Thứ Sáu, 8 tháng 2, 2019

Auto news on Youtube Feb 8 2019

let's start with the ongoing talks between North Korea and the United

States the two countries are into their third day of working-level talks in

Pyongyang to prepare for their second summit between their leaders the envoys

are working to find common ground to form the basis of a deal as well as

sorting out logistics and other details Packaging starts us off day three of

nuclear talks between North Korea and the u.s. in Pyongyang the US Special

Representative for North Korea stiffen vegan is negotiating with his new North

Korean counterpart Kim Akhtar the former ambassador to Spain about

what would presumably be an ideal sign at the next summits they're aiming to

define the steps that North Korea needs to take towards denuclearization for

which the US would offer corresponding measures and that will lay the

groundwork for the two leaders joint statement the North Korea's mantle is

petroleum and uranium enrichment facilities including the younger nuclear

complex and it could also offer to destroy its ICBMs in return the US could

offer to set up a joint liaison office in Pyongyang declare an end to the

Korean War and provide humanitarian assistance but the key would be the

removal of economic sanctions the negotiators are also likely finalizing

the venue for the Kim Trump summits president Trump has announced a summit

state and general location Vietnam but he did not elaborate on whether will be

in the city of Hanoi or denaun and because theirs does still three weeks to

go on Toto leaders meet the two sides are also likely sorting out the general

logistics it's unclear how long beacon will stay in the North Korean capital

the negotiations have already been extended from the one-day announced by

the State Department because it's key to come up with a clear set of agreements

to ensure a successful meeting the discussions could even continue into the

weekend and according to an official at Seoul's foreign ministry began as

promised to share the results of his Pyongyang visit with the South Korean

government first that would likely mean briefing at South Korean counterpart

Edelen packagin our young

For more infomation >> N. Korea, U.S. finalizing details for upcoming second summit - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

10+ Incredible Facts About the U.S. Navy SEALs - Duration: 12:48.

So we are on FTD facts most of you viewers have noticed that we've been learning about many different organizations and

militaries from around the world

I've talked about how much power certain countries have like the European countries and have also looked at their Special Forces Air Forces and different

Departments within these militaries. However today I figured we'd take a look at the world famous group

That is across the pond from our regular viewers in

Southeast Asia or in Europe and look at the Navy SEALs from the United States of America and understand not only its history

But some unique facts about them. Hey everybody. How's it going?

Welcome to FTD facts the channel where I look at people cultures some places and military divisions and stuff from all around the world

I'm Dave Walpole and one of the questions that I really want to ask first when it comes to the Navy SEALs is are the

Navy SEALs a special forces unit or more identified as frogmen well

Theoretically both and as a matter of fact if you're unfamiliar with the frogmen term most frogmen groups

which are experts in diving and underwater missions are generally classified as Special Forces units and

Especially when it comes to the United States Navy SEALs

They pretty much came from the frogmen groups from the Second World War and with that in mind

We got to go way back to the Second World War as a matter of fact, August 15

1942 to be exact this was the date that the army organized what is known as the

Amphibious scout and Rader school and was located in Fort Pierce, Florida

Now this was a small

Group where the soldiers that were a part of it came from different divisions of the Navy and it was at that time they began

Training at the amphibious training base in Little Creek, Virginia

now one of the first major

Important individuals that I should talk about is Phillip H of buck Lou Philip H buck lou served in the first amphibians

And was considered the father of US Special naval warfare

This was because fours efforts in the European theater as an amphibious troop

He was granted two decorations of the Navy Cross

Which is the second highest achievement one can get so one of the very first

operations of this new amphibious group was during Operation Torch

which was an operation that happened in between November 8th and 16th of 1942 and

Carried out in French Morocco and French Algeria side note with Operation Torch. This was also the very first major

Involvement with the United States in the North African and even European theater and on top of that it was also the first major

airborne assault conducted by the United States of America and besides the amphibious Scout and Raiders

They also had a few other groups that were trained in amphibious assaults. One of the most notable of these was the naval combat

Demolitions unit these were demo experts and they were present throughout all of the war and began in

1942 as a matter of fact

These guys were very important to blowing obstacles and lines on the beaches of Normandy for Operation Overlord as well the father of naval

demolitions originated from this group and that was Lieutenant Commander Draper al

Coffman and he also indeed helped set up this group in the first place on top of that the Office of Strategic Services or the

OSS had themselves a maritime unit as well

And with those three units that I just mentioned they all had their own speciality

You had the naval demolitions who were in charge of obviously demolitions you had Scouts and Raiders who were also really good at

Pathfinding and of course you had the OSS who were really good at intelligence as well

But however one group that really stands out that makes you think of the Navy SEALs to a tee is the underwater

demolitions team known as the UDT

basically after the United States had a major loss during the Battle of Tarawa in November of

1943 the Navy decided to put together this group organized of nine teams of men and their mission very similar to the naval combat

Demolitions team they were in charge of going in ahead and blowing out as many obstacles as they possibly can

Oh, yes, and of course, they were also in charge of recounting the area as well

So when the major forces came in they would know what's ahead of them

but oddly enough although a few of these men came from these Scouts and Raiders programs and other programs in amphibious training a

Big chunk of them were what you call Seabees. Now. What were Seabees they were basically the

Engineers at the sea they knew how to build naval bases

Repair things that sort of thing as a matter of fact throughout the Second World War. They see that there was approximately 300

85,000 Seabees for the Navy but one interesting aspect of the team known as UDT

These guys were considered naked all the time. Okay

I don't mean they were actually naked they were pretty much wearing, you know swim trunks the entire time

This is because throughout the Second World War their behavior broke against what was known as the Fort Pierce

Protocol because of that they ignored their orders to stay in their boat and jumped out in their bathing suits

To survey the area as well

They also operated in broad daylight which was a very uncommon thing and considered a very dangerous thing to do

The reason for this is because they say they'd be able to spot things

underwater a lot easier during the day than at night by the end of the war the UDT had 34 teams in which

two guys usually work together on a coast and I just think it's amazing that these guys were

You know military dudes and they were still just wearing bathing suits, you know

A couple of flippers and of course some goggles and that was pretty much it of course, though

That is just the second world war

That is just a basis of where the Navy SEALs came from because it wasn't until the 60s that the Navy SEALs

Actually formed this was because on May 25th 1961 during. John, f kennedy's very famous. Speech

He mentioned how he was going to invest a hundred million dollars into Special Forces training numbered of a side note

Some people think that John F. Kennedy came up with the whole idea of the Navy SEALs

well

There are another argument that people say the Navy SEALs was an idea that was thought of even as far back as the Korean War

however

You can say because John F Kennedy decided to push more Special Forces training

The Navy SEALs came to be because it was shortly after John F Kennedy

Speech that in 1962 the first two Navy SEAL Teams were formed now

This is where the whole Special Forces team sort of comes in because they were created as a naval counter to the army special forces

Units and although this may not be official but according to the founding SEAL team member known as Roy Boehm

he stated that the very first missions that the SEALs were a part of was in the communist country of Cuba, but however in

1963 the CIA started using the Navy SEALs in

operations in Vietnam

Keep in mind this was well before America even decided to enter the war because that was in 1965

Also a little bit of a side note when it comes to these CIA

missions a lot of them weren't actually really that successful and the only time they became successful is when the Navy SEALs

Got their own

independence and were capable of doing their own missions and it was after that the Navy SEALs started getting the

Reputation of being a quite capable force because when they were under I guess you could say the eye of the CIA

they really weren't doing that well and to give you an idea of how successful and courageous these guys are during the war from

1965 to

1975 the Navy SEALs received one Medal of Honor to Navy crosses

42 Silver Stars four hundred and two Bronze Stars to legions of merit and 352 accommodation medals and

51 Navy achievements as well

They apparently had a kill count of over 2,000 and had only lost

42 to 48 men and to go into some darker history commander Robert J Fay was the first Navy SEAL to lose his life

During Vietnam after a mortar round had struck him and this happened on October 28th

1965 however

The first Navy SEAL to lose his life in combat was Billy machen who was a radar man and he lost his life on

August 16

1966 moon rail on let's look at some of the more modern aspects of the Navy SEALs because quite a lots changed since

Vietnam, of course

firstly the Navy SEALs have actually took part of many different operations from around the world and

Just because they're known as the Navy SEALs doesn't mean they always operate in water

As a matter of fact, they do a lot of land operations as well and including Vietnam

they were a part of Lebanon Desert Storm the Somalia Civil War the

Yugoslav war and of course were in Afghanistan for Operation Enduring Freedom

They were also in Grenada and many anti-piracy missions such as the 1985

Achille Lauro cruise ship hijacking

And of course the Somalia Marist, Alabama hijacking in 2009 and a lot more and yeah

Maybe some of you guys already know that they were a part the mission to take out Osama bin Laden

but what you might not know is they actually built a

One-to-one scale size replica of the house that they were taking and they trained in that house

Every single day a lot of times now. Okay. What does it take to be a Navy SEALs?

Well, let's take a look at some of the requirements for this to get into the Navy SEALs

Not only does one have to be physically fit. But you also got to be mentally fit as well

We don't want any crazies with the guns. They got no. Thank you

First of all, you have to commit and do a 500-yard swimming in 12 minutes and 30 seconds

You also have to do 50 pushups in two minutes 50 sit-ups in two minutes and ten consecutive

Pull-ups in two minutes as well on top of that

There's also a 1.5 mile run that has to be done in less than 10 minutes and 30 seconds

This is during what they call hell weekend. Oh my god. Hell week is just a nightmare

If you go into describe it all of this, of course falls under what they call the buds or the bee

UDS training which is your basic underwater demolition

SEAL training and within this they say the very first phase of the training only

33 percent of the people move on to phase number two and with that there are three different phases

Of the Navy SEAL training which is 24 weeks long this of course does not include the Naval Special Warfare

Preparatory school that is eight weeks and also candidates have to be anywhere between 18 to 29 years old for me. I'm 32

So I'm out. Yeah guys. I know I don't look 32. Yeah

Oh, yeah, put my age guests down there, you know if you guys say 22

I'm gonna feel real good about myself of these first three you got phase 1 which is physical conditioning phase 2 is combat diving and

Phase 3 is land warfare

Of course

It's not over after that because then you got to go on to a three-week parachuting school yikes then of course

There is a 26 week long Navy SEAL qualification program which by the way, I know some of you guys are saying man

There are so many courses

Just to let you know

It's a lot of people that fail during the first phase as a matter of fact all the phases after that

They have a very high succession rate as a matter of for all the groups over

87% of people pass and of course after that there is also

Individual training programs task group training programs and other things like that

and as for the size of this elite force they say there is

approximately two thousand four hundred and fifty

Active-duty seals, which is just about one percent of all of Navy personnel. So thanks for watching guys

That is all the information that I could give you on the Navy SEALs for this video

Which before you guys get out of here? Just let you know if you guys are really loving military topics

Maybe you guys are from the United States and you want more?

Military videos maybe on the army maybe on

Paratroopers or anything like that?

Be sure to give this video a big like because the more likes then I know hey

I should do more of this content. That being said normally here on FTD facts

We do everything in playlists by countries and their militaries

So because this is the first time that we are doing a military video in America

I will have a playlist out for you guys. It just might not be available if it is

It's in the cards or in the description box below or at the end of this video

If not, it might just be a link to some of the other cool Special Forces units and other units from around the world

So feel free to check those out, but thanks for watching guys

I'm Dave wopo hit that subscribe button, and I'll see you guys in the next one. Bye. Bye

So, like I said guys here's some of the great playlists that we have

Especially if you like learning about military groups from around the world, so feel free to check these out other than that

Thanks for stopping by and we'll see you in the next one. Bye

For more infomation >> 10+ Incredible Facts About the U.S. Navy SEALs - Duration: 12:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump, Xi unlikely to meet before March 1st trade deadline: U.S. officials - Duration: 2:10.

now with the rising speculation that US president Donald Trump in Chinese

President seizing pain will meet in Vietnam during the planned at North

Korea US summit Washington actually says that such a meeting is not likely to

happen before the March 1st deadline to reach a trade deal between the two world

powers Eason Jae has more speculation the u.s. president Donald Trump and

Chinese President Xi Jinping will meet in Vietnam was shut down by US officials

on Thursday who say it's unlikely the two leaders will meet before the March

1st deadline said by the two sides to reach a trade deal

however White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow remained optimistic telling

reporters that the leaders of the two economic powerhouses could still meet a

later well the president said number times that he expects to meet with

President Xi on trade when and where is totally up in the air at the moment does

it depend on the meetings this week I wouldn't I wouldn't want to say one way

or another it might you know hopefully the meetings will go well president

Trump on Tuesday during a State of the Union address said any new trade deal

with Beijing must include real structural change to end unfair trade

practice as the US continues to press China to make major reforms Trump has

vowed to increase US tariffs on 200 billion dollars of Chinese imports to 25

percent from the current 10 percent if the two sides cannot reach a deal by

March first watchers say the u.s. does not want to hold talks with China in

Vietnam to show that its focus currently lies on the hotly anticipated second

summit with North Korea they add that any misunderstandings that could arise

from meeting with China in Vietnam could lead to a negative impact on

denuclearization talks with North Korea from the upcoming second summit with

North Korean leader Kim jong-un to the March 1st deadline the next few weeks

will be intense for Trump and his administration

he's NJ Arirang news

For more infomation >> Trump, Xi unlikely to meet before March 1st trade deadline: U.S. officials - Duration: 2:10.

-------------------------------------------

U.S Marines Training FUJI FREEZE (PART 1) - Duration: 11:39.

This is the my son has to go to softball practice and I'm too lazy to change into anything else

What is up, everybody its Daniel here and welcome back to my youtube channel

my name is Daniel Turner and I'm here with my man Chance Phillips and

Today is a special day. Today is Thursday. And today we're gonna be going on a Field Op so

We're gonna be going to Fuji freeze

It's gonna be a mainland Japan and we're going gonna be up in the mountains doing some awesome training shooting 50 CAL.

Doing all kinds of crazy stuff. I just wanted to bring you guys along and let you guys know

How everything's been going. Everything's been going great

For me. I've been really busy with the Marine Corps. You can ask Phillips. It's been very hectic

So I want to bring you guys along on this adventure let y'all see what's up show you all the highlights of the trip

Make sure you subscribe down below because I will be posting more videos about

our verse of the day that we normally do and

more daily life in the Marine Corps type videos where I take you on my life take you on my

You know kind of show you what I do on a day-to-day basis where whether its fitness whether its marine corps

or whether it's you know some inspirational type videos, so

Y'all stay tuned for that. I hope y'all enjoy the rest of this video and

See y'all a little bit

So right now, we are waiting on the HST

Apparently, they're suppose it doesn't have bad weather. So

Yeah

It'll probably be delayed by two hours. So now we're just all hanging out

Got CABELLO,

Myself

ANDERSON, DOWDNEY

Logan, Vogt, and the good ol' Higgs

Magby he just works here, and the NCO'S

So, yeah, that's pretty much it right now and once we get on this boat we will check the back in..

we are FINALLY on the boat everybody

We waited out there for like three hours and now we're just eating MREs standing by waiting on to head out

It's gonna be like a two-day trip. (STOP not moving the camera)

and

yeah, we will everybody's gonna get in but uh

It's gonna be a long ride. they hooked us up with seven MREs

You know what, I mean you get the skittles with the MREs and

checking in is...

we got Higgs

Downey's over there

Crislip, Vogt

So, yeah guys y'all just stay tuned it's gonna be a lot of great things happening so yeah y'all just get ready for that

We are leaving

All right, everybody we finally made it we are finally taking off on our journey to Camp Fuji to go to Fuji freeze

We're gonna be doing all kinds of awesome stuff

Right now they gave us seven MREs to handle for the next two days. So we're gonna be on this boat for two days

Should be a fun trip. Hopefully nobody gets seasick and

Yeah, so if you're not subscribed to my channel right now, make sure you subscribe

I'm gonna be putting out a lot of awesome

Verses of the day I'm gonna be putting out videos about the marine corps

And how life is in the bank or they've got any questions about anything that I do or that happens or anything?

So ever just let me know and I'll be happy to answer for you make a video about it or anything

These are all my friends right here. They're all having a good time taking pictures of

us in embarking right now, so

So yeah

So, um y'all take care

We're gonna have a good time on this boat and probably play some cards eat more MREs and watch movies

So that's what we have to look forward to for the next two days. So

Stay tuned and get ready

What does I everybody stay out here and we just got off the boat

Right there and now we are waiting on the buses and I'm here with commands all boys

We're here. Just waiting and the freezing cold is by 40 degrees with this wind. Chill. And so yeah

I'll give this most about two hours to get here. They say it was supposed to be here at 8 o'clock, but

You always got to prepare for the worst. So

That's what we're doing right now

We're just standing by and we're gonna be heading to Camp Fuji should be like a two and a half hour drive from Tokyo

Y'all stay tuned

Keep it. Stay warm. And yeah, we'll see you on the next one

Alright guys, we finally made it. We are here at Camp Fuji

The mountains like right there outside of our window. We just got done getting our haircuts. We got some protein bars

we got all the necessities water all that from the from the PX the PX is like the little grocery store they have and

Me and Higgins gonna go catch a workout after we hit the chow hall

And we bought that c4 babyyyy you bought some c4

Got a staple got to keep the workout in because all these we're eating so many MREs. We're losing the gains

So you got to find a way to keep the gate so we got protein bars. We got c4 and

We're gonna try to keep the gains. We're out here. Were you supposed to be here for about two weeks?

We're gonna be shooting some weapons and all that. So I'll keep you guys updated with that show you all the full experience

Hopefully I could bring my GoPro out there while we're shooting the 50 cals and all that so

Yeah, that's about it for right now. Probably take out to the gym show your little workout and do all that and

Yeah, so I'll see you guys later. I

Burn it out

You got to burn it out you got to want it and you got to bind it up

Let's go

Wraps up ours our leg workout. We did I'm not in video all of it

I just filmed a little bit of it but we started off with leg extensions from legging stitches. We did we hit the squat rack

We start off with two sets of ten two sets of five and then we try to get a three rep max

three sets of three

That after that we came in here

Yeah, we came in here and then we did four sets of lunges 12 on each leg what you just saw and then we wrapped

It out as much as possible on the squat you do it AMRAP as many reps as possible

And that just that just puts you

it sets a standard for you, you know when you do these as many reps as possible because you know

We do ten

We do five with your three, you know, we've limit ourselves

But when we do em reps you want to see how many reps can you do? How far can you push yourself?

And that's what we try to do

We try to add that AMRAP to our workout

So we can push ourselves beyond every single limit that there is that motivates you guys

I hope y'all get in the gym starts laying yourself

start seeing improvements because

2019 is for those that go out and get it that wraps up our workout

We're gonna head back to the barracks get some protein in us and get all that done and we'll see you guys tomorrow

You

For more infomation >> U.S Marines Training FUJI FREEZE (PART 1) - Duration: 11:39.

-------------------------------------------

Source of Midland Valley High School threats tracked outside of United States - Duration: 2:16.

For more infomation >> Source of Midland Valley High School threats tracked outside of United States - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

1972 D US DIME OFFSET ERROR COIN - $33 Million Dollars in DImes Minted - Duration: 4:23.

Hello all you coin aficionados out there and Welcome to the DC Coin World International Coin Channel

Today we have the 1972 dime from the United States of America

Or the ten cent US coin you can see that it is Franklin Roosevelt facing to the left

It says Liberty here, it says In God We Trust here, it says 1972 here,

with a D above it and then way down underneath there's a J in an S and that

is for John Sinnock who was the designer engraver of this coin now this

particular coin has something of interest to me on it and that is that it

has the letters going off the edge and if we look at this in god we trust' we

see that it actually doesn't really have all of the W on there it kind of does

but you can see it almost goes right off the edge here these coins they made 330

million of these at the Denver Mint you see offsets all the time

this is an offset that has from very little value to no collector's value

but I wanted to take a look at it too just to show you that we have these offsets sometimes

so what I did with this one was I said "man that's the weird offset" So, what's it supposed to look like?

I got out a 1973 and darn if that isn't a little messy on the edge too!!!

so I think you'll find with some of these older coins especially in the 70s and mid 70s

Early to mid seventies that there they're not quite as well struck

they let a lot more of these kinds of messy offset errors out

this 1973 touches also but it has a rim here and you see this 1972 doesn't have the rim so this is

quite offset it's I don't know what it is it's not a millimeter but it's it's

it's offset so then I said well if the 73 isn't any good let's pull out another

one let's look at the 75 and look at his 75 it got crunched up in there and this

one is going off the edge too so this one but of course it has a bigger rim

the this one does too so this one touches the rim in 1975

so this 1975 is slightly offset too so then I said well let's just

pull something out so I can see what it should look like and I pulled out the

1969 so here's a 1969 and you can see how it kind of touches the edge here

just a little bit but there's there could even be a little bit more space

than this and like the modern coins you won't see it almost hardly ever I'd say

we see it touching the edge and be this offset but this is a what it should look

like it should have space here should have a little more space here in space

here for the eye and this is what it this one does look like and so we know

it is offset we know they missed a little bit of the Rays part of the rim

when they did it and made this rim a little bit higher and you can actually

see that it kind of sticks in a little bit here you can actually see some of

the copper sticking out above which it shouldn't do and so the copper actually

is a little bit raised over this but again 330 million were made at the Denver Mint or 33 million dollars worth!

And 430 million made at the Philadelphia Mint

and they they made a lot of what we'd call minor errors

these coins have virtually no value over their 10 cent value

it's a nice coin it's at this point it is 47 years old it has a good kind of

characteristics in the sense that it has letters trying to jump off the edge of the coin

the words are scrunched up but it's still only worth 10 cents

Alright that's all we have today from a DC Coin World International Coin Channel

take a look at all your coins if you have some time put them under

magnification and see what you get but if you have to magnify them chances are

the error isn't worth much feel free to leave any comments in the comment

section and we'd love to have you subscribe to our DC Coin World International Coin Channel

For more infomation >> 1972 D US DIME OFFSET ERROR COIN - $33 Million Dollars in DImes Minted - Duration: 4:23.

-------------------------------------------

Is the U.S. entering a new arms race with Russia? - Duration: 8:42.

AMNA NAWAZ: The Trump administration notified Russia last week that it was withdrawing from

the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, intermediate range nuclear forces agreement,

or INF.

Arms control experts decried the move.

In a moment, Nick Schifrin talks with the State Department's top arms control official,

but, first, Nick has some background.

RONALD REAGAN, President of the United States: We have seen what can be accomplished when

we pull together.

NICK SCHIFRIN: It was 1987 and President Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev laid a

cornerstone of nuclear arms reduction, a treaty that eliminated an entire class of U.S. and

Soviet missiles.

In the 1970s and '80s, the U.S. and Soviet Union deployed mobile nuclear-tipped missiles

to Europe.

Under INF, both sides removed thousands of warheads and destroyed ground-launched missiles

with a range of 300 to 3,400 miles.

But for the last few years, the U.S. says Russia deployed this missile that violates

the INF Treaty.

Russia refused us requests to destroy it, so last week the U.S. suspended its participation.

DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States: While we followed the agreement and the rules

to the letter, Russia repeatedly violated its terms.

NICK SCHIFRIN: But Russia says this U.S. missile defense system could be modified to launch

an offensive missile, and therefore the U.S. is the violator.

Last weekend, Russian President Vladimir Putin also suspended Russia's INF participation,

and this week, the Russian military vowed to develop new ground-launched missiles.

But Russia's not the only U.S. concern.

U.S. officials say China and Iran each have more than 1,000 medium-range missiles.

DONALD TRUMP: Perhaps we can negotiate a different agreement, adding China and others, or perhaps

we can't, in which case, we will outspend and out-innovate all others by far.

NICK SCHIFRIN: That presidential promise raises questions about an arms race, as the U.S.

is currently debating what to do about another arms control cornerstone, the New START treaty,

signed in 2010 by President Obama and then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.

It limits the number of long-range nuclear weapons, and is up for renewal in 2021.

And we are joined now by Andrea Thompson, undersecretary for arms control and international

security at the State Department.

Undersecretary Thompson, thank you very much.

Welcome to the "NewsHour."

ANDREA THOMPSON, U.S. Undersecretary for Arms Control and International Security: Thanks,

Nick.

Thanks for having me.

NICK SCHIFRIN: What's the plan to avoid an arms race?

Or are you trying to get Russia in an arms race?

ANDREA THOMPSON: No, We're not trying to get Russia in an arms race.

As I tell folks, we have remained in compliance with the INF Treaty and all of our other arms

control treaties, where Russia has violated that.

So, when folks point to an arms race, my counterpoint is that Russia started an arms race.

And it started eight years ago, when it violated the INF Treaty.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Does that mean you are OK if an arms race begins now?

ANDREA THOMPSON: You know, it's not an arms race.

It's upholding what's right for arms control regimes.

I remind folks that we have called out Russia repeatedly.

Our partners and allies have called out Russia repeatedly.

And they continue to deny that they're violating the treaty.

If you allow a treaty party to violate it with no consequences, you have now undermined

all of arms control.

NICK SCHIFRIN: But this isn't the first time in the last few decades of arms control that

both sides have thought the other one wasn't complying by the treaty.

And so why not consider an offer that's been on the table?

The Russians examine the missile defense systems that we talked about that they have a problem

with, which do have the mechanical and electronic components that could launch an offensive

missile, and you examine the Russian missile in return?

ANDREA THOMPSON: Well, the difference is, Nick, that Russia is in violation of -- material

breach of the INF Treaty.

And our partners and allies have been inconsistent with that.

No one has come forward and said, you know what, you're right, U.S.

Maybe Russia's not made a mistake here.

Consistent -- you saw the NATO statement in December after the secretary made his announcement.

You saw the strong NATO statement this past weekend after the president made his announcement.

We continue to present that intelligence and information to Russia.

They continue to disavow that.

They have also countered with our systems that are in violation.

No one, no party, other than Russia, has said that these systems are in violation.

And we continue to show them the intelligence why they are in compliance.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Right.

But Lockheed itself, when you go on their Web site, describes the capacities of those

missile defense systems as the capacity to have offensive.

Fine, the software may not be oriented that way, but they do have the capacity.

Don't the Russians have a point there?

And why not exhaust all possibilities and examine the Russian missile, and they examine

the missile defense system?

ANDREA THOMPSON: No, they don't have -- they don't have a point there.

We have been -- remained in compliance with the INF Treaty.

It's clear.

We have had inspections from their teams and vice versa.

Our technical experts have met.

We have consulted with partners and allies.

And, again, everyone looks at the -- looks at the system and says, you know what system

isn't in compliance, is the SSC-8.

NICK SCHIFRIN: How does the -- how does removing the U.S. from the INF Treaty eliminate the

threat posed by the Russian missile?

ANDREA THOMPSON: The threat posed was initiated by Russia.

Our obligations is, one, to fulfill our obligations for the treaty, which we have done, but first

and foremost that underscores all that, the safety and security of the American people.

Russia had chosen to violate it.

We are now, by suspending our obligations, can conduct the research and development for

those systems.

But, again, the foundation for all this is the safety and security of the American people.

NICK SCHIFRIN: So if the foundation is the safety and security of American people and

American allies...

ANDREA THOMPSON: Correct.

NICK SCHIFRIN: ... the threat posed, that you say is posed by the Russian missile that

you say abrogates the INF, how does withdrawing from the INF actually eliminate that threat?

ANDREA THOMPSON: The threat is there.

We are now able to conduct the research and development to put our systems into place.

The system I already there.

As I tell -- for the American public and those watching, this isn't a system that's in the

lab.

This isn't a prototype.

Russia has fielded multiple battalions, manned and equipped, that can -- they can range our

partners and allies and Americans abroad now.

NICK SCHIFRIN: You just used the phrase conduct research and development into U.S. systems.

Are you planning to deploy any ground-launched cruise missiles to Europe?

ANDREA THOMPSON: That's not in the plan.

But what I can tell you, when we develop next steps, it will be in consultation with partners

and allies.

And DOD has had the lead for this and has been very clear on next steps.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Been talking to NATO officials, and they say that the U.S. has briefed NATO

on a plan to test a new ground-launched cruise missile after the next six months, after the

INF is officially over.

Will you test new ground-launched cruise missiles in six months?

ANDREA THOMPSON: First, I will never project our next steps, nor will I speak for my Department

of Defense counterparts.

Important on the piece there is, it's in consulting with partners and allies.

As -- we met with the Russians in Geneva on January 15.

And in January 16, we were in Brussels briefing our NATO partners.

And we will continue to do that.

NICK SCHIFRIN: I want to move to the New START treaty, which, as we discussed, talks about

long-range nuclear missiles.

To extend New START beyond 2021, will you ask for new terms with the Russians?

ANDREA THOMPSON: Well, the -- 2021 is, as you point out, a couple years away.

We have got time with New START.

And the important point there is, we have met our central limits of New START.

We're in compliance with the New START treaty, and, quite candidly, Russia is in compliance

at this point with the New START treaty.

So, the 50-meter target, to use a military term, is the INF Treaty and Russia's compliance

and getting back into compliance with that.

We have got a couple of years with New START, and we look forward to continuing to fulfill

our obligations under all those treaties.

NICK SCHIFRIN: So, both sides, as you say, are under compliance.

But I want to bring up National Security Adviser John Bolton, who has opposed arms control

treaties.

And I want to play a few sound bites from him, starting in 2002, when he opposed the

anti-ballistic missile treaty.

JOHN BOLTON, U.S. National Security Adviser: Absent an agreement with the Russian side,

which is our preference, then we will exercise our unilateral option to withdraw.

I would urge him to get out of the Iran deal completely.

I think President Trump should say to Vladimir Putin, you either bring Russia back into compliance

with the INF Treaty, or we're going to get out of that one too.

The next step in the bilateral relationship with Russia is for this administration to

abrogate the New START treaty, so that we have a nuclear deterrent that's equal to our

needs to prevent future conflict.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Four major arms control treaties, four treaties that he wanted to leave, the

national security adviser.

Led by him, is the U.S. going to withdraw from the New START treaty?

ANDREA THOMPSON: I have no intentions of addressing that today.

We have got two more years.

Again, we have got an interagency process addressing that.

The fundamentals of that is what's best for the safety and security of the American people.

And it's a complex security environment.

We will see what 2021 holds.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Undersecretary Andrea Thompson, thank you very much.

ANDREA THOMPSON: Thanks, Nick.

For more infomation >> Is the U.S. entering a new arms race with Russia? - Duration: 8:42.

-------------------------------------------

Trump, Xi unlikely to meet before March 1st trade deadline: U.S. officials - Duration: 2:10.

now there is rising speculation that US President Donald Trump is going to meet

his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping during the planned North Korea u.s.

summit in Vietnam but Washington says that such a meeting is not likely to

happen before the March 1st deadline to reach a

trade deal between the two countries easing Jay reports speculation the US

President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will meet in

Vietnam was shut down by US officials on Thursday who say it's unlikely the two

leaders will meet before the March 1st deadline said by the two sides to reach

a trade deal however White House economic adviser

Larry Kudlow remained optimistic telling reporters that the leaders of the two

economic powerhouses could still meet a later well the president said number

times that he expects to meet with President Xi on trade when and where is

totally up in the air at the moment does it depend on the meetings this week I

wouldn't I wouldn't want to say one way or another it might you know hopefully

the meetings will go well president Trump on Tuesday during a State of the

Union address said any new trade deal with Beijing must include real

structural change to end unfair trade practice as the US continues to press

China to make major reforms Trump has vowed to increase US tariffs on 200

billion dollars of Chinese imports to 25 percent from the current 10% if the two

sides cannot reach a deal by March first watchers say the u.s. does not want to

hold talks with China in Vietnam to show that its focus currently lies on the

hotly anticipated second summit with North Korea they add that any

misunderstandings that could arise from meeting with China in Vietnam could lead

to a negative impact on denuclearization talks with North Korea from the upcoming

second summit with North Korean leader Kim jong-un to the March 1st deadline

the next few weeks will be intense for Trump and his administration easing J

Arirang news

For more infomation >> Trump, Xi unlikely to meet before March 1st trade deadline: U.S. officials - Duration: 2:10.

-------------------------------------------

Why Democrats say the U.S. needs a Green New Deal to combat climate change - Duration: 6:41.

AMNA NAWAZ: We learned this week that 2018 was the fourth warmest year on record, making

the five warmest years in recorded history the last five.

William Brangham takes a look at how U.S. lawmakers are responding to climate change

today.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: This Green New Deal calls for the U.S. to take dramatic action to reduce

the carbon emissions that are driving climate change, but which are also so intertwined

in our everyday lives.

The plan calls for the U.S. to be carbon-neutral in just 10 years, which would require massive

changes to how we get around, how we power our homes and our offices, how we grow our

food.

And, its supporters argue, we can make these changes while boosting jobs and the economy.

Its two co-sponsors, Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Congresswoman Alexandria

Ocasio-Cortez of New York, introduced their plan today to address what they say is the

growing danger of climate change.

REP.

ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D), New York: In order for us to combat that threat, we must

be as ambitious and innovative in our solution as possible.

So what we're doing today in introducing these resolutions here today is that it's not a

bill.

It is a resolution.

And what this resolution is doing is saying, this is our first step.

Our first step is to define the problem and define the scope of the solution.

And so we're here to say that small, incremental policy solutions are not enough.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: And Senator Edward Markey joins me now.

Welcome to the "NewsHour."

SEN.

EDWARD MARKEY (D), Massachusetts: Thank you.

Glad to be here.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Before we get to the substance of this, I should also say there are parts

of this that deal with housing and unions and jobs and wages and all of that, but I

really want to talk to you about the climate change impact of this.

Make the case why we need this deal.

SEN.

EDWARD MARKEY: The case is scientific.

Both the United Nations scientific community and every single U.S. federal agency in the

Trump era have now said that it's much worse than we ever thought it was going to be.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The threat of climate change.

SEN.

EDWARD MARKEY: The threat of climate change, and what the impact could be on our country

and on the planet.

And now they point towards 2030 as the year that we have to target, if we're going to

avoid the worst, most catastrophic consequences of climate change.

Now, we saw the wildfires out in California.

We see the storms which are far more dangerous than they ever were before.

It cost our country $300 billion last year just to deal with the impact of climate change.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Your -- the costs that we have been incurring this past year are evident,

as you have laid out.

The costs of the proposals that you're putting forward in this plan are also costly.

And I know you would argue that the benefits saved would accrue to the country enormously.

But do you think that these costs are surmountable?

Do you think we can generate the funds to do this?

SEN.

EDWARD MARKEY: I actually don't think we have an option.

The cost is prohibitive if we don't take this action.

We're going to be losing areas of our country along the coastline that would have been avoidable,

but it's going to total trillions of dollars.

So we should spend the money now.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: How do you imagine we will become carbon-neutral?

What are the tangible steps you would imagine we take?

SEN.

EDWARD MARKEY: Well, what we do in the resolution is, we talk about each one of the sectors,

transportation, agriculture, electric power generation.

And we talk about what the goals should be for us to find the best technologies that

can be used in order to reduce dramatically the greenhouse gases that come out of each

one of those sectors, and to then challenge the country, but to challenge the United States

House and Senate and the White House to deal with this issue.

But it's ready to be a politically weaponized issue.

You can really feel that this younger generation, millennials in our country, are just fed up

with no action it.

So I think this is far different than 10 years ago, when I was the author of the climate

change bill that passed the House and then died in the Senate.

I think now we have an army out there.

We have the resources to be able to fight back against the Koch brothers, fight back

against those that do not want to see this issue dealt with.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: One of the things that would be crucial to this, it seems, is government

investment in some of these technologies.

The market is working.

I mean, we have seen incredible growth in solar and wind over the last two years that

have largely been private sector.

But to make the changes you're talking about, do you imagine that the government is going

to have to heavily invest in these technologies?

SEN.

EDWARD MARKEY: There is going to require some government investment, no question about it.

We need the tax code to provide the same opportunities for wind and solar and all-electric vehicles,

new battery technology that we have been providing for 100 years to the oil industry, to the

natural gas industry, to the coal industry.

It's about time we really had a true level playing field in terms of where all these

subsidies go.

We have to fight every year just to continue the wind and solar tax price.

It's just not right.

So, yes, there's going to be a federal role, but there's always been a federal role in

energy policy.

The nuclear power plants have federal guarantees when they are built in our country.

So now we're talking about this renewable revolution.

We're talking about all-electric vehicles.

We're talking about mandating that all new buildings in the United States are twice or

three times more efficient than the ones that are being built today, and to refurbish the

old ones, so that they meet higher energy efficiency standards.

But that can be a huge private sector job creation opportunity.

We now have 350,000 blue-collar workers in the wind and solar industry.

And there's only 50,000 coal miners left.

We're going to take this up to hundreds of thousands?

No, millions of workers in this sector.

We need to have this become a voting issue in our country.

It really wasn't back in 2009 and 2010.

It's about to become one of the two or three most important issues in 2020 in the presidential

and in the congressional and Senate races.

And, with that, I think we're going to be able to see a lot more progress.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Senator Edward Markey, thank you very much.

SEN.

EDWARD MARKEY: Thank you.

Thanks for having me on.

For more infomation >> Why Democrats say the U.S. needs a Green New Deal to combat climate change - Duration: 6:41.

-------------------------------------------

Maduro's: Claim Venezuela Doesn't Need Aid As First US Shipment Arrives At Border | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:23.

For more infomation >> Maduro's: Claim Venezuela Doesn't Need Aid As First US Shipment Arrives At Border | NBC Nightly News - Duration: 1:23.

-------------------------------------------

Former Rep. John Dingell, longest serving member of Congress in US history, has died - Duration: 0:34.

For more infomation >> Former Rep. John Dingell, longest serving member of Congress in US history, has died - Duration: 0:34.

-------------------------------------------

Senators Vote to Shred the US Constitution for Israel - 7 Feb 2019 - Duration: 53:58.

All right, this is Arab Talk with Jess and Jamal. I'm Jess Ghannam.

-And this is Jamal Dajani.

- Jamal, we have an extraordinary show today. We have a lot to cover. We're

very fortunate today to have in studio with us Professor Rabab Abdul Hadi, director, founder

of the Amed program at San Francisco State, one of the leading academics and intellectuals

on the question of Palestine and intersectional analyses of Palestine. I mean truly a gifted

scholar. We have a lot to talk about today Jamal and as a context for the discussion

with Professor Abdulhadi and some breaking news that we have having to do with what's

happening at San Francisco State. I think as a backdrop and as a context for that, we

need to talk a little bit about Senate Bill 1. Just for our listeners in the midst of

all the chaos in Washington, in the midst of the shutdown of our government with

800,000 people not being paid< with gridlock between the-- you know in the Congress

between the house and the Senate and the impossibility of getting anything done for this country

And eighty thousand federal employees. - 800,000 not being able to work the Senate

in its infinite wisdom found the opportunity to work on one bill, and one bill only, and

pass a bill basically about the BDS movement, about essentially freedom of speech and about

the ability for people to condemn, to condemn, the inalienable right that people have to

boycott, divest and sanction whomever they want. So I think as a backdrop to speaking

with Professor Abdulhadi, we should take a little bit of time to condemn, to call out

and to articulate the so-called-- I mean we're talking about 71 Senators, Jamal, who voted

for this discriminatory, anti-constitutional bill. We need to count the people among the

71 who claim to be progressive, who claim to be liberal yet voted for this outrageous BDS bill.

And we will, so just to make it a little bit clearer, 25 of these senators from

the Democratic party, they joined the GOP on Tuesday. - With Marco Rubio.

To pass legislation that would empower states to punish

companies and individuals who boycott Israel to protest

its occupation of Palestinian territories. So this is just to make it--

What has that got to do with the United States today - They actually voted to trample on the First

Amendment and and I say, and I've said in the past our show the that these Senators

voted to shred the Constitution. So they pass the Bill 77 to 23 votes, and basically those

Senators who voted for the bill. Well, number one, I encourage them to reread if they haven't

read the Constitution. They should really look... - Google it. - I'm not even sure they

read the bill, Jamal. -And you know, which protects basically against the McCarthy era

tactics that this bill endorses. So the bill that they've passed the anti-boycott

bill is an attack on Americans and on the Constitution. So again, we are very fortunate

to have dr. Rabab Abdulhadi with us right here in the studio. - Welcome Professor. Abdulhadi

- Who basically had issues herself, attacks on academic freedom, attacks on the First

Amendment, similar issues, but we'll come back to this. - So wait a minute Jamal. I

think we need to contextualize it. Professor Abdulhadi is the tip of the spear of the attack

on academic freedom in this country, meaning she has been I'm sorry to say this Rabab you

have been targeted. You have you are the poster academic for vicious targeted attacks on people

who support the indivisibility of justice and this country and have and have been the

object of those attacks for many, many years. And should we start with the good news, just

before we get to the bad news or I mean, I don't know. It doesn't matter. - Which good

news do you want to talk about. - I mean the two lawsuits that were struck... - You want

to talk a little bit about the Senate bill. - Yeah. I think it's very much about the Senate

bill first, then we'll get to the others. - I think the Senate bill, let me just say

something that it is also happening at a time of increased Israeli aggression and violence

against the Palestinian. Increased state, as well as settlers, colonists really basically

militias who are going around attacking Palestinians. We are hearing more and more and more. So

Israel is stuck. Israeli supporters and apologist are stuck. They cannot find any ways to defend

Israeli actions because they are indefensible. You cannot defend violence, racist violence.

You cannot defend taking of land. You cannot defend killing women and children. You cannot

defend shooting young people. You cannot defend uprooting olive trees or cutting them down

depriving people of livelihood, of everything that Israel is doing we know again and again

including the bill that they pass the so-called Nation State bill that basically

actually really defines Israel, according to its Constitution- No, there is no Constitution

according to its laws, as an apartheid state that only favors one people, Jewish people

against everybody else, especially in indigenous people of Palestine. So I think this is really

important to keep in- So the apologist for Israel are actually very, they have they have

they have an issue. They they are stuck. They do not know how to defend Israel. The only

way to do it is to attack people who are speaking up for justice and to stop the March towards

Justice towards Justice were in Palestine as part of the indivisibility for justice

of more voices. So let's keep into consideration that Jewish voice for peace the largest Jewish

organization in the United States actually now adopts a position against Zionism. This

is huge the next row, we talked about it extraordinary position, but think about that. This is really

really important. There is multiple Jewish groups. If not now I Jan younger group Zephaniah

are that at San Francisco said we're very happy Jews against Zionism open Hill and there

are so many groups that are actually contesting the ownership of Illusionists by Design is

groups. And what the forward the Jewish World calls this the Jewish establishment. Okay,

this is so that's I think it's really important to keep that in mind. Secondly. These groups

are bullies. They are historically they are certainly used to with a pack and the people

they push around in Congress and they bribe them and they give them money that was their

arms and so on there are used to basically silencing everybody and crushing everybody

the fact that we stand up and speak up for rights is unacceptable to the right so they

become much nastier because they're also really stuck. I think it's really really important

to wrote Institute come campaign in 2010 saying that we need to delegitimize these people

we need to attack them and so on it's not working. It didn't work. It didn't work ethic

of attacking me and of anti-Semitism attacking everybody else calling us. There's a didn't

work with a failed in everything we can talk about the lawsuit. So this is I think this

is the context that comes to Congress and it's not really I mean, it's not the Senate

bill. It's a neighbor a Pac Bell, I think. Really need to say this is an impact Basin

8-pack bill, but passed in the Senate use the tools of the Senators that they pride

and this is the basically the third attempt right right by Senator Rubio. Yeah. Well,

it's interesting. It started with Rubio. He failed miserably Jamal and then after that

it went to and I'm really Disturbed to say this Senator Chris Murphy a Democrat who labels

himself as an might even run for president wants to be labeled as Progressive is seen

as kind of a voice for the voiceless. These are things that he won't have the second try.

Yes, it didn't pass and then we have the third version the Rubio new improved version that

actually did pass but Amed I do want to ask you. Hold on one second. Yeah. I want to ask

her about this question. What do you make of the current political climate that we have

complete gridlock in every aspect of our governmental process with the executive and legislative

branch? Yeah. That they find it in their heart and their soul even though there's I don't

think it's contradictory a just I think this is I mean if you look at the history of the

United States or any other oppressive governments, whenever they get stuck they will resort to

actually be attacking somebody else. I'm picking on somebody else as the skin in order for

them to think about building Unity. I mean you look at look at Trump's tweets. Just let's

do a little study. It's not going to be a big study because they're very short and obviously

they're not well cited or well-informed whatever but we can actually look at this sweet and

just do a study within a week or something and see where it where all of these things

come together. It's an aggressive policy. It's a policy for to kind of like a expand

grid. I mean they even yesterday his statements against socialism and so on expand white supremacy

exact full of lies the stuff that he did about the white landowners in South Africa and against

Land Reform the stuff that he supported the white supremacist in Charlottesville right

there the fact that he would not really condemn anti-Semitism and he basically was told by

the people in Pittsburgh don't even bother to even coming to pay condolences. And now

he got a couple of people to go to the State of the Union. Okay big deal again, he does

not own jewishness and they don't either an order Jared Kushner because the people there

are a lot of people have defied and stood up for what they think jewishness is so this

is cut it seems to me to be very consistent is that there are no sense of priorities that

represent the majority of the people in this country. They've set of priorities is to support

the rich is to support the aggressors. It supports corruption half of the people in

government have the people who run around Trump are under investigation and their corruption

very similar, by the way to the Israeli government and Netanyahu is not very different. There

is like it's a very similar recipe there. They're going they had the same Mo the reading

the same book, right? So you have this happening in Washington and so it is not an agenda definitely

is not an urgent of prayer to I think what's really important is that They were Senators

who voted against it now. The step is school has historically been is that Israel goes

unopposed Nobody challenges 23 voted against it, and I want to take a minute to name and

shame the Senators this Democratic senators who voted basically here are twenty five Democrats

including Senator. Angus King is an independent from men but caucuses, by the way with the

Democratic party who voted with the GOP to send the anti-boycott legislation to the house

right? Give me a minute here Bennett from the air from Colorado Blumenthal Connecticut

Cantwell, Washington Cardin, Maryland, Casey, Pennsylvania Coons, Delaware Cortez Musto

from Nevada, Duckworth, Illinois Hassan, New Hampshire Jones, Alabama King men Club occur

from Minnesota for sure. Yeah, good shot at Minnesota Mansion were Mankind from Virginia

ancient Menendez, New Jersey more a Democrat from Washington Rose and Nevada Peters, Michigan

Schumer from New York, which is no see Yuma Arizona Smith Minnesota stabbed now, Michigan

tester, Montana Warner, Virginia and white house, Rhode Island and widen Oregon shame

on them. Well not just shame trouble by me but I mean Heaven it's about seven or eight

of them actually try to say that their progress. Well, that's this but this is what's going

to play this game. And this is very important exception allows Palestine. You have to be

about Justice for All and the visibility but there is another thing that's really interesting

because I follow and re follow because we actually move back and forth to New York that

there that has been a very big debate in the associate assembly of Nur. Work that there

is a group that constitutes some kind of focus within the Democratic party that lined up

with the Republicans and basically went against this black assemblywoman. Yes, who is like

speaking that and they're basically I mean, it was really classical racism. It was really

classical presumed incompetent. They tried to confront a basin and she want the same

thing happened with the with the Cortez. Yeah, Alexandra and this is the same people who

win actually this is the remnants who actually it reminds me a lot of the Israeli history

of the Israeli Labour party embarrass the construction they are the ones who are most

civilized. They really know what's best for people. They know how to speak the right language

and so on and then everybody else is a Riff Raff and everybody else who is being put down

is person of color women queer people indigenous people people who come from Martinez committees

immigrants Muslims, Arabs Palestinians, I mean there is this is kind of lining up that

you have this greed and nastiness racist white supremacist Rule and then you have everybody

else the majority of the people. Those people are raising their Refuge there lifting taxes

of themselves imposing more stress upon the majority of the population deriving jobs aware

supporting no regulations whatsoever in rents in everything in everything they are doing

so you have a very nasty vicious agenda that's suppose in Justice and you have the majority

of the people in this country and the word who are for justice and is the same old recipe

just has different names to their but I think we're Bob what we can say and you're making

a very good point is that on the plus side. There were 23 Senators who did vote against

it, right which is unusual because usually Israelis business as usual It's usually the

difference Reflect some sort of politically right shift, right or political expediency

because some of the Senators that voted against it this time a little bit more running for

president running for president only that it really shows most important. I think it

really shows how far we have come. Yes in what Benham always calls turning the tide,

you know, the tide is turning Shin things are changing things are changing including

in the United States things have changed upset all the time around the world people support

Palestinian people support Justice in for Palestine. It seems that a no-brainer when

you come to the United States Israel, and the Israeli apologist design is believed that

this is their Turf how dare you one of the things that they're doing is how dare you

even challenged our Total Domination of the u.s. Of the policies and so on now we're going

to the Senate and we're going kind of like somewhere where it's actually showing that

more and more people not only re as I am because I think people realize I saw this whole thing

that I didn't know and now I know it's not true because That is Google. You can just

go and find everything easily. It's not about the song. You're listening to Arab talk on.

Kpoo San Francisco. This is 89.5 FM our guest in the studio is dr. Rob abdelhadi we're going

to go and we're going to talk a little bit about armored and about the progress in your

lawsuit. But also with the big win against Lawfare and I just want to before we shift

from this topic. Just also remind remind us all that this bill the s-1 by Senator. Yeah,

but there is also a little bit kind of a misconception about this bill because we keep talking about

the anti BDS punches through but this bill that Senator and that is that has been sponsored

by Senator Marco Rubio is a package of foreign policy bills that includes 38 billion dollars

in military. Aid to Israel and he stuck he could be buried within it as they do the combating.

This is what he calls it combating BDS act which would give States and localities more

legal authority to penalize companies and individuals who participate so I think also

but I will not lose sight. Yeah, I think about 38 38 billion dollars that they want to send,

you know, right towards Israel and then and it's kind of like by the way, let's squeeze

in but this unconstitutional Clause but let them bury it with in that bill exactly. But

here's the question guys. With the current climate in casino for a bill to pass bang.

It passes in the Senate. It has to the house in the house. There has to be reconciliation.

Yes, and then it goes to the executive to sign. I think that perhaps for the first time

in our memories there probably could not be enough votes in the Congress to get this passed.

I think it's all I mean, it's possible it's possible. I don't know. It's a decimal go

to the Congress now. Yeah, and I think it's I think it's really important to hold our

our Representatives accountable. It was representative of the public are supposed to be accountable

to the public not to the donors and the lobby that basically tries to twist arms and pass

on terrible agendas. I think what I was saying before is I think what's really important

is that now more people in representatives are realizing that you cannot actually give

Israel. Blanket check and get away with it. No, they may do it in wherever they may do

it in secret. But if you want to do it publicly you are basically saying what in 1985 we were

all saying is that upper side is a bad word apartheid is a bad thing and you're aligning

with apartheid you are basically supporting Injustice. And as if you were in during the

Civil Rights the height of the civil rights movement in the 60s, if you're actually supporting

segregation, you are supporting racism and what people did in both South Africa and in

the US and everywhere else is resort to boycott is demand sanctions estimate divestment from

things that are really terrible. It's a very basic simple formula. So there is it's a very

simple tool to do to kind of like, okay. I'm not going to participate in furthering Injustice.

That's basically what we the assessing and more and more people are realizing that they

can't actually do that and use Israel as business as usual everything is okay and get away with

it and that even their ties with the donors with the money with the pressure with whatever

all of Of and I should say it's not just a bag. I mean a pack is a very big but then

also the Christian zionists The Very extreme right-wing. I mean one of the reasons the

Christian zionists switched support for Trump is because he fulfilled quote-unquote his

promise to move the US Embassy in Tel Aviv to Jerusalem this stepping all over Palestinian

rise to this. Holy city and the fact that this holy city should be holy for all not

only for Israeli Jews and basically, but I have to I have to just say one more thing

and We talked about this last week, but I have to say it in front of you, which is look

at the irony. We are allowed to boycott American companies. Yeah easily. We can boycott Trump

Hotel if we want grapes in Chile. We we can criticize anybody we wanted as country. This

is part of our yes, our constitutional right and yet the Senate has the audacity to pass

a lot that limits our ability to do something in relation to another for but let me let

me say some things just look in two weeks. We will be talking about it. It's going to

be the day of remembrance. Yes for the construction of concentration camps for Japanese Americans

and Japanese people in the US it is going to be anniversary in August of the bombing

of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in terms of the DOR of terms of the in concentration camps

for the Japanese. It was the government that supported that's right McCarthy and begat

began with the committee. An American activities that basically prosecuted People based on

their beliefs. That's why we talk about McCarthyism. So it's the thing is is that the history let's

say the history of the US government and the history of you as Congress people and so on

has not always been good even the Supreme Court because we are talking about the separation

of powers. It all depends who sits on the superhero and what they do and what they don't

do. I mean they passed they they supported the Muslim ban because of the makeup of the

Supreme Court, it's always about power it always about holding people accountable. So

when we come to Congress and say what will Congress do eyes I do believe in holding Representatives

accountable and I support people who go and sit in the offices of the Congress people

the Senators and so on and hold them accountable. It is not the only strategy and people should

not only get activated only four years or every two years and so on we should always

be holding people accountable all the time because the more you out and make transparent

these things this back room deals and all of this corruption that is going on. And say

you need to be consistent and so on and educate people in the in the process then the less

likely it is for these policies to continue going but I think it's a very long time. So

maybe the Senate don't forget also there is a rift now between the Republicans and the

Democrats which I think is really important to remember because during the Vietnam war

one of the things and we used to always say as Palestinians when we were analyzing is

that part of the problem for Palestine solidarity in the US and getting it because the ruling

class in the u.s. Is United around Israel, but it is divided. It was divided around Vietnam

and that's what made it possible. That's right actually for the movement to build itself

support the struggle of the heroic people of Vietnam, you know, very affected yesterday

two days ago was the Lunar New Year. But also we have we've been in Vietnam in December,

you know our first trip but it was there was a division in the ruling class and that allowed

it to happen. Now, we're seeing something like this to this I think all of the stuff

bringing it together and and this is why if we you know, we Decide when you want to move

on to talk about I'm at and so on but this is why we need programs like this. This is

why we need to educate not only about issues that we think are quote unquote our issues.

They're not just our issues but all questions of Justice all issues and ask people intelligent

questions that raise critical issues. So people can think if they decide to support and Justice

is their choice. I mean, you cannot save everybody we need to call them out. What you need to

do. The question is what part of I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution

of the United States and is against all enemies foreign and domestic these Senators didn't

understand. That's the only this is the only question I have for them. I mean it just if

they can answer which part they didn't understand of this of their oath, you know, then they

can explain to me why they voted to shred the First Amendment and Shred the Constitution.

I want to switch gears right here because I want to give you a time first You know because

I know a lot of people join us each time new people. I want to briefly to talk a little

bit about it and the program because it's very important and then move on to the big

basically in my opinion one of the greatest victories. Absolutely one brand and and then

this is the example of where history of jurors once what I said, well, thanks. Well I say

this is where can we say? Well I said this is what the tide shifting absolute that you

know, you're small but capable legal team and then your work and the and all the support

around, you know able to defeat this so-called mega mega Lo fair project to to Lloyd. I'm

not not one but three times and you know that the case was dismissed dismissed. And and

now of course, there's a new case that you are mounting yourself and it Justified one.

So I'll briefly about armored and let's yeah, so I'm at the Arab and Muslim ethnicities

and diaspora stop.

This program which wasn't the original name the San Francisco State had a different name

even calling it Islamic and I we had this big debate about it people misnomer. I mean,

this is very similar to when they were saying Islamic at the sun was saying

Islamic people the stomach and people but I was basically heavily recruited to come

and set up the program as an international scholar of Palestine studies that will steer

12 faculty members. This is at least according to the US Bureau who kept he even sent me

the list. I found it the other day. You will see these faculty members, you will build

a program of international stature. They were very impressed by the center for American

studies that I was directing in Michigan and international connections and the dumbest

and the various do next with various communities and so on and when he won with was when I

said, what is this program going to be and he said the College of ethnic studies is that

this is really great. I'm very excited because what it does is bring scholarship pedagogy

and public role advocacy together and this is exactly what you need to do with the program

whether you are in an University of especially in a public university like San Francisco

state that has a social justice Mission. So I I came there was lot of tensions as you

remember, let's not forget you came from the University of Michigan. Yes Rabab one of the

most. Okay. This is the way I feel about Nablus. Yeah, I know but I need for context one of

the best universities in the world frankly. Well, yeah, I mean it was there was there

was Heavy recruitment. I did take a pay cut. I agreed to take a pay cut but it was that

the university committed and this is what we can like talk a little bit come back to

the lawsuit. But the university is committed to build the program with the critical mass.

Even though they said you will still 12 faculty members. I said that's not enough. I need

the critical mass. That's right insisted not to sign the contract until the university

committed to hiring two other tenure track positions to work with me on the road to hiring

more so we can actually build the department V Department in the College of ethnic studies.

I also insisted that we wanted to have support from the University there were multiple things

that we've and and I said, okay, I will take a cut in my salary and rear and and return

for this and why everybody knows and then I came in and there was a lot of tensions

between the United. The city and the community and the students over the Palestinian mural

honoring the late Edward side because the university especially the present president

Corrigan and the the pro-israel community the Zionist including the Jewish community

relations Council. We're very much against the two symbols in the mural the little cartoon

character of Handler which was the cartoon character that natural Ally the Palestinian

cartoonists who was assassinated and London by the Mossad created and handler was carrying

in one hand their pain because this is about knowledge. It's about this is the only thing

you can take with you when you get expelled from your country from your home. The only

thing different is your sword is yours aren't exactly a second haven't even said that I'll

kill him El Mundo kuya the word is the gun and the second had the key and on top of it.

It says allow the right of return right and both of them were completely opposed to another

when I came we actually all remember we had many things. I invited people to come to our

me to have a discussion about it. And so and we agreed we're Agree to remove these symbols

for not to have a mural which was a compromise a very bad compromise, but at the same time

Handler will live and all of the stuff we live and it has lived. Okay. So basically

we resolve some big crisis for the University. We get within two years the attacks began,

but I don't want to talk about what you want to talk about what happened, you know, but

you left out an important point from The Faculty positions and the commitment to you a time.

It was actually part of your contract. This is my is my contract I would not have sounded

at this is what about these really insisted on but that's really important. It was a contractual

agreement. Of course, it's not on paper. I would have never signed the contract if I

didn't get if I didn't get ten months academic faculty not 12-month administrative. I mean

president Corrigan had to send me a revised contract would not I refuse I said, I'm not

going to say thank you very much. The I compromised on three things one is I agreed to to faculty

lines instead of 3, right 2 is I agree to be associate professor not full professor

and three. I agree to take a cotton. These are the three things that I accepted because

it was such a promising thing. I came we build it. We have been attacked the attacks took

maybe a LOL for about maybe about six months or a year and so on after we set up the mural

but they resumed in 2009 because the students cops basically created the mural anniversary

and had armor baruti one of the cofounders of EDS you remember just because you were

very much enjoyed you actually moderated. I was the moderator of that promise night

and it was an amazing event and it was but that but the jcr see from then at least I

think before them theme seems that they were lobbying before but Trend they came and opposed

it. They demanded the shot of the event Corrigan was smart said no, I'm not going to violate

academic freedom, but they raised questions about me there is questions about funding

to the university they threatened and so on and then it began the next in a few days if

you a couple of weeks, I think Cory can cancel the searches we were doing which we are already.

The approved by the university that's right for by the HR my everybody else. It was vetted

everything. And by the way, sometimes the universe says oh, well, it's because we had

an economic crisis in 2008. I said, but the governing crisis was already there in 2009

when I submitted the job description and they were approved for so we were hiring other

people at the table where but I'm saying this if you say that and you say it's economic

so why did you even approve them to start excuse anyway, but but they basically they

canceled the searches and then they proceeded to basically delete them from the budget at

the same time. Also raising islamophobia was coming up and by the way, also the connection

was with the 2008 2009 Israeli attack on Gaza. So all of the stuff is not it's always Palestine

is always presence and they try to use technical reasons in order to like what they're doing.

Now what happens this is where continuous attack from the GCR see to I'm becoming an

accusing me of glorifying the murder of Jews and being anti-semitic to campus watch trying

to stop there. The agreement with an Azure to Horowitz putting up posters hateful posters

around campus and violent posters and to the lawsuit there is there were multiple things

every single time they tried and I think this is my belief. Is that what they try to do

the attack first Corrigan remove the faculty line. So I remain one person faculty member

and then what they were design is the grooves the pro-israel groups try to do then is to

dismantle the program first not to allow it to be institutionalized now when we institutionalize

it and we got 22 courses all GE fulfill general education requirement, which means every single

student at the university has to take one of them as a group of courses and we all then

we went into the armored minor and we had an academic minor approved which is the first

one in the world, by the way, then we went and we set up the Edward side scholarship,

which also was Folks were trying to block it and we can talk about them if you want

to and then they try to also block them in the Madam of understanding with an Azure National

University then and they've been attacking it less and we have it and now the most recent

thing that and then they try to block the teaching Palestine project that we have started

two years ago and we had all these successful conferences and so on now they are also trying

to block the latest program we're doing which is study abroad in Palestine. They can San

Francisco State students to study in Palestine and it is an amazing project. We're going

to make it happen. Basically. It's a systematic attack and every time you make a move every

time you show ya some success they try to put rabab killer hand here. Yeah, so So that

the amended and then I meant that they lost. Yes.

This was a small firm. Yeah, Lawfare was executive director said that they're going to make the

enemy pay and they're going to exact a heavy price of anybody who goes against Israel and

she had mentioned this a video San Francisco State and now by the way, she has a promotional

fundraising video on YouTube that talks about my case, but they lost I mean they lost this

with prejudice Prejudice. Okay. It's right there file, which means they can't bring it

again. They appealed to the ninth Circuit Court of Appeal in order for them to tell

their supporters give us money because they have no soot. They have no cause Okay, so

they lost big time and the the filed another lawsuit, but they did not name you. Yeah,

but let me talk about that one. I think it's really really important. You mentioned the

lawyers and the amazing work and and RababBenham who are just incredible and defending me pro

bono and the movement the amazing movement that will together, but the other thing is

that the decision of Judge Aquatic. The decision itself is actually a political decision to

yes, it is. Not at it because the first time he dismissed it on technical, you know reasons

and so on and told them this is what you need to do. If you want to bring gave them two

chances to give them to each other than they came and they came in with the same stuff

and they try to smear and they did all of these things and so on his decision dismiss

with prejudice. I think it's a text book to be read to be read and analyze because for

me it's very gratifying for him to say just because she's anti-zionist and supports Palestinian

resistance does not make her anti-semitic. He allowed as a Judicial notice the whole

website of the United States campaign for academic and cultural boycott of Israel for

he heard arguments. He did not allow them in but they were presented by 12 Jewish scholar

senior Jewish Scholars who said that I'm this is this is doesn't fit. It doesn't really

make sense. They supported me by open Hillel that channel is halal and it's their accordion

and McCarthyism and so on so the lawsuit itself, the text itself actually is a text to be a

so then what Did is they went to the state court and they felt a lot lawsuit against

San Francisco State University and California State University. They don't name me in it,

but they're actually attacking the stuff that they fail they fail to prosecute me on the

question of near Barakat protest on the question of know you right where now they're focusing

on know you're at in the state court and trying to basically bring people to have the position

part of the reason is they failed in the Lawfare lawsuit also, they could not get me to come

give a deposition. They could not get a single piece of paper. They could not they got some

stuff from the University. For example, they have 400 pages of micro responses within the

Jacques National University because if you remember in the first one they fought they

said, oh she's going to undergrad student about terrorism and we need all the stuff

from Amazon has in abundance in University gave them everything. Okay, there is nothing

so then they took it out of the second amended but they didn't say anything and they never

apologized to me for making all these accusations around me. But but we did not give them anything

we Assisted that the Universe should not settle and the university did not settle. They were

going to settle and we said no you cannot you cannot settle for the universe. You can

assert that for me. Well, it's so creamy. I mean my read and I'm not a legal expert

maybe next time. We'll have your lawyers. Yes, Mark and Venom right here. Yeah, but

my read number one, of course, we all know that they have Deep Pockets. Yes, these guys

have ours 800-plus lawyers. They have a million on the unlimited funds. They can file a lawsuit

after lawsuit and they've been doing this. But now I think they're coming to the conclusion

that they've lost. They want to save face and they're going after the institution which

is San Francisco State University or which is easy to give up the Su hoping I think for

a settlement as so they can tell their followers for now. We talked about this before now I

want we have 15 minutes or so. I had to say one of my lawyers actually representing people

in the lawsuit against the Lawfare. Well at San Francisco State Mark Kleiman is also represented

to people in the essay that's another suits and they recently had a they had a win which

know this is different. Also another basically a win for the attack on

the American Uniform American studies before we talk about your loss. Indication yes of

the breaking the solidity of the state business as usual status cool. Israel does no wrong

with support Israel and so on so I do believe I am convinced and everybody knows my belief

is not a secret University knew this before they hired me they already knew because I

was already one of the people who actually worked on the farm during the academic and

cultural boycott of Israel before the BDS movement, you know, the call came out in 2005.

So I'm very clear. My position is very clear. I organized in 2000 1985 National 26 Day 26

City campaign called Israel and South Africa the upper side Connection in the midst of

the anti-apartheid movements when I remember that so people know, you know, it's not a

secret but I am convinced that one of the ways is you really have to a you our job is

to produce knowledge and we need to produce knowledge for justice. Okay, and to do that

that also challenges all the dogmas that exists from support for Israel and so on soap One

of the things is that when you see wrong, there is no way you can justify to your students

that you are supported the wrong. If you don't stand up for justice, you cannot do that,

especially at the public university where it is accountable to the public. I mean, this

is our mission just because some Congress people and some Senators deviate from what

the rule is that does not make it right. My does not make it right and they do wrong we

have to keep challenging and holding people accountable. So everything that has happened.

I mean, look, I'm Association of Asian American studies American studies Association and not

Native American indigenous studies Association National Association for Chicano, Chicana

writes several Association of black studies National Women's studies Association. That's

right. There are social justice peace and Justice as there is some historians oral.

There is so much stuff. This is something that you're not able to stop it was at maybe

at the beginning was a small thing. Now, it's an international movement. They try to take

down Jeremy corbyn. The resume is the one who got embarrassed with the Exit and so on.

So there is you it's very it takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of resources. We don't

have definitely Deep Pockets, but we have the depth of the support of justice for the

movement. Okay is what I want now for our listeners who may be joined us a little late.

That's the voice of Professor Rabab Abdul Hadi founder and director of the Amed program

at San Francisco State. One of the foremost academicians in the world on intersectional

aspects of Palestine and Palestine history. She's an extraordinary academic. You might

lose you might forget that in light of the fact that she's been such a target for 12

years, but actually in spite of that she's been managing to produce an amazing body of

academic research and I think this is the objective is to basically litigate us to death

right to wear us down, but let's get to talk about your lawsuit. This is what's going on.

What's happening with your lawsuit. Okay. So the reason I filed the lawsuit after 12

years being a You're filing the lawsuit to hold the university accountable and basically

Francisco San Francisco State violated my contract. It's a breach of contract rates

for breach of contract. And also there's it is about discrimination racism islamophobia

and the Arab antipolis tinian disparate treatment between also how they are. We are being treated

at San Francisco State and I'm not speaking about all people of color, even though it

is about that is there is also discrimination and racism San Francisco State Ibiza becoming

a police state not only that our police carry tasers, but also for them to even say to David

Horowitz give us a heads up whenever you want to come and put all these nasty posters. Meanwhile,

they do not stop a Nazi, you know, who's putting all this nasty propaganda and all this violent

stuff on their websites and San Francisco State has done everything possible in collusion

with the Zionist. I am convinced that San Francisco State is Going hand-in-hand with

the Zionist not only their donor with designers and with the right wing with mink agenda.

They are basically missing about San Francisco State is supposed to be and they would they

use it. Also they bribe some people they help, you know, as some people things they bad some

people on the back they threaten some people and so on so there is a lot of tools that

is actually a making my life as a person as a scholar. They're trying to make my life

miserable. So I would just shut up and basically it's affected my career because I'm spending

a lot of time defending myself and standing up for to build the program instead of sitting

down writing articles writing things and so on Scott it's constant they constantly use

even bureaucratic the abuse of the bureaucracy little things every single piece of paper

become such a huge thing. My course is now have been taken away from me and and by his

direct direct attack to kind of like undermine the Army studies program and dismantle it

and damage it they using my request for a family medical leave. Exploded against me

too. You know, this is all the pressure tactics. This is no it's your legal, right? This is

what McCarthyism did McCarthyism smears people as for your friend to stand against you hire

scabs threatens your livelihood tries to pressure you since you this we received the death on

the voice mail, but the guy left a message saying Muslims will die. We sent it to the

university. Nobody investigate them. They always said investigate they don't do anything

about that. They have they have violated my disabilities accommodation. They have violated

my contract they have even that they actually denied me my application for difference in

Pay leave next year to do teaching Palestine project. And the way that I get to receive

a letter from the president saying based on your college recommendation. The project is

not well-defined is not doable and it doesn't connect to your career and Mike, you know,

we will be met with it most of it already. We've actually accomplished most of the teaching

post back to your career. Connect your bedroom is your mind. It's not what they're on like.

What do you mean? It's not what defines actually I mean the thing is is that this is only a

lot of examples and we don't have enough time to talk. But that is a very troubling issue.

I mean if you look at the case and we're not exam Francisco State University. It's a public

university supposed to accommodate all people all ethnicity Community creates Etc. When

I walk on campus that are Arabs and Muslims and African-Americans Latinos and whatever

people yes, yeah. I look and maybe I am a nosy journalist. Right? And I look at the

paperwork Etc. There is a major connection and a real connection because we've devoted

actually two shows talking about for example, the the Jewish Community Federation of San

Francisco. And this this work was investigative journalist that were was done by the forward

and other people and others in electronic intifada. We found a hobby that Jazeera that

we found out that they have spent more than three hundred million dollars Jen Diller fun

to show support the support the give a lot of these groups like the oven Horowitz David

home campus watch all the groups that have been harassing you and harassing other academics

and they've been silent about it. And this is because they cannot deny it. We have the

documents from their tax filing. Yes on this then being a nosy person reading. We know

that right here in San Francisco. The jcr see Jewish community relations Council has

conducted several meetings with the president and the higher Echelon at San Francisco State

University Israel, and they took him to his room exactly. So I've been seeing this name.

I know at San Francisco State University there is Jason poor. Yes, and he is the husband

executive director of the University Corporation the university Corporation then digging around

there is also a be poor and she's the executive director of the gist Jesse are see it wasn't

the latest article by the J weekly last week about the case and they are they have Vichy

they have been basically behind the attacks on you. How's this possible? Yes, just a question.

I mean I'd like to know I mean it's $300 worth of and this has been kept out of the media

and I was coming out and we know you know, the three hundred million dollars all these

organizations by the way. It's not just organizations right here in the United States all over the

guy. No, no there is settled and set of an organization which is a better. Wait a minute

the jdl contributed. Yes. Yes. Yes. Issues like about islamophobia about anti-arab sentiments

the community goes through hell just to have a meeting with the administration just to

kind of he hasn't talked about many things left and right and basically trying to destroy

your career at destroy. Our me say Let me let me know. They've met with Anti-Defamation

League Jay CRC is bragging about sensitizing the highest administrators at San Francisco

State on Zionism. That's after president Wong last March said zionists are welcomed and

I criticize them and said this is offensive and so on and they try to actually shut me

down force me to take down the Facebook and it was the dean of the College of ethnic studies

as well as the Provost that participated as the tools doing this they have so they've

been trying to do all of this the also I should just say you as you were mentioning Jason

pores Jess Imports was the chief of staff of President Corrigan when I started I remember

that he also went to speak. He was also the president of their own William Beveridge Jewish

Democratic Club. The Jewish Club isn't Democratic party in San Francisco was one of its goals

is to support Israel in 2010 when Israel targeted the mavi marmara the ship. We went a whole

bunch of us from their Palestinian Arab Muslim communities of Justice went to the Board of

Supervisors. Now remember that scent of us a resolution to condemn the violence and to

also lift the blockade on Gaza. I spoke at the first week the second week who speaks

is what Jason pores telling the Board of Supervisors that this is not an issue that concerns San

Francisco. It's a foreign issue very far away and San franciscans should not be involving

themselves with foreign affairs and so on which is very interesting because they he

was one of the people who was involvement in near Burkett to campus. I mean, so if you

don't want to get involved in whatever, what are you doing bringing the mayor of occupied

Jerusalem to speak on campus he so he is Against that then I had when I was trying to do that

website scholarship. He actually tried to block it and I had to get in touch with Miriam.

Sorry to say that the state actually doesn't have a problem with it and Miriam and the

children were not children anymore. They actually support this is my husband was an educator

with her bob is doing his education. We supported all Oddity. He tried to last year he pressured

and he succeeded in getting the dean to ensure the room which lasts it was yesterday the

anniversary of teach in Palace on of San Francisco State February 7. Mm. They he everything will

time. I submit a request for travel authorization, especially to Palestine is a mou with amnesia.

They always say to me to try to change it and they hold it up and they say you're not

going to get reimbursed. You need to change it in consultation with the presence of his

and I said, no because I've already consulted with the president of his we already have

the memorandum understand. I'm not going to change it. So I get an email from the dean

saying you're not going to get reimbursed and then I said no I'm going to I'm going

to do it anyway, and they said you will look at them. And I said this one also right Bob

says I Yeah, I want to just say cuz we only have a couple of minutes left. We'll continue

some of this next week. We get lots of calls about what people can do to support you. Like

well, I know I'm not supposed to ask for funding is no but this is not about fundraising going

to say well, what about a website want people that is a website. There is multiple website.

That is a website called the international campaign to support Professor Abdul Hadi there

is what's the website? It's on Facebook. It's all just go good. Go. Google. Roberto has

come up. Okay, but we really want I want people to call San Francisco State now and ask them.

Why did they cancel my classes? What did they take my classes away from me? Why did they

mess up with the course that Sahara below the executive director of care was going to

teach and now we lost it anymore. Why do they continue messing up with Mike? Why are they

using my application for study abroad in Palestine to mess up with my summer courses? Why are

they continuing to punish us left? And right. What's the phone number for San Francisco?

It's in the way. I can give it to you. If you want to put it on the website Yeah, we

actually have it in one of my Facebook. I have the president. The the president of the

in and the interim president called the dean called the Provost and ask them. Why are they

why are they attacking you? Why are they why are they hands of I think hands of rubber

bands of armored. This should be has of our students. This should be the bottom line.

I would say also follow the money follow the three hundred million dollars that have been

spent on basically attacking academic freedom defaming Muslims defaming Arab Scholars, defending

defending Palestinians and students and also in your basically I assume new discovery.

We will get to see who are the key players who have been treating with who especially

give us public which I find it funny because Trump Scandal is about who met with whom and

one way once when and where and once we get to all of this we're going to be naming names.

They tune. This is Arab Talk on KPOO, San Francisco. Make sure you basically go to our

website at arbtalkadio.com. We have all our archived shows. Also we broadcast live on

KPOO 89.5 FM San Francisco, and we want to thank Professor Abdulhadi you again for her

for her steadfastness and we'll see you next week. I'm glad by the Palestinian people and

people around the world stay tuned. We'll see you next week.

For more infomation >> Senators Vote to Shred the US Constitution for Israel - 7 Feb 2019 - Duration: 53:58.

-------------------------------------------

Technological innovations of the United States | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 1:12:04.

For more infomation >> Technological innovations of the United States | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 1:12:04.

-------------------------------------------

Democratic lawmakers to take trip to US southern border Politics - Duration: 1:35.

Democratic lawmakers to take trip to US southern border Politics

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland will travel with a group of newly elected congresswomen to Texas and New Mexico on Saturday.

The group so far includes Democratic Reps. Veronica Escobar of Texas, Xochitl Torres Small of New Mexico, and Deb Haaland of New Mexico, who each represent districts near the southern border. Democratic Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon of Pennsylvania is also going on the trip.

"Despite the Presidents demagoguery over immigration, there is not a national emergency or a security crisis at the border that demands a wall," Hoyer said in a statement Thursday.

The trip comes as Congress has a February 15 deadline to agree on border security funding before another partial government shutdown goes into effect. A bipartisan, bicameral committee has been tasked with reaching an agreement that will be acceptable to President Donald Trump, who has demanded more than dollar 5 billion for a wall along the border with Mexico.

"We face challenges at the border, and as negotiations over how to best secure the border continue, I feel it is important to travel there to meet directly with immigrant advocates about the humanitarian situation as well as receive a border security briefing," Hoyer said.

The House members will begin their visit with a morning meeting with local immigrant rights advocates, followed by a visit to a migrant shelter in El Paso, Texas.

The group plans to stop along the border at several points, including a port of entry and the location where , a 8 year old Guatemalan child who died while in US Customs and Border Protections custody, was apprehended. Felipe and his father was apprehended about 3 miles west of the Paso Del Norte port of entry in El Paso.

CBP officials will then brief the group on border security before the members end their trip with a news conference in Sunland Park, New Mexico.

Torres Small said in a statement provided to CNN that the "realities of life on the border are often misrepresented and politicized by those in Washington."

"I am excited to have the opportunity to show Leadership and other Members my home, the community I grew up in, and talk with them about the real challenges we face along the border, from our most rural stretches to our most urban centers," the congresswoman said Thursday.

For more infomation >> Democratic lawmakers to take trip to US southern border Politics - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

S. Korea, U.S. to sign defense cost-sharing deal this Sunday: Source - Duration: 0:29.

Seoul and Washington will sign a preliminary agreement on defense cost sharing this Sunday.

That's according to a diplomatic source here in the nation.

Earlier reports indicated South Korea will pay around 9-hundred-15 million dollars, though

the deal will only cover this year.

The Trump administration is believed to have demanded an annual sum of around one billion.

Earlier in the week,... the U.S. State Department said the allies had reached an agreement in

principle... but gave no details.

For more infomation >> S. Korea, U.S. to sign defense cost-sharing deal this Sunday: Source - Duration: 0:29.

-------------------------------------------

State of the Union reactions, GIFd Politics - Duration: 1:26.

State of the Union reactions, GIFd Politics

The golf clap heard round the world, delivered by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. This was her response to Trumps early call for "the boundless potential of cooperation, compromise, and the common good." Seems the businessman turned President may not have convinced her.

Another notable Pelosi clap, this time with a hair fix. One of the more awkward places in Washington has got to be sitting behind the President during the State of the Union, even if he is from your party, and especially if he is not.

Another person who didnt seem amused by at least one part of Trump speech was Sen. Kamala Harris. Harris is one of Trumps 2020 challengers from the left, and she seems to think "putting the ruthless coyotes, cartels, drug dealers, and human traffickers out of business" is something that is .

Another 2020 contender, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, almost straight up rolled her eyes during Trumps : "Unemployment has reached the lowest rate in half a century. African American, Hispanic American and Asian American unemployment have all reached their lowest levels ever recorded. Unemployment for Americans with disabilities has also reached an all time low. More people are working now than at any time in our history 157 million."

You know who did get jazzed? These women sitting on the Democrats side of the chamber. Wearing suffragette white, a large group of women, many of them new to Congress, that, a century after women won the right to vote, Congress has more women than ever before.

Trump got in on the reaction game too, conducting an impromptu for an 81 year old Holocaust survivor who attended the speech as a guest. Which showed that, regardless of what those in the audience or those at home thought of the speech, some moments can bring people together.

He is very polite and said thank you. Usually the first thing I say after people sing happy birthday to me is something about how awkward it was which, for the record, makes it more awkward .

Since this years State of the Union was rescheduled, that meant it fell on Lunar New Year. Which means naturally Buzz Aldrin, one of the first men on the moon, was there. Basically America got to collectively

Stick with me here, because this is not so much a GIF as a silent documentary short. I just want to understand what happened to Trumps tie and why it was askew for the beginning of the speech. Look: It is straight, then he turns to our left and when he turns back, its stuck for no discernible reason.

Ties had a huge night on Tuesday. Heres Rep. Billy Long of Missouri having Trump sign his tie.

Lets do this again. Same time next year?

For more infomation >> State of the Union reactions, GIFd Politics - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

Trump, in State of the Union, pushes for a great rebuilding of Americas crumbling infrastructure - Duration: 2:08.

Trump, in State of the Union, pushes for a great rebuilding of Americas crumbling infrastructure

President , in his second State of the Union address, called for a bipartisan infrastructure push on Tuesday night.

"Both parties should be able to unite for a great rebuilding of Americas crumbling infrastructure," Trump told Congress and government leaders. "I know that Congress is eager to pass an infrastructure bill, and I am eager to work with you on legislation to deliver new and important infrastructure investment."

"This is not an option. This is a necessity," Trump added. During his presidential campaign, Trump called for spending dollar 1.5 trillion over a decade for infrastructure projects, but major funding has not been forthcoming.

The bipartisan call comes more than a week after the longest government shutdown in U.S. history ended. After a 35 day partial shutdown, Trump and Democratic leaders in Congress on Jan. 25 agreed to reopen the government for three weeks. However, they have not been able to agree on funding for Trumps demand a wall along the U.S. Mexico border.

Wall Street strategists said ahead of the speech that Trumps comments on trade, infrastructure and drug pricing could be market moving. Stocks that could benefit from such the infrastructure push include , and .

But Wall Street strategists warned that the passing of an infrastructure bill would be a long shot.

"It is likely President Trump will push an infrastructure bill at the State of the Union," Dan Clifton, head of policy research at Strategas Research Partners, wrote in a note ahead of the speech. But unless "President Trump specifically backs raising the gasoline or corporate tax rate, it is unlikely to see an agreement on a large deal."

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Share this video...

Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.

Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox

Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. 

© 2019 CNBC LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Data is a real time snapshot asterisk Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis.

Data also provided by

YOUR BROWSER IS NOT SUPPORTED.

The requested video is unable to play.

The video does not exist in the system.

Were not able to play this video if an ad blocker is enabled.

Please disable your ad blocker on CNBC and reload the page to start the video.

For more infomation >> Trump, in State of the Union, pushes for a great rebuilding of Americas crumbling infrastructure - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

No plans yet for Trump Xi meeting on trade US officials China News Al Jazeera - Duration: 3:46.

No plans yet for Trump Xi meeting on trade US officials China News Al Jazeera

Kudlow and Mnuchin indicate that the Chinese and US leaders may not meet before the March 1 deadline for a trade deal.

There are no plans yet for US President and Chinese President to meet soon in hope of finalising a trade deal, Trump said on Thursday.

Asked by a reporter whether there would be a meeting before the deadline, which was previously set as March 1, Trump said: "No."

When asked whether there would be a meeting in the next month or so, Trump said: "Not yet. Maybe."

The remarks confirmed comments from administration officials who said the two men were unlikely to meet before the deadline, dampening hopes of a quick trade pact and sparking a drop in US stock markets.

rump has said previously he would need to meet with Xi to seal a final deal.

The countries had taken a 90 day hiatus in their trade war to hammer out a deal, and another round of talks is scheduled for next week in .

Earlier on Thursday, White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow indicated that it was unlikely that the two leaders would meet before the deadline, but they could still hold talks later.

"At some point, the two presidents will meet, that is what Mr Trump has been saying. But that is off in the distance still, at the moment," he told reporters.

Secretary Steven Mnuchin added that "theres nothing planned at this time for [a meeting], but the president has talked about potentially meeting with President Xi and well see what progress we make next week". 

Mnuchin and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer are scheduled to travel to China next week to continue for the third round of trade negotiations.

Kudlow told Fox Business that there was still a "sizable distance" separating the two sides. 

The news that the two leaders were now unlikely to meet spurred a sharp selloff in US stocks, dashing the optimism that had been building that the countries were progressing towards a deal before tariffs on Chinese imports rise to 25 percent after the March 1 deadline.

The S andP 500 Index tumbled to its low of the day, down 1.6 percent in its biggest drop in more than a month. Treasury bond yields dropped as investors sought safety in sovereign US debt. The benchmark 10 year yield slid four basis points to 2.66 percent, the lowest in nearly a week.

"I could see where that would impact the markets because, obviously, we had a lift in the month of January from optimism surrounding these trade talks," said Peter Jankovskis, co chief investment officer at OakBrook Investments LLC in Lisle, Illinois. "It does make sense the market is pulling back somewhat on that." 

Last week, Chinese and US negotiators said they made "important progress", Chinas state media reported following the conclusion of two days of high level talks in Washington, DC.

Speaking at the White House during a meeting last Thursday with Chinese Vice Premier Liu He, Trump said he was optimistic that the economic powerhouses could reach "the biggest deal ever made".

Despite the optimism, the White House emphasised in a statement that a scheduled tariff increase on dollar 200bn of Chinese goods to 25 percent from 10 percent was a "hard deadline" if no deal was reached by March 1.

Trump said last week he did not think he would need to extend the March 1 deadline, adding that he believes "every point will be agreed to" when he meets Xi.

Washington complaints about technology transfers and intellectual property protections, along with accusations of Chinese cybertheft of US trade secrets and a systematic campaign to acquire US technology firms, were used by Trumps administration to justify punitive tariffs on dollar 250bn worth of Chinese imports.

China has retaliated with tariffs of its own, but has suspended some and is allowing some purchases of US soybeans during the talks.

Chinese officials have said their policies do not coerce technology transfers.

For more infomation >> No plans yet for Trump Xi meeting on trade US officials China News Al Jazeera - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

US-VISIT (United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology) | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 6:49.

For more infomation >> US-VISIT (United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology) | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 6:49.

-------------------------------------------

Democratic lawmakers to take trip to US southern border Politics - Duration: 2:07.

Democratic lawmakers to take trip to US southern border Politics

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland will travel with a group of newly elected congresswomen to Texas and New Mexico on Saturday.

The group so far includes Democratic Reps. Veronica Escobar of Texas, Xochitl Torres Small of New Mexico, and Deb Haaland of New Mexico, who each represent districts near the southern border. Democratic Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon of Pennsylvania is also going on the trip.

"Despite the Presidents demagoguery over immigration, there is not a national emergency or a security crisis at the border that demands a wall," Hoyer said in a statement Thursday.

The trip comes as Congress has a February 15 deadline to agree on border security funding before another partial government shutdown goes into effect. A bipartisan, bicameral committee has been tasked with reaching an agreement that will be acceptable to President Donald Trump, who has demanded more than dollar 5 billion for a wall along the border with Mexico.

"We face challenges at the border, and as negotiations over how to best secure the border continue, I feel it is important to travel there to meet directly with immigrant advocates about the humanitarian situation as well as receive a border security briefing," Hoyer said.

The House members will begin their visit with a morning meeting with local immigrant rights advocates, followed by a visit to a migrant shelter in El Paso, Texas.

The group plans to stop along the border at several points, including a port of entry and the location where , a 8 year old Guatemalan child who died while in US Customs and Border Protections custody, was apprehended. Felipe and his father was apprehended about 3 miles west of the Paso Del Norte port of entry in El Paso.

CBP officials will then brief the group on border security before the members end their trip with a news conference in Sunland Park, New Mexico.

Torres Small said in a statement provided to CNN that the "realities of life on the border are often misrepresented and politicized by those in Washington."

"I am excited to have the opportunity to show Leadership and other Members my home, the community I grew up in, and talk with them about the real challenges we face along the border, from our most rural stretches to our most urban centers," the congresswoman said Thursday.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét