Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 2, 2019

Auto news on Youtube Feb 2 2019

Do you like being outdoors?

Does nature inspire you?

Do you love adventure, big or small?

Hello! I'm Matt.

And I am Diana.

Our channel is Adventurous Way

because we like to do things the Adventurous Way.

We are on a journey to visit all the National Parks and National Park Units in the United States

That's 418 of them.

Yes, that's right.

In addition to the all of the National Parks we will also

going to be visiting all of the National Monuments, the National Historic Sites

and all the other types of units managed by the National Park Service

In order to do this we left our four bedroom home and

we moved into a small Outdoors RV travel trailer that we tow behind our Ford F150.

And we estimate this will take several years.

On our channel you will see videos about exploring the National Parks and

full-time RV life on the road.

And make sure to subscribe because

we have new videos every week!

We believe It is far more fun to live life the adventurous way.

I'm originally from Latvia, a small country in North Eastern Europe,

and I moved to the United States 11 years ago to go to the university.

I am originally from the UK and I moved here with my job about 5 years ago.

Diana and I met just a few weeks after I moved here to the U.S. 5 years ago.

And we have been together ever since.

We found a common interest in traveling.

Shortly after we met one of our very first trips together was backcountry camping in Yosemite.

We fell in love with the National Parks and with each other.

Roadtrips became our favorite thing.

After one of the many trips visiting National Parks an idea was born.

What about visiting all of them?

So 2 years later after lots of research,

we finally did it!

We quit our jobs, and moved into the RV full-time

and hit the road.

So are we going to make it to all 418 National Park Units?

Subscribe to find out!

And then comment below to say hi and introduce yourself!

For more infomation >> Young couple quit their jobs to visit all 418 U.S. National Park Units - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

WW3 tensions ESCALATE as US hints at Venezuela military intervention - 'Time for ACTION' - Duration: 4:32.

 Mike Pence, working to ramp up pressure for the ouster of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, told a rally on Friday that the time for dialogue had ended and all options were on the table to replace Mr Maduro's government

Mr Pence told a cheering crowd at a campaign-style rally: "This is no time for dialogue

This is time for action. Related articles  "The time has come to end the Maduro dictatorship once and for all

" The US government has recognised opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela's interim president and has called for other countries to do so as well

 Mr Maduro, who began a second term last month after disputed 18 elections, has said he would be ready for talks with the opposition and possibly third-country mediation

 He has said the National Assembly head, Mr Guaido, self-declared claim to the presidency in an attempted US-backed coup

 Previous attempts at dialogue, including a round of talks led by the Vatican, have failed

 Opposition leaders believe Mr Maduro uses such talks to quell protests and stall for time, and have said they would only be interested in dialogue if it involved negotiations for Mr Maduro's departure

 Mr Pence said the United States was prepared to work with the opposition-run National Assembly to deliver humanitarian aid to Venezuela

 The Vice President said: "We are prepared to work with the provisional government of Venezuela, the National Assembly and President Guaido

 "The American people will marshal our resources and the resources of nations around the world to provide millions in humanitarian relief

" The US has so far failed to rule out the option of military intervention in the poverty-stricken South American country

 Russia ahas warned against such action and indicated it would provide its own military assistance to the incumbent leader if Trump chose to send troops to the country

Related articles  Speaking of US military intervention, Moscow's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov warned: "We consider that would be a catastrophic scenario that would shake the foundations of the development model which we see in Latin America

" He added: "Venezuela is friendly to us and is our strategic partner. "We have supported them and will support them

"

For more infomation >> WW3 tensions ESCALATE as US hints at Venezuela military intervention - 'Time for ACTION' - Duration: 4:32.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Creates 304K Jobs in January, Smashing Estimates – Ivanka Stoked For America - Duration: 5:53.

For more infomation >> U.S. Creates 304K Jobs in January, Smashing Estimates – Ivanka Stoked For America - Duration: 5:53.

-------------------------------------------

Golden Jubilee | U.S. Consulate General Chennai Building - Duration: 1:28.

"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind."

Over 238,000 miles away, the U.S. Consulate General in Chennai

established its present day home right here at Gemini flyover, Chennai, then Madras.

The year was 1969.

The library's current home in this building, began when Chester Bowles came here

to dedicate the building in January of 1969.

Hello! I'm Robert Burgess,

the Consul General of the United States here in Chennai.

We hope you will join us as we celebrate 50 years in this historic Consulate building.

I've been part of a film festival which we held here which was all of musicals.

It has been a blessing to all the scholars, citizens, students of this city.

I was an assistant professor here, then grown onto become the vice principal

and now the principal.

I definitely wanted students also to go through that exciting journey which I had myself gone through.

The Consulate and the American Center has had a legacy of supporting strong U.S.- India

people-to-people ties.

Hope you join us as we celebrate 50 years through 2019!

For more infomation >> Golden Jubilee | U.S. Consulate General Chennai Building - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

[HARSH TRUTH] The REAL reason US Government Shutdown isn't over - Duration: 2:33.

Recent correspondence from the White House has informed the public of an itchy outbreak.

We caught up with president Trump this afternoon for comment, and the president revealed his

unfortunate first hand experience...

Hazardous materials expert John Reamer tells us, inner city teens are ghosting after discovering

fermented rinds along the foundation of the Trump tower.

Live polls show the public is divided on this issue.

We have two sides battling for a decision on what to do.

So, what is the solution here?

49% of Americans argue that each Brisbane pickled summit fox was quickly entertained

before packing.

This demographic takes pride in their focus on the powerful padded hinds, and strongly

believe Americans will feel the results.

Currently on the winning side, 51% of Americans believe that the Trump Administration should

not be storing fermented rinds where inner city teens can access them.

As we have seen, it's causing an itchy outbreak, and parents are riled up.

SWAT has been deployed to handle the most aggressive units.

Chief Tamerian reports his team is currently containing the steaming worm-like appendage.

Even as it flew back and forth, knocking over the metal tray and bursting the ceiling lights

before struggling to detach its roots from the tattered, foamy carcass.

Those who disagree with the Trump administration's choices here may be correct, but in our editorial

opinion, the more pressing issue here is that one can't expect to pin a horse whisperer

to the hay and rub two salted limes into their sockets.

I'd love to know your thoughts.

How is the government shutdown affecting you?

Have you encountered any fermented rinds or splined, rusted pecking towers?

Let us know in the comment section below, and be sure to absolutely SMASH that like

button, and subscribe for more FREE pattern interrupts.

For your health!

For more infomation >> [HARSH TRUTH] The REAL reason US Government Shutdown isn't over - Duration: 2:33.

-------------------------------------------

Groundhog Day 2019: What is the story behind the BIZARRE annual US tradition? - Duration: 5:14.

 Groundhog Day has its origins in a Christian holiday called Candlemas. Candlemas is a Christian Holy Day commemorating the presentation of Jesus at the Temple

It is based upon the account of the presentation of Jesus in Luke :–4. Related articles Groundhog Day 19: When is Groundhog Day and what is it? Groundhog Day 19 forecast: Will USA see six more weeks of WINTER?  The Candlemas festival involved faithful Christians carrying candles to church to have them blessed

 The blessings were supposed to help protect households for the duration of winter

 According to the Candlemas tradition, if the weather was still and calm during the festival winter would return again

 However, if conditions were blustery and chilly, winter would not come back for another year

 READ MORE: Groundhog Day 19: When does the groundhog emerge on Groundhog Day? The myth's migration to Germany saw the introduction of a hedgehog - if the hedgehog was to observe his own shadow on the day, winter would come around once again for six weeks

 Today's Groundhog Day tradition follows a similar logic, with the strange myth saying a native rodent can predict the severity of the winter

 Once the German people made their own migration to the US, they brought their superstitions with them, and the native groundhog became the deciding rodent

 Now, tradition dictates people take the journey to Punxsutawney, to resident groundhog Punxsutawney Phil and his extended family

 READ MORE: Groundhog Day 19 date, time, how to watch: When is Groundhog Day? Related articles Groundhog Day 19: When is Groundhog day - what is it? Groundhog Day 19: When is Groundhog Day in the US this year?  These days in the US Groundhog Day focuses on witnessing a rodent emerge from its burrow to supposedly predict the weather for the rest of winter

 One groundhog going by the name of Punxsutawney Phil will emerge from the ground on February , and according to legend, could plunge the US into another six weeks of winter

 The day deciding whether or not this will happen is known as Groundhog Day, celebrated in the US State of Pennsylvania

 The first-ever Groundhog Day was marked at Gobler's Knob, Punxsutawney on February , 1887

 A local journalist Clymer Freas came up with the concept after quipping Phil was America's official groundhog meteorologist

 However, Phil's predictions only hit the mark percent of the time. Thousands of people will flock to Punxsutawney today to witness groundhog Phil emerge from his underground abode

 Many more will witness the strange event on Groundhog Day TV. The festival even inspired the famous 1993 Bill Murray film, Groundhog Day

For more infomation >> Groundhog Day 2019: What is the story behind the BIZARRE annual US tradition? - Duration: 5:14.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. and China make progress in their trade talks, but hurdles still remain - Duration: 1:01.

Earlier in the week,... Washington and Beijing wrapped up their two day meeting on trade,...

but it looks like there are still differences that need to be ironed out.

Chinese state news agency Xinhua reported that the two sides made important progress

during the talks,... where Beijing agreed to increase U.S. agricultural imports like

soybeans,... as well as energy and industrial goods and services.

The two sides also agreed to strengthen cooperation on intellectual property rights and technology

transfers.

But several U.S. media outlets said differences regarding China's structural reforms, including

changes on industrial and trade policies,... still remain.

President Trump said Friday local time that no final deal will be made until he meets

his Chinese counterpart Xi Jin-ping.

The summit is reportedly being planned for late February,... before the 90 day trade

truce agreed by the two leaders ends on March 1st.

For more infomation >> U.S. and China make progress in their trade talks, but hurdles still remain - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. and China make progress in their trade talks, but major hurdles still remain - Duration: 0:59.

Earlier in the week,... Washington and Beijing wrapped up their two day meeting on trade,...

but it looks like there is still a lot of work left to be done.

China's Xinhua News Agency reported that the two sides made important progress during the

talks,... where Beijing agreed to increase U.S. imports of agriculture, energy, industrial

products and services.

The two sides also agreed to strengthen cooperation on intellectual property rights and technology

transfers.

But several U.S. media outlets, citing government sources, said differences regarding Beijing's

structural reforms,... including changes on industrial and trade policies,... still remain.

President Trump said no final deal will be made until he meets his Chinese counterpart

Xi Jinping,... reportedly being planned for late February.

U.S. trade negotiators are set to visit China later this month for another round of talks,

and to possibly prepare for a meeting between the two presidents.

For more infomation >> U.S. and China make progress in their trade talks, but major hurdles still remain - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

Local immigration rights activist forced to leave the U.S. - Duration: 1:37.

For more infomation >> Local immigration rights activist forced to leave the U.S. - Duration: 1:37.

-------------------------------------------

Pentagon Increases Drone Use On US Soil As US Becomes Police State - Duration: 4:22.

The Pentagon has published new data detailing their domestic drone usage here in the United

States, specifically drone usage for the year 28, and what they've released shows us that

on 11 different occasions, 11, they use their military drones for operations here in the

United States 11 times in one year.

Now you may not think that's a lot, right?

I mean we have 11,000 drones that we use here and abroad and we only had to use them 11

times on our own soil in 12 months.

That's not bad, right?

Well, it actually is.

When you consider that in the entire eight year period prior to 2018, we only use drones

on domestic soil a grand total of 11 times over eight years, but now under trump's direction

at the Pentagon, we've used them 11 times in the last 12 months.

Some of this is innocuous enough.

Okay.

Some of it.

One operation was for monitoring and detailing wildfires in California.

Another one was from monitoring wildfires in Oregon.

One of them was a for Colorado.

Two of them were for hurricane damage surveillance, so there's five.

That means there's six, six military drone operations here in the United States that

we're not just for gathering surveillance on, on damaging things that could harm American

citizens.

Now, some of those six and some of these actually went on for months at a time over five months,

uh, was surveillance of the border.

Yeah, tracking down those illegal immigrants, those alleged caravans just running those

military drones up and down.

They're looking for people that we could go and arrest the remaining missions will.

We still don't have a clear picture of what those were yet.

But let me tell you something.

This is terrifying.

I, this is literally big brother on an airplane.

Big Brother flying over us watching what we're doing

and it gets even worse because last year a former defense secretary, Jim Mattis actually

issued a new memo, changed the rules saying that I, the secretary of defense for the United

States no longer has to be the person to authorize drone missions.

Prior to this memo.

If there was a drone mission, whether it was on us soil or abroad, secretary of defense

had to be the one to issue.

It matters, changed it, and he said, you know what, any high ranking military official can

do it.

You know what?

Let's go a step further to.

Governors of states can now use our military drones at their own discretion.

You got a problem with riots?

Send in the military drone.

Oh, you think there's some civil unrest somewhere?

Send in the military drone.

These things are armed to the teeth.

They've got all kinds of surveillance equipment.

You can just monitor people.

Twenty four slash seven, giving them the illusion of security when in reality we have completely

sacrificed our own freedoms and that's what this is about.

This is a massive civil liberties abuse.

It's taking place at the hands of the trump administration and they want to do it more

frequently and based on what the Pentagon said they did in 2018, it's become obvious

that they are doing it more frequently, which means 2019 this year, I'm willing to bet we

beat that number of 11 domestic missions probably before Halloween of this year.

For more infomation >> Pentagon Increases Drone Use On US Soil As US Becomes Police State - Duration: 4:22.

-------------------------------------------

US arrests China-linked 'birth tourism' operators - Duration: 5:30.

For more infomation >> US arrests China-linked 'birth tourism' operators - Duration: 5:30.

-------------------------------------------

Looking ahead to the State of the Union - Duration: 10:24.

ROBERT COSTA: Hello. I'm Robert Costa. And this is the Washington Week Podcast.

The State of the Union address is next week Tuesday, after a 35-day shutdown and with

negotiations to avert another are pretty much going nowhere. So what is the state of the union?

We have a great panel assembled to break it all down: Peter Baker, chief White House

correspondent for The New York Times; Shawna Thomas, Washington bureau chief for Vice

News; Nancy Cordes, chief congressional correspondent for CBS News; and Bob Woodward,

Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, and author, and associate editor at The Washington Post.

The annual State of the Union address is an event infused with history and politics.

Last year women there wore black to honor the #MeToo movement.

Guests are often invited by both sides to make a political point.

This year an undocumented worker, a former employee at one of the president's clubs, will

be in the audience. The first DACA recipient to become a Rhodes scholar will also be there.

Democrat Stacey Abrams, who narrowly lost her bid to be the first African-American female

governor, will give the Democratic response. The president had this to say about Ms. Abrams.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) Oh, I campaigned against Stacey Abrams.

I know that President Obama campaigned for her, Michelle Obama campaigned for her, and

Oprah campaigned for her, and all Brian had was me, and he won fairly easily - you know,

fairly easily. So I hope that she does a good job. I mean, I respect her.

I don't know her, I haven't met her, but I hope she does a good job.

ROBERT COSTA: Nancy, based on your reporting roaming around the Capitol talking to

lawmakers, what do they want to hear from the president, the Republicans?

NANCY CORDES: Well, they'd like to her him make a case for an agenda that goes beyond a

border wall because, frankly, most Republicans don't share his passion for a wall and,

you know, his single-minded focus on this has really sucked a lot of the oxygen out of

the room and it has prevented them from advancing the rest of their agenda on Capitol

Hill. They don't see it as a winning issue for them. They've seen all the public

polling that blames him and Republicans for the shutdown more so than Democrats.

They don't think that declaring an emergency or, heaven forbid, another shutdown is going

to be any better for them, so they would really like to move off of this issue and on to

something else. But the more time that goes on, the more the president digs in.

So I think that they expect that he will spend a significant amount of time in this State

of the Union saying the kinds of things that we heard him say in interviews with people

like Peter this week, you know, that he believes that this is, you know, the defining

security issue that the U.S. is facing and that there's - there will be terrible

ramifications if this wall isn't built. If anything, he seems to be getting more dug in.

ROBERT COSTA: Shawna, what about the moment for Speaker Pelosi and Stacey Abrams?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I think for Speaker Pelosi, I mean, one of the reasons why it was - would

be so awkward to have had the State of the Union during the government shutdown is that

she would have had to sit behind him as he was talking about the state of the union, and

the state of the union was part of it was shut down. But it will show that they are in

some ways on equal footing. He is coming to her House to give that State of the Union.

He is - she is allowing him to do that. It'll be interesting to see her face and the reactions on that.

I also think this is a moment much like when this new Congress was sworn in earlier this

year, that people are going to look around in those cutaways of the cameras, and you're

going to see the Democratic side and you're going to see the Republican side, and the

Democrats are going to be full of women and it's going to be full of people of color, and

the Republican side is going to be full of white men. And that contrast, especially as

the president is talking about immigration, is going to be quite stark. As for Stacey

Abrams, giving the Democratic response is - it's terrible. It's a terrible assignment.

Or giving the response in general; it's not just Democrats, it's whoever's on the other side.

PETER BAKER: They couldn't find anybody who actually has an office to give it.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Exactly. And also, the pomp and circumstance of the State of the Union,

no matter who is president, is great. The lighting is great. The circumstances are great.

And then you are always going to cut to someone in a diner or someone coming down the

stairs of their house. There's no way to win on this one, just on the pure optics.

NANCY CORDES: Awkwardly drinking your water. (Laughter.)

SHAWNA THOMAS: It's not good.

ROBERT COSTA: Marco Rubio, I remember that - Senator Rubio.

SHAWNA THOMAS: But I'm hoping for the best. (Laughter.)

ROBERT COSTA: Well, the Democrats would love to see Stacey Abrams run for Senate in Georgia in 2020.

SHAWNA THOMAS: So this is her chance to kind of get out there in some ways.

BOB WOODWARD: But let's face what this is and who Trump is. He truly has become - I

mean, looking at your wonderful interview with him, he is America's talk-show host, and

he is up there commenting on everything. He's got an idea. He's got an opinion.

Now, on the negative side, if he is going to do something to spend money for something

like a border wall, without that money being authorized by Congress, that is a real

serious step in the wrong direction for him, for the Constitution, for the kind of

rational government that we normally have. And so to pull that trigger is going to be a

big deal. And he kind intimated to you that he's going to do that, right?

I mean, what's that going to mean in the end? Not good for anyone.

ROBERT COSTA: Maybe he wants - if he's a theatrical person politically, maybe he wants

that moment at the State of the Union to declare a national emergency.

PETER BAKER: It might be. We asked him whether he would let out - he'd let the current

talks play out first. And he said, yes, I'll wait till February 15th. He could obviously do it.

I don't think he will. But he does like the State of the Union. He is a showman, right?

This is - he is theatrical. It is actually, we're told by advisors, one of the reasons

he agreed to reopen the government, because he didn't want to lose this moment.

It's the best moment of a year for a president, where they get to outline their agenda.

The trick is, it's going to be, what we hear, a mix of confrontation and conciliation,

right? He will at least try, according to his aides, say things like: We can work together

on infrastructure. We can work together on prescription drugs. There are things that

President Trump and a Democratic House, anyway, could find in common.

But as long as this festering sore of the border wall fight is there, that's going to

still dominate and make it hard for him to make that pivot.

NANCY CORDES: I do think that the State of the Union loses a little bit of its power

when you're in divided government, because when Republicans controlled the White House,

the House and the Senate, you're parsing every sentence because you're looking for clues

about what he and the party writ large are going to do over the next year.

You know, now he's not going to be able to do a lot of those things anyway, no matter how

he talks about them. And really, you know, the only major policy initiatives that are

going to get over the finish line are those that Democrats share with Republicans.

And so I agree with you, that it is going to be all about, you know, those areas of

agreement. And does he just pay lip service to, yeah, prescription drugs and infrastructure,

and we all want that? Or is there going to be some, you know, actual specific note of

compromise that will give people hope that maybe these two sides can find that compromise?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I'm not sure - but I'm not sure sort of politically the Democrats want to

find that compromise with him, even on things like infrastructure and prescription drugs,

that we all kind of agree are issues that need to be dealt with in this country.

Part of - part of the wall issue, and part of making it a moral issue, is about, to them,

to many of them, the wall is seen as racist because of his rhetoric beforehand.

And it is hard, especially with some of these freshmen Democrats, to separate that from

anything else that they have to do.

PETER BAKER: Right. He's a toxic figure on the left. And any compromise with him by leadership

will only get the Nancy Pelosi leadership in trouble with, you know, the AOCs of the Congress.

ROBERT COSTA: And the Democratic Party's already getting a little bit of a riptide from

the 2020 presidential race.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Exactly. There's already a thousand senators running for president on

the Democratic side. (Laughter.) That is not an exact number, clearly.

(Laughter.) But they are not - they can't really, in a Democratic primary, be seen as

compromising with the president of the United States, at least not currently.

ROBERT COSTA: Bob.

BOB WOODWARD: Yeah. Where's the high road in this? I'm not sure.

SHAWNA THOMAS: I haven't found one.

ROBERT COSTA: What about the no road, Bob? I mean, you've been a student of the

presidency, a reporter on the presidency for so long. And I wonder, has the State of

the Union been played out? Nancy Pelosi, the speaker, cancelled it for a couple weeks.

And some observers said -

BOB WOODWARD: And there were lots of people just sad and -

SHAWNA THOMAS: And we don't miss it. (Laughter.)

BOB WOODWARD: - and could not even get through the day waiting for that State of the

Union. (Laughter.) First, Trump normally does not like these scripted performances, as

Peter knows. But in fact, and I don't know the details on this - you would, all of

you - he has some good speech writers. He actually can deliver rhetorically. So if he

brings that - and I hope the speechwriters will call me tomorrow. (Laughter.) I would like to -

ROBERT COSTA: Get a little scoop.

BOB WOODWARD: I would like to speak to them. (Laughter.) I'll put out my phone number.

NANCY CORDES: They might be calling you right now.

PETER BAKER: They may have been calling you before.

BOB WOODWARD: Yes. That's maybe what it was. (Laughter.) No, it was not. But it's -

ROBERT COSTA: Woodward never reveals his sources. (Laughter.)

BOB WOODWARD: But the invitation for sources to come forward is always there.

NANCY CORDES: For all of us. For all of us. (Laughter.)

ROBERT COSTA: All right. Well, we'll all be watching Tuesday.

That's it for this edition of the Washington Week Podcast.

You can listen wherever you get your podcast or watch on the Washington Week website.

While you're online check out our Washington Week-ly News Quiz.

I'm Robert Costa. Thanks for joining us and we'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> Looking ahead to the State of the Union - Duration: 10:24.

-------------------------------------------

US Dime 1958 D - 137 Million Made - United States 10 Cents - Duration: 5:26.

Hello all of you coin aficionados out there and Welcome to the DC Coin World International Coin Channel

Today we have the 1958 D Roosevelt dime

and as you can see we're looking at the back or the reverse first

It says United States of America - e pluribus unum

there is a olive sprig here with some olives on it

a oak branch here with an acorn or two on it

and then at the bottom it says ONE DIME in the center is a torch and down here

at the base of the torch on our left is a D

when you look at these in terms of appraising them for value one of the most important things is

number one: that you see the lines going down the torch which we really can't see much on here

and the other is that these bands going across are full and that you

can see them because that's where the wire comes on these so we not only don't

have good bands on here we don't have good lines here we don't have much

definition in the flame and we have a pretty worn coin so this is not going to

be extremely valuable to a collector However! this 1958 coin is made of silver

so it's 98 90% silver 10% copper. In its silver value alone it's worth about

a $1.20 just in silver bullion value if you melted it down

so what that means is that people do melt them down or did melt them down

and there aren't as many of these around so even though they made a hundred and thirty-six and a half million of these in 1958

these are still very collectible as coins

they are priced anywhere from $2 so this one's probably worth $2 here up to about 22 to 30 dollars

I've seen one as an MS 67 which is the highest grading I guess there's

an MS 67 plus but ms 67 that sold for about $90 85 to 90 doll

so this one would not even be it well it might I guess you could say it might be

in fine but I don't think. So I think it it may be good - very good

so even if good - very good this coin is worth about $2 to a collector because

they're hard to get and they are silver if we look at the coin itself on the

front it says Liberty here you can see Franklin Roosevelt faced into the left

to the here lines here the definition of the ER is another thing you look for you

can see these lines in his eyes and kind of the eyebrows and eyelashes so this

coin has some definition but not the best under his chin it says In God We

Trust back here says 1958 kind that big stylized five and then down here

underneath it says JS and that's the engraver of this coin John Sinnock

who was the chief engraver I believe at the US Mint for years

and you see a lot of JSs on the coins from the US Mint so in 1958

As I said the Denver Mint made a 137 million which is far more than Philadelphia

so if you can find one on the back that has nothing here it's from the Philadelphia Mint

it may be slightly more valuable and the reason for that is that the Philadelphia Mint

Didn't use the P mint mark back then Philadelphia mint only made 30.7 million

whereas the Denver Mint made a hundred and thirty seven

Essentially Philadelphia made one-fourth as many so if you find one without the D

here that's gonna be a little bit more collectible

essentially it would make this coin here from being worth $2.00 to being worth $2.25

but a higher grade than this it would make it significantly more valuable

If it didn't have the D mint mark on the back

This coin as I said is 90% silver 10% copper it is 2.5 grams in weight

17.9 millimeters in diameter in 1.1 millimeters in thickness

it was minted from 1946 until 1964. So what happened in 1964 well after 1964

they kept the coin but they changed its makeup so from 1965 on they were not

silver coins so if you get this coin from 1964 or before it's gonna be worth a couple bucks

if you get it after 1964 it's probably going to be worth a dime unless

it's some kind of specialty coin or an incredibly good condition and the melt

value after 1964 is going to be in the 1 to 2 cent range rather than the $1.20

range for the melt value in this coin all right that's all we have today from

a DC Coin World International Coin Channel we'd love to have you subscribe

to our Channel and if you have any comments please leave them in the comment section

For more infomation >> US Dime 1958 D - 137 Million Made - United States 10 Cents - Duration: 5:26.

-------------------------------------------

Trump withdraws US from INF arms treaty with Russia - Duration: 4:50.

For more infomation >> Trump withdraws US from INF arms treaty with Russia - Duration: 4:50.

-------------------------------------------

Critics say U.S. withdrawal from INF could spark a new arms race with Russia - Duration: 5:01.

JUDY WOODRUFF: As we reported, the Trump administration announced today that the U.S. would officially

suspend participation in the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, or INF, beginning tomorrow.

As Nick Schifrin reports, that starts a six-month window for Russia and the U.S. to either make

a last-minute deal or lose a landmark agreement that helped reduce Cold War tensions.

RONALD REAGAN, President of the United States: For the first time in history, the language

of arms control was replaced by arms reduction.

NICK SCHIFRIN: It was 1987, and President Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev

laid a cornerstone of nuclear arms reduction, a treaty that eliminated an entire class of

U.S. and Soviet missiles.

RONALD REAGAN: Today, on this vital issue at least, we have seen what can be accomplished

when we pull together.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Both sides removed thousands of warheads and destroyed ground-launched

missiles with a range of 300 to 3,400 miles.

But for the last few years, the U.S. says Russia has developed and deployed this missile,

on display last week in Moscow, that violates the treaty, and Russia refused U.S. requests

to destroy it.

Today, President Trump said, as long as Russia wasn't abiding by the treaty, neither would

the U.S.

DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States: Unless we're going to have something that

we all agree to, we can't be put at the disadvantage of going by a treaty, limiting what we do,

when somebody else doesn't go by that treaty.

NICK SCHIFRIN: But the Russians say this American missile defense system in Romania could be

modified to launch an offensive missile, and, therefore, the U.S. is the violator.

Today, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov called the U.S. suspension a mistake.

SERGEI RYABKOV, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister (through translator): We think that the agreement

is essential.

It is within interests of our security and European security, and it would be irresponsible

for one side to shatter it.

FEDERICA MOGHERINI, Foreign Policy Chief, European Union: Europe has been probably the

one that has benefited the most.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Today, NATO backed the U.S. accusation against Russia, but some European

officials, like E.U.

Foreign Policy Chief Federica Mogherini, fear the start of a new arms race.

From the late '70s through the late '80s, the Soviet Union and U.S. deployed mobile

nuclear-tipped missiles to Europe.

The INF eliminated them, and European officials say they don't want to turn back the clock.

FEDERICA MOGHERINI: What we definitely don't want to see is our continent going back to

being a battlefield or a place where other superpowers confront themselves.

This belongs to a faraway history.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Senior administration officials say they have no plans to acquire or deploy

intermediate-range missiles to Europe, or anywhere else.

But the Pentagon has a research and development program into new missiles ready to go, and

a NATO official tells "PBS NewsHour" the U.S. has raised the idea of testing a new non-nuclear

ground-launched cruise missile this year.

THOMAS COUNTRYMAN, Former U.S. Undersecretary of State: I think that ultimately will cause

some unnecessary friction with our best friends in the world.

That is the allies in NATO.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Tom Countryman was the Obama administration's top arms control official.

He says today's U.S. decision is a mistake, because it doesn't solve the problem: the

Russian missile that violates the treaty and threatens Europe.

THOMAS COUNTRYMAN: It doesn't address the European security disadvantage created by

the new Russian deployment, and, secondly, because it allows Russia to get out of this

treaty that has served us and European interests well, while blaming the United States.

NICK SCHIFRIN: But Russia's not the only country that fields intermediate-range missiles.

U.S. officials say China and Iran each have more than 1,000 missiles that would violate

the INF, if they were party to it, raising questions about the future of intermediate

missiles and arms control.

The U.S. is currently debating what to do about the New START treaty that limits the

number of strategic nuclear weapons.

U.S. officials predict a divide between National Security Adviser John Bolton, critical of

arms control, and Pentagon officials, who favor extending New START.

Today, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the U.S. was only interested in extending

the treaty if:

MIKE POMPEO, U.S. Secretary of State: It protects the American people, protects our allies around

the world as well, and has provisions that other countries are both capable and willing

to comply with, and allow us to verify that they have complied with those agreements.

Absent that, it's just sitting around a table talking.

NICK SCHIFRIN: In 1987, years of talking allowed the two titans of the Cold War a little banter

over an old Reagan line.

RONALD REAGAN: The maxim is (SPEAKING RUSSIAN).

Trust, but verify.

(LAUGHTER)

NICK SCHIFRIN: Today, the U.S. and Russia have little trust and won't let each other

verify.

And both countries are preparing for a future without the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces

Treaty.

For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Nick Schifrin.

For more infomation >> Critics say U.S. withdrawal from INF could spark a new arms race with Russia - Duration: 5:01.

-------------------------------------------

Looking ahead to the State of the Union - Duration: 10:24.

ROBERT COSTA: Hello. I'm Robert Costa. And this is the Washington Week Podcast.

The State of the Union address is next week Tuesday, after a 35-day shutdown and with

negotiations to avert another are pretty much going nowhere. So what is the state of the union?

We have a great panel assembled to break it all down: Peter Baker, chief White House

correspondent for The New York Times; Shawna Thomas, Washington bureau chief for Vice

News; Nancy Cordes, chief congressional correspondent for CBS News; and Bob Woodward,

Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, and author, and associate editor at The Washington Post.

The annual State of the Union address is an event infused with history and politics.

Last year women there wore black to honor the #MeToo movement.

Guests are often invited by both sides to make a political point.

This year an undocumented worker, a former employee at one of the president's clubs, will

be in the audience. The first DACA recipient to become a Rhodes scholar will also be there.

Democrat Stacey Abrams, who narrowly lost her bid to be the first African-American female

governor, will give the Democratic response. The president had this to say about Ms. Abrams.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) Oh, I campaigned against Stacey Abrams.

I know that President Obama campaigned for her, Michelle Obama campaigned for her, and

Oprah campaigned for her, and all Brian had was me, and he won fairly easily - you know,

fairly easily. So I hope that she does a good job. I mean, I respect her.

I don't know her, I haven't met her, but I hope she does a good job.

ROBERT COSTA: Nancy, based on your reporting roaming around the Capitol talking to

lawmakers, what do they want to hear from the president, the Republicans?

NANCY CORDES: Well, they'd like to her him make a case for an agenda that goes beyond a

border wall because, frankly, most Republicans don't share his passion for a wall and,

you know, his single-minded focus on this has really sucked a lot of the oxygen out of

the room and it has prevented them from advancing the rest of their agenda on Capitol

Hill. They don't see it as a winning issue for them. They've seen all the public

polling that blames him and Republicans for the shutdown more so than Democrats.

They don't think that declaring an emergency or, heaven forbid, another shutdown is going

to be any better for them, so they would really like to move off of this issue and on to

something else. But the more time that goes on, the more the president digs in.

So I think that they expect that he will spend a significant amount of time in this State

of the Union saying the kinds of things that we heard him say in interviews with people

like Peter this week, you know, that he believes that this is, you know, the defining

security issue that the U.S. is facing and that there's - there will be terrible

ramifications if this wall isn't built. If anything, he seems to be getting more dug in.

ROBERT COSTA: Shawna, what about the moment for Speaker Pelosi and Stacey Abrams?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I think for Speaker Pelosi, I mean, one of the reasons why it was - would

be so awkward to have had the State of the Union during the government shutdown is that

she would have had to sit behind him as he was talking about the state of the union, and

the state of the union was part of it was shut down. But it will show that they are in

some ways on equal footing. He is coming to her House to give that State of the Union.

He is - she is allowing him to do that. It'll be interesting to see her face and the reactions on that.

I also think this is a moment much like when this new Congress was sworn in earlier this

year, that people are going to look around in those cutaways of the cameras, and you're

going to see the Democratic side and you're going to see the Republican side, and the

Democrats are going to be full of women and it's going to be full of people of color, and

the Republican side is going to be full of white men. And that contrast, especially as

the president is talking about immigration, is going to be quite stark. As for Stacey

Abrams, giving the Democratic response is - it's terrible. It's a terrible assignment.

Or giving the response in general; it's not just Democrats, it's whoever's on the other side.

PETER BAKER: They couldn't find anybody who actually has an office to give it.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Exactly. And also, the pomp and circumstance of the State of the Union,

no matter who is president, is great. The lighting is great. The circumstances are great.

And then you are always going to cut to someone in a diner or someone coming down the

stairs of their house. There's no way to win on this one, just on the pure optics.

NANCY CORDES: Awkwardly drinking your water. (Laughter.)

SHAWNA THOMAS: It's not good.

ROBERT COSTA: Marco Rubio, I remember that - Senator Rubio.

SHAWNA THOMAS: But I'm hoping for the best. (Laughter.)

ROBERT COSTA: Well, the Democrats would love to see Stacey Abrams run for Senate in Georgia in 2020.

SHAWNA THOMAS: So this is her chance to kind of get out there in some ways.

BOB WOODWARD: But let's face what this is and who Trump is. He truly has become - I

mean, looking at your wonderful interview with him, he is America's talk-show host, and

he is up there commenting on everything. He's got an idea. He's got an opinion.

Now, on the negative side, if he is going to do something to spend money for something

like a border wall, without that money being authorized by Congress, that is a real

serious step in the wrong direction for him, for the Constitution, for the kind of

rational government that we normally have. And so to pull that trigger is going to be a

big deal. And he kind intimated to you that he's going to do that, right?

I mean, what's that going to mean in the end? Not good for anyone.

ROBERT COSTA: Maybe he wants - if he's a theatrical person politically, maybe he wants

that moment at the State of the Union to declare a national emergency.

PETER BAKER: It might be. We asked him whether he would let out - he'd let the current

talks play out first. And he said, yes, I'll wait till February 15th. He could obviously do it.

I don't think he will. But he does like the State of the Union. He is a showman, right?

This is - he is theatrical. It is actually, we're told by advisors, one of the reasons

he agreed to reopen the government, because he didn't want to lose this moment.

It's the best moment of a year for a president, where they get to outline their agenda.

The trick is, it's going to be, what we hear, a mix of confrontation and conciliation,

right? He will at least try, according to his aides, say things like: We can work together

on infrastructure. We can work together on prescription drugs. There are things that

President Trump and a Democratic House, anyway, could find in common.

But as long as this festering sore of the border wall fight is there, that's going to

still dominate and make it hard for him to make that pivot.

NANCY CORDES: I do think that the State of the Union loses a little bit of its power

when you're in divided government, because when Republicans controlled the White House,

the House and the Senate, you're parsing every sentence because you're looking for clues

about what he and the party writ large are going to do over the next year.

You know, now he's not going to be able to do a lot of those things anyway, no matter how

he talks about them. And really, you know, the only major policy initiatives that are

going to get over the finish line are those that Democrats share with Republicans.

And so I agree with you, that it is going to be all about, you know, those areas of

agreement. And does he just pay lip service to, yeah, prescription drugs and infrastructure,

and we all want that? Or is there going to be some, you know, actual specific note of

compromise that will give people hope that maybe these two sides can find that compromise?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I'm not sure - but I'm not sure sort of politically the Democrats want to

find that compromise with him, even on things like infrastructure and prescription drugs,

that we all kind of agree are issues that need to be dealt with in this country.

Part of - part of the wall issue, and part of making it a moral issue, is about, to them,

to many of them, the wall is seen as racist because of his rhetoric beforehand.

And it is hard, especially with some of these freshmen Democrats, to separate that from

anything else that they have to do.

PETER BAKER: Right. He's a toxic figure on the left. And any compromise with him by leadership

will only get the Nancy Pelosi leadership in trouble with, you know, the AOCs of the Congress.

ROBERT COSTA: And the Democratic Party's already getting a little bit of a riptide from

the 2020 presidential race.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Exactly. There's already a thousand senators running for president on

the Democratic side. (Laughter.) That is not an exact number, clearly.

(Laughter.) But they are not - they can't really, in a Democratic primary, be seen as

compromising with the president of the United States, at least not currently.

ROBERT COSTA: Bob.

BOB WOODWARD: Yeah. Where's the high road in this? I'm not sure.

SHAWNA THOMAS: I haven't found one.

ROBERT COSTA: What about the no road, Bob? I mean, you've been a student of the

presidency, a reporter on the presidency for so long. And I wonder, has the State of

the Union been played out? Nancy Pelosi, the speaker, cancelled it for a couple weeks.

And some observers said -

BOB WOODWARD: And there were lots of people just sad and -

SHAWNA THOMAS: And we don't miss it. (Laughter.)

BOB WOODWARD: - and could not even get through the day waiting for that State of the

Union. (Laughter.) First, Trump normally does not like these scripted performances, as

Peter knows. But in fact, and I don't know the details on this - you would, all of

you - he has some good speech writers. He actually can deliver rhetorically. So if he

brings that - and I hope the speechwriters will call me tomorrow. (Laughter.) I would like to -

ROBERT COSTA: Get a little scoop.

BOB WOODWARD: I would like to speak to them. (Laughter.) I'll put out my phone number.

NANCY CORDES: They might be calling you right now.

PETER BAKER: They may have been calling you before.

BOB WOODWARD: Yes. That's maybe what it was. (Laughter.) No, it was not. But it's -

ROBERT COSTA: Woodward never reveals his sources. (Laughter.)

BOB WOODWARD: But the invitation for sources to come forward is always there.

NANCY CORDES: For all of us. For all of us. (Laughter.)

ROBERT COSTA: All right. Well, we'll all be watching Tuesday.

That's it for this edition of the Washington Week Podcast.

You can listen wherever you get your podcast or watch on the Washington Week website.

While you're online check out our Washington Week-ly News Quiz.

I'm Robert Costa. Thanks for joining us and we'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> Looking ahead to the State of the Union - Duration: 10:24.

-------------------------------------------

US must continue to pressure Maduro regime in Venezuela: Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart - Duration: 7:25.

For more infomation >> US must continue to pressure Maduro regime in Venezuela: Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart - Duration: 7:25.

-------------------------------------------

World War 3: US vows 'MILITARY response' against Russia after scrapping INF nuclear treaty - Duration: 5:16.

 Trump announced his withdrawal from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty on Friday in a move which threatens to undermine peace and stability between Russia and the US

The President said the nuclear weapons accord, struck between the US and the Soviet Union in 1987, had been violated by Moscow because of the development of a new missile

But Moscow maintains it is not in breach of the treaty. Related articles  Railing against Vladimir Putin's Russia, Trump accused the superpower of flouting the INF accord

 The inflammatory accusations have sent tensions soaring between the two world powers amid ominous threats of retaliation

 US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo first announced on Friday the Trump administration's decision to officially suspend its compliance with the 1987 treaty

 The US accused Russia of developing a new missile that would breach the banned 31-to-3,4-mile range limit for land-based systems, with the senior diplomat arguing "Russia's violation puts millions of Europeans and Americans at greater risk" and "aims to put the United States at a military disadvantage"

 READ MORE: Trump RIPS-UP NUKES TREATY keeping nuclear bombs out of UK and Europe Trump's ensuing statement asserted the US "will not remain constrained by its terms while Russia misrepresents its actions"

 The President said: "We cannot be the only country in the world unilaterally bound by this treaty, or any other

 "We will move forward with developing our own military response options and will work with NATO and our other allies and partners to deny Russia any military advantage from its unlawful conduct

" However, Russia has rejected claims its Novator 9M79 missile flouted the rules of the historic INF accord

Related articles  The superstate even exhibited the weapon earlier this year in a bid to refute the accusations

 The White House first revealed it would leave the INF treaty in October 18. Talks to save the peace deal broke down this week, with Mr Pompeo saying on Friday the US would officially scrap the accord in 18 days

 But Moscow attacked Washington's decision to leave the INF, with President Putin pleading to "restore balance" in the military sphere

 Both powers warned of retaliatory measures that would be taken should the other attempt to deploy new medium-range missile systems

 US Nato ambassador Kay Bailey Hutchison told reporters in October if the 9M79 "became capable of delivering," then the Western military alliance would "be looking at the capability to take out a missile that could hit any of our countries in Europe and hit America"

 Later that same month, Putin warned European countries complicit in US missile positions "they will be subjecting their own territory to the threat of a possible retaliatory strike"

For more infomation >> World War 3: US vows 'MILITARY response' against Russia after scrapping INF nuclear treaty - Duration: 5:16.

-------------------------------------------

Venezuela isnt Syria Why the US shouldnt overreact to Putins bluff - Duration: 1:58.

Venezuela isnt Syria Why the US shouldnt overreact to Putins bluff

Putin has much to gain from this move: Venezuela under Maduro gives him an opportunity to flex Russias muscles and needle the US in the Western Hemisphere, while affording economic inroads for Russia.

But there are limits to how far Putin will go, and the US shouldnt get too worked up by what Russias power move amounts to: a bluff.

Sometimes Putins bets on authoritarian leaders turn out well, others not so. Putins military intervention in Syria in September 2015 proved decisive in saving the murderous Bashar al Assad and keeping him in power to this day. Putins backing for former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych ended with Yanukovych fleeing power in 2014 and Ukraine more pro Western than ever, albeit at great cost because of Putins ensuing invasion.

Moscow relishes opportunities to challenge the US. Doing so in support of a dictator less than 1,500 miles away from Miami is especially enticing for Putin. Given Putins belief that the West has meddled in Russias neighborhood in Georgia and Ukraine, he sees Venezuela as an opportunity to return the favor to the United States.

Russian support for Venezuela comes in the form of public messaging aimed at chipping away American credibility. At the UN Security Council on Saturday where Venezuela was the focus of debate, Russias representative, Vasily Nebenzya, blasted the US for trying "to engineer a coup detat in Venezuela."

"If anything represents a threat to peace and security," Nebenzya stated, "it is the shameless and aggressive actions of the United States and their allies to oust a legitimately elected President of Venezuela."

Similar warnings have come from other Russian officials, with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov denouncing the US "destructive policy" on Venezuela for recognizing Guaido over Maduro. Following a phone call between Maduro and Putin, the Kremlin complained about "destructive outside interference." In a claim rich with hypocrisy given Putins violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of neighboring Georgia and Ukraine, the Kremlin statement went on to warn that the US and others "grossly trample fundamental norms of international law."

Rhetoric is not the only means by which Putin has supported Maduro and his predecessor, Hugo Chavez. Over the past decade, the Kremlin has sent Caracas billions of dollars estimates range from dollar 17 billion to dollar 25 billion to prop up Maduros and before that, Chavezs regime. Rosnefts head and Putin ally Igor Sechin has paid numerous visits to Caracas as a show of Russian support for Maduro. Rosneft has claimed sizable stakes in Venezuelan gas and oil fields. Still, recent US oil sanctions against Venezuela have already caused pause among Russian energy firms. Russias Lukoil reportedly suspended contracts with Venezuelas state owned oil company Petróleos de Venezuela as a result.

The Venezuelan military, whose support has been vital to Maduro, has strong ties to the Russian military. Two Russian nuclear capable, long range Russian bombers flew to Venezuela in December, and arms sales from Russia to Venezuela have been steady. More recently, around 400 Russian contractors landed in Venezuela to provide personal protection for Maduro, .

Despite this support, Venezuela is not Syria, where Russia had a long standing base and was in a position with nearby forces to intervene in that conflict. Russias ability to project power in a serious way in Venezuela, a country thousands of miles away from Moscow, is virtually non existent. Accordingly, while Russia can come to Maduros support in the UN, Russia should not be hyped into a decisive player on the ground in Venezuela.

Moreover, Russia faces weaknesses at home. Its economy is stagnant, and the government last year decided for financial reasons to increase the age for pension eligibility in an extremely unpopular move. How then can the Kremlin justify sending billions of dollars to prop up Maduro? Putins disapproval rating has climbed to levels unseen since before his invasion of Ukraine, according to and while 34 percent disapproval would be good enough for any Western leader, those are historically weak numbers for Putin, in a country where polling is difficult and citizens might be afraid to tell a stranger they dont like Putin. A reckless military adventure and possible loss of Russian lives in far away Venezuela wont help Putins ratings.

Russia opposition activist Alexei Navalny that Venezuelas revolution means that billions of dollars "of our money that was invested over there will disappear." In a few months, Navalny predicted, Maduro may wind up seeking refuge in Moscow.

With Russia propping up his opponent, how can Guaido best handle the situation?

To avoid unnecessary problems with Moscow, Guaido should indicate that he will review all deals with outside powers, including with Russia, to ensure they serve the interests of the Venezuelan people, not a corrupt ruling class. By stating respect for investments and rule of law, Guaido would remove any automatic nullification of deals signed with Russia unless those deals were done for the sole benefit of Maduro and those around him.

The US should not overreact to Putins bluff. Instead,Washington should focus on working with the international community to maintain and shore up support for democracy in Venezuela.

The Russian government is not alone in sticking with Maduro, but Putins support for his Venezuelan counterpart is but the latest example of his standing by a murderous ruler who has destroyed his country for the sole purpose of staying in power and robbing it blind. The two have much in common.

For more infomation >> Venezuela isnt Syria Why the US shouldnt overreact to Putins bluff - Duration: 1:58.

-------------------------------------------

US| Ex Starbucks boss Howard Schultzs presidential roll out went badly - Duration: 6:00.

US| Ex Starbucks boss Howard Schultzs presidential roll out went badly

Former chief touted his background — but the billionaires overall performance got a big Bronx cheer from political analysts.

Larry Sabato, the long time University of Virginia political science guru, burst out laughing — at some length — when CNBC asked him to evaluate how Schultz did in introducing himself to the American public as the nations next potential president during a whirlwind series of media interviews.

"Im sorry," Sabato said, as he continued chuckling.

"Long and short: The rollout has been good in the sense that he has been introduced to millions of people who have never heard of him," Sabato said. "I had to learn how to spell his name."

"But the downside of his rollout is that millions almost immediately took a strong dislike to him for different reasons, something that apparently Schultz and his high paid consultants arent noticing," Sabato added.

Those consultants include , a former advisor to President .

"The truth is the guy has announced for president, gotten enormous amount of coverage, and doesnt appear to have support from anybody," Sabato said.

Sabato and others said Schultz — who already was facing long odds of winning by saying that if he runs for the White House in 2020 it will be as an independent — hurt his chances during the week even further with a series of unforced errors. The former giant coffee chain CEO also opportunities left on the table, they said.

Analysts interviewed by CNBC cited the for risking throwing the election to President by siphoning off enough would be Democratic votes.

A day after announcing his potential bid Sunday, The incident was widely shared on social media.

Analysts also noted Schultzs own strong criticism of the Democratic Party, which they said risks alienating many voters that he likely would need to be able to win the election.

"It concerns me that so many voices within the Democratic Party are going so far to the left," Schultz said earlier this week. "If I ran as a Democrat, I would have to say things in my heart I do not believe."

And analysts said his focus on a platform committed to lowering the national debt is likely to fall flat with voters the election cycle, as opposed to the 1992 election when independent Ross Perot caught fire with a candidacy centered on that issue.

Then there is Schultzs vast wealth, lack of political experience and his charisma — or what analysts said was his lack thereof.

A spokesman for Schultz did not respond to a request for comment.

Sabato said that Schultz and his advisors "didnt seem to understand that most Americans arent looking for another white billionaire using bromides and buzzwords who has had zero experience in government."

"Weve already got one."

Robert Shapiro, a Columbia University professor who previously chaired the Department of Political Science there, said he believed Schultz may have made a strategic error by floating the idea of his candidacy too "early" in the election cycle.

"If youre running as an independent, you want to get attention and you want to have voters see where you fit in the political space," Shapiro said.

That is usually easiest, Shapiro said, when an independent has a good idea of who his opponents will be.

While Trump is very likely to be the Republican Partys nominee in 2020, the Democratic field is completely wide open and still might be so a full year from now.

"It does raise the question of if Schultzs strategy would be better if he first ran in the [Democratic] party and then ran as an independent afterward" if he failed to secure the nomination, Shapiro said.

He and other analysts noted that it is possible for Schultz, or another independent, to garner a significant share of the popular vote. Perot got 19 percent in 1992, after actually leading in public opinion polls at some point that year.

But Shapiro pointed out that Perot received "no electoral votes" that year despite his relatively strong showing in the popular vote.

The Electoral College determines who wins the presidency — not the popular vote.

It is possible for an independent to win electoral votes, as George Wallace did with 46 electoral votes in 1968. But if Schultz won enough votes to play the spoiler in 2020, and no candidate was able to score the 270 electoral votes needed win the presidency, the election would then be decided by the House of Representatives.

And "the House has Democrats and Republicans," Shapiro said.

David Barker, professor of government and director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University, said Schultzs "rollout went quite poorly." The former Starbucks CEO also seems to have overestimated the pool of voters who could be induced to vote for him, Barker said.

"The vast majority of independents are simply ideologues who do not want to identify with their natural party because they believe that party sells out too much or is too interested with protecting its power rather than pursuing particular ideological goals," Barker said.

"In other words, they dont like the party because the party is not pure enough."

But "the group of pure independents who are truly up for grabs is about 10 percent, and most of them are quite disengaged from politics so not necessarily voters," Barker said.

Lynn Vavreck, a professor of political science and communications studies at UCLA, said that she thinks that if Schultz "could have a do over" for his possible candidacy announcement, "he probably would take it."

She said she was struck by the difference between how Schultz announced his potential run for the White House during an interview with "60 Minutes" last Sunday, and how Trump announced his bid in 2015, and how Sens. Kamala Harris, D Calif., and Cory Booker, D N.J., did so this week.

"Those events" — the ones other than Schultzs — "looked like presidential campaign events," Vavreck said.

She noted that choices of the setting and production values, down to the the music, used for the announcements of Trump, Harris and Booker seemed to reflect a series level of planning by professional advisors around those candidates.

In contrast, she said, Shultzs interview "didnt have that professional feel ... I dont get the sense that he had a strategy or them to his message worked out with a key core, a key group of people."

"It doesnt signal to me ... that hes put a lot of effort into thinking about the run," Vavreck said.

She also was critical of Schultzs messaging on "60 Minutes" and in interviews later in the week.

"Mostly what I heard from him was a reaction to Democrats and Republicans and everything theyre doing wrong," Vavreck said.

She said that while its true that Congress ranks low in terms of public opinion, and many people have criticisms of the major parties, its a mistake to think that "I can go out and say those things and people will vote for me and Ill win."

Vavreck said presidential contenders have to have "a theme, a message."

"You have to give people a reason to vote for you, to be one of your team. Not just Im that guy, " she said. "People want to be with you for a cause. Not just because youre not something else."

Sabato, of the University of Virginia, said Schultzs failure to lay out a compelling message, or "a crusade ... that matters to people" and would get them to vote for him, indicates what is motivating Schultz to run as an independent.

"Its a vanity project, and thats his giant mistake," Sabato said "Heres what surprised me, is that with all of that money and all of that time and all of those high priced consultants, he comes on 60 Minutes and he talks about the debt? He thinks thats going to win him the presidency?"

Sabato said that a number of his political science students "didnt even know about him," even after the "60 Minutes" interview.

Those students who did know Schultz were underwhelmed.

"This one young lady said, He left me cold. Because there was nothing there, " Sabato recalled.

Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.

Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox

Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. 

© 2019 CNBC LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Data is a real time snapshot asterisk Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis.

Data also provided by

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét