Auto news on Youtube Apr 26 2018

Robert Mueller, the special prosecutor looking into possible collusion , and other crimes

of the Trump administration, confirmed in court filings that were released this week,

that he is in fact 100% targeting Donald Trump Jr for that June 2016 meeting that he had

at Trump Tower with the Russian lawyer, and whoever else was in that room.

We still don't know exactly who all was there, but here's what we do know.

According to the filings that Mueller and his team put forward with the court, they

admitted this because they were justifying their raid on Paul Manafort's office, and

said they were looking for information about that June 2016 meeting, specifically as it

pertained to Donald Trump Jr. Paul Manafort was also present at that meeting, as was Jared

Kushner.

Mueller admits that he wants to know more about that meeting, or at least when had that

file those they wanted to know more.

God only knows that they know at this point.

But here's what the public knows, Natalia Veselnitskaya, the lawyer in question who

was at that meeting from Russia, has admitted that Donald Trump Jr went to that meeting

expecting to get some kind of damning information about Hillary Clinton, and that's what they

talked about.

They didn't talk about adoptions, as the Trump administration claims.

They talked about getting dirt on Donald Trump's political opponent, and yeah, if she was working

on behalf of the Russian government, which we know that now she was, that would be collusion.so

we know at this point one of the hardest things in the world to prove, which would be collusion.

Robert Mueller is actively going down that path, and he suspects that at least Donald

Trump Jr and Paul Manafort, and most likely Jared Kushner, were involved with that charge.

And if Donald Trump himself, as those at the White House have said, altered Trump Jr's

response to the New York Times, that's not necessarily obstruction of justice, but it

could show that he was also aware of why that meeting happened, why it took place, and what

was said during that meeting.

So that also kind of implicates him as well.

The bottom line is that Robert Mueller's investigation is not going away any time soon, and what

little tidbits we're getting out of the investigation seem to indicate that very high profile members

of the Trump family, if not Trump himself, are in very, very much trouble at this point.

If he suspects Trump Jr of collusion, or committing treason, or whatever it is, there is no question

that Donald Trump himself was aware of it, knew about it, and sanctioned it.

That will be the next shoe to drop, and probably the last shoe to drop, out of this entire

Mueller Investigation.

For more infomation >> Mueller Confirms That He Is DEFINITELY Targeting Donald Trump, Jr. - Duration: 3:12.

-------------------------------------------

What If Thanos Was Real? - Duration: 4:34.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey.

With Avengers Infinity War fast approaching, nerds and non-nerds alike are eagerly awaiting

the arrival of Thanos, The Mad Titan.

But what if this death-obsessed superpowered villain resided not on the pages of comic

books or the silver screen, but was actually real?

Let's explore.

By the way, if comic books are your bag, and if you're watching this video I suspect

they might be, head on over to Top 10 Nerd.

It's a sister channel hosted by Kelly Paoli, Roya Destroyaa, and yours truly, where we

talk about all things nerd.

I'll see you over there.

But for now, get ready, it's time to ask the question: What if Thanos was Real?

In order to avoid similarities with other lists like What if Superheroes were Real,

this video will assume that Thanos is the only superpowered individual.

So we won't have superheroes to help us, and he won't have supervillains to help

him.

First of all, we should probably go over the capabilities of the Mad Titan, since most

people aren't particularly knowledgeable about the guy.

Thanos is the most powerful of the Eternals from the planet Titan.

He has greatly enhanced strength, speed, stamina, and healing...

He's extremely smart, and super durable; he's even survived attacks at point blank

range that would have destroyed a planet.

He can teleport thanks to his link to his techno-mystical transport chair, can manipulate

matter, and has powerful telepathic abilities.

One thing we would have going for us is that Thanos wouldn't have much help.

Based on the stipulations given at the beginning, Thanos wouldn't have any superpowered allies,

so his powerful Black Order wouldn't be a problem.

However, the many dangerous inventions and creations of Thanos could certainly have terrible

results.

For example, he's been known to make impressive and powerful clones of himself, called the

Thanosi, that he can make to do his bidding.

Usually.

He also has access to a variety of robotic drones, which serve a number of functions,

although in this case, battle drones would probably be the most relevant.

So, Thanos has his own powers, clones, and robotic drones, not to mention whatever powerful

weaponry he brings to the table.

What would happen if he attacked the Earth?

Well, one big question would be whether or not the Infinity Stones and Infinity Gauntlet

existed in this hypothetical world.

If Thanos was real but the stones and gauntlet were not, he would certainly be a threat,

but one that could be dealt with.

If he attacked the Earth, the nations of the world would need to unite to defend against

the alien threat.

Nuclear weapon production would begin in earnest, to be used against invading spaceships.

Militaries from around the world would work together to fight off the invaders.

It would be tough, and the odds would be against us, but we could potentially come out on top

if we were lucky.

Of course, if we lost the war, it's likely that the world would be decimated, and humanity

and other animal life would be extinguished.

But if we were victorious, it could begin a new era for humanity.

Perhaps the global cohesion would stick, allowing the countries of the world to unite under

a single banner.

This could prevent, or at least limit, warfare between nations on earth, allowing us to focus

on scientific and technological advancement, in hopes of colonizing new worlds.

Furthermore, the existence of Thanos and his impressive inventions could help humanity

to advance technologically.

Many of his abilities, such as teleportation, would baffle scientists, and could potentially

lead to significant advances here on Earth.

Even if we were unable to salvage his technology, the mere knowledge that something is possible

can often aid researchers to discover a method to achieve it.

Kind of like the invention of the Ansible in Ender's Game.

Of course, it's possible that we would go back to business as usual after his defeat,

with various countries squabbling over who deserves more credit, who needs more help

rebuilding, or who should have more power in the future world.

But let's stay optimistic for now.

If, however, Thanos DID have the gauntlet, optimism wouldn't getcha too far.

When fitted with the six infinity stones, the Infinity Gauntlet gives its bearer control

over Time, Space, Power, Reality, Minds, and Time.

That is to say, it makes a person able to do essentially anything they damn well please.

And the thing with Thanos is that his goal is to kill a bunch of people to impress the

female personification of Death.

With whom he is in love.

It's a long story.

The bottom line is, if Thanos had the infinity gauntlet, he would win, and we would probably

all die.

And now we return to our question: What if Thanos was Real?

Well, this would largely depend on whether or not he has the infinity gauntlet.

If he didn't have it, we could potentially win the war against him and his creations,

and it could usher in an era of peace and prosperity to Earth.

However, if he had the gauntlet, or he didn't but still won the war, humanity would be in

big trouble.

We'd probably be killed, to appease his bae Death, and Thanos would go off in search

of more lives to destroy.

So let's keep our fingers crossed and hope that he does not, in fact, exist.

Thank you for watching Life's Biggest Questions, I hope this was interesting and informative,

and maybe even inspired you to look into it further on your own.

If you liked this video, please thumbs up and subscribe to the channel down below.

While you're down there, let me know what superhero you would most like to be friends

with.

And as I said earlier, if you're looking for some nerdy videos, check out Top 10 Nerd!

Until next time, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey with Life's Biggest Questions, wishing you

the best of luck, on your quest for answers.

For more infomation >> What If Thanos Was Real? - Duration: 4:34.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING OBAMA BUSTED IN WHAT WAS JUST FOUND INSIDE HIS SICK 'SECRET EMPIRES' - Duration: 22:39.

BREAKING: OBAMA BUSTED IN WHAT WAS JUST FOUND INSIDE HIS SICK 'SECRET EMPIRES'

On yesterday's "Lou Dobbs Tonight" on the Fox Business Network, Peter Schweizer

who is an editor for Breitbart News and an author blew the lid off of the Obama Crime

Syndicate.Image result for BREAKING: Obama BUSTED In What Was Just Found Inside His SICK

'Secret Empires'

Peter Schweizer, whose upcoming book, "Secret Empires: How the American Political Class

Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends," explains how the Obama administration spent

their whole eight years in office using regulations to help the president's friends acquire

more and more wealth.

During Schweizer's interview with Lou Dobbs, he explained and gave a whole roadmap as to

what former President Barack Obama did to help his friends.

Schweizer explained that Obama's best friend, Marty Nesbitt set up an equity fund while

his friend Obama was the regulator in chief.

Then he invests in highly regulated industries.

As an example of this, the author stated that the Obama would decide that the for-profit

University of Pheonix is not a good school so he would then regulate it through an executive

order so the GI Bill money won't be allowed to go there anymore.

When this happens the stocks would go from $100 to $3 a share.

So then comes Nesbitt and buys up as much stock as he can, and once he is done.

Obama would turn around and said, "Now that I come to think of it, that was a mistake,"

so he reverses the regulation which in turn puts the stock at over $100 again, making

Nesbit have an enormous profit.

Via Breitbart:

'Schweizer said, "Barack Obama's best friend, a guy named Marty Nesbitt…sets up

a private equity fund while his friend is the regulator-in-chief, and what he does is

he invests in what he calls 'highly-regulated industries.'

… And so, to give you one brief example, the University of Phoenix, the for-profit

school, Barack Obama's administration says, 'We think this school is bad.

We're going to suspend the Pentagon from using GI Bill money for soldiers to go to

school there.'

Well, of course, the stock price goes from $100 a share to about $3 a share.

Guess who steps in to buy it?

Barack Obama's best friend Marty Nesbitt and his company Vistria investors.

They come in.

They buy it for pennies on the dollar.

And then lo and behold, the Obama administration says 'You know what, we think we're going

to let GI money flow again back to the University of Phoenix.'

And that pattern is repeated over and over again in other sectors of the economy.

It was rampant."

This same pattern repeated over and over again in multiple areas of the economy.

With Obama regulating, his friends such as George Soros buying and then changing his

mind while at the same time making his friends billions.

So next time your liberal friends start saying "Obama's time in office was scandal-free,"

you can tell the story about the regulator in chief and how he manipulated the stock

market into making his friends billions while regular folks like us paid the hefty price.

Here is more on Peter Schweizer's new book, "Secret Empires: How the American Political

Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends:"

"From the New York Times bestselling author of Clinton Cash comes an explosive new political

expose!

Peter Schweizer has been fighting corruption—and winning—for years.

In Throw Them All Out, he exposed insider trading by members of Congress, leading to

the passage of the STOCK Act.

In Extortion, he uncovered how politicians use mafia-like tactics to enrich themselves.

And in Clinton Cash, he revealed the Clintons' massive money machine and sparked an FBI investigation.

Now he explains how a new corruption has taken hold, involving larger sums of money than

ever before.

Stuffing tens of thousands of dollars into a freezer has morphed into multibillion-dollar

equity deals done in the dark corners of the world.

An American bank opening in China would be prohibited by US law from hiring a slew of

family members of top Chinese politicians.

However, a Chinese bank opening in America can hire anyone it wants.

It can even invite the friends and families of American politicians to invest in can't-lose

deals.

President Donald Trump's children have made front pages across the world for their dicey

transactions.

However, the media has barely looked into questionable deals made by those close to

Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Mitch McConnell, and lesser-known politicians who

have been in the game longer.

In many parts of the world, the children of powerful political figures go into business

and profit handsomely, not necessarily because they are good at it, but because people want

to curry favor with their influential parents.

This is a relatively new phenomenon in the United States.

But for relatives of some prominent political families, we may already be talking about

hundreds of millions of dollars.

Deeply researched and packed with shocking revelations, Secret Empires identifies public

servants who cannot be trusted and provides a path toward a more accountable government.'Image

result for Obama sad

Scroll down and leave a comment below!

For more infomation >> BREAKING OBAMA BUSTED IN WHAT WAS JUST FOUND INSIDE HIS SICK 'SECRET EMPIRES' - Duration: 22:39.

-------------------------------------------

What The Hurt Locker Actually Says about the US, its Soldiers, and Iraq - Duration: 10:24.

Stop the car!

Take cover!

Hi, my name is Gabe and in this video I'll be looking into The Hurt Locker.

Did you know that, adjusting for inflation,

The Hurt Locker is the lowest grossing best picture winner of all time?

That's unfortunate, because I think it is not just one of the best war films,

but one of the best films of any genre, ever made.

I'm craving a burger, is that strange?

Not for you, no.

Before I begin: spoilers ahead.

Alright, lets get into it.

IED!

The first thing I'd like to address is the number one complaint about this film:

that it, Staff Sergeant James in particular, is an inaccurate depiction of how US soldiers operate.

I have no doubt this is true; even if the writer, who was imbedded as a journalist in Iraq,

claims every event in the film actually happened.

For every event to happen to the same person,

or rather, for the same person to do all the things James does,

You want me to go close to it?

Yeah.

- [Arabic] - No, I'm kidding, I'm kidding.

really does seem unreal.

But this doesn't bother me.

I used to simply say that the film is a narrative, not a documentary, but that is a cop out explanation.

The real reason this doesn't bother me is it isn't what the film is about.

Other than at the plot level, The Hurt Locker isn't about US soldiers, or operations in Iraq,

or anything like that.

Instead, the film is about something else entirely,

and it's not a secret either; they tell us right up front.

This film is about war being an addiction.

There's no question that James loves bomb diffusion too much; he practically tells us so here.

The older you get, the fewer things your really love.

By the time you get to my age, maybe its only one or two things.

With me I think it's one.

But no one else in the film even likes Iraq.

I fucking hate this place.

Alright, let's get out of this fucking desert!

Because of this, the film clearly is not about soldiers being addicted to war.

I've actually heard few criticisms on the accuracy of Sanborn and Eldridge,

leading me to believe that they, not James, are meant to represent the actual soldiers in Iraq.

So who does James represent?

A common plot point in this film is how James's behavior puts not only himself in danger,

Get down now!

but Sanborn and Eldridge as well.

We can go!

And if Sanborn and Eldridge represent the soldiers fighting in Iraq,

that means James represents those putting them in danger.

Now turn of your goddamn torch, because we're going.

Despite this, James clearly does not represent insurgents, or terrorists, or anything like that.

I mean, he's fighting them, he tries to save the people they sacrifice,

and he loves the US and hates its enemies;

You know there are guys watching us right now.

They're laughing at this!

this last fact alone makes it clear that James is not meant to represent them.

So other than the enemy, who else put US soldiers at risk?

One group is the people who sent them to war in the first place.

And that is who James represents:

the American people, specifically Bush's America,

specifically specifically the people and politicians in Bush's America

who supported the war and sent soldiers to Iraq.

You want to go out there?

Yes I do.

This may be an esoteric claim, but there is evidence in the film to support it.

James bills himself as a proud redneck,

I'm pretty sure I can figure out a redneck piece of trailer trash like you.

Well it looks like you're on the right track.

the people Bush most appealed to and who, more than anyone, claim to be "true Americans".

James also views his work as a game,

Game-face buddy, let's go.

while in the US war dominates the video game industry

and we even put Iraqi's most wanted on playing cards.

Nine-of-hearts, that's one. And the other, Al Rouie(?), jack-of-clubs.

James also prefers boots on the ground as a first response and in general has a cocky,

cowboy attitude, something many said was characteristic of the US when Bush was in charge.

So if James is addicted to war, and James represents Bush's America,

that means that, according to the filmmakers, Bush's America was addicted to war too.

The natural follow up is: what does the film have to say about this?

I mean, addiction isn't necessarily bad, not if it can be channeled into something positive.

Like what I'm guessing Kathryn Bigelow does with filmmaking; from what I can see,

her feelings about filmmaking are how she connected with James and put herself into this movie.

The Hurt Locker actually has multiple instances where it gives its thoughts on this issue.

First, there's the fact that James loves bomb diffusion, an inherently non-destructive act,

very different than if he were a mercenary, sniper, demolition expert, or anything like that.

And you can add to this that he is really good at his job.

There's also the fact that deep down, James is a good person,

one who is caring, is guided by honorable principles, and knows the difference between right and wrong.

And at the end of the day, he's there for his team and he does try to do the right thing,

no matter how much it doesn't seem so sometimes.

Everything I just mentioned is positive, and these are the reasons that at first glance,

The Hurt Locker may seem more neutral than anti-Iraq war.

You're alright buddy, you're alright.

But anti-Iraq war it is, as is shown in several other moments.

Like this one.

Despite all of James's talent and bravado, despite everything he's accomplished,

this is the first time he has the opportunity to save someone who needs saving, and he fails.

Sure, it's not his fault and he did all he could, but still.

There's also this scene, where James literally breaks into an Iraqi's home,

then refuses to connect with the homeowners when they treat him as their guest.

You are a guest. Please, sit down.

I'm a guest...

Or here, where James was making friends with an Iraqi,

before events occurred that made the friendship not worth it.

Hey man? What's up?

And there's also this line:

Well if he wasn't an insurgent he sure the hell is now.

Sure, it's said jokingly but also in an ironic and funny-because-it's-true style.

Additional evidence that The Hurt Locker does not support Bush's America's war mentality

can be seen through other characters.

Like Eldridge, who ridicules the quality of items built by the US Army

Did you build that?

No, the US Army did.

and also complains about how much of the war is a waste.

Aren't you glad the Army has all these tanks parked here?

Just in case the Russians come, we have to have a big tank battle.

Or Sanborn, and how he believes the people back home feel about him.

Shrapnel zings by, slices my throat,

I bleed out like a pig in the sand.

Nobody'll give a shit.

And how about this guy, who clearly represents out of touch Americans,

the ones who keep soldiers fighting while they sit on the sidelines.

You know, this doesn't have to be a bad time in your life.

Going to war is a once-in-a-lifetime experience!

It could be fun.

And you know this from your extensive work in the field?

I've done my field duty.

Where was that? Yale?

In the end, he is shown to be an idiot.

But more damning than everything I just mentioned is this scene.

I mean, how do you do it, you know,

take the risk?

I don't know, I just uh,

I guess I don't think about it.

James could have said he does what he does because he knows he's doing the right thing,

or that he is doing his part to make the world a better place.

But he doesn't.

It turns out that once you understand what The Hurt Locker is doing,

you find that it is strongly against the Iraq war.

And even moreso, it is against the mentality of the politicians and citizens who supported it.

But judging by the popularity of films more supportive of Bush's wars,

including Bigelow's very own Zero Dark Thirty,

this clearly wasn't a message many people wanted to hear.

But regardless of whether you wanted to hear it or not,

it is hard to argue that this isn't exceptional filmmaking,

because it is.

For more infomation >> What The Hurt Locker Actually Says about the US, its Soldiers, and Iraq - Duration: 10:24.

-------------------------------------------

What is Zero Gravity Technology? Masseuse Massage - The Remedial Deluxe Plus Massage Chair - Duration: 3:06.

Hi, Michael from Masseuse Massage. This video is going to explain to you a little bit about Zero Gravity and how the Zero Gravity

works on the world's best massage chair the Remedial Deluxe Plus.

Basically, once you've turned the chair on it will take you to a fairly comfortable reclined position.

In order to get it to the Zero Gravity position you want to press this

Preset button, the reclining preset button, two more times, so you see it'll stop there

I press it two more times, and it will take you all the way down into the Zero Gravity Position.

Now what is zero gravity and why would you want to actually sit in Zero Gravity on the chair?

Zero Gravity was a

concept designed by NASA.

When you sit in a chair in a spaceship, and get shot straight up with rockets behind you into space,

the body's under a lot of pressure and it can actually be a big problem for the astronauts.

So the way they solve that was they found the position to sit them in,

that would actually have the least amount of gravity pressure on their joints and bones and spine.

So that they could handle that intense

rocket launch into the sky and

still survive it and feel no pain. So the concept of Zero Gravity, that's where it came from.

Effectively what it means is that you're in a laying down position, with your feet or your knees above your heart and

as you can see with the Remedial Deluxe Plus, this guy reclines to almost flat, as an

S-Track technology chair, it will recline a lot flatter than any of the L-Tracks out there on the market.

This is a more advanced track and as you can see it allows the chair to get completely flat. Once you're in the Zero Gravity

Position, you can see that what will happen,

similarly to the astronauts is all of the pressure that the gravity is putting on you, on me as I'm standing here right now,

is completely gone so you'll feel weightless while you're sitting in the chair in the Zero Gravity Position.

A lot of our customers have sore lower backs, sore upper backs, all of the joints are giving them chronic pain...

What this position is doing is trying to eliminate all of that pain as a start,

and then what it actually does is it allows the

massage chair to do its work, and to fix those

problems in the best possible way. You can imagine when there's all the gravity and the pressure putting on your lower back for example.

The chair's not going to be able to help you that much.

But once you get into the Zero Gravity position and your lower back is feeling a lot better,

Then the massage hands can get in there and actually work their magic and improve your health.

That's the Gero Gravity, the weightless position of the massage chair.

I hope this explains a little bit more to you about one of those technological terms that we use a lot.

But it really is an important feature, and you want to make sure that you're getting it in the chair that you're purchasing.