Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 12, 2017

Auto news on Youtube Dec 2 2017

The Korean government held a second public hearing in Seoul Friday ahead of new negotiations

with the United States about the two countries' free trade agreement.

At the Coex Convention Center in Seoul this morning, experts explained the effects they've

seen from the FTA.

And ordinary citizens made their voices heard too.

Our Kim Hyesung was at the venue, and filed us this report.

Korea's trade ministry held a second public hearing... on the possible amendments to the

South Korea-U.S. free trade agreement on Friday.

(Korean) "After the first public hearing last month,

we held constructive meetings with representatives from the manufacturing and agricultural sector

to better reflect their opinion on the Korea-U.S. FTA."

It comes after the first hearing was disrupted by angry farmers on November 10th,... who

also protested for twenty minutes before Friday's hearing.

(sov) "Terminate the Korea-U.S. FTA.

End the renegotiations."

FTA ,

Before the 15-member panel meeting got underway in earnest, trade experts unveiled their economic

feasibility studies.

With regards to the agricultural sector, it said agricultural imports from the U.S. increased

by an yearly average of 15 percent, or 940 million U.S. dollars,... between 2012 and

2016... compared to the 2007-to-2011 period, just before the FTA went into effect in 2012.

The report also said U.S. beef imports have surged 124 percent since the FTA took effect,...

accounting for near half of Korea's beef market as of September 2017.

Experts said Korea's agriculture sector should be exempt from the renegotiations.

As for the manufacturing sector, Korea's exports to the U.S., saw a surplus,... mostly from

the automobile sector,... while steel and petrochemical exports dropped.

(Korean) "Korea's manufacturing trade surplus is not

because of lower tariffs from the FTA, but mainly due to the U.S.'s lack of competitiveness

in its machinery and automobile exports to Korea, as evidenced by the lower technological

specialization index in those goods."

The trade ministry also added that it will not just be on the defense when it comes to

the renegotiations.

Rather, it's eager to use the opportunity to raise the issue of anti-dumping tariffs

from the Trump Administration, expand work visas for skilled laborers,... and renegotiate

terms of the services industry,... according to WTO regulations.

(standup) Public hearing has come to an end.

Now, the trade ministry will finalize its process of gathering public opinion, draft

its Korea-U.S. FTA renegotiation strategy and report it to the National Assembly this

month, all part of the legal procedures to start a possible renegotiation with the U.S.

Kim Hyesung, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Gov't holds second public hearing on Korea-US FTA renegotiation - Duration: 2:49.

-------------------------------------------

US holds first Vietnam War draft - 12/1/1969 - Duration: 1:19.

Today, Military History 1969,

a draft lottery was held to determine the order

of call to military service in the Vietnam War.

It was the first lottery used

to order men into military service since 1942.

It applied to registrants born between

January 1, 1944 and December 31st, 1950,

and the event was broadcast on radio, film, and television.

366 blue capsules containing birth dates were mixed in a

shoe box, then placed in a large glass container, and drawn

by hand to randomly assign order of call numbers to all men

born between the 18 to 26 age range specified by law.

New York Representative,

Alexander Pirnie drew the first capsule.

It contained the date September 14th.

So all men born on September 14th in any year

between 1944 and 1950 were assigned lottery number one.

The drawing continued for every day in the year.

The date of the last drawing

for the lottery was on March 12th, 1975.

In total 1,728,344 men were drafted during the Vietnam War

and 648,500 of them were sent to Vietnam.

They accounted for just over 30% of

combat deaths with 17,725 lives lost.

Today, the US Military is an all-volunteer force,

but registration for conscription

remains the law just as a contingency plan.

For more infomation >> US holds first Vietnam War draft - 12/1/1969 - Duration: 1:19.

-------------------------------------------

China's hypersonic ultimate DOOMSDAY weapon – and it could wipe out the US in ONE SHOT - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:30.

China's hypersonic 'ultimate DOOMSDAY weapon' – and it could wipe out the US in ONE SHOT

CHINA new hypersonic nuclear missile has been

branded the "ultimate doomsday weapon" amid warnings it could wipe out the US in

one shot.

Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) is the next generation of nuke being developed for the People's

Liberation Army – and it has been in development for 30 years.

Chinese scientists boast the weapon is capable of hypersonic speeds up to Mach 25.

And last week state media claimed China's new nuke can hit "anywhere" in the world.

Now experts have offered their chilling assessment of the 19,030mph weapon – branding it a

"doomsday" device.

DF-41 would give the Chinese military the power to destroy the US with just a single

missile, it has been warned.

Nuclear disarmament campaigner John Hallam described the missile as the "ultimate doomsday

weapon".

He called it a "whopper" that was comparable, if not bigger than, Russia's new nuke the

colossal nation-killer Satan 2.

China's military are alleged to have tested the nuclear weapon at least eight times since

2012.

The weapon is believed to carry 10 nuclear warheads – each of which can seek of targets

independently.

DF-41 is believed to be 33 tonnes and approximately 15 metres long – and can be mounted on a

truck, or launched from a silo.

"Just one of these missiles, with 10 warheads each of 100kt plus range, could essentially

destroy either the major cities or the significant military capacity of the US," Mr Hallam

told news.com.au.

He added: "It's a whopper, comparable to the biggest Russian missiles, which it

resembles, including the recently tested Sarmat (Satan 2)."

China's military is allegedly pushing to drop Beijing's longstanding "no fire use"

doctrine for nuclear weapons.

Propaganda produced by China claims the Dongfeng-41 will be one of the most powerful nuclear missiles

in the world.

And there are reports China may have tested the Dongfeng-41 just two days before US President

Donald Trump arrived for a one-on-one meeting with President Xi Jinping.

Xi has said he wants China to have the capacity to win any war as he pushes for further modernisation

of the People's Liberation Army.

Estimates place the Dongfeng-41's operational range between 7,500 and and 9,000 miles – putting

the US comfortably in range.

Relations have long been frosty between the US and China as the Communist giant continues

to expand its influence in Asia and the two clash over North Korea.

China unveiled new hypersonic warheads last month as the superpower showed off its new

state-of-the-art wind tunnel.

For more infomation >> China's hypersonic ultimate DOOMSDAY weapon – and it could wipe out the US in ONE SHOT - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:30.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea threat: US will 'NOT get early WARNING' of Kim Jong-un attack amid WW3 fears - Duration: 3:46.

North Korea threat: US will 'NOT get early WARNING' of Kim Jong-un attack amid WW3 fears

has similar missiles to China, which means the US will not have a lot of warning before a potential missile strike, says the former four-star general.

  Speaking to , he said: "The fact that they have mobile missiles like the Russians and also like the Chinese, actually their launches look remarkably similar to the Chinese, means that we're not going to have a lot of early warning.

" "So that is a challenge for us and we're still heading towards the main effort here.

" He also said that the US is still depending on China and that it was a good sign they had not gone all in yet.

General Keane sad: "Nikki Haley said it yesterday, is China, the fact that she is publicly asking China to do more means that we know, for a fact, that China has not gone all in yet and we're still depending on them.  He added that US politicians have done a good job of uniting countries around in the world in severing diplomatic and economic ties with North Korea.

He said: "Secretary Tillerson and Haley have done a good job in getting countries to back away from economically supporting North Korea and it would put more pressure on North Korea for sure." North Korea released video footage of Kim Jong-un's latest missile launch on Wednesday after the despot dictator tested world leaders' patience once again.

The secretive state had previously sparked fears that could erupt after a series of ICBM tests. had seemingly paused his ambition to create an arsenal of deadly weapons, having not fired a rocket since mid-September.

However, on Wednesday morning Pyongyang time, the rogue state's leader sent a statement to the world by launching a missile higher than ever before.

Some experts have warned with a different trajectory the ICBM could have reached the United States – something Kim Jong-un has promised after spending months entangled in a furious war of words with.

North Korea has since released video footage of Kim Jong-un watching ones his Hwasong-15 rocket was sent into the night skies above Pyongyang.

The missile travelled for around 53 minutes eastward before crashing into the sea off of the coast of US ally Japan.

North Korea's state-run Korean Central News Agency said the weapon was "tipped with a super-large heavy warhead which is capable of striking the whole mainland of the US".

Nuclear experts have claimed while North Korea has yet to deliver a nuclear warhead on top of an ICBM, it is likely they will be able to achieve it soon. .

For more infomation >> North Korea threat: US will 'NOT get early WARNING' of Kim Jong-un attack amid WW3 fears - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

Rockwell B-1 Lancer - US Supersonic Heavy Strategic Bomber [Review] - Duration: 7:31.

The Rockwell B-1 Lancer is a supersonic variable-sweep wing, heavy bomber used by the United States

Air Force. It is commonly called the "Bone". It is one of three strategic bombers in the

USAF fleet as of 2017, the other two being the B-2 Spirit "Stealth Bomber", and the B-52

Stratofortress.

In the early 1990s, following the Gulf War and concurrent with the disestablishment of

SAC and its reassignment to the newly formed Air Combat Command, the B-1B was converted

to conventional bombing use. It first served in combat during Operation Desert Fox in 1998

and again during the NATO action in Kosovo the following year. The B-1B has supported

U.S. and NATO military forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. The USAF had 66 B-1Bs in service

as of September 2012. The B-1B is expected to continue to serve into the 2030s, with

the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider to begin replacing the B-1B after 2025. The B-1s currently

in inventory will reach the end of their service lives by 2045.

Unlike the B-1A, the B-1B cannot reach Mach 2+ speeds; its maximum speed is Mach 1.25

or 1,530 km/h, but its low-level speed increased to Mach 0.92 or 1,130 km/h. The speed of the

current version of the aircraft is limited by the need to avoid damage to its structure

and air intakes. To help lower its radar cross section, the B-1B uses serpentine air intake

ducts and fixed intake ramps, which limit its speed compared to the B-1A. Vanes in the

intake ducts serve to deflect and shield radar emissions from the highly reflective engine

compressor blades.

The B-1's main computer is the IBM AP-101, which is also used on the Space Shuttle orbiter

and the B-52 bomber. The computer is programmed with the JOVIAL programming language.

The B-1's defensive electronics include the Eaton AN/ALQ-161A radar warning and defensive

jamming equipment, which has three sets of antennas; one at the front base of each wing

and the third rear-facing in the tail radome. Also in the tail radome is the AN/ALQ-153

missile approach warning system.

Beginning in 2014, the B-1 was used by the U.S. against the Islamic State in the Syrian

Civil War. From August 2014 to January 2015, the B-1 accounted for eight percent of USAF

sorties during Operation Inherent Resolve. The 9th Bomb Squadron was deployed to Qatar

in July 2014 to support missions in Afghanistan, but when the air campaign against IS began

on 8 August, the aircraft were employed in Iraq. During the Battle of Kobane in Syria,

the squadron's B-1s dropped 660 bombs over 5 months in support of Kurdish forces defending

the city, one-third of all bombs used during OIR during the period, killing some 1,000

ISIL fighters. The 9th Bomb Squadron's B-1s went "Winchester", dropping all weapons on

board, 31 times during their deployment. They dropped over 2,000 JDAMs during the 6-month

rotation. B-1s from the 28th Bomb Wing flew 490 sorties where they dropped 3,800 munitions

on 3,700 targets during a six-month deployment. In February 2016, the B-1s were sent back

to the U.S. for cockpit upgrades.

As part of a USAF organizational realignment announced in April 2015, all B-1B aircraft

are to be reassigned from Air Combat Command to Global Strike Command effective 1 October

2015.

On 8 July 2017, the USAF flew two B-1 Lancers near the North Korean border in a show of

force amid increasing tensions, particularly in response to North Korea's 4 July test of

an ICBM capable of reaching Alaska.

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS: Crew:

4 (aircraft commander, copilot, offensive systems officer, and defensive systems officer)

Height: 10.4 m Wing area: 181.2 m²

Empty weight: 87,100 kg Loaded weight: 148,000 kg

Max. takeoff weight: 216,400 kg

Fuel capacity, optional: 37,900 L fuel tank each in 1–3 internal

weapons bays

Powerplant:4 × General Electric F101-GE-102 augmented turbofans

Dry thrust: 77.4 kilonewton each Thrust with afterburner: 136.92 kilonewton

each

PERFORMANCE: Maximum speed:

At altitude: Mach 1.25 or 1,340 km/h at 12,000 m altitude

At low level: Mach 0.92 or 1,100 km/h at 60–150 m altitude

Range: 9,400 km Combat radius: 5,543 km

Service ceiling: 18,000 m Rate of climb: 1,731 m/min

Wing loading: 816 kg/m² Thrust/weight: 0.38

ARMAMENT:

Hardpoints: 6 external hardpoints for 23,000 kg of ordnance

and 3 internal bomb bays for 34,000 kg of ordnance.

Bombs: 84× Mk-82 Air inflatable retarder general

purpose bombs 81× Mk-82 low drag general purpose bombs

84× Mk-62 Quickstrike sea mines 24× Mk-84 general purpose bombs and others..

Previously up to 24× B61 or B83 nuclear bombs could be carried.

Number built: B-1A: 4

B-1B: 100

Unit cost: US $283.1 million

in 1998 (B-1B)

For more infomation >> Rockwell B-1 Lancer - US Supersonic Heavy Strategic Bomber [Review] - Duration: 7:31.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. strategic assets arrive in S. Korea for first joint drill since N. Korea missile launch - Duration: 2:07.

South Korea and the United States will hold a joint Air Force drill next week involving

almost 230 aircraft.

The regular exercise is called Vigilant Ace, and it was planned before the North's latest

missile launch.

But coming so soon after, it'll likely involve a bigger show of force than ever before.

Oh Jung-hee reports.

U.S. strategic assets are arriving in South Korea for an annual joint air force drill

called Vigilant Ace next week.

The airborne exercise is set to mobilize 12-thousand U.S. personnel and almost 230 aircraft.

Six F-22 Raptor stealth fighter jets are to be deployed starting Saturday,... and all

six jets will fly over South Korea simultaneously for the first time in the history of the joint

drill.

F-22 jets are equipped with full stealth capabilities,... meaning that they can infiltrate North Korean

airspace undetected and destroy key nuclear and missile facilities.

Twelve F-35B jets will also be deployed.

The presence of the F-22 Raptor and the F-35B fighters is expected to put maximum pressure

on North Korea... as both aircraft can reach Pyongyang in only ten minutes if they depart

from Osan Air Base, located 64 km south of Seoul,... and in 20 minutes from Gunsan Air

Base in Jeollabuk-do Province.

In addition to these two, six F-35A stealth fighter jets also arrived in South Korea last

week... and B-1B bombers are expected to take part in the drill as well.

South Korea's defense ministry says... the joint exercise will focus on striking facilities

and moving targets in North Korea... as well as countering possible North Korean invasions

by sea and air.

This year's Vigilant Ace comes in less than a week after Pyongyang launched an ICBM,...

so it's expected to be carried out amid high tensions on the peninsula.

Seoul also plans to coordinate with Washington to have U.S. strategic assets deployed on

a rotational basis... until the end of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics.

Oh Jung-hee, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. strategic assets arrive in S. Korea for first joint drill since N. Korea missile launch - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. strategic assets arrive in S. Korea for first joint drill since N. Korea missile launch - Duration: 2:12.

South Korea and the United States will hold a joint Air Force drill next week involving

almost 230 aircraft.

The regular exercise is called Vigilant Ace, planned before North Korea's latest missile

launch.

But coming so soon after, it may involve a bigger show of force than ever before.

Our Oh Jung-hee has the details.

U.S. strategic assets are arriving in South Korea for an annual joint air force drill

called Vigilant Ace next week.

The airborne exercise is set to mobilize 12-thousand U.S. personnel and almost 230 aircraft.

Six F-22 Raptor stealth fighter jets are to be deployed starting Saturday,... and all

six jets will fly over South Korea simultaneously for the first time in the history of the joint

drill.

F-22 jets are equipped with full stealth capabilities,... meaning that they can infiltrate North Korean

airspace undetected and destroy key nuclear and missile facilities.

Twelve F-35B jets will also be deployed.

The presence of the F-22 Raptor and the F-35B fighters is expected to put maximum pressure

on North Korea... as both aircraft can reach Pyongyang in only ten minutes if they depart

from Osan Air Base, located 64 km south of Seoul,... and in 20 minutes from Gunsan Air

Base in Jeollabuk-do Province.

In addition to these two, six F-35A stealth fighter jets also arrived in South Korea last

week... and B-1B bombers are expected to take part in the drill as well.

South Korea's defense ministry says... the joint exercise will focus on striking facilities

and moving targets in North Korea... as well as countering possible North Korean invasions

by sea and air.

This year's Vigilant Ace comes in less than a week after Pyongyang launched an ICBM,...

so it's expected to be carried out amid high tensions on the peninsula.

Seoul also plans to coordinate with Washington to have U.S. strategic assets deployed on

a rotational basis... until the end of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics.

Oh Jung-hee, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. strategic assets arrive in S. Korea for first joint drill since N. Korea missile launch - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

N. Korea seeking U.S. recognition as nuclear weapons state: Russian officials - Duration: 0:39.

Our top story this afternoon...

North Korea is pushing the United States to recognize it as a nuclear weapons state.

Russian delegates who recently visited Pyongyang say North Korea is ready to hold direct talks

with Washington, but only on the condition that it recognize the regime as a nuclear

power.

The Russians said they were also told that the North successfully launched its new Hwasong-15

ICBM on Wednesday,... and that the country had already achieved its goal of becoming

a nuclear weapons state.

The bilateral meeting took place on Thursday,.. a day after the launch.

For more infomation >> N. Korea seeking U.S. recognition as nuclear weapons state: Russian officials - Duration: 0:39.

-------------------------------------------

US OKs Sale of Guided-Missile Bombs to Singapore - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> US OKs Sale of Guided-Missile Bombs to Singapore - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Episode 1122 | Former U.S. Senator Fred Harris - Duration: 25:19.

FORMER US SENATOR FRED HARRIS, A LONG TIME RESIDENT OF

CORRALES, WAS OKLAHOMA'S US SENATOR FROM '64 TO '73.

APPOINTED BY PRESIDENT LYNDON JOHNSON TO THE NATIONAL

ADVISORY COMMISSION ON CIVIL DISORDERS, ALSO KNOWN AS THE

KERNER COMMISSION.

THE COMMISSION'S REPORT WHICH CAME OUT IN 1968, EXAMINED

CONDITIONS OF POVERTY AND RACE IN THE COUNTRY.

SENATOR HARRIS WILL SOON RELEASE A BOOK ON THE 50TH

ANNIVERSARY OF THE KERNER COMMISSION REPORT.

CORRESPONDENT RUSSELL CONTRERAS SAT DOWN WITH

SENATOR HARRIS TO TALK ABOUT HIS HISTORY IN POLITICS.

>> SENATOR FRED HARRIS, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US HERE.

TAKE ME BACK TO 1967.

WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE COUNTRY IN OUR URBAN AREAS AND

HOW DID YOU RESPOND AS SENATOR.

>> WE HAD A RIOT IN THE BLACK SECTION OF LOS ANGELES, THE

YEAR BEFORE.

AND SOME PEOPLE SAID -- NO, IT WAS '65 AND SOME PEOPLE HAD

SAID IT WAS A KIND OF A ONE OFF INCIDENT AND OTHERS SAID,

THIS IS A HARBINGER OF THINGS TO COME.

WELL, IT WAS THE LATTER.

IN SUMMER OF 1967 IN DETROIT AND NEWARK AND THEN ABOUT 20

SOMETHING OTHER CITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY, WE HAD JUST

EXPLOSIONS IN THE BLACK SECTIONS OF AMERICA'S CITIES.

I WAS A MEMBER OF THE SENATE, WITH ROBERT KENNEDY, THE

RIBICOFF COMMITTEE LOOKING INTO URBAN PROBLEMS AND

PROBLEMS OF RACISM AS WELL AS POVERTY.

AND, SO, I WENT THROUGH THE SENATE FLOOR AND INTRODUCED A

RESOLUTION TO CREATE A BLUE RIBBON CITIZENS COMMISSION TO

LOOK INTO THESE RIOTS, NOT JUST ONLY FROM THE LAW AND

ORDER STANDPOINT, BUT ALSO TRYING TO GET AT THE DEEPER

CAUSES OF WRETCHED POVERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITIES AND RACISM.

AND THE RESOLUTION CAME UP IN THE SUBCOMMITTEE I CHAIRED,

BUT THEN IT OCCURRED TO ME THAT LYNDON JOHNSON HIMSELF,

THE PRESIDENT, COULD DO THIS BY EXECUTIVE ORDER.

SO I GOT WORD TO HIM AND URGED HIM TO DO THAT AND THAT IS

WHAT EVENTUALLY HE DID, PRETTY MUCH USING SOME OF THE SAME

WORDS I HAD.

>> WHEN THE PRESIDENT ANNOUNCED THIS COMMISSION, HE

DID CALL YOU AND SAY HE WANTED YOU ON IT.

WHAT DID YOU DO?

>> KIND OF FUNNY.

I HAD -- THERE HAD BEEN AN ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THE

PRESIDENT WAS GOING TO HAVE A NATIONWIDE BROADCAST TO

APPOINT THIS BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION AND SO I HAD

BROUGHT A TELEVISION INTO OUR LIVING ROOM AND INVITED SOME

NEIGHBORS, FRIENDS OF MINE, TO COME OVER AND WATCH THE

PRESIDENT'S SPEECH.

AND ABOUT 10 MINUTES BEFORE HE WAS TO GO ON THE AIR, MY

YOUNGEST DAUGHTER, LAUREL, SHE WAS IN, I THINK, IN THE THIRD

GRADE.

SHE CAME RUNNING OUT OF THE KITCHEN WHERE WE HAD A WALL

TELEPHONE AND SAID, DADDY, PRESIDENT JOHNSON IS ON THE

PHONE FOR YOU. AND SO I SAID, IS IT THE

PRESIDENT OR IS IT HIS SECRETARY?

NO, IT IS THE PRESIDENT.

HE SAID, THIS IS PRESIDENT JOHNSON, LET ME TALK YOUR

DADDY.

SO, I WENT IN AND TO THE WALL TELEPHONE AND I SAID, YES,

SIR, MR.

PRESIDENT.

AND HE SAID, FRED, I HOPE YOU'RE GOING TO WATCH

TELEVISION.

THESE WERE HIS WORDS.

I HOPE YOU'RE GOING TO WATCH TELEVISION TONIGHT.

I SAID, I AM.

HE SAID, I AM GOING TO APPOINT THAT COMMISSION YOU HAVE BEEN

TALKING ABOUT.

I SAID, WELL, I THINK THAT IS THE THING TO DO.

HE SAID, I AM GOING TO PUT YOU ON IT.

I SAID, WELL, I NEVER EXPECTED THAT, BUT I'LL DO THE BEST I

CAN.

HE SAID, NOW DON'T BE LIKE SOME OF YOUR COLLEAGUES, HE

SAID.

I APPOINT THEM TO THINGS AND THEY NEVER SHOW UP.

I SAID, WELL, I'LL SHOW UP.

I'LL WORK AT IT.

HE SAID, ANOTHER THING, FRED, I SAID YES, SIR,

MR.

PRESIDENT, HE SAID, I WANT YOU TO

REMEMBER YOU'RE A JOHNSON MAN, AND I SAID, I AM A JOHNSON

MAN.

HE SAID, IF YOU FORGET IT, I'LL TAKE MY POCKETKNIFE AND

CUT YOUR BLANKS OFF.

HE DID NOT SAY BLANKS.

HE SAID, YOU UNDERSTAND THAT KIND TALK OF TALK, DON'T YOU?

I SAID, YES I DO.

SO I WENT BACK TO THE LIVING ROOM AND THEY SAID, WHAT DID

HE SAY?

HE SAID, WELL, SOME OF IT WAS KIND OF PERSONAL.

IT TURNED OUT, OF COURSE, JOHNSON DID NOT LIKE OUR

EVENTUAL REPORT THAT KERNER COMMISSION AS IT CAME TO BE

CALLED, AND I THINK I HAD FORGOTTEN THAT I WAS A JOHNSON

MAN.

THAT WAS REALLY SAD BECAUSE PRESIDENT JOHNSON DID MORE TO

COMBAT RACISM AND POVERTY THAN ANY PRESIDENT BEFORE OR SINCE,

BUT HE WAS MISLED ABOUT WHAT WE RECOMMENDED AND REJECTED

OUR REPORT.

>> THIS WAS A BIPARTISAN BODY.

WHAT DID YOU GUYS HOPE TO FIND?

>> WELL, WHAT WE WANTED TO DO WAS TO MAKE -- FIRST TO FIND

THE FACTS, WHAT ARE THE FACTS IN THESE CENTRAL CITIES, FOR

EXAMPLE, POLICE COMMUNITY RELATIONS, WHICH TURNED OUT TO

BE HORRIBLE, WITH ENORMOUS HOSTILITY.

WHY HAD THESE RIOTS OCCURRED IN ONE PLACE AND NOT ANOTHER?

WE NEVER WERE ABLE TO ANSWER THAT, BUT WE COULD DESCRIBE

WITH PARTICULARITY THE CONDITIONS IN THE CITIES WHERE

RIOTS HAD OCCURRED AND WE WANTED TO COME UP WITH

SOLUTIONS, WHAT WE MUST DO, TO GET AT THESE PROBLEMS OF

POVERTY AND RACISM WHICH WERE AT THE BASE OF THESE RIOTS.

>> WHEN YOU VISITED IN THE RIOT CITIES, CITIES THAT HAD

SUFFERED RIOTS AND TALKED TO BLACK RESIDENTS, WHAT DID SOME

OF THE BLACK RESIDENTS TELL YOU THE PROBLEM WAS?

>> WELL, ALL OF THEM WERE COMPLAINING, EVERYBODY WE

TALKED TO, COMPLAINED ABOUT THE POLICE.

THERE WAS ENORMOUS HOSTILITY TO THE POLICE.

AND, FOR EXAMPLE, PRESIDENT JOHNSON, AS HE TALKED TO ME

ABOUT IT SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE COMMISSION, THESE TWO

TIMES DURING THE COMMISSION MEETINGS, HE SAID HE THOUGHT

THAT THERE WAS SOME CONSPIRACY BEHIND THE RIOTS.

THAT PEOPLE LIKE H BROWN AND STOKLEY CARMICHAEL, MILITANTS

OF THE DAY, BLACK MILITANTS, HE THOUGHT THEY SOMEHOW

PLANNED THESE RIOTS AND CALLED FOR THEM BY THEIR AGITATION,

AND I TRIED TO TELL HIM, NO, THAT WASN'T TRUE, THAT THERE

WERE THOUSANDS OF H BROWNS AND STOKLEY CARMICHAELS THAT

NEITHER HE FOR I HAD EVER HEARD OF, BUT THERE WAS SUCH

HOSTILITY AND THE CONDITIONS WERE SO TERRIBLE IN THESE

CENTRAL CITIES, THAT ALMOST ANY RANDOM SPARK COULD SET OFF

A RIOT AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAD OCCURRED.

>> WHEN YOU VISITED THE CITIES, YOU HAD ALREADY SPOKEN

OUT ABOUT POVERTY AND INEQUALITY BEFORE THIS.

WHEN YOU VISITED CITIES, WHAT CHANGED IN YOU WHEN YOU SAW

THE POVERTY?

>> WELL, IT DID NOT SURPRISE ME.

I EXPECTED THAT BUT IT REALLY SORT OF PUT FACES ON THE

RACISM AND POVERTY, TO SEE THE ACTUAL RESULTS.

ALSO, IT DID THIS, TOO.

FOR EXAMPLE, WE DIVIDED UP.

THE PEOPLE ON THE COMMISSION DIVIDED UP IN TEAMS AND WENT

AROUND TO THE CITIES WHERE RIOTS HAD OCCURRED.

>> MAYOR LINDSEY AND I TURNED OUT TO BE A TEAM.

>> MAYOR FROM NEW YORK?

>> YEAH, LINDSEY OF NEW YORK HE AND I WERE ACTUALLY

ACTIVIST LEADERS ON THE COMMISSION AND WE WENT AROUND

TO MILWAUKEE, FOR EXAMPLE AND CINCINNATI.

I SPENT THE MORNING IN MILWAUKEE IN A BLACK BARBER

SHOP AND I TALKED TO PEOPLE AS THEY CAME IN, MEN, AND WHAT I

FOUND WAS, THESE PEOPLE HAD COME TO MILWAUKEE FAIRLY LATE,

THIS WAS TRUE ALL OVER THE COUNTRY, TRYING TO BREAK A

SURGE -- BLACK PEOPLE MOVING FROM THE SOUTH INTO THE CITIES

IN THE NORTH, LOOKING FOR WORK.

AND THEY CAME TO PLACES LIKE MILWAUKEE JUST ABOUT THE TIME

THE JOBS WERE DISAPPEARING OR MOVING OUT TO THE SUBURBS OR

MOVING OVERSEAS AND SO WE TALKED ABOUT THAT WITH PEOPLE,

BUT ALSO I WOULD ASK, DO YOU FIND AS MUCH DISCRIMINATION

AGAINST AFRICAN AMERICANS IN MILWAUKEE OR BACK HOME IN

BIRMINGHAM OR WHATEVER, JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI.

AT FIRST PEOPLE WERE PUZZLED.

I FOUND OUT WHY, BECAUSE, IN MILWAUKEE, MOST OF THEM SAID

THEY NEVER SAW ANY WHITE PEOPLE.

IT WAS MORE SEGREGATED THAN THE PLACES WHERE THEY HAD COME

FROM IN THE SOUTH.

THERE WAS THAT MUCH SEGREGATION EXISTED.

TODAY, THAT IS A PROBLEM THAT IS RISING AGAIN.

OUR CITIES, OUR SCHOOLS, ARE RESEGREGATING AND THAT IS NOT

GOOD.

>> SO, AFTER WEEKS OF RESEARCH AND AFTER YOU GUYS DEBATING

AND VOTING ON THE COMMISSION, WHAT DID THE COMMISSION

FINALLY CONCLUDE?

>> WELL, THE MOST FAMOUS FINDING WAS, OUR NATION IS

MOVING TOWARD TWO SOCIETIES, ONE BLACK, ONE WHITE, SEPARATE

AND UNEQUAL.

TODAY WE WOULD ADD HISPANIC TO THAT.

BUT, ALSO, WE WENT ON TO SAY THAT THESE BLACK GHETTOS WERE

CREATED BY WHITE RACISM AND SUSTAINED BY WHITE RACISM.

AND, THAT CAME ACROSS AS A KIND OF A SHOCK TO PEOPLE,

BUT, IT WAS THE TRUTH.

WE ALSO TRIED OUR BEST TO HELP PEOPLE SEE THROUGH OUR EYES

THE KIND OF WRETCHED POVERTY, TERRIBLE HOUSING, TWO AND

THREE FAMILIES LIVING IN WHAT HAD ONCE BEEN A SINGLE FAMILY

HOME, JOBS GONE, NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION.

INFERIOR SCHOOLS AND SO MANY OF THEM HAD COME ALREADY COME

FROM CRIMINALLY INFERIOR SCHOOLS BACK IN THE SOUTH AND

IT WAS REALLY URGENT THAT WE GET AT THESE PROBLEMS AND WE

WERE QUITE HONEST IN SAYING THAT IT WAS GOING TO TAKE A

GREAT INCREASE IN FEDERAL FUNDS TO COMBAT THEM.

WE ALSO, FOR EXAMPLE, GOT WITH THE POLICE.

WE SAID, THAT THE POLICE OUGHT TO LOOK LIKE THE PEOPLE THAT

THEY ARE POLICING.

IN OTHER WORDS, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT WHAT CAN BE

CALLED COMMUNITY POLICING.

PEOPLE WERE RIGHT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

INSTEAD, WHAT IT WAS IN THOSE DAYS, THE POLICE WERE ALL

WHITE AND COMING IN TO ENFORCE THE LAW AGAINST THE PEOPLE

THERE, SO THAT PEOPLE DIDN'T SEE THE LAW AND LAW

ENFORCEMENT AS THEIR OWN. AND WE THOUGHT THE ATTITUDES

OUGHT TO CHANGE, USE OF FORCE.

WE WERE AGAINST THE MILITARIZATION OF THE POLICE

AND WE MADE HEADWAY ON ALL THESE THINGS, RELATIONS,

POVERTY AND POLICE RELATIONS FOR A TIME, BUT THEN THAT

PROGRESS STOPPED AND WE BEGAN TO GO BACKWARDS.

>> THE REPORT THAT YOU GUYS WERE SAID TO RELEASE AT THE

END OF FEBRUARY AND BEGINNING OF MARCH IN 1968, YOU GUYS

WERE DOING BACKGROUND, BUT THE WASHINGTON POST GOT A HOLD OF

THE REPORT AHEAD OF TIME.

SOMEONE LEAKED IT TO THEM.

WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THAT?

>> WELL, WE HAD -- FIRST I SHOULD SAY, WE MADE A MISTAKE

IN NOT HAVING OUR HEARINGS.

WE HAD HEARINGS FOR SOMETHING LIKE 20 STRAIGHT DAYS.

WE HEARD FROM EVERYBODY LIKE ALL THE WAY FROM FBI DIRECTOR,

EDGAR HOOVER, TO MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND WE MADE A

MISTAKE NOT HAVING THOSE AS PUBLIC HEARINGS.

WE ALSO MADE A MISTAKE, I THINK, OF NOT TAKING THE PRESS

WITH US AS WE WENT AROUND TO THE RIOT CITIES SO THEY COULD

SEE IT PERSONALLY.

AND WE ALSO MADE A MISTAKE, I THINK, NOT BRIEFING PRESIDENT

JOHNSON ALL ALONG SO THAT HE SAW THE SAME THINGS WE DID.

SO, WE KNEW THAT WHEN THIS REPORT CAME OUT, WHEN IT SAID

RACISM AND IT TALKED ABOUT SPENDING MORE MONEY AGAINST

POVERTY, THAT WAS GOING TO BE SOMEWHAT OF A SHOCK.

SO WE GAVE THE REPORT OUT WITH AN EMBARGO SO THAT PEOPLE

WOULD HAVE A CHANCE TO BE BACKGROUNDED AND LEARN SORT OF

WHAT WAS BEHIND OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.

THEN, I THINK WITH THAT INTENT IN ORDER TO LESSEN ITS

IMPACTS, SOMEBODY LEAKED THE REPORT TO THE WASHINGTON POST

AND TRIED TO TALK THEM OUT OF USING IT, BUT THEY SAID THEY

GOT IT LEGALLY AND THEY WERE NOT GOING TO DO THAT, THEY

WERE GOING TO PUBLISH IT THE NEXT MORNING.

AND SO WE SAID, WELL, WE ARE GOING TO GIVE IT TO EVERYBODY

THEN.

IT WAS JUST ABSOLUTE CHAOS.

I REMEMBER, FOR EXAMPLE, AN AP REPORTER CALLING ME THAT

EVENING AND HE SAID, I HAVE GOT A 30 MINUTE DEADLINE.

HERE IS A REPORT THAT IS ABOUT 400 AND SOME PAGES LONG AND HE

SAID, I HAVE A 30 MINUTE DEADLINE, CAN YOU CAPSULIZE IT

FOR ME?

THE RESULT WAS THAT THE HEADLINES ALL ACROSS THE

COUNTRY, THE POST AND EVERYWHERE ELSE WERE SOMETHING

LIKE, WHITE RACISM CAUSE OF BLACK RIOTS, COMMISSION SAYS.

MY OWN FATHER, WHO LOVED ME, SMALL FARMER OUT IN WEST

OKLAHOMA, THE WAY HE HEARD THAT COMMISSION REPORT, WAS

MR.

HARRIS, OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF YOUR HEART, YOU

OUGHT TO PAY MORE TAXES IN ORDER TO HELP POOR BLACK

PEOPLE WHO ARE RIOTING IN DETROIT.

AND MY DAD'S RESPONSE WAS SOMETHING LIKE, THE HELL WITH

THAT I AM ALREADY PAYING TOO MUCH TAXES AND HE WAS RIGHT

ABOUT THAT.

WE ALSO -- WE DIDN'T MAKE CLEAR ENOUGH AND WE DID SAY IN

THE REPORT, THAT WE WERE INTERESTED IN POVERTY,

WHEREVER IT WAS, RURAL OR URBAN, WE WERE INTERESTED IN

PROBLEMS OF WHITE PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE, HISPANIC AND

AMERICAN INDIANS AND OTHERS, BUT MY DAD NEVER HEARD THAT

PART OF IT AND I THINK A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE DIDN'T EITHER.

HE WAS INTERESTED IN HIS LIFE AND HIS PROBLEMS RATHER THAN

THE PEOPLE WHO HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN THE RIOTS.

>> PRESIDENT JOHNSON WAS SO COMMITTED TO FIGHTING POVERTY

IN THE POVERTY PROGRAMS, WHY DIDN'T HE ADOPT SOME OF THE

RECOMMENDATIONS?

>> WE HAD MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH HIM, ALL THE CURRENT

COMMISSION AND PRINCIPAL STAFF, TO MEET WITH HIM AND

DELIVER THE REPORT AND THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN SET UP AND WE

KNOW THAT NOW, WE DIDN'T THEN, BUT SINCE FOUND THE LETTERS,

HE HAD -- THE STAFF HAD WRITTEN LETTERS FOR HIM TO

SIGN PRAISING THIS REPORT AND THANKING US AND SO FORTH, BUT

HE SAID, I AM NOT GOING TO SIGN THOSE AND HE NEVER DID.

BUT, WE UNDERSTOOD FROM THE WHITE HOUSE STAFF THAT A TEXAS

MEMBER OF CONGRESS, A CLOSE FRIEND OF JOHNSON'S, HAD SAID

TO HIM, THIS COMMISSION, THE CURRENT COMMISSION, IS GOING

TO RUIN YOU.

WE UNDERSTOOD THESE WERE HIS WORDS, THAT IT DOESN'T HAVE --

IT CONDONES AND ENCOURAGES RIOTS AND IT DOESN'T HAVE A

GOOD WORD TO SAY ABOUT ALL YOU HAVE DONE AGAINST POVERTY AND

RACISM.

ALL OF WHICH WAS FALSE BUT JOHNSON, I THINK, BELIEVED IT.

HE CANCELED THE MEETING WITH US.

WE HAD ASKED ALSO THAT HE GIVE US ANOTHER SIX MONTHS OF LIFE

SO WE CAN ADVOCATE FOR AND LOBBY FOR OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.

OF COURSE, THAT NEVER HAPPENED AND AS I SAID, THAT IS A

REALLY SAD THING BECAUSE MISINFORMED, THAT IS THE

ACTION HE TOOK, JOHNSON, BUT IT IS SAD TO ME BECAUSE

JOHNSON, AS I SAID, DID MORE AGAINST POVERTY AND AGAINST

RACISM THAN ANY OF HIS PREDECESSORS OR SUCCESSORS

SINCE.

>> NOW, YOU WERE SEAT MATES WITH SENATOR ROBERT F. KENNEDY

FROM NEW YORK, AND IN 1968 POVERTY WAS ON HIS MIND, WOULD

BE UNTIL HIS ASSASSINATION DURING HIS PRESIDENTIAL

CAMPAIGN.

HOW DID HE RESPOND TO THE REPORT?

>> DURING THE STUDY, YOU KNOW, HE WAS SENATOR FROM NEW YORK

AND REALLY SAW, AS JOHNSON DID, MAYOR LINDSEY AS A

POTENTIAL RIVAL.

JOHNSON THOUGHT LINDSEY WAS GOING TO RUN AGAINST HIM FOR

PRESIDENT.

HE LATER DID RERUN FOR PRESIDENT.

BUT KENNEDY SAID TO ME JOKINGLY, HE SAID, WHAT IT IS

LIKE TO WORK WITH JOHN LINDSEY, EXPECTING ME TO SAY,

WELL, YOU KNOW, HE IS JUST A DILATANT AND WHATEVER.

AND I SAID, HE IS REALLY TERRIFIC.

I SAID, HE IS REALLY ENGAGED.

HE NEVER MISSED A MEETING AND IS INVOLVED AND IDEAS ARE

TERRIFIC IN DOING SOMETHING ABOUT RACISM AND POVERTY.

AND ROBERT WAS A LITTLE BIT INCREDULOUS, BUT IT WAS GOOD

FOR HIM TO HEAR THAT, BUT HE WAS VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THE

REPORT WHEN IT CAME OUT. AND HE CAUSED SENATOR JOE

CLARK, CHAIRMAN IN THE SENATE, TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS SO

THAT WE COULD COME AND TESTIFY BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE IN

FAVOR OF OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.

>> MARTIN LUTHER KING IS ASSASSINATED, ROBERT KENNEDY

IS ASSASSINATED.

PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON IS ELECTED ON A LAW AND ORDER

PLATFORM.

WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS DURING HIS

PRESIDENCY?

>> WE STILL HAD PROGRESS FOR A WHILE, AS I SAID, ON RACE AND

POVERTY, BUT ABOUT THE TIME OF THE ADVENT OF THE REAGAN-BUSH

ADMINISTRATION, THAT IS WHEN THE PROGRESS STOPPED.

NIXON REALLY TRIED TO MAKE HAY OUT OF THE RIOTS, YOU KNOW,

LAW AND ORDER AND SO FORTH AND IN A WAY SORT OF SPEAKING IN

CODE ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE.

AND THEY HAD A SOUTHERN STRATEGY, WHICH EVERYBODY

KNOWS NOW, AND I THINK REAGAN DID TOO, SO THAT THINGS WENT

BACKWARDS AND THAT IS THE WAY IT HAS BEEN EVER SINCE THE

ADVENT OF THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION, WITH THE

EXCEPTION OF THE TIME WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS IN, WE BEGAN

TO MAKE A LITTLE PROGRESS AGAIN, AND THEN FELL

BACKWARDS, AND THEN WHEN OBAMA CAME IN, HE MADE SOME PROGRESS

AGAIN, BUT I AM AFRAID MOVED BACKWARDS AGAIN.

>> DID WE MAKE PROGRESS DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WITH

SOME OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXAMINATIONS INTO

POLICE LIKE HERE IN ALBUQUERQUE?

>> PRESIDENT OBAMA APPOINTED A COMMISSION TO MAKE

RECOMMENDATIONS IN REGARD TO THE POLICE, REALLY GOOD

RECOMMENDATIONS, BUT, I DON'T THINK MUCH WAS DONE AFTER THAT

FROM THE FEDERAL LEVEL AT TRYING TO GET THEM

IMPLEMENTED.

SO, WE HAD ALL OF THESE HORRIBLE POLICE KILLINGS OF

BLACK YOUNG MEN AND NOT IN ANY INSTANCE HAS ANYBODY EVER BEEN

CONVICTED ON TRIAL, NO POLICE OFFICER, AND I THINK THERE WAS

A GREAT DEAL OF ATTITUDE CHANGES THAT IS NECESSARY AND

I THINK WE HAVE GOT TO USE LAPEL CAMERAS MUCH MORE AND

GET BACK TO COMMUNITY POLICING AGAIN.

STOP THIS MILITARIZATION OF THE POLICE, WHERE SHOOTING IS

SORT OF A FIRST -- I THINK NORMALLY WHAT YOU DO IS SEND

IN SOME TEAM THAT IS GOING TO TRY TO SORT OF CUT DOWN THE

PROBLEMS THAT ARE CONFRONTING THE POLICE IN THOSE INSTANCES,

RATHER THAN THE SWAT TEAM.

>> IT HAS BEEN 50 YEARS SINCE THE REPORT, ALMOST 50 YEARS,

YOU'RE ABOUT TO RELEASE THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE

REPORT, UPDATE ON RACE AND POVERTY IN AMERICA.

WHAT IS THIS NEW REPORT GOING TO TELL US?

>> QUITE SADLY, THE INEQUALITY OF INCOME AND WEALTH IN THE

COUNTRY HAS WORSENED GREATLY SINCE THE TIME OF THE PRIMARY

REPORT IN 1968.

AND, WE ARE RESEGREGATING IN OUR CITIES AND HOUSING AND IN

SCHOOLS AND THAT IS REALLY BAD.

WE FIND THAT THE INCOMES OF AFRICAN AMERICANS AND

HISPANICS AND SO FORTH, OTHER MINORITIES, HAVE NOT INCREASED

AS OTHERS HAVE AND IT TURNS OUT, ACTUALLY, IN FAIRLY

RECENT YEARS, THERE HAS BEEN A STAGNATION OF WAGES AND INCOME

FOR MIDDLE INCOME AND POOR PEOPLE GENERALLY.

THE TAXES HAVE BEEN CUT FOR RICH PEOPLE AND THERE IS AN

EFFORT NOW TO TRY TO DO MORE OF THAT.

YOU KNOW, WITH THE IDEA THAT IT STIMULATES ECONOMIC GROWTH

AND SO FORTH, WHICH WE PROVED TO BE WRONG RIGHT HERE IN NEW

MEXICO AS IN KANSAS AND ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE COUNTRY

OR IN THE WORLD.

SO, THINGS ARE REALLY TOUGHER.

POVERTY IS HARDER TO GET OUT OF NOW THAN IT WAS BACK IN OUR

DAY.

A LOT OF THESE MEDIATING INSTITUTIONS HAVE DISAPPEARED

IN THE CENTRAL CITIES.

PEOPLE, A LOT OF CENTRAL CITIES HAVE BEGUN TO GENTRIFY,

SO THAT POVERTY HAS BEEN SORT OF TRANSLATED OUT TO THE

SUBURBS AND IN SOME CASES, THE EXURBS, AND WE HAVE REALLY CUT

DOWN ON THE MONEY THAT WE HAVE BEEN SPENDING ON -- REAL

DOLLARS -- ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING AND ON JOB CREATION

AND SO FORTH.

AND THAT IS WHAT IS HUGELY NEEDED.

WHEN JOHN LINDSEY AND I WERE WALKING AROUND TO THESE RIOT

CITIES THEN IN 1968, WE ENCOUNTERED OFTEN ON THE

STREETS, YOUNG BLACK MEN OF THE TYPE THAT COULD HAVE BEEN

INVOLVED IN THE RIOTS IN THAT CITY AND WHAT THEY ALL SAID TO

US, ALMOST IN A CHORUS, WAS JOBS.

THEY SAID JOBS, BABY.

JOBS, BABY.

THAT IS WHAT WE NEED IS JOBS.

CINCINNATI, STREETS OF CINCINNATI, ONE BLACK MAN, ONE

GUY SAID, MR.

JOHNSON GOT ME A JOB LAST SUMMER, TALKING ABOUT

PRESIDENT JOHNSON IN THE SUMMER PROGRAM BUT THAT RAN

OUT.

HE SAID, WE NEED JOBS, BABY.

AND THAT WAS THE GREATEST NEED AND IT IS TODAY.

>> INEQUALITY AND POVERTY THAT YOU SPEAK OF TODAY, 50 YEARS

LATER, WE DON'T HAVE TO ACCEPT THAT AS A NATION; RIGHT?

>> POVERTY IS A DECISION.

YOU KNOW.

WE DECIDE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ALL THIS POVERTY.

THAT IS NOT TRUE.

WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE IT.

WE GET OUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT, THERE IS PLENTY OF

MONEY TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

AND THERE ARE PLENTY OF JOBS THAT NEED DOING THAT WE OUGHT

TO BE SURE, FOR EXAMPLE, WE OUGHT TO BE INVESTING IN THE

NEW KIND OF JOBS IN TECHNOLOGY AND WIND AND SOLAR AND ENERGY,

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY, AND SO FORTH, PLENTY OF JOBS LIKE

THAT, AND CHILD CARE AND PARTICULARLY IN EDUCATION, AND

HEALTH.

WE HAVE GOT PLENTY OF JOBS THAT NEED DOING AND THERE IS A

LOT OF PEOPLE THAT NEED THOSE JOBS.

>> SENATOR FRED HARRIS, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US, WE REALLY

APPRECIATE IT.

For more infomation >> Episode 1122 | Former U.S. Senator Fred Harris - Duration: 25:19.

-------------------------------------------

Lakeland Current 1107 - A Visit with US Congressman Rick Nolan - Duration: 28:02.

♪ Lakeland Currents, your public affairs

program for north central Minnesota. Produced by Lakeland

Public Television with Host Ray Gildow.

Production funding for Lakeland Currents is made possible by Bemidji

Regional Airport, serving the region with daily flights to Minneapolis-St. Paul

International Airport. More information available at

bemidjiairport.org. Closed captioning for Lakeland

Currents is sponsored by Nisswa Tax Service. Tax preparation

for businesses and individuals. Online at

nisswatax.com.

Ray: Hello again everyone and welcome to Lakeland Currents.

The eighth congressional district is a

geographic huge place.

27,500 square miles if you can imagine how big that

is. The anchor of this is

the city of Duluth which is Minnesota's fifth largest city

and about 63/64 percent of the people

who live in the eight district are considered to be urban

not...or are considered to be rural rather not urban.

And it's my great pleasure today to have the congressman

from the eighth district here, Rick Nolan. And

welcome to Lakeland Currents. Rick: Well, thank you I'm delighted to be here.

It's great program, great show and a

great congressional district. By the way, it's bigger than 10 states.

Ray: Is it really? Rick: Yeah, yeah. It's huge. Ray: Wow! I can believe that cause it's

long. Rick: It's pretty hard to go anywhere without getting

you know, at least three or four hours coming and going

in the car. Ray: And you know, at one time it was

completely democratic when it was a little bit of a different geographic

stretch than it is now. [Yeah] And over the last few elections it's

been a lot closer balance between republican and

democratic. But the Iron Range

area, the Duluth area, still I would guess is pretty much

democratic. That's probably where...Rick: Well, it is pretty good although

you know, there's this Nate Silver, he's kind of

the quintessential guru of campaigns

and election analysis. And he analyzes

every district in the country for their competitiveness.

And he just finished analyzing

194

democrats. He'll do the same for the republicans

but mine is the most difficult race in the

country for a democrat to win. [Wow] And

so, and on a...some of the recent

polling we're seeing on just a generic

basis, you know, we're going to vote for

would you vote for the democrat or the republican? The republican

wins by about six points. Our most recent

polling still shows me winning by about a similar amount

So, but it's a very very competitive district until

this thing in Georgia, it was the most competitive

or expensive in the country. It was well

over 20 million dollars, which is just obscene.

Begs to question, you know, how does this happen?

And we need to fix and change...that.

Ray: During the Jim Obestair...Oberstar

era rather, pretty much reliable district

for the democrats, wasn't it. Rick: Oh gosh! I mean you could never

call any state wide election until the

eight district vote came in. Because it was always gonna

be huge, it was gonna be 60-75 percent democratic

but it's not like that at all anymore. Ray: So now,

from my perspective, whoever represents the district and you are

representing it now in your second term it's just

a tight rope to walk, isn't it? Because if you look at

supporting say, mining issues? You're gonna have the

environmentalists who are against that. [Yeah] And I don't know

if people who don't get involved with politics understand

how challenging that is to balance

these things out. Rick: Well, it...truly is.

And you know, you and I are in the same

age bracket even though you look a lot younger than I do. [Yeah right]

Yeah, um. [laughter] So but you remember when we were kids

I mean the rivers were running sewers and the lakes were catching

on fire and acid rain was destroying the forest.

The narrative then was you know, we can't

have all these environmental rules and regulations or nobody

will be able to do any business. And

unfortunately now that narrative has flopped

they're flipped. And you have people saying

well, we can't do any mining or

manufacturing....

because then we won't have an environment. But there were

many of us then and who continue now myself included,

to say no, no. We've got the brains, we got the science. We certainly

have the needs, just muster up the political will.

We should be able to do both. And we proved

that we could. I mean, and we didn't

know how they were gonna do it, Ray.

But you know the automobile industry came up with a catalytic

converter to scrub the sulphur out of

automobile exhaust. And we stopped the acid rain.

The power companies and the paper mills came up with scrubbers

to take the toxins and other

pollutants that were going into the rivers and the lakes.

And we even have a thing now called reverse osmosis

which we did not have back in the day. You can take a

pump and push some kind of a liquid through

it and you can filter out a virus. You know, how many

parts of sulphur per million do you want? You know,

300, 100, 10, 0? Obviously it gets

more expensive the more you want to dial it

down. But I'm of the view that we still

have the smarts, the brains, the technology

and the technologies keep growing and....

getting better all the time. And

we....have I think a

profound obligation to do both.

Ray: You and the governor both have supported now the mining

project up in north east Minnesota.

And could you just talk a little bit about that? Rick: Sure, sure.

Before I do, I want to point out one thing. I just attended

a lecture here recently by a doctor

Jim Boyer, who's written a book called "The

Irresponsible Pursuit of Paradise".

And he talks about how dependent we are

upon the import of so many of these

extracted minerals that are responsible

for our communications, responsible and

necessary. Ray: Copper, uranium. Rick: Yeah, copper, nickel, iron

ore, you name it. And we're actually

exporting....

the need for these minerals

to developing countries around the world where they have no

enviro...virtually no environmental rules and regulations.

And a great deal of human exploitation.

And that's something that people I think have to start

thinking about. We don't want to be a bunch of...a nation of

nimbies exporting

and degradating everybody elses environment in the world.

Especially when we have the capacity and we have the most

rigorous rules and regulations anywhere in the world. We have the capacity to

do it here and do it well. Polymet

is a good case and point. They've

undergone 12 years of scrutinization.

They've been approved by the EPA

by the Forestry

by Interior by the DNR

by the PCA, by Fish

and Wildlife Services. And time and time and again

they've been asked to go back to the board

and to demonstrate what kind of abatement procedures

they're going to use. And demonstrate their

effectiveness. And

so I've been the same ol' guy I always was. I've

been an ardent supporter of the environment but I'm an ardent supporter

of mining as well.

And....I gotta tell you something else

that people haven't thought about in this. Of course it's important

for the jobs and the economy in northern Minnesota.

But guess what, Homeland Security just did a

study recently and they found

that 13 percent of the nations gross national

product goes through the lochs

at the Sioux Narrows. Now why is that relevant to us? That

that's how Lake Superior gets into the Great Lakes.

And the bulk of that material

is iron ore from MInnesota's range going

through the port of Duluth. And

the study concluded that if those lochs failed

it would throw the country into a great depression. [Wow] Because

that ore supplies all the Great Lake steel mills

and they supply the automobile industry and all the heavy

industrials. Which is why we have

military protection there. Because again if that

failed because we shut down the mines or the

fail just from obsolescence

and or they were some kind of an asymmetrical

or overt military tact, it would throw the country into a great

depression and put seven million people

out of business. So,

bottom line is you know, I've been working to get the

and I've gotten a considerable amount of money to do a feasibility

study cause the lochs are obsolete and they're causing a lot

of trouble. But more

importantly this mining here in northern MInnesota is of

course important for us. But it's important for the whole country. Our national

security, our national economy. And

tourism is important too. So we have to make sure that

we impose and insist on these rigorous state

and federal standards. But for the most part, industry

is ok with that. You know, they used to fight that. They now understand that

American people expect you know, good strong

standards. So as long as we have those good standards in place there's no reason

why we can't do mining and have

continuous of the clean water and healthy

atmosphere we have up here in the eighth district. We have the cleanest water

in the state, by the way. Ray: In the eighth district. Right. Rick: We want to keep it that way, yup.

Ray: Some of the key issues facing

the eighth district are the same issues facing all of Minnesota.

Health care is certainly one of them. [Yeah] And now

this week as they start negotiating the tax

bill, at least on the senate side or the

house I can't remember which is, it looks like they might

start looking at that American health care or the

American... Rick: Yeah the ACA.

Ray: ACA. And taking... Rick: Yeah, American...otherwise known as Obamacare. Ray: Taking out

the requirement that you have to have insurance. Rick: Yeah, yeah.

Ray: What's your take on what's....[Yeah]

it's hard to figure out what's going on. I don't believe... Rick: Yeah, well it's a

moving target. It's just changing. Ray: I suspect that you are the answer to all this.

Rick: No, no. It's changing from day to day. But

the essential challenge

here is is that under

the current system, outside

of Medicare and some Medicaid

everybody in America has got a different insurance policy.

Depending on how old you are, what your health is, what

your income is, how many children you have, how many

dependents you have, what's your zip code.

And it's become an administrative nightmare.

I introduced the...one of the

first single payer proposals when I had served

in the congress back in the 70's. There were only four of us

that supported it at the time. Ray: And what is single payer?

Rick: You know, first of all it's what most of

the rest of the wor...developed countries in the world do.

And.....and

they get better results and they pay

dramatically less for health care than we do.

It's so fundamentally American. And here's what it is.

Everybody's got the same policy, ok?

So administratively you'd do it for two-three percent.

Instead of 30, 40, 50 percent.

And....and everybody

everybody pays. So...

between...and everybody pays the same rate.

Ray: Nineteen different. Rick: So everybody pays, everybody pays the same rate

and everybody pays. It's a wonderful

formula. And of course it doesn't cover some of the more

exotic plastic surgery but it covers all the

basics. So all the developed countries...and they do that

that's fundamentally what Medicare is. Which is why

a number of people have called you know, for Medicare

for all. Because that's a single payer, it's not a socializing..

it's not socializing medical care. But

it...the doctors remain independent

businesses providing health

services. But I wanted to tell you when I introduced this

there were four of us back in the 70's, ok? And oh my

gosh, the medical community they were so upset with me. My

gosh. It was frightening sometimes to go to a public

meeting. I was afraid I'd get my tongue or ripped out or my eyes

ripped out. And they spent a lot of money trying

to defeat me. Well, here we are you know, quite some

years later. We have 130 sponsors

now. And guess who's contributing to my campaign?

The American Medical Association and the medical doctors. [Really?] Why?

I've had a doctor in Duluth tell me he's spending

90 percent, and I think on average they say they're

spending about 50 percents of their time and their money

in their offices processing all of these

insurance claims. Ray: I've had doctors on the show and they all say the

same thing. Rick: Yeah, and that's not what they went into medicine for. They went

into medicine to....it's a healing

arts profession. They want to heal people and fix people. They don't want to sit

around being medical insurance

process claimers.

So, that's exciting. And we're building more and

more support for that. And we're gonna get there.

And I'm confident that it's just gonna take a little

more time. Ray: I believe last year you were voted

as one of the most successful

congressman in working across the

aisle. Rick: You know, I was. And it....

it actually wasn't a vote

several of the Universities, Virginia and Vanderbelt

they just looked at bills and amendments that

all the members of congress had introduced and followed them

to see how many of them had become law of the

land. And I'm proud to say

that I became...I was the second most effective

of all 194 democrats in

the house. And one of the ten most effective.

And then they concluded from that being that

I'm in the minority and I remind myself and others

that I had bi-partisan support for all

that legislation. And....

you know you and I were talking earlier about

the....

George Washington's farewell address. And how

poignant it is for today. It was kind of a message

for future generations.

Where he said the greatest threats to democracy

were as......

as I recall, one is excessive partisanship. [Correct] We certainly

got that today. [Yup] The other

was the accumulation of massive deficits.

And we certainly

have that today. And the

third one was

influence by foreign governments on our politics. And we

certainly have that today. What

an incredibly visionary view Washington had. Ray: And I think there

was something even about the president

or the whoever is in power, starting to have influence

in the department of justice and some of those people to

use those for their own political game. I think that

was another one. The things he touched on. Rick: Yeah, yeah. One of the things that we needed

to be aware of if we wanted to preserve and protect... Ray: So it's kind of an ironic

Rick: And the other thing about it was is that

you know, he epitomized stability.

And integrity. You know, never tell a lie.

He just....he

made people then proud of our

government and our way of life

and to this day

as our first president he makes us proud.

And there's been a tremendous degradation

of civility and

kindness and integrity in government. And it breaks

your heart to see so many people losing

faith and trust in their governmental processes.

It's a...there's a lot of

things that need fixing and I've got some ideas about how we fix them.

But they definitely need fixing and I think we

can all agree on that. Ray: One of the things you talked about when you

were here two years ago was the pressure that's on

incoming congressmen and senators to

raise money. [Yeah] Is that still...[Oh...]

is that still the same pressure you're dealing with? Rick: Yeah, it

is. It's only gotten worse, Ray. [Really?] Yeah.

They tell....

the new members that they should spend 25-30 hours

a week in the call centers [Wow] across the

street. [Wow]

And then you should have another 10 hours a week

in actual fundraising events.

And you know...

in my case...it's an eight hour trip

out to Washington door to door.

And I go out and come back every week.

So, you know do the math on that. And...

Ray: Aren't enough hours. Rick: I made a decision I said I'm not

going to go to the call centers. They never used

to exist when I served before or any other point in

history. I just said, look at this stage in my life

being a chance to go and serve and pay it forward

pay it back, because life's been good to our generation. And that's what's

getting away from this country. I said, I didn't go out to Washington

to become a middle level telemarketer. And

dialing for dollars. So I haven't.

So you know, I like to say my success as a legislator

is my ability to reach across the aisle. Find

public partners. But part of it just going to work on the peoples business

instead of going across the street raising money for yourself. [Sure]

It ain't a big secret. And I don't care what business

you're in, if you don't show up and go to work you're not gonna

get anything done. So it ain't rocket science. But I

want to see....this citizens united

reversed. That allows all this dark

money in the politics most of which is negative

and degrading of a camp...discourages good people

from running for public office. I think we need a system of

small donor contribution

supplemented by public financing.

I think we need to fix gerrymandering, the fact that there's 435

seats in the congress and only 24 of them are

competitive. That's not real democracy.

We need to have regular order. Right now I just

saw a report yesterday this

current congress has had more closed rules

than any other congress in the history of the country.

When I served before everything came up under an open

rule. If you had an idea, you offered it. And you debated

it and you argued it and that's how you find common ground.

But this healthcare legislation some

of which would put as many as 25-30 million people

on the streets without health care. And never

been presented and it with an opportunity to

make an amendment. The congress

the house just recently passed the

a tax bill under a closed rule.

Didn't matter if you were Rick Nolan or

Clem Kiddipelhopper you know, from Alabama.

If you had an amendment you wanted to offer you didn't get a

chance. It was voted up or down. [Wow] That's not real

democracy. [No, no] Real democracy is a lot of work.

You have to hear everybody out and make some tough decisions

but now it's mostly just partisan positioning

and one party ruling and shutting

everybody else out. Ray: Let's just talk a little bit about

that tax legislation because that is

the criticism coming from lots of places.

That this is being rushed through you know

after Thanksgiving there was gonna be or was a vote

and it's not involving

people even from industry or people from

the colleges [No] who are experts and economists

and those people when they get a chance to start looking

at the legislation they're pretty much petrified by what

they're seeing. And it's....you know the same

[inaudible] made against the democrats with Obamacare. That that

stuff was ran through. But that took over a

year to develop that legislation. [It did] And this legislation

for the taxes taking them weeks. Rick: We....yeah

we didn't have one minute of hearing on this tax bill

that the house recently passed. And

I am of the belief that if we had a vote

on whether or not kids who are struggling with

their education, well they're no longer kids anymore, they're paying

their student debt. If we had a vote on whether or not the interest

on their loans should be deductible we'd

win that. You know? If we had a vote on whether

or not your state and local taxes should be deductible

we'd win that. If we had a vote on whether

charitable contributions or you name it...you know

we would win those. But we don't have any votes on that.

Everybody that's...contacted me in my office

you know, in the run up to this

tax debate has really

serious problems with it. Our Minnesota commissioners

determine that under the house passed bill

450,000 Minnesotans are gonna get a tax increase.

They found that...

320,000 people would lose the deductibility

on the interest for their college education

loan. Geez, Ray, you know when you and I went to

college it was about a 100 bucks a quarter. Ray: Yeah, it was pretty reasonable. Rick: I mean it was virtually

free. Huh, come on?! Ray: Yeah it was. Rick: So,

and the truth of the matter is if somebody

does get a tax break under this thing in the middle class

although the CBO, Congressional Budget Office,

said anybody making under 70,000 dollars a

year is going to get a tax increase.

If you did it'd be...if you did get a break it'd be enough to

buy a hubcap on a Mercedes Benz. Ray: Not a new car.

Rick: But you know, the upper one percenters you know, they'll

be able to buy the whole Mercedes Benz.

Maybe a fleet of them. There's 1...1.5

trillion dollars in tax breaks for the upper one percent.

Ray: And it's increasing the debt significantly. Rick: And

pass...well....the things most egregious about

this are one, that's passing that debt onto our children,

that's unconscionable, 1.5 trillion

dollars. And then this huge tax

break for the super millionaires and billionaires the

one percenter. I'm sorry, they're not struggling. I don't know

a lot of them but I do happen to know a couple of them.

And they're doing just fine. And

and then it's going to impose a tax

increase on the middle class that's struggling so hard.

It's a terrible bill, terrible bill. Bodes very poorly

for our countries future. At a time when the rich are getting

richer in degrees unparalleled. The middle class is getting

crushed every which way they turn. And

and the poor just getting poorer. And

the disparity in wealth has never been

so great in this country since just before

the great depression. So that does not bode well. Ray: So...

when you have private conversations with your peers,

across the aisle, they must feel some of the

pressure of dealing with this too. Even though maybe they

have to take the party line. Rick: Oh, they do, yeah. Ray: Because my experience

has been when you get politicians in the back rooms and they're

alone they're just like we are. Rick: Yeah,

you know Mark Meadows heads that

tea party liberty conference or caucus.

He's one of my better friends there in the congress.

And you know what? He and the tea party's

not happy about the fact that everything's being decided in

the speakers office. You know, they didn't come there for the photo opp

either whether you agree with them or not.

We can find agreement on the fact that we need regular

order where everybody's got an opportunity to

offer their amendments and they have them argued and debated

and voted on. You know,

generally I talk to my republican colleagues, you know what's going to

happen next week or next week or what's gonna be in the bill

and they say, I don't know. You know, they're not included.

Ray: That's pretty discouraging. Rick: It's very discouraging. Ray: We're down to

our last few minutes and I know you wanted to talk a little bit about

aquatic invasive species cause I think you've done some work in that

area. Rick: Yeah I have. I most recently got

an extra million dollars

for a....aquatic invasive species

research. You know, we've seen here in the

Brainerd lakes area how rapidly zebra mussels

have expanded. And to the extent that that can

continues, it bodes very poorly for

you know our sport fishing. Which is such an integral

important part of our life and our economy.

We've....

gotta find ways, better ways, to

abate this. We've gotta do more research. You know, to

find ways to stop it

and limit it. And that's just one of 100 or more other

invasive species that have come in who are threatening

our tourism, our sport fishing.

You know, I don't know about what your dad but my dad always

said you know, Richard, if you think you don't have time

for fishing you're just wrong. [laughter] And I said,

how's that dad? It's cause he says, everyday someone goes fishing

adds a day to their life, it doesn't count on their span of life. Ray: Ah, that's very good

philosophy yes. Rick: And we've got to do a better job on

that. Ray: That tourism is so huge

in Minnesota. [Yeah] And the spiny water

fleas, zebra mussels, you name it...

it's exploding. It's growing and growing.

CWD in our deer. [Oh yeah]

I just talked to a friend who just came back from Montana,

22 percent of the deer tested in Montana have

CWD. [Wow] You know, it's not an invasive species

they don't really know. It's a....

it's effecting the nervous system. Rick: Some kind of a parasite. And it's threatening

the.... Ray: It's like the mad cow disease almost. Rick: Yeah, threatening the moose

population as well. [Yeah absolutely] By the way, I was just saying also

you know how important the loon is...I mean

what an iconic....

bird and symbol for the beauty of our great

lakes in northern Minnesota. Crosslake Minnesota

is busy with an initiative to create a

national loon center. Ray: Oh really? Rick: I just had lunch...yeah.

I just had lunch with the president

of the Audubon Society and believe

it or not, the loon is on their list

of 300 species

most likely to be extinct by the

end of the century. [Wow] Zebra mussels,

they have a parasite in them, there were 10,000 loons

have lost their life from zebra mussels. So...

Ray: Pretty sad. Very sad. Rick: Yeah, so we gotta get going

and so much of this involves research.

And you gotta put the money up there to do the

research to find how you abate these, how you protect our

important species. Ray: We've run out of time. Rick: Dog gone it! Ray: I appreciate

your jumping on with us and sharing some of this

information. How do people get in touch with you if they want to? Rick: You know,

just go on the web and just put in there Richard

Nolan, member of congress. Ray: Congressman eight district. Rick: Yeah.

And they can get our...we get...I get

anywhere from a 1,000 to several thousand communications every

week. [Wow] And I value it, I appreciate it. My

staff gives me a report on every single one of them.

I look forward to...that's one of the first things I do every Monday

when I come into the office is look at the correspondence. Ray: Thank

you very much for appearing on the show. Rick: Thank you, Ray. Ray: You've been watching Lakeland

Currents where we're talking about what you're talking about. I'm

Ray Gildow so long until next time.

For more infomation >> Lakeland Current 1107 - A Visit with US Congressman Rick Nolan - Duration: 28:02.

-------------------------------------------

David MacNaughton, Canada's Ambassador to the United States (Brief) - Duration: 0:52.

[Music]

You know, when I go in the office in the

morning, I still pinch myself.

It's an honour and a privilege to represent your country

in anything, but to have that and that responsibility,

you know, I take it very seriously.

All of the superstructure in politics is set up

you know, for men.

We're having to look at all of the things, the

systemic issues that have made it more difficult for

women to play a full, meaningful role.

Things are opening up for women, but we

haven't done enough yet, there's way more to do.

If we don't do a better job of

making everyone feel as if they're part of these

trade agreements, we won't be able to get them done.

Put yourself in the other person's shoes because if you

don't put yourself in their shoes,

you'll end up with a lousy deal.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét