Auto news on Youtube Mar 12 2018

Hello everyone and welcome to today's talk.

So today I'd like to talk about the question, "What is choiceless awareness?"

Now can we talk about this by merely answering this question or describing this state of

choiceless awareness?

Now isn't the term, "Choiceless awareness" only a mere snapshot of the actuality of it?

Because immediately, once we talk about what choiceless awareness is, we believe that it

is this "thing."

And therefore, we try to enact it, bring it about or try to maintain this state right?

And therefore, that implies choosing to be choicelessly aware, therefore, are we seeing

the contradiction there?

And choiceless awareness, the "actuality" of it, implies no choosing, no choice, whatsoever.

So I feel that we have to go into this completely differently.

So instead can we talk about the choosing process and therefore, ourselves, come to

an understanding of what choiceless awareness is?

So what is this choosing process?

How do we navigate through this, through understanding this?

Now isn't our thinking process or choosing process... isn't that machinery?

It is like an automated targeting system.

It is always operating, recording everything in our ongoing experience, just like everything

we do on a computer.

The hard drive records it and saves it and stores it up as memory.

This brain is a machine, it stores up our past experiences into the brain cells as memory.

And there we begin to act, communicate and everything we do is memory right?

Because we are using words that we have learned, we are basically doing things in order to

get somewhere, to get answers, to achieve, to become, etc. all that.

So therefore, why does this choosing process believe that it can come to or discover a

sense of completeness, wholeness?

Meaning this choosing process is like a targeting system, because our thoughts respond to whatever

our senses pick up.

Thought sense, touch, smell, taste, our thought responds to that.

And the human organism is limited to the range of our senses.

How far I can see.

How extensive my arm goes out to touch whatever is around me.

What I can smell in my particular area that I'm in...

So our senses are always limited to this center, this range of this particular human body,

physical organism and our thought responds to that, it records that, stores it up in

the brain cells as memory, as thought and therefore, it desires the other.

So thought is targeting.

It's always targeting looking for complete, permanent, satisfaction correct?

Without dissatisfaction.

So if I smell something wonderful, like, let's say a fresh salad in the afternoon...

I smell that and my thought responds to that and I want to choose to smell that again.

However, once I leave the room that the salad is in and I go outside, I smell cow manure.

And therefore, we try to do away with with one aspect and try to go back and achieve

a previous experience that we've had before.

Now why does thought think that it can achieve complete, satisfaction?

The actual fact of life is its wholeness.

It contains both of the opposites, satisfaction and dissatisfaction, yet through countless

training, our minds have been trained to believe that we can pursue Happiness, Truth, Enlightenment

and we can achieve that, that there is some sort of way the past can come to this permanent,

complete State of Bliss, of Happiness, we call it many different things, but I feel

that everything that we have contributed in this society, everything that we do, is against

this fact of life, that every "thing" contains everything.

So therefore, if we desire or if we want to choose one thing, in that has both the satisfaction

and dissatisfaction… any direction we choose.

So therefore, is it a matter of making the right choice or not?

Is it a matter of going back thinking, "I should have done this or I should not have

done that."

How can the process, which is always unfinished, incomplete...

How can that ever completely know what was the right decision, what was the right choice?

Or if I'm going to make the right decision or the right choice now?

Can it ever completely know?

Being limited down to my particular human body and my range of sensory perceptions...

How can that incomplete tool or mechanism have the complete answer?

There are scientists who are always gathering data and they're always gathering, gathering,

gathering data in order to come to a complete conclusion, but they never do.

They just get tired of collecting data, data and data over time, that they just give up

and stop wherever they are, but it's always limited.

There's always more data to acquire, to gather.

So every choice we come to inevitably becomes something that requires more choices, more

decisions and those choices/decisions we come to require more and more because thought,

always being unfinished, incomplete... is inherently missing something and we desire

this full completeness.

We desire to fill up this missingness.

So we are once again caught in the cycle of trying to make the right choice, choosing

more and more again and again.

So that's all I wanted to talk about in this video when it comes to choiceless awareness.

Thank you all for watching and listening and I'll see you all next time, bye.

For more infomation >> What Is Choiceless Awareness? | J. Krishnamurti - Duration: 10:18.

-------------------------------------------

What If Cloverfield Was Real? - Duration: 4:31.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey.

With the release of The Cloverfield Paradox last month, we received even more insight

into the Cloverfield situation.

While much of it remains in mystery, we now understand the circumstances around it somewhat

more.

That, however, does not make it any less terrifying; if we were suddenly attacked by giant monsters,

the world would be in trouble.

How much trouble?

Let's explore.

If you want more What If videos, check out our "Biggest What Ifs" playlist on the

channel.

Now get ready, it's time to ask the question: What if Cloverfield was Real?

To clarify, this video will take into account events and circumstances surrounding the original

Cloverfield movie as well as 10 Cloverfield Lane and the Cloverfield Paradox, as they

are all related.

However, it will focus largely on the monster from the original movie.

And in case it wasn't blatantly obvious, this video will have spoilers.

First let's very briefly get everyone up to date.

Cloverfield takes place in 2008, and tells the story of the attack of a giant monster

that surfaced from the bottom of the ocean.

This monster, nicknamed Clover, laid waste to New York City alongside the dog-sized parasites

whose bites caused their victim to explode.

Needless to say, this was a terrifying experience.

In Cloverfield Paradox, which took place in 2028, Tagruato, a Japanese mining company,

was developing a new technology that could result in essentially infinite energy.

This Shepard Particle Accelerator was 1000 times more powerful than previous ones, making

some nervous that it could have dangerous side effects.

As it happens, they were right to be nervous, since the machine ended up causing a split

in the fabric of spacetime.

This caused monsters from other dimensions to attack the Earth, with some attacking it

20 years previously, thus causing the events seen in Cloverfield in 2008, Cloverfield Lane

in 2016, and Paradox in 2028, simultaneously.

So, what would happen if this happened in real life?

How might humanity react?

Well, Clover was incredibly powerful, both strong and highly resistant to damage.

It took a great deal of military power, and the destruction of New York City, to take

it down.

If it did appear, humanity would likely react in a similar way.

There would be hysteria in the area it surfaced, military would be called in, and we would

try to take it out as quickly as possible.

Eventually, there's a good chance that we would choose to nuke the area to keep Clover

and its parasites from spreading.

You may recall this tactic from our video "What if Cthulhu was Real".

However, unlike with Cthulhu, this would likely be effective, at least in trying to destroy

the beast itself.

While some doubted that the beast was dead, it was confirmed by J.J. Abrams that it had

been killed.

However, the parasites would likely be even more successful at killing than Clover, with

roughly 2000 of them going out in search of food.

There's a good chance that even if we were able to kill Clover, many of the parasites

would survive, and could potentially even breed and become more numerous.

If the parasites weren't exterminated, there's a chance that they could pose a significant

threat to humanity, particularly if they're able to breed as quickly as other parasites

we know like mosquitos.

So, if we were up against Clover, humanity would take some damage, but we would likely

be able to defeat it with the weapons we have available, even if some parasites may have

survived.

But it gets worse.

How?

It turns out that this creature was barely an infant.

Considering an entire city was destroyed to defeat a baby, if we were up against a fully-grown

version, it's difficult to imagine us surviving.

We might see beasts as large as the one seen at the end of Cloverfield Paradox, whose head

reached past the clouds.

And chances are, it would take more than a few bombs to take out that thing.

This brings up another point that should be stressed: each of these films takes place

in alternate dimensions.

While the Earth is largely the same in many versions of the multiverse, the effects of

the spacetime rupture affect each world differently.

This means that it could be that we could face completely different obstacles, possibly

ones not seen in the films.

Maybe we would see a zombie apocalypse, and have to fight off a zombie horde composed

of our own.

Maybe we ourselves would be the invaders.

Heck, it could be that we would meet a benevolent group of beings, and it could actually improve

life on Earth.

With so many options in a multiverse, the sky would be the limit.

And now we return to our question: What if Cloverfield was Real?

Well, if we faced a monster or monsters similar to those seen in the films, the Earth would

be in a good deal of trouble.

Even with a baby like Clover, it would take great sacrifice to take it down.

If it was larger or there were more of them, we might be doomed, particularly if the parasites

began to reproduce.

However, since we don't know where we stand in the multiverse, it could even be that we

would face completely different things not seen in the movies.

However, I don't know about you, but I'd much prefer it if this stuff stayed in the

cinema.

Thank you for watching Life's Biggest Questions, I hope this was interesting and informative,

and maybe even inspired you to look into it further on your own.

If you liked this video, please thumbs up and subscribe to the channel down below.

While you're down there, let me know what you would do if this movie came to life.

Until next time, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey with Life's Biggest Questions, wishing you

the best of luck, on your quest for answers.

One particularly significant revelation this brings us is that we would never know when

it would happen, since it occurred before

However, let's assume that we were up against a monster similar to Clover from the original

film.

For more infomation >> What If Cloverfield Was Real? - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

What Would You Do if There Was a Child Right in Front of You? - Duration: 0:10.

For more infomation >> What Would You Do if There Was a Child Right in Front of You? - Duration: 0:10.

-------------------------------------------

Man Utd news: What Jose Mourinho was REALLY writing in his notepad against Liverpool - Duration: 2:18.

Man Utd news: What Jose Mourinho was REALLY writing in his notepad against Liverpool

A first-half double from Marcus Rashford ensured the Red Devils took all three points away from Old Trafford. And master tactician Mourinho was hard at work on the sidelines throughout the weekends early kick off.

Sky Sports cameras twice captured the Portuguese coach writing in his notepad. And a close up shot has revealed exactly what Mourinho was thinking.

Despite the former Chelsea boss very messy handwriting, it can be seen that he wrote 2nd ball in the first sentence.

And the word Rom can be deciphered in the second part of the message, referring to United forward Romelu Lukaku. However, the rest of the note is hastily scribbled and far too messy to be worked out.

Mourinho is making a habit of writing notes for his players during a match. Midway through Uniteds 2-1 win over Chelsea last month, the Red Devils boss cheekily passed an instruction to midfielder Nemanja Matic.

  In typical Mourinho fashion, his side won in uninspiring style against Liverpool. And the managers tactics have once again been called into question by the media.

But speaking after the crucial win, Mourinho said: We can split the halves - United first half and Liverpool second but in my opinion our first half was a half with goals and danger.

In the second half - in my opinion, and probably the people in the studio have a different opinion - was Liverpool controlling with the ball and United controlling without the ball. Our team was always in control.

Even in set pieces, corners, dangerous situations we were in control so I think we deserved it..