Chủ Nhật, 17 tháng 6, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Jun 17 2018

On Friday, Paul Manafort and his legal team was taken by surprise when the judge in his

case decided to jail him over suspected witness tampering as presented by special counsel

Robert Mueller's team.

Manafort is currently on trial for foreign lobbying charges, which were handed down by

Mueller as a result of his Witch Hunt into President Trump's campaign.

And although Manafort's recent trial related to him being jailed has nothing to do with

Russian collusion, Judicial Watch's Tom Fitton recently came out and shined light

on what he thinks this is really all about in the end.

Video Below

Fitton appeared on Judge Jeanine Pirro's program on Friday, and gave his take on Paul

Manafort's mess that he is now caught up in.

Being the watchdog that Fitton is, he smells something funky with Mueller's antics related

to his collusion investigation.

Fitton strongly believes the moves being made recently come out of nothing other than desperation

and retaliation.

Fitton said: "This is retaliation by the Mueller team for Manafort pushing back against

his authority."

Fitton continued and said he thinks "this is overkill.

And I think the Mueller operation recognizes Manafort is its reason for being.

There really is no Mueller investigation to speak of substantively, without this big Manafort

indictment."

Fitton said that Mueller knows that if his Manafort investigation is shut down, the rest

"flitters away" because they have nothing on Trump.

And Fitton feels what is going on with Manafort is really a distraction from the recent IG

report that shows Mueller's investigation was tainted by FBI agents who strongly opposed

Trump.

For more infomation >> Tom Fitton Pulls Open The Curtains & Reveals What Manafort's Arrest Is Really All About - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

Tom Fitton Pulls Open The Curtains & Reveals What Manafort's Arrest Is Really All About - Duration: 1:41.

For more infomation >> Tom Fitton Pulls Open The Curtains & Reveals What Manafort's Arrest Is Really All About - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Fashion of 2018 vs. 1998 vs. 1978 ǀ That was trendy?? ǀ Justine Leconte - Duration: 8:07.

Hi everyone, it's Justine.

Recently, I did a video saying that bridal fashion actually reflects the taste of the

decade it's designed in.

And some people commented "Well this dress is hideous.

It was never pretty", or "That dress is timeless".

But I think that people's taste really varies over time.

It's human, and we get influenced by what's happening around us.

To prove my point, today I will put fashion into perspective, and show you what's trendy

now, versus 20 years ago versus 40 years ago…

So 2018 versus 1998, and 1978.

It's a fun video, but most importantly, if you think... if you're guessing that

the contrast is pretty strong, you're right.

2018…

For each brand that I'm going to show you, I've tried to pick three photos that best

represent the brand's collection and aesthetic in that year.

In 2018, Chanel is decently covering the legs in tweed with applied pockets on the jackets.

The traditional version is a tweed with several colors, like black and white and grey on the

left.

A variation of it has contrasted trimming on the edges.

The modern version is mostly black, with just hints of shimmer.

Overall, classic Chanel and formal.

This same year, Dior is mixing formal and casual by combining a tailored plaid skirt

with a loose slogan sweater.

There is a more formal version, but then it's styled with a rock-and-roll T-shirt and leather

boots.

Going in the other direction, Dior also ventures into sheer designs where the underwear is

visible, but that's less wearable.

Now let's look at Italy.

Prada is all about solid neon colors superposed to create a clashing color palette.

If there is a print, then 5.

And they don't match, because Prada always plays with what is considered "good taste"

and "bad taste".

That's a recurring theme in her work.

There is also a more… let's say, wearable style, with a classic plaid – but then with

quite rounded shoulders and cropped, wide sleeves.

But where is the thrill coming from in 2018?

Which are the brands that are hyped as hell?

Vetements is the champion of layering XXL layers to create a very tall and wide silhouette

with broad, broad shoulders: potentially unisex, definitely wild in the combination of textures

and colors.

An oversize trench coat, denim jacket or clothes that seem too big for you are typical of the

brand.

The other rising star this year would be Off White.

They are exploring contrasts, like half snake, half matrix.

Half romantic, half amazon.

Half biker, half lady going out.

It's a mix of eras, genres, styles and silhouettes.

But what they are hyped for most is the logo branding on their accessories: you can have

a leather purse with a flower pattern, aesthetically very pretty, and then an industrial yellow

strap with the brand name written all over it.

In 2018, in the end, street style bumps into all other aesthetics.

What brands or what style best represents this decade, in your opinion?

1998…

The nineties are known to be quite grungy but also minimal.

The nineties weren't quite sure what they wanted to be known for.

I think that decade mostly went down as a reset decade after the extravaganza of the

spotlight-lit eighties.

Chanel was about houndstooth jacquards, camelias, pearls and tweed, because these were symbols

of Coco Chanel and the head designer Karl Lagerfeld had been very loyal to the symbols

of the house, forever.

Dior was under the direction of John Galliano and displayed what Western Europeans think

of when you say "Asia", "Orient Express", "Shanghai 1900s".

Very much in contrast with what people were actually wearing on the streets…

Can you believe how different Dior in 2018 and 1998 were?

That's why hiring a new head designer for a fashion house is always a very tough decision.

Same thing for Prada, except that it was already the designer who still leads the house today.

In 1998, Prada was very tuned down in colors, with some prints and patterns, but mostly

quite safe, and normal compared to now.

Which designers made a splash in the nineties?

If I had to choose only two, they would have to be Calvin Klein and Helmut Lang.

Calvin Klein left a mark as "the" designer of the nineties, and the one who stands for

minimalism.

Tailored looks that are also comfortable, fluid silhouettes, and in his case, a quite

monochromatic style.

Simple-looking designs that fall impeccably, but not easy at all in terms of construction.

Helmut Lang got a little bit forgotten but in the nineties, he was huge.

His aesthetic was also quite neutral.

If one element in an outfit had a pattern or a special texture, then the rest would

typically be smooth, white and crisp.

I am not a huge fan of grunge or punk styles, but there is also that clean, simple, minimal

side of the nineties, which I think has influenced our taste today a lot more than we think.

1978…

Going further back in time, it gets a bit hard to find photos on the internet to show

you guys, but I did what I could.

In the seventies, the fashion industry was a different world compared to today.

It was still dominated by haute couture, fashion shows were dedicated to customers, and not

to the press or to bloggers.

Chanel was post-Coco and pre-Karl-Lagerfeld.

Quite old school, and the house was in fact not doing very well creatively.

The style was very classic.

But check out the front row, the ladies all look the same: same hair, same outfits.

It's interesting to see this.

In previous decades, there was always "THE" look.

If this was the look of this season, then everyone would wear it.

It's not the case anymore, and I think that that behavior ended precisely in the seventies.

Dior was playing the "young lady", slightly frivolous, less formal than Chanel, by intention.

In the seventies, Diane von Fürstenberg, a newcomer, designed the famous wrap dress.

It's not necessarily innovative in the shape… but definitely in the fabric.

It's knitted on a machine meant to knit tights.

She just used bigger yarns and the result is a dress without its own shape, so it takes

on the shape of your body and reveals it!

That was quite modern and liberated.

I also found this photo of one of her designs from 1978.

The lady actually looks eighties to me, which means that the designer was truly ahead of

her time.

"THE" designer of the seventies, though, must be Yves Saint Laurent.

He put the women in suits, with quite manly silhouettes, looking at it from today's

perspective.

He found inspiration in other countries, like Spain or Morocco.

His aesthetics ranged from theatre-dramatic to day-to-day playful, like this butterfly

dress.

When you look at fashion from previous decades, there's rarely anything that you could wear

today that would just easily blend in.

But in their decades, all those pieces have been considered "normal" or "modern"

or "cool", all meant in a positive way.

Is there anything in this video that you would wear today, and which decade is your favorite

fashion decade?

If you enjoyed this video, thumbs up!

Thank you very much!

And if you're interested in fashion, this channel is all dedicated to fashion, so don't

forget to subscribe before you move on to the next video.

If you missed the video on bridal fashion, by the way, just in case, I will link it here

in the corner, and down below in the description for you.

I'll see you very soon with the next one, and until then, take care.

Bye!

For more infomation >> Fashion of 2018 vs. 1998 vs. 1978 ǀ That was trendy?? ǀ Justine Leconte - Duration: 8:07.

-------------------------------------------

What is knowledge? Does human knowledge have a limit? - Duration: 7:30.

For more infomation >> What is knowledge? Does human knowledge have a limit? - Duration: 7:30.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Is In Deep Trouble When Trump Finds Out About What He Was Hiding - Duration: 13:05.

Robert Mueller Is In Deep Trouble When Trump Finds Out About What He Was Hiding

Robert Mueller's witch hunt against President Trump just suffered another body blow.

And this one could be the knockout punch.

That's because Mueller and his team are in deep trouble once Trump finds out what

they are hiding.

Not even Robert Mueller and his team's investigation was safe from the fallout from Inspector General

Michael Horowitz's bombshell report.

The political bias and hatred of Trump even spread to Mueller's team.

And it is calling into question the legitimacy of his entire investigation.

In Horowitz's report, investigators identified a November 22nd 2016 exchange between two

FBI lawyers – one of whom worked on the Clinton investigation and was later assigned

to Mueller's team.

The lawyer was responding to another FBI attorney's horror at Donald Trump's victory and praised

the "resistance."

Horowitz's report states :

"FBI Attorney 2 sent an instant message to FBI Attorney 1 commenting on the amount

of money the subject of an FBI investigation had been paid while working on the Trump campaign.

FBI Attorney 1 responded, "Is it making you rethink your commitment to the Trump administration?"

FBI Attorney 2 replied, "Hell no." and then added, "Viva le resistance."

FBI Attorney 1 responded that Trump was "going to eliminate all of our pensions in order

to pay for people like" the person discussed in the instant message exchange, and FBI Attorney

1 and FBI Attorney 2 then began a discussion of federal pension and retirement issues."

The lawyer was later removed from Mueller's team, but the damage had already been done.

Mueller clearly did not vet the members of his team.

Some critics contend that Mueller did not want to examine the backgrounds of the lawyers

he hired so he could get away with stacking the deck against Trump.

Mueller removed the members of his team only after they were caught red-handed—and he

should receive no credibility points for taking an obvious action that was forced upon him

by outside actors.

This explosive development led Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani to appear on Sean Hannity's

Fox News program and declare that Mueller's investigation should be suspended:

"I believe that Rod Rosenstein and Jeff Sessions have a chance to redeem themselves

and that chance comes about tomorrow and doesn't go beyond tomorrow.

Tomorrow Mueller should be suspended and honest people should be brought in" to investigate

whether the Justice Department and/or FBI tried to interfere in the 2016 presidential

election."

Some Trump watchers predicted the President was on the verge of a major action.

The Daily Mail's David Martosko wrote,"If Trump doesn't fire anyone at DOJ in the

next 12 hours, he probably never will.

The fact that he hasn't yet tweeted about the IG report suggests to me that some sort

of calculated action is being contemplated."

Do you believe Trump should start firing disloyal employees in the DOJ and that Mueller should

shut down

his investigation?

Let

us

know

your

thoughts in

the

comment section.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller Is In Deep Trouble When Trump Finds Out About What He Was Hiding - Duration: 13:05.

-------------------------------------------

Barack Obama Was Furious When He Saw What Jeff Sessions Had Up His Sleeve - Duration: 11:54.

Barack Obama Was Furious When He Saw What Jeff Sessions Had Up His Sleeve

While Attorney General Jeff Sessions has come under fire for his recusal in the Russia investigation,

one thing is certainly clear.

Sessions has committed to undoing Barack Obama's disastrous open borders policies.

And Obama was furious when he found out exactly what Sessions had up his sleeve.

In 2014, Obama loosened the rules on illegal aliens seeking asylum.

The administration allowed women greater leeway to claim fears of domestic and gang violence

as the basis for asylum.

In 2014, the nation's top immigration court ruled that a woman from Guatemala was eligible

for asylum based on the Obama administration altering the requirements.

Sessions stated this led to the number of aliens claiming persecution rocketing from

5,000 in 2009 to 94,000 in 2016.

This was part of the Obama strategy.

The administration's goal was to flood America with as many illegal aliens as possible in

order to create a crisis that would force Congress to pass amnesty.

These revisions to the asylum laws, as well as the illegal executive amnesty DACA memo

that allowed illegal aliens who allegedly came here as children to apply for work permits,

were undertaken with one specific purpose in mind.

Obama took these unilateral moves to create an illegal immigration crisis after the Republican

controlled House refused to take up the Gang of 8 amnesty legislation that the Democrat-run

Senate passed in 2013.

Whatever one thinks of Sessions performance in the Russia investigation, the Attorney

General has been loyal to President Trump's America First Immigration agenda.

To that end, Sessions reset America's asylum policy to the pre-2014 standards.

The Attorney General wrote in his memo:

"An alien may suffer threats and violence in a foreign country for any number of reasons

relating to her social, economic, family, or other personal circumstances.

Yet the asylum statute does not provide redress for all misfortune.

It applies when persecution arises on account of membership in a protected group and the

victim may not find protection except by taking refuge in another country."

Sessions continued on explaining how the Obama-era decision contributed to the flood of illegal

aliens into America:

"Powerful incentives were created for aliens to come here illegally and claim a fear of

return.

In effect, word spread that by asserting this fear, they could remain in the United States

one way or the other.

Far too often, that rumor proved to be true.

The results are just what one would expect.

The number of illegal entrants has surged.

Credible fear claims have skyrocketed, and the percentage of asylum claims found meritorious

by our judges declined."

Liberals howled in outrage.

Karen Musalo, a defense lawyer for the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies at the University

of California Hastings College of the Law told the New York Times, "What this decision

does is yank us all back to the Dark Ages of human rights and women's human rights

and the conceptualization of it."

But all Sessions ruling did was take America back to the pre-2014 standard for granting

asylum.

Do you agree with Jeff Sessions decision?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Barack Obama Was Furious When He Saw What Jeff Sessions Had Up His Sleeve - Duration: 11:54.

-------------------------------------------

What If Trump Tower Was Attacked? - Duration: 5:08.

Built in 1983, Trump Tower is an iconic New York Landmark on the fifth avenue.

Of course beyond that, it is Trump Organization HQ and the original family home of the pres

and his wife, Melania.

But what if it was at the center of a malicious plot?

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions - I am your host Rebecca Felgate

and today we are asking – What If Trump Tower Was Attacked?

Before we launch into this video – I just want to ask you guys to leave me a comment

letting me know what you think would happen if the Trump tower was attacked?

Also, make sure you have clicked on that notification bell so you don't miss an episode of Life's

Biggest questions.

The Trump tower is located on Fifth Avenue between 56th and 57th and is a multi-use skyscraper,

the 64th tallest building in New York City.

The building contains condominiums, including the Trump family penthouse, which Donald,

Melania, and Baron lived in until 2017.

It is the headquarters of the Trump Organisation, is a popular shopping spot, containing retailers

such as coach, Nike, and Gucci and also houses a number of restaurants, including the Trump

Grill.

Day by day, there are thousands of people in the building, which has its atrium open

until 5pm.

Depending on what time of day the building was attacked, would depend on how many people

would be affected.

In 2017, the New York City Police Commissioner James O'Neill said: Trump Tower itself now

presents a target to those who wish to commit acts of terror against our country, further

straining our limited counterterrorism resources."

He is right, although it comes at a cost, The Trump Tower is one of the most secure

buildings in New York, especially since Donald Trump has become the president.

Since his inauguration in 2017, the Trump tower has been under government security protection.

When trump is in residence, this protection costs 308 thousand dollars a day, when he

isn't it costs 4.5 million a year to secure the building.

Any would-be attacker would have their work cut out for them.

When we think of an attack on a New York Sky Scraper, we can't help but think of 9/11,

one of the worst terror attacks in history.

When the planes flew into the towers, it culminated in the deaths of over 3 thousand people.

These days an attack like that simply could not be replicated – for one New York City

is a class B controlled airspace and there is a no-fly zone over Trump Tower.

Trump tower is like the press has boasted, built well.

It is a reasonably safe place to be.

Even if an arsonist decided to try and light a fire to attack the tower…they probably

wouldn't get too far.

A fire broke out in one of the trump tower condos earlier this year, killing one man

and injuring 6 firefighters.

That isn't great, however, the fact that the fire didn't spread is miraculous.

Apparently, the tower is pretty super fireproof, meaning even if an attack fire was lit, it

probably wouldn't do much.

Okay, so a person couldn't fly a plane into it, or start a fire in it?

Could they sneak a bomb in?

Well, recently there was a bomb threat at the Chicago Trump tower, although that was

not really in the end.

The New York tower, like I say is secure, although perhaps an explosive device could

be snuck in, however it would not likely cause any significant damage to the tower, although

could harm civilians.

As could an active shooter.

If Trump tower was attacked, I imagine the situation would be brought under control very

quickly and the perpetrators captured.

However for safe measure, the area around the building would be closed off and the buildings

surrounding evacuated, causing disruption in the city.

Any attack against trump would make newspaper headlines and twitter would be alight with

gossip.

But really, this is probably all an attack would be; headlines.

There is almost zero chance of an attacker being able to harm the 45th President of the

united states, the person I presume they want to hurt.

One, he now lives at the Whitehouse, and two, his security detail is so heavily on it.

Honestly if the Whitehouse was attacked, it would be a cry for attention and nothing more

– and if people got hurt in that cry, well that would be awful, but beyond localized

tragedy, it wouldn't have any real impact on the city or trumps presidency, other than

causing further tension in an already tense time – when instead people should be focusing

on constructive resolutions.

So, what do you guys think?

What would happen if Trump Tower was attacked?

DO you think it could happen?

Am I being way too optimistic?

For more infomation >> What If Trump Tower Was Attacked? - Duration: 5:08.

-------------------------------------------

Officials Tell Business Not To Put Up Flags, What Outraged Residents Did Instead Has Them Regretting - Duration: 4:49.

For more infomation >> Officials Tell Business Not To Put Up Flags, What Outraged Residents Did Instead Has Them Regretting - Duration: 4:49.

-------------------------------------------

Officials Tell Business Not To Put Up Flags, What Outraged Residents Did Instead Has Them Regretting - Duration: 4:50.

The town of Chelmsford, Massachusetts found themselves in the middle of a big controversy

over Memorial Day weekend.

What was meant to be a meaningful flag display to honor our veterans turned into government

bureaucracy at its finest.

Jon Crandall who works at Laer Realty in Chelmsford lined up 200 some odd flags along the business

property to honor all those who served, and when the city attempted to shut down the display,

the people of Chelmsford came in full force to support them.

The Daily Wire reported,

"Back in the beginning of June, a realty company in Chelmsford, a small town in the

liberal state of Massachusetts, lined up some 200 flags along its office's property to

celebrate America's veterans on Memorial Day.

The town's officials decided that that was a violation of a bylaw that forbids using

flags for "commercial promotion."

"This is a commercial establishment located at a busy intersection.

It was in the front lawn of that particular property, and in the opinion of our code enforcement

officer, the building commissioner, it was a violation," said Michael McCall, Chelmsford's

assistant town manager.

The town ordered the real estate company to take down some flags, but the company actually

added flags to the display after the story hit the newspapers and airwaves.

Then this happened.

"That story prompted a public outcry.

Supporters added more flags to the display, bringing the total to 700," CBS-Boston reported.

"'People have come out of the woodwork to plant them, and they're telling us their

personal stories,' said Crandall."

The outcry "was enough to make the Town Manager have a change of heart.

The flags are now allowed, after all," CBS reported.

"The intent wasn't to be anti-patriotic or anti-American, but clearly there's a

tremendous love of this country demonstrated with the American flag, and I think we're

all better for it in the end," Town Manager Paul Cohen said.

"He plans to propose a change in the bylaw at the next town meeting this fall, so no

one else will ever have to fight this fight again.""

Boston CBS reported,

""On Saturday we came out and we lined this with 200 flags in support of our deceased

veterans and all the people who have served," says Jon Crandall who works at Laer Realty

in Chelmsford.

He's talking about small American flags planted in front of that business for Memorial

Day.

When he went to work Friday, there was a surprise.

"There was a note in the door from the building department stating we had a violation, a flag

violation, excessive flags," he says.

The problem?

There's a town bylaw that says you can't use flags for "commercial promotion."

"This is a commercial establishment located at a busy intersection.

It was in the front lawn of that particular property, and in the opinion of our code enforcement

officer, the building commissioner, it was a violation," says Michael McCall Chelmsford's

Assistant Town Manager.

The town wants the real estate company to take down some of the flags and leave up only

what they call "a reasonable amount," but hasn't said how many that is.

"We feel this is a patriotic act.

It's not about our business.

It's about supporting our troops, supporting veterans," Crandall says.

So Friday, they actually added flags to the display.

There are about 500 now.

"I think the flags speak for themselves.

I don't think we need to get into a fight with city hall," says Crandall.

The town hopes the realty company will get in touch so they can discuss the number of

flags.

This is not the first time the realtors have displayed the flags, but it's the first

time they've had a problem.

They usually leave them up until the 4th of July."

What kind of country have we devolved into when we cannot even put a display of American

flags out without the government telling us it is against the law.

It is these types of mundane and arbitrary laws that are the problem.

Furthermore, the type of character and integrity that an individual must lack to actually cite

this illegality as a state employee.

There should be no shame and no criticism for trying to honor our veterans and those

who have died serving our country.

That is part of the fabric of our society.

Some gave all, and all gave some and we should recognize these sacrifices every day and not

just on Veterans Day or Memorial Day.

God bless the business and their staff in Chelmsford for trying to pay homage and give

respect for those who put their lives on the line in defense of our country and our rights.

Share if you agree.

Share if you believe that these arbitrary rules making it illegal to put flags on the

lawn should be gone.

Share if you think the town did the right thing by supporting the business.

Share if you hope that something like this does not happen again.

For more infomation >> Officials Tell Business Not To Put Up Flags, What Outraged Residents Did Instead Has Them Regretting - Duration: 4:50.

-------------------------------------------

BBC viewers were slamming Mark Lawrenson for what he said about Kante v Australia - Duration: 4:21.

Football News24/7  France kicked off their 2018 World Cup campaign on Saturday with a vital yet unconvincing win over Australia in Kazan

 Antoine Griezmann put his nation ahead in the 58th-minute with a controversial penalty, only for Aussie captain Mile Jedinak to equalise from the spot four minutes later

 The winning goal came ten minutes from time as Paul Pogba's effort deflected off Aziz Behich, looped over a helpless Mathew Ryan onto the crossbar and inches over the line

 It was a scrappy performance from Didier Deschamps men at times, but one player who definitely played well throughout the match was N'Golo Kante

 The Chelsea star went about his work in typically un-flashy fashion, and football fans weren't happy with what Mark Lawrenson said about him during the World Cup clash

What Lawro said about Kante  Kante was selected in the starting XI at the base of a three-man midfield alongside Bayern Munich's Corentin Tolisso and Manchester United's Pogba

 Viewers who tuned in to BBC's coverage of France 2-1 Australia would've heard Lawrenson on co-commentary and his somewhat dubious comments on the 27-year-old

 Five minutes before the interval, as you can hear in the video below, Lawro was analysing Kante's position and dished out some criticism

 "One of the other problems is Kante is playing so deep," the 61-year-old pundit said

"He's almost at times playing as a third centre-back when the French have the ball

" Fans react to Kante criticism  In addition to making tackles and breaking up play, part of Kante's job is to get the ball of France's defenders and start their attacks

 It's also ironic that, when Lawrenson made his remarks about Kante's role, the midfielder was in the final third, receiving the ball from a throw-in and linking up with Pogba

 Lots of people slammed ex-Liverpool defender Lawrenson, believing his criticism of Kante (and Tolisso) was unjustified, and they voiced their opinion on Twitter

 Check out the best reaction below:  The next assignment for France, one of the World Cup favourites, in Group C is a match with South American outfit Peru in Yekaterinburg

 What is YOUR opinion on Kante's role during France 2-1 Australia? Do YOU agree with Lawro or the fans? Have YOUR say in the comments box below!  Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE: https://www

givemesport.com/writeforgms

For more infomation >> BBC viewers were slamming Mark Lawrenson for what he said about Kante v Australia - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

What is happening in Yemen?: The battle for the port of Hodeidah | The New Daily - Duration: 4:53.

 The battle for the western Yemen port of Hodeidah over the past week could be a tipping point in the three-year civil war that has thrust millions of Yemeni people to the brink of famine

 A Saudi-led alliance of Arab states has closed in on Hodeida since June 13 in an extensive assault to reclaim the rebel-held port city

 Hodeida is a vital lifeline to the impoverished nation that relies almost entirely on imported food, medicine and fuel, from both commercial and humanitarian sources

 The Yemeni pro-government forces are reported to be on the brink of retaking Hodeidah's airport after their Apache attack helicopters bombed a strip of the coastal territory as well as the main road to Yemen's capital city, Sana'a, as tens of thousands of people attempt to flee the port city

 Yemen's government said on Saturday it would "not attack" the vital port. Foreign Minister Khaled Alyemany said the pro-government troops and militia, who are backed by the Saudi-led coalition, would instead seek to preserve key infrastructure, according to the BBC

 United Arab Emirates Ambassador to Australia Obaid Al Heri Salem Ketbi said a comprehensive aid delivery strategy would follow military action with support for people in Hodeidah city

 "We will establish direct shipping lanes to ensure aid starts arriving as soon as possible," he said

 However, the United Nations and humanitarian aid agencies remain fearful for the lives of thousands of civilians, with more than 90 per cent of food imported into Yemen overall – and 70 per cent of that food imported through the port of Hodeidah

Why is Yemen at war? It's estimated 10,000 Yeminis have been killed and millions on the cusp of starvation after more than three years of civil war

 Fighting began in 2014 when the Houthi Shia Muslim rebel movement seized control of northern Saada province and neighbouring areas

 The Iranian-aligned Houthis took hold of the capital Sana'a, forcing authoritarian president Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi into exile

 In 2015, Saudia Aabia and other Sunni Arab states began airstrikes against the Houthis and declared their aim of restoring Mr Hadi's government

 The Saudi-led coalition feared the Houthis' power would give their rival regional power in Iran a foothold in Yemen, which shares its northern  border with Saudi Arabia

What is the state of the humanitarian crisis? The United Nations estimates 8.4 million people remain on the brink of famine in Yemen in what has been labelled the world's worst humanitarian crisis

 Nadine Drummond, a humanitarian aid worker for Save the Children in Sana'a, told one-third of the Yemeni people don't know where their next meal will come from

 Ms Drummond stressed how important it was for the port to remain operational for humanitarian aid, but also the other two-thirds of the population who rely on the commercial import of food, medicine and fuel

 "When we're taking about a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding, it's not just about access to humanitarian aide, it's also about the reliance of commercial imports," she said

 "If that port closes, the whole country is going to spiral out of control."

For more infomation >> What is happening in Yemen?: The battle for the port of Hodeidah | The New Daily - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

Reinhard Bonnke Sermons ➤ "What Is The Basic Gospel Message" ‒ Christ For All Nations - Duration: 34:38.

Reinhard Bonnke Sermons ➤ "What Is The Basic Gospel Message" ‒ Christ For All Nations

For more infomation >> Reinhard Bonnke Sermons ➤ "What Is The Basic Gospel Message" ‒ Christ For All Nations - Duration: 34:38.

-------------------------------------------

The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone. - Duration: 4:05.

  The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone

 Sajid Javid, who is in charge of the nation's policing and security, said he was targeted by criminals outside Euston station in north London

 The incident happened during his previous role as Communities Secretary, he told The Sun

Facebook Twitter  "It happened in a flash. I was walking out of Euston station and reached for my phone to call a taxi," the minister said

 "It was brand new. Before I knew what was happening, it had gone. They just rode up, grabbed it and zoomed off

 "I was angry and upset but thought myself lucky not to have been stabbed or beaten up like many other victims who fall prey to these vicious criminals

"  Mr Javid spoke about the incident after Michael McIntyre was robbed of his watch by moped-riding thieves in a violent incident

 The comedian was on the school run in his Range Rover in north London when thugs smashed the windows before stealing the Rolex

 The incident came amid concerns of a wave of violent crime in some parts of the country, particularly in London and other big cities

 Mr Javid, who has four children, admitted he worries about them if they are out late and his parental concern drives him to tackle the problem

 "Our streets should be safe at all times, you shouldn't have to worry about things like knife or other crime," he said

 Theresa May has acknowledged concerns about moped gangs, but insisted police were being given the powers they need to crack down on crime

 Earlier this month the Prime Minister was challenged about the vernment's response to criminals using mopeds to carry out robberies and other crimes

 She said former home secretary Amber Rudd held talks with police to make sure they had the powers they needed to be able to chase moped-riding criminals

 "This issue of moped crime is one that is of concern for people," the PM said.

For more infomation >> The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone. - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

I was evicted, raped and left penniless: Universal Credit failed its claimants - Duration: 8:05.

 It's been nearly two years since I claimed Universal Credit. I had the misfortune of living in a trial area, where the benefit was tested before it was rolled out to the rest of the UK

   As I watched my life get destroyed, was evicted and left penniless under the 'flagship welfare reform programme', I prayed that I was one of few feeling the true horrors that such a scheme can inflict on people

People are being 'left in real hardship' because of botched Universal Credit rollout But, yesterday's report from the National Audit Office (NAO) clearly shows that I was not the only one suffering

 As more people were moved to Universal Credit, I watched news reports of people freezing to death in homes they couldn't afford to heat and spoke to people who had faced rent arrears and threats of eviction due to delays in payments and errors with processing claims

 I found it hard to believe when MPs stood up in the House of Commons and spoke of how there were only a small number of issues with Universal Credit and that these were being tackled

I questioned how they could be so blind to the pain people were dealing with.  Were they honestly not aware of what was happening?  Did they not want to look at the damage being caused?  Did it seem like too much effort to roll back the scheme?  All I know is that we finally have an official report detailing Universal Credit's failures

 'The Government's introduction of Universal Credit has been one long catalogue of delay with huge impact on people's lives,' said MP Meg Hillier, chair of the public accounts committee, in an official statement

 This single sentence speaks volumes to those who have experienced the neglect that Universal Credit deals its claimants

 Although it has been 23 months, it feels like yesterday that I listened in disbelief and horror as an advisor told me that, months after I'd filed a claim for Universal Credit, my application had been rejected because their system didn't have my current address on file – despite the fact I'd provided it

 I remember the numb pain I felt in the pit of my stomach as I opened my bedroom door to my landlord and he told me that he was going to evict me, because I wasn't able to pay my rent

 I remember the fear and shame I felt every time I had to climb over a ticket barrier on the London Underground because my Oyster didn't have enough money on it

 I remember counting 20p coins to buy a loaf of bread, then rationing it out for weeks and picking mould off the slices because I couldn't afford to buy anything more

 I remember sleeping on a mattress blackened with filth in a stranger's bedsit, because I had nowhere else to go after my landlord finally kicked me out

 I remember the horror that spiked in my stomach whenever this stranger, my rapist, unlocked the door and thumped a box of condoms down on the counter, because I knew what was coming

 I remember preparing myself for the pain of being forced into sex against my will

 I remember stealing food so I wouldn't starve, and part of me was hoping I'd be caught and sent to jail, because at least then I wouldn't have to worry about food, money, staying warm, and being raped

 When I first started writing about Universal Credit, I was tweeted stories from people who had endured similar levels of pain

 'Stealing to survive is a reality', one of them said. 'Solidarity,' I replied, as did others

 It became the word we used to express our shared understanding of what we were going through

 We were ordinary, hard-working people who had fallen into unlucky circumstances, and been kicked when we were already down

 Our common interest was to survive under a scheme that felt as if it was designed to make our lives more difficult, and to support those who reached out for help

 Because we knew that Universal Credit would not help us.  The people who did were complete strangers, those who provided me with the tools I needed to get my life back on track; a home, toiletries, food and someone to talk to

 I only got these resources after I'd suffered at the hands of a government resource that claims to provide support to those who need it

 The hardest reality I had to face as a Universal Credit claimant was being dealt the response that the system was working correctly and that, in fact, I wasn't working hard enough

 The 40 job applications a week that I was putting in, the numerous interviews I was being rejected from for simply not being the right fit at the right time, it was all my fault, because I wasn't working hard enough

 As a whole, we felt we were somehow to blame for the circumstances that had led to our unemployment, and it was our fault if we were neglected by Universal Credit

 We felt too scared to call out the system for f***ing us up, for fear it'd f*** us up more and take away the meager allowance dribbled out to us when they felt like it

 What spoke to me most was when Hillier said 'DWP needs to wake up and understand what is going so wrong before future claimants share a similar fate

'  This is what I had hoped for, as I was starving, homeless and penniless after being abused by Universal Credit

 Will the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) actually wake up and admit they could be the ones at fault after this report, or will it be dismissed, with countless more lives to be destroyed?      

For more infomation >> I was evicted, raped and left penniless: Universal Credit failed its claimants - Duration: 8:05.

-------------------------------------------

Sajid Javid reveals his phone was stolen by moped muggers - Duration: 4:05.

 The Home Secretary has revealed he was mugged by moped thieves who stole his mobile phone

 Sajid Javid, who is in charge of the nation's policing and security, said he was targeted by criminals outside Euston station in north London

 The incident happened during his previous role as Communities Secretary, he told The Sun

 "It happened in a flash. I was walking out of Euston station and reached for my phone to call a taxi," the minister said

 "It was brand new. Before I knew what was happening, it had gone. They just rode up, grabbed it and zoomed off

 "I was angry and upset but thought myself lucky not to have been stabbed or beaten up like many other victims who fall prey to these vicious criminals

" Why aren't police doing more to tackle violent moped muggings?  Mr Javid spoke about the incident after Michael McIntyre was robbed of his watch by moped-riding thieves in a violent incident

 The comedian was on the school run in his Range Rover in north London when thugs smashed the windows before stealing the Rolex

 The incident came amid concerns of a wave of violent crime in some parts of the country, particularly in London and other big cities

 Mr Javid, who has four children, admitted he worries about them if they are out late and his parental concern drives him to tackle the problem

 "Our streets should be safe at all times, you shouldn't have to worry about things like knife or other crime," he said

There's a weapon police could deploy against violent crime - but they're not using it  Theresa May has acknowledged concerns about moped gangs, but insisted police were being given the powers they need to crack down on crime

 Earlier this month the Prime Minister was challenged about the Government's response to criminals using mopeds to carry out robberies and other crimes

 She said former home secretary Amber Rudd held talks with police to make sure they had the powers they needed to be able to chase moped-riding criminals

 "This issue of moped crime is one that is of concern for people," the PM said.

For more infomation >> Sajid Javid reveals his phone was stolen by moped muggers - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

What Gary Neville said about Marcos Rojo at half-time on ITV was simply hilarious - Duration: 4:21.

Football News24/7  Manchester United legend Gary Neville was in the ITV studio during Argentina's World Cup opener against Iceland on Saturday afternoon

 Argentina reached the final in 2014 but Leo Messi will be desperate to finally win some silverware for his country

 They are one of the favourites to win the competition in Russia but they went in at half-time drawing 1-1

 Manchester City's Sergio Aguero had given Argentina the lead with a brilliant finish in the 19th minute before Alfred Finnbogason equalised four minutes later

 Man United defender Marcos Rojo bagged the assist for Aguero's goal.  The 28-year-old Argentine, who only made nine Premier League appearances this season, mis-hit his shot from distance and Aguero controlled it brilliantly before firing into the roof of the net

 In the studio, Neville wasn't so impressed by Rojo's role in the goal. Neville on Rojo  Rojo joined Man United from Sporting CP back in 2014 but doesn't appear to have convinced Neville of his shooting abilities

 Speaking live on ITV at half-time, the retired Man United legend called Rojo a "muppet" for attempting a shot

 Neville said: "When the ball came to Rojo - I've been watching him for four years at United - I was thinking, 'don't shoot from there, you Muppet

"  Fans on social media were absolutely loving it.  Twitter found Neville's comment hilarious but you would imagine that Rojo won't find it quite so funny

 Hockey player Samantha Quek jumped to Rojo's defence with a brilliant response - the pot calling the kettle black

 Rojo signed a new deal at Man United in March but admitted that he recently spoke to Jose Mourinho about his lack of playing time

 The Argentine international said: "I cannot blame Jose, but at the end of the season, with fear, I went to talk to him and I tried to ask him what was going on

 "He told me there were several in situations similar to mine. And he was going to put the one in who was better

"  Mourinho is also working as a pundit in Russia during the World Cup and will be keeping a keen eye on Rojo's performances

 Do YOU want to write for GiveMeSport? Get started today by signing-up and submitting an article HERE: https://www

givemesport.com/writeforgms

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét