Chủ Nhật, 24 tháng 6, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Jun 24 2018

Coming to you live from California, USA

It's LJ

I said, it's LJ

Aww sh*t

Kathy!

What happened to you and LJ?

I'm just waiting on my Oover, I don't know where LJ is.

Why do you need an Oover? You're a ghost you can fly

I'm a ghost trapped in a human body! Ugh whatever

What am I supposed to do?

Well you're already there!

Do something to entertain them!

But I need some time

I need to find some filler

What the f*ck

Dude I'm tryna f*cking skate! This is bulls*it

Jacka**

What the f*ck

I gotta find something to do for the show

Incoming call? Must be the executives

Hello Executives What's going on?

We come because we that

Your show is not on the air

LJ is missing.

Yes, but if the show does not go on

That is a lot of company money being wasted

Yes, I understand

But it's gonna be hard

To do LJ's World

Without LJ

Look

We're not saying is has to be about LJ, we're saying that the show

Has to be made. It's all written here in the contract

Well you better figure out something!

Keep in mind that this is the first episode! And that if it does not go well...

We are allowed to not order more episodes

Wait so if the episode does not go right...

Then the show will be cancelled? Immediately?

Yes. Immediately cancelled

You're lucky we're giving you an extra chance and extra money.

So if the next episode happens to go wrong

It's all over?

Yes, it will be all over

Right?

*Angry Sigh*

Yes then it will be all over

We're signing off. Don't disappoint us Nikodemiopolous!

I hate working on

This show

But they just gave me my next new idea

All I gotta do

Is make the next episode

Extremely terrible

Then it will be cancelled in a instant

And i'll be free to go back to my home planet to rule

Well then get ready America!

Because in the next episode of LJ's World...

You can expect the...

UN-EX-PECTED

TO BE CONTINUED?

For more infomation >> LJ's World | Episode 1 | Live from California - Duration: 5:06.

-------------------------------------------

What If California Left The USA? - #CaliExit - Duration: 4:15.

After Donald trump wont he US election, The Yes California independence campaign wanted

to begin an initiative to make it so that California became separate from the rest of

the united states.

The hashtag caliexit began trending worldwide.

Its extremely unlikely that California would separate from the united states, but lets

imagine, at least for the next few minutes, what would happen if it did?

Today, Life's biggest questions asks, what if California left the united states?

Hello and welcome back to lifes biggest questions, the channel that imagines the impossible.

I'm your host, charlotte dobre, make sure you leave a like, subscribe and ask us a question

in the comments below.

California would not be the first state to leave the united states.

Back in the 1860s, 11 southern states seceded from the union, but then they re-joined after

the civil war.

For califoria to leave the united states, they would have to vote on a ballot in favour

of leaving the united states.

What the Yes California Independence campaign wanted California to be recognized as a nation

within a nation.

The example they used was Scotland within the united kingdom.

But for the sake of this video, we will examine the possibility of California becoming its

own sovereign nation.

Instead of paying their taxes to the American government, they would keep all the taxes

collected within their own state.

This would result in a substantial budget increase because Californians have paid more

taxes than its received in federal payouts every year since 1995.

That probably has to do with the fact that there are a large number of millionares and

billionares living within California.

Hollywood and silicon valley provide a large fraction of tax dollars to the American government..

The tax dollars that were formerly sent to the us government would be used to build better,

futuristic infrastructure.

Imagine this, High speed hyperloop trains would be built across the country, making

long commutes a thing of the past.

The country would be adorned with skyscrapers that use green energy, with vegetation and

plants growing within them.

Californians would probably develop their own form of currency, perhaps a crypto currency.

But as we saw with brexit, leaving the European union drastically affected the UK economy.

The pound dropped to a 31 year low.

As a result, Britains economy was no longer the 5th biggest in the world, it became the

6th.

That being said, the US dollar as a whole will also go down in value.

One downside to California leaving the rest of the us, is that Californians actually don't

get their water from their own state.

Most of the water Californians drink comes from Colorado, specifically the Colorado river.

The snow and rain falls in the Colorado mountains, then flows down to California.

Its been that way for 94 years.

But if California left the united states, who knows what would happen, Perhaps Colorado

would divert the water back to its own state, leaving California with the task of finding

a different source.

Perhaps all those billions of tax dollars would have to be spent on importing water

from Colorado, or even Canada.

Perhaps California and Canada will become close trade partners, and import food, water,

gas and other goods within them.

That being said, Californias agriculture industry is huge, the biggest in the united states.

It supplies much of the food the rest of Americans eat.

If America shut off their water, California could respond by shutting off the food supply,

creating a trade war.

This would cause the price of fruits and vegetables for the rest of America would skyrocket.

Furthermore, the taxes the rest of americans pay will also skyrocket to make up for the

fact that they aren't receiving taxes from the wealthy Californians anymore.

Maybe another economic recession would also take place.

Furthermore, Not everyone would give up their American passports willingly.

Like with other examples where countries have broken apart, there would likely be many Californians

who would flee California to keep being americans.

The thing is, the united states doesn't even recognize secessionists.

Following the civil war, in1869, the supreme court made it so that any state that rebelled

against the united states would have to win a war against the rest of the country, in

order to be considered its own sovereign nation.

And although California does have a huge military presence, its an American military presence

all the same.

California would have to commandeer US bases like the Vandenberg air force base and threaten

the united states with ballistic missiles.

Yes, California does have its own state military reserve, but it likely couldn't win in a

war against America as a whole.

In conclusion, A caliexit probably wouldn't happen in real life, but that's what people

said about brexit and a donald trump presidency.

Who knows what the future will bring.

For now, I'm charlotte dobre, and you've been watching lifes biggest questions.

If you liked this video, you'll love our playlist, biggest what ifs.

For more infomation >> What If California Left The USA? - #CaliExit - Duration: 4:15.

-------------------------------------------

Autoridades de California anuncian inspecciones a centros de detención en donde hay niños migrantes - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> Autoridades de California anuncian inspecciones a centros de detención en donde hay niños migrantes - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

Pawnee Fire Latest: 400-acre Blaze Prompts Mandatory Evacuation in California Community - Duration: 4:05.

 Officials have asked residents to evacuate several neighborhoods in Clearlake Oaks, California, after an enormous 400-acre fire threatened buildings and lives

 Fire officials issued mandatory evacuations after a fire began to blaze at around 6

00 p.m. local time Saturday. People living in Quail Creek, Wolf Creek and the community of Spring Valley have been asked to leave the area, NBC Bay Area reported

 Early reports indicated the fire stretched across some 75 acres, but estimates quickly grew

The fire began near Pawnee Road and New Long Valley Road. Recommended Slideshows5150 Highest Paying Jobs in the United States5150 Best-Selling Albums in U

S. History51In Pictures: The 50 Most Powerful Military Forces in the World As of 11:48 p

m. PDT Saturday (2.48 a.m. Sunday ET) the fire was zero percent contained, NBC Bay Area reported

  California has been plagued by particularly brutal fires in recent months. December 2017's Thomas Fire—that ripped through Ventura and Santa Barbara—became one of the most damaging in the state's history

The fire, which officials reported was also the largest wildfire to strike modern California, finally stopped just over three weeks ago after burning for about six months

The blaze began on December 4 last year. According to a news release from Los Padres National Forest, the fire burned some 281,893 acres and consumed 1,000 structures before firefighters contained it on January 12

The fire claimed two lives, including CAL FIRE apparatus engineer Cory Iverson. Just a few days ago, firefighters attended another large fire near California's Camp Roberts

 Meanwhile, hundreds of fire personnel are battling Colorado's 416 fire outside of Durango

As of Friday, the fire reached over 34,000 acres and was 37 percent contained. The 416 has been raging since June 1

   This is a developing story and will be updated as more information becomes available

​  

For more infomation >> Pawnee Fire Latest: 400-acre Blaze Prompts Mandatory Evacuation in California Community - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

California's net neutrality legislation just got watered down in a big way - Duration: 6:31.

California's state capitol building. (Flickr / Jeff Turner) Lawmakers in California's State Assembly have weakened a landmark bill aimed at implementing a local version of the Federal Communications Commission's now-defunct net neutrality rules, in a blow to Internet activists who had hoped for stronger measures

Approved by the California Senate last month, the bill sought to impose strict regulations on how broadband providers, such as AT&T and Comcast, may handle Internet content

Key provisions not only banned ISPs from blocking or slowing down websites, but also prohibited the carriers from exempting specific apps and services from wireless data caps for an extra fee, a practice known as zero-rating

The bill as initially proposed, SB 822, could have become the toughest such legislation in the country, with additional provisions that banned providers from charging websites extra fees to reach Internet users

[This crafty tactic may let states get around the FCC on net neutrality] But in a vote Wednesday in a key State Assembly committee, lawmakers led by Chairman Miguel Santiago (D-Los Angeles) moved to strip the bill of some of its central components

 The deleted provisions include the ban that prohibited ISPs from charging websites new fees to access customers, as well as the restrictions on zero-rating

Also deleted were a large section of definitions — without which California's attorney general will have more difficulty prosecuting violations of the legislation, its supporters said

The committee still sought to advance the bill, but the vote drew criticism from Internet activists who accused Santiago of being swayed by broadband industry lobbyists

"The level of corruption we just witnessed literally makes me sick to my stomach," said Evan Greer, a spokeswoman for Fight for the Future, an Internet advocacy group

"The actions of this committee today are an attack not just on net neutrality, but on our democracy

" Campaign finance disclosures show that Santiago has received $22,600 in contributions from AT&T since 2014, and $4,500 from Comcast

In spite of the changes weakening the bill, Santiago said Wednesday that he stands by the FCC's 2015 net neutrality rules, and that the legislation as amended reflects the Obama-era regulations

"Trump's rollback of these regulations are a concern to me, as they should be to every American," Santiago said in a statement

He also responded to his critics' lobbying and campaign finance concerns as "irresponsible at best, and insulting beyond that

" AT&T and Comcast didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Internet providers have argued against tougher net neutrality rules on the grounds that the regulations could discourage investments in network upgrades and prevent ISPs from developing new business models

AT&T has previously urged Congress to write a national net neutrality law that would apply equally to broadband providers and Internet companies alike

 Many of its representatives in Washington have called for something similar. [With Facebook on the ropes, Internet providers seek to press their advantage in Washington] Sen

Scott Wiener (D), who introduced SB 822 in the California Senate earlier this year, said the amendments this week have effectively "eviscerated" his bill

Wiener downplayed the significance of the Internet providers' campaign contributions, saying the committee vote was the result of a simple disagreement among colleagues

"We had a strenuous disagreement here, but to me, it's not about campaign contributions," he said in an interview

"I will say, in general, AT&T and Comcast, they spent a lot of money in California targeting members with Twitter and Facebook ads, doing robo-calls to seniors telling them their bills are going to go up, that this bill is going to make your monthly payment go up

They flooded the capitol with lobbyists." Despite the Assembly's changes to the bill, California could still wind up passing net neutrality legislation in some form in the coming months

The bill now heads to an Assembly committee dealing with privacy issues; further changes to the legislation could come at any point between now and the end of the legislative session in August

Should a net neutrality bill be finalized, analysts say, it could invite a court challenge from Internet providers and possibly the FCC, whose current approach to net neutrality tries to ban states from circumventing its policies

At that point, a lawsuit concerning the scope of the FCC's preemption powers would join the numerous other cases pending on net neutrality

More than 20 states have sued the FCC to overturn the agency's repeal of the national net neutrality rules

Meanwhile, opponents of the rules are waiting to hear whether the Supreme Court could take up a case challenging the regulations as they were approved in 2015

For more infomation >> California's net neutrality legislation just got watered down in a big way - Duration: 6:31.

-------------------------------------------

California wildfire burns 12 buildings, threatens hundreds - Duration: 2:59.

 CLEARLAKE OAKS, Calif. –  A wind-driven wildfire destroyed a dozen buildings and threatened hundreds of others Sunday as it raced across dry brush in rural Northern California

 The Pawnee Fire, which broke out Saturday near the small community of Clearlake Oaks, was one of four wildfires burning in largely rural areas as wind and heat gripped a swath of California from San Jose to the Oregon border

 The blaze destroyed 12 buildings and threatened an additional 600 as it burned out of control across about 2

5 square miles (6.5 square kilometers). It is north of the wine country region where devastating wildfires killed 44 people and destroyed thousands of homes and businesses last October

 Authorities ordered people to evacuate all homes in the residential area of Spring Valley and surrounding areas

Evacuation centers for residents and animals were being opened. No injuries were reported

 "What we're stressing is that people, when they get the evacuation order, they heed it immediately and get out and stay out until it is safe to return," California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Battalion Chief Jonathan Cox said

 "This is one of four large fires burning in Northern California. It's a good reminder that fire season is upon us," he said

 Another blaze consumed 5.5 square miles in nearby Tehama County but did not burn any buildings

Some homes were threatened and some had been evacuated, Cox said, although he did not have specific numbers

It was partially contained.  Another smaller fire, also in Tehama County, was nearly halfway contained after consuming less than a mile of brush

The fourth fire, in neighboring Shasta County, smaller still, was three-fourths contained

 The Pawnee Fire was being driven by erratic winds, low humidity and high temperatures

Firefighters battled it in a rugged area that made it difficult to get engines and other equipment up close

 "It's kind of the worst possible combination," Cox said.  Fire officials had no estimate on when it might be contained and didn't yet know what caused it

 Matthew Henderson, who was in the area taking photographs, said he saw the fire jump a road at one point, briefly cutting off access to part of Spring Valley until firefighters pushed it back

 More than 230 firefighters using helicopters, bulldozers and other equipment were battling the blaze

For more infomation >> California wildfire burns 12 buildings, threatens hundreds - Duration: 2:59.

-------------------------------------------

California, il bulldog Zsa Zsa eletto "il cane più brutto del mondo" - Duration: 2:29.

24 giugno 201815:18 California, il bulldog Zsa Zsa eletto "il cane più brutto del mondo" Ha vinto grazie a una lingua che deve trascinare con sé, dopo aver perso i denti che la sostenevano, e alle zampe storte

In premio, una coppa e mille dollari leggi dopo commenta Ha una lingua molto lunga e la deve trascinare con sé perché, probabilmente, non ha più denti che possano sostenerla

Non solo, ma le sue zampe anteriori sono storte. Grazie a queste caratteristiche Tsa Tsa si è aggiudicata la coppa per il cane più brutto del mondo 2018

Ogni anno a Petaluma, California, si tiene il contest canino che assegna mille dollari in premio all'esemplare più bizzarro

Quest'anno il vincitore è un bulldog del Minnesota. La competizione che vede sfilare i più improbabili tipi di migliori amici dell'uomo si tiene in California e quest'anno ha vinto un cagnolino del Minnesota

Sgraziata e con le zampe storte, ma per la sua padrona: "She is beautiful", è "bellissima"

Ora seguirà il destino dei vincitori delle edizioni precedenti: un fenomeno del web, ospitato in molte trasmissioni televisive

Nell'attesa di capire come la sua mamma umana vorrà spendere i mille dollari di premio

canebruttocontest

For more infomation >> California, il bulldog Zsa Zsa eletto "il cane più brutto del mondo" - Duration: 2:29.

-------------------------------------------

California Billboard Credits ICE With Making 'Kids Disappear' - Duration: 3:49.

 Activists in California altered a billboard on a busy highway to remind citizens what the U

S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's priorities are all about.   "We make kids disappear' - I

C.E." the billboard, changed Wednesday night, reads on Emeryville's Shellmound St, referring to the U

S. law enforcement agency by its acronym. It previously read "We Make Junk Disappear" for an ad for trash removal, CBS San Fransisco reported

 Activist group Indecline created the new piece as a response to the separation of children from their parents along the U

S.-Mexico border. It also refers to the migrant child detention centers springing up across the country

 Spokesman Heran Medhin said the billboard is an attempt to publicly condemn President Donald Trump's anti-immigration policies

 He also cited the president's "willingness to inflict immense trauma on young children and their families under his banner of xenophobia" in a statement to the Washington Post

 Thousands of children are still detained across the U.S. despite Trump's executive order signed on Wednesday that has put a halt to the separations

In just one Texas facility, nearly 1,500 children are being kept in cages. At other facilities, journalists and politicians who want to view the conditions inside have been turned away

   "I think it's a pretty powerful political statement," Medhin said. "I think ultimately we have to be concerned with children

They didn't do anything to deserve to be separated from their parents." Download BEFORE YOU GO PHOTO GALLERY Immigrant Families At The U

S.-Mexico Border Sebastian Murdock Senior Reporter, HuffPost Suggest a correction MORE: Politics And Government California U

S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement Child Ice

For more infomation >> California Billboard Credits ICE With Making 'Kids Disappear' - Duration: 3:49.

-------------------------------------------

Making a Will in California - The Law Offices of Andy I. Chen - Duration: 8:32.

Hey everybody, it's Andy and welcome again to my office in Modesto, California. I'm

an attorney licensed to practice law in California as well as New York. In this

video I am going to go over how you make a will in California. So, just to be very

clear, when I talk about wills, I'm referring to, you know, basically, the

document that people create when they get to the end of their life, when they

think they're about to pass away, and in the document, or in their will, they talk

about who they want to leave stuff to, how much to leave each person, etc. So

this video is going to go over how you generally create a document like that in

California. This is actually the second, er, sorry the first video rather, the

first video in a series of two that where I go over the validity of wills

generally. This video is going to go over how to create a will in California. The

second video which I'm going to play a little bit of actually right over here.

I'll link it down with the description for you also, but in the second video, I

go over how California law determines whether or not a will is valid or not.

So if you're watching this video, it might be worth it I think to watch this

video as well as this one, like the one that I'll link down below, to get the

full picture of how to create a will in California that, you know, is going to be

correct. So, I think, well, in general, this is true, but I think in particular it's

true for wills. Whenever you write a document like a letter, a contract, an

email or something, it's important to get it right, but the thing is at the end of

the day, you will hopefully be around to clarify whether any sort of,

you know, misunderstanding, to explain things if it weren't clear. A will is

obviously going to be very different because, you know, if you don't make your

will clear, for instance, or you don't comply with what, you know, you're

supposed to do, you know, in order to make a well valid, you will basically not be

able to fix it, you know, because you're obviously deceased. And the kind of

ramifications of that generally will be left to your heirs, your friends ,your

family, your children, etc to deal with. So a will in particular is a document that

you definitely want to get correct because if you don't, then the stuff that

you want to leave to your spouse, your children, etc. possibly might not go to

your spouse or your children. So, a will, you know, basically it's

something that you definitely want to get correct and do as much research as

you can. Hire a lawyer, etc., whatever works for you. So all of

that said then, this video is going to go over two sections of the California

Probate Code and they are going to be section 6110 as well as section 6111.

6110 is going to be the more heavily used section, I think. 6111 is much

shorter. Actually they're both short. 6110 is like that. 6111, I think

is a little bit shorter, but 6111 is not going to be used probably as

frequently I guess in my experience, but you know your experience might be

different. So, anyway, all of that said then, let's go ahead and delve into

section 6110. So 6110 has several criteria that a will has to meet in

order to be recognized as valid in California. Number one is that the will

has to be in writing. 6111 goes over handwritten wills, but,

you know, when I see in writing it could be handwritten, it could be typed, etc., but

basically it cannot be oral. An oral will is called, you know just in case you're

interested, a nuncupative will. California does not

recognize those, but other states do recognize them for whatever reason. So,

but California does not. So anyway, the first kind of criteria is that the will

in question has to be in writing. Number two is that the will has to be signed by

either the testator, the testator's conservator, or by somebody in the

testator's presence at the testator's direction. What does all that mean? So

first things first, the testator is the person who is creating the will. So the

thing is, if you're creating a will for yourself,

you're the testator. If you're helping your mom or your dad or whoever

create a will, they are the testator. So the testator is going to be the

person who is making the will. So the will, you know the writing in

question, has to be signed by the testator themselves, by the testator's

conservator if, you know the testator has been conserved, or by somebody acting

in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction. So what that last

one means basically is imagine somebody who's trying to make a will who is going

to be mentally present, like mentally they're still fine, but due to

perhaps old age or due to other kind of, you know, medical problems, they are not

physically able to pick up a pen and sign their name anymore. So what they

basically do, hopefully if they still can, is to kind of tell somebody Hey, you know

point to them, like, you know, they point to somebody said 'Hey this is my will. I need

you to sign this for me. Do it in front of me, etc.' That's what, you

know, that's what that third criteria basically means. So talking about

wills I guess is a little bit strange because you do have to account for the

fact that, you know that the person who's making the will might not be physically

able to sign their name, you know, in the way that they otherwise would. So a lot

of times, you know, when you're talking about testators, you're talking

about at the direction of a testator, acknowledgement by the testator, etc. So

anyway back to back to the criteria, number one has to be in writing and

number two has to be signed. So number three I actually get a lot of questions

about and it's actually the witness requirement. So California Probate Code

section 6110 says there has to be at least two witnesses to the signing that

also sign their names to the will. And the witnesses actually have very

specific criteria. So number one they actually have to witness either the

testator signing the will themselves or the testator acknowledging to the

witnesses that this is my signature. So again, think back to somebody who is

elderly, you know, incapable of signing their name, but if they can somehow

communicate that 'Hey, you know, this is my signature on this will' that would be

sufficient. So the witnesses have to witness the, you know, witness all this stuff

happening during the testator's life obviously,

if, you know, the testator has to sign or the testator has to acknowledge. The

last part about witnesses is that the witnesses also have to understand that

what they're signing off on is a will and it's not a permission slip for a

child, it's not a pizza delivery order. It is it will and it's significant because,

you know, it's a testator's last will and testament. So that's what 6110

basically goes over. 6111, um, it basically says that if if a will, for

whatever reason, does not meet any of the criteria that I just described, but the

will is handwritten in the testator's own handwriting, that's fine also. That's

actually called a Holographic Will and California will recognize those just

fine. Probate Code section 6112 I'm not

going to go over, but it kind of presents in a nutshell what happens if,

you know, the there's a dispute about the will, what happens if one of the

witnesses falls away because they're declared invalid for some reason. Yeah, so

6112 I'm not going to go over. If you want to, get in touch and I can, you know,

try to help you with 6112 if you like, but 6112 I'm not going to go over in

this video because problems about how to argue and stuff those are very, very

specific. I can't, you know, tell the camera right now how you should

do your own particular situation. So anyway, yeah, I guess hopefully all of

that makes sense. The second video where I cover validity of wills, that's

actually Probate Code section 6113. That one's actually not

terribly complicated. That last criteria, I think, is going to be kind of a mouthful to

describe, but hopefully, you know, I got I got it out, I guess. We'll see. So anyway,

but in terms of how to make a will, Probate Code section 6110 and

California Probate Code section 6111. Yeah so, anyway, I'm going to link both of

those down in the description for you so go ahead and take a look at that and go

ahead and comment, share, like, subscribe, you know, all that kind of social mediay

stuff and I will talk to you guys next time.

Thanks

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét