Arrest Made in California's Notorious 'Golden Gate Killer' Case
Law enforcement may be seeking the death penalty for the 72-year-old former cop turned serial
murderer — DNA match was key.
The suspect believed to be the notorious Golden State killer — wanted in a dozen murders
and nearly 50 rapes from the late 1970s to the mid-1980s — has been arrested in California,
officials said Wednesday.
Joseph James DeAngelo, 72, was arrested early Wednesday at his Citrus Heights home, located
16 miles northeast of Sacramento, after a DNA sample matched that of the Golden State
Killer, officials said at a news conference.
(Shown above are sketches of the suspect that were in the possession of the Sacramento County
Sheriff's Department.)
County records show DeAngelo is currently in the Sacramento County Main Jail, where
he's being held on two counts of first-degree murder.
He is reportedly on suicide watch.
Officials said prosecutors will seek the death penalty against DeAngelo –– who is reportedly
a former police officer.
Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert said that DNA led investigators to
identifying DeAngelo and helped solve the case in the last six days.
"We knew we were looking for a needle in a haystack, but we also knew that needle was
there," Schubert said.
"We found the needle in the haystack and it was right here in Sacramento."
The Golden State Killer is believed to be responsible for at least 12 murders, 45 rapes,
and 120 home burglaries throughout the state of California.
The cold-case killer is believed to have raped 37 people around Sacramento and Central Valley,
and killed two between 1976 and 1978, according to The Sacramento Bee.
Officials believed he moved to the Bay Area and Southern California from there.
DeAngelo worked as an officer with the Exeter Police Department from 1973 until 1976.
He was fired from the Auburn Police Department in 1979 after he was arrested for stealing
a can of dog repellent and a hammer from a drug store, according to Auburn Journal articles
from the time.
Jane Carson-Sandler, who is believed to have been raped by the Golden State Killer, also
known as the East Area Rapist, told South Carolina's The Island Packet that on Wednesday
she was contacted by authorities about his possible arrest.
"I just found out this morning," she told the newspaper.
"I'm overwhelmed with joy.
I've been crying, sobbing."
For more infomation >> Arrest Made in California's Notorious 'Golden Gate Killer' Case - Duration: 2:36.-------------------------------------------
California Bill to Create Ministry Of Truth To Censor Alternative Media - Duration: 6:03.
California Bill to Create Ministry Of Truth To Censor Alternative Media
By John Vibes
Legislation is being considered in the state of California that would effectively kill
free-speech online by placing unprecedented regulations and restrictions on media outlets,
especially those who deviate from the official government narrative on controversial issues.
The senator who proposed the bill, Richard Pan, was also behind the infamous bill mandating
vaccinations for children who attend government schools.
According to the text of this bill, titled SB1424 Internet: social media: false information:
strategic plan:
This bill would require any person who operates a social media, as defined, Internet Web site
with a physical presence in California to develop a strategic plan to verify news stories
shared on its Web site.
The bill would require the plan to include, among other things, a plan to mitigate the
spread of false information through news stories, the utilization of fact-checkers to verify
news stories, providing outreach to social media users, and placing a warning on a news
story containing false information.
(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in
California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet
Web site.
(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.
(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.
(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.
(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.
(c) As used in this section, �social media� means an electronic service or account, or
electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video
blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet
Web site profiles orlocations.
This bill would place the government of the state of California in a position of arbiter
of truth and would allow them to censor any information that runs counter to the official
narrative.
This is especially dangerous for activists and dissenters, or anyone who finds themselves
questioning authority or exposing corruption.
The �fact checkers� that major platforms like Facebook have relied on in the past are
proven to be attack dogs of the establishment, who are obviously approaching the stories
with their own subjective bias.
For example, Politifact was caught changing vital information about Syrian gas attacks
when the mainstream narrative on the subject changed.
Last month, The Free Thought Project experienced Politifact�s corruption firsthand, when
they marked one of our articles as �false� because a local police department changed
their story after the fact.
They also used quotes from our staff out of context.
Unsurprisingly, this was an article about guns, the hot-button topic of the week where
the mainstream is attempting to control the narrative.
Snopes, the most popular �fact checker� is even worse, and we have caught them in
multiple lies and deceptions over the years.
Just a few months ago, our staff called out Snopes for lying about House Joint Resolution
76, which presented huge Fourth Amendment concerns.
Snopes has also been complicit in allowing flimsy stories promoting a new cold war with
Russia to go �unchecked� for evidence or facts.
Last year, Snopes gave The Washington Post a pass, allowing them to publish a false report
about the Russians hacking Vermont�s power grid.
Snopes has been riddled with stories of corruption in recent years, from fraud and embezzlement
to using company funds to pay for prostitution.
David and Barbara Mikkelson, ex-spouses and founders of Snopes, have been mixed up in
an ongoing legal battle since their divorce, and many of these details were revealed in
court.
As The Free Thought Project reported last week, the government of Malaysia recently
banned what they deem to be �fake news,� and is now threatening 6 years in prison for
people who share content that they disagree with.
Various neighboring countries in Southeast Asia, including Singapore and the Philippines,
are introducing similar laws.
Meanwhile, some European countries already have these types of laws on the books.
Last year in Germany, legislation was passed that legally forces publishers to delete whatever
the state deems to be hate speech or misinformation.
Earlier this year, French President Emmanuel Macron called for emergency legal action to
crack down on �fake news� during elections.
These governments say that they are protecting their citizens from misinformation, but what
they are really doing is protecting themselves from competition.
As many of these politicians have pointed out, the sea of information available to us
on the internet has fundamentally changed the way that governments operate and it has
stifled their ability to keep the masses of society bound
to a particular worldview.
-------------------------------------------
California Bill Would INVADE Ministries to Gay People - Duration: 4:09.
the other thing I think we have to consider is potentially the
implication for for the faith community and I think maybe this bears a little
bit of explanation is Christians do believe in they believe in spiritual
transformation. Christians believe that we are all sinners but we all equally
fall short of the glory of God. But because of what Christ did on the cross
we've been given a new heart and we've been given a spirit that transforms us
and so Christians believe that across the board and they practice that in
their faith. And there are books there are conferences there are areas where
there could be a transaction involved but our legitimate practices of of a
faith. Mr. chairman members of the committee good morning my name is Kevin
Snider with Pacific Justice Institute Center for Public Policy where I serve
as chief counsel. I address briefly the legal discussion in the bills analysis
this bill differs significantly from the law banning sexual orientation change
efforts or SOCE for those under 18. Two cases challenged that law under free
speech and free exercise of religion in Picket vs Brown and in Welch
vs Brown the court held that a prohibition on SOCE for persons under 18
survived these challenges because the law was narrowly focused on a regulation
of professional conduct but the Ninth Circuit found that even licensed
professionals could communicate with the public about SOCE. In contrast this bill
prohibits SOCE advertisements by all persons. Further, the court found that licensed professionals
could continue to recommend SOCE to patients and could administer SOCE to
adults and refer minors to unlicensed counselors or religious leaders
yet under this bill all of those First Amendment rights are
swept away. AB-2943 is not a regulation of Professional Conduct it appears under
the consumer fraud statutes rather the business rather than the business and
Professions Code. Unlike the previous law this bill stretches far beyond license
and mental health professionals. It reaches religious ministries engaged in
SOCE if there is an exchange of money for example paying for a religious
retreat a workbook or a seminar. I direct your attention to what this looks like
in an in another state two months ago a church put on a seminar that dealt with
this very issue this happened in Michigan five state lawmakers urged the
Attorney General to investigate and file an injunction against the church for
for violating the Michigan Consumer Protections Act. Mr. Chairman I
urge that the members of this body cast a no vote and I thank you for your
deliberation and for your service to the community. You know the language of the
bill I said I'd like to work on certainly tightening that to make sure
it doesn't infringe upon legitimate practices of our faith and not just
Christian faith but Muslims people of many different faiths have
beliefs that we in this body may not share a majority and this body may
not share but do we want to start down a path. I know I have a colleague who says
I hate slippery slope arguments but there's a reasonwhy we've coined the
phrase slippery slope arguments because once you start down a path other things
could come up
-------------------------------------------
This New Poll Shows 'Sanctuary City REVOLT' is Rising in California - Duration: 4:17.
This New Poll Shows 'Sanctuary City REVOLT' is Rising in California
There's a revolt happening in the land of liberal fruits and nuts.
The conservative, law0-abiding voice is growing louder and louder and as a result, Cali's
"sanctuary city" polices are in danger of being dissolved.
Khi tôi nhận được khoản tiền thanh toán đầu tiên Từ Binomo
Recwwcc5 Ads by Revcontent
This new poll spells very bad news for the pro-illegal/open borders crwd, and goes a
long way to prove that the anti-sanctuary city REVOLT is real.
From Breitbart
A majority of Californians in Orange County oppose sanctuary cities, according to a UC
Berkeley Institute of Government Studies (IGS) poll released on Friday.
The poll found that 51% of Orange County residents oppose the state's sanctuary laws for illegal
immigrants while 47% approve.
Orange County has been leading the anti-sanctuary revolt in the Golden State, which could energize
Republican voters in fall and potentially help save the House of Representatives for
the GOP.
The poll found that 88% of Republicans in California oppose sanctuary cities and more
voters (38%) "strongly oppose" sanctuary cities than "strongly support" (32%).
"Given the political divisions that characterize voter views on these matters, this issue is
likely to become a major campaign issue, not only in this year's elections for governor
and U.S. Senate, but also in the state's many competitive congressional elections this
fall," said Mark DiCamillo, the poll's director.
"These races are taking on added significance this year, as the Democratic Party is targeting
at least seven of the state's Republican-held congressional districts in its efforts to
win back control of the House of Representatives."
After President Donald Trump's administration filed a lawsuit against three of California's
sanctuary laws, arguing that they violate the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, Los
Alamitos started the anti-sanctuary city revolt by passing an ordinance defying the state's
main sanctuary law, SB 54, that bars local authorities from honoring Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainers.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors then voted to join the Trump administration's
lawsuit against California, and other Orange County cities like Huntington Beach, Mission
Viejo, Aliso Viejo, Fountain Valley, and Newport Beach joined the revolt.
The poll also found that 50% of white Californians oppose sanctuary cities and the slimmest majority
of Asians in the state (51%) support the state's sanctuary laws, as opposed to 71% of Latinos
and 67% of black Californians who support sanctuary cities.
Overall, 56% of Californians support sanctuary cities while 41% oppose.
The state's sanctuary laws get strong support in Los Angeles County (61%), the San Francisco
Bay Area (66%), and from Democrats (83%).In the Central Valley, a majority of residents
(52%) oppose the state's sanctuary laws and 58% of Northern California residents outside
the Bay Area also oppose giving sanctuary to illegal immigrants.
Trump last month supported the anti-sanctuary revolt in Orange County, tweeting that his
administration stood in "solidarity with the brave citizens in Orange County defending
their rights against California's illegal and unconstitutional Sanctuary policies."My
Administration stands in solidarity with the brave citizens in Orange County defending
their rights against California's illegal and unconstitutional Sanctuary policies.
California's Sanctuary laws….
— Donald J. Trump SAID
-------------------------------------------
Conductor protagoniza persecución en California | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 0:32.
For more infomation >> Conductor protagoniza persecución en California | Al Rojo Vivo | Telemundo - Duration: 0:32. -------------------------------------------
California, the state with the most expensive gasoline in the whole country | Augusto Desgarenes - Duration: 2:16.
california the state with gasoline more face across the country I prefer the usa
california showed the most costs high gasoline in the past
months of all the USA with prices per gallon that climbed up to 4 points
$ 79 per gallon of gasoline this in the price of the regular in some
angels establishments state california with the most costs
elevated for this fuel traditionally located below
hawaii this April the golden state has claimed a dubious throne because today the
islands present costs between 2.87 and 3 points 70 in ono lulu and even very
distant to those who are in alaska state that only has one
refinery and which has traditionally high prices hawai has shown its
higher costs in the city of Cahuil me with 449 while in Alaska
costs of 438 were detected in the region by name
meanwhile california the highest cost it was 499 the amboy region near
san bernardino neighboring states they present much lower costs for
example the cost per gallon higher in oregon he found himself in beds with
3.99 in Nevada reindeer registered registered up to 399 and in arizona in the area not
urban white hills was reached at 429 in other states for example you leave
register 319 and in houston and dallas in florida on north miami beach reached 397
in illinois chicago they had prices of up to 369 while in new york in
manhattan had the highest price with 367 according to the department's data
of energy the cheapest gasoline in california this week was found in
covelo with a price of 299 per gallon this with opinion information
puntocom for news at the time of my name is to taste of cards we
we listen see you in the next informative note and as I always say
so
-------------------------------------------
California: baja el número de hispanos muertos por armas de fuego | Noticias | Telemundo - Duration: 2:14.
For more infomation >> California: baja el número de hispanos muertos por armas de fuego | Noticias | Telemundo - Duration: 2:14. -------------------------------------------
Race For California Governor Makes A Stop In Pasadena - Duration: 2:56.
For more infomation >> Race For California Governor Makes A Stop In Pasadena - Duration: 2:56. -------------------------------------------
Así es la fuerte oposición que se vive en California tras convertirse en estado santuario - Duration: 2:04.
For more infomation >> Así es la fuerte oposición que se vive en California tras convertirse en estado santuario - Duration: 2:04. -------------------------------------------
California Is Complaining About This New Immigration Tactic - Duration: 11:47.
California Is Complaining About This New Immigration Tactic
Earlier this week, President Trump proposed a new question to add in the 2020 census form.
The question is sparking controversy as it involves questioning one's citizenship.
Now, the blue-dominated state of California is whining over this new tactic–and is going
so far as to sue.
The Trump administration vowed to include the question of whether someone was a citizen
or not on the 2020 census.
California rebutted with their decision to sue the administration.
The Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, announced the suit against the government, claiming
the question was "unlawful."
Attorney General Becerra tweeted the decision:
Fox News reported:
The Commerce Department said in a statement that the citizenship question would be added
in response to a request by the Justice Department made in December.
The statement said that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross "has determined that reinstatement
of a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire is necessary to provide
complete and accurate census block level data."
Democrats have criticized the administration's announcement, saying the inclusion of such
a question amounts to an effort to intimidate immigrant communities and siphon money and
electoral power away from them.
In a San Francisco Chronicle opinion piece published Monday, Becerra and California Secretary
of State Alex Padilla wrote that the inclusion of a citizenship question would be "illegal"
and "an extraordinary attempt by the Trump administration to hijack the 2020 census for
political purposes."
"California, with its large immigrant communities, would be disproportionately harmed by depressed
participation in the 2020 census," they wrote.
"An undercount would threaten at least one of California's seats in the House of Representatives
(and, by extension, an elector in the electoral college.)"
It is likely the disapproval of the question stems from California's lost sanctuary city
policies.
Since the decennial census is required by Constitution to determine federal spending,
California's loss of funding would be devastating to the massive state.
Leave us your thoughts
in the comments
section below.
-------------------------------------------
The Mother Official Trailer California Pictures - Duration: 1:51.
The law is not something you can mess with whenever you like!
We'll put him on the wanted list and find him immediately.
Perhaps it's too late, Chief.
Even if it's a late pregnancy, this child will be the only person you can depend on
Poor woman, why does she have to go through something like this
Why are you waiting around for?
Go away.
Don't give anything to this scum.
Togtokh Khand
Togtokh Khand was suppose to stay here and teach after graduation.
But instead, he came to be with me.
We...
We were...
expecting a child.
You won't die as long as your mother lives.
I wish I could go back...
You should blame your womb for this.
To my estranged mother.
The Mother
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét