Auto news on Youtube Apr 29 2018

This New Poll Shows 'Sanctuary City REVOLT' is Rising in California

There's a revolt happening in the land of liberal fruits and nuts.

The conservative, law0-abiding voice is growing louder and louder and as a result, Cali's

"sanctuary city" polices are in danger of being dissolved.

Khi tôi nhận được khoản tiền thanh toán đầu tiên Từ Binomo

Recwwcc5 Ads by Revcontent

This new poll spells very bad news for the pro-illegal/open borders crwd, and goes a

long way to prove that the anti-sanctuary city REVOLT is real.

From Breitbart

A majority of Californians in Orange County oppose sanctuary cities, according to a UC

Berkeley Institute of Government Studies (IGS) poll released on Friday.

The poll found that 51% of Orange County residents oppose the state's sanctuary laws for illegal

immigrants while 47% approve.

Orange County has been leading the anti-sanctuary revolt in the Golden State, which could energize

Republican voters in fall and potentially help save the House of Representatives for

the GOP.

The poll found that 88% of Republicans in California oppose sanctuary cities and more

voters (38%) "strongly oppose" sanctuary cities than "strongly support" (32%).

"Given the political divisions that characterize voter views on these matters, this issue is

likely to become a major campaign issue, not only in this year's elections for governor

and U.S. Senate, but also in the state's many competitive congressional elections this

fall," said Mark DiCamillo, the poll's director.

"These races are taking on added significance this year, as the Democratic Party is targeting

at least seven of the state's Republican-held congressional districts in its efforts to

win back control of the House of Representatives."

After President Donald Trump's administration filed a lawsuit against three of California's

sanctuary laws, arguing that they violate the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, Los

Alamitos started the anti-sanctuary city revolt by passing an ordinance defying the state's

main sanctuary law, SB 54, that bars local authorities from honoring Immigration and

Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainers.

The Orange County Board of Supervisors then voted to join the Trump administration's

lawsuit against California, and other Orange County cities like Huntington Beach, Mission

Viejo, Aliso Viejo, Fountain Valley, and Newport Beach joined the revolt.

The poll also found that 50% of white Californians oppose sanctuary cities and the slimmest majority

of Asians in the state (51%) support the state's sanctuary laws, as opposed to 71% of Latinos

and 67% of black Californians who support sanctuary cities.

Overall, 56% of Californians support sanctuary cities while 41% oppose.

The state's sanctuary laws get strong support in Los Angeles County (61%), the San Francisco

Bay Area (66%), and from Democrats (83%).In the Central Valley, a majority of residents

(52%) oppose the state's sanctuary laws and 58% of Northern California residents outside

the Bay Area also oppose giving sanctuary to illegal immigrants.

Trump last month supported the anti-sanctuary revolt in Orange County, tweeting that his

administration stood in "solidarity with the brave citizens in Orange County defending

their rights against California's illegal and unconstitutional Sanctuary policies."My

Administration stands in solidarity with the brave citizens in Orange County defending

their rights against California's illegal and unconstitutional Sanctuary policies.

California's Sanctuary laws….

— Donald J. Trump SAID

For more infomation >> This New Poll Shows 'Sanctuary City REVOLT' is Rising in California - Duration: 4:17.

-------------------------------------------

California Bill to Create Ministry Of Truth To Censor Alternative Media - Duration: 6:03.

California Bill to Create Ministry Of Truth To Censor Alternative Media

By John Vibes

Legislation is being considered in the state of California that would effectively kill

free-speech online by placing unprecedented regulations and restrictions on media outlets,

especially those who deviate from the official government narrative on controversial issues.

The senator who proposed the bill, Richard Pan, was also behind the infamous bill mandating

vaccinations for children who attend government schools.

According to the text of this bill, titled SB1424 Internet: social media: false information:

strategic plan:

This bill would require any person who operates a social media, as defined, Internet Web site

with a physical presence in California to develop a strategic plan to verify news stories

shared on its Web site.

The bill would require the plan to include, among other things, a plan to mitigate the

spread of false information through news stories, the utilization of fact-checkers to verify

news stories, providing outreach to social media users, and placing a warning on a news

story containing false information.

(a) Any person who operates a social media Internet Web site with physical presence in

California shall develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Internet

Web site.

(b) The strategic plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:

(1) A plan to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories.

(2) The utilization of fact-checkers to verify news stories.

(3) Providing outreach to social media users regarding news stories containing false information.

(4) Placing a warning on a news story containing false information.

(c) As used in this section, �social media� means an electronic service or account, or

electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video

blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet

Web site profiles orlocations.

This bill would place the government of the state of California in a position of arbiter

of truth and would allow them to censor any information that runs counter to the official

narrative.

This is especially dangerous for activists and dissenters, or anyone who finds themselves

questioning authority or exposing corruption.

The �fact checkers� that major platforms like Facebook have relied on in the past are

proven to be attack dogs of the establishment, who are obviously approaching the stories

with their own subjective bias.

For example, Politifact was caught changing vital information about Syrian gas attacks

when the mainstream narrative on the subject changed.

Last month, The Free Thought Project experienced Politifact�s corruption firsthand, when

they marked one of our articles as �false� because a local police department changed

their story after the fact.

They also used quotes from our staff out of context.

Unsurprisingly, this was an article about guns, the hot-button topic of the week where

the mainstream is attempting to control the narrative.

Snopes, the most popular �fact checker� is even worse, and we have caught them in

multiple lies and deceptions over the years.

Just a few months ago, our staff called out Snopes for lying about House Joint Resolution

76, which presented huge Fourth Amendment concerns.

Snopes has also been complicit in allowing flimsy stories promoting a new cold war with

Russia to go �unchecked� for evidence or facts.

Last year, Snopes gave The Washington Post a pass, allowing them to publish a false report

about the Russians hacking Vermont�s power grid.

Snopes has been riddled with stories of corruption in recent years, from fraud and embezzlement

to using company funds to pay for prostitution.

David and Barbara Mikkelson, ex-spouses and founders of Snopes, have been mixed up in

an ongoing legal battle since their divorce, and many of these details were revealed in

court.

As The Free Thought Project reported last week, the government of Malaysia recently

banned what they deem to be �fake news,� and is now threatening 6 years in prison for

people who share content that they disagree with.

Various neighboring countries in Southeast Asia, including Singapore and the Philippines,

are introducing similar laws.

Meanwhile, some European countries already have these types of laws on the books.

Last year in Germany, legislation was passed that legally forces publishers to delete whatever

the state deems to be hate speech or misinformation.

Earlier this year, French President Emmanuel Macron called for emergency legal action to

crack down on �fake news� during elections.

These governments say that they are protecting their citizens from misinformation, but what

they are really doing is protecting themselves from competition.

As many of these politicians have pointed out, the sea of information available to us

on the internet has fundamentally changed the way that governments operate and it has

stifled their ability to keep the masses of society bound

to a particular worldview.