Auto news on Youtube Aug 31 2018

But before we do that, give us the big picture for people that are just joining us for the

very first time.

Hindson: Okay, John.

We're coming up on the halfway point of the book of Revelation.

Chapter 1 is like the preface, the introduction.

The risen Christ appears to John on the island of Patmos and commissions His own personal

disciple, "Write the book of the Revelation."

Then in chapters 2 and 3 Jesus proclaims, a proclamation of the letters to the seven

churches in Asia Minor back on the coast.

And to each church He speaks as Lord of the church with authority.

And then we came to the section where you have the problem that had to be resolved in

the book in chapters 4 and 5.

John was caught up into heaven.

He sees God the Father on the throne.

The seven-sealed scroll is in His hand, but no one is found worthy to open the seals and

proclaim the inheritance until the Lamb appears.

And Jesus then appears throughout the book of Revelation symbolically as the Lamb of

God, the one who died for our sins.

He is worthy; He can come and open the scroll, pronounce the judgments.

And then we saw that as He opened the seals you begin to see a process of judgment that

follows in chapters 6 through 11.

The six seals are opened; the wrath of the Lamb is being poured out.

Then you have an interlude.

Then the seventh seal is opened.

And out of the seventh seal come the sounding of the seven trumpet judgments.

And then after the seven trumpet judgments, reach the sixth one, all of a sudden you have

another interlude that deals with the little book that John was told to eat[!?] and two

dead men that are going to be killed [!?] and yet resurrected and will come back to life!?

What in the world is all of that about right there in the middle of the book of Revelation?

Ankerberg: Yes.

Let's start, Ron, with the little book.

What in the world is this little book that they're talking about?

Rhodes: Well, there's different interpretations as to what that little book is.

In fact, just recently I was looking at some commentaries and one guy thought it was maybe

a title deed of the earth, kind of similar to what we talked about earlier with the other

book.

Ankerberg: With the scrolls.

Rhodes: There's others who say it's the seven-sealed scroll itself.

I personally believe that it contains information about the prophecies that are yet to come

during the tribulation period.

And, in fact, if I was to title it, I would title it "Things to Come," kind of like

the book of one of my old professors, Dwight Pentecost.

The reason I think it contains that information is that John is portrayed as eating the book.

And it's sweet to the taste, but then it becomes sour.

And what I think that means is that he's talking about the good stuff that's yet

ahead for Christians.

We've got the millennial kingdom coming; we've got the eternal state which is just

indescribably great.

So that's sweet.

But then as it goes down to his stomach it turns sour.

And I think that that probably metaphorically represents the prophecies about unbelievers

and the judgments that are yet to come for them, especially those terrible, terrible

bowl judgments at the end that will unfold in rapid-fire fashion.

For more infomation >> What is the "little book" that John was told to eat? - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Denuclearization talks stall as North Korea goes strong on what U.S. can offer - Duration: 2:29.

Amid stalled nuclear talks between the U.S. and North Korea... we have more on that letter

North Korea has sent to the U.S.,... in which,... the regime asked Washington to bring something

to the table.... if it wants to talk in Pyongyang.

The U.S., meanwhile, has renewed its ban on Americans traveling to the North.

Lee Ji-won starts us off.

It appears U.S. President Donald Trump didn't have a choice but to call off his Secretary

of State's fourth visit to Pyongyang as Washington had "nothing to offer" the regime.

Citing an unnamed government official, Reuters reported Thursday what was in the secret letter

Kim Yong-chol, vice chairman of North Korea's Workers' Party's central committee, sent to

the U.S.

It said "Mike Pompeo should not come to Pyongyang, if the U.S. has nothing to offer."

The regime has been asking the U.S. to declare an end to the Korean War, while the Trump

administration has been pushing Pyongyang for a inventory of its nuclear and missile

programs and other military assets.

The official added that the North Koreans seem to be thinking the U.S. is not fulfilling

its side of the bargain,... which appears to back up a report by U.S.-based media outlet

Vox, which said President Trump promised North Korean leader Kim Jong-un a peace treaty sometime

soon after their summit in June.

But the Trump administration continues to insist denuclearization has to take place

before anything else.

Amid concerns over the stalemate, the U.S. remains firm on its restrictions on the regime.

The U.S. State Department has extended its ban on Americans' travel to North Korea for

another year,... until August 31st 2019.

It cited concerns about the threat of arrest.

U.S. law stipulates that travel restrictions on Americans may be imposed if "there is imminent

danger to the public health or physical safety of U.S. travelers in the country or area."

But it's known that "individuals who wish to travel to or within North Korea for extremely

limited purposes," and whose travel is in the U.S. national interest, can apply for

a "special validation" from the State Department.

There will also be exceptions if the trip is justified by "compelling humanitarian considerations."

The ban was imposed in September last year after the death of American student Otto Warmbier,

who was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor by the North after allegedly trying to steal

a propaganda sign.

Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Denuclearization talks stall as North Korea goes strong on what U.S. can offer - Duration: 2:29.

-------------------------------------------

Lucy Laney Elementary school has done what some thought was impossible - Duration: 5:44.

For more infomation >> Lucy Laney Elementary school has done what some thought was impossible - Duration: 5:44.

-------------------------------------------

Dirty Bomb: 1.0 Is Here - Duration: 5:38.

For more infomation >> Dirty Bomb: 1.0 Is Here - Duration: 5:38.

-------------------------------------------

What made Paul Taylor one of the most influential creators in modern dance - Duration: 3:48.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Finally tonight: remembering a giant in the world of dance and the performing

arts, choreographer Paul Taylor.

Jeffrey Brown has our remembrance of his career and why he became one of the most influential

creators in his field.

JEFFREY BROWN: Joyful, athletic, and lyrical, Paul Taylor's choreography was often complex,

always human.

Hailed as a towering figure of modern dance, Taylor's success in movement group from a

unique eye for observation, as he told me when we met in 2007.

PAUL TAYLOR, Choreographer: Watching people has always been something that I have done

even as a kid.

And I changed schools a lot.

And I knew almost immediately who was going to be the class bully, who to watch out for.

And you can tell sometimes by the way they move.

And walking is the most revealing.

A walk is like a fingerprint.

No two people walk the same.

JEFFREY BROWN: Taylor was born in 1930 and spent part of his early years on a farm in

Maryland.

An athlete in his youth, he went to Syracuse University on a swimming scholarship, but

discovered a love for dance in his 20s.

PAUL TAYLOR: I fell in love with the idea of dance.

It just hit me all of a sudden.

And the idea of being a dancer was like the idea of being a flame.

And I loved to move.

JEFFREY BROWN: At 6 feet tall, he was a virtuosic performer who quickly captured the attention

of dance legends, performing with Martha Graham, Merce Cunningham, and George Balanchine, before

devoting himself to his own troupe, the Paul Taylor Dance Company.

There, he created and perform landmark works like "Aureole," a 1962 piece choreographed

to music by Handel that remains in the company's performance repertoire today.

Taylor even pushed the boundaries for what was considered dance, as in his minimalist

1957 work called "Duet," where, for four minutes, he and a reclining woman never moved.

Over more than six decades, Taylor explored all aspects of the human experience, from

joy to the horror of war.

And he offered his audiences a range of styles, from the classical to slapstick.

PAUL TAYLOR: Dance, I think, consciously or unconsciously, symbolizes life.

And it reflects the human condition.

It tells us the joys, the sorrows, the fallacies, the idiocies, the brilliance, anything human.

JEFFREY BROWN: Taylor himself retired from performing in 1974, but continued to choreograph,

often still polishing movement even in dress rehearsals.

PAUL TAYLOR: OK, good.

JEFFREY BROWN: He created an astounding body of work, at least two new dancers a year,

for a total of 147 pieces.

In recent years, Taylor took steps to ensure a continuing life for his troupe, naming dancer

Michael Novak as its next artistic director.

And the company will continue to tour worldwide.

PAUL TAYLOR: I think there will always be a need for dance, for dancers to dance and

for watchers to watch.

I believe that.

I have to believe that.

JEFFREY BROWN: Paul Taylor died Wednesday in Manhattan of kidney failure.

He was 88 years old.

For more infomation >> What made Paul Taylor one of the most influential creators in modern dance - Duration: 3:48.

-------------------------------------------

John McCain's good friend, Chuck Larson, was 'synonymous with what is good at the Naval Academy' - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> John McCain's good friend, Chuck Larson, was 'synonymous with what is good at the Naval Academy' - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

What is the standard for medical malpractice? - Duration: 6:34.

My name is Zaheer A. Shah, M.D. J.D.

I'm the principal and founding partner of Shah

and Associates. It's a medical malpractice

and personal injury law firm based

currently in Tempe, Arizona.

Well, medical negligence, before we talk

about that let's talk a little bit about

just what negligence itself is.

So negligence is essentially a failure to

act reasonably. That's the standard that

is used by the courts to determine what

is a proper or improper act.

Now, let me give you an example of that.

So with respect to the automobile

industry... Over time, negligence or a

failure to act responsibly or reasonably,

evolves. For example, brake lights.

Initially there were no brake lights on

a car, but then over time we determined

that in order for the car to be

reasonably safe it should have brake

lights, and then eventually we evolved to

the point where you also have safety

harnesses, safety belts, and now even

airbags. And I'm sure the future will

hold even further advances that

determine or define what reasonable is,

and the reasonable is the exact opposite

of negligence. Because the medical space

is a much more sophisticated service

area where you have highly trained

providers, medical negligence has to be

really carefully defined. And the term of

art that's used in that space is

"standard of care." So we expect all

providers not to be outstanding

providers, but to at least meet a basic

threshold standard of care that they

deliver to the patients that they are

caring for. How is that standard of care

arrived that will distinguish negligence

from something that is not negligent?

Well there's a lot of factors that go

into that. It can be determined or

dependent on where the provider is

practicing. So if you're in a remote

rural area, the standard of care may be

completely different than if you're

practicing in Boston. If you are a

specialist versus a general practitioner,

the standard of care may vary. Ultimately,

negligence or meeting the standard of

care or lack thereof is one of the

critical elements that are necessary to

prove

in order to have an effective or

successful medical malpractice lawsuit.

So it's one of three really critical

areas of the litigation of one of my

clients injuries at the hands of a

medical provider that I have to fulfill.

So negligence as we understand it is

about standard of care, and the real

analysis is, is did the provider meet

that standard of care? Because if they

didn't,

that's medical negligence. Well a lot of

people when they think about medical

negligence, they assume that as long as

they find negligence, or they've been the

victim of negligence, that they've got a

lawsuit. And oftentimes I have to be the

bearer of bad news, which is to state

that, "no, there's a lot more that goes

into whether or not you're going to have

a viable medical malpractice lawsuit."

So what I oftentimes suggest is, is begin

with, what was the harm or injury that

had been sustained? If the harm or injury

is substantial and likely permanent, then

that's a case that needs to be

investigated more fully. Once you do that,

then you have to look at, was there a

standard of care violation? Was the

provider that rendered the care that

resulted in this substantial and

permanent injury, was that care above

that standard of care or was it below?

Now keep in mind again, we're not

expecting our providers to be

extraordinary caregivers or to practice

in the latest state-of-the-art, that's

not what the law requires or expects of

them. There is a lowest common

denominator however, which is communally

determined by the community of providers

who all would agree that this is the

basic minimum that must be fulfilled in

order for that provider, in that space, at

that time, with that particular patient,

is meeting the standard of care. Now as

you can imagine, that becomes somewhat

controversial. So the doctor defendant is

going to find medical experts that say

she met the standard of care. As a

plaintiff's attorney, one of my

obligations or responsibilities is to

find medical experts that will further

my client's case, which is to establish that

there was in fact a breach or a

violation of the standard of care.

So medical negligence or a violation of

standard of care is a critical element

in furthering a medical malpractice

lawsuit, but it's not the only one.

So we were talking about the elements that are

required or must be fulfilled in order

for there to be a successful medical

malpractice lawsuit, for there to be a

resolution to it that is hopefully in

favor of your client. Well you clearly

have to have medical negligence,

that's that standard of care that we've

been talking about. Our argument is if

there's been a violation or a breach in

the standard of care, that equals medical

negligence. But that's not enough. We then

have to prove that that medical

negligence actually resulted or caused

the damages or injuries that we're

claiming harm for. And sometimes what

happens is, is there can in fact be

medical negligence, but there may be some

other intervening event, or some other

complication that actually resulted in

the harms. And so we have to very

closely - proximately is the legal term -

but I tell my clients that means it has

to be closely connected, not just a

general sense of, "well this could have

caused that." But no, we have to yolk it

together very nicely and tightly that

the medically negligent act is what

directly and proximately caused the

harms for which we are now seeking

recovery. Sometimes, a case can actually

fail, not because there wasn't any

negligence, and not because there weren't

sufficient damages that are substantial

and permanent, but because of an

inability to connect causally the

medical negligence and that harm, which

is why one of the medical experts that

are utilized in medical malpractice

lawsuits are actually causation experts.

So you can have a standard of care

expert to talk about how the standard of

care was violated or breached, but then

you also will require a causation expert

who can use her special expertise to say,

"I believe based upon a review of all of

the facts in this case that that

medically negligent act in fact caused

the harms for which we are now seeking

damages or recovery."

For more infomation >> What is the standard for medical malpractice? - Duration: 6:34.

-------------------------------------------

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE REACH AT THE END OF MAP GTA V - Duration: 9:10.