BEN NORTON: It's The Real News, I'm Ben Norton.
  The Organization of American States is a Cold  War era international body of countries in
  North and South America that claims to be  independent and neutral, but in reality, frequently
  acts as a proxy for the United States government.
  The OAS is notorious for its extreme bias  against left-wing governments in Latin America,
  particularly Cuba and Venezuela.
  Western corporate media outlets frequently  echo the OAS's anti-Cuba and anti-Venezuela
  reports, without providing any further information  as to what exactly the OAS is, and what interests
  it serves.
  In reality however, the OAS was formed at  the behest of the U.S. government as a coalition
  of anti-communist governments at the beginning  of the Cold War.
  In 1948, the U.S. convened the International  Conference of American States.
  At this meeting in Colombia, which was led  by the U.S. Secretary of State an infamous
  cold warrior, George Marshall, the right-wing  governments of Latin America joined the U.S.
  in signing a charter that established the  Organization of American States with the explicit
  goal of fighting the spread of socialism and  defending capitalism in North and South America.
  Although media outlets today cite the OAS  as if it were supposedly an independent and
  impartial source, U.S. government bodies have  openly admitted otherwise.
  The U.S. Agency for International Development,  USAID, which is an ostensible aid organization
  that serves as the soft power arm of the U.S.  government, wrote very clearly in its 2008
  Congressional Budget Justification, that the  OAS, "promotes U.S. political and economic
  interests in the Western Hemisphere by countering  the influence of anti-U.S. countries such
  as Venezuela."
  On May 29, an OAS panel released a report  accusing Venezuela's leftist government, led
  by elected President Nicolás Maduro, of supposedly  committing crimes against humanity.
  The panel plans to present evidence for these  alleged crimes to the International Criminal
  Court.
  Journalist Max Blumenthal attended the OAS  press conference on May 29 in Washington D.C.
  In the Q&A session, Max Blumenthal called  out the OAS for its extreme bias and hypocrisy.
  MAX BLUMENTHAL: I questioned the members of  the panel about their moral consistency and
  claim of independence.
  Max Blumenthal- my question is, I was told  that independent experts would be at this
  panel.
  Mr. Cotler has been a lawyer for the right-wing  coup leader Leopoldo Lopez, and he's also
  spent his career defending Israeli human rights  crimes.
  He recently defended the shooting and killing  of 62 protesters in the Gaza Strip, along
  with the shooting of thousands more.
  BEN NORTON: That was Max Blumenthal, speaking  at the OAS press conference.
  Joining us to discuss this is Max Blumenthal.
  Max is an award-winning journalist and the  author of several books.
  He is also the editor of the investigative  journalism website, The Grayzone Project.
  Max just published an article and an accompanying  video at that website.
  The article is called, OAS Panel Accusing  Venezuela of "Crimes Against Humanity" is
  Grilled on Moral Hypocrisy and Open Bias.
  You can find the article and the accompanying  video at grayzoneproject.com.
  I also cohost the Moderate Rebels Podcast  with Max and I contribute to his website.
  Thanks for joining us, Max.
  MAX BLUMENTHAL: Great to be on.
  BEN NORTON: So, can you just speak about what  happened at this press conference you attended
  in Washington D.C. and what you told the OAS?
  MAX BLUMENTHAL: First of all, thanks for that  really informative introduction.
  It really highlights the role, the damaging  role, that the OAS plays in the Western Hemisphere,
  where all Latin American countries are expected  to pay into this organization.
  That means that millions and millions of taxpayers  in Latin America have to pay into the budget
  of this organization.
  And it's used simply as a weapon of Washington  against any government that violates the Washington
  consensus, in this case, Venezuela.
  The last two OAS Secretary Generals, the current  one and the last one, Insulza, have just waged
  these obsessive campaigns to push regime change  in Venezuela.
  And when I got to this event yesterday, it  was 2:00 PM and this was the only panel I'd
  heard about.
  But I was told that there were five other  panels on Venezuela.
  It's like, just this nonstop Woodstock of  regime change and it's going to continue,
  I think, into the OAS General Session, which  will just be held on Venezuela.
  What brought me to the panel was the nature  of the so-called independent experts who were
  seated on the panel.
  I was just shocked at who they were, especially  Irwin Cotler, who is the Canadian version
  of Alan Dershowitz.
  I think Alan Dershowitz even said, "He's my  Canadian mirror image."
  And Irwin Cotler is this- he was a right-wing  Canadian parliamentarian with the Conservative
  Party until fairly recently, who had just  used his position to push the Israel lobby's
  line in parliament and in Canadian society  and across the world.
  And whenever Israel committed some kind of  atrocity, the Mavi Marmara massacre or one
  war after another in Gaza, Cotler would rush  out, just like Dershowitz, as Israel's public
  advocate.
  He's also claimed that he was Nelson Mandela's  lawyer.
  And I don't know what kind of evidence there  is there, but in Nelson Mandela's memoir,
  The Long March to Freedom, there is no mention  of Irwin Cotler.
  There's a lot of mention of Oliver Tambo,  but nothing about Cotler.
  So, he's just a suspicious, sort of morally  dubious, figure.
  And for him to be on this panel, I think they  just deserved to be questioned about that.
  When I got there, the OAS Secretary General  was waving around this 400-page report accusing
  the Venezuelan government of crimes against  humanity and demanding that President Nicolás
  Maduro, who is now facing crushing sanctions  because he won an election, should be brought
  before the International Criminal Court.
  All the other panelists echoed this recommendation.
  And I noticed that Santiago Canton was also  on the panel.
  Canton is an Argentinean lawyer who's also  a regime change activist.
  And in 2002, when Canton was the head of the  Inter-American Commission on Human Rights,
  he attempted to legitimize the coup dictatorship  that briefly overthrew President Hugo Chavez,
  and wrote a letter to the Foreign Minister  of this briefly installed dictatorship, before
  it was thrown out again by Venezuelan citizens,  referring to him as "His Excellency," and
  basically saying, "Please take care of Chavez  when he's in your custody and you're the new
  government."
  So, the whole panel was compromised, but it's  emblematic of what the OAS as an organization
  is.
  And it was me sitting there in a room full  of all of the major news agencies taking pictures
  of the panel and asking softball questions.
  And as soon as I got home after the panel,  Bloomberg and Reuters and all the agencies
  had articles up that said, "OAS Accuses Venezuela  of Crimes Against Humanity."
  And all the headlines basically supported,  without any criticism, what this 400-page
  document contained.
  And I would just point to one comment by Irwin  Cotler which summed up the hyperbolic and
  propagandistic nature of the whole presentation,  which is that "Venezuela was responsible for
  the worst humanitarian catastrophe in Latin  American history."
  So, I mean, worse than the genocide of the  indigenous population?
  I mean, that's basically what he was saying,  and that kind of rhetoric prevailed throughout
  the entire session.
  BEN NORTON: Yeah, of course, we recently saw  Ríos Montt, who was a U.S.-backed dictator
  in Guatemala, who himself was responsible  for actual crimes against humanity.
  He oversaw genocide against indigenous Maya  in Guatemala as part of a larger anticommunist
  counterinsurgency campaign.
  And then of course, there's the "Dirty Wars,"  again backed by the U.S., and Pinochet the
  Chilean dictator.
  So, it's certainly an extremely hyperbolic  for him to claim that.
  But just quickly wrapping up here Max, I'm  wondering if you can just briefly comment
  on how this reflects this kind of Washington  D.C. bubble, where you see corporate media
  outlets will just trot out to these events  and just film what these panelists say without
  ever questioning who the panelists are, what  they're prerogatives are, and just reciting
  and echoing verbatim, their claims as news.
  MAX BLUMENTHAL: Yeah, I mean, I couldn't have  put it any better than that.
  And what you see with the "Beltway culture"  and the nexus with mainstream media is a de-democratization
  of the American public on the issue of foreign  policy.
  When reporters don't go to these events, or  to the think tank events, and ask critical
  questions of fake experts who are actually  just activists on behalf of the Washington
  consensus, and when the public is not involved  in any of these forums, and when the media
  doesn't report critically, there's very little  reason for the public to question foreign
  policy at all.
  Everything's just fine.
  We do see a debate on things like local school  budgets, or you see some critical reporting
  on the school-to-prison pipeline, domestic  issues.
  But on foreign policy, it's just this kind  of elite debate carried out inside, or it's
  not a debate at all.
  There's an elite consensus carried out inside  a foreign policy bubble in the Beltway, and
  the OAS event was completely a portrait of  that.
  When I got up and asked this question, you  could see the OAS staff start to whisper to
  each other, "How the hell did he get in this  room?"
  And I just registered as a journalist and  asked what I thought was a fair but critical
  question.
  And they were really upset.
  And I was also approached by several journalists  afterwards, just asking, "Who are you?"
  Kind of like, "What wandered into this room?"
  But you know, I think that's our job.
  And as long as I'm in Washington, I'll report  on it just like I reported on any other place.
  It's unfortunate that the agencies won't.
  BEN NORTON: Well, thank you for your reporting  Max, and thanks for joining us here.
  I was joined by Max Blumenthal, who is an  award-winning investigative journalist and
  the author of several books.
  He's also the editor of The Grayzone Project,  which you can find that grayzoneproject.com.
  He just published an article and an accompanying  video about this OAS panel on Venezuela.
  Thanks Max.
  MAX BLUMENTHAL: Thanks a lot, Ben.
  BEN NORTON: Reporting for The Real News, I'm  Ben Norton.
     
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét