------------------------------------

Joji - SLOW DANCING IN THE DARK (justiifi Remix) #BALLADS1 #JojiHype - Duration: 4:00.

♪ Joji: Aye ♪

♪ Joji: I don't want a friend ♪

♪ Joji: I want my life in two ♪

♪ Joji: Waiting to get there ♪

♪ Joji: Waiting for you ♪

♪ Joji: I'ma fight it all night ♪

♪ Joji: When I am around slow dancing in the dark ♪

♪ Joji: Don't follow me you will end up in my arms ♪

♪ Joji: You done made up your mind ♪

♪ Joji: I don't need no more signs ♪

♪ Joji: Can you? ♪

♪ Joji: Can you? ♪

♪ Joji: Give me reasons we should be complete ♪

♪ Joji: You should be with him, I can't compete ♪

♪ Joji: You look at me like I was someone else ♪

♪ Joji: Oh well ♪

♪ Joji: Can't you see? ♪

♪ Joji: Can't you see? ♪

♪ Joji: I don't wanna slow dance ♪

♪ Joji: I don't wanna slow dance ♪

♪ Joji: I don't wanna slow dance ♪

♪ Joji: When you gotta run ♪

♪ Joji: Just hear my voice in you ♪

♪ Joji: Shutting me out with you ♪

♪ Joji: Doing so great ♪

♪ Joji: Yeah ♪

♪ Joji: Used to be the one to hold when you fall ♪

♪ Joji: Yeah, yeah yeah ♪

♪ Joji: I don't fuck with your tone ♪

♪ Joji: I don't wanna go home ♪

♪ Joji: Could it be one night? ♪

♪ Joji: Can you? ♪

♪ Joji: Can you? ♪

♪ Joji: Give me reasons we should be complete ♪

♪ Joji: You should be with him, I can't compete ♪

♪ Joji: You looked at me like I was someone else ♪

♪ Joji: Oh well ♪

♪ Joji: Can't you see? ♪

♪ Joji: Can't you see? ♪

♪ Joji: I don't wanna slow dance ♪

♪ Joji: I don't wanna slow dance ♪

Please subscribe!

For more infomation >> Joji - SLOW DANCING IN THE DARK (justiifi Remix) #BALLADS1 #JojiHype - Duration: 4:00.

-------------------------------------------

Dark Arts And Crafts Ep.1 - Spent Beer Grains - Duration: 4:05.

oh hello there

can you riddle me what this beer and

this bread have in common

follow me to find out.......

so if you are brewing without a home kit you have to

use grains your water becomes wort when

you soak it in grades of your choice for

a beer flavor and type....after you're done

letting the beer soaked in grains you

have all this leftover spent grain in my

highly subjective opinion they're quite

delicious

as bread

behold

this is a basic assembly including the spent grain

here

for storing your grains you have one

week in the fridge and one month in the

freezer I highly recommend using peanut

butter jars they're airtight and they

upcycle so you are also saving the

planet one thing to consider if you are

going to use any bread recipe try to

think about what your grains were....a

stout grain tends to be sweeter and you

can use nutmeg and cinnamon for a winter

bread it is very important to remember

that your grades will be very wet unless

you roast them

temperature in the oven for an hour

ahead of time...... if your grains are past

use for eating they make excellent

compost

I can make a specific episode on how to

make dense ass bread but you're going to

have to ask nicely

so there you have it many ways to keep

your grains out of the gaaaarbaaaage..... and if youuuuu

don't brew, chances are you know somebody

who does

and if you still know no one, you can go

online and find a brewing group....I'm

pretty sure they'll be happy to give

their spent grain

I hope this episode has been

particularly enlightening

For more infomation >> Dark Arts And Crafts Ep.1 - Spent Beer Grains - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

dark souls 2 pvp 【何か】が起こる!! - Duration: 5:30.

For more infomation >> dark souls 2 pvp 【何か】が起こる!! - Duration: 5:30.

-------------------------------------------

YouTube! ! New update | HOW TO UNABLE DARK THEME | Hindi || By Jeet. ... - Duration: 1:34.

For more infomation >> YouTube! ! New update | HOW TO UNABLE DARK THEME | Hindi || By Jeet. ... - Duration: 1:34.

-------------------------------------------

Dark Secret' Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed – Spells Total Disaster For Her Kavanaugh Witch Hunt - Duration: 4:18.

At his rally in Johnson City, Tennessee on Tuesday, President Trump didn't mince words

for California Senator Dianne Feinstein regarding her withholding of Christine Blasey Ford's

letter until the end of the judicial screening process.

RealClearPolitics  "President Trump held a 'Make America

Great Again' rally Monday night in Johnson City, Tennessee on behalf of Rep. Marsha Blackburn,

the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate. Right Side Broadcasting Network reports outside

the rally are the "longest lines" they've ever seen."

And President Trump was on a roll at the rally: "Diane Feinstein, she had this letter for

months and she didn't reveal it until everything was finished," Trump said. "Then she reveals

it and said, 'Oh we want more time.' Let's see how it all works out but I will tell you

what – they are trying to destroy a very fine person and we can't let it happen."

Indeed, Feinstein has had a letter from Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford in her possession

since July; the Palo Alto University professor wrote her senator just after Kavanaugh was

nominated. But instead of making the proper authorities aware of Ford's claims, Feinstein

sat on them for six weeks. During that time, Brett Kavanaugh sat for

65 meetings with various senators, among them, Diane Feinstein. However, the California Democrat

never confronted Kavanaugh about Ford's allegations during any of those meetings.

Likewise, she did not bring up Ford's claims during Kavanaugh's testimony before the

Senate, as he answered hours and hours worth of questions.

Not until the eve of Kavanaugh's confirmation, after the Democrats had already exhausted

all legitimate means of thwarting the judge, did Feinstein make Ford's allegations public.

This, of course, led many to question the validity of the accuser's claims.

After all, if there was anything to Ford's story, why didn't Feinstein bring it forward

sooner? It certainly seemed as though it was all a sleazy political stunt to oust President

Trump's Supreme Court pick. But this may actually be the least of Feinstein's

worries, thanks to her poor handling of Ford's case. "There is a well-established process

of confidentiality on the committee," Sen. Tom Cotton

"Dianne Feinstein could have shown that letter to Chuck Grassley and the two of them,

as the leaders of that committee could have shared it with the FBI who could have discreetly

conducted this inquiry in July and in August without betraying Miss Ford's confidences."

"Dianne Feinstein and her staff [are] going to face an investigation for why they leaked

that," added Cotton. "All of this could have been done discreetly. It happens hundreds

of times — HUNDREDS OF TIMES — every year in the Judiciary Committee."

Feinstein and her minions were hoping no one would mention the Senate's well-established

process of maintaining the confidentiality of accusers. She could have done this the

right way. She could have gone to Grassley and the FBI with Ford's claims when there

was still ample time for them to be investigated before Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing.

The timing of Senator Feinstein's revealing the letter is suspect at best. While protesters

were showing extreme behavior in their demonstrations against Kavanaugh, his confirmation looked

all but assured. Then without warning, Feinstein revealed she

had a letter with claims that Kavanaugh had committed sexual assault against someone who

wished to remain anonymous. Oddly enough, she also revealed she had been in possession

of this letter for nearly 2 months. The tardiness of the letter also casts a shadow

of suspicion against both the Democrats and the accuser. Senator Susan Collins of Maine,

who is considered a potential swing vote in this process, stated in a that:

"What is puzzling to me is the Democrats, by not bringing this out earlier, after having

had this information for more than six weeks, have managed to cast a cloud of doubt on both

the professor and the judge," she said. "If they believed Professor Ford, why didn't

they surface this information earlier so that he could be questioned about it? And if they

didn't believe her and chose to withhold the information, why did they decide at the

11th hour to release it? It is really not fair to either of them the way it is was handled."

This could potentially backfire on Democrats as Collins is one of the few Republicans that

Democrats had hoped to sway into a "no" vote on Kavanaugh. They've just taken a

lot of wind out of those sails. You can see the clip here:

For more infomation >> Dark Secret' Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed – Spells Total Disaster For Her Kavanaugh Witch Hunt - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

How to Lighten Dark Neck Quickly ||Neck Care Tips in Urdu in Hindi || Gardan Ko Gora Karne ka Tairka - Duration: 4:16.

Please Subscribe Rani G Health & Beauty Tips

For more infomation >> How to Lighten Dark Neck Quickly ||Neck Care Tips in Urdu in Hindi || Gardan Ko Gora Karne ka Tairka - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

DARK BOMBER! Fortnite Item Shop October 4, 2018! Today's Fortnite Daily Store Items! - Duration: 1:41.

Yo! What's up! It's Hoop Baller here! Back with a brand new Item Shop video.

Today we have the Item Shop for October 4th 2018, if you guys are new here, hit that sub button guys.

And turn on post notifications you guys never miss one of my Item Shop videos.

You guys are obviously up for a new Item Shop. Today I think we are going to get new items.

I think the Dark Bar or the Dark Bomber. Let see what we have today: we do have that Dark Bomber

Everyone comment Dark Bomber.

In the comment section below and we have the Dark Bag. That's actually super cool!

Let's try to get 100 likes on today's video.

Smash that like button, I really appreciate it. Thunder Crash I'm gonna play the sound

for you guys

this might be better than the rainbow smash and the dark Goliath that's

actually super cool this is actually a really good set but we have breaking

back in the Item Shop too. just to show you guys

Fortune pretty average skin. Radiant Striker Batsickle

warthog pretty ugly glider. I don't think a lot of people have it and the fist pump

but you guys we got a new skins day with the Dark Bomber the Thunder Crush and

the Dark Glyph it's let me know in the comments if you're

gonna buy any of these I hope you enjoyed this Item Shop video if you guys are new here

And turn on post notifications so you guys never miss a video

or almost at 8.4 K so hit that sub button guys. Peace, I'm out!

I'll see you guys for the next Item Shop video!

For more infomation >> DARK BOMBER! Fortnite Item Shop October 4, 2018! Today's Fortnite Daily Store Items! - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Man accused of killing neighbor while hunting after dark pleads guilty - Duration: 1:46.

For more infomation >> Man accused of killing neighbor while hunting after dark pleads guilty - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

Your pooch can bark in the park after dark on Oct. 6 - Duration: 2:35.

For more infomation >> Your pooch can bark in the park after dark on Oct. 6 - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

How HOLD THE DARK's Jeffrey Wright and Jeremy Saulnier survived a Canadian winter | TIFF 2018 - Duration: 8:08.

- Now, should I just go here? - Yeah, that's great, sure.

- Yeah, I'm gonna go to the zoo though,

after this. - Oh, that's awesome.

[Mellow, upbeat music]

- What did you think? - What did I learn,

while making this film?

- Learned how to keep

an iPhone warm

with a foot-warmer.

- Yeah, well, I embraced them dying.

- Yeah.

- Yeah, I like it when phones die, so.

- Yeah. - Other than that,

it's hard to process what you learn.

It takes a while to come out of a movie, out of that fog.

But, I'll tell you this:

it was, you know, flexing a whole lot of new muscles.

I had no idea what I was doing,

and I had to fake it till I made it.

- Hm, hm. [Saulnier chuckles.]

- Well, I was pretty worn out after this film.

I guess I'd finished Westworld

maybe six months before

and I went straight from Westworld to a film

that we shot in an actual, working, maximum-security prison.

I went back to New York, I did another film,

and then went to Cincinnati [on the] first of the year

to do an Emilio Estevez's film, which just played here [at TIFF],

and then, shortly after that, came up to Alberta —

and pretty rugged terrain out there,

which we explored pretty, you know, relatively extensively.

[Branches breaking]

[Wolf barking]

So when I got back,

I was done.

- That's interesting, - Yeah.

- 'Cause I was sitting there prepping for months and months

- Yeah.

- and singularly focused on this one film

- Yeah.

- for the better part of a year and a half,

and I had no idea you'd just done five other projects.

- Yeah. - That was switching gears.

- Yeah, and it was a great culmination, though, this piece,

but the elements are so much a part

of the storytelling by design

and we threw ourselves inside of them,

and I loved it. I loved it,

but I did feel pretty beat up at the end,

which was a good feeling. It's a good feeling to have,

and, again, the amount of effort that it took

for us to pull this thing off

was really made easier, to some extent —

as easy as it could have been — by the crew,

by our Canadian colleagues out in Calgary,

who just busted their asses to facilitate our work.

So yeah, it was great, it was great.

It's just so beautiful too. - It is.

- That part of the world, - Amazing.

- It's so incredibly beautiful,

and, again, I could just continue to talk

about the beauty of those mountains. It was just beautiful,

beautiful country to be in. - Yeah, it's true.

And in that same vein,

I remember one of the few things I did learn...

Because I dare not ask you for feedback on camera

about the process. I'm still learning what my process is.

I don't know what I'm doing.

I'm finding my legs as I progress throughout my career.

But one thing I wasn't doing between my last three films

was having any fun,

or having the presence of mind to recognize and be grateful,

And what Hold the Dark did — and the environment around us —

sometimes I had to actually stop

and look at the mountainside

and the quiet, insulated air

sort of encircled by snow,

and force myself.

'Cause it's so stressful, and it's all logistics,

and a certain part of your brain

is being depleted as you make a movie.

I said, no, I'm gonna — you know, amidst all this tumult

and "Oh, we can't get the snow can up here.

We can't bring a techno crane to this area.

Well, how are we scouting it then?

If I can't shoot here, why am I here?"

I would just flop back in the snow

and look up at the sky

and the cliffs you're talking about, the mountains,

and actually take a minute - Yeah.

- and breathe the fresh air and be grateful.

- Yeah. - And then get back

to pissing and moaning, but hey, it was good.

- Yeah, but the thing that struck me most

about working with you was...

Well, several things, but I think the overriding thing

was your obvious deep,

joyous love of film - Hmmm.

- and love for the process and the frame.

And I remember, at one point,

when we shot that piece

walking across that frozen river

— I guess it was a river valley —

looking at that huge vista, and you were like,

"Dude, that's the most beautiful thing I've ever shot,

I've ever photographed." [Both laughing]

And it was just, you know,

it was just infectious, you know, that spirit.

- Yeah, I still haven't learned how to work with actors. [Wright laughing]

I'll get some— - We had our moments,

you know. - Well no, it's matter of...

It's a language that I don't quite know.

I mean, I know story. - Yeah.

- I know beats, I know how to find, as you say, the music.

When I hear it, I'm very much in tune

and I think I can help guide,

but I should read one of those, like, how-to-talk-to-actor books,

right? - Nah.

- Just don't line read, that's the main one.

- Yeah. - Yeah, you know,

which I never try.

- But you have a very specific eye, a very specific frame,

and that's fantastic, you know.

You have, like, a totally clear, cinematic vision in your head

about what you're getting now

and how that slots into the overall narrative,

but it's all determined.

The footsteps along that narrative journey

are determined by each frame

and you, you know, you've got it dialed in.

And the thing that I found sometimes

is I'd show up on set and it'd be like, "What?

We're doing what?"

But 99.9% of the time, it all made sense

and it all served the interests of the,

you know, of what I needed to do.

And so I had to figure out a couple of times

to bitch about something though,

- Well, yeah. - It can't all be perfect,

you know. That makes me feel uncomfortable.

- Well, no, but I think any small friction we had

was — and I welcome it, because it's — because you care,

- Well, that's, you know. - and for me,

that's the big thing, - Yeah.

- is having input

and having a real stake in the story we're telling.

- Yeah. - That's, you know...

- Yeah, well, it was a big monster

that we were pushing up that snowy hill,

- Yeah. - you know, so...

And it was fun, and it was — and I think, again,

you know, we go back to the book

and to making the script,

which was just so well crafted,

and the architecture of the thing was so well considered,

and it was like, let's do justice to this thing.

And, as well,

you know, the character of Core...

There was such a kind of humanity

written into him - Hmmm.

- and such an odd,

unwitting heroicism, - Hmmm.

- written into him.

So, yeah, yeah, yeah, I dug being there, yeah.

- Well, it was awesome to have you.

- [Interviewer] Thank you so much

for being here. - Oh, whoa, wow!

- That was it? - We did the run.

- [Interviewer] One question,

and you guys just killed it.

- Cool! - Thank you so much

for doing this. - Awesome, cool.

[Mellow upbeat music]

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét