Thứ Tư, 24 tháng 10, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Oct 24 2018

progress on talks between North Korea and the u.s. have been slowed in recent

weeks especially after the Trump administration announced that a second

summit with Kim jong-un would not happen until after the midterm elections on

November 6th our discussions are said to be ongoing towards holding working-level

and high-level talks and now a South Korean official says that the u.s. is

ready and is waiting for response eg1 reports a high-level meeting between

North Korea and the u.s. is likely to take place as soon as the north is ready

the senior South Korean official with knowledge of the north korea u.s. talks

told reporters in Washington on Tuesday that high-level talks are still being

discussed but a specific date and venue has not yet been confirmed as the North

is not giving an answer US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said

in an interview with Voice of America last week that is hopeful a senior-level

meeting between himself and his North Korean counterpart will take place in

the next week and a half or so the South Korean official added the u.s. is ready

for the meeting and it'll likely take place as soon as the North replies on

speculation the North Korean leaders younger sister kim yo-jong who serves as

the first vice department director of the central committee could be the

counterpart Pompeo mentioned the South Korean official said it seems the u.s.

is also unsure pompeius counterpart had been devised

chairman of North Korea's ruling party's Central Committee kim jung-tae but he

did not join the latest talks between Pompeo and North Korean leader Kim

jong-un during the Secretary's fourth visit to the north the South Korean

official also touched on the working-level talks between North

Korea's Vice foreign minister chessani and US Special Representative for North

Korea Stephen vegan which was agreed by Kim jong-un back in October while the

meeting has yet to take place the official said that too will happen once

the north is ready he added the working-level meeting will cover the

joint declaration escort and even communication network for the second

summit so it takes time to prepare the official says north

Korea has been everything into this game including the dismantlement of its

nuclear assets and facilities and thus pyongyang has to be careful and

thoroughly prepared for the deal the official expects the north will

maintain its request for security assurances and the lifting of sanctions

during its talks with the US adding he expects the declaration to end the

Korean War to be crystallized during the working-level tops Jiwon Arirang news

For more infomation >> North Korea-U.S. high-level meeting to take place once North Korea is ready: S. Korean official - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

The U.S. Has Identified People Implicated in Khashoggi's Death - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> The U.S. Has Identified People Implicated in Khashoggi's Death - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Administration: U.S. to Revoke Some Saudi Visas - Duration: 3:20.

For more infomation >> Trump Administration: U.S. to Revoke Some Saudi Visas - Duration: 3:20.

-------------------------------------------

Cyber Security In The US Is A Complete Joke - Duration: 4:20.

Cyber security here in the United States currently is an absolute joke.

Earlier this week, a settlement was reached with Yahoo for the world's largest data breach

that took place in 2013 and 2014 and affected close to 200 million people here in the United

States.

Three billion, actually, worldwide were effected by the hack that took place with Yahoo accounts,

2013 and 2014 and to make it worse, the company actually kept it a secret for two years before

finally letting users know, "By the way, your address, your name, your phone number, your

date of birth and other personal information, yeah, that's all been stolen by hackers and

that was actually stolen a couple of years ago.

Oops.

Our bad."

The same thing, I think, with up to 50 million users affected here in the US just happened

with Facebook.

A couple hundred million people also had their personal data breached with Equifax about

a year and a half, two years ago almost.

These hacks and these security breaches have become the new normal with online internet

service providers, email providers, social media sites, credit monitoring organizations,

they all have such poor security.

The United States is in absolutely no position to put any kind of security up there that

our data is permanently at risk.

If you're on Facebook, if you've got a Gmail, if you've got a Yahoo email account, if you

subscribe to one of these crediting monitoring services, your data is currently at risk.

We have seen too many stories like this come out in recent years and here's the biggest

problem.

The reason why we're not seeing any action on cyber security is because of the lobbying

and campaign money coming from these organizations who actually profit off of it.

Equifax is a great example.

They did not lose their government contract even after they leaked all of our personal

data that we never gave them, actually, and that's one of the worst things about it.

We didn't give them our data.

They actually got it from the government and then accidentally leaked it and then got another

government contract after it was revealed that they did this.

Then companies like Equifax actually profit even more when other groups like Yahoo or

Facebook accidentally let our data get stolen because as part of this new settlement with

Yahoo, which still has to be approved by a district judge, that's coming up late November,

they're gonna offer people $375, assuming you can prove that your data was stolen and

you had to spend your personal time dealing with the fallout from that.

If you can't prove that you had to deal with anything from it, you get $125 but nonetheless,

that money is actually supposed to be spent paying a credit monitoring service to make

sure nothing bad happens with your data.

You don't even get to keep that money from the settlement.

That actually goes back to these other corporations, most of which are actually subsidiaries of

big banks here in the US so they profit again off of your stolen data.

That's how it works in the United States, that's why we have such poor cyber security,

why cyber security laws in the US are lagging so far behind the rest of the world because

we don't care enough to let corporations be punished and instead, we actually reward them

when they put everything you have worked for for your entire life up for hackers to grab.

That's what's happening in the United States and unfortunately, it appears that all of

our internet service providers, our cell phone providers, social media sites, all of them

are vulnerable because the US continues to fail to act.

For more infomation >> Cyber Security In The US Is A Complete Joke - Duration: 4:20.

-------------------------------------------

Merkel looks to open up Germany's market to US gas imports - Duration: 4:30.

For more infomation >> Merkel looks to open up Germany's market to US gas imports - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

WaPo: President Donald Trump Allows States To Skirt Obamacare Requirements | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 11:00.

For more infomation >> WaPo: President Donald Trump Allows States To Skirt Obamacare Requirements | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 11:00.

-------------------------------------------

Why Khashoggi's death is a 'major crisis' for U.S.-Saudi relationship - Duration: 7:34.

JUDY WOODRUFF: We return to the killing of a Saudi Arabian journalist in Istanbul.

As we reported, Turkey's President Erdogan called for those responsible for the murder

to be put on trial in his country.

And the U.S. has increased its pressure on Saudi Arabia.

Nick Schifrin is back.

NICK SCHIFRIN: President Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo both expressed displeasure

with Saudi Arabia.

That came after Turkey's president said Saudi Arabia premeditated Khashoggi's death.

To talk about all that, we turn to Eric Edelman.

He was U.S. ambassador to Turkey during the George W. Bush administration.

He's also held senior posts at the Defense Department and on the White House staff.

And Henri Barkey, who served in the State Department's Policy Planning Office during

the Clinton administration.

He is now a professor of international relations at Lehigh University.

After the attempted coup in Turkey in 2016, there were a number of false reports in Turkish

newspapers that he was one of the coup plotters.

And welcome to you both.

Ambassador Edelman, let me start with you.

President Trump called this a cover-up today.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo talked about visa revocations and also plans for sanctions.

Is the response from the U.S. today appropriate, given the nature of the crime and the seriousness

of this crisis?

ERIC EDELMAN, Former State Department and Defense Department Official: Well, Nick, I

think it is appropriate.

I think the administration at the outset was trying to put the best possible face on this

because of the importance it attaches to the U.S.-Saudi relationship.

But I think they recognize now that there is a head of steam building up on the Hill.

There are a lot of people who have supported the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its relationship

with the United States in the past, like Lindsey Graham, who are quite concerned about this.

And I think the administration is trying to get ahead of what will undoubtedly be an important

push for sanctions.

I'm not sure they're going to be able to get ahead of that, because, as your piece noted,

this is major crisis in the U.S.-Saudi relationship, certainly the biggest one since 9/11.

If evidence is found that actually links Mohammed bin Salman directly to the killing of Jamal

Khashoggi, this will become an existential crisis for this relationship.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Henri Barkey, a lot of this has been pushed by Turkish President Erdogan

and anonymous leaks by Turkish officials.

We saw Turkish President Erdogan's speech today.

Is he motivated by Jamal Khashoggi's death, or is he also motivated by his presence and

his place in the region?

HENRI BARKEY, Lehigh University: Well, he has two major aims here.

There has always been a competition between Saudi Arabia and Turkey for leadership in

the region.

But what Mr. Erdogan really wants at this stage is to be able to use the pressure he

can muster to get -- to essentially dislodge Mohammed bin Salman, MBS, from power, because

he sees MBS essentially as being very, very anti-Turkish, and he sees MBS as a block against

Turkish ambitions in the region.

But, beyond that, what he's also trying to do is to use the gift essentially the Saudis

gave him to improve Turkey's very, very tarnished reputation internationally.

I mean, after all, let's not forget that this is the country that is the largest jailer

of journalists and NGO folks.

They -- only recently they released Pastor Brunson, after two years in jail under really

ridiculous charges.

There are three American State Department employees in jail in Turkey.

So, Erdogan is trying to essentially change the conversation and put pressure on the Saudis.

And By saying that he wants the perpetrators to be judged in Turkey, he's putting more

pressure on the Saudis and keeping the conversation going.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Eric Edelman, to put more pressure on the Saudis is one thing.

To dislodge, as we just heard Henri Barkey say, to dislodge MBS, is that really possible?

ERIC EDELMAN: It's hard to tell, because what goes on inside the House of Saud is very opaque,

I think, to outsiders.

There certainly have been historical examples in the past of not just crown princes, but

kings being replaced, so that's not unprecedented.

What is unprecedented has been the accumulation of power that Mohammed bin Salman has had

in his hands over the last year-and-a-half.

Whether that means he's made a lot of enemies, who now may find this an opportune time to

act, or whether he still has overwhelming control, I think what you saw today, as your

piece showed, was efforts to at least put on a face of unity.

Whether that will continue to be the case, I think, is anybody's guess at this point.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Henri Barkey, most of the information we have that's at least public has come from

Erdogan today and also anonymous leaks in the Turkish media.

How believable are some of these leaks?

And what's motivating this constant pressure through the media that officials around Erdogan

have been doing?

HENRI BARKEY: Well, this is a very good question.

I mean, there have been leaks now for two weeks almost, and those leaks included very,

very sordid details, including torture.

There was a suggestion that they had video and audio, and yet Mr. Erdogan didn't mention

these things today in his speech.

And So far the Turks have not produced any of this evidence.

I suspect there is no such audio -- or certainly not video.

It's not that easy to bug an embassy.

And Ambassador Edelman will tell you probably from his own experience that they do sweep

embassies fairly often.

But the interesting thing about these leaks is that we saw the Western press essentially

buy all these leaks as if they were the truth.

I mean, nobody ever produced any evidence that his fingers were cut.

And yet every single newspaper repeated that, and you see it everywhere as if it's a fact.

But this was -- has been very, very effective.

It has made the Turks look as a serious source and allowed them to determine the agenda.

NICK SCHIFRIN: It has been very effective, Eric Edelman, on putting pressure on Saudi

Arabia and personally on putting pressure on Mohammed bin Salman.

The White House's priorities for the region largely go through Saudi Arabia.

Quickly, in the time we have left, how dependent is the U.S. on MBS Himself vs. a historic

dependence and alliance on Saudi Arabia?

ERIC EDELMAN: Well, I think, Nick, you put yourself -- you put your finger on what I

think is the biggest problem we face right now, which is we have big interests in Saudi

Arabia, have had for a long time.

There are energy interests.

There are geopolitical interests.

It's impossible to have a containment strategy, for instance, with Iran without Saudi Arabia

playing some role in it.

But, although the administration has elevated the relationship with Saudi Arabia since it

came in, it has made it a relationship between families, between Jared Kushner and Mohammed

bin Salman, between the Al Saud and Trump families.

We need to have a relationship that is institutionalized and based on the state institutions.

And I think what you're seeing, with the role Secretary Pompeo is playing, that Gina Haspel

is playing in her trip to Turkey...

NICK SCHIFRIN: The CIA director.

ERIC EDELMAN: ... is to try now and get this back into an institutional relationship, rather

than a family-to-family relationship.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Ambassador Eric Edelman, Professor Henri Barkey, thank you very much.

HENRI BARKEY: Thank you.

For more infomation >> Why Khashoggi's death is a 'major crisis' for U.S.-Saudi relationship - Duration: 7:34.

-------------------------------------------

Turkey's president wants to drive a wedge between US and Saudi Arabia: Bryan Suits - Duration: 7:54.

For more infomation >> Turkey's president wants to drive a wedge between US and Saudi Arabia: Bryan Suits - Duration: 7:54.

-------------------------------------------

Republicans gain ground in Texas, Nevada U S Senate races - Duration: 4:46.

For more infomation >> Republicans gain ground in Texas, Nevada U S Senate races - Duration: 4:46.

-------------------------------------------

Migrant Caravan: What Happens If It Reaches The US Border? - Duration: 2:09.

For more infomation >> Migrant Caravan: What Happens If It Reaches The US Border? - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

Fact-Checking Trump's Immigration Rhetoric As Migrant Caravan Marches Toward U.S. | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 2:13.

For more infomation >> Fact-Checking Trump's Immigration Rhetoric As Migrant Caravan Marches Toward U.S. | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

Scott Wallace on 2018 U.S. House election for PA 1st District - Duration: 3:34.

I would not say that we agree on climate I would not say that we agree on guns

There's so many differences. Number one he takes endless corporate PAC money and

I do not I will not take a dime from a corporate pack or a lobbyist he's taken

a million bucks he is anti-choice he wants to defund

Planned Parenthood I believe in a woman's right to choose

I believe in Planned Parenthood on guns he says he wants to prevent gun violence

but he is for the NRA's number one legislative priority: concealed carry

reciprocity which is allowing someone from Texas from out of state come into

Pennsylvania with a concealed weapon that is legal in Texas and walk into a

church or a school here in Pennsylvania no matter what Pennsylvania law says

that's Brian Fitzpatrick's priority on guns

I think Democrats that everybody needs to take a deep breath and wait for

Robert Mueller to do his job. I am running to get a seat in the US Congress which

will in essence be a jury on whatever Robert Mueller decides you don't get on

to a jury with your mind already made up to convict or to acquit let's wait

The biggest challenge for our criminal justice system is switching what we

measure, switching the metrics instead of measuring just convictions let's measure

crime prevention. Let's count our successes at getting a drug addict off

drugs, at getting someone with mental illness the treatment that they need

someone with PTSD getting them the proper treatment we must focus more on

preventing recidivism than simply locking people up

Yes, I believe drugs must be treated as a health problem and the number one

mission should be harm reduction we have to reduce the amount of addiction the

amount of disease and the more the government can regulate and see the

harms that are being caused and play a constructive role in making them more

healthy and perhaps intervene with access to treatment the better off

society will be less drug abuse and less crime

I support of reconfiguring of our tax system which currently is skewed toward

the very top end the tax bill that we just enacted two trillion dollars the

vast majority of it went to wealthy investors, 40% of whom by the way are not

American so $400 billion was shipped abroad in the form of boosted

value of stocks that were bought back by the companies we can do so much more if

we target that four hundred billion dollars or that trillion dollars or the

next three trillion dollar bill that the Republicans have teed up targeted

specifically to creating jobs building infrastructure raising wages fund the

Department of Labor to improve working conditions and strengthen unions so that

they can collectively bargain for better wages and working conditions for the

working people of America

For more infomation >> Scott Wallace on 2018 U.S. House election for PA 1st District - Duration: 3:34.

-------------------------------------------

Tens Of Thousands Of Migrants Continue Caravan Journey To US - Duration: 1:43.

For more infomation >> Tens Of Thousands Of Migrants Continue Caravan Journey To US - Duration: 1:43.

-------------------------------------------

Vote Cindy Wilson for State Superintendent - Duration: 0:31.

In Idaho, when something doesn't work, we fix it.

So when Idaho schools rank forty eighth in the nation - it's time for new leadership.

Cindy Wilson has thirty years of teaching experience in communities across Idaho.

Trusted by Governor Otter to oversee an important state agency

Cindy is committed to increasing graduation rates and recruiting high-quality teachers

Real experience to get Idaho schools back on track.

Vote Cindy Wilson for Superintendent.

For more infomation >> Vote Cindy Wilson for State Superintendent - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

US confirms withdrawal from nuclear arms treaty with Russia World news - Duration: 3:41.

US confirms withdrawal from nuclear arms treaty with Russia World news

John Bolton said Russia had been violating treaty for years and rising powers such as China meant there is a 'new strategic reality'

John Bolton said Russia had been violating treaty for years and rising powers such as China meant there is a 'new strategic reality'

The US national security adviser, John Bolton, has confirmed that the US will withdrawal from the landmark intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty (INF) after meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin and senior Russian officials.

Speaking in Moscow, Bolton said that Russia had been violating the treaty for years and that rising powers such as China meant that it was a "new strategic reality out there".

Bolton also said that China's cyber-attacks against the United States made Russia seem like the "junior partner". He did not go into detail.

The INF was a "bilateral treaty in a multipolar ballistic missile world", Bolton said, adding that no formal steps had yet been taken but that the US would exit the treaty "in due course".

The treaty, concluded in 1987, barred the United States and Russia from deploying missiles with a range from 500 to 5,500 km, and largely was credited with banishing nuclear missiles from Europe.

Bolton avoided directly answering questions from press about whether "we'll soon be seeing US missiles in Europe", saying only that the single country constrained by the INF treaty was the United States.

"It is the American position that Russia is in violation," Bolton said at Interfax, the same press agency where he discussed US plans to withdrawal from the anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2001. "Russia's position is that they aren't. So one has to ask how to ask the Russians to come back into compliance with something they don't think they're violating."

Bolton also announced that Putin would meet with Donald Trump for talks when the two leaders are in Paris next month for the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day, marking the formal end of the first world war.

It will be the first meeting between the two presidents since their controversial Helsinki summit in July, and just their fourth meeting in person since Trump became president.

Russia played up the meeting, with a Kremlin aide saying the talks would be "a full-fledged meeting. There will be serious preparations."

Bolton met with Putin at the Kremlin on Tuesday, where he came to explain the US exit from the INF. The Russian leader joked that the US seal showed an eagle carrying olives branches and arrows. "The question is: did your eagle already eat all the olives and only the arrows are left?"

"Hopefully I'll have some answers for you," Bolton replied. "But I didn't bring any more olives."

The two also discussed cooperation in Syria and accusations that Russia was meddling in US elections. Bolton on Monday said that he had confronted Russia on its elections meddling, but also said that the interference had little effect on the outcome of the 2016 elections, a view that seemed tailored to Donald Trump.

"What the meddling did create was distrust and animosity within the United States," Bolton said on Tuesday when asked about his remarks. "It made it almost impossible for the US and Russia to make progress diplomatically for two years. That's a huge loss to both countries but mostly to Russia. It's a message to Russia: don't mess with American elections."

A Kremlin aide, Yuri Ushakov, on Tuesday evening said that US accusations about elections interference were "mentioned but not discussed", according to Interfax.

"In fact, both the president and Mr Bolton decided to abandon mutual accusations and hold this serious, normal substantive conversation, and they did," he said, according to Interfax.

For more infomation >> US confirms withdrawal from nuclear arms treaty with Russia World news - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick on 2018 U.S. House election for PA 1st District - Duration: 3:19.

Roots in the district, for sure. Been from the district and voting in the district

my whole life where he just voted for himself the first time this year in the

primary that's a big difference certainly our economic status I'm living

in a one-bedroom condo he's got properties all over the planet self

funding his campaign I think he's worth about you know seven hundred several

hundred million dollars but I would say the biggest difference is our approach

I'm a problem-solver I'm in the problem solvers caucus he's criticized that

caucus he's more of a party line guy and I'm more of a bipartisan approach to

government

Supporting a livable wage which we talked about this before I don't like

using the term livable wage rather than minimum wage identifying what that wage is

and attaching it to the CPI the Consumer Price Index and allowing it to track

inflation so the real purchasing power stays the same I don't think that

anybody in this country who is working should be not able to sustain themselves

from a food standpoint, from a clothing standpoint, from the basic necessities, so

I would support anything that would advance that

Ultimately moving to a public financing system. I think the money politics is a

huge problem. I was in the FBI when Citizens United when the decision came

down I believe it was April of 2010 if I'm not mistaken I was working for then

Director Mueller and my reaction of the case was it was going to lead to more

corruption. Having worked in the corruption unit, money is a root of all

problems including including especially in politics leading to corruption and I

think the more we can get that out of it and we'll have more parity and get the

the influence of special interests out the better we'll be

I think it's a bad idea. You know, I keep an open mind on virtually literally

everything and myself, Josh Shapiro has come to the same conclusion you know you

never discount anything but I think that this would be a problem on a whole host

of fronts obviously the goal with anyone in treatment of recovery is giving them

that light at the end of the tunnel. I think with something like that it poses

far too many problems. There'd be too many unintended consequences, you

know there's two things that Josh and I had discussed: the PDMP program and the

IMD exclusion issue I think those if we focus on that that's really the way to

go here

Well I got endorsed by Mike Bloomberg, Everytown USA, and Gabby Giffords

for this very reason. I've been a leader on gun safety. The Problem Solvers Caucus

has a whole slate of legislation that starts with universal background checks

gun violence restraining orders, no-fly no-buy, repealing the Dickey amendment to

allow NIH funding to go towards gun violence research there's a whole slate

of bills that you can go to the problem solvers website they're the bills we

endorsed it finds that balance between constitutional protection and community

safety they are not mutually exclusive we can advance both together

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét