Chủ Nhật, 17 tháng 6, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Jun 17 2018

Trump Arrested One Of Obama's Leakers And What She Said Was Mind Blowing

The Trump administration began enforcing the law against leaking classified information

by arresting federal government contractor Reality Leigh Winner.

But her crime was not the most unbelievable part of the story.

Her past – and how she got a security clearance – raised eyebrows across America.

Winner was arrested for passing classified information to The Intercept about an attempted

Russian cyber attack days before the2016 election.

She was outed when The Intercept passed the document to the federal government for verification.

The feds were able to reverse the leak by seeing who had access to that information

and then they discovered Winner emailed The Intercept from her work computer.

According to the FBI affidavit, the news outlet outed its source when it provided the top

secret doc to the gov't. for confirmation.

pic.twitter.com/PowFcQ6xwc

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) June 5, 2017

When it was discovered that Winner was the leaker, reporters quickly mined her Twitter

feed and what they found was outrageous.

She regularly tweeted racist anti-white sentiments and attacked Trump in over the top language.

@kanyewest you should make a shirt that says, "being white is terrorism"

— Sara Winners (@Reezlie) February 26, 2017

#Mexico #FTW https://t.co/0iYkDudeRj

— Sara Winners (@Reezlie) January 26, 2017

the most dangerous entry to this country was the orange fascist we let into the white house

— Sara Winners (@Reezlie) February 11, 2017

Questions quickly arose as to how someone like this received a security clearance in

the first place.

How did Winner pass the Obama administration's vetting?

We will keep you up to date on any new developments

in

this story.

For more infomation >> Trump Arrested One Of Obama's Leakers And What She Said Was Mind Blowing - Duration: 12:16.

-------------------------------------------

Fashion of 2018 vs. 1998 vs. 1978 ǀ That was trendy?? ǀ Justine Leconte - Duration: 8:07.

Hi everyone, it's Justine.

Recently, I did a video saying that bridal fashion actually reflects the taste of the

decade it's designed in.

And some people commented "Well this dress is hideous.

It was never pretty", or "That dress is timeless".

But I think that people's taste really varies over time.

It's human, and we get influenced by what's happening around us.

To prove my point, today I will put fashion into perspective, and show you what's trendy

now, versus 20 years ago versus 40 years ago…

So 2018 versus 1998, and 1978.

It's a fun video, but most importantly, if you think... if you're guessing that

the contrast is pretty strong, you're right.

2018…

For each brand that I'm going to show you, I've tried to pick three photos that best

represent the brand's collection and aesthetic in that year.

In 2018, Chanel is decently covering the legs in tweed with applied pockets on the jackets.

The traditional version is a tweed with several colors, like black and white and grey on the

left.

A variation of it has contrasted trimming on the edges.

The modern version is mostly black, with just hints of shimmer.

Overall, classic Chanel and formal.

This same year, Dior is mixing formal and casual by combining a tailored plaid skirt

with a loose slogan sweater.

There is a more formal version, but then it's styled with a rock-and-roll T-shirt and leather

boots.

Going in the other direction, Dior also ventures into sheer designs where the underwear is

visible, but that's less wearable.

Now let's look at Italy.

Prada is all about solid neon colors superposed to create a clashing color palette.

If there is a print, then 5.

And they don't match, because Prada always plays with what is considered "good taste"

and "bad taste".

That's a recurring theme in her work.

There is also a more… let's say, wearable style, with a classic plaid – but then with

quite rounded shoulders and cropped, wide sleeves.

But where is the thrill coming from in 2018?

Which are the brands that are hyped as hell?

Vetements is the champion of layering XXL layers to create a very tall and wide silhouette

with broad, broad shoulders: potentially unisex, definitely wild in the combination of textures

and colors.

An oversize trench coat, denim jacket or clothes that seem too big for you are typical of the

brand.

The other rising star this year would be Off White.

They are exploring contrasts, like half snake, half matrix.

Half romantic, half amazon.

Half biker, half lady going out.

It's a mix of eras, genres, styles and silhouettes.

But what they are hyped for most is the logo branding on their accessories: you can have

a leather purse with a flower pattern, aesthetically very pretty, and then an industrial yellow

strap with the brand name written all over it.

In 2018, in the end, street style bumps into all other aesthetics.

What brands or what style best represents this decade, in your opinion?

1998…

The nineties are known to be quite grungy but also minimal.

The nineties weren't quite sure what they wanted to be known for.

I think that decade mostly went down as a reset decade after the extravaganza of the

spotlight-lit eighties.

Chanel was about houndstooth jacquards, camelias, pearls and tweed, because these were symbols

of Coco Chanel and the head designer Karl Lagerfeld had been very loyal to the symbols

of the house, forever.

Dior was under the direction of John Galliano and displayed what Western Europeans think

of when you say "Asia", "Orient Express", "Shanghai 1900s".

Very much in contrast with what people were actually wearing on the streets…

Can you believe how different Dior in 2018 and 1998 were?

That's why hiring a new head designer for a fashion house is always a very tough decision.

Same thing for Prada, except that it was already the designer who still leads the house today.

In 1998, Prada was very tuned down in colors, with some prints and patterns, but mostly

quite safe, and normal compared to now.

Which designers made a splash in the nineties?

If I had to choose only two, they would have to be Calvin Klein and Helmut Lang.

Calvin Klein left a mark as "the" designer of the nineties, and the one who stands for

minimalism.

Tailored looks that are also comfortable, fluid silhouettes, and in his case, a quite

monochromatic style.

Simple-looking designs that fall impeccably, but not easy at all in terms of construction.

Helmut Lang got a little bit forgotten but in the nineties, he was huge.

His aesthetic was also quite neutral.

If one element in an outfit had a pattern or a special texture, then the rest would

typically be smooth, white and crisp.

I am not a huge fan of grunge or punk styles, but there is also that clean, simple, minimal

side of the nineties, which I think has influenced our taste today a lot more than we think.

1978…

Going further back in time, it gets a bit hard to find photos on the internet to show

you guys, but I did what I could.

In the seventies, the fashion industry was a different world compared to today.

It was still dominated by haute couture, fashion shows were dedicated to customers, and not

to the press or to bloggers.

Chanel was post-Coco and pre-Karl-Lagerfeld.

Quite old school, and the house was in fact not doing very well creatively.

The style was very classic.

But check out the front row, the ladies all look the same: same hair, same outfits.

It's interesting to see this.

In previous decades, there was always "THE" look.

If this was the look of this season, then everyone would wear it.

It's not the case anymore, and I think that that behavior ended precisely in the seventies.

Dior was playing the "young lady", slightly frivolous, less formal than Chanel, by intention.

In the seventies, Diane von Fürstenberg, a newcomer, designed the famous wrap dress.

It's not necessarily innovative in the shape… but definitely in the fabric.

It's knitted on a machine meant to knit tights.

She just used bigger yarns and the result is a dress without its own shape, so it takes

on the shape of your body and reveals it!

That was quite modern and liberated.

I also found this photo of one of her designs from 1978.

The lady actually looks eighties to me, which means that the designer was truly ahead of

her time.

"THE" designer of the seventies, though, must be Yves Saint Laurent.

He put the women in suits, with quite manly silhouettes, looking at it from today's

perspective.

He found inspiration in other countries, like Spain or Morocco.

His aesthetics ranged from theatre-dramatic to day-to-day playful, like this butterfly

dress.

When you look at fashion from previous decades, there's rarely anything that you could wear

today that would just easily blend in.

But in their decades, all those pieces have been considered "normal" or "modern"

or "cool", all meant in a positive way.

Is there anything in this video that you would wear today, and which decade is your favorite

fashion decade?

If you enjoyed this video, thumbs up!

Thank you very much!

And if you're interested in fashion, this channel is all dedicated to fashion, so don't

forget to subscribe before you move on to the next video.

If you missed the video on bridal fashion, by the way, just in case, I will link it here

in the corner, and down below in the description for you.

I'll see you very soon with the next one, and until then, take care.

Bye!

For more infomation >> Fashion of 2018 vs. 1998 vs. 1978 ǀ That was trendy?? ǀ Justine Leconte - Duration: 8:07.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Boggy Creek Monster Was Real? - Duration: 9:26.

In the early 1970's the media had a field day about a creature known as the Boggy Creek

Monster, aka the southern sasquatch.

The Boggy Creek monster was being reported on in the news because it was accused of attacking

a local family, as well as destroying and stalking livestock.

Media coverage of the incident made the monster recognizable worldwide.

It was given its name by journalist Jim Powell, who was documenting the sightings for the

Texarkana Gazette and the Texarkana Daily News.

The story of the boggy creek monster has inspired several films and books.

For now, the boggy creek monster is just a legend, but what if it weren't?

Today, life's biggest questions ask, what if the boggy creek monster was real?

Hello and welcome back to life's biggest questions, The channel that asks the fundamental

questions of life.

Welcome back to another installment in our urban legends series.

If you enjoy this kind of content, make sure you like, subscribe and turn on notifications

and don't forget to tell us some suggestions in the comments below so we can keep bringing

you great videos just like this one.

Just a reminder to stick around until the end of the video, where we will be responding

to some of your comments.

Stay tuned.

To better understand what would happen if the boggy creek monster was real, we are going

to have to learn a little bit about it.

The popularity of the legend has somewhat fizzled out since the 70's, and you may

not have ever heard of the boggy creek monster before, so here's what you need to know.

According to witnesses, the boggy creek monster resembles a Sasquatch-like creature.

It's covered in long dark, scraggly fur.

It's estimated to be between 7 and 10 feet tall and to weight 250 to 300 pounds.

The creature has a huge chest that's 3 feet wide.

Later reports from the 1980s claimed that the creature was much bigger, at least 10

feet tall, with an estimated weight of 800 pounds.

Reports and footprints claim that the beast may only have 3 toes, and it seems to be nocturnal.

And despite what horror films and books might suggest about it, the boggy creek monster

seems to be an animal that roams in solitude, with little reason to lash out or kill humans.

Unless you provoke it, of course.

In terms of the way it moves around, occasionally it has been seen galloping and swinging its

arms, much like a monkey.

Others say they have seen it running.

Some witnesses have reported that the boggy creek monster, frankly, doesn't smell the

greatest.

It smells like a combination between a wet dog and a skunk.

And for good reason.

The boggy creek monster roams around an area that is notoriously swampy.

The region is essentially acre upon acre of unexplored habitat.

Very few people live around there, because of the difficult and boggy terrain.

The town of Fouke only had about 500 inhabitants in the 1970s, and only around 1 thousand in

the outlying areas.

The Boggy Creek monster is also known as the Fouke monster, because it's been seen many

times near Fouke, Arkansas.

Fouke Arkansas is in south-west Arkansas in Miller County, which is right on the border

of Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana.

The legend of the boggy creek monster, or the beast of the boggy creek, states that

it haunts an area of Arkansas from the sulfur river bottoms to the small town of Fouke.

Over many years, countless witnesses have come forward to report sightings of the creature,

as well as sightings of footprints, especially in and around Fouke.

For this reason, the beast of the boggy creek has become somewhat of a tourist attraction

and it's Fouke Arkansas's most well-known inhabitant.

Recorded sightings began in 1971, but local sightings are believed to have gone back more

than a century.

Whispers about a large hairy ape-man stalking the south were heard among the locals as far

back as 1856, but sightings were often mocked and brushed off as nonsense.

There were also sightings from the 1940s that were recorded in the area of Jonesville.

At the time, the creature was known as the Jonesville monster.

These sightings were not reported to authorities or news outlets.

Essentially, reports linked to the boggy creek monster have been around since the area had

human inhabitants.

Then once the 1970s hit, A couple who had just moved to Fouke, bobby, and Elizabeth

Ford, told the media that a creature attacked their new home late at night on may 2nd 1971.

Elizabeth told the media that she thought she heard some sort of animal moving around

outside in the nights prior.

Then on the night of May 2nd, a hand reached through a screen window while Elizabeth was

sleeping on a couch.

Her husband and brother Don then chased it away and fired several shots at it, but after

the encounter, they suffered from mild shock.

Apparently, Bobby was attacked by the creature and was subsequently went to the hospital

to be treated for injuries and shock.

That was when bobby's doctor notified the local media, who went to the ford house.

No traces of blood were found, but 3 toed footprints were found near the house, and

there were scratches and damage to the porch.

After the initial sighting and media frenzy, the little rock Arkansas radio station KAAY

posted a $1,900 bounty on the creature, so attempts were made to track it down and catch

it.

The local police got involved because locals were scared and concerned.

They answered every call that could have led them to the boggy creek monster.

Still, Dogs were unable to follow its scent, and the monster was never captured.

Then, about 3 weeks later that month, on May 23, 1971, 3 people said that they saw an ape-like

creature walking across Highway 71.

This time, the creature was spotted by people well known in the community, rather than the

fords who had just moved to Fouke.

A few days later on June 3rd, there was another sighting and then another later in June, when

3 toed Footprints were also found in a soybean field.

Most sightings were made by locals as well as tourists who had traveled to Arkansas to

find the monster.

Respected citizens have reported seeing the boggy creek monster even up until modern day.

Most recently, in November 2017 a truck driver traveling south of Fouke saw a large hairy

animal moving around upright on two legs in a section of forest that was clearcut.

Earlier that year, a man and wife, driving by boggy creek saw a tall, human-like figure

standing by the treeline.

Noting that it could not have been human, the wife shouted 'what is that'? but her

husband could not look back fast enough to see the monster.

So what are the chances that the boggy creek monster actually exists?

Well, there have been track and claw marks discovered that are believed to belong to

the boggy creek monster.

There was a set of footprints discovered where foot that made them had to be 17 inches long

and 7 inches wide.

That being said, following the initial FORD sighting, DR frank Eschenbach of southern

Arkansas university said that there was a 99 percent chance the tracks were a hoax.

He said that the prints could not have belonged to a species of ape, because the creature

had 3 toes.

All primates have 5 toes.

Furthermore, the region where the sightings took place has no history of nighttime primates.

There were a substantial amount of fake sightings reported; each time the person was fined 59

dollars.

Unless the boggy creek monster is a species of animal we know nothing about, it's probably

not real.

But hang on just a second, this video is not about whether or not the boggy creek monster

its real, it's about what would happen if it were real.

Let's explore.

If the boggy creek monster was real, all the inhabitants of Arkansas and the surrounding

areas would equip themselves with everything they needed to scare away, or potentially

kill the monster.

Every property would be lined with huge, electric or barbed wire fences.

Farming and livestock fields would be closed off, as the boggy creek monster is known to

hunt livestock and attack local dogs.

If there really were an elusive sasquatch-like creature roaming around Arkansas, there would

no doubt be attempts to track it down and capture it.

Scientists would want to capture it for the sake of study.

The discovery of a previously unheard of species of primate would be groundbreaking.

Many questions would need answers.

Like how did the boggy creek monster come to live in the southern united states?

What does it eat?

Can it communicate and also are there any others like it?

It could legitimize other legends about sasquatch-like creatures like Bigfoot and the abominable

snowman.

If the beast of boggy creek really existed, does that mean the other giant ape-like urban

legends is too?

At the same time though, hunters would travel from across the world to try and kill the

boggy creek monster and have it stuffed.

All of this media coverage would spark reality shows surrounding the beast of the boggy creek.

The media frenzy and terrorized locals would catch the attention of the US government.

Unlike the 1970s, technology has advanced substantially.

It would be simple for the US government to send an army with heat sensors to try to track

down the boggy creek monster.

Once the creature was captured, activist would protest and demand its release.

The boggy creek monster had never hurt anyone deliberately, after all, it only seemed to

attack livestock and occasionally dogs, and when it attacked bobby ford it was being shot

at.

But its unlikely the government would listen.

The beast of the boggy creek would be locked up, away from the public eye, so it could

be poked at and studied, and maybe even cloned.

The boggy creek monster has inspired several films, most notably the 1972 indie horror

hit, The legend of the boggy creek, grossing 20 million dollars the US at the box office.

What do you think would happen if the boggy creek monster was real?

Let us know in the comment section.

For now its that fun part of the video where I'm going to respond to some of your comments.

JozeiikSounds – Do a vid on the zodiac killer.

– I do believe we have a video on the zodiac killer coming up later this month stay tuned.

Floating fireworks – these comments about to be lit.

So lit right now.

Tigertacklers – when did people stop believing in the old gods, such as Thor, Zeus hades

etc.

Well, you're actually taking about Greco Roman polytheism.

Polytheism is the belief in more than one god.

But I believe polytheism began to decline during the rise of Christianity, and this

of course happened in the first few centuries ad.

Shukur Shukuur – what if lbq became the biggest youtube channel.

I wouldn't mind that.

Then pewdiepie would finally know who I am.

The Unfamiliar – Why is god called he and not she?

That is a very good question.

Perhaps one of life's biggest questions.

There have been civilizations who followed female gods, as well as civilizations that

believed men and women were equal.

Not slaves though.

Apparently, he is referred to in masculine terms because that is the way God has chosen

to reveal himself to us.

A famous Christian scholar has suggested that our understanding of gender is minuscule and

that we are all feminine in relation to god.

But you know what, that's a really good idea, maybe I'll suggest it as a topic on

this channel.

Jonathan Symes – I like it when Charlotte narrates these videos.

Aw hey, thanks.

Yukari Yakumo -will there be video games in heaven.

I assume there is pretty much anything you could want in heaven.

But who cares about video games when you can mess with mortals.

Wiv Suhail – This channel is really great, I think you should make a video about Noah's

ark.

Glad you like our videos, but we actually have made a video about Noah's ark.

You can check that out by clicking the link on the screen right now.

For more infomation >> What If The Boggy Creek Monster Was Real? - Duration: 9:26.

-------------------------------------------

What if oh!MYPINK was real? (OH MY GIRL X BLACKPINK) - Duration: 5:54.

For more infomation >> What if oh!MYPINK was real? (OH MY GIRL X BLACKPINK) - Duration: 5:54.

-------------------------------------------

Barack Obama Was Furious When He Saw What Jeff Sessions Had Up His Sleeve - Duration: 11:54.

Barack Obama Was Furious When He Saw What Jeff Sessions Had Up His Sleeve

While Attorney General Jeff Sessions has come under fire for his recusal in the Russia investigation,

one thing is certainly clear.

Sessions has committed to undoing Barack Obama's disastrous open borders policies.

And Obama was furious when he found out exactly what Sessions had up his sleeve.

In 2014, Obama loosened the rules on illegal aliens seeking asylum.

The administration allowed women greater leeway to claim fears of domestic and gang violence

as the basis for asylum.

In 2014, the nation's top immigration court ruled that a woman from Guatemala was eligible

for asylum based on the Obama administration altering the requirements.

Sessions stated this led to the number of aliens claiming persecution rocketing from

5,000 in 2009 to 94,000 in 2016.

This was part of the Obama strategy.

The administration's goal was to flood America with as many illegal aliens as possible in

order to create a crisis that would force Congress to pass amnesty.

These revisions to the asylum laws, as well as the illegal executive amnesty DACA memo

that allowed illegal aliens who allegedly came here as children to apply for work permits,

were undertaken with one specific purpose in mind.

Obama took these unilateral moves to create an illegal immigration crisis after the Republican

controlled House refused to take up the Gang of 8 amnesty legislation that the Democrat-run

Senate passed in 2013.

Whatever one thinks of Sessions performance in the Russia investigation, the Attorney

General has been loyal to President Trump's America First Immigration agenda.

To that end, Sessions reset America's asylum policy to the pre-2014 standards.

The Attorney General wrote in his memo:

"An alien may suffer threats and violence in a foreign country for any number of reasons

relating to her social, economic, family, or other personal circumstances.

Yet the asylum statute does not provide redress for all misfortune.

It applies when persecution arises on account of membership in a protected group and the

victim may not find protection except by taking refuge in another country."

Sessions continued on explaining how the Obama-era decision contributed to the flood of illegal

aliens into America:

"Powerful incentives were created for aliens to come here illegally and claim a fear of

return.

In effect, word spread that by asserting this fear, they could remain in the United States

one way or the other.

Far too often, that rumor proved to be true.

The results are just what one would expect.

The number of illegal entrants has surged.

Credible fear claims have skyrocketed, and the percentage of asylum claims found meritorious

by our judges declined."

Liberals howled in outrage.

Karen Musalo, a defense lawyer for the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies at the University

of California Hastings College of the Law told the New York Times, "What this decision

does is yank us all back to the Dark Ages of human rights and women's human rights

and the conceptualization of it."

But all Sessions ruling did was take America back to the pre-2014 standard for granting

asylum.

Do you agree with Jeff Sessions decision?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Barack Obama Was Furious When He Saw What Jeff Sessions Had Up His Sleeve - Duration: 11:54.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Is In Deep Trouble When Trump Finds Out About What He Was Hiding - Duration: 13:05.

Robert Mueller Is In Deep Trouble When Trump Finds Out About What He Was Hiding

Robert Mueller's witch hunt against President Trump just suffered another body blow.

And this one could be the knockout punch.

That's because Mueller and his team are in deep trouble once Trump finds out what

they are hiding.

Not even Robert Mueller and his team's investigation was safe from the fallout from Inspector General

Michael Horowitz's bombshell report.

The political bias and hatred of Trump even spread to Mueller's team.

And it is calling into question the legitimacy of his entire investigation.

In Horowitz's report, investigators identified a November 22nd 2016 exchange between two

FBI lawyers – one of whom worked on the Clinton investigation and was later assigned

to Mueller's team.

The lawyer was responding to another FBI attorney's horror at Donald Trump's victory and praised

the "resistance."

Horowitz's report states :

"FBI Attorney 2 sent an instant message to FBI Attorney 1 commenting on the amount

of money the subject of an FBI investigation had been paid while working on the Trump campaign.

FBI Attorney 1 responded, "Is it making you rethink your commitment to the Trump administration?"

FBI Attorney 2 replied, "Hell no." and then added, "Viva le resistance."

FBI Attorney 1 responded that Trump was "going to eliminate all of our pensions in order

to pay for people like" the person discussed in the instant message exchange, and FBI Attorney

1 and FBI Attorney 2 then began a discussion of federal pension and retirement issues."

The lawyer was later removed from Mueller's team, but the damage had already been done.

Mueller clearly did not vet the members of his team.

Some critics contend that Mueller did not want to examine the backgrounds of the lawyers

he hired so he could get away with stacking the deck against Trump.

Mueller removed the members of his team only after they were caught red-handed—and he

should receive no credibility points for taking an obvious action that was forced upon him

by outside actors.

This explosive development led Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani to appear on Sean Hannity's

Fox News program and declare that Mueller's investigation should be suspended:

"I believe that Rod Rosenstein and Jeff Sessions have a chance to redeem themselves

and that chance comes about tomorrow and doesn't go beyond tomorrow.

Tomorrow Mueller should be suspended and honest people should be brought in" to investigate

whether the Justice Department and/or FBI tried to interfere in the 2016 presidential

election."

Some Trump watchers predicted the President was on the verge of a major action.

The Daily Mail's David Martosko wrote,"If Trump doesn't fire anyone at DOJ in the

next 12 hours, he probably never will.

The fact that he hasn't yet tweeted about the IG report suggests to me that some sort

of calculated action is being contemplated."

Do you believe Trump should start firing disloyal employees in the DOJ and that Mueller should

shut down

his investigation?

Let

us

know

your

thoughts in

the

comment section.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller Is In Deep Trouble When Trump Finds Out About What He Was Hiding - Duration: 13:05.

-------------------------------------------

People CAN'T Stop Talking About What's RIGHT Next To Obama's New Home, Is It A Sign? - Duration: 2:01.

For more infomation >> People CAN'T Stop Talking About What's RIGHT Next To Obama's New Home, Is It A Sign? - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

People CAN'T Stop Talking About What's RIGHT Next To Obama's New Home, Is It A Sign? - Duration: 2:02.

We've learned where the Obamas will be living now that they have booted out of the White

House and people can't stop talking about what was discovered literally a short walk

away from it.

Ever since he announced his run for presidency, Barack Obama has claimed to be a Christian,

but his actions since have caused people to question otherwise, especially since he seems

to have an unhealthy obsession with Muslims.

Couple that with the fact that his alleged "church" of 20 years didn't exactly

teach that we should all love our neighbors, and you have the perfect storm for conspiracy

theorists.

Well the latest news about where his family is going to be living is definitely sure to

throw some fuel on the conspiracy fire after people learn there's a mosque within 1,000

feet of his new residence, and it's not just any mosque either.

Western Journalism has more:

While details about the size and layout of the home have been made public, the Daily

Caller points out what hasn't been publicized is the fact the Islamic Center of Washington,

one of the largest mosques in the Western Hemisphere, is located a mere 1,069 feet from

the residence.

The website for the center states it "provides Qur'an and Islamic Literature and distribution

of such publications that would create awareness and knowledge of Islamic Truth."

The center also assists needy families as well as providing counseling.

Facilities are also available for weddings and organizing language courses.

The Oman embassy and former embassy of Iran are close to the new Obama residence.

Sasha Obama's school is also only a 10-minute drive from the new home.

Okay, so maybe living near a mosque isn't the worst thing in the world, but it is quite

the coincidence, don't you think?

With the way he's defended Islam over the past few years, it's definitely going to

be raising some eyebrows with those convinced that he's been a closet Muslim all this

time, that's for sure.

Obama trashed America.

Thank God he's gone.

For more infomation >> People CAN'T Stop Talking About What's RIGHT Next To Obama's New Home, Is It A Sign? - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone. - Duration: 4:05.

  The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone

 Sajid Javid, who is in charge of the nation's policing and security, said he was targeted by criminals outside Euston station in north London

 The incident happened during his previous role as Communities Secretary, he told The Sun

Facebook Twitter  "It happened in a flash. I was walking out of Euston station and reached for my phone to call a taxi," the minister said

 "It was brand new. Before I knew what was happening, it had gone. They just rode up, grabbed it and zoomed off

 "I was angry and upset but thought myself lucky not to have been stabbed or beaten up like many other victims who fall prey to these vicious criminals

"  Mr Javid spoke about the incident after Michael McIntyre was robbed of his watch by moped-riding thieves in a violent incident

 The comedian was on the school run in his Range Rover in north London when thugs smashed the windows before stealing the Rolex

 The incident came amid concerns of a wave of violent crime in some parts of the country, particularly in London and other big cities

 Mr Javid, who has four children, admitted he worries about them if they are out late and his parental concern drives him to tackle the problem

 "Our streets should be safe at all times, you shouldn't have to worry about things like knife or other crime," he said

 Theresa May has acknowledged concerns about moped gangs, but insisted police were being given the powers they need to crack down on crime

 Earlier this month the Prime Minister was challenged about the vernment's response to criminals using mopeds to carry out robberies and other crimes

 She said former home secretary Amber Rudd held talks with police to make sure they had the powers they needed to be able to chase moped-riding criminals

 "This issue of moped crime is one that is of concern for people," the PM said.

For more infomation >> The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone. - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

I was evicted, raped and left penniless: Universal Credit failed its claimants - Duration: 8:05.

 It's been nearly two years since I claimed Universal Credit. I had the misfortune of living in a trial area, where the benefit was tested before it was rolled out to the rest of the UK

   As I watched my life get destroyed, was evicted and left penniless under the 'flagship welfare reform programme', I prayed that I was one of few feeling the true horrors that such a scheme can inflict on people

People are being 'left in real hardship' because of botched Universal Credit rollout But, yesterday's report from the National Audit Office (NAO) clearly shows that I was not the only one suffering

 As more people were moved to Universal Credit, I watched news reports of people freezing to death in homes they couldn't afford to heat and spoke to people who had faced rent arrears and threats of eviction due to delays in payments and errors with processing claims

 I found it hard to believe when MPs stood up in the House of Commons and spoke of how there were only a small number of issues with Universal Credit and that these were being tackled

I questioned how they could be so blind to the pain people were dealing with.  Were they honestly not aware of what was happening?  Did they not want to look at the damage being caused?  Did it seem like too much effort to roll back the scheme?  All I know is that we finally have an official report detailing Universal Credit's failures

 'The Government's introduction of Universal Credit has been one long catalogue of delay with huge impact on people's lives,' said MP Meg Hillier, chair of the public accounts committee, in an official statement

 This single sentence speaks volumes to those who have experienced the neglect that Universal Credit deals its claimants

 Although it has been 23 months, it feels like yesterday that I listened in disbelief and horror as an advisor told me that, months after I'd filed a claim for Universal Credit, my application had been rejected because their system didn't have my current address on file – despite the fact I'd provided it

 I remember the numb pain I felt in the pit of my stomach as I opened my bedroom door to my landlord and he told me that he was going to evict me, because I wasn't able to pay my rent

 I remember the fear and shame I felt every time I had to climb over a ticket barrier on the London Underground because my Oyster didn't have enough money on it

 I remember counting 20p coins to buy a loaf of bread, then rationing it out for weeks and picking mould off the slices because I couldn't afford to buy anything more

 I remember sleeping on a mattress blackened with filth in a stranger's bedsit, because I had nowhere else to go after my landlord finally kicked me out

 I remember the horror that spiked in my stomach whenever this stranger, my rapist, unlocked the door and thumped a box of condoms down on the counter, because I knew what was coming

 I remember preparing myself for the pain of being forced into sex against my will

 I remember stealing food so I wouldn't starve, and part of me was hoping I'd be caught and sent to jail, because at least then I wouldn't have to worry about food, money, staying warm, and being raped

 When I first started writing about Universal Credit, I was tweeted stories from people who had endured similar levels of pain

 'Stealing to survive is a reality', one of them said. 'Solidarity,' I replied, as did others

 It became the word we used to express our shared understanding of what we were going through

 We were ordinary, hard-working people who had fallen into unlucky circumstances, and been kicked when we were already down

 Our common interest was to survive under a scheme that felt as if it was designed to make our lives more difficult, and to support those who reached out for help

 Because we knew that Universal Credit would not help us.  The people who did were complete strangers, those who provided me with the tools I needed to get my life back on track; a home, toiletries, food and someone to talk to

 I only got these resources after I'd suffered at the hands of a government resource that claims to provide support to those who need it

 The hardest reality I had to face as a Universal Credit claimant was being dealt the response that the system was working correctly and that, in fact, I wasn't working hard enough

 The 40 job applications a week that I was putting in, the numerous interviews I was being rejected from for simply not being the right fit at the right time, it was all my fault, because I wasn't working hard enough

 As a whole, we felt we were somehow to blame for the circumstances that had led to our unemployment, and it was our fault if we were neglected by Universal Credit

 We felt too scared to call out the system for f***ing us up, for fear it'd f*** us up more and take away the meager allowance dribbled out to us when they felt like it

 What spoke to me most was when Hillier said 'DWP needs to wake up and understand what is going so wrong before future claimants share a similar fate

'  This is what I had hoped for, as I was starving, homeless and penniless after being abused by Universal Credit

 Will the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) actually wake up and admit they could be the ones at fault after this report, or will it be dismissed, with countless more lives to be destroyed?      

For more infomation >> I was evicted, raped and left penniless: Universal Credit failed its claimants - Duration: 8:05.

-------------------------------------------

Sajid Javid reveals his phone was stolen by moped muggers - Duration: 4:05.

 The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone

 Sajid Javid, who is in charge of the nation's policing and security, said he was targeted by criminals outside Euston station in north London

 The incident happened during his previous role as Communities Secretary, he told The Sun

 "It happened in a flash. I was walking out of Euston station and reached for my phone to call a taxi," the minister said

 "It was brand new. Before I knew what was happening, it had gone. They just rode up, grabbed it and zoomed off

 "I was angry and upset but thought myself lucky not to have been stabbed or beaten up like many other victims who fall prey to these vicious criminals

" Why aren't police doing more to tackle violent moped muggings?  Mr Javid spoke about the incident after Michael McIntyre was robbed of his watch by moped-riding thieves in a violent incident

 The comedian was on the school run in his Range Rover in north London when thugs smashed the windows before stealing the Rolex

 The incident came amid concerns of a wave of violent crime in some parts of the country, particularly in London and other big cities

 Mr Javid, who has four children, admitted he worries about them if they are out late and his parental concern drives him to tackle the problem

 "Our streets should be safe at all times, you shouldn't have to worry about things like knife or other crime," he said

There's a weapon police could deploy against violent crime - but they're not using it  Theresa May has acknowledged concerns about moped gangs, but insisted police were being given the powers they need to crack down on crime

 Earlier this month the Prime Minister was challenged about the Government's response to criminals using mopeds to carry out robberies and other crimes

 She said former home secretary Amber Rudd held talks with police to make sure they had the powers they needed to be able to chase moped-riding criminals

 "This issue of moped crime is one that is of concern for people," the PM said.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét