Thứ Hai, 30 tháng 7, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Jul 30 2018

Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan says there's no agreement to return a U.S.

pastor held in Turkey since October 2016. Last week, the

Washington Post reported that an apparent deal between the U.S.

and Turkey had fallen apart after a Turkish court ordered

Pastor Andrew Brunson put under house arrest instead of returned

to the U.S. But Erdogan says no such deal was made. Instead, the

Turkish president told broadcaster TRT the two

countries had talked, but only suggested the U.S. could help by

getting Israel to release a Turkish prisoner. On Thursday,

after it was reported Turkey wouldn't be returning Brunson,

President Donald Trump suggested on Twitter that he was willing

to impose sanctions on Turkey. Erdogan says the U.S. risked

losing a "strong and sincere partner."

For more infomation >> Erdogan: deal for U.S. pastor never existed - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Trump Makes MAJOR Move To Protect US Citizens – Media Refusing To Report - Duration: 13:13.

BREAKING: Trump Makes MAJOR Move To Protect US Citizens – Media Refusing To Report

The mainstream media is a sick shell of what they once were.

It seems like they have little to no regard for anyone not agreeing with them.

Fox News is reporting that President Trump has cut the number of refugees coming into

our country in HALF.

Statistics show that when Obama was in office, we let 25,000 refugees right in our front

door, no questions asked.

Now, the vetting process IS working.

Up until this point, the countries where the most refugees have come from have been Syria,

Iraq, Somalia, Myanmar, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Two of these countries also happen to be a part of Trump's (now infamous) travel ban.

The travel ban was signed into law via an executive order shortly after Trump's inauguration.

The order put a temporary ban on refugee admissions from specific countries like Iraq and Syria.

As you can imagine, the left went wild.

There were protests in the streets, people were obstructing airports — how pathetic.

Liberals are claiming that by enacting this travel ban, Trump is causing problems for

travelers around the world, and promoting "racist" behavior.

If the left were SO worried about how people were going to travel, they wouldn't be harassing

the airlines, and causing people to miss their flights!

Eventually, the travel ban was shot down by the 9th Circuit Court, but Trump persisted

with his America-first initiative.

He sent the legislation straight to the Supreme Court — maybe, finally, this issue will

find resolution.

It looks like the number of refugees entering our country each month is set to drop drastically

over the next several years.

It's crucial for us to keep refugee numbers under control.

In March, Trump asked the Secretary of State to deliver a full report on the long-term

operating costs of the United States Refugee Admissions Program at the federal, state,

and local levels.

The president, during his campaign, told us he was going to start focusing on AMERICA

again.

So far, we're beyond pleased.

We NEED this kind of motivation in our country.

We needed this to get some of the patriots up out of their ruts after a devastating eight

years under President Obama.

You have to admire Trump for his vision for the future, and the way it all seems to be

coming together — despite the left trying to throw a wrench in the gears every step

of the way.

Together, the patriots of this country can overcome ANYTHING they try to throw at us.

We'll see a sharp drop in our refugee numbers, and our country is going to come alive like

never before.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Trump Makes MAJOR Move To Protect US Citizens – Media Refusing To Report - Duration: 13:13.

-------------------------------------------

Iran's currency plunges to record low as US sanctions loom | News - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> Iran's currency plunges to record low as US sanctions loom | News - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

N. Korea, U.S. likely to look for common ground on denuclearization, security guarantee - Duration: 1:59.

Last week's repatriation of U.S. soldiers remains from the Korean War has helped rekindle

some momentum into North Korea-U.S. relations that seemed to have stalled in recent weeks.

It's hoped that the two sides can now make more progress towards North Korea's denuclearization,

as well as talks over security guarantees that Pyongyang wants from Washington.

Our Oh Jung-hee has this report.

Now that North Korea has returned more of the remains of American soldiers who died

in the Korean War... attention falls on how Pyongyang and Washington will proceed with

denuclearization talks.

Though Friday's repatriation is not directly relevant to Pyongyang's denuclearization,...

it's widely seen that the move did help both sides build trust... and therefore, could

have a positive effect on their denuclearization dialogue.

Since the June 12th summit in Singapore, North Korea and the U.S. have had difficulty moving

forward on the denuclearization front.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Pyongyang for the third time... but could

not meet Kim Jong-un... and after his visit, the North claimed Washington was making unilateral

demands about denuclearization and inspections.

Pyongyang began dismantling key facilities at its Sohae Satellite Launching Station -- believed

to have been the regime's key ICBM test site -- but at the same time, pressed Washington

and Seoul to declare a formal end to the Korean War.

From here on, it's expected that North Korea and the U.S. will focus on finding a middle

ground between the U.S. giving the regime a security guarantee through measures like

ending the Korean War... and Pyongyang taking steps to denuclearize.

This week, the foreign ministers of the two Koreas, the U.S., and China will all be attending

the ASEAN Regional Forum in Singapore.

Their meetings, bilateral or otherwise, could help add momentum to the Pyongyang-Washington

denuclearization talks.

Oh Jung-hee, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> N. Korea, U.S. likely to look for common ground on denuclearization, security guarantee - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

Man walks United States perimeter to raise money for homeless vets - Duration: 3:21.

For more infomation >> Man walks United States perimeter to raise money for homeless vets - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. prohibits use of term 'CVID' in negotiations with N. Korea: Asahi - Duration: 0:49.

The Trump administration reportedly ordered its officials to not use the expression "complete,

verifiable, irreversible denuclearization" in negotiations with North Korea.

Quoting U.S. government officials,....

Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun reported on Sunday that the order came early this month...

and said, it was meant not to pressure North Korea.

Before the June 12th summit in Singapore...., Washington had used the term "CVID" many times...

but the joint statement mentioned only "complete denuclearization."

Since then, key officials from Washington have used the term FFVD instead... which means

"final, fully verified denuclearization."

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has explained that the meaning of FFVD is not weaker than

CVID... and that the U.S. goal of North Korea's denuclearization has not changed.

For more infomation >> U.S. prohibits use of term 'CVID' in negotiations with N. Korea: Asahi - Duration: 0:49.

-------------------------------------------

There's Literally Nowhere In The US Where You Can Escape Corporate Pollution - Duration: 3:02.

We all know that if you're in a big city, if you're in a New York or a Chicago, or an

L.A. or a place like that, you're going to be confronted with a lot of ozone pollution,

most of which is coming from massive corporations or factories or refineries or power plants

near the cities.

Well we all think that we can get away from that, right?

We can escape, we can go to the mountains, we can go to a national forest, get away from

all this pollution and breathe some clean air.

Well, according to newly published scientific papers, you can't do that.

In fact, there is literally nowhere in the mainland United States where you can go to

get away from corporate pollution.

According to newly published scientific studies, the pollution in national parks here in the

United States has now gotten just as bad as in the big cities.

So whether you're sitting right next to an oil refinery or sitting in the middle of Joshua

Tree Forest, you're going to basically be breathing the same amount of pollution.

That should terrify the hell out of everybody here in the United States.

Here are the list of places that have recently been studied to contain almost as much pollution

as a major city that deals with traffic and factories and everything.

Acadia, the Grand Canyon, the Great Smoky Mountains, Joshua Tree, Sequoia, Kings Canyon,

and Yosemite.

All of those places are now just as polluted as a major city.

You can't go anywhere in this country anymore and actually breathe clean air.

You can't breathe fresh air.

It is all polluted because of the activities of corporations and the everyday activities

of human beings.

Driving our cars.

If you're not driving an electric, yeah, it contributes to these bad air days.

Now the report does say a little bit of good news because between well basically 1990 to

2016, air quality in the United States has improved by 31%.

Unfortunately, that study cut off in 2016, and studies have shown us that in 2017, for

the first time in decades, air quality in the United States got worse and emissions

actually rose instead of falling.

Things are getting worse under this administration.

And if it's already so bad to the point where you can't go to a national park that's 100,

200, 300 miles away from civilization and not breathe in corporate pollution, how much

worse can it get?

That's a terrifying prospect, and unfortunately, due to the leadership we have right now in

this country, it's a prospect that pretty soon, we're all going to be facing as a reality.

For more infomation >> There's Literally Nowhere In The US Where You Can Escape Corporate Pollution - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Boom! U S District Attorney Announcement…Will Pursue TREASON Charges Against OBAMA! - Duration: 10:49.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Boom! U S District Attorney Announcement…Will Pursue TREASON Charges Against OBAMA! - Duration: 10:49.

-------------------------------------------

US diplomats may have held talks with Taliban - Duration: 0:42.

U.S. diplomats reportedly held face-to-face talks with Taliban

representatives in Qatar. That's according to two Taliban

officials who spoke to The New York Times on Saturday. This

round of talks was meant to kick-start peace negotiations

between the Taliban and the Afghan government. But that's a

pretty big shift from the U.S.' past policies that said the

Taliban should negotiate directly with Afghanistan. As

Newsy previously reported, the Taliban really only wants to

talk with the U.S., who they see as occupiers. The State

Department wouldn't confirm that the talks happened, but the

Times pointed out that it didn't deny them either. Earlier this

month, the Trump administration told its top diplomats to seek

out direct communications with the Taliban.

For more infomation >> US diplomats may have held talks with Taliban - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

Why U.S. lawmakers failed to act on climate change decades ago - Duration: 5:42.

>> Sreenivasan: THIS COMING

WEEK, THE "NEW YORK TIMES," IN

PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PULITZER

CENTER, WILL PUBLISH "LOSING

EARTH"; A SINGLE THEMED ISSUE OF

ITS SUNDAY MAGAZINE.

THE TOPIC IS CLIMATE CHANGE AND

THE SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES AND

DECISIONS MADE IN THE DECADE

BETWEEN 1979 AND 1989.

WRITER-AT-LARGE NATHANIEL RICH

CENTERS HIS STORY ON TWO MEN:

RAFE POMERANCE, AN ENVIRONMENTAL

ACTIVIST; AND FORMER NASA

SCIENTIST JAMES HANSEN, ONE OF

THE FIRST TO WARN THE WORLD

ABOUT GREENHOUSE GASES AND

GLOBAL WARMING.

>> IT DIDN'T HAVE TO BE THIS

WAY.

IN THE DECADE 1979 TO '89, WE

KNEW ALREADY THE EARTH REALLY

WAS GETTING WARMER.

>> IT IS A NONSTATISTICAL.

WE SHOULD HAVE BEGUN TO TAKE

THE ACTIONS THAT WOULD HAVE

AVOIDED A TRAGEDY.

>> Sreenivasan: AUTHOR

NATHANIEL RICH RICH JOINS US NOW

FROM NEW ORLEANS.

FIRST TELL US, HOW CLOSE DID WE

COME?

HOW DIFFERENT WAS THE CLIMATE

FOR CLIMATE CONVERSATIONS?

>> IT WAS REMARKABLY DIFFERENT

AND IN MANY WAYS AND REMARKABLY

THE SAME, BY 1979, THERE WAS A

STRONG CONSENSUS WITHIN THE

SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY ABOUT THE

NATURE OF THE PROBLEM, THE

FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCE HASN'T

REALLY EVOLVED SINCE THEN, IT

HAS ONLY BEEN REFINED, REALLY.

THERE WAS NO POLITICIZATION OF

THE ISSUE THROUGHOUT THE DECADE

A NUMBER OF PROMINENT

REPUBLICANS WHO WERE LEADING THE

CHARGE TO INSIST ON A MAJOR

CLIMATE POLICY, AND INDUSTRY,

WHICH WE NOW BLAME FOR MUCH OF

OUR PARALYSIS HAD NOT TURNED

AGAINST SCIENCE OR TRUTH AND IF

ANYTHING, ESPECIALLY IN THE

EARLY PART OF THE DECADE WAS

ENGAGED IN TRYING TO UNDERSTAND

THE PROBLEM AND DETERMINE

SOLUTIONS, AND SO OVER THE

COURSE OF THE DECADE THE ISSUE

ROSE TO MAJOR NATIONAL ATTENTION

AND A PROCESS FOR GLOBAL TREATY

WAS IN HAND AND WE FAILED AT THE

END OF THAT TO SIGN AN

ABIDING AGREEMENT.

>> Sreenivasan: SO WHY DID WE

FAIL?

WHAT WAS IT THAT CREATED THAT

PARALYSIS THAT WE ARE SO

FAMILIAR WITH TODAY?

>> WELL, THERE IS A SORT OF A

SIMPLE POLITICAL ANSWER, VERY

NARROW ANSWER, I SUPPOSE, YOU

COULD MAKE WHICH IS THAT IN THE

BUSH ADMINISTRATION, THE FIRST

GEORGE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, HIS

CHIEF OF STAFF FORMER GOVERNOR

OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JOHN SUNUNU WHO

WAS AN ENGINEER, PH.D., WAS VERY

SKEPTICAL ABOUT THE SCIENCE OF

GLOBAL WARMING, AND HE SUSPECTED

THAT IT WAS BEING USED BY KIND

OF A CABAL OF FOLKS WHO WANTED

TO SUPPRESS GROWTH AND ECONOMIC

ADVANCEMENT AND ALL OF THAT, AND

HE MANAGED TO WIN AN INTERNAL

FIGHT WITHIN THAT WHITE HOUSE

AGAINST ACTION.

THAT IS KIND OF THE MOST LIMITED

POSSIBLE ANSWER, AND THE PIECE

TELLS THE STORY OF THAT

POLITICAL CONVERSATION.

I THINK THE LARGER -- THE LARGER

ANSWER HAS TO DO WITH HOW WE AS

A SPECIES TRY TO RECKON WITH

VAST TECHNOLOGICAL PROBLEMS THAT

WILL ONLY AFFECT FOLKS DECADES

OR GENERATIONS FROM NOW, OF

COURSE THAT IS NOT THE CASE

ANYMORE, BUT IN THE EARLY

'80s THAT WAS HOW THE

CONVERSATION WAS BEING

CONSTRUCTED.

AND SO I THINK THERE IS A KIND

OF LARGER CONVERSATION TO BE

HAD ABOUT WHY WE WERE SO UNABLE

TO TACKLE THIS WHEN WE HAD A

GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO AND

THEN THERE IS THE MORE NARROW

CONVERSATION ABOUT THE INSIDE

POLITICS OF THE MATTER.

>> Sreenivasan: YOU WRITE AT ONE

POINT THAT THE AMERICAN

PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, IN THE LATE

'50s AND '60s, THEY WERE

CONDUCTING THEIR OWN RESEARCH

AND COMING TO THE SAME

CONCLUSIONS THAT THE SCIENTISTS

WERE AND YOU ALSO POINT OUT THAT

EVEN THE C.I.A. IN 1974 HAD

WRITTEN A REPORT LOOKING AT

CLIMATE CHANGE BASICALLY AS A

NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT OR A

GLOBAL SECURITY THREAT.

>> BY THE MID-'50s, YOU HAD TOP

GOVERNMENT SCIENTISTS SPEAKING

ABOUT THE ISSUE, YOU HAD

MAJOR ARTICLES IN "LIFE"

MAGAZINE AND "TIME," SO IT

WASN'T JUST INDUSTRY THAT WAS

FOLLOWING IT, IT WAS AT THE

HIGHEST LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT,

LYNDON JOHNSON SENT A SPECIAL

MESSAGE TO CONGRESS IN 1965 THAT

DISCUSSED THE PROBLEM.

SO THE IDEA THAT WE HAVE ONLY

UNDERSTOOD IT IN RECENT YEARS IS

ONE OF THE WORST EXAMPLES WE

HAVE OF THE CULTURAL AMNESIA OF

THIS COUNTRY AND ESPECIALLY

AROUND THIS ISSUE.

>> Sreenivasan: ONE OF THE

MEETINGS YOU DESCRIBE IN GREAT

DETAIL STARTS TO GET TO THE SAME

CHALLENGES THAT WE HAVE, YOU

SEE PEOPLE TRYING TO WATER

DOWN LANGUAGE, NOT WANTING TO

MAKE A DECISION TODAY, LEAVE THE

DECISION FOR OTHERS.

>> THERE IS STILL A BASIC

DISCOMFORT WITH TRYING TO

PROPOSE A DRASTIC TRANSFORMATION

OR IMMEDIATE TRANSFORMATION OF

THE -- OF OUR WHOLE ENERGY

ECONOMY WHICH IS TO SAY OUR

ECONOMY, SO EVEN FOLKS WHO AGREE

ON EVERY ASPECT OF THE ISSUE,

THE SCIENCE AND THE POLITICS

STILL WE ARE NOT ABLE TO

NEGOTIATE EVEN THE MOST BASIC

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND I THINK

THAT WE STILL SEE THAT PROBLEM

TODAY, FRANKLY.

>> Sreenivasan: AUTHOR

NATHANIEL RICH WRITING FOR "THE

NEW YORK TIMES" MAGAZINE, THANKS

FOR JOINING US.

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

>> Sreenivasan: THE REPORT IS

CALLED "LOSING EARTH", IT WILL

BE PUBLISHED ONLINE LATER THIS

WEEK AND IN THE MAGAZINE NEXT

WEEKEND.

For more infomation >> Why U.S. lawmakers failed to act on climate change decades ago - Duration: 5:42.

-------------------------------------------

KIMBERLY STRASSEL U.S. AND EUROPE CAIL TRADE TRUCE - Duration: 20:15.

I'm thrilled to announce that in the second quarter of this year the United

States economy grew at the amazing rate of 4.1% if economic growth continues at

this pace the United States economy will double in size more than ten years

faster than it would have under either President Bush or President Obama

welcome to the journal editorial report I'm Paul Gigot that was President Trump

taking a victory lap Friday on news that the US economy grew at a robust rate of

4.1% in the second quarter the fastest pace in almost four years here with a

look at what's behind that acceleration is Kevin Hassett

who's chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers Kevin great to see

you thanks for coming in thanks Paul so 4.1% some people had predicted the

economists particular 4.4 but as you look at the details of the report what

do you like in it well I think that it goes back to a piece I wrote for the

journal a while back that the corporate tax cuts were going to create a capital

spending boom and that capital spending boom was gonna take growth we predicted

last fall this year up to 3.1 percent well if you look at the average over the

first half of the year we've got a capital spending boom and the average

growth is 3.1 percent you know it's not often that economists can nail it that

tightly and it's actually really true that the models are working exactly as

we thought okay but the capital spending in the first quarter was more robust

than it was in the second quarter and here's a big so do you have an

explanation for that sure well one of the things that

happened recall is that for equipment spending you were allowed to expense it

all the way retroactively back to October and so in the fourth quarter of

last year you could deduct a machine at 35 percent so you get a bigger tax

deduction and then at the start of this year then the value of that deduction

went down to 21 percent so we expected to see a spike in the fourth quarter and

then maybe even a negative number in the first quarter and it's in fact what we

got was the spike in the fourth quarter but then continued strong growth and

over the first half of the year so so capital spending by the way is one of

those things that when it pushes growth that it means that the growth

will be sustained because now we've got all these new factories and new machines

here in the US and you know over the next years they're going to produce more

output and so if you have a capital spending boom then you can expect that

to be sustained growth if it were a consumption boom then it might stop

tomorrow well here's another surprise in there this GDP of 4.1% came without any

increase from residential housing yeah we've actually down it's one of it one

of the bad pieces of news in it and and the other thing how do you explain that

though how do you explain that that housing problem it's something we're

studying very carefully and thinking about policy measures to address but I

can say that there are three factors one is that there's an increase in lumber

prices and part of that is driven by some insects and Canadian lumber second

is that home builders are saying that they're having a hard time finding

workers to build the homes and the third is that the hottest real estate markets

have really weird zoning regulations that make it hard to find a vacant

property and build a home sounds to me like one of the things you need to do is

have some guest workers from overseas a little more immigration they would

you'll be willing to support that cuz you know you get more people more

workers you get more GDP more prosperity we want something that brings prosperity

for all Americans and we want to increase GDP on a per capita basis and I

think they're you know basically as the president has emphasizing skilled

immigration is probably the right way to go all right you know as well as I do

the big critique here from our friends on the left is that this is a sugar high

this isn't sustainable this is a one-time hit what's the case for this

being sustainable you made you mention capital investment right but what else

Oh another thing is that you know the president has emphasized opening up

areas for oil exploration and there was a big increase in drilling and mining

activity in the second quarter consistent with that and really the

biggest story going forward to the second half of the year is that a lot of

times if the economy is really booming then inventories will be drawn down

because people are buying more stuff than the producers are making and if you

see an inventory drawdown then that's really positive for the quarters ahead

because the producers will want to build back up their inventories well inventory

subtracted a whole percentage point from GDP growth in the second quarter and we

expect that you'll see that percentage come back in the second half and again

last year in the fall we said that we'd see three point one percent growth this

year the first half is three point one and we're carrying into the second half

this inventory story which could mean that could even go higher okay now the

other big economic policy issue is is trade and I you know we're beginning to

see in earnings calls from CEOs and anecdotal reporting that we get you know

is they're saying look it's creating some uncertainty for me and I'm gonna

hold off investing in that plant or my costs are going up so I have to worry

here about how I manage that how big a headwind is trade policy going forward

well first you know perhaps even somewhat surprisingly to many in the

second quarter trade was a big positive in fact net exports skyrocketed and I

think that that's a sign that maybe one of the effects of the stress that you

mentioned is that people are restoring activity now in anticipation of you know

potential future future uncertainty but make no mistake about it the president

has guaranteed the American people that he would get them better trade deals

he's assured me over and over his objective is to move towards fully

reciprocal deals even zero-zero deals where everybody removes their tariffs of

non-tariff barriers and I would have to say that the people who are hoping for

that outcome must be really really happy about the meeting we had this week with

EU because it's clear that we move the ball way for it in the direction of

freer and fairer trade this week briefly Kevin are we gonna get a NAFTA deal

before the fall here that the this Congress Republican Congress can vote on

you know I'm not a negotiator but I view the things that I'm hearing from the

people that are involved in that especially ambassador Light Heiser is

that they're making tremendous progress my guess is you know that we will see

something by the fall but again I'm not the person who's authorized to come in

on those things but it is absolutely amazing you know the progress that

they're taking the reports that I'm hearing all right Kevin Hassett thanks

for being here thank you all it's great to be back when we come back the United

States and the European Union declare a tariff truce as the two sides continue

to negotiate a larger trade deal so is the protectionist threat over or are

there hurdles ahead

we agree today first of all to work together towards zero tariffs zero

non-tariff barriers and zero subsidies on non auto industrial goods we will

also work to reduce barriers and increase trade and services chemicals

pharmaceuticals medical products as well as soybeans this will open markets for

farmers and workers increase investment and lead to greater prosperity in both

the United States and the European Union that will also make trade fairer and

more reciprocal that was President Trump calling a tariff truce with the European

Union Trump and EU Commission President jean-claude Juncker announcing an

agreement Wednesday under which the US would back away from a threat to impose

25% tariffs on imported cars and rethink duties already placed on imported steel

and aluminum in return the you agreed to make unspecified purchases of US

soybeans and liquefied natural gas all this as the two sides work toward the

larger goal of zero tariffs barriers and subsidies let's bring in Wall Street

Journal assistant editorial page editor James Freeman and colonists Kim's Rasul

and Bill McGurn so James before we get to the trade issue I want to talk about

the GDP reports at 1% I was hoping for better expectations but what what do you

make of the as you examine the details of the report is is this is this

sustainable well first of all it is excellent so if the president wants to

call it huge fantastic beautiful he's entitled to and I think all Americans

should celebrate this is really the economy hitting a higher gear and

whether it's sustainable I think there are some interesting elements in there

and that is very strong business investment which suggests higher

productivity in the future higher growth in the future there's also this elements

within it in terms of final sales that suggests this isn't a one-hit wonder for

left-wing economists out there saying it's a sugar high

I think they're gonna be disappointed again well they were telling us that it

was secular stagnation bill that was Harry summers economist Larry Summers

view that said we can't grow much faster so we have to spend a trillion dollars

spend a trillion dollars on infrastructure right because tax reform

and deregulation that wouldn't do it and yet the policies are tax reform and

deregulation are we seeing the payoff i I think certainly we are look it's a

measure of how expectations have risen that I'm disappointed it's 4.1% you know

if you told me two years ago that I'd be disappointed that remember we were kind

of told by so many people that the new normal was 2% or under 2% I think from

2000 to 2015 the economy grew of 1.7% here which is miserable we have certain

liberal commentators in our paper which we publish the heineken blame me for

that who said I do you can't grow faster than 2% right and here we are and I

think we can grow faster than this you know Trump did predict that 4% yeah i

think i think i think you with the right policies i think they have to go a

little farther but you know Trump predicted this in the campaign was

laughed at saying we're gonna hit 3% 4% and maybe 5% Kim let's move to trade

let's talk about the truce here with the European Union what do you make of this

is this and why do you think Trump moved in this direction because you know

everything we heard internally for from from our sources for a long time was he

was dead set on really whacking German cars what changed well you know Paul

actually since we were talking about GDP he said something very interesting in

his press conference about those GDP numbers he said you know look the

economy's done fabulous but wait till we get these trade deals in place and then

it'll be even better which was notable because it is an

acknowledgement by Trump that trade matters to the economy and that if you

but and that the reverse would matter too so he's being told that these trade

fights that are going on are hurting all the good work Republicans have done in

terms of deregulation in taxes and I think that that was what was driving

this also it matter that Yonkers seemed willing to go to a

place that Trump is now pushing zero tariffs and barriers in the short term

it at least has avoided in a major conflict and those tariffs the longer

term that could be a much harder thing to pull off

so you think him that there was a political part of this and that

Republicans presumably in the Senate and the house were telling the president

looked these tariffs and the retaliation from them are really having an impact in

our districts and you need to ease up on this and kind of reset where you are in

the negotiations at least with the EU and I assume NAFTA behind the scenes may

be going the same direction yeah absolutely because by the way when you

impose tariffs as the president has been doing with China and elsewhere those

effects are felt immediately in these people's districts and States and he's

been getting a lot of pushback from the AG sector from different parts of the

manufacturing sector and even from his own economic King saying look we cannot

keep going down this road all right James what do you make of the the trade

agenda going forward and as you look at the GDP numbers did you see any impact

of trade the trade policies in the numbers yeah you saw a nice contribution

from exports so I think that's a nice reminder for everybody the president

included that this is a part of the growth strategy here it should be but

some of that was probably when people think was let's get out ahead of the of

the tariff science sell the soybeans early we may not get that bounce back in

the second or third quarter yeah I'm sure that was part of it but I would

also say that was probably balanced somewhat by the fear of trade fights

discouraging some investment we mentioned now although the capital

investment was terrific outstanding it wasn't quite as good as the first

quarter and I think some of that was maybe people being a little afraid to

pull the trigger on a new factory not knowing how this trade stuff was going

to be resolved but going forward I it is just really striking the way the tone of

these trade discussions has changed starting with a g7 meeting where the

president at the end says how about zero tariffs now it comes up again he's

obviously got the Germans excited about it

now mr. Yonker let's hope that is the discussion how do we low

instead of raised bill briefly is at the Kudlow effect Larry Kyle I don't know

look it's a big deal that we've stepped back you know in this Trump reminds me

of the old met relief pitcher tug mcgraw he'd come in with one on no outs in the

ninth inning and then he had load up the bases and then hit strike next out but

it was terrifying up until the end and so this is this is a good thing that

he's walked a and also I mean I don't agree with the strategy of protectionist

threats to achieve a free-market goal but he isn't looking for protection as

me is looking for zero tariffs since a lower

we hope so all right still ahead the Trump administration putting those

proposed auto tariffs on hold as the US and EU continue negotiations senator

Lamar Alexander on what that news means for the auto industry in Tennessee and

across the country when we come back

in tariffs remain in place and the investigation on autos will continue is

just we won't impose any auto tariffs as long as the negotiations are progressing

properly that was Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross

this week saying he'd continue his section 232 investigation into the

national security threat posed by importing cars trucks and auto parts but

that auto tariffs against the European Union would be put on hold as talks

between the US and the EU continue this is good news for Tennessee senator Lamar

Alexander who introduced a bipartisan bill this week to delay the proposed 25%

penalty and he joins us now senator welcome so usual you cheered the this

truce this week between the United States and the EU why well zero tariffs

is exactly the right policy that's what we did with the North American Free

Trade Agreement we implemented nearly zero tariffs over 15 years and and now

that we've got a policy of where we're going zero tariffs it's time to get rid

of the steel and aluminum tariffs which are driving up the costs of cars and

hurting the 136,000 Tennesseans who work in the automotive industry all right but

you heard the secretary Wilbur Ross say this week that he's still going to go

ahead with these 232 investigations which basically are designed to show

what to ask to answer the question do cars that are imported pose a national

security threat now do you think that BMWs or Nissan's

imported in the United States are at all plausibly a national security threat no

they're not of course they're not that and it's wrong for the president to use

that pretext but you know the bread-and-butter part of this is is this

I mean Tennessee has become in many ways of number one auto state we've got 929

auto parts suppliers 50% of the cars we make here are steel 10% are aluminum so

when the price of steel goes up 40% as it has since January think of what that

does to our economy in Tennessee into the jobs

in Tennessee so we're shooting ourselves in the foot with the tariffs and it's

time to do what the president said this week zero tariffs is the right goal and

the sooner the better well are you hearing from the companies

in Tennessee that in fact their costs are going up where their supply chains

are being disrupted because of the steel and aluminum tariffs of course I am and

and you saw this week that Ford in General Motors and General Motors as a

big plant in Tennessee they announced that they had they were each lost 300

million dollars this year they have to tell that to their stockholders and they

attributed most of that to the tariffs so you know you can't you can't be in a

zero tariffs world which is where the president wants to go and raise the

price of steel forty percent and still make cars and trucks in Tennessee that

are competitive to sell in the United States or export around the world which

we do a lot how many of the cars do you know off the top of your head that are

made in Tennessee and you got a Nissan plant there and they get a Volkswagen

plant Chattanooga and a GM plant Springhill doo-doo-doo how many of those

cars are exported outside the United States well I don't know the exact

number but billions of dollars of cars are exported and billions of parts are

exported the real employment in our state is with the 900-plus

auto parts suppliers and the way you make automobiles you a Nissan Rogue will

go back and forth with its parts to Canada to Mexico and then back to Smyrna

Tennessee before it's finally built that's permits it to be built in a

competitive way at a low cost and sold successfully here and then exported

around the world okay your colleague from Tennessee bob Corker has introduced

a bill with a couple of other colleagues to try to take back some of the

president's authority to use to 232 on that national security definition to

impose tariffs he hasn't been able to get a vote on that be with some of your

colleagues in the Senate why not

well getting a vote on anything's hard in the Senate I'm a co-sponsor Senator

corkers bill but I think the the visits we've had with the president Senator

corkers bill my bill all all the activity that we've had in the Senate to

say that tariffs are shooting ourselves in the foot really shooting ourselves in

both feet we have a trade problem but the way you solve a trade problem is not

to shoot yourself in the foot you find some other way to deal with it so now

that the president has said let's go to zero tariffs which is the same thing

Japan and Europe are doing with each other over a long term right exactly the

same thing we did with the north american free trade agreement let's head

in that direction I think we've had our impact and that suspect will get a vote

as time goes on okay now the president also saying trying to renegotiate NAFTA

what's your advice to the President on NAFTA do you are you saying let's close

this renegotiation as soon as possible so we can have a vote this Congress yes

let's get it let's get it done before September NAFTA has been good for

Tennessee I mean we've doubled the amount of cars

and auto jobs we've had in Tennessee and it's been good for the United States in

my opinion the president disagrees with that fact is we're making about as many

cars in the United States today about 12 million as we did when NAFTA was signed

in 1944 the only difference is we've had about three and a half million jobs

shift not overseas but from the Midwest to Tennessee and other states in the

southeast because of right-to-work laws and because it's more competitive so

you

For more infomation >> KIMBERLY STRASSEL U.S. AND EUROPE CAIL TRADE TRUCE - Duration: 20:15.

-------------------------------------------

Fareed: Trump's flip-flopping bad for US reputation abroad - Duration: 3:56.

For more infomation >> Fareed: Trump's flip-flopping bad for US reputation abroad - Duration: 3:56.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. paid no money to North Korea for the repatriation of remains of American troops - Duration: 1:46.

North Korea returned 55 sets of soldiers' remains to the U.S on Friday.

And while reports and government officials have said that Pyongyang had been reimbursed

for related caosts, it appears that no money was exchanged this time around.

Lee Ji-won has more.

The U.S. says it made no payments to North Korea for the return of the remains of American

troops last week.

Answering a question from South Korea's Yonhap News Agency, the U.S. State Department spokesperson

Heather Nauert wrote that the Secretary of Defense has the authority to reimburse the

North, or any other country, for expenses associated with the recovery and storage of

remains.

But in this instance, it said North Korea did not ask for money and no money was exchanged.

The message went on to say that the repatriation was part of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's

commitment to the promise he made to U.S. President Donald Trump and that it is one

of the palpable implementations of the Joint Statement, agreed by the two leaders in Singapore

last month.

This comes after North Korea on Friday returned 55 boxes of remains of American soldiers killed

in the Korean War.

Prior to the return, a Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency official had said that, though the

U.S. government does not pay any government or individual for the remains of missing Americans,...

it is authorized to reimburse the North for the costs of the operation, from recovery

to return.

A Congressional Research Service report showed that Washington paid 28 million U.S. dollars

to North Korea for the recovery of remains between 1996 and 2005, as a reimbursement

for the costs of their joint field activities.

Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. paid no money to North Korea for the repatriation of remains of American troops - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

N. Korea, U.S. likely to look for common ground on denuclearization, security guarantee - Duration: 1:55.

And the main pledges from the Singapore summit -- North Korea's denuclearization, and what

it will get in return.

The repatriation may have added some momentum to that front.

It's now expected that the North and the U.S. will get back to work on denuclearization...

and the security guarantee Pyongyang wants from Washington.

Oh Jung-hee has more details.

Now that North Korea has returned more of the remains of American soldiers who died

in the Korean War... attention falls on how Pyongyang and Washington will proceed with

denuclearization talks.

Though Friday's repatriation is not directly relevant to Pyongyang's denuclearization,...

it's widely seen that the move did help both sides build trust... and therefore, could

have a positive effect on their denuclearization dialogue.

Since the June 12th summit in Singapore, North Korea and the U.S. have had difficulty moving

forward on the denuclearization front.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Pyongyang for the third time... but could

not meet Kim Jong-un... and after his visit, the North claimed Washington was making unilateral

demands about denuclearization and inspections.

Pyongyang began dismantling key facilities at its Sohae Satellite Launching Station -- believed

to have been the regime's key ICBM test site -- but at the same time, pressed Washington

and Seoul to declare a formal end to the Korean War.

From here on, it's expected that North Korea and the U.S. will focus on finding a middle

ground between the U.S. giving the regime a security guarantee through measures like

ending the Korean War... and Pyongyang taking steps to denuclearize.

This week, the foreign ministers of the two Koreas, the U.S., and China will all be attending

the ASEAN Regional Forum in Singapore.

Their meetings, bilateral or otherwise, could help add momentum to the Pyongyang-Washington

denuclearization talks.

Oh Jung-hee, Arirang News.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét