During a Thursday appearance on Fox News, conservative commentator Mark Steyn strongly
criticized the acquittal of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, an illegal immigrant who was charged
in the 2015 murder of 32-year-old Kate Steinle.
As The Western Journal reported, Zarate had been deported multiple times prior to the
incident in which Steinle was killed.
Still, due to the fact that San Francisco is a sanctuary city for illegal immigrants,
Zarate was allowed to go free, despite federal officials requesting that he be detained and
then sent back to Mexico.
Steyn called Zarate's acquittal for the murder of Steinle a "miscarriage of justice,"
noting that her killer will never see justice.
"I think it is a miscarriage of justice in the profoundest sense in that Kate Steinle
is dead because she went for a walk in a popular destination in her own city and her parents
will never see anybody convicted for that crime," he said on "Tucker Carlson Tonight."
"There's no dispute — I mean, this is slightly different from the O.J. (Simpson)
case, where he pretended to look for the real killers for the last 20 years," Steyn added.
"There is no dispute that this guy actually fired the shot, or picked up the gun that
then shot itself and that this gunshot killed Kate Steinle.
And there's no dispute either that this man should not have been in the country, that
in fact he had been deported six times."
Zarate admitted that the shot that killed Steinle came from a gun he had been holding
at the time.
He said he found the firearm wrapped in a piece of cloth on a San Francisco pier and
picked it up.
Then, he said, the gun accidentally fired a bullet which ricocheted off the pier and
hit Steinle in the back, according to KGO.
But Steyn wasn't buying it.
"You don't need to import foreigners to add to your murderer population," he said.
"This guy had a grade-two education.
We're told that the reason he got off is apparently because he's too stupid to understand
what the cops were saying to him.
So he gave conflicting answers about treading on the gun, finding the gun, firing at sea
lions."
"Why are we importing, and why is one political party, the entire bureaucracy and two-thirds
of the remaining political party fetishizing and sentimentalizing immigrants who can't
speak the language with a grade-two education and setting up competing jurisdictions in
this country that protect them at the expense of American citizens?"
Steyn also argued the existence of sanctuary cities themselves, saying that the term itself
doesn't even make sense in context.
"The very term sanctuary city is designed to shut down the argument," he said.
"Because who do you give sanctuary to?
You give sanctuary to refugees, to those fleeing injustice."
"How can there be something called a sanctuary city," he asked, if it is only being used
as a safe haven for criminals?
He explained that "the reason Donald Trump is president is because he declined to operate
with those constraints."
"Most of the other Republican nominees two years ago," he said, were "cowed by that
kind of language, by 'sanctuary city,' and all the rest of it."
Trump himself responded to the verdict on Twitter, calling it "disgraceful."
"The Schumer/Pelosi Democrats are so weak on Crime that they will pay a big price in
the 2018 and 2020 Elections," he warned.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét