Auto news on Youtube Aug 30 2018

We've put all these stumbling blocks in the

way of just basic human conversation

We can't make any assumptions about

someone based on their appearance, we

simply have to use this very careful

skirting around the edges of conversation and it

means people can't act in a way that

they always have in society. If they see

a woman wearing a dress, they say

"she's doing this" or "she's doing that" and

they get all hoity-toity and say "well I'm

a He, How dare you! You've offended me!" I

understand the kind of conversation

people are having but the laws are being

shaped to start prosecuting people for

having a contrary opinion on these things. I think

when we get to the basis of gender and

this is becoming a very confusing topic

for a lot of people in our society, a lot

of your listeners, when suddenly they

can't even look at someone and refer to

them as 'he' or 'she' they have to have an

introductory conversation or (ask) "Which

pronoun would you prefer I use?" It's

becoming quite aggressive from the safe

spaces in places like Monash University

where I think your academic comes from.

You know that's the same university that

has trigger warnings now before their

lectures to say that there's all sorts

of things we're going to talk about here

that might shock, horrify or offend you

and we want to give you a trigger

warning - such as 'scopophobia'. We may

make eye contact with you and if that

triggers a response that causes you

trauma, we have to give you a warning

beforehand about

scopophobia. (Tomlinson: Fair enough, lot's changing

in the world I think.) A lot's

changing and I'm not sure it's all for the better Sarah.

for the better Sarah.

For more infomation >> Political correctness from the dark recesses of Melbourne universities - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

►Dark Souls 3 | Como CONSEGUIR ALMAS INFINITAS | [FUNCIONA] 2018 - Duration: 3:02.

For more infomation >> ►Dark Souls 3 | Como CONSEGUIR ALMAS INFINITAS | [FUNCIONA] 2018 - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

The Dark Origins of #Pedophile Rings in the US - Duration: 15:35.

Hello and welcome, I'm Gina Shakespeare

On this episode of Declassified, a researcher has reported

that soviets created child-trafficking rings in

the West for blackmail.

Rings that are believed to be still operating.

This story gives a background account of an alleged Soviet operation

to use children for honeypots in order to lure foreign governments

into committing serious crimes so they can be blackmailed.

We believe the account is credible enough to warrant telling and include additional

research to support it.

Just before we get underway, please feel free to

subscribe to our channel and hit the notification's button,

that way you won't miss out on any other upcoming episodes.

Let's get started.

A scholar on Soviet Russia has uncovered claims that former General Secretary Yuri Andropov

wanted to subvert the West by creating child trafficking

and pedophile networks to blackmail

business leaders and politicians.

Details on the program were uncovered by Jeffrey Nyquist

in his research on communist regimes

and their influence on the West.

His main source is the grandson of a former member of the Soviet Central Committee who

opposed the program and was possibly killed because of his opposition.

Two other sources of his were defectors from the Soviet Union who revealed information

on Soviet experiments on pedophilia and sexual perversion.

All three requested to have their identities withheld,

as they believe that this abuse continues,

and speaking on record would endanger their lives.

The Soviet leaders had begun planning the program in the late 1970s,

when Andropov was chairman of the KGB—the Soviet intelligence agency

that was set to run the operations.

Nyquist noted, however, that the program was controversial

even by the standards of the Soviet leaders.

His contact, who is currently living in the West, said his grandfather was part of a faction

within the Central Committee that opposed the program; yet the dissenters, including

his grandfather, were believed to have been killed for their opposition, and the program

was able to move forward.

Nyquist said"This grandfather told his family, 'Andropov is building networks for child

trafficking and pedophilia,

and this is a project the KGB has begun internationally, around the world,'"

The purpose of the program was to seduce politicians and business leaders, then control them as

agents through blackmail.

The grandfather understood what it meant to oppose Andropov.

According to Nyquist, he told his family that Andropov would kill him if the program prevailed,

and that if he died, his wife would need to flee with their children to another city;

and that if the KGB ever knocked on their door, they would again need to flee,

and to "never look back."

Nyquist said "And, of course, that is what happened.

The grandfather died under mysterious circumstances,"

"Whatever the struggle was within the central committee, he lost."

His family fled, as he requested.

Around the same time, two other eyewitness sources of Nyquist's say the Soviet Union

began conducting experiments in its Komsomol camps on how to grow sexual perversions.

The camps were for members of the communist Young Pioneers

and included children aged 10 to 15.

Nyquist interprets these Kosmosol events as connected to the Andropov plan

his source told him about.

According to Nyquist, the Soviets were organizing orgies in some of the camps, and say

"they were trying to locate perverts to recruit them."

Nyquist also said"The idea was that in these Komsomol camps they were looking for people

who had psychological problems that caused them to become sexually perverse in different ways,"

"It was like they were studying different perversions and the causes,

and how to cultivate that, how to extend it, what kind of things draw people toward blacker perversions."

The program the grandfather described was a classic honeytrap

a method of espionage to lure people into compromising sexual encounters for blackmail.

This program took it a step further, however, by using children as the bait.

It was a form of "false flag recruitment," according to Nyquist,

where the KGB agents likely did not reveal themselves as agents to their targets.

He noted that "if the KGB honeytraps somebody, they don't know who they're working for,

because the KGB officer may be somebody who speaks English without an accent who merely

references themselves as part of an organized crime group."

Accounts by child victims and police reports reveal shocking claims of sexual abuse,

dark occult practices, and the involvement of high-level officials.

After a person has been compromised in the honeytrap,

the agents or the front organization can continue offering

services to the target in exchange for work,

while also maintaining evidence to blackmail the targets if they have qualms about cooperating.

The tactic is still widely used, including by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The CCP was accused in 2015 of using attractive women to seduce spies from the British intelligence agency

and lure them into honeytraps to obtain state secrets.

A top-secret MI6 memo obtained by the UK's Mirror news outlet said the Chinese spies were

"aggressively" targeting spies and their families.

Honeytraps were also very common under the Soviet Union.

Former KGB General Oleg Kalugin explained it once, stating according to Foreign Policy that,

"In America, in the West, occasionally you ask your men to stand up for their country.

There's very little difference.

In Russia, we just ask our young women to lay down."

In conventional honeytraps, the target may be controlled either by a lover who is secretly a special agent,

or with evidence of an extramarital affair—something that in politics can ruin a career.

With pedophilia, however, the scandal and consequences are much more severe,

and the effects of the honeytrap are much more binding.

Nyquist referred to it as "the ultimate blackmail."

The timing of the Soviet child trafficking program corresponds with a sudden uptick of

pedophile rings uncovered in the West.

While it's likely similar forms of abuse had existed previously,

the new scandals aligned closely with what Nyquist's source warned of.

In the 1980s and into the '90s, shocking cases of pedophilia and extreme abuse

began to emerge in the United States, Australia, and Europe.

Many of the cases involved high-level officials.

Some were prosecuted, but many were thrown out due to lack of physical evidence and

child testimony not being recognized.

Among the most prominent cases was that of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted pedophile

accused of holding underage girls as sex slaves on his private Caribbean island.

He flew numerous top politicians and business leaders to the island on his private plane,

dubbed by news outlets as "The Lolita Express."

According to press reports, the plane has a bed that was used for sex with young girls.

According to the same reports, flight logs from Epstein's plane show that former President

Bill Clinton flew on The Lolita Express 26 times.

Numerous girls alleged they were sexually abused by Epstein, and Epstein was charged

by the Palm Beach police department.

Yet after a plea deal, he was sentenced in 2008 and served only 13 months in prison for

one charge of soliciting prostitution from a 14-year-old girl.

A 2006 court filing, cited by the New York Post, says that a police search of Epstein's mansion found

he wired it with hidden cameras to record his guests engaging in orgies with underage girls,

which he could use for blackmail.

Epstein was very well connected.

It has been reported that he kept contact numbers of figures including Tony Blair,

Naomi Campbell, Dustin Hoffman,

Michael Bloomberg, and Richard Branson, but no flight logs have

ever surfaced showing any of them ever flew to Epstein's island.

Many of his A-list contacts dropped him after his 2008 conviction.

Often overlooked in Epstein's case is that the father of his ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell

was deceased media tycoon Robert Maxwell,

whom Ghislaine accused of sexually abusing her.

Robert Maxwell may have also been a Soviet spy.

According to FBI files released in 2013, Maxwell, who was born in Czechoslovakia

and was living in the United Kingdom,

was believed to be using his Pergamon Press media empire in the

1950s to provide intelligence to the Soviet Union.

The heavily redacted reports noted that when Maxwell and his business partner Kurt Wallersteiner

were running their Anglo-Continental Exchange firm in London in 1953,

both had "allegedly been recruited by the Soviet intelligence service for espionage purposes."

Former FBI agent Marc Ruskin said in a previous interview that two agents from the Belgian

national police told him of a child abuse ring in Belgium in the mid-1990s

that also allegedly involved government officials.

Ruskin said, "they had been working on a case that involved political corruption,

and also there was a child pornography aspect to it as well,"

"And as their investigation proceeded, they began to develop subjects

targets of the investigation— who were high-level public officials."

As their investigations grew deeper, however, the agents were called into their supervisor's

office and told to drop the case.

Ruskin said, referring to political corruption of law enforcement, that

"this was Western Europe—not some undeveloped country with a dictator.

If it can happen in Western Europe, it can happen anywhere."

What Ruskin reported happened in Belgium, shocking claims of a pedophile ring servicing

high-level officials whose investigation was hushed up,

has happened elsewhere in the West.

Unfortunately, there is no single source tracking reports of pedophile rings,

and there is a pattern of mysterious events obstructing their investigation

when they are reported.

Starting in 1980, victims of pedophile networks that fit the picture outlined by the Soviets

began to step forward in the West, but a new element began to be commonly reported.

Accounts by child victims and police reports reveal shocking claims of sexual abuse,

dark occult practices, and the involvement of high-level officials.

This began the so-called Satanic panic, which lasted into the mid-90s.

It resulted in prison sentences for only a handful of perpetrators,

and also led to multiple claims of government-level conspiracies behind the rings.

Among the most famous cases was the Franklin child prostitution ring case from 1988 to 1990.

The case in Omaha, Nebraska, alleged that high-level politicians were involved in a

child prostitution ring,

where children were flown to private parties of politicians

where they were abused.

Victims alleged other crimes including cannibalism, human sacrifice, and drug trafficking.

The defendants were eventually found not guilty, but the way the case played out was criticized

as a cover-up.

The three main witnesses were instead charged with perjury, and many key figures in the

case would later turn up dead.

Documented problems with the case were later compiled by former state Sen. John DeCamp

in his book, "The Franklin Cover-up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska,"

where he states: "Two grand juries, one local and one federal, had a mandate to consider

these and other charges of child abuse connected with the Franklin Credit Union.

They indicted the victim-witnesses for perjury instead!"

DeCamp also states that evidence in the case "leads into drug-trafficking, money-laundering,

pornography, child prostitution, and the kidnapping and sale of children in different parts of

the United States, and abroad."

Award-winning author and filmmaker Tim Tate produced a documentary on the Omaha case,

uncovering many similar findings.

The Discovery Channel was set to broadcast the documentary "Conspiracy of Silence"

in May 1994, yet abruptly canceled before it could air.

Tate explains on his website the sensitivity with covering the topic of Satanic ritual abuse,

noting that in his experience, "touch it, and—professionally, at least—you die."

The full documentary, which was in the late stages of editing, was later published online.

In a case in the United Kingdom, former British Member of Parliament Geoffrey Dickens,

who died in 1995, investigated what he said, according to The Washington Post, was a pedophile ring

of powerful individuals with "big, big names."

Barry Dickens, the son of Geoffrey Dickens, told the BBC that "My father thought that

the dossier at the time was the most powerful thing that had ever been produced, with the

names that were involved and the power that they had."

His son provided the research to British authorities,

but files went missing in 2014 around evidence of break-ins.

An additional 114 documents on the alleged pedophile ring

also went missing around the same time.

The Guardian reported, "The revelation that further relevant documents have disappeared

will raise fresh fears of an establishment cover-up."

According to Nyquist, when rumors of high-level Satanic-themed pedophile rings again emerged in 2016,

his contact whose grandfather detailed the Soviet plot became nervous and afraid.

He said, "I have to tell you he became very frightened, last year,"

"I went to breach the subject with him again,

and he said 'absolutely I do not want to talk about this;

this scares me too much.'

Because he believed this is such a significant part of the Russian power,

these pedophile networks, that if you talk about it you might be dead."

Nyquist said his sources did not mention the element of Satanic abuse

in the alleged Soviet-backed pedophile rings,

but he noted that, as someone who has studied communist methods

of infiltration and subversion,

it doesn't seem unusual.

Nyquist said "When the communists design an attack,

they use such horrible methods; one of the advantages

of a horrible method is that nobody believes that anyone would do such a thing," he said.

The elements of forcing victims to commit ritual murder—

and killing any who refused to participate

—would also work as a control mechanism over anyone involved,

since they would all be guilty, he said.

He said the overall system, if true, would have given the Soviets and later post-Soviet

participants significant power in establishing networks of influence and control.

He noted that even just among business leaders, since they often fund politicians and political causes,

by blackmailing them "you're suddenly getting into the fringes of the political system.

You're able to penetrate the political system."

Nyquist said "Pedophilia, if you look at it, is an important tool for corrupting, controlling, and manipulating

a foreign government, and sabotaging its economy, sabotaging its political process, even sowing confusion,"

"This whole thing can be used in all kinds of creative ways to hurt the target country."

That's all the time we have for today

Thank you for watching and I'll see you soon.

For more infomation >> The Dark Origins of #Pedophile Rings in the US - Duration: 15:35.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 Scary Amazon Dark Secrets - Duration: 10:04.

Amazon are one of the biggest companies in the world, making billions of dollars in profits

every year.

Although theyve been a financial success story, the company has had a bit of a bumpy ride

along its almost 25 year long history.

Some things have been pretty shocking, Amazon has tried to pay their way out of them and

although money talks, sometimes people talk louder - these are their stories.

My name is Danny Burke, this is the Top 10 Scary Amazon Dark Secrets.

Starting off at number 10 we have Peeing In A Bottle.

For many years, there have been reports of Amazon treating its workers poorly and often

for less than minimum wage.

If that sounds unbelievable then listen to this: in December 2017, Metro reported that

after the Amazon delivery drivers have paid for the van hire and insurance, they are effectively

earning less than minimum wage.

The year before, the BBC reported that drivers also work illegal hours.

They said that Amazon expects the drivers to work 12 hour shifts, despite UK law prohibiting

drivers from working over 11 hours a day.

However, the most shocking part of all came when the undercover reporter said that colleagues

told him they had to -defecate in bags- and -urinate in bottles- because there was no

time for toilet breaks.

Workers said they lived in fear of being disciplined over idle time and losing their jobs because

they needed the toilet.

An Amazon spokesman said -Amazon ensures all of its associates have easy access to toilet

facilities which are just a short walk from where they are working- … still, many critics

were inclined to believe the workers who would have no reason to lie or hold in if theyre

bursting.

Next up at number 9 we have Illegal Items.

In December 2015, the Guardian shared their investigation which found that the British

Amazon site listed illegal weapons including stun guns, pepper spray pistols and knuckle

dusters.

Some of them were found to have been developed for military and police forces.

To the Guardians surprise, they were able to purchase the weapons.

These included a pistol that fires a jet of high strength pepper spray at 112 mph, a 1

million volt stun gun disguised as a flashlight and last but not least: a baseball cap containing

a hidden stabbing knuckleduster.

Im wearing a similar one right now.

Just kidding obviously, I left that at home today.

The sellers on Amazon were said to be from the US and Israel.

Naturally, many people were wondering how these items got through British customers.

Well, the packages had been declared as an -LED flashlight- and a -toy part- … thats

a little bit of a stretch isnt it.

I don't know how many toy parts that could kill you.

This report wasnt the first of its kind, it wont be the last, and its certainly put a

spotlight at just how difficult Amazon has made it to control the sale of illegal items

across borders.

Moving on to number 8 we have The Nazi T-Shirts.

In January 2008, a Czech website called attention to shirts sold on Amazon that bore the words

-I love Henrich Himmler- and -I love Reinhard Heydrich- … two infamous nazi officers and

convicted war criminals.

They are most remembered for being instrumental leaders of the holocaust which saw over 6

million people murdered at the hands of the Nazis.

Patricia Smith, a spokeswoman for Amazon, told the media -Our catalog contains millions

of items.

With such a large number, unexpected merchandise may get onto the web- … the scandal led

to the World Jewish Congress calling on the shirts removal from their site.

Amazon did just that and also removed -I love Hitler- shrits which were on sale for women

and children.

Who is buying that.

For children aswell.

So many questions.

Coming in at number 7 we have Tax Avoidance.

This is a pretty big one.

In 2012, it was reported that Amazon made 3.3 billion pounds in sales in the UK - thats

a lot of money and so youd expect a sizeable sum to be tax - but no, that year, Amazon

didnt pay any corporation tax on that amount.

After a lengthy investigation, Amazon agreed to pay the corporation tax.

So, lesson learnt right?

Well apparently not because in 2017, it was once again reported that Amazon had been avoiding

taxes.

This time it was even worse.

Despite making European revenues of 21.6 billion Euros, the company paid kist 16.5 million

Euros.

In the same year, its UK corporation tax bill halved despite revenues rising almost 50 percent.

A spokesperson said that Amazon -pays all the taxes that are required in every country

where it operates-

Next up at number 6 we have the Pedophile Guide.

In November 2010, an e-book was sold on Amazon titled -The Pedophiles Guide to Love and Pleasure:

a Child lovers Code of Conduct- … of course, many people were outraged.

There were threats of boycotting Amazon over its selling of the book.

Initially, Amazon defended their sale of the book, saying that they didnt believe in censoring

certain books simply because they or other others believe the message is objectionable.

However, as the pressure mounted, the company wavered.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Amazon defended the book, then removed it,

then reinstated it, before finally removing it again.

Even today, a debate still remains between those who believe that the book was not pornographic

or obscene and should not have been censored, and those who say that anything of this nature

simply serves to normalise child abuse.

Coming in at number 5 we have The Tents.

In December 2016, The Independent reported that Amazon workers in Scotland had resorted

to sleeping in tents near the companys warehouse in an attempt to save money.

At least 3 tents had been pitched in the woods near Dunfermline, close to one of Amazons

fulfilment centres.

The employees said they were living in tents in the sub zero temperatures to save money

on travel costs.

They said that if they didnt do this, they couldn't continue to work for the company,

which was not paying them a living wage.

Naturally, critics said Amazon should be ashamed of this and demanded the company raise workers

wages to enable them to commute from their homes.

During the week that the story broke, temperatures dropped to -7 degrees in the area, with locals

becoming concerned for the welfare of the workers camped out in the woods.

An Amazon spokesperson refuted the story, saying that the company pays a fair living

wage, enough to allow a commute to work.

Critics deny this, saying nobody would sleep in the woods in sub zero temperatures unless

they had to …

Moving on to number 4 we have Price Discrimination.

Many websites ask your permission to use cookies which track what sites you have recently visited.

They aim to build up an online profile of you to better market products or tailor your

experience.

Most of the time, this is fine for people - but when Amazon once used it in a very questionable

way.

One Amazon user found that a DVD on the site at once price, but when they deleted their

cookies they were offered the the DVD at a much lower price.

Thats right, Amazon gave them two very different prices when before and after deleting their

cookies.

This means that you and I could be given two different prices simply because of automated

information about our online history.

The scandal went right to the top.

CEO Jeff Bezos responded to the story by apologising for the pricing.

He said that Amazon will -never test prices based on customer demographics- … they offered

to refund customers who paid the higher prices but many people felt the cat was now out of

the bag.

Coming in at number 3 now we have The Reviews.

In 2004, the New York times reported that a glitch in the Amazon Canada website allowed

authors to write reviews for their own books or rival books written by other authors.

Of course, you can see why this would be a huge problem - kind of defeats the whole purpose

of a public review.

Amazon said they had fixed this problem but over the years, more reports kept coming in.

In April 2010, a British historian was found to have posted positive reviews of his own

books and negative reviews of his colleagues.

A few months later, a news blog found that 75 book reviews had been posted by a public

relations company on behalf of their clients.

Scandals like this only increased until in 2011, it got even worse.

It was reported that Amazon itself had moved into the publishing business and begun to

solicit positive reviews from established authors in exchange for increased promotion

of their own books and upcoming projects.

Basically, thats not cool.

The whole practice makes reviews kinda worthless - do you trust the ones you see online?

Next up at number 2 we have The Competition.

In October 2015, Amazon banned sales of Apple TV and Google Chromecast products that were

directly in competition with its own Fire TV product.

This was obviously done to create an advantage for their own product but Amazon denied it.

They said they only banned the sales to prevent -customer confusion- because at the time,

Apple and Googles devices did not support Amazons video service.

Critics werent buying it.

They argued that Amazon had deliberately refused to develop an app for the other devices as

it was trying to suppress their sales.

This seemed to be proven true when, in December 2017, Amazon launched an Amazon Video app,

but neither it or Chromecast products have returned to the site.

And finally at number 1 we have Holocaust Denial.

We spoke about the Holocaust earlier.

Some countries hold this piece of history in such high regard that it is illegal to

deny the Holocaust happened.

In October 2013, British magazine The Kernel reported that Amazon was selling books that

defend Holocaust denial and were even shipping them out to countries where holocaust denial

is illegal.

The World Jewish Congress called on Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos to remove the books that deny

the holocaust and promote anti semitism.

In a statement, they said -No one should profit from the sale of such vile and offensive hate

literature.

Many holocaust survivors are deeply offended by the fact that the worlds largest online

retailer is making money from selling such material- … by 2017, the group announced

that Amazon had complied with their requests.

Well what do you make of all those?

I know a lot of people defend Amazon and say that with a company of its size, its expected

that scandals will happen, but others feel that in this day and age, companies like Amazon

are so big that they have more power than people, cities or even some countries - and

stories like these make that quite worrying to hear.

What are your thoughts?

Let me know, thanks for watching as always guys, my name is Danny Burke and Ill see you

all in the next video!

For more infomation >> Top 10 Scary Amazon Dark Secrets - Duration: 10:04.

-------------------------------------------

How Are We Searching For Dark Matter? And How Do We Even Know It's Real? - Duration: 16:02.

Whenever I mention dark matter in anyway in the Guide to Space, or in a questions show,

I get a bunch of responses that have essentially the same point.

Astronomers are just speculating, why do they even think dark matter is a thing?

They're sure going to be embarrassed in the future when they realize they were wasting

all this time.

Oh, astronomers.

Foolish, gullible astronomers.

The reality, of course, is that many astronomers have dedicated their lives to the mystery

of dark matter.

More than a decade of school, working with incredibly complicated math, and then many

more years of observations, using some of the most powerful and sensitive instruments

ever designed by human beings.

And obviously I know that people can spend their lives dedicated to nonsense.

So in this video I want to do two things.

First, I'm going to spend some time explaining how astronomers realized that dark matter

is something real.

In fact, the evidence is overwhelming, and I'm going to get into it.

And then I'm going to talk about the fascinating work going on around the world to search for

dark matter.

What are the individual experiments, observatories and projects which are trying to chip away

at this mystery.

Before I go further into this dark matter.

I want to give you an analogy that comes from my Astronomy Cast co-host, Dr. Pamela Gay.

Because I don't think that most people really understand the state of the search for dark

matter.

Let's imagine you're driving your car and it starts to make a knocking sound.

You take it into the mechanic and they can't figure out what's causing it.

They ask you to drive some more in different conditions and maybe you can help located

the problem.

You realize that it only makes the sound when you're going up a hill and turning left.

You bring back this new information to the mechanic and this gives them a better place

to search for the source of the problem.

If some friend ridiculed you because of your "dark knocking sound", all they'd have

to do is spend a little time in your car and they'd hear the sound too.

The problem is definitely there, it's just that you and the mechanic haven't figured

out what's causing it yet.

But you will, oh… you will.

You have a mystery, and you haven't solved it yet.

That's dark matter.

And dark energy is an stranger mystery, but that's a topic for another video.

I think the name "dark matter" is probably the source of the confusion.

It should have been called something like invisible matter, or mystery matter, or crazy

gravity, or… something.

Okay, back to dark matter, and let's start with a brief history.

I'd like to thank Dr. Brian Koberlein for his comprehensive history of dark matter on

his blog.

I'll put a link in the shownotes so you can learn more about it.

The effect of dark matter was first discovered by the astronomers Fritz Zwicky, who was studying

the motion of galaxies in the Coma Cluster.

Located about 321 million light-years from Earth, this cluster contains more than 1,000

separate galaxies.

During his study of the cluster in 1933, Zwicky calculated that the motion of all the galaxies

was too fast for the gravitational interactions of the galaxies themselves.

There had to be some kind of missing mass that was contributing to their movement.

Of course, it's possible that the individual galaxies happened to be flying past each other,

but the same result was found in all the galaxy clusters that astronomers could locate.

The next key piece of evidence came with the way that galaxies themselves rotate.

Think about the way that planets orbit the Sun.

Each planet goes at a different speed depending on its distance from the Sun.

Mercury completes an orbit every 88 days, while Earth takes 365 days and Pluto takes

248 years.

You would expect the stars within a galaxy to do the same thing.

Stars close to the center of the galaxy whip around quickly, while the ones in the outskirts

take their time.

Through her pioneering work of measuring the rotation rates of individual stars in distant

galaxies, Vera Rubin figured out that spiral galaxies rotated like disks.

All the stars moved the same speed around the galactic center.

One idea, of course, was that there was some kind of hidden matter, like the dark nebula

we can see here in the Milky Way.

These block the light from a more distant object, hiding it from our point of view.

But astronomers developed techniques to measure the radio signals coming from these dark clouds

of matter, and the amounts in galaxies didn't account for the amount of mass it would take

to make galaxies and galaxy clusters behave the way they do.

Astronomers were left with two possibilities.

Either their understanding of gravity at the largest scales was wrong.

This idea was known as Modified Newtonian Dynamics, or MOND.

As long as you were willing to put in new equations for gravity, you could predict the

kind of motions observed in nature.

The other idea was that there was some kind of invisible particle.

A particle that accounts for the vast majority of the mass in the Universe, but it doesn't

interact with regular matter in any way we can detect, apart from gravity.

These were known as Weakly Interacting Massive Particles.

In order to better map out the dark matter in the Universe, astronomers used a technique

called gravitational lensing.

This is where the gravity from a foreground object, like a galaxy cluster, distorts the

light from a more distant object, like another galaxy cluster.

Astronomers have done incredibly comprehensive surveys of the sky, and mapped out where the

blobs of dark matter are, and how they surround galaxy clusters.

One famous example of this is the Bullet Cluster, where astronomers could observe clusters of

galaxies colliding with each other.

They could see the stars in the galaxies, they could measure the locations of giant

clouds of hot gas colliding because of the X-rays they emit, and they could measure the

dark matter through its gravitational lensing.

And what they found was amazing.

The stars are so far apart, they just pass by one another without colliding.

The gas does collide, and bunched up into regions that glowed bright in X-rays.

But surprisingly, the dark matter didn't collide with anything, not with the gas, stars

or even itself.

If dark matter is a particle, it must be tiny - astronomers say it has a small cross section.

And yet, it has to be massive, since it dominates the area with its gravity.

Better observations across the large scale structure of the Universe show how dark matter

must have been necessary to get these galaxy clusters collapsing in the ways they do, and

the gravitational lensing observations are now so precise, they can see the exact distributions

that match these predictions.

Another survey of dark matter was to search for it in the Cosmic Microwave Background

Radiation, of course.

This is the afterglow from the Big Bang.

A time when the Universe was about 380,000 years old, and light was finally able to escape

into space.

The European Space Agency's Planck satellite performed an all sky survey of this cosmic

microwave background, mapping out the distribution of dark matter compared to regular matter

in the sky.

When you look at the CMB, the temperature fluctuations tell you how much regular matter

and energy there is compared to dark matter.

When that early Universe was so hot and dense, the radiation pushed against regular matter,

while it didn't push against the dark matter.

Astronomers have built models with different ratios of dark matter to regular matter, to

match up the one they see in the CMB.

Based on this survey, astronomers were able to calculate that the Universe is made of

4.9% regular matter and 26.8% dark matter.

Oh, and another 68.3% dark energy, but again, that'll have to be another episode.

Astronomers are certain that dark matter is there, but they still don't know what it

is.

As my friend Dr. Ethan Siegel says, "When someone puts forth the hypothesis that dark

matter doesn't exist, the onus is on them to answer the implicit question, okay then,

what replaces General Relativity as your theory of gravity to explain the entire Universe?"

What's your general theory of sound that replaces my idea that my car is making a strange

knocking noise?

Now, I hope, I've convinced you that astronomers aren't arrogant, they've got a genuine

mystery they're trying to chase down through observation and experiment.

And I'll get to them in a second, but first I'd like to thank:

Hadi Zolfaghaari Dany Noacco

Gaute Moon Incrediwebbs

Joseph Matheny Bruce Jividen

And the rest of our 837 patrons for their generous support.

If you love what we're doing and want to get in on the action, head over to patreon.com/universetoday.

In the last few decades, astronomers have continued to search for dark matter.

Narrowing down what it might be: invisible particles or gravity behaving strangely at

large distances.

When it comes to particles, there are three possibilities: hot, warm and cold.

In this case, hot dark matter would be a particle that's moving close to the speed of light,

while cold would indicate that it's moving very slowly.

An example of hot particles are neutrinos.

These are the nearly massless particles streaming from the Sun and other stars.

At any point you've got about 100 trillion of these tiny particles passing through your

body, moving at nearly the speed of light.

They rarely interact with anything out there in the Universe.

In fact, a neutrino will, on average, be able to fly through a light-year's worth of lead

without getting stopped.

Physicists detect neutrinos in enormous underground reservoirs of water surrounded by incredibly

sensitive detectors.

When the occasional neutrino does interact with a molecule of water, it releases a cascade

of particles which can be detected.

That sounds like a good candidate for hot dark matter, right?

Well, the problem is that neutrinos are moving close to the speed of light.

This means that won't ever clump up in the way that astronomers observe dark matter doing,

through gravitational lensing and the cosmic microwave background radiation.

Since dark matter doesn't seem to clump at all, hot, fast moving particles are ruled

out.

Sorry neutrinos.

Instead, slower moving, cold dark matter particles seem like the most likely culprit.

There are literally dozens of experiments searching for cold dark matter particles right

now.

They're all based on the idea that even if dark matter barely interacts with matter,

it can happen from time to time and you can observe it.

Experiments are running to detect every possible particle theorized.

Let me give you just one example: the Super Cryogenic Dark Matter Search, or SuperCDMS.

The experiment is located 700 meters underground in an old mine in Minnesota.

Assuming that dark matter is this cold, slow moving particle that comprises the vast majority

of matter in the Universe, and assuming that it doesn't really interact with regular

matter, you'd expect many of these particles to be passing through any spot on the Earth

at all times.

Every now and then, one of these dark matter particles would interact with regular matter

and release a cascade of particles that could be detected.

This old mine is deep underground, shielded away from cosmic rays and human pollution,

so only particles that can pass through hundreds of meters of rock will be detected.

It gives scientists a clean signal.

The detector is equipped with silicon and germanium crystals cooled down just above

absolute zero.

This is going to sound totally new age, so bear with me.

If dark matter particles pass through the detectors, they'll set off vibrations in

the crystals that will be detectable.

An even more sensitive version is under construction at a deeper facility in Sudbury, Canada.

Once it's fully operational in the 2020s, SuperCDMS SNOLAB will be able to detect cold

dark matter particles with a mass between 1 and 10 protons.

Another way scientists are searching for dark matter is using particle accelerators, like

the Large Hadron Collider.

Instead of waiting for dark matter particles to drift into their detectors, they've tried

to create them.

Particle accelerators work by pushing particles to immense speeds, creating an enormous amount

of kinetic energy.

When the particles are slammed into each other, that kinetic energy freezes out into matter,

which can then be studied.

Different models for dark matter have been proposed, and the right combination of energy

and particle collisions could generate a particle that matches the properties of dark matter.

Another experiment at CERN is called OSQAR, or the Optical Search for QED Vacuum Bifringence,

Axions and Photon Regeneration.

It's searching for particles known as axions, which could be a candidate for dark matter.

It involves firing a laser down a vacuum chamber which is exposed to an incredibly powerful

magnetic field.

As the photons travel down this chamber, some of them could turn into axions.

At the end of the chamber there's a barrier.

The visible light is blocked by the barrier, but the axions should be able to pass through

this wall and then turn into photons on the other side again.

At this point, there's no concrete evidence for axions, but there are several experiments

searching for them.

A much longer vacuum chamber is in the works, and there's a counterpart to OSQAR called

the CERN Axion Solar Telescope, which is looking for axions coming from the Sun.

There's a detector on board the International Space Station called the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

which could be the one to discover dark matter.

In its first 5 years of operation, the instrument detected over 90 billion cosmic ray events:

protons and other particles moving at close to the speed of light.

These particles contain vastly higher energy than anything that could be produced in the

Large Hadron Collider, so they're like a natural particle accelerator.

One indication for dark matter could be the hundreds of thousands of particles of antimatter

which have already been detected by the AMS.

The source of this antimatter is still a mystery, but one idea is that it's a side effect

from particles of dark matter occasionally colliding with itself.

Perhaps the most epic particle detector is the IceCube neutrino lab, located in Antarctica.

This giant telescope is a series of detectors embedded into a glacier - it's one cubic

kilometer of ice.

When neutrinos and other particles pass through a vast volume of water, they can occasionally

interact and release a cascade of particles.

IceCube has been one of the most important instruments for physicists, setting limits

on the mass of particles that dark matter could be.

At this point, scientists still don't know what dark matter is.

But with dozens of experiments, they're continuing to search, and better narrowing

down what it can't be.

At some point in the future, we can look back at this search with a definitive answer.

I really enjoy a mystery, and being a journalist gives me a chance to watch the search for

dark matter unfold, day after day, as ideas are tested, falsified, rejected, and replaced.

This is science.

This is how it works, and the journey is as important as the destination.

What do you think?

Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Once a week I gather up all my space news into a single email newsletter and send it

out.

It's got pictures, brief highlights about the story, and links so you can find out more.

Go to universetoday.com/newsletter to sign up.

All of my videos are also available in handy audio and video podcast formats so you can

have our latest episodes show up right on your audio device.

Go to universetoday.com/audio or universetoday.com/video to get the one you want.

And I'll put the links in the shownotes.

And finally, here's a playlist.

For more infomation >> How Are We Searching For Dark Matter? And How Do We Even Know It's Real? - Duration: 16:02.

-------------------------------------------

In the Dark for 29 Years About Real Father (Full Episode) | Paternity Court - Duration: 16:38.

You may be seated.

Hello, Your Honor.

Hello.

This is the case of Bronson v. Roberts.

Thank you, Jerome. Good day, everyone.

AUDIENCE: Good day.

Ms. Bronson, you have always known the defendant

to be your biological father,

but have opened your case against him to prove paternity

because he now claims he has reason to deny he is your father.

Is that correct?

Yes, Your Honor.

Mr. Roberts, you believed Ms. Bronson was your firstborn

until three years ago

when your world was turned upside down

with the news that you may not be her biological father,

and Mr. Banks claims he is.

Is that correct?

Yes, Your Honor.

JUDGE LAKE: So, Ms. Bronson, how do you feel,

knowing your father is denying paternity?

Your Honor, I feel Mr. Roberts is my father.

He's the only father I've known for 29 years.

That's my father. Period.

I've known him my whole life.

He the only one I call my father.

That's who I grew up knowing as my father.

So, Mr. Roberts is my biological father. That's it.

JUDGE LAKE: And Mr. Roberts...

ROBERTS: Yes, Your Honor.

JUDGE LAKE: What is your side of this?

Well, I always, um, believed that Jammy was my daughter.

I raised her as my daughter,

as the other children in my life.

She only knows me as her father.

I never even knew anything about this gentleman here.

JUDGE LAKE: So, 29 years.

BRONSON: Yes, Your Honor.

ROBERTS: Yes.

He's been through everything with you.

Yes.

Mr. Roberts, did you take financial responsibility for Ms. Bronson?

Did you provide for her in the form of support?

Yes, Your Honor.

The times I was there, and I was also ordered to do child support.

JUDGE LAKE: Are you on her birth certificate?

ROBERTS: No, Your Honor, I'm not on her birth certificate.

JUDGE LAKE: So, Ms. Bronson, all your life,

this is the man that you were told was your father,

you believed was your father, and you had no reason to doubt it?

Yes, Your Honor. Up until 2009.

What happened in 2009?

I had a phone conversation with my mother

and she mentioned Mr. Banks.

And she said, "Don't you remember the guy

"that I told you, who thought he was your father?"

When she said that to me, Your Honor,

it was a "What?" moment, like, "What are you talking about?"

So, she said that he wanted to get in contact with me.

I think I gave her my number to give to him

or she gave me his number.

I can't remember how we actually got in contact.

And then, I... We reached out to one another.

JUDGE LAKE: Did you know Mr. Banks?

No, Your Honor.

You didn't know who he was?

No, Your Honor.

So, all of a sudden, a man named Mr. Banks comes into the picture,

and this man could be your father.

Yes, Your Honor.

Did you say anything to Mr. Roberts?

Because, at the time, you believed he was your biological father.

No, Your Honor, I didn't say anything to Mr. Roberts.

I kept it to myself for a while.

And then I told Ms. Blair.

Mr. Roberts, Ms. Blair is your... Fiance.

ROBERTS: Fiance.

Yes.

JUDGE LAKE: What did you say to Ms. Blair?

BRONSON: I just mentioned that my mother told me

that someone else could be my father.

But you said it to Ms. Blair, and not to Mr. Roberts.

BRONSON: Right.

What made you make that choice?

Me and Ms. Blair built a good relationship.

So, I felt that I could confide in her about that.

She was the only person that I trusted to tell that at that time.

So, Mr. Roberts, take me to the day you found this out.

A few years ago, Ms. Blair told me

that she needed to talk to me about something.

And that's when I found out.

I was kept in the dark about all of this.

I never knew anything about Mr. Banks.

I also, um, you know, spent eight months in jail

for unpaid child support.

And I'm $75,000 in arrears.

(AUDIENCE EXCLAIMS)

JUDGE LAKE: And then you get...

You don't even get a call, your fiance comes to you and says...

There's a possibility that Jasmine is not my biological daughter.

And that took me for a loop.

After all these years, I was like... I mean, I had to pause for a minute.

I mean, I was like, "What? What?

"What are you telling me, that she may not be my daughter?"

I was not expecting to hear that.

And it really shook me.

After all these years, I...

My thing is, if the mother knew or Mr. Banks knew or somebody,

why didn't somebody say something?

I was the last to know about everything.

And if other people knew, they should've said something.

We could've dealt with this issue 20 years ago.

(AUDIENCE MURMURING)

Mr. Banks, I want to ask you, when did you become aware

that you potentially could be Ms. Bronson's biological father?

I can recall when she was about six or seven,

and I ran into her mother,

and Jasmine and her sister in a park.

And there, she had told me that Jasmine was my daughter, then.

Oh! So, Jasmine's mother said...

Yes.

Do you remember the words she used?

Uh, no, I don't.

Uh, I just recall her saying,

that Jasmine was my daughter.

JUDGE LAKE: And Jasmine was there, too.

Yes.

And when you looked at this child, did you say to yourself,

"Wow, this could really be my child,"

or... Did you believe her?

I believed it, and I said that she probably can be

'cause of the resemblance of my family members

at that age that she was.

JUDGE LAKE: Mr. Roberts, how old was Ms. Bronson when you found out

you potentially could not be her biological father?

ROBERTS: I do believe, Your Honor, she was 19?

That's not accurate, Your Honor.

JUDGE LAKE: What is your testimony, Ms. Bronson?

When I first found out in 2009, I was 20 going on 21.

You had no idea about this?

No, my mother said the same story

that Mr. Banks said when I went to the park and I met him. But as a...

JUDGE LAKE: So, she had seen him when you were seven,

now you're 20, 21 years old.

BRONSON: Yes.

So that is 13 years from the day you all had this encounter.

And do you remember the encounter in the park?

No, Your Honor, 'cause as a little girl in the park with my sister,

the last thing I think about is meeting some man.

JUDGE LAKE: Absolutely.

And you don't remember there being some outward gesture, Mr. Banks,

am I correct?

Correct.

It was just, "There's Jasmine, and she over there playing."

What kids do.

Right.

"That could be your daughter."

Right.

But, then for 13 years, the secret persisted.

Well, I thought I was gonna see her again,

but, uh, I'd never see the mother again.

Did you exchange numbers?

Did you say, "Hey, let's keep in touch"?

Yes, we did.

Did you ever call her?

Basically, she took my number,

and actually, I've never heard from her since though.

JUDGE LAKE: Did you think about that day for years?

Yes, I always thought that she was my daughter after the mother told me

'cause I even took her upstairs to meet my mother.

Oh, wait, so on this day when you all met at the park,

then you took Jasmine, Ms. Bronson, upstairs, to see your mother?

BANKS: Yes, 'cause she did live upstairs.

And you went upstairs and you said, "Mom..."

"I've just found out that Jasmine is my daughter."

And your mother said...

What she said was, she could be a possibility,

'cause she resembled my sister when she was young a little bit.

(AUDIENCE EXCLAIMING)

And you don't remember that either, Ms. Bronson.

BRONSON: No, Your Honor, I don't remember that at all.

And so, Mr. Banks, did you know Mr. Roberts existed?

And that he had been paying child support,

and going to jail and fighting through

all of this responsibility?

No, I didn't.

You were never told that there was another man?

Well, she did tell me

that the man that she had married

did think that he was the father at the time.

So, Mr. Roberts, up until this point,

you didn't even know Mr. Banks existed.

ROBERTS: No, Your Honor.

You knew nothing.

ROBERTS: I knew nothing of Mr. Banks.

I dated Ms. Bronson,

I even married her two months after Jasmine was born

and I went on my business just raising, as to starting my family.

But, possibly, if I had known that earlier,

it probably wouldn't have been the rest of my daughters.

Because if she'd had told me that earlier

that another man is the father,

I would've discontinued that relationship.

(AUDIENCE EXCLAIMING)

And I look at it like this. It's being young.

I would've been like, "Wow, I dodged a bullet."

But, I did the best

and I took responsibility, but I still...

My whole issue is, somebody should have said something.

I'm the last one to know everything.

And it just blows my mind

people could just keep that

without letting people know.

She has a right on her end to know

who her bloodline comes from.

Whether it's from my side or Mr. Banks' side,

she needed to know.

And it shouldn't have took 29 years for this to happen.

(AUDIENCE APPLAUDING)

(AUDIENCE APPLAUDING)

When you hear Mr. Banks

talk about this encounter in the park

and taking Jasmine up to see his mother, you...

This is all new to you?

ROBERTS: No, I never heard of it.

I did hear that, I think he picked her up for Thanksgiving one time,

or something like that.

JUDGE LAKE: Is that true, Mr. Banks?

BANKS: Yes.

And did you ever say, "Why is he picking her up for Thanksgiving?"

Yeah, and then they told me that he may be the father.

But I never met him.

Ain't nobody told me he was outside...

When was this?

BRONSON: It was 2011.

I don't know the dates, because nobody told me nothing.

It was 2011.

JUDGE LAKE: It was 2011?

Yes.

I don't know dates, 'cause nobody ain't told me nothing.

Like, a lot of stuff was kept from me.

We get it. You're piecing it together.

You're just piecing it together.

ROBERTS: Yeah.

As best as I can.

JUDGE LAKE: Ms. Bronson?

So, you met Mr. Banks.

You went to his home

for Thanksgiving in 2011, that's true?

Yes, Your Honor. I went to his mother's house.

JUDGE LAKE: You went to his mother's house?

Yes.

So, after you did that,

how long did it take for you to inform

the man you believe was your biological father

that, "I had had this encounter with Mr. Banks"?

BRONSON: I didn't tell Mr. Roberts that happened.

You didn't tell him at all?

No. At the time,

I didn't feel comfortable to tell him.

I don't want to be the one to come and tell somebody

that you're not my father. That's not my job.

So, I didn't do it.

But, you told Ms. Blair.

Yes, 'cause she was the person I always confided in.

To this day, she is the person I confide in to.

And so, instead of going to the man who you believe was your father

and trying to break this news,

you knew that, "This was not my burden to carry."

It's not my burden, and I wouldn't want to tell him that anyway.

How can a daughter tell their father, "You might not be my father"?

BRONSON: I can't do that.

And now you're hurting because you want to prove today

that he is your biological father

because that's the only father you've ever really known.

He's the only father I've known. Twenty-nine years.

That's my father.

JUDGE LAKE: And so, when you told Ms. Blair after that,

what did you say, in your mind, was your next course of action?

"Do I just wait?"

Was she supposed to relay the information to Mr. Roberts?

How do you get to the point

where Mr. Roberts finally knows?

I didn't really think about that.

I was still registering it myself.

It's still a lot to deal with to this day.

That's something that's on your mind every day.

When somebody tell you that somebody else is your father,

when you already don't know your identity, that jacks you up more.

So, I'm glad she told him 'cause I couldn't do it.

JUDGE LAKE: Yes. And I think it's very real when you say,

when someone says something to you like this, you think about it every day.

I don't think I've heard it ever stated that...

That real, and that true.

Mm-hmm.

Every single day.

You're sitting around with him, laughing, joking, and stuff,

it will cross your mind.

Yeah, 'cause we've been on vacations, birthdays,

you know, we... She came down,

Marilyn let me, lived with us for eight years.

And now, you know, she got her first apartment,

which, we live in the same complex.

I live there, she living around the corner.

So, we still in each other's lives.

Her children, her friends, my grandkid,

they're at my house right now.

So, we see each other every day.

I take 'em to school, her children.

I take 'em from school, to spend at mine.

We're still involved in each other's lives to this day.

But, we're here to find out

if I'm her biological father, or Mr. Banks.

And I need to know as well,

because it's been a long time.

I still can't get over that they kept this from me.

Like, somebody should've said something.

JUDGE LAKE: Mr. Banks, hearing this testimony,

do you still feel that it's a very real possibility

that Ms. Bronson is your biological daughter?

Well, the only thing I can really go off is what the mother told me.

And, like I said, the resemblance,

if I had have known she was my daughter, uh...

I would've been a part of her life

if I would have known where she was at.

And Jasmine, honey, do you feel like

Mr. Banks should have done more?

Yes, I do.

If you see me at seven,

and you felt that I look like your family...

You could have did something.

It wasn't on me,

my mother handled it how she handled it,

that's on her, I ain't got nothing to do with it.

But, as a father,

you should wanna, if that's your child,

be in your child's life.

They could've did something.

I wouldn't be standing here if that was done.

I probably wouldn't feel the way I feel if that was done.

We help babies,

two months old, two weeks old.

We help babies before they're even born

determine who their fathers are.

But we can never forget that there are adult people

in this world

that live with it. I say a lot of times,

when we deal with our cases with babies, I say,

they have the benefit of never having to remember

that this was an issue, because we're able to get it solved

before they ever know.

And then there are young women,

beautiful young women like yourself...

Thank you.

...and you still have to function with this.

Right. Every day.

Right?

BRONSON: Yes.

Every day.

That's why we're here, is to get you these results.

And I want to get them for you right now.

Jerome.

(AUDIENCE APPLAUDING)

These results were prepared by DNA Diagnostics

and they read as follows.

In the case of Bronson v. Roberts...

When it comes to 29-year-old Jasmine Bronson,

it has been determined by this court,

Mr. Roberts, you...

Are not the father.

(AUDIENCE EXCLAIMING)

(ROBERTS SNIFFLES)

You're still my daughter. I love you.

You're always gonna be my daughter.

BRONSON: I love you too.

(AUDIENCE APPLAUDING)

Can I hug her?

JUDGE LAKE: Absolutely.

The next result reads as follows.

In the case of Bronson v. Roberts,

it has been determined by this court,

Mr. Banks...

You are the father.

(AUDIENCE EXCLAIMING)

JUDGE LAKE: Do you want to be a part of her life?

BANKS: Yes, I do.

Because I love you.

And I always will love you, as I told you before.

Now, if I can walk down these stairs

to give you a hug, if I may.

Will you allow that?

BRONSON: That's fine.

(AUDIENCE APPLAUDING)

JUDGE LAKE: I think there's one benefit in this.

Both of these men believed you were their daughter.

And both of these men wanted to get the truth.

And both of these men want to be in your life

from here on out.

So, look at all you have.

And even though she's a grown woman now,

you all have the responsibility

to help heal that child in her.

You do.

Right?

'Cause as people that love her,

you've got to stand by her

as she begins to work through this. Okay?

Yes.

You're such a beautiful young woman,

and I wish you the very best of luck.

Thank you.

And I'm so happy we could get you the answers you needed today

and give you all this closure.

BRONSON: Thank you.

All right?

I wish you the very best of luck. Court is adjourned.

(AUDIENCE APPLAUDING)

For more infomation >> In the Dark for 29 Years About Real Father (Full Episode) | Paternity Court - Duration: 16:38.

-------------------------------------------

Terminator 2: Judgement Day - Dark Machine - Duration: 4:09.

He exists in a world

Beyond

Your world

What we only fantasize

He does

He lives

A life where

Nothing is

Beyond him

Nothing is

Beyond him

For all his

Charm and charisma

His wild and expensive toys

He a Driven

Unflinching

Calculating

Machine

He exists

In a world

Beyond

Your world

He lives

A life where

Nothing Is

Beyond him

He exists

In a world

Beyond

Your world

He lives

A life where

Nothing Is

Beyond him

He a Driven

Unflinching

Calculating

Machine

He takes

What he wants

When he wants

Nothing is

Beyond him