Thứ Bảy, 30 tháng 12, 2017

Auto news on Youtube Dec 30 2017

BREAKING!!

HE JUST DID IT…

Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY!

Dan Backer just pieced together an epic takedown of Hillary Clinton that's based on FEC reports,

memos by Clinton's campaign manager, and public statements from people like Donna Brazile

and many others who chose to speak out openly.

Could this information be the final stake in the heart of Hillary Clinton's alleged

crimes?

Let's analyze the information and see where it takes us.

The information dates back to 2014 when Shaun McCutcheon won favor from the Supreme Court.

As reported by Investors: "In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in favor

of my client, Alabama engineer Shaun McCutcheon, in his challenge to the Federal Election Commission's

(FEC) outdated "aggregate limits," which effectively limited how many candidates any

one donor could support.

Anti-speech liberals railed against McCutcheon's win, arguing it would create supersized "Joint

Fundraising Committees" (JFCs).

In court, they claimed these JFCs would allow a single donor to cut a multimillion-dollar

check, and the JFC would then route funds through dozens of participating state parties,

who would then funnel it back to the final recipient.

Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer claimed the Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. FEC ruling

would lead to "the system of legalized bribery recreated that existed prior to Watergate."

The Supreme Court, in ruling for us, flatly stated such a scheme would still be illegal."Then

comes the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) which involves $500 million that was funneled in

such a way that the Supreme Court had recently said was illegal.

Cutting a big check, sending money to various places, then funneling it all back to the

place it was initially determined to go after hopping the money over a million hurdles.

Trump's team has rightfully filed an FEC complaint to investigate the matters with

the $500 million.

The Committee to Defend the President has filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton's

campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic state parties and Democratic mega-donors.

As Fox News reported, we documented the Democratic establishment "us[ing] state chapters as

straw men to circumvent campaign donation limits and launder(ing) the money back to

her campaign."

The 101-page complaint focused on the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) — the $500 million joint

fundraising committee between the Clinton campaign, DNC, and dozens of state parties

— which did exactly that the Supreme Court declared would still be illegal.

It's reported that HVF was taking, or asking for, significant six-figure donations from

well-known entities such as clothing companies and celebrities like Seth MacFarlane.

If they were given a donation, then the money was taken through different parties, and it

seems like the cash eventually made it back to Clinton's hands.

The smaller number we're working within this is about $84 million, and that could

make it the most massive campaign scandal involving finance in American history.

Backer continues his report: "Here's what we know.

Campaign finance law is incredibly complex and infamous for its lack of clarity.

As I've explained before, its complexity is a feature, not a bug.

Major political players with the resources to hire the very few attorneys who practice

campaign finance law benefit from the complexity that keeps others out.

Perhaps HVF's architects thought so too, and assumed that if no one understands what's

happening, no one would complain.

Here's what you can do, legally.

Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state

party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account.

These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of

those contribution limits — it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit

for any one recipient.

And state parties can make unlimited transfers to their national party.

Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway.

As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v. FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept

contributions to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are

ultimately excessive — there are five separate prohibitions here.

On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party

accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting

by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.

Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton

campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy

together.

Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure

checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed."

HVF had some shady business going on with significant donations that were mixed up in

false FEC reports by multiple entities.

Was money being reported as being sent to one place, but indeed appearing in another?

Was the cash being reportedly tossed in various locations to make it harder to track?

HVF bundled these megagifts and, on a single day, reported transferring money to all participating

state parties, some of which would then show up on FEC reports filed by the DNC as transferring

the exact same dollar amount on the exact same day to the DNC.

Yet not all the state parties reported either receiving or transferring those sums.

Did any of these transfers actually happen?

Or were they just paper entries to mask direct transfers to the DNC?

This sounds like something that everyday Americans only see in well thought out movies, but those

movies always seem to end with the perpetrator finally getting caught by an intelligent investigator

who finally pieces that puzzle together and solves the crime unmasking someone no one

suspected.

Is Hillary Clinton guilty of crimes or is she just the name that will be thrown under

the bus by a much bigger force?

Is there more to this than just the money being pushed around in ways that the Supreme

Court might find illegal?

If anyone goes down for this, that won't be the end of it.

Under every major crime, there are tons of little mysterious odds and ends, but there

could also be a more prominent king of the hill.

Is Hillary the king of the mountain in this investigation or is there someone above her

calling the shots?

For more infomation >> BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 7:12.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Coast Guard Members golf at President's country club in West Palm Beach - Duration: 1:49.

For more infomation >> U.S. Coast Guard Members golf at President's country club in West Palm Beach - Duration: 1:49.

-------------------------------------------

SHOCKINGGG! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary INVOLVED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 10:08.

For more infomation >> SHOCKINGGG! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary INVOLVED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 10:08.

-------------------------------------------

The Star Spangled Banner (United States National Anthem) - Sung By: Mikku the Singer - Duration: 1:07.

Oh say can you see,

By the dawn's

early lights,

What so proudly we hailed,

at

the twilight's last

gleaming. Whose broad stripes and

bright stars, through the perilous

fight, o'er the

ramparts we watched,

were so gallantly streaming,

and the rocket's

red glare,

the bombs bursting

in air,

gave proof

through the night,

that our flag was still there.

Oh say does that star

spangled

banner yet wave,

o'er the land

of the free...

and the home of the

brave!

For more infomation >> The Star Spangled Banner (United States National Anthem) - Sung By: Mikku the Singer - Duration: 1:07.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Military $110 Million Dollar 'Project Gray Wolf' Has North Korea On Their Heels - Duration: 5:55.

The impending conflict with North Korea has put quite a bit of stress on

international relations as countries are forced to take sides

North Korea's neighbors have even had to cut off their trade relations with the

dictatorship in an effort to force the country to end its nuclear projects

sadly none of these efforts have convinced the North Korean government to

cease and desist their F campaign to start World War 3

even with the possibility of conflict the United States has stood firm with

President Trump now heading the armed forces unlike his predecessor the

president doesn't believe in negotiating with terrorists

which is exactly what Kim jong-un has been determined to be somehow the

petulant leader of the tiny country still believes that he would win in

all-out war and continues his threats as of just days ago though the tables

may have turned the conservative Tribune reports that the recent advancements

made by the United States military should have jong-un running for the

hills begging the United States not to go to

war with him in a 110 million dollar dollar contract

Lockheed Martin has announced that it will begin working on a program simply

known as project gray wolf this contract will create the first weapon of its kind

swarming missiles that is sure to strike terror into the hearts of the United

States enemies including North Korea's Kim jong-un according to the UK Daily

Mail the missiles will be a low-cost missile with built-in networked

collaborative behaviors or swarming behaviors the first demonstrations will

be conducted with an f16 aircraft but it will ultimately work with the f-35 f15

f-18 b1 b2 and b-52 aircraft in addition to the f-16

Lockheed Martin's concept for the gray wolf missile will be an affordable

counter iad missile that will operate efficiently in highly contested

environments said Haddie Murad advanced missiles program director for Lockheed

Martin missiles and fire control using the capabilities envisioned for later

spirals our system is being designed to maximize modularity allowing our

customer to incorporate advanced technologies such as more lethal

warheads or more fuel-efficient engines when those systems become available

in essence these missiles will be able to communicate to each other the

missiles will initially work with the f-16 fighter jet but will work with

other planes as well the f-35 f15 f-18 b1 b2 and b-52 aircraft will all

eventually get this new technology advanced missiles program director for

Lockheed Martin missiles and fire control Haddie Murad told the Daily Mail

Oh your system is being designed to maximize modularity allowing our

customer to incorporate advanced technologies such as more lethal

warheads or more fuel-efficient engines when those systems become available the

new advancements outlined here are just another reminder of how much more

advanced the United States is than North Korea not only are they working on

nuclear technology that we've had for decades they're trying to overtake a

technological mark us who isn't standing still none of the US military is sitting

around on our hands waiting for North Korea to strike our progress goes on

two missiles that swarm Lockheed Martin is also creating a high-powered fiber

laser for fighter jets according to Daily Mail the new laser

system would allow fighter jets to take down targets from the air in contrast to

previous systems which were mounted on vehicles or ships under a twenty six

point three million dollar contract from the Air Force Research Lab Lockheed

Martin plans to develop a directed-energy system for aircraft with

plans to test the technology by 2021 Lockheed Martin has had success with

similar ground-based systems now the company is moving toward developing that

same technology for airborne systems while all of this seems pretty amazing

the swarm missiles won't be ready until 2019 while the laser weapons for

aircraft are looking at a much later date regardless as phones TVs and even

cars become smarter rest assured you're going to see that happen with our

weapons systems all the more having missiles that can communicate with each

other is some pretty amazing technology as Trump continues his presidency look

for more technological advances as well as a stronger military if there's one

thing we know about President Donald Trump it's this he wants our military to

be the best trained and best-equipped military in the world and we'll do

whatever it takes to make it happen project gray wolf does just that

every self-respecting American knows that our military can outperform North

Korea no contest the question that comes to mind is why what makes us inherently

better while some might say that it's because we were bigger that's probably

not the case even though the North Korean dictator was trying to have the

best possible dictator experience by cracking down on his people just the

opposite happened North Korea's population is essentially

25 million hostages constantly in fear of their hostage taker even though this

might seem like a good way to motivate people an environment of fear is not one

that creativity and ingenuity thrives in in order to be the best you've got to

allow people to be free which is what makes America one of the most advanced

nations on earth Kim jong-un has basically cut off his nose to spite his

face and if he insists on war with the United States he's going to find that

out the hard way

For more infomation >> U.S. Military $110 Million Dollar 'Project Gray Wolf' Has North Korea On Their Heels - Duration: 5:55.

-------------------------------------------

Blue States Are In For A Mass Exodus - Duration: 2:17.

Blue States

Are In For A Mass Exodus

It turns out that people hate living in blue states, where lax drug laws, tight gun control,

socialist taxation, and liberal social circles make the place uninhabitable.

According to The Daily Caller, three major blue states lost a record number of citizens

in 2016-2017.

New York saw the worst exodus of people, with about 190,000 residents fleeing from July

1, 2016 to July 1, 2017, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released last week.

�New York�s domestic out-migration during that time period was about the same as it

was in the same time 2015 and 2016,� reports The Daily Caller.

�Since 2010, the state�s outflow of just over 1 million residents has exceeded that

of every other state, both in absolute terms and as a share of population, according to

the free-market think tank Empire Center.�

The same could not be said for President Obama�s home state of Illinois, which has now dropped

from the fifth to the sixth-most populous state in 2017.

The fifth-most populous state is Pennsylvania, which swung red for Trump in the previous

election.

The once golden state of California lost 138,000 residents.

Like New York, it has weathered the storm by having the largest influx of international

migrants.

� READ MORE

For more infomation >> Blue States Are In For A Mass Exodus - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 6:24.

BREAKING!!

HE JUST DID it… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY!

Dan Backer just pieced together an epic takedown of Hillary Clinton that's based on FEC reports,

memos by Clinton's campaign manager, and public statements from people like Donna Brazile

and many others who chose to speak out openly.

Could this information be the final stake in the heart of Hillary Clinton's alleged

crimes?

Let's analyze the information and see where it takes us.

The information dates back to 2014 when Shaun McCutcheon won favor from the Supreme Court.

As reported by Investors: "In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in favor

of my client, Alabama engineer Shaun McCutcheon, in his challenge to the Federal Election Commission's

(FEC) outdated "aggregate limits," which effectively limited how many candidates any

one donor could support.

Anti-speech liberals railed against McCutcheon's win, arguing it would create supersized "Joint

Fundraising Committees" (JFCs).

In court, they claimed these JFCs would allow a single donor to cut a multimillion-dollar

check, and the JFC would then route funds through dozens of participating state parties,

who would then funnel it back to the final recipient.

Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer claimed the Supreme Court's McCutcheon v Federal

Election Commission ruling would lead, to "the system of legalized bribery recreated

that existed prior to Watergate."

The Supreme Court, in ruling for us, flatly stated such a scheme would still be illegal."

Then comes the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) which involves $500 million that was funneled

in such a way that the Supreme Court had recently said was illegal.

Cutting a big check, sending money to various places, then funneling it all back to the

place it was initially determined to go after hopping the money over a million hurdles.

Trump's team has rightfully filed an FEC complaint to investigate the matters with

the $500 million.

The Committee to Defend the President has filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton's

campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic state parties and Democratic mega-donors.

As Fox News reported, we documented the Democratic establishment "using state chapters as straw

men to circumvent campaign donation limits, and laundering the money back to her campaign."

The 101-page complaint focused on the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) — the $500 million joint

fundraising committee between the Clinton campaign, DNC and dozens of state parties

— which did exactly that the Supreme Court declared would still be illegal.

It's reported that HVF was taking, or asking for, significant six-figure donations from

well-known entities such as clothing companies and celebrities like Seth MacFarlane.

If they were given a donation, then the money was taken through different parties, and it

seems like the cash eventually made it back to Clinton's hands.

The smaller number we're working within this is about $84 million, and that could

make it the most massive campaign scandal involving finance in American history.

Backer continues his report: "Here's what we know.

Campaign finance law is incredibly complex and infamous for its lack of clarity.

As I've explained before, its complexity is a feature, not a bug.

Major political players with the resources to hire the very few attorneys, who practice

campaign finance law benefit from the complexity that keeps others out.

Perhaps HVF's architects thought so too, and assumed that if no one understands what's

happening, no one would complain.

Here's what you can do, legally.

Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state

party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account.

These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of

those contribution limits — it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit

for any one recipient.

And state parties can make unlimited transfers to their national party.

Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway.

As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept contributions

to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are ultimately excessive

— there are five separate prohibitions here.

On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party

accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting

by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.

Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton

campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy

together.

Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure

checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed."

HVF had some shady business going on with significant donations that were mixed up in

false FEC reports by multiple entities.

Was money being reported as being sent to one place, but indeed appearing in another?

Was the cash being reportedly tossed in various locations to make it harder to track?

Did any of these transfers actually happen?

Or were they just paper entries to mask direct transfers to the DNC?

This sounds like something that everyday Americans only see in well thought out movies, but those

movies always seem to end with the perpetrator finally getting caught by an intelligent investigator,

who finally pieces that puzzle together and solves the crime unmasking someone no one

suspected.

Is Hillary Clinton guilty of crimes or is she just the name that will be thrown under

the bus by a much bigger force?

Is there more to this than just the money being pushed around in ways that the Supreme

Court might find illegal?

If anyone goes down for this, that won't be the end of it.

Under every major crime, there are tons of little mysterious odds and ends, but there

could also be a more prominent king of the hill.

Is Hillary the king of the mountain in this investigation or is there someone above her

calling the shots?

what do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 6:24.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 7:10.

BREAKING!!

HE JUST DID IT…

Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY!

Dan Backer just pieced together an epic takedown of Hillary Clinton that's based on FEC reports,

memos by Clinton's campaign manager, and public statements from people like Donna Brazile

and many others who chose to speak out openly.

Could this information be the final stake in the heart of Hillary Clinton's alleged

crimes?

Let's analyze the information and see where it takes us.

The information dates back to 2014 when Shaun McCutcheon won favor from the Supreme Court.

As reported by Investors: "In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in favor

of my client, Alabama engineer Shaun McCutcheon, in his challenge to the Federal Election Commission's

(FEC) outdated "aggregate limits," which effectively limited how many candidates any

one donor could support.

Anti-speech liberals railed against McCutcheon's win, arguing it would create supersized "Joint

Fundraising Committees" (JFCs).

In court, they claimed these JFCs would allow a single donor to cut a multimillion-dollar

check, and the JFC would then route funds through dozens of participating state parties,

who would then funnel it back to the final recipient.

Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer claimed the Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. FEC ruling

would lead to "the system of legalized bribery recreated that existed prior to Watergate."

The Supreme Court, in ruling for us, flatly stated such a scheme would still be illegal."Then

comes the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) which involves $500 million that was funneled in

such a way that the Supreme Court had recently said was illegal.

Cutting a big check, sending money to various places, then funneling it all back to the

place it was initially determined to go after hopping the money over a million hurdles.

Trump's team has rightfully filed an FEC complaint to investigate the matters with

the $500 million.

The Committee to Defend the President has filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton's

campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic state parties and Democratic mega-donors.

As Fox News reported, we documented the Democratic establishment "us[ing] state chapters as

straw men to circumvent campaign donation limits and launder(ing) the money back to

her campaign."

The 101-page complaint focused on the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) — the $500 million joint

fundraising committee between the Clinton campaign, DNC, and dozens of state parties

— which did exactly that the Supreme Court declared would still be illegal.

It's reported that HVF was taking, or asking for, significant six-figure donations from

well-known entities such as clothing companies and celebrities like Seth MacFarlane.

If they were given a donation, then the money was taken through different parties, and it

seems like the cash eventually made it back to Clinton's hands.

The smaller number we're working within this is about $84 million, and that could

make it the most massive campaign scandal involving finance in American history.

Backer continues his report: "Here's what we know.

Campaign finance law is incredibly complex and infamous for its lack of clarity.

As I've explained before, its complexity is a feature, not a bug.

Major political players with the resources to hire the very few attorneys who practice

campaign finance law benefit from the complexity that keeps others out.

Perhaps HVF's architects thought so too, and assumed that if no one understands what's

happening, no one would complain.

Here's what you can do, legally.

Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state

party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account.

These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of

those contribution limits — it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit

for any one recipient.

And state parties can make unlimited transfers to their national party.

Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway.

As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v. FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept

contributions to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are

ultimately excessive — there are five separate prohibitions here.

On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party

accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting

by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.

Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton

campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy

together.

Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure

checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed."

HVF had some shady business going on with significant donations that were mixed up in

false FEC reports by multiple entities.

Was money being reported as being sent to one place, but indeed appearing in another?

Was the cash being reportedly tossed in various locations to make it harder to track?

HVF bundled these megagifts and, on a single day, reported transferring money to all participating

state parties, some of which would then show up on FEC reports filed by the DNC as transferring

the exact same dollar amount on the exact same day to the DNC.

Yet not all the state parties reported either receiving or transferring those sums.

Did any of these transfers actually happen?

Or were they just paper entries to mask direct transfers to the DNC?

This sounds like something that everyday Americans only see in well thought out movies, but those

movies always seem to end with the perpetrator finally getting caught by an intelligent investigator

who finally pieces that puzzle together and solves the crime unmasking someone no one

suspected.

Is Hillary Clinton guilty of crimes or is she just the name that will be thrown under

the bus by a much bigger force?

Is there more to this than just the money being pushed around in ways that the Supreme

Court might find illegal?

If anyone goes down for this, that won't be the end of it.

Under every major crime, there are tons of little mysterious odds and ends, but there

could also be a more prominent king of the hill.

Is Hillary the king of the mountain in this investigation or is there someone above her

calling the shots?

For more infomation >> BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 7:10.

-------------------------------------------

What If The United States Invaded China? - Duration: 3:39.

US Chinese relations have always been somewhat complicated.

Both countries rely on one another economically, but both countries also aknowledge that the

other could be a potential adversary.

But what if that delicate relationship suddenly became strained?

Today, Life's biggest questions asks, what if The united states Invaded China?

Hello and welcome back to LBQ, I'm your host, charlotte dobre.

As always make sure you hit that thumbs up and subscribe and let us know in the comments

below what topics you would like to see next.

Over the last few years, China's military is becoming more technologically advanced,

and it doesn't have obligations to the rest of the world the way America does.

China has nuclear capabilities, satellite technology and military forces on the ground,

air and sea.

China is the world's runner up for military spending, after the united states.

According to Abraham Denmark, senior vice president for political and security affairs

at the natural bureau for Asian research, a war between the US and China would be disastrous

for both sides.

So in order To invade china, the US would have to have a very good reason.

Perhaps If china got into a conflict with one of the united states' allies, like japan

or south korea, and the united states would be forced to intervene to defend those countries.

But, If the United States invaded China, without a good enough reason, that would make them

the aggressor, and effectively a war criminal.

And being a war criminal does not put you in the best position when it comes to needing

allies.

The ability to win the war will depend on the political climate at the time, and which

countries would back up the US and which would back up China.

If the United States invaded china, it would need to use its current allies that surround

china to serve as bases and launch points.

And having those allies really close to china poses a problem.

If the US wanted to strike china with a nuclear missile from the mainland, that missile has

to fly through the airspace of the surrounding countries.

In addition the fallout from that missile would affect all of the surrounding countries.

China has the geographical advantage.

In the event that the united states invades china, China could use nuclear weapons to

strategically take out all of the bases that the US requires.

It could destroy bases, like the Port of Yokosuka, or the Kadena Air base, and effectively stop

the war in its tracks.

If this happens, It would be extremely difficult for the US military to continue an operation.

Its aircraft need bases to refuel.

America would have to transport its supplies all the way from mainland America, or from

Australia.

Not to mention, what if India, North Korea or Russia came to chinas defence?

Russia could attack the united states from Alaska, Canada would have to then take a side.

If they side with America, its in the middle of a conflict, if it sides with china, a land

route opens up for Russian forces.

Either way, Canada would have to get involved, and All of a sudden, an American invasion

of china becomes a full fledged world war.

A war that the united states may very well lose.

Yes, the united states has the best military the world has ever seen, but you don't always

need the best military to win a war.

Many historians will say that the first rule of military strategy is to never get involved

in a land war in asia.

An invasion of china would be a bloodbath, especially for chinese civillians and US troops.

Millions would die initially, then after the first waves of troups died off, the US would

have to send more troups into the blood bath.

It would go on until both countries were so badly wounded, militarily, politically and

economically that they would be forced to stop.

American influence in asia would surely be strained following a war with china, especially

if they had been the aggressor.

It might never have the same influence in the east again.

What do you think would happen if the US invaded China?

Let us know in the comments below.

If you liked that video, you should also check out, what if the united states invaded England,

or what if the united states invaded Canada, clickable on the screen right now.

For now, I'm charlotte dobre, and you've been watching lifes biggest questions.

Don't forget to click the bell so you never miss an upload.

For more infomation >> What If The United States Invaded China? - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

What should the US do if China continues to defy sanctions? - Duration: 4:26.

For more infomation >> What should the US do if China continues to defy sanctions? - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump says Russia probe puts US in bad light - Duration: 4:09.

For more infomation >> President Trump says Russia probe puts US in bad light - Duration: 4:09.

-------------------------------------------

Which state will be next to legalize marijuana in 2018? - Duration: 3:33.

For more infomation >> Which state will be next to legalize marijuana in 2018? - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Barring Late Legal Twist, U.S. Military To Accept Transgender Recruits - Duration: 3:26.

Transgender people will be allowed to enlist in the US Armed Forces starting

on Monday as ordered by federal courts unless President Donald Trump's

administration seeks last-minute Supreme Court intervention to try to enforce his

blocked transgender ban two federal appeals courts one in

Washington and one in Virginia last week rejected the administration's request to

put on hold orders by lower court judges requiring the military to begin

accepting transgender recruits on January 1st

Justice Department spokeswoman Lauren Ayer Sam said on Friday there was no

update on whether the administration would file an emergency application at

the Supreme Court

lawyers representing currently serving transgender service members and aspiring

recruits said they had expected the administration to appeal those rulings

to the conservative majority Supreme Court but were hoping that would not

happen it definitely seems like they aren't

going to the Supreme Court but until we say a Happy New Year on Sunday night I'm

not taking anything for granted said joshua bloch a lawyer with the

American Civil Liberties Union in a move that appealed to his hardline

conservative supporters Trump announced in July that he would prohibit

transgender people from serving in the military reversing Democratic former

President Barack Obama's policy of accepting them Trump said on Twitter at

the time that the military cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical

costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail

for federal judges in Baltimore Washington DC Seattle and Riverside

California have issued rulings blocking Trump's ban while legal challenges to

the Republican president's policy precede the judges said the ban would

likely violate the right under the US Constitution to equal protection under

the law if the administration does not seek

Supreme Court suspension of the lower court injunctions openly transgender

individuals would be able to join the Armed Forces for the first time subject

to certain medical standards set forth by the Pentagon

there has been a tremendous amount of care thought and planning that has gone

into the policy that is set to go into effect on January 1st allowing

transgender people to enlist said Jennifer Levi's a lawyer with gay

lesbian and transgender advocacy group glad both GLAAD in the ACLU represent

plaintiffs in the lawsuits filed against the administration the administration

has argued that the military was not prepared to train the personnel needed

to properly assess transgender applicants the Obama administration had

set a deadline of July 1st of this year to begin accepting transgender recruits

but Trump's defense secretary James mattis postponed that date to January

1st which the president's ban then put off indefinitely

Trump also has taken other steps aimed at rolling back transgender rights in

October his administration said that a federal law banning gender-based

workplace discrimination does not protect transgender employees reversing

an Obama era position in February trump rescinded guidance issued by the obama

administration saying that public schools should allow transgender

students to use the restroom that corresponds to their gender identity

For more infomation >> Barring Late Legal Twist, U.S. Military To Accept Transgender Recruits - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

Brutal Cold Temperatures Affect Parts of US, Canada - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> Brutal Cold Temperatures Affect Parts of US, Canada - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Political reporters size up U.S. Senate field - Duration: 6:15.

For more infomation >> Political reporters size up U.S. Senate field - Duration: 6:15.

-------------------------------------------

American Isis fighter says 'war on Islam' has made US more vulnerable to attack in video message t - Duration: 4:19.

American isis fighter says we're on islam has made us more vulnerable to attack in video message to donald trump

Isis has claimed donald trump s war against islam is making the u.s.

more vulnerable to terror attacks while calling for further atrocities in a propaganda video released on wednesday and

African-american isis fighter using the war name abu salem raqi delivered a message to the president

You entered into the white house on the back of your crusader rhetoric which the fake media has pressured you to tone down

He said your feelings and hatred towards islam has already been revealed you are now witnessing your fake victory

your

war against islam has only made your homeland more vulnerable and your society is cracking into chaos

the american isis fighter whose true identity was not immediately known

was shown attaching a prosthetic leg and walking on crutches amid the ruins of buildings that appear to have been hit by airstrikes

wearing battle fatigues and carrying a pistol he repeated calls for isis supporters to rise and strike the kuffar

disbelievers and claimed the isis flag would be raised over the white house

the propaganda message suggested that rising island phobia and terror attacks in the us could help drive

supporters to isis s cause with the fighter saying

take advantage of the fact you can easily

Obtain a rifle or a pistol in america and spray the kafar with bullets so that their fear of muslims

rises and they continue to reveal their hatred towards islam for the ummah community to rise

isis has continually sought to exploit political tensions across the west to fuel its narrative of the holy war between its supporters and anyone including

muslims who oppose its brutal interpretation of sharia law the group s message to mr

trump came as activists told the independent american muslims were more vulnerable to a llama phobia under mr

Trump as president even in the wake of the nine to eleven attacks it has not just americans muslims who feel anxious

said, abraham hooper a founder of the council on american-islamic relations

We have seen white supremacists emboldened under trump

experts have warned of the danger of reciprocal radicalization where islamists and far-right extremists feed off each other to boost their own popularity

The president has been heavily

criticized for what create labeled a muslim ban on travel from selected countries as well as his whiter

remarks on islam an alleged failure to confront white supremacism

isis s latest video released by its main propaganda channels

incorporated footage of the aftermath of terror attacks including those in las vegas in orlando which were both claimed by the group

isis also claimed responsibility for a vehicle attack that killed eight people in manhattan on halloween but remained silent over a failed suicide

bombing in new york s subway system earlier this month

investigators said the suspect a kadala had been radicalized by materials including isis propaganda from

2014 onwards and had watched a video instructing supporters unable to travel to the group as territories to carry out attacks at home

shortly before the blast on the 11th of december he posted a statement on facebook

reading trump you failed to protect your nation as well as a declaration that the attack was carried out in the name of isis as

the terrorist group s self declared state in syria and iraq has dwindled it has been increasing its calls for attacks around the world

issuing detailed guidance on how to obtain firearms make bombs or used knives and vehicles to inflict mass casualties

another propaganda video released by isis s affiliate in somalia on christmas day incited attacks on new year s eve

celebrations christmas markets bars and the pope it also featured an english-speaking

isis militant who called on the brothers who live among the kuffar to commit atrocities

Until the group s black banner rises from washington to moscow from europe to china

British security services have warned that the risk of isis inspired terror attacks continues to grow and evolve despite the group as huge

territorial losses with a battle of ideas far from one

military officials say the group s remaining fighters are regrouping in the desert border between syria and iraq parts of afghanistan

egypt and libya on

wednesday us central command said there had been a series of raids targeting cave networks used by isis militants

In syria s hamid desert

For more infomation >> American Isis fighter says 'war on Islam' has made US more vulnerable to attack in video message t - Duration: 4:19.

-------------------------------------------

The Entire History of the US in ONE minute!!! - Duration: 1:16.

The French and Indian War it was called the Seven Years War but it was actually nine

years the British won

now the British are broke so they tax the colonists and

the colonists didn't like that and then they went to war in the Revolutionary

War the colonists won which

George Washington was the first president and

he had a cabinet and Jefferson and Hamiliton were in it there was conflict listen to Humiliation the musical-

In 1803 Thomas Jefferson made the Louisiana Purchase

because a manifest destiny and America's desire and God given right to move westward

Andrew Jackson was president and he hated Native Americans and there was the trail of tears

and tension was rising about the issue of slavery so the Missouri Compromise-

secede from the Union cause they wanted to keep slavery so they went to

war Abraham Lincoln was the president and the north won

and then the black codes started and it was horrible

Great Depression but you know about that

attacked Pearl Harbor and then we went to World War two

If you're watching this video I'm sorry this was on merely to distract you right now I have agents

going back in time to change every important person into a beanie baby. George

Washington beanie baby Dwight D Eisenhower a beanie baby

Fleetwood Mac beanie babies

why am I doing this?

I have a lot of stock in beanie babies

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét