Thứ Hai, 4 tháng 6, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Jun 4 2018

Who was Tom Longboat?

- Need to Know about Canadian Distance Runner.

Thomas Charles Longboat was a distance runner.

Largely because of his ability to dominate any race and his spectacular finishing sprints,

Longboat was one of the most celebrated pre-WWI athletes.

He won the Hamilton "Around-the-Bay" in 1906, the Boston Marathon in 1907, the Toronto Ward's

Marathon in years 1906 to 1908, the "World's Professional Marathon Championship" in 1909,

and broke numerous records.

He was one of the most sought-after performers in the brief from 1908 to 1912, revival of

professional racing that followed the controversial 1908 London Olympics marathon, in which Longboat

and Dorando Pietri collapsed.

Longboat's desire to train himself led to several well-publicized conflicts with managers.

Despite constant and sometimes racist criticism, he stuck to his own methods.

He bought up his contract in 1911 and ran better than ever.

In 1912, he set a professional record of 1:18:10 for 15 miles, 7 mins faster than his amateur

record.

Longboat raced successfully during WWI while serving as a dispatch runner in France.

After the war he lived and worked in Toronto until 1944, when he retired to the Six Nations

Reserve.

His birth was on this day in 1887 and He died on January 9, 1949.

For more infomation >> Who was Tom Longboat? Need to Know about Canadian Distance Runner Thomas Charles Longboat. - Duration: 1:36.

-------------------------------------------

'The Past Is Calling' Ep. 8 Teaser | Westworld | Season 2 - Duration: 1:22.

♪ (SOFT PIANO MUSIC PLAYS) ♪

-(HORSE SNORTS) -(HOOVES SHUFFLING)

♪ (MUSIC INTENSIFIES, STOPS) ♪

AKECHETA: (SPEAKING LAKOTA)

♪ (TENSE MUSIC PLAYS) ♪

AKECHETA:

(VULTURE SCREECHES)

AKECHETA:

♪ (MUSIC CONTINUES) ♪

♪ (MUSIC STOPS) ♪

(HEARTBEAT PULSING)

(HEARTBEAT PULSING)

For more infomation >> 'The Past Is Calling' Ep. 8 Teaser | Westworld | Season 2 - Duration: 1:22.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Thunderbird Was Real? - Duration: 4:59.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey.

The Thunderbird is a popular figure in the mythology of tribes indigenous to North America.

Specific beliefs vary, but the idea of a bird bringing with it rain, thunder, and lightning

is very popular.

Most people nowadays believe it to just be a legend, but what if it was real?

What if there was a thunderbird flying around to this day?

Let's explore.

If you want more What If videos, check out our "Biggest What Ifs" playlist on the

channel.

Now get ready, it's time to ask the question: What if the Thunderbird was Real?

Specific beliefs about the Thunderbird vary a great deal from tribe to tribe, but it is

generally believed to be an enormous bird that causes thunder with the flapping of its

wings.

How big is this bird?

Well, according to some tribes, it's large enough to lift a killer whale from the water

like an eagle would carry a fish.

So, yeah, it's kind of a big deal.

Many iterations of the Thunderbird see it as a god-like creature, and while most believe

it brings thunder with it, other tales say that it is accompanied by lightning as well.

Some believed that it brought with it storms that would allow crops to grow, and plants

to bloom.

It's relatively easy to follow the logic that started this belief.

Thunder has long been assumed to be related to the gods or powerful beings.

And thunderstorms tend to become more prevalent at the beginning of Spring, when things begin

to bloom, crops grow, and animals return.

It makes sense that one would assume this great unexplained noise would be bringing

about the changes that come with Spring.

This is an example of the Post Hoc fallacy, where you assume that since something happens

after another thing, it must have happened because of the other thing.

But I digress.

Let's step away from the origins of the belief, and explore a world in which this

legend was actually true.

Believe it or not, this idea of a bird flying around changing the weather is not a first

for LBQ.

We previously did a video on the Pokemon Lugia, who brought about great winds as it flapped

its wings.

However, in Lugia's case, it would have caused significantly more destruction, and

it also had a home deep in the ocean.

So a world with a thunderbird could be rather different.

For one, the way we experience thunderstorms might change.

This would largely depend on one big question: Would ALL thunder and lightning be caused

by the thunderbird, or would the thunderbird simply cause additional thunder and lightning?

If the latter, then not much would change.

The vast majority of thunder and lightning we saw would be due to a natural phenomenon,

just like it is now.

So for the purposes of making a more interesting video, we'll assume this isn't the case.

So, if ALL thunder and lightning was caused by the Thunderbird, this would change the

way the world views the phenomena a great deal.

Every thunderstorm would have people rushing to their windows, hoping to catch a glimpse

of the Thunderbird, maybe even rushing outside to snap a sweet photo.

It would basically be like playing Pokemon Snap, with everyone trying to get the thunderbird

in the centre of the frame, doing a cool pose.

This would also change weather around the world a great deal, since there could only

be thunder occurring in one place at a time.

This would make these storms much less frequent, and would further exacerbate the scrambling

to get a good photo of the thunderbird, since you wouldn't know when your next chance

would be.

This would cause storms to be at once more predictable, and less predictable.

They would be more predictable because you could just follow the flight of the Thunderbird

to know where storms would hit.

However, the Thunderbird would probably change direction somewhat more than clouds, so you

might expect a storm to hit one place, but it will suddenly end up somewhere else entirely.

Of course, it should be noted that all this is assuming rain could still occur without

the thunderbird.

If rain also depended on the creature, this would have huge effects on the world, and

could result in drought if the bird didn't fly around evenly.

Human history would be greatly affected, especially if the Thunderbird had favourite areas to

visit.

Those places would become far wetter, with swamps and pools forming where none may have

been.

At the same time, areas avoided by the thunderbird would become very dry, with deserts forming

and new species migrating to or from them.

This would greatly affect the way human and animal populations were distributed, with

much greater density near bodies of fresh water.

In modern times, it's possible that we would attempt to work around this in a few ways.

For one, it's possible that we would attempt to draw the Thunderbird to places that needed

water.

If we found a way to attract it to certain areas, we could map out a path for it to follow

that would fit our needs.

It's also possible that this would spur on scientific development in the movement

of water, and drawing it from larger bodies to be used.

Transportation and procurement of water would be prioritized, in hopes of dealing with the

potential lack of rain.

Both these methods would be effective at getting water to populated areas experiencing drought,

but could also be very useful in changing certain environments to be more suitable for

life.

And now we return to our question: What if the Thunderbird was Real?

Well, if all thunder and lightning was caused by this bird flying around, it would change

the way we saw thunderstorms.

They would become a time of great glee, with people clamoring to snap a great photo of

the thing.

Storms would become less common, as they would simply follow in the wake of this great bird,

and could occur in just one place at once.

Furthermore, if rain also depended on the Thunderbird, ecosystems around the world would

change depending on its preferences.

This would change the distribution of animals around the world, and would lead to various

strategies made to acquire water, both through manipulation of the bird, and through scientific

means.

Thank you for watching Life's Biggest Questions, I hope this was interesting and informative,

and maybe even inspired you to look into it further on your own.

If you liked this video, please thumbs up and subscribe to the channel down below.

While you're down there, let me know what you would do if you could ride a Thunderbird.

Until next time, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey with Life's Biggest Questions, wishing you

the best of luck, on your quest for answers.

Doing their job Another important point to make is that the

effects of the Thunderbird would largely depend on its temperament.

If it was peaceful and benevolent to humans, as it was depicted in most indigenous stories,

then there's a good deal we could learn from it.

Not only would it be an incredible sight, it would be a scientific marvel to see a giant

bird that could create thunder with its wings.

We might even attempt to clone it, and create more thunderbirds.

This sounds dangerous, but with the way genetic science is going, it doesn't seem too far

off that we'd be able to rewrite the genes to slightly modify these thunderbirds to be

less destructive.

We could potentially create huge, domesticated birds that we could fly around.

Which, needless to say, would be freaking awesome, albeit rather unlikely.

On the other hand, however, if the Thunderbird wasn't quite so nice, it could be rather

destructive.

If it flew around cities, launching lightning this way and that, it would likely be hunted

to prevent further damage.

Unfortunately, given its huge size and impressive speed, catching it would be no small feat.

This would bring about a difficult decision: Do we try to kill the Thunderbird, and thus

remove thunder and lightning forever, not to mention killing a legendary creature?

Or do we allow it to survive, and accept the destruction caused when it flies through a

populated area?

This would be a difficult question, however it's possible that it would be moot, since

the Thunderbird could well be immortal, given its divine origin in some tales.

For more infomation >> What If The Thunderbird Was Real? - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

Chris Wallace:"Comparing what was said by ROSEANNE and Samanta BEE - Duration: 11:31.

For more infomation >> Chris Wallace:"Comparing what was said by ROSEANNE and Samanta BEE - Duration: 11:31.

-------------------------------------------

Mischa Barton is opening up about what it's like to be a victim of a revenge porn crime. - Duration: 4:41.

Mischa Barton is opening up about what it's like to be a victim of a revenge porn crime

Last March, the "O.C." star and her attorney, Lisa Bloom, held a press conference and revealed that she had been filmed by an ex-boyfriend during private moments without her knowledge or consent, and the footage was being shopped after their split

In a new interview with Broadly's "The Scarlet Letter Reports," the 32-year-old actress remembers feeling "afraid" when she learned what was going on

"I was afraid. I was a lot of things. It was a mixture of emotions," she recalls while chatting with host Amanda Knox

"I'm sure a lot of women who go through anything similar, feel the same kind of mixture of rage and fear and uncertainty

" Mischa Barton Says She Had a 'Complete Hallucination' When She Was Filmed Yelling at Neighbors "I think that's what most predators are banking on," she continues

"That you'll have that shame inside and that you won't fight back. And to be honest, your head is spinning and you don't know what to do

But at the end of the day, I was raised much stronger than that." In court documents from 2017, Barton accused Jon Zacharias of secretly filming her in intimate moments -- including having sex and being naked in the shower -- without her consent while they were together

She claimed that after their split, he attempted to sell the footage.  Mischa Barton Confirms She's the Victim of Revenge Porn Crime: 'No Woman Should Have to Go Through This' Barton knew immediately that she would need to take the case to court, because if "he had done it before, he could do it again

" "And also I had no choice. He was now trying to sell it for money," Barton, who won the case in June 2017, says

"He put a half-million dollar price tag on it." Of Zacharias' character and how she felt when she discovered he had secretly been taping her, Barton says, "I felt like he was safe

I didn't know forever until one of his friends came to me and said, 'You should be careful about him

'" Mischa Barton Thanks Fans for Support After Hospitalization: 'It Means the World to Me' "I'd already started to sense around this time that there was a problem," she adds

"And then he started bragging about it to the wrong people who came to me. But then there was still no specific proof and you'd just hope it would disappear

Finally, it broke in the press. I woke up one day to my friend downstairs and she was like, 'Wake up

You have to get up because this is all over the press. And apparently all these porn sites are looking to buy it

' And I was, as you can imagine, completely devastated." Looking back on speaking out about being a victim for the first time, Barton says she was "of course" afraid to stand up for herself, especially because it was before the #MeToo and Time's Up movements began

"It was extremely taboo," she says. "I had no idea what revenge porn was -- that was completely foreign to me

I think we're lucky to be living in a time now, finally, when we can bring the discussion of feminism back up and women's empowerment

There's strength in the discussion." During her press conference last March, Barton said her "absolute worst fear was realized" when she learned that Zacharias had been secretly filming her without her knowledge

"I came forward to fight this, not only for myself, but for all the women out there," she said at the time

"I want to protect them from the pain and humiliation that I have had to go through

" "No woman should have to go through this," she continued. "It is a very hard thing to do, but I am glad that I am finally standing up for myself

"

For more infomation >> Mischa Barton is opening up about what it's like to be a victim of a revenge porn crime. - Duration: 4:41.

-------------------------------------------

What was actually said between Monfils and Goffin during heated French Open exchange - Duration: 3:49.

Football News24/7 World number 37 Gael Monfils has explained away his apparent spat with Belgian David Goffin during their third-round match at the French Open yesterday

Tempers frayed at the end of the fourth set as the two took their seats next to the umpire during the change-over

Cameras caught the pair exchanging frank words in French after Monfils was apparently reprimanded by the umpire for taking too long to settle and serve between points

In his second-round match against the Slovakian Martin Klizan, Monfils had been warned for being too hasty between points, and the Frenchman undoubtedly felt that there was some inconsistency from the umpires in applying rules regarding timing between points

The entertaining, but sometimes volatile, Monfils perhaps felt he had a point to prove

Explaining that his frustration was with the officials rather than his opponent, Monfils said after the match: "When we changed side, I said that I took my time because the judge had told me yesterday I take too little time

"And then, today, he was telling me I take too much time. And so, the way I recover is different

I always have injuries, so I like to rest on my knees, so I can recover. "But what bothered me is that if I'm told to go faster, I go faster, and then I'm told to go slower

"And David told me, I'm sorry. I didn't know that. But as I told the umpire, I'm friends with David

So, I had nothing against David". Monfils' frustration is understandable and his outspoken reaction could renew calls for time violation rules to be shored up and consistently enforced

Goffin did not let the heated conversation affect his temperament, and the eighth seed went on to clinch an impressive 6-7, 6-3, 4-6, 7-5, 6-3 victory over his French rival

He will face Italian Marco Cecchinato in the round of 16 and is favourite to progress into the next round

Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE: https://www

givemesport.com/writeforgms

For more infomation >> What was actually said between Monfils and Goffin during heated French Open exchange - Duration: 3:49.

-------------------------------------------

What Fabinho was up to when Brazil were playing at Anfield - Daily News - Duration: 2:51.

</form>Liverpool newboy Fabinho passed up the opportunity to get used to his new surroundings and watch his compatriots in action on Sunday

Utility star Fabinho completed his £45million move from Monaco last month, becoming the second new addition to Jurgen Klopp's side this summer - with Naby Keita also brought in

Despite his big money move, Fabinho was left out of Tite's Brazil squad for the World Cup later this month - which meant he wasn't in contention to make his Anfield debut in Sunday's friendly against Croatia

Brazil won the friendly 2-0, thanks to goals from the Neymar, who was making his first appearance in three months, and Fabinho's future teammate Roberto Firmino

Read More Liverpool sign Fabinho But instead of checking out the Kop and his new dressing rooms, Fabinho was taking a trip of a lifetime half way around the world

Fabinho's imminent arrival as a Liverpool player was documented on Instagram by his wife Rebeca Tavares, who proudly proclaimed " we are Reds, baby! " as the pair flew into Merseyside on a private jet

Fresh from signing what was described as a "long-term contract" at Anfield, Fabinho was jetting off once more, enjoying some time off before officially linking up with his new team-mates on July 1

Read More Transfer latest Again, it was his wife documenting the action as Liverpool's latest midfield dynamo took a trip to New York

Fabinho and Rebeca took a boat trip around Ellis Island to visit the Statue of Liberty, with the day out being uploaded to her Instagram story

The Brazilian even added '#ynwa' to one of their videos as they journeyed to the world famous monument

Read More Nabil Fekir's agent finally confirms Liverpool want French star - but deal not close yet After signing for the club earlier this week, Fabinho took to his own Istagram account to reveal his delight at joining Jurgen Klopp's side

He said: "Another dream comes true! "Very happy for joining this huge club and for having the people I love next to me in this very special moment

"Thanks to my [representatives] for making this possible. God is faithful!" poll loading Will Fabinho be a good signing for Liverpool? 20000+ VOTES SO FAR YES NO

For more infomation >> What Fabinho was up to when Brazil were playing at Anfield - Daily News - Duration: 2:51.

-------------------------------------------

'What were you thinking?' Interviewer who asked S. Williams if she was intimidated - Duration: 3:28.

'What were you thinking?' Interviewer who asked Serena Williams if she was intimidated by Maria Sharapova's 'supermodel looks' is forced to apologise after social media backlash

A sports journalist has been forced to apologise after asking Serena Williams if she was intimidated by rival Maria Sharapovas good looks ahead of their showdown on Monday.

Bill Simons, of Inside Tennis magazine, was branded sexist after calling the US athlete baby and suggesting she was intimidated by her opponents alluring shoulders.

The cringeworthy interview, which took place on Saturday, sparked a storm on social media as fans objected to Simons terrible line of questioning.

And on Sunday he took to Twitter to apologise, writing: I apologize if my awkward ques seemed 2 empower Trump or attack Serena/ I SO admire her/ Ive spent [my] lifetime fighting racism/ sexism/ homophobia.

Started campaign to name US Open Stad 4 Ashe/ Lobbied long 2 get Serena 2 return to I.

Wells/ Called out police violence vs Blake/ Im so sorry (sic.).

The interview, which has been branded absurd by tennis fans, took a bizarre turn when Simons suggested that Williams, 36, must be keen to get home to her baby daughter, saying: Work with me here, please.

Were in this together, baby..

He then quizzed her on a theory about her feelings towards long-term rival Sharapova, posited by Donald Trump 14 years ago.

Simons said: After the 2004 Wimbledon match with Maria, I had the opportunity to interview Donald Trump on his [Los Angeles] golf course, and he said that Marias shoulders were incredibly alluring.

And then he came up with this extraordinary analysis: That you were intimidated by her supermodel good looks.

My question is: Have you ever been intimidated by anyone on a tennis court, and what are your thoughts about the occurrence?.

A clearly unimpressed Williams replied: I honestly dont have any thoughts about that.

I cant say I have been intimidated by anyone.

Thats all. Thats it..

For more infomation >> 'What were you thinking?' Interviewer who asked S. Williams if she was intimidated - Duration: 3:28.

-------------------------------------------

Why do Serena Williams and Sharapova 'HATE' each other? What was said in explosive book? - Duration: 7:51.

Why do Serena Williams and Sharapova 'HATE' each other? What was said in explosive book?

Both Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova breezed through into the French Open fourth round.

Sharapova, who won the French Open in 2012 and 2014, eased past Karolina Pliskova 6-2 6-1 in less than an hour.

Williams, meanwhile, overcame Julia Goerges 6-3 6-4 to move into the second week.

Now the arch rivals go head-to-head today.

Why do Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova not get on?

The rivalry began back in 2004.

Sharapova, just 17 at the time, was coming up against Serena in the Wimbledon final.

Williams was the two-time defending champion but Sharapova put in a stunning performance to win the trophy.

By the Russians own admission, thats where the seeds were sown to a spicy future.

She admitted just that in her book, released last year, called Unstopptable: My Life So Far.

I think Serena hated me for being the skinny kid who beat her, against all odds, at Wimbledon, she wrote.

I think she hated me for seeing her at her lowest moment.

But mostly I think she hated me for hearing her cry.

Shes never forgiven me for it..

In fact, her book mentioned Williams dozens of times and Sharapova described hearing her opponent sob in the locker room.

How did Serena Williams react to Maria Sharapovas comments?

Williams hadnever spoken publicly about it but she did just that ahead of their French Open clash.

I wanted to read the book and I was really excited for it to come out and I was really happy for her, Serena began.

And then the book was a lot about me.

I was surprised about that, to be honest.

You know, I was, like, Oh, okay.

I didnt expect to be reading a book about me, that wasnt necessarily true.

I was, like, this is really interesting, but, you know, I dont know.

I think maybe -- I dont know.

I think maybe she -- I didnt know she looked up to me that much or was so involved in my career.

I think the book was 100% hearsay, which was a little bit disappointing.

I have cried in the locker room many times after a loss, and thats what I have seen a lot of people do.

I think its normal.

I think if anything, it shows the passion and the desire and, you know, the will that you have to want to go out there and do the best.

I think what happens there should definitely maybe stay there and not necessarily talk about it in a not-so-positive way in a book.

I dont have any negative feelings towards her, which again, was a little disappointing to see in that hearsay book.

A lot of people always assume that I feel a different way and its not true.

Especially having a daughter - I feel like negativity is taught.

If anything, I feel like we should encourage each other, and the success of one female should be the inspiration to another, and I have said that a thousand times..

What else has Maria Sharapova said?

In an interview with CNN in 2017, Sharapova spoke publicly about Serena again.

Discussing the Wimbledon win, her first Grand Slam title, the Russian said: Obviously it was a disappointing loss to her because she was expected to win.

Im sure she expected to win that match, another Wimbledon final.

So I think that disappointment really, it stirred something up.

She didnt want to lose to me again..

Sharapova may have been right.

The pair have met 18 times since and Williams has won every one of those matches.

In fact Sharapova has taken just three sets off Williams since 2004, and none in their last seven matches since 2013.

What are the pundits saying?

Annabel Croft knows the womens game like the back of her hand and she admits the pair just dont really like each other.

She said: It seems like its not often in the womens game we look forward to a heavyweight clash.

We so often look torwards to them in the mens game but I think the womens tour has lacked some of those real clashes.

I think its not just due to the tennis and the kind of rivalry - and there is that doubt whether it is a true rivalry because of the weight of results for Serena in the head-to-heads over thet last 14 years - but its also because of the characters.

They just dont really like each other.

That adds that extra spice..

For more infomation >> Why do Serena Williams and Sharapova 'HATE' each other? What was said in explosive book? - Duration: 7:51.

-------------------------------------------

What is the minimum age for making a will - Duration: 3:42.

Hello, Adrian Corbould, Accredited Specialist - Wills and Estates, Turnbull Hill Lawyers. Today's question is what is the minimum age

someone can make a will?

Section 5 of the Succession Act states that a

minor

who makes a will, that

will is invalid. So what does that mean?

Anyone who makes a will and their age is less than 18, that will is not legal. Therefore

It can't be used to

administer someone's estate. So that means that the majority of persons under 18

their estate is dealt with under the laws of intestacy.

Intestacy is the law that

states that

in order of preference

assets are left to one's spouse; If there's no spouse,

it goes equally to one's children equally; If there's no children, then it goes equally to one's parents.

The majority of persons under 18 don't have a spouse and don't have children,

so in the majority of instances their assets are divided equally between their parents.

There is an exception to that rule about minors, in that a

minor can make a valid will if it's in contemplation of marriage,

but that will is not valid unless that marriage actually occurs.

Also a minor

who is married can make a will,

though that brings in the added difficulty of

how two persons under 18

get married. Well, the minimum age to get married is 16, and you generally have to

convince a court

why you

want to get married before they issue a marriage certificate, and that involves establishing

the degree of commitment together,

maturity, and several other factors.

So in the majority of instances someone under 18,

they cannot make a valid will, and if they decease before the age of 18, their estate is

subject to the laws of intestacy, and the majority of instances it goes to both parents equally.

Section 16 of the Succession Act, however, states that a court can authorise a will for someone under 18,

for a minor, though these are very isolated

instances, but they still still happen.

They're instances where

It may not be in a child's interest that their estate go equally to their two parents.

One parent may have had nothing to do with raising them, whereas the other parent did, and it would be

prejudicial to the parent who did raise them that if half their assets went to the other

parent. So this could be an instance where there is someone under 18 who actually does have a lot of

funds, they could have been subject to

a

personal injury claim, where they received a lump sum

in the millions of dollars, and it would be prejudicial to the parent that raised them if it went to the other parent.

Always lots of different circumstances - all have to be taken on their own merits.

So the thing to take away from this is - have to be over 18,

and if they are under 18, have to be married or in contemplation of marriage, or

get a court authorised will -

very difficult - definitely need lawyer's advice about that.

Thank you.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét