Auto news on Youtube Jun 18 2018

Hi everyone, it's Justine.

Recently, I did a video saying that bridal fashion actually reflects the taste of the

decade it's designed in.

And some people commented "Well this dress is hideous.

It was never pretty", or "That dress is timeless".

But I think that people's taste really varies over time.

It's human, and we get influenced by what's happening around us.

To prove my point, today I will put fashion into perspective, and show you what's trendy

now, versus 20 years ago versus 40 years ago…

So 2018 versus 1998, and 1978.

It's a fun video, but most importantly, if you think... if you're guessing that

the contrast is pretty strong, you're right.

2018…

For each brand that I'm going to show you, I've tried to pick three photos that best

represent the brand's collection and aesthetic in that year.

In 2018, Chanel is decently covering the legs in tweed with applied pockets on the jackets.

The traditional version is a tweed with several colors, like black and white and grey on the

left.

A variation of it has contrasted trimming on the edges.

The modern version is mostly black, with just hints of shimmer.

Overall, classic Chanel and formal.

This same year, Dior is mixing formal and casual by combining a tailored plaid skirt

with a loose slogan sweater.

There is a more formal version, but then it's styled with a rock-and-roll T-shirt and leather

boots.

Going in the other direction, Dior also ventures into sheer designs where the underwear is

visible, but that's less wearable.

Now let's look at Italy.

Prada is all about solid neon colors superposed to create a clashing color palette.

If there is a print, then 5.

And they don't match, because Prada always plays with what is considered "good taste"

and "bad taste".

That's a recurring theme in her work.

There is also a more… let's say, wearable style, with a classic plaid – but then with

quite rounded shoulders and cropped, wide sleeves.

But where is the thrill coming from in 2018?

Which are the brands that are hyped as hell?

Vetements is the champion of layering XXL layers to create a very tall and wide silhouette

with broad, broad shoulders: potentially unisex, definitely wild in the combination of textures

and colors.

An oversize trench coat, denim jacket or clothes that seem too big for you are typical of the

brand.

The other rising star this year would be Off White.

They are exploring contrasts, like half snake, half matrix.

Half romantic, half amazon.

Half biker, half lady going out.

It's a mix of eras, genres, styles and silhouettes.

But what they are hyped for most is the logo branding on their accessories: you can have

a leather purse with a flower pattern, aesthetically very pretty, and then an industrial yellow

strap with the brand name written all over it.

In 2018, in the end, street style bumps into all other aesthetics.

What brands or what style best represents this decade, in your opinion?

1998…

The nineties are known to be quite grungy but also minimal.

The nineties weren't quite sure what they wanted to be known for.

I think that decade mostly went down as a reset decade after the extravaganza of the

spotlight-lit eighties.

Chanel was about houndstooth jacquards, camelias, pearls and tweed, because these were symbols

of Coco Chanel and the head designer Karl Lagerfeld had been very loyal to the symbols

of the house, forever.

Dior was under the direction of John Galliano and displayed what Western Europeans think

of when you say "Asia", "Orient Express", "Shanghai 1900s".

Very much in contrast with what people were actually wearing on the streets…

Can you believe how different Dior in 2018 and 1998 were?

That's why hiring a new head designer for a fashion house is always a very tough decision.

Same thing for Prada, except that it was already the designer who still leads the house today.

In 1998, Prada was very tuned down in colors, with some prints and patterns, but mostly

quite safe, and normal compared to now.

Which designers made a splash in the nineties?

If I had to choose only two, they would have to be Calvin Klein and Helmut Lang.

Calvin Klein left a mark as "the" designer of the nineties, and the one who stands for

minimalism.

Tailored looks that are also comfortable, fluid silhouettes, and in his case, a quite

monochromatic style.

Simple-looking designs that fall impeccably, but not easy at all in terms of construction.

Helmut Lang got a little bit forgotten but in the nineties, he was huge.

His aesthetic was also quite neutral.

If one element in an outfit had a pattern or a special texture, then the rest would

typically be smooth, white and crisp.

I am not a huge fan of grunge or punk styles, but there is also that clean, simple, minimal

side of the nineties, which I think has influenced our taste today a lot more than we think.

1978…

Going further back in time, it gets a bit hard to find photos on the internet to show

you guys, but I did what I could.

In the seventies, the fashion industry was a different world compared to today.

It was still dominated by haute couture, fashion shows were dedicated to customers, and not

to the press or to bloggers.

Chanel was post-Coco and pre-Karl-Lagerfeld.

Quite old school, and the house was in fact not doing very well creatively.

The style was very classic.

But check out the front row, the ladies all look the same: same hair, same outfits.

It's interesting to see this.

In previous decades, there was always "THE" look.

If this was the look of this season, then everyone would wear it.

It's not the case anymore, and I think that that behavior ended precisely in the seventies.

Dior was playing the "young lady", slightly frivolous, less formal than Chanel, by intention.

In the seventies, Diane von Fürstenberg, a newcomer, designed the famous wrap dress.

It's not necessarily innovative in the shape… but definitely in the fabric.

It's knitted on a machine meant to knit tights.

She just used bigger yarns and the result is a dress without its own shape, so it takes

on the shape of your body and reveals it!

That was quite modern and liberated.

I also found this photo of one of her designs from 1978.

The lady actually looks eighties to me, which means that the designer was truly ahead of

her time.

"THE" designer of the seventies, though, must be Yves Saint Laurent.

He put the women in suits, with quite manly silhouettes, looking at it from today's

perspective.

He found inspiration in other countries, like Spain or Morocco.

His aesthetics ranged from theatre-dramatic to day-to-day playful, like this butterfly

dress.

When you look at fashion from previous decades, there's rarely anything that you could wear

today that would just easily blend in.

But in their decades, all those pieces have been considered "normal" or "modern"

or "cool", all meant in a positive way.

Is there anything in this video that you would wear today, and which decade is your favorite

fashion decade?

If you enjoyed this video, thumbs up!

Thank you very much!

And if you're interested in fashion, this channel is all dedicated to fashion, so don't

forget to subscribe before you move on to the next video.

If you missed the video on bridal fashion, by the way, just in case, I will link it here

in the corner, and down below in the description for you.

I'll see you very soon with the next one, and until then, take care.

Bye!

For more infomation >> Fashion of 2018 vs. 1998 vs. 1978 ǀ That was trendy?? ǀ Justine Leconte - Duration: 8:07.

-------------------------------------------

What if oh!MYPINK was real? (OH MY GIRL X BLACKPINK) - Duration: 5:54.

For more infomation >> What if oh!MYPINK was real? (OH MY GIRL X BLACKPINK) - Duration: 5:54.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Arrested One Of Obama's Leakers And What She Said Was Mind Blowing - Duration: 12:16.

Trump Arrested One Of Obama's Leakers And What She Said Was Mind Blowing

The Trump administration began enforcing the law against leaking classified information

by arresting federal government contractor Reality Leigh Winner.

But her crime was not the most unbelievable part of the story.

Her past – and how she got a security clearance – raised eyebrows across America.

Winner was arrested for passing classified information to The Intercept about an attempted

Russian cyber attack days before the2016 election.

She was outed when The Intercept passed the document to the federal government for verification.

The feds were able to reverse the leak by seeing who had access to that information

and then they discovered Winner emailed The Intercept from her work computer.

According to the FBI affidavit, the news outlet outed its source when it provided the top

secret doc to the gov't. for confirmation.

pic.twitter.com/PowFcQ6xwc

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) June 5, 2017

When it was discovered that Winner was the leaker, reporters quickly mined her Twitter

feed and what they found was outrageous.

She regularly tweeted racist anti-white sentiments and attacked Trump in over the top language.

@kanyewest you should make a shirt that says, "being white is terrorism"

— Sara Winners (@Reezlie) February 26, 2017

#Mexico #FTW https://t.co/0iYkDudeRj

— Sara Winners (@Reezlie) January 26, 2017

the most dangerous entry to this country was the orange fascist we let into the white house

— Sara Winners (@Reezlie) February 11, 2017

Questions quickly arose as to how someone like this received a security clearance in

the first place.

How did Winner pass the Obama administration's vetting?

We will keep you up to date on any new developments

in

this story.

For more infomation >> Trump Arrested One Of Obama's Leakers And What She Said Was Mind Blowing - Duration: 12:16.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Boggy Creek Monster Was Real? - Duration: 9:26.

In the early 1970's the media had a field day about a creature known as the Boggy Creek

Monster, aka the southern sasquatch.

The Boggy Creek monster was being reported on in the news because it was accused of attacking

a local family, as well as destroying and stalking livestock.

Media coverage of the incident made the monster recognizable worldwide.

It was given its name by journalist Jim Powell, who was documenting the sightings for the

Texarkana Gazette and the Texarkana Daily News.

The story of the boggy creek monster has inspired several films and books.

For now, the boggy creek monster is just a legend, but what if it weren't?

Today, life's biggest questions ask, what if the boggy creek monster was real?

Hello and welcome back to life's biggest questions, The channel that asks the fundamental

questions of life.

Welcome back to another installment in our urban legends series.

If you enjoy this kind of content, make sure you like, subscribe and turn on notifications

and don't forget to tell us some suggestions in the comments below so we can keep bringing

you great videos just like this one.

Just a reminder to stick around until the end of the video, where we will be responding

to some of your comments.

Stay tuned.

To better understand what would happen if the boggy creek monster was real, we are going

to have to learn a little bit about it.

The popularity of the legend has somewhat fizzled out since the 70's, and you may

not have ever heard of the boggy creek monster before, so here's what you need to know.

According to witnesses, the boggy creek monster resembles a Sasquatch-like creature.

It's covered in long dark, scraggly fur.

It's estimated to be between 7 and 10 feet tall and to weight 250 to 300 pounds.

The creature has a huge chest that's 3 feet wide.

Later reports from the 1980s claimed that the creature was much bigger, at least 10

feet tall, with an estimated weight of 800 pounds.

Reports and footprints claim that the beast may only have 3 toes, and it seems to be nocturnal.

And despite what horror films and books might suggest about it, the boggy creek monster

seems to be an animal that roams in solitude, with little reason to lash out or kill humans.

Unless you provoke it, of course.

In terms of the way it moves around, occasionally it has been seen galloping and swinging its

arms, much like a monkey.

Others say they have seen it running.

Some witnesses have reported that the boggy creek monster, frankly, doesn't smell the

greatest.

It smells like a combination between a wet dog and a skunk.

And for good reason.

The boggy creek monster roams around an area that is notoriously swampy.

The region is essentially acre upon acre of unexplored habitat.

Very few people live around there, because of the difficult and boggy terrain.

The town of Fouke only had about 500 inhabitants in the 1970s, and only around 1 thousand in

the outlying areas.

The Boggy Creek monster is also known as the Fouke monster, because it's been seen many

times near Fouke, Arkansas.

Fouke Arkansas is in south-west Arkansas in Miller County, which is right on the border

of Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana.

The legend of the boggy creek monster, or the beast of the boggy creek, states that

it haunts an area of Arkansas from the sulfur river bottoms to the small town of Fouke.

Over many years, countless witnesses have come forward to report sightings of the creature,

as well as sightings of footprints, especially in and around Fouke.

For this reason, the beast of the boggy creek has become somewhat of a tourist attraction

and it's Fouke Arkansas's most well-known inhabitant.

Recorded sightings began in 1971, but local sightings are believed to have gone back more

than a century.

Whispers about a large hairy ape-man stalking the south were heard among the locals as far

back as 1856, but sightings were often mocked and brushed off as nonsense.

There were also sightings from the 1940s that were recorded in the area of Jonesville.

At the time, the creature was known as the Jonesville monster.

These sightings were not reported to authorities or news outlets.

Essentially, reports linked to the boggy creek monster have been around since the area had

human inhabitants.

Then once the 1970s hit, A couple who had just moved to Fouke, bobby, and Elizabeth

Ford, told the media that a creature attacked their new home late at night on may 2nd 1971.

Elizabeth told the media that she thought she heard some sort of animal moving around

outside in the nights prior.

Then on the night of May 2nd, a hand reached through a screen window while Elizabeth was

sleeping on a couch.

Her husband and brother Don then chased it away and fired several shots at it, but after

the encounter, they suffered from mild shock.

Apparently, Bobby was attacked by the creature and was subsequently went to the hospital

to be treated for injuries and shock.

That was when bobby's doctor notified the local media, who went to the ford house.

No traces of blood were found, but 3 toed footprints were found near the house, and

there were scratches and damage to the porch.

After the initial sighting and media frenzy, the little rock Arkansas radio station KAAY

posted a $1,900 bounty on the creature, so attempts were made to track it down and catch

it.

The local police got involved because locals were scared and concerned.

They answered every call that could have led them to the boggy creek monster.

Still, Dogs were unable to follow its scent, and the monster was never captured.

Then, about 3 weeks later that month, on May 23, 1971, 3 people said that they saw an ape-like

creature walking across Highway 71.

This time, the creature was spotted by people well known in the community, rather than the

fords who had just moved to Fouke.

A few days later on June 3rd, there was another sighting and then another later in June, when

3 toed Footprints were also found in a soybean field.

Most sightings were made by locals as well as tourists who had traveled to Arkansas to

find the monster.

Respected citizens have reported seeing the boggy creek monster even up until modern day.

Most recently, in November 2017 a truck driver traveling south of Fouke saw a large hairy

animal moving around upright on two legs in a section of forest that was clearcut.

Earlier that year, a man and wife, driving by boggy creek saw a tall, human-like figure

standing by the treeline.

Noting that it could not have been human, the wife shouted 'what is that'? but her

husband could not look back fast enough to see the monster.

So what are the chances that the boggy creek monster actually exists?

Well, there have been track and claw marks discovered that are believed to belong to

the boggy creek monster.

There was a set of footprints discovered where foot that made them had to be 17 inches long

and 7 inches wide.

That being said, following the initial FORD sighting, DR frank Eschenbach of southern

Arkansas university said that there was a 99 percent chance the tracks were a hoax.

He said that the prints could not have belonged to a species of ape, because the creature

had 3 toes.

All primates have 5 toes.

Furthermore, the region where the sightings took place has no history of nighttime primates.

There were a substantial amount of fake sightings reported; each time the person was fined 59

dollars.

Unless the boggy creek monster is a species of animal we know nothing about, it's probably

not real.

But hang on just a second, this video is not about whether or not the boggy creek monster

its real, it's about what would happen if it were real.

Let's explore.

If the boggy creek monster was real, all the inhabitants of Arkansas and the surrounding

areas would equip themselves with everything they needed to scare away, or potentially

kill the monster.

Every property would be lined with huge, electric or barbed wire fences.

Farming and livestock fields would be closed off, as the boggy creek monster is known to

hunt livestock and attack local dogs.

If there really were an elusive sasquatch-like creature roaming around Arkansas, there would

no doubt be attempts to track it down and capture it.

Scientists would want to capture it for the sake of study.

The discovery of a previously unheard of species of primate would be groundbreaking.

Many questions would need answers.

Like how did the boggy creek monster come to live in the southern united states?

What does it eat?

Can it communicate and also are there any others like it?

It could legitimize other legends about sasquatch-like creatures like Bigfoot and the abominable

snowman.

If the beast of boggy creek really existed, does that mean the other giant ape-like urban

legends is too?

At the same time though, hunters would travel from across the world to try and kill the

boggy creek monster and have it stuffed.

All of this media coverage would spark reality shows surrounding the beast of the boggy creek.

The media frenzy and terrorized locals would catch the attention of the US government.

Unlike the 1970s, technology has advanced substantially.

It would be simple for the US government to send an army with heat sensors to try to track

down the boggy creek monster.

Once the creature was captured, activist would protest and demand its release.

The boggy creek monster had never hurt anyone deliberately, after all, it only seemed to

attack livestock and occasionally dogs, and when it attacked bobby ford it was being shot

at.

But its unlikely the government would listen.

The beast of the boggy creek would be locked up, away from the public eye, so it could

be poked at and studied, and maybe even cloned.

The boggy creek monster has inspired several films, most notably the 1972 indie horror

hit, The legend of the boggy creek, grossing 20 million dollars the US at the box office.

What do you think would happen if the boggy creek monster was real?

Let us know in the comment section.

For now its that fun part of the video where I'm going to respond to some of your comments.

JozeiikSounds – Do a vid on the zodiac killer.

– I do believe we have a video on the zodiac killer coming up later this month stay tuned.

Floating fireworks – these comments about to be lit.

So lit right now.

Tigertacklers – when did people stop believing in the old gods, such as Thor, Zeus hades

etc.

Well, you're actually taking about Greco Roman polytheism.

Polytheism is the belief in more than one god.

But I believe polytheism began to decline during the rise of Christianity, and this

of course happened in the first few centuries ad.

Shukur Shukuur – what if lbq became the biggest youtube channel.

I wouldn't mind that.

Then pewdiepie would finally know who I am.

The Unfamiliar – Why is god called he and not she?

That is a very good question.

Perhaps one of life's biggest questions.

There have been civilizations who followed female gods, as well as civilizations that

believed men and women were equal.

Not slaves though.

Apparently, he is referred to in masculine terms because that is the way God has chosen

to reveal himself to us.

A famous Christian scholar has suggested that our understanding of gender is minuscule and

that we are all feminine in relation to god.

But you know what, that's a really good idea, maybe I'll suggest it as a topic on

this channel.

Jonathan Symes – I like it when Charlotte narrates these videos.

Aw hey, thanks.

Yukari Yakumo -will there be video games in heaven.

I assume there is pretty much anything you could want in heaven.

But who cares about video games when you can mess with mortals.

Wiv Suhail – This channel is really great, I think you should make a video about Noah's

ark.

Glad you like our videos, but we actually have made a video about Noah's ark.

You can check that out by clicking the link on the screen right now.

For more infomation >> What If The Boggy Creek Monster Was Real? - Duration: 9:26.

-------------------------------------------

What Is Intersectionality? - Duration: 4:16.

You probably think your opinions matter.

You probably think you're an individual with unique experiences, thoughts and ambitions.

Well, I hate to break it to you, but according to current leftist orthodoxy, you're wrong.

You see, your opinion only matters relative to your identity—and where that identity

ranks on the hierarchy of intersectionality.

If you're now thinking, "What the hell are you talking about?" you haven't spent

much time on a modern college campus.

Intersectionality is a form of identity politics in which the value of your opinion depends

on how many victim groups you belong to.

At the bottom of the totem pole is the person everybody loves to hate—the straight, white male.

And who's at the top?

Well, it's very hard to say, because new groups claim victim status all the time.

No one can keep track.

So, how does this intersectionality thing play out?

Something like this:

Let's say you're a gay, white woman.

Your opinion matters, but less than that of a gay, black woman.

Why?

Because while all women are oppressed by the patriarchy, and all gays are oppressed by

the heterosexual majority, blacks have a victim status that whites obviously don't.

Of course, a gay black woman's victim status is less than that of a black trans woman,

who ranks below a black, Muslim trans woman, and so on.

The more memberships you can claim in "oppressed" groups, the more aggrieved you are,

and the higher you rank.

Get it?

Good, because it's about to get even more complicated.

Intersectionality takes your victim status and uses it as the basis for creating alliances

with other victim groups.

Thirty or forty years ago, activists encouraged racial solidarity among blacks to combat oppression.

But today, that's not enough.

Today's activists demand blacks make common cause with other allegedly "oppressed" people

—gays, lesbians, transgenders, Palestinians, Native Americans, whomever.

Here's the logic:

A black gay and a Hispanic gay may not belong to the same victim group racially, but they

do belong to the same victim group on the basis of their sexuality.

By focusing on the places where various victim identities intersect, intersectionality creates

a united "us" versus "them" paradigm: righteous victims rising up together to fight

the oppressor, those dreaded straight, white men.

This explains why at a rally protesting the treatment of Palestinians by Israel,

you might see a contingent of lesbian activists.

That's intersectionality at work.

They're so united by their victim status that it doesn't matter if Islamists throw

gays off of buildings or murder female family members who defy their father's wishes.

Victim solidarity trumps all other considerations.

The term "intersectionality" was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, a professor of law

at Columbia University.

She explains that intersectionality "was my attempt to make feminism, anti-racist activism,

and anti-discrimination law do what I thought they should—highlight the multiple avenues

through which racial and gender oppression were experienced…"

To Crenshaw, America is a terrible place full of victim groups, each with their

particular set of grievances.

Why shouldn't these victim groups get together and form a political coalition unified by

the belief that the majority society has harmed them?

That some professor tucked away in an ivory tower would come up with this nonsense

is not surprising.

What is surprising—and disturbing—is that so many people actually go along with it.

America is the most open, least racist nation on the planet.

That professor Crenshaw is free to spin her nonsensical theories and get paid well for it

should offer adequate proof of that.

And since when do you have to live someone's experience in order to understand them?

You don't have to live as a slave in order to understand that slavery is cruel and wrong.

You don't have to live as a woman in order to recognize the evil of rape.

Finally, and most important, intersectionality promotes the biggest hoax of all: that we

aren't individuals who are to be judged on the basis of how we act, but are merely

members of groups to be judged on the basis of our group identity.

In other words, you and I as individuals with our unique experiences, thoughts and ambitions

count for nothing; our racial and sexual identity count for everything.

It's hard to imagine an idea less likely to produce a free and equal America than that.

But what do I know?

I'm just a straight, white male.

I'm Ben Shapiro for Prager University.

For more infomation >> What Is Intersectionality? - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

People CAN'T Stop Talking About What's RIGHT Next To Obama's New Home, Is It A Sign? - Duration: 2:01.

For more infomation >> People CAN'T Stop Talking About What's RIGHT Next To Obama's New Home, Is It A Sign? - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

Tyron Woodley reveals what really happened during sparring session with Colby Covington - Duration: 5:25.

Football News24/7  UFC welterweight champion Tyron Woodley and interim division champ Colby Covington have had a bitter rivalry for the past several months

 Covington defeated former UFC lightweight champion Rafael dos Anjos in the co-main event of UFC 225 on pay-per-view (PPV) to capture the interim 170-pound title

He will ultimately challenge Woodley to unify their titles at some point down the road

 Woodley expressed interested in having that fight at UFC 227 in Los Angeles this August

Covington seems more interested in getting some more promotion time to have the fight this November from Madison Square Garden

 For the past several months, Covington has been relentless in his trash talk towards Woodley

He even went as far as making some interesting claims about what happened between them in the American Top Team training room

What Really Happened  Covington claims that he dominated Woodley in sparring and made him quit in the third round of a five round scheduled session

 Woodley has a different account of how that session went down. He recently joined The MMA Hour to talk about Covington and what happened between them at ATT

 Here's what he had to say (quotes via MMA Fighting):  "I talked to (coach) Din (Thomas), I said, 'Din, you know what? I'm going to take him down, and watch how he reacts

' And I tortured him for the whole practice," Woodley said.  "He ran off the mat basically crying, storming off, and I have people who are willing to come forth and testify to the training camp

 "Tell me one person that's going to testify that Colby whooped my ass in practice

Tell me one person that's going to lie under oath and let God above hear them say he beat me in anything

 "He ain't ever beat me at thumb wrestling.  "Not only has he never taken me down, he's never won a millisecond of a round," Woodley added

"I can't even imagine when he's won an exchange of combinations.  "He ran from me the entire training camp

He went home early, saying that his toe was hurting.  "And when it was time to really wrestle, he had my striking partner … in there with a broken wrist wrestling me, while Colby was sitting in the weight room acting like he didn't know what was going on

 "So the fact that he would even bring that up, I'm going to whoop his ass so bad

I've never wanted to hurt somebody in my life. I've never wanted to beat somebody up so bad

"  What are your thoughts on Woodley's account of what happened when he and Covington sparred at the gym? Let us know your thoughts on the matter in the comments section below!  Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE: https://www

givemesport.com/writeforgms

For more infomation >> Tyron Woodley reveals what really happened during sparring session with Colby Covington - Duration: 5:25.

-------------------------------------------

People CAN'T Stop Talking About What's RIGHT Next To Obama's New Home, Is It A Sign? - Duration: 2:02.

We've learned where the Obamas will be living now that they have booted out of the White

House and people can't stop talking about what was discovered literally a short walk

away from it.

Ever since he announced his run for presidency, Barack Obama has claimed to be a Christian,

but his actions since have caused people to question otherwise, especially since he seems

to have an unhealthy obsession with Muslims.

Couple that with the fact that his alleged "church" of 20 years didn't exactly

teach that we should all love our neighbors, and you have the perfect storm for conspiracy

theorists.

Well the latest news about where his family is going to be living is definitely sure to

throw some fuel on the conspiracy fire after people learn there's a mosque within 1,000

feet of his new residence, and it's not just any mosque either.

Western Journalism has more:

While details about the size and layout of the home have been made public, the Daily

Caller points out what hasn't been publicized is the fact the Islamic Center of Washington,

one of the largest mosques in the Western Hemisphere, is located a mere 1,069 feet from

the residence.

The website for the center states it "provides Qur'an and Islamic Literature and distribution

of such publications that would create awareness and knowledge of Islamic Truth."

The center also assists needy families as well as providing counseling.

Facilities are also available for weddings and organizing language courses.

The Oman embassy and former embassy of Iran are close to the new Obama residence.

Sasha Obama's school is also only a 10-minute drive from the new home.

Okay, so maybe living near a mosque isn't the worst thing in the world, but it is quite

the coincidence, don't you think?

With the way he's defended Islam over the past few years, it's definitely going to

be raising some eyebrows with those convinced that he's been a closet Muslim all this

time, that's for sure.

Obama trashed America.

Thank God he's gone.