Auto news on Youtube Mar 10 2018

If Jesus really was God, what should he have said while he was here on Earth?

For the past 2,000 years, Christianity has been plagued by problems that Jesus would

have known about, if he was all-knowing, omniscient God.

These include plagues, persecutions of Christians by other Christians, holy wars, crusades,

the Dark Ages, Bad kings and corrupt church leaders, slavery, witch hunts, persecutions

of Jews, embarrassing scientific errors, and even today, Christianity is split into thousands

of different denominations.

It was Jesus himself who, according to the Bible, said that you will know them by their

fruits.

And Christianity has borne a lot of very bad fruit.

It fails Jesus' own "fruits test".

In the Bible, Jesus appears to have no idea about the catastrophic future failures of

future Christianity, nor did he ever give a single hint of commands that would have

avoided these failures.

Certainly Jesus did say some things that we would expect him to say if he really was God.

For example, he did say that he was God, and that he would rise from the dead and return

in glory.

But anyone could have made those claims.

If Jesus was really all-knowing, omniscient God, he would have known about those future

failures of Christianity and said things to prevent them.

Instead, Jesus felt that it was important to tell his future followers to cut off parts

of their bodies, that demons caused epilepsy and mental illness, that women were adulterers

if they divorced abusive husbands, and he even suggested that people walk on poisonous

snakes!

There are many simple things that Jesus could have said that would have discouraged his

future followers from doing such terrible things.

Here are a few suggestions.

Let's start with persecution.

Ever since Constantine, 1700 years ago, Christians have committed enormous atrocities in the

name of Christ.

Millions of innocent people have been murdered, tortured, forced out of their homes and impoverished

because they sincerely disagreed with the Christian beliefs of their Christian persecutors,

or just because they were at the wrong place at the wrong time.

Why didn't Jesus say, You shall not persecute anyone because of what they believe about

me, no matter how much you disagree with their beliefs.

Jesus is omnipotent, so if he wanted someone tortured on the rack, burned at the stake,

drowned, defeated in a holy war, or hung by their neck until their neck breaks or they

suffocate, could have said that he was perfectly capable of doing all of that without his followers

help.

but he never did.

Slavery is one of the cruelest forms of oppression and exploitation, and it remained common in

Christian nations even in modern times.

But Jesus never said, Do NOT enslave anyone.

EVER.

Jesus never said that.

Next, if he was a loving God, Jesus would have surely known that Christians would suffer

for most of the next 2,000 years under bad kings and corrupt church leadership.

Today, we know that a fundamental right is to elect our own leaders, in government and

in church, although the largest church denominations, such as Catholic and Eastern Orthodox, still

deny their followers the right to elect their church leaders.

The very idea of a democracy, a republic, or any form of elected government is completely

missing from the Bible.

The Bible had many opportunities for God to tell his followers to elect their leaders,

but he never did.

Kings and priests were chosen by God, then all of that power and wealth went to their

descendants.

The church, as well as governments of Christian nations, followed this example.

Jesus supported this corrupt system.

He even praised a widow who gave everything she had to corrupt, un-elected, hereditary

temple priests.

Jesus could have easily said, "You have the right to democracy in church and civil

government".

But he did not.

If Jesus was God, he would also have known that many millions of Christian spouses and

children would suffer physical and sexual abuse from their spouses or parents, and that

divorce was often the only way to stop this abuse.

But what did he say?

"everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit

adultery", "What God has joined together, let no man separate" no matter how violent

or dangerous the abuse becomes.

Jesus could have said that, if someone abuses their spouse or children, the non-abusing

spouse has the right to divorce them and get custody of their children and it is NOT a

sin.

But Jesus did not say that.

Christianity is split into literally thousands of denominations, each one claiming that they

are right and every other Christian denomination is wrong.

Jesus promised that the Holy Spirit would teach his followers, which means that they

should all agree, but they still disagree with each other.

One huge part of this problem is that all of the ancient Bible manuscripts disagree

with each other, and the vast majority of them are from over a thousand years after

Christ is believed to have lived.

Another part of this problem is that different translators cannot agree on how to translate

the Bible.

There is, of course, a very easy way for all-powerful God to fix this.

Christians believe that Jesus inspired a perfect Bible.

He could also have promised to inspire perfect copies and perfect translations.

But he did not.

Now, let's move on to the embarrassing and humbling fact that the Earth is not the center

of the universe.

Although It's true that modern Christians do not believe that the Bible says that the

Earth is the center of the universe.

ancient, medieval and Renaissance Christians certainly did.

This includes the Catholic church, who almost killed Galileo because of it, it also includes

widely respected Protestant theologians like John Calvin and Martin Luther.

It would have saved his greatest theologians a lot of embarrassment if Jesus had just told

us that the Earth orbits the sun, but he didn't.

Now, Let's talk about some more science, much closer to home.

Until the development of modern medicine, plagues often swept through cities and entire

nations, killing millions of people.

Let's take just one example, smallpox.

Smallpox has been killing people for at least 3,000 years.

It killed 20% - 60% of everyone it infected, and killed 80% of the children that it infected.

It killed 40 million Europeans in the 18th century alone, and in the twentieth century,

it killed between 300 million and 500 million people.

The church's response was to dedicate a saint, Saint Nicasius, to smallpox victims

and build a cathedral named after him.

There are actually two different ways to prevent smallpox, which could have been done with

ancient technology, if they had only known about them.

These are variolation and vaccination.

But Jesus did not say anything about them, even though this knowledge would have prevented

literally hundreds of millions, probably billions of unnecessary, horribly painful, deaths.

Let's move on to the belief that demons cause epilepsy and mental illness.

This is a very common theme in the Gospels, which claim 23 times that Jesus and his disciples

cast demons out of people.

This led to almost 1,700 years of incorrect diagnosis and mistreatment of people who were

physically or mentally ill.

But Jesus never said that seizures and mental illnesses were NOT caused by demons.

Nor did he ever tell us not to mistreat people who had these illnesses.

If Jesus really was all-knowing, loving, omniscient God, why did he not say a single one of these

common sense things that would have made enormous improvements in the lives of billions of people,

and prevented his church from making enormous, very embarrassing and destructive mistakes,

and prevented horrible human suffering?

A better question might be, since Jesus gave no hint that he knew about all of these problems

that future Christians would face, was Jesus really God?

What else do you think Jesus should have said?

I've provided eight things.

I'm sure you can think of some more.

I look forward to reading your answers in the YouTube comments section.

Thank you for watching our video.

For more interesting information about Christianity, please visit our web site, Freethinkers Books

Dot com.

If you liked our video, please click the YouTube Like icon, subscribe to our YouTube channel

and share our video with your friends.

Thanks again.

For more infomation >> If Jesus Christ was really God, what should he have said? - Duration: 10:21.

-------------------------------------------

Oh Yeon Seo Describes What It Was Like Working With Lee Seung Gi On "Hwayugi"(News) - Duration: 3:18.

Oh Yeon Seo Describes What It Was Like Working With Lee Seung Gi On "Hwayugi"

During a recent interview, Oh Yeon Seo shared her experience filming tvNs Hwayugi and working with co-star Lee Seung Gi.

In the drama, Oh Yeon Seo and Lee Seung Gi played a loving couple as Jin Sun Mi and Son Oh Gong respectively. Comparatively, the two actors interact in a strange manner in real life, according to Oh Yeon Seo.

She revealed, I was born in 1987 and Seung Gi was born at the beginning of 1987.

We probably would have been more comfortable had we met at school, but because we met in a business setting, we have a peculiar relationship where we refer to each other formally and use a mix of casual and formal speech.. Soompi. Display. News. English.

300x250. Mobile. English. 300x250. ATF.

Hes a passionate and zealous person. He works really hard on set, Oh Yeon Seo complimented. Oh Gong from Hwayugi really isnt an easy character to play. However, he always kept a smile on his face and tried to make things fun.

Even though he had a lot of things he was doing in his schedule, he tried to create a bright and positive atmosphere on set. She also explained how he was very considerate of everyone, especially the actresses, adding, I received a lot of Oh Gongs love while filming..

Oh Yeon Seo shared what it was like working in such cold conditions as well. She commented, This past winter was just so, so, so cold.

Seung Gi wears a fur coat [in Hwayugi] but its not warm at all even though it looks huge.

It also became smaller as time went on. The actress recalled how Lee Seung Gi would say that the cold was nothing compared to what he experienced in the military, but he later acknowledged that it was still pretty cold.

He didnt even wear long underwear. I would layer clothing even if I looked larger because it was so cold, Oh Yeon Seo commented.

When I asked Seung Gi how he could withstand the cold, he told me, I went to the army. On rare days, he did wear some [long underwear] saying it was too cold, but you can count the number of times he did on one hand.

I think hes really amazing.. Check out Oh Yeon Seo and Lee Seung Gi in Hwayugi below!. Top Photo Credit: Xportsnews.

For more infomation >> Oh Yeon Seo Describes What It Was Like Working With Lee Seung Gi On "Hwayugi"(News) - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

What Is An Academic Musician? - Duration: 7:51.

hey, welcome to 12tone!

I am an academic musician, and I think there's a lot of confusion about what that term means.

a lot of people seem to think we're just like normal musicians but somehow smarter, but

in reality many of us don't play in bands, have albums, or even necessarily write or

perform music.

now, normally in a video like this I'd just start talking about the concept in abstract

terms, but this time I can do you one better, because last week I was invited to give a

talk at the University of South Carolina's conference on Public Music Discourse in honor

of Leonard Bernstein's centenary.

I'll talk about bit about my presentation at the end, but while I was there I got to

ask a bunch of attendees to describe their work in their own words, so without further

ado, here's some of the things that academic musicians are actually doing.

<Dr Daniel Jenkins>: My research right now focuses on what I call public music theory.

I got interested in this through the composer Arnold Schoenberg.

Most of us, if we know about Schoenberg, know about his development of the 12 tone method

of composition, but actually, Schoenberg was really dedicated about communicating to a

general audience about his music and so through working on him, I'm thinking, well, who

else has been dedicated to communicating to a general audience, and that took me to Leonard

Bernstein, of course, but many many other people, and that lead me to think about media

and other venues and ways that we can bring greater musical understanding to as wide of

an audience as possible

<Dr. Kristin Wendland>: I'm working on a couple of projects right now, I'm wrapping

up one, that actually I've been working on for fifteen years on Argentine tango music,

and I fell in love with it through the dance, and I started studying the scores, I wanted

to make arrangements, how does the music work?

I wanted that passion about it, I wanted to bring it out into the world, and so I teach

a tango course, on the history and culture, and then also the performance practices of

the music, and then my book, Tracing Tangueros: Argentine Tango Music just came out, all about

the instrumental music.

And then I'm working on a new project right now on the intersections of music and yoga,

mostly through the lense of Yehudi Menuhin, who was a fantastic child prodigy virtuoso,

and he intersected with Yoga and brought it into his teaching and into his life practice,

so that's my newer project.

<David John Baker>: I primarily do music cognition, which is sort of a split between music psychology

and computational musicology, and I'm really interested in how you can sort of use tools

of computational musicology and sort of the frameworks from cognitive psychology to better

inform how people learn melodies, which you do, of course, if you're doing aural skills

classes or something like that, it's really important to know what types of mechanisms

lead to that and how you actually model that in terms of building a statistical model of that.

<Dr. Rachel Short>: I call my work choreo-musical analysis, analyzing not just the music and

phrase lengths and accents and that, but also looking at the choreography and how motions

in the choreography inter-react with what's in the music.

<Dr. Timothy A. Johnson>: some of my research is on music in baseball, and I've given

several talks at the baseball hall of fame and other venues like that.

I've talked about Charles Ives' music in baseball, and I've also spoken about

Take Me Out to the Ball Game and other baseball tunes.

More recently, I've done some work on music that's played at the ball parks such as

the music that players select as they walk up to the plate to bat or enter a game to pitch

My work on Charles Ives in baseball turned into a book that was given an award by the

society for american baseball research.

<Miriam Piilonen>: So I'm a Ph.D. candidate in music theory at Northwestern University,

and my primary research thinks about 19th century evolutionary theories of music, and

I'm interested in the ways that the limits and potentials of the human become entwined

with basically like the structures of music and these theories, but aside from my primary

research, I run a humor twitter account called @darkmusictheory, where I just retweet complaints

about music theory and there are a lot of complaints about music theory which is what

I teach, and I find them really interesting because they seem to index this collective

sense of the difficulty, mundaneness, arbitrariness of music theory, whether this is justified

or not, and I'm interested in using these tweets to create a collective catharsis for

people who struggle in music theory, and also just to think about the reasons why students

seem to struggle with music theory.

<Dr. Garrett Schumann>: Hi, so I'm a composer and I'm a scholar of music who studies heavy

metal music, and then I also run a nonprofit concert-presenting organization that puts

on concerts all across Michigan, and I enjoy all three of these streams, they keep me really

engaged with thinking about music in interesting ways, creating music in interesting ways and

then sharing it with the people around me.

<Becky Troyer>: Alright, so my name's Becky and I have a Youtube channel teaching post-tonal music theory

So I did my master's at Florida State, and I'm looking to do a Ph.D. in music theory

in the future, what I'm really passionate about is history of theory, early music, so

the medieval period, the renaissance period, and also post-tonal 20th century contemporary

music, and maybe one day finding the intersection between the two, especially with rhythm and

meter and metrical dissonance, things like that.

I'm an oboist so I wrote a piece, or I wrote a paper about this piece called six metamorphoses

after Ovid that kind of brings in classical mythology sources as well as these solo oboe

stories from these different mythological figures, and so I like telling stories as

well in music, and finding different ways of intersecting those things

<Dr. Michael Baker>: The class that I'm currently developing for this semester is

a class on music and interdisciplinary studies, where I would be the host professor that teaches

the class and then each week I would bring a guest from the university faculty and then

the two of us would team teach the class together for my students in the class, where I would

be the music expert and then one week we would bring in the linguistics professor and the

two of us would share ideas together and develop lesson plans and work together with our students.

and that's just a small taste of all the awesome presentations at the conference.

some of my favorite talks that I didn't get an interview with included a study on how

non-musicians describe music, a look at Marion Bauer's work as a female composer and musicologist

in the early 20th century, a class project where music majors taught post-tonal composition

to retirement home residents, and a discussion of the role of concert programs in understanding

the culture of post-war Poland.

I also met a couple other music theory channels: you saw Becky Troyer in the interviews, who

runs Music Theory Studio, a similar hand-drawn channel that explains post-tonal music, and

I also met Richard Atkinson, who focuses on analyzing counterpoint.

there's links in the description to their channels as well as Miriam's twitter account

for music theory complaints, Doctor Johnson's book on music and baseball and Doctor Wendland's

book on tango.

as for me, my talk had the fancy-sounding title "Communicating Music Theory Through

Online Video" and it focused on, well, that.

I talked about some of the challenges that youtube educators face, including the lack

of a consistent student body which prevents us from really building curriculums, as well

as the difficulty of using important teaching tools like repetition and challenge.

I also looked at some of the solutions I used, including developing short, ready-made explanations

for common topics and setting my goals to best utilize the tools I do have.

plus I gave some tips for getting started in the educational video world, like learning

from the people who are already doing it well, and leading with personality and passion.

the talk was streamed live, but unfortunately it's not published online yet.

Doctor Jenkins, the conference organizer, is looking into fixing that, and if he does

I'll post the link on twitter if you want to check it out, so follow me there if you

want to see it.

or if you just want to see what I look like.

I know a lot of you do.

anyway, thanks for watching, and thanks to our Patreon patrons for supporting us and

making these videos possible.

if you want to help out, and get some sweet perks like sneak peeks of upcoming episodes,

there's a link to our Patreon on screen now.

you can also join our mailing list to find out about new episodes, like, share, comment,

subscribe, and above all, keep on rockin'.

For more infomation >> What Is An Academic Musician? - Duration: 7:51.

-------------------------------------------

What if money was no object? Every person on the planet should watch this video. - Duration: 3:04.

What do you desire?

What makes you itch?

What sort of a situation would you like?

Let's suppose...

I do this often in vocational guidance of students.

They come to me and say,

"Well, uhm... we're getting out of college

and we haven't the faintest idea what we want to do."

So I always ask the question:

"What would you like to do if money were no object?"

How would you really enjoy spending your life?

Well, it's so amazing.

As a result of our kind of educational system,

crowds of students say,

"Well, we'd like to be painters,

we'd like to be poets,

we'd like to be writers,

but as everybody knows, you can't earn any money that way."

Or another person says,

"Well, I'd like to live an out-of-doors life and ride horses."

I say, "Do you want to teach in a riding school?"

Ah... let's go through with it.

What do you want to do?

When we finally got down to something,

which the individual says he really wants to do,

I will say to him, "You do that...

and, ah...

forget the money."

Ah, because...

if you say that getting the money is the most important thing,

you will spend your life completely wasting your time.

You'll be doing things you don't like doing in order to go on living.

That is, to go on doing things you don't like doing.

Which is stupid.

Better to have a short life that is full of what you like doing

than a long life spent in a miserable way.

And after all, if you do really like what you're doing,

it doesn't matter what it is,

you can eventually turn it, ah...

You could eventually become a master of it.

It's the only way to become a master of something,

to be really with it.

And then, you'll be able to get a good fee for whatever it is.

So don't worry too much, that's ah...

Everybody's... somebody's interested in everything.

And anything you can be interested in you'll find others who are.

But it's absolutely stupid

to spend your time doing things you don't like

in order to go on spending things you don't like

and doing things you don't like

and to teach your children to follow in the same track.

See, what we're doing

is we're bringing up children and educating them

to live the same sort of lives we're living,

in order that there would...

they may justify themselves and find satisfaction in life

by bringing up their children to bring up their children

to do the same things.

So it's all retch and no vomit.

It never gets there.

And so...

therefore, it's so important to consider this question:

"What do I desire?"

For more infomation >> What if money was no object? Every person on the planet should watch this video. - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

Sungurlar PARTY MERT Now what is it! - Duration: 3:53.

Sungurlar, the first part of the action, military, drama and crime series published on October

25, 2014.  Compassion is the continuation of the Peak

sequence. From the Turksat publication of the Milky Way Media Foundation channels

 due to the removal of the directory has been terminated.

Mert Kılıç Sungurlar's name and role in the series is like Serdar Mert Mert, the gentleman

 and he is a warrior enough to give up his life for his homeland. He is a faithful.

He lost his family but his only brother was alive and he found him in 33

and a calm person is seen but the opposite is very scary. Nazaya or Meryem is in love

with her I have not decided on marriage with Nazay

in the 34th chapter. After the events of July 15th, we could not

see it because of the closing of the Milky Way TV.

Captain Serdar Mertin real name Mert Kılıç under his rebellious image

what you have to see is that you will be surprised.Sword, Van Sport before the modeling professional,

 Edirne Sports and Tekirdağ Spor played football in 2002. Best Photomodel was selected

in 2002. She studied acting at the Beverly Hills Acting

School in Los Angeles, USA  The sword is 1.91. Actor stepping into Milky

Way TV screens with Compassion Taffle  He has also starred in several lines. On

June 9, 2013, Aslıhan Güner married. Yaman developed,

yesterday is the calendar on the next one it entered the form of the next page.

So what is now Captain Serdar Mert in the sungurlar line?

The Sungurlar seems to have made quite a navel for the sword that was pulled up after the

sequence. In the year 2017, the face of CcNTurk gave

him a lot of difficulty Sungurlar after the handsets attracted to

the handsome player, now his wife Aslıhan Günere

She's been training acting and coaching her. She's been in her 4 years,

they are very tied up, they can say to them, Mert is my woman,

you may be a bit confused, like a woman of calmness.

In their spare time, where are their heads? they are going there right away.

They are living abroad and crazy and crazy. to be a proprietor, but because of the extreme

work of the original case, In fact, he wants a child but the projects

are very busy.  Mert and his wife Aslıhan's biggest dream

is to open a soup kitchen. they are very much in love with me.

they love it very much and they continue to be nice to their lives. We wish happiness

in their lives.

For more infomation >> Sungurlar PARTY MERT Now what is it! - Duration: 3:53.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Earth Was Made Of Lego? - Duration: 4:23.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey.

Lego was a staple of many a childhood.

Kids everywhere, myself included, have spent hours upon hours building amazing structures

with these tiny bricks.

More recently, the Lego movies and games have taken the world by storm, giving us a glimpse

into a world of Lego.

But what if our world was entirely made up of the stuff?

Besides the obvious jokes about the pain of constantly stepping on Lego, there is a lot

about the world that would change.

Let's explore these changes.

If you want more What If videos, check out our "Biggest What Ifs" playlist on the

channel.

Now get ready, it's time to ask the question: What if the Earth was Made of Lego?

Now, in researching this video, I came across another video of the same name that did a

good job of explaining why this Lego Earth simply could not exist.

It described a number of potential situations, all of which ended in disaster.

So, this video will take a different perspective.

We'll assume that somehow, the laws of physics decided to take a break, and we found ourselves

on a world identical to our own, except that it is made of Lego.

What changes might we see?

Would the world of plastic be fantastic?

Would everything, in fact, be awesome?

Well, one factor that would be rather important is whether or not we would change alongside

the earth.

If we biological humans suddenly found ourselves on a planet made of plastic, it would throw

everything out of whack.

With all the water turned into Lego, all life, which requires water, would die, including

us.

Unsurprisingly, we would not be well-suited for a Lego world.

But what if everything on earth also turned to Lego, becoming similar to the world found

in the Lego Movie?

What if all the plants, animals, buildings, and people all turned into Lego as well?

First of all, there would be the question of biological functions.

Would our new Lego bodies need to carry out these functions?

Would they even be capable of it?

It seems that if we were turned to Lego, we probably wouldn't need to do things like

eating, sleeping, or, ya know, making number 2.

On this topic, it's likely that we wouldn't age.

In the Lego media, it does seem that people age and die, but if we were all made of plastic,

it seems more likely that we wouldn't face the same lifespan issues as biological organisms.

This could bring about overpopulation… except for one very unfortunate problem.

Lego pieces don't have genitals.

This means that we could rub our plastic bodies against each other as vigorously and erotically

as we wanted, but may not be able to actually reproduce.

This would likely lead to a fairly static society, since there wouldn't be new generations

to change things up and bring new perspectives to the forefront.

Not to mention, there would be an awful lot of crestfallen people wandering around aimlessly,

staring down at their flat bodies.

Another question is that of how the ground would look.

If the ground had the little lego bumps all over it, this could get pretty annoying.

We would need to carefully walk around in order to avoid stepping on one of the holes,

since our feet would become stuck and take some effort to remove them.

This brings us to another point.

Depending on the ease with which one could detach and reattach the Lego, it could be

that the world would be incredibly modular.

Having a party?

Rearrange your bed into a bunch of chairs for all your guests.

Tearing down a building?

Why do that when you can just rearrange the parts into something new?

When anything can be turned into anything else, recycling old materials becomes much

easier and more profitable.

You could even trade arms, legs, or even heads with your friend if you wanted to.

Unfortunately, this could have a downside as well.

If you didn't properly seal your house or personal belongings, criminals could potentially

just take apart your things and steal them bit by bit.

It would be quite the bummer to wake up and learn that a thief had run off with your garage.

It could even be that people would strive to manipulate the plastic to make materials

with different characteristics.

Maybe they would condense some to build buildings, so that they wouldn't be able to be damaged

as easily.

Maybe some would be made more pliable, allowing for more flexible items.

This idea could run into problems, though, if fire itself was plastic, and unable to

heat things.

Sadly, it's difficult to predict physics in an already impossible world.

And now we return to our question: What if the Earth was Made of Lego?

Well, if we didn't turn into lego ourselves, our time on the new Lego Earth would be rather

limited.

With nothing to eat or drink, we'd quickly die off, along with other life on the planet.

However, if everything changed to Lego, we would find ourselves in a very different world.

Biological functions could disappear, reproduction might go by the wayside, and a walk to the

park could find you with one foot stuck in the ground for hours.

On the bright side, it would allow us to better recycle materials, and could allow us to live

forever, but that's a tradeoff not everyone would be willing to make.

Thank you for watching Life's Biggest Questions, I hope this was interesting and informative,

and maybe even inspired you to look into it further on your own.

If you liked this video, please thumbs up and subscribe to the channel down below.

While you're down there, let me know what you would do if the earth suddenly changed

to LEGO.

Until next time, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey with Life's Biggest Questions, wishing you

the best of luck, on your quest for answers.

On the other hand, however, it could be that, along with the magic causing the earth and

life on it to be Lego, the same magic could cause these biological functions to persist,

causing us to age, die, and yes, get it on.

but given the magical rules we've already established, it could be that things like

fire and water still held their usual properties.

On the other hand, it could be that this Lego world would continue to involve all the same

things as the previous natural world.

We might eat lego food, sleep on lego beds, and yes, poop out little lego poops.