Auto news on Youtube Sep 1 2018

But before we do that, give us the big picture for people that are just joining us for the

very first time.

Hindson: Okay, John.

We're coming up on the halfway point of the book of Revelation.

Chapter 1 is like the preface, the introduction.

The risen Christ appears to John on the island of Patmos and commissions His own personal

disciple, "Write the book of the Revelation."

Then in chapters 2 and 3 Jesus proclaims, a proclamation of the letters to the seven

churches in Asia Minor back on the coast.

And to each church He speaks as Lord of the church with authority.

And then we came to the section where you have the problem that had to be resolved in

the book in chapters 4 and 5.

John was caught up into heaven.

He sees God the Father on the throne.

The seven-sealed scroll is in His hand, but no one is found worthy to open the seals and

proclaim the inheritance until the Lamb appears.

And Jesus then appears throughout the book of Revelation symbolically as the Lamb of

God, the one who died for our sins.

He is worthy; He can come and open the scroll, pronounce the judgments.

And then we saw that as He opened the seals you begin to see a process of judgment that

follows in chapters 6 through 11.

The six seals are opened; the wrath of the Lamb is being poured out.

Then you have an interlude.

Then the seventh seal is opened.

And out of the seventh seal come the sounding of the seven trumpet judgments.

And then after the seven trumpet judgments, reach the sixth one, all of a sudden you have

another interlude that deals with the little book that John was told to eat[!?] and two

dead men that are going to be killed [!?] and yet resurrected and will come back to life!?

What in the world is all of that about right there in the middle of the book of Revelation?

Ankerberg: Yes.

Let's start, Ron, with the little book.

What in the world is this little book that they're talking about?

Rhodes: Well, there's different interpretations as to what that little book is.

In fact, just recently I was looking at some commentaries and one guy thought it was maybe

a title deed of the earth, kind of similar to what we talked about earlier with the other

book.

Ankerberg: With the scrolls.

Rhodes: There's others who say it's the seven-sealed scroll itself.

I personally believe that it contains information about the prophecies that are yet to come

during the tribulation period.

And, in fact, if I was to title it, I would title it "Things to Come," kind of like

the book of one of my old professors, Dwight Pentecost.

The reason I think it contains that information is that John is portrayed as eating the book.

And it's sweet to the taste, but then it becomes sour.

And what I think that means is that he's talking about the good stuff that's yet

ahead for Christians.

We've got the millennial kingdom coming; we've got the eternal state which is just

indescribably great.

So that's sweet.

But then as it goes down to his stomach it turns sour.

And I think that that probably metaphorically represents the prophecies about unbelievers

and the judgments that are yet to come for them, especially those terrible, terrible

bowl judgments at the end that will unfold in rapid-fire fashion.

For more infomation >> What is the "little book" that John was told to eat? - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

What is the standard for medical malpractice? - Duration: 6:34.

My name is Zaheer A. Shah, M.D. J.D.

I'm the principal and founding partner of Shah

and Associates. It's a medical malpractice

and personal injury law firm based

currently in Tempe, Arizona.

Well, medical negligence, before we talk

about that let's talk a little bit about

just what negligence itself is.

So negligence is essentially a failure to

act reasonably. That's the standard that

is used by the courts to determine what

is a proper or improper act.

Now, let me give you an example of that.

So with respect to the automobile

industry... Over time, negligence or a

failure to act responsibly or reasonably,

evolves. For example, brake lights.

Initially there were no brake lights on

a car, but then over time we determined

that in order for the car to be

reasonably safe it should have brake

lights, and then eventually we evolved to

the point where you also have safety

harnesses, safety belts, and now even

airbags. And I'm sure the future will

hold even further advances that

determine or define what reasonable is,

and the reasonable is the exact opposite

of negligence. Because the medical space

is a much more sophisticated service

area where you have highly trained

providers, medical negligence has to be

really carefully defined. And the term of

art that's used in that space is

"standard of care." So we expect all

providers not to be outstanding

providers, but to at least meet a basic

threshold standard of care that they

deliver to the patients that they are

caring for. How is that standard of care

arrived that will distinguish negligence

from something that is not negligent?

Well there's a lot of factors that go

into that. It can be determined or

dependent on where the provider is

practicing. So if you're in a remote

rural area, the standard of care may be

completely different than if you're

practicing in Boston. If you are a

specialist versus a general practitioner,

the standard of care may vary. Ultimately,

negligence or meeting the standard of

care or lack thereof is one of the

critical elements that are necessary to

prove

in order to have an effective or

successful medical malpractice lawsuit.

So it's one of three really critical

areas of the litigation of one of my

clients injuries at the hands of a

medical provider that I have to fulfill.

So negligence as we understand it is

about standard of care, and the real

analysis is, is did the provider meet

that standard of care? Because if they

didn't,

that's medical negligence. Well a lot of

people when they think about medical

negligence, they assume that as long as

they find negligence, or they've been the

victim of negligence, that they've got a

lawsuit. And oftentimes I have to be the

bearer of bad news, which is to state

that, "no, there's a lot more that goes

into whether or not you're going to have

a viable medical malpractice lawsuit."

So what I oftentimes suggest is, is begin

with, what was the harm or injury that

had been sustained? If the harm or injury

is substantial and likely permanent, then

that's a case that needs to be

investigated more fully. Once you do that,

then you have to look at, was there a

standard of care violation? Was the

provider that rendered the care that

resulted in this substantial and

permanent injury, was that care above

that standard of care or was it below?

Now keep in mind again, we're not

expecting our providers to be

extraordinary caregivers or to practice

in the latest state-of-the-art, that's

not what the law requires or expects of

them. There is a lowest common

denominator however, which is communally

determined by the community of providers

who all would agree that this is the

basic minimum that must be fulfilled in

order for that provider, in that space, at

that time, with that particular patient,

is meeting the standard of care. Now as

you can imagine, that becomes somewhat

controversial. So the doctor defendant is

going to find medical experts that say

she met the standard of care. As a

plaintiff's attorney, one of my

obligations or responsibilities is to

find medical experts that will further

my client's case, which is to establish that

there was in fact a breach or a

violation of the standard of care.

So medical negligence or a violation of

standard of care is a critical element

in furthering a medical malpractice

lawsuit, but it's not the only one.

So we were talking about the elements that are

required or must be fulfilled in order

for there to be a successful medical

malpractice lawsuit, for there to be a

resolution to it that is hopefully in

favor of your client. Well you clearly

have to have medical negligence,

that's that standard of care that we've

been talking about. Our argument is if

there's been a violation or a breach in

the standard of care, that equals medical

negligence. But that's not enough. We then

have to prove that that medical

negligence actually resulted or caused

the damages or injuries that we're

claiming harm for. And sometimes what

happens is, is there can in fact be

medical negligence, but there may be some

other intervening event, or some other

complication that actually resulted in

the harms. And so we have to very

closely - proximately is the legal term -

but I tell my clients that means it has

to be closely connected, not just a

general sense of, "well this could have

caused that." But no, we have to yolk it

together very nicely and tightly that

the medically negligent act is what

directly and proximately caused the

harms for which we are now seeking

recovery. Sometimes, a case can actually

fail, not because there wasn't any

negligence, and not because there weren't

sufficient damages that are substantial

and permanent, but because of an

inability to connect causally the

medical negligence and that harm, which

is why one of the medical experts that

are utilized in medical malpractice

lawsuits are actually causation experts.

So you can have a standard of care

expert to talk about how the standard of

care was violated or breached, but then

you also will require a causation expert

who can use her special expertise to say,

"I believe based upon a review of all of

the facts in this case that that

medically negligent act in fact caused

the harms for which we are now seeking

damages or recovery."

For more infomation >> What is the standard for medical malpractice? - Duration: 6:34.

-------------------------------------------

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE REACH AT THE END OF MAP GTA V - Duration: 9:10.

For more infomation >> WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE REACH AT THE END OF MAP GTA V - Duration: 9:10.

-------------------------------------------

'I Just Don't Know What It Was That We Did Wrong,' Says Mom Of Raising Teen She Claims Is Out Of … - Duration: 3:41.

For more infomation >> 'I Just Don't Know What It Was That We Did Wrong,' Says Mom Of Raising Teen She Claims Is Out Of … - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

What is a self charging hybrid is it a REX BEV or a PHEV? ITS NON! 🔌🔋🚗 - Duration: 6:51.

welcome to this week's vlog on this week's vlog we're going to be talking

about an amazing system that's called the self charging hybrid system yes you

heard me right a self charging hybrid system

now if you've seen Toyota and

Lexus is adverts obviously Toyota owns Lexus they have gone for an

amazing self perpetual-motion device called a self charging hybrid yes they

have a hybrid that completely charges itself what an amazing piece of

technology I mean Newton would be proud they have

basically broken all the barriers of physics and invented a device that

completely self charges now if you see Toyota and Lexus advert it clearly says

they've chosen a device it charges itself and does not require a plug yes

that's right Toyota chosen not to put a plug on their hybrid

no no there's self charges itself now if you weren't aware Mercedes yes right

under here is Mercedes self charging hybrid battery yes you heard me right

right under here is a 12-volt standard okay it's time to drop the sarcasm

obviously Mercedes do not make a self-driving hybrid but also neither do

Toyota it's time I get technical for the first time ever in my videos and explain

the full difference between different cars so obviously got a ICE combustion

car which is a pure petrol or diesel car runs on combustion fuel 100% that drives

the wheels we all know what they are they've been around for decades the next

car is what we call a battery car BEV but a battery electric vehicle which

basically means the whole car is powered purely by electric so that includes the

Renault Zoe and obviously the Nissan Leaf and all the Tesla's we then have a

REX which is a range extender this has a electric motor and it also has a small

engine the engine charges the battery and the wheels are

powered by the battery alone so basically the even that has an engine a

combustion engine combustion engine is there to facilitate the energy of

electricity so therefore it's more efficient the engine is tuned to run it

the most efficient rate and therefore that's why REX's are actually not that

bad we next then move on to hybrids now a hybrid car works a bit like a Formula

one kurs system it constantly recharges the battery from the motion of

regenerative braking so same as what your electric car does anyway all our

cars regenerative braking but a hybrid car regenerates just purely from that energy

that loss energy doesn't it runs purely purely mainly on the ice engine the ice

engine is the main form of that movement and it uses the petrol of the ice and

the driving normal driving to repower a battery to that then gets put back into the

wheels it's more efficient than an ICE better for the environment than a

ICE but it's not as good as the other two that I've just previously mentioned

we then move on to a PHEV now this is a PHEV BMW i8 a PHEV is a

vehicle that has a plug the plug powers a battery the battery powers the wheels

now being a PHEV bit also has an internal combustion engine which also

powers the wheels and also charges the battery when the battery runs low the

idea of a plug-in hybrid is you can select purely run off the battery London

taxis are PHEVs Outlanders are PHEV's a PHEV is obviously a lot better than their normal

hybrid because you if you wanted to you could run it purely off the battery and

never use a combustion engine as long as the rangers in the battery range of the

vehicle they obviously have a much smaller battery than full BEV's but

there are a lot more environmentally friendly than some of the other options

that you can get the question is where does Toyota's system fit in would you

say it's a range extender which what it sounds like a self charging hybrid

sounds like a range extender it's not a range extender

it's also not a plug-in hybrid it's also not a full BEV it's also not

self-charging what it basically is just a hybrid it

uses the ice engine and then almost like a Kurs system like Formula one like I

mentioned before it's using the motion of the wheels of slowing down

regenerative braking to charge a little battery which then puts a couple of

miles extra range onto the ice motor yes it's better for the environment than a

full ice but it's certainly not a self charging vehicle and it certainly

shouldn't be advertised as well there was nothing wrong with the term hybrid

hybrid just means exactly what's Toyota have got they're very very first

electric car was a hybrid they called it hybrid and now they've invented a new

term called a self charging hybrid which is just a way to mislead people and

consumers into buying vehicles I find that confusing so someone who doesn't

work and sort of study the electric car industry is going to find the even more

confusing than I do now the reason I've mentioned all this is I want you to go

down to the description below there's a link to the

Advertising Standards Agency and I want you to report Toyota for they're really

basically trying to take advantage of customers poor knowledge of electric

vehicles now I've not got any problems with a hybrid which doesn't have a plug

I've got no problem with it it's better than ICE car so before everyone starts

pulling in the comments no you shouldn't say this yes it is better than than a

ice car but no problem with that my issue is the confusing advertisement

that they're using and they're doing it on purpose and I think it's deliberately

misleading to fool people into thinking that it it's got some sort of fake

collection energy device it's very poor practice of Toyota they know exactly

what they're doing and they need to stop it now you might

want to know why I was making a little joke about the 12-volt battery on the

Mercedes the reason for that is self charging hybrid gives the impression

that a battery that charges itself up now 12-volt battery on any ice car

charges itself up from an alternator so does that mean that all ice cars are

self charging hybrids no it doesn't so really what Toyota should

be doing is just calling it a hybrid like everyone else thanks very much for

watching this week's video don't forget to click here to become a

patreon click here to subscribe and check out my other videos down here

thanks very much and I'll see you again next week goodbye

For more infomation >> What is a self charging hybrid is it a REX BEV or a PHEV? ITS NON! 🔌🔋🚗 - Duration: 6:51.

-------------------------------------------

John McCain's good friend, Chuck Larson, was 'synonymous with what is good at the Naval Academy' - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> John McCain's good friend, Chuck Larson, was 'synonymous with what is good at the Naval Academy' - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

Glee's Kevin McHale Transformed His Body to Fix Stomach Issues: 'I Was Constantly in Pain' - Duration: 3:30.

 When Kevin McHale needed a solution for his unbearable stomach problems, he turned to a gym for help — and completely transformed his body in the process

 The former Glee star joined Ultimate Performance gym in Los Angeles, and over the course of 12 weeks, he dropped 8

2 percent body fat, gained 5 lbs. of muscle and now feels "confident."  "I had become 'skinny fat,' " McHale, 30, said in a statement

"I had been working through an intestinal and digestion issue that was eluding diagnosis and that really took a toll on me

"  The actor said that he was "constantly in pain" from his stomach issues. He tried elimination diets to determine what foods were causing problems, but nothing worked

 "It got to the point where I was already feeling miserable because the intestinal issues, and plus the self-added guilt of not getting myself to the gym or eating as healthily as possible, it was a recipe for disaster," he said

 Plus, he just "felt badly about his body" overall. "Not necessarily from a superficial standpoint — I did want to look better, but I mostly felt terrible

"  McHale decided to start working with a trainer at Ultimate Performance, who helped him revamp his diet and put him through regular exercises

 "While only a few of the exercises were new to me, the attention to detail and technique was completely new," he said

"Eddie [his trainer] was also getting me used to pushing myself to the point of failure, conditioning me to be comfortable with that, knowing that I could push myself harder than I thought I could and when I couldn't, he would be there to quite literally take the weight from me

I realized over those first few weeks that the little changes and corrections during every single rep were what was really making the difference

"  McHale said he was "most excited and most scared" to tackle the diet, which was a major departure from his usual meals of burritos and cookies

On the new plan, he focused on counting his macros — the caloric content of a food — in three categories: fats, carbohydrates and proteins

 That combo helped him completely change his life.  "When you're investing your time and energy into yourself in this way, it changes so much of your life," McHale said

"The things that seem little, like getting better sleep because you've actually worked your body out, all add up to feeling better physically, mentally and emotionally

Now, I feel good, I feel like I know how to properly workout in a gym, I know how to eat well and most importantly I feel like I came away with the knowledge that I'll be able to use forever

"

For more infomation >> Glee's Kevin McHale Transformed His Body to Fix Stomach Issues: 'I Was Constantly in Pain' - Duration: 3:30.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking News - Vincent Kompany on what would've happened if City didn't win 2012 PL - Duration: 3:16.

In exclusive extracts from a forthcoming book chronicling the Abu Dhabi United group's 10-year ownership of Manchester City, key figures reveal the inside story of City's remarkable rags-to-riches transformation

Vincent Kompany and Manchester City were locked in a two-horse race with United at the end of the 2011-12 season in what was to become a memorable finale

'I think that's the game with the most pressure on it that I've ever been in,' says Kompany of the seismic April 2012 derby in which his goal saw City take control of the title race

'I'm good at dealing with pressure so I was kind of comfortable still, but it was insane because it was a midweek game so everyone was watching it

It was United versus City. It was basically for the title. 'I think you can almost see it on my face after the goal, this…' - he searches for the words to describe it- '…it's not anger, or frustration, but it's definitely pent-up emotion that comes out because you want to almost rebel against this image

You want to rebel against what everybody thinks this is going to turn out to be. 'That game was fantastic because obviously we scored the goal, which happened to be me, but we didn't concede one shot on target that game, against Manchester United, title contenders, and that to me was powerful in terms of how you react in big moments

' All City needed to do was beat relegation-threatened QPR at home to secure their first title for 44 years - But going into injury time they found themselves 2-1 down

'It makes me sick to even talk about it,' Kompany says, when asked to contemplate what would have happened if things had turned out differently

'I think we would have gone into hiding for two months. It would have been a stain, really, because we did so many great things that season

Throwing it away against a team that's fighting for relegation at home would have been a catastrophe

'I can't even describe it. I don't know where the belief would have come from for anything else after that

' Kompany believes big characters came up for the big moments. 'We went to Newcastle for the second-last game of the season,' he recalls, 'and Yaya came up to me in the hotel and he said, "Oh Vinnie

You know, you've headed the ball and tackled brilliantly all season. Thank you. Now," and he taps his chest, "leave it to me"

' 'I was like, "What's he on about?" Oh, Yaya being himself again! So, I just go and do my thing

'Next thing you know, we play this game, win 2-0, and Yaya scores two. Big players, big moments kind of thing

'Then, we prepare for the QPR game, and Kun [Sergio Aguero] does the same thing

He comes to me and says, "Vinnie, today, leave it to me". You know, they'd never done this before, they've never done since

Only these two games. I'll remember it forever.'

For more infomation >> Breaking News - Vincent Kompany on what would've happened if City didn't win 2012 PL - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

This is what Kate Middleton inherited from the late Princess Diana - Duration: 2:49.

 Today marks the anniversary of the death of Princess Diana, the people's princess

 She was an amazing woman, who left two equally amazing sons behind when she passed away

 After her death, it was discovered that Princess Diana left her £21 million fortune to her two sons, and her 17 godchildren

 In her "letter of wishes", Diana demanded that her two sons had the exclusive rights on all of her beautiful jewellery

   Princess Diana wrote:  "I would like you to divide my personal chattels at your discretion between my sons and godchildren, the division being three quarters to my sons and one quarter to my godchildren

"  "But I would like you to allocate all my jewellery to the share to be held by my sons, so that their wives may, in due course, have it or use it

"  "I leave the exact division of the jewellery to your discretion."    And of course, we know that Kate Middleton has received a number of items from Diana's collection

 Kate's engagement ring was Diana's engagement ring, mad up of a large sapphire and smaller diamonds

 Kate has worn the Lover's Knot Tiara, which was gifted to Diana from the Queen on her wedding day

   After her wedding to Prince William, Kate also inherited a pair of Diana's sapphire earrings, and a pearl bracelet

 The beautiful Meghan Markle has also received some of Diana's jewellry.  On her wedding day, after the ceremony, Meghan was seen wearing an aquamarine ring once worn by her mother-in-law

 I've no doubt that Diana would be very proud of her sons, and their gorgeous wives

     We're chatting food and happiness with Sarah Doyle and Rachel Keane. Catch up on all our previous episodes on Spotify now

  We're chatting food and happiness with Sarah Doyle and Rachel Keane. Catch up on all our previous episodes on Spotify now