Auto news on Youtube Apr 21 2018

Brand New 2018 California Tiny House on Wheels for Sale

For more infomation >> Brand New 2018 California Tiny House on Wheels for Sale - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:39.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

After California Fails To Protect The Border, Donald Sends Them A Political Earthquake - Duration: 3:11.

For more infomation >> After California Fails To Protect The Border, Donald Sends Them A Political Earthquake - Duration: 3:11.

-------------------------------------------

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's 'Charade' After They Refused Orders - Duration: 6:02.

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's 'Charade' After They Refused Orders

After decades of giving Democrats free reign of California, it's starting to seem like

the American residents have finally had enough of the unmitigated disaster said politicians

have turned the once Golden State into.

While the whole state is falling apart with it's out of control homelessness, gas prices

that more than double the national average and streets that look like something out of

a third world ghetto in major cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Sacramento

the governor of the state, Jerry Brown, chooses to battle President Trump's attempt at securing

our borders instead of fixing what California citizens have to deal with on a daily basis.

Last month President Trump asked the governors of border states to help address the severe

illegal immigration issue and send in the national guard to protect against a yearly

caravan of illegals making the trek from Latin America into the U.S.

To which Brown instead of complying to make our nation a safer place, wanted to make sure

the troops wouldn't be there to stop illegals from coming, but to instead just make sure

that when they come in they have a safe experience.

But the good news is according to an article on American News Daily all these shenanigans

from the Democrats in California are finally starting to take its toll on the state's

citizens.

It looks as though after constantly trying the same thing over and over again they have

finally started to wake up and realize things don't need to be this way.

In fact, a Republican running for Governor might actually have a prayer of winning this

year, or at least coming close to it, which is a huge victory in the eyes of any person

on the right stuck trying to live in the liberal mecca of California.Here is what Former Speaker

of the House Newt Gingrich had to say about the California Governer's race via SF Gate:

"Former Speaker of the House and 2012 presidential candidate Newt Gingrich thinks that California

could elect a Republican governor in 2018.

In a Fox News op-ed titled "California may elect a Republican governor — Incredible

as that sounds," Gingrich writes that GOP candidate John Cox is "within striking distance"

of front runner Gavin Newsom.

Gingrich cites a recent Public Policy Institute of California poll that found that Cox has

surged into second place behind Newsom, and notes that a quarter of the poll's participants

were undecided.

Cox trails Newsom 28 percent to 14 percent, but a second-place finish in the June 5 primary

would guarantee that Cox moves on to face Newsom in a one-on-one race in November.

California's primary system is unconventional, with every candidate regardless of party affiliation

appearing on the same ballot in June.

The top two finishers then move on to the general election in November, meaning that

it is possible for two Democrats to run against each other.

Gingrich calls California's primary process a "great system for silencing and drowning

out political minorities," and states that "it has likely been a big help to California

Democrats since it was adopted in 2010."

(No Republican has won statewide office in California since 2006).

The three Republican candidates for governor: State Assemblyman Travis Allen, businessman

John Cox and former Congressman Doug Ose.

The former house speaker likes Cox's odds against Newsom in a one-on-one race, since

he believes that California would "clearly" benefit from Cox's conservative leadership.

"Cox would work to cut state taxes so that Californians would see more take-home pay

and small businesses would be more able to grow, succeed, expand and create more jobs,"

Gingrich writes.

"This includes the hugely unpopular gasoline tax that the Democratic California Legislature

and Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown imposed on drivers last year."

Gingrich believes that Cox can win on the issue of immigration, writing, "Democratic

leadership has also made California a haven for criminals who are in the country illegally.

Cox has pledged to end California's lawless sanctuary policies and work with federal officials

to get those who are in the country illegally and committing crimes off the streets and

out of the country."

Gingrich doesn't use any poll numbers or raw data to support these claims, but an LA

Times/USC Dornsife poll from 2017 did find that a majority of Californians want to see

the gas tax repealed.

On the issue of immigration however, the same poll found that a majority of Californians

support California's sanctuary state law.

Gingrich also notes how important it is for the national GOP to have a Republican candidate

for governor on the ballot in November.

He cites a SmithJohnson Research survey that found that 99.6 percent of Californians said

they planned to vote in the June primary, but only 56.1 percent of these voters would

vote in November if there were two Democrats on ballot for governor.

Low turnout could doom GOP candidates in tightly-contested local races.

Gingrich writes, "Republicans currently hold only 14 of California's 53 House seats,

all of which will be on the ballot this November.

Any losses or gains in California could have a serious impact on the ability of Republicans

to keep control of the House."

In other words, Cox's performance in June could help determine who controls the House

of Representatives in 2019."

We'll see how this plays out during the summer and the months leading up to the election,

but for the meantime, at least there is some hope in a state that just two short years

ago was considered an instant loss for Republicans.

For more infomation >> FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's 'Charade' After They Refused Orders - Duration: 6:02.

-------------------------------------------

Rustic Stuff Home Fantasies for a Couple in California - Duration: 2:04.

Rustic Stuff Home Fantasies for a Couple in California

For more infomation >> Rustic Stuff Home Fantasies for a Couple in California - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's 'Charade' After They Refused Orders - Duration: 5:19.

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's 'Charade' After They Refused Orders

After decades of giving Democrats free reign of California, it's starting to seem like

the American residents have finally had enough of the unmitigated disaster said politicians

have turned the once Golden State into.

While the whole state is falling apart with it's out of control homelessness, gas prices

that more than double the national average and streets that look like something out of

a third world ghetto in major cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Sacramento

the governor of the state, Jerry Brown, chooses to battle President Trump's attempt at securing

our borders instead of fixing what California citizens have to deal with on a daily basis.

Last month President Trump asked the governors of border states to help address the severe

illegal immigration issue and send in the national guard to protect against a yearly

caravan of illegals making the trek from Latin America into the U.S.

To which Brown instead of complying to make our nation a safer place, wanted to make sure

the troops wouldn't be there to stop illegals from coming, but to instead just make sure

that when they come in they have a safe experience.

But the good news is according to an article on American News Daily all these shenanigans

from the Democrats in California are finally starting to take its toll on the state's

citizens.

It looks as though after constantly trying the same thing over and over again they have

finally started to wake up and realize things don't need to be this way.

In fact, a Republican running for Governor might actually have a prayer of winning this

year, or at least coming close to it, which is a huge victory in the eyes of any person

on the right stuck trying to live in the liberal mecca of California.

Here is what Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich had to say about the California Governer's

race via SF Gate:

"Former Speaker of the House and 2012 presidential candidate Newt Gingrich thinks that California

could elect a Republican governor in 2018.

In a Fox News op-ed titled "California may elect a Republican governor — Incredible

as that sounds," Gingrich writes that GOP candidate John Cox is "within striking distance"

of front runner Gavin Newsom.

Gingrich cites a recent Public Policy Institute of California poll that found that Cox has

surged into second place behind Newsom, and notes that a quarter of the poll's participants

were undecided.

Cox trails Newsom 28 percent to 14 percent, but a second-place finish in the June 5 primary

would guarantee that Cox moves on to face Newsom in a one-on-one race in November.

California's primary system is unconventional, with every candidate regardless of party affiliation

appearing on the same ballot in June.

The top two finishers then move on to the general election in November, meaning that

it is possible for two Democrats to run against each other.

Gingrich calls California's primary process a "great system for silencing and drowning

out political minorities," and states that "it has likely been a big help to California

Democrats since it was adopted in 2010."

(No Republican has won statewide office in California since 2006).

The three Republican candidates for governor: State Assemblyman Travis Allen, businessman

John Cox and former Congressman Doug Ose.

The former house speaker likes Cox's odds against Newsom in a one-on-one race, since

he believes that California would "clearly" benefit from Cox's conservative leadership.

"Cox would work to cut state taxes so that Californians would see more take-home pay

and small businesses would be more able to grow, succeed, expand and create more jobs,"

Gingrich writes.

"This includes the hugely unpopular gasoline tax that the Democratic California Legislature

and Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown imposed on drivers last year."

Gingrich believes that Cox can win on the issue of immigration, writing, "Democratic

leadership has also made California a haven for criminals who are in the country illegally.

Cox has pledged to end California's lawless sanctuary policies and work with federal officials

to get those who are in the country illegally and committing crimes off the streets and

out of the country."

Gingrich doesn't use any poll numbers or raw data to support these claims, but an LA

Times/USC Dornsife poll from 2017 did find that a majority of Californians want to see

the gas tax repealed.

On the issue of immigration however, the same poll found that a majority of Californians

support California's sanctuary state law.

Gingrich also notes how important it is for the national GOP to have a Republican candidate

for governor on the ballot in November.

He cites a SmithJohnson Research survey that found that 99.6 percent of Californians said

they planned to vote in the June primary, but only 56.1 percent of these voters would

vote in November if there were two Democrats on ballot for governor.

Low turnout could doom GOP candidates in tightly-contested local races.

Gingrich writes, "Republicans currently hold only 14 of California's 53 House seats,

all of which will be on the ballot this November.

Any losses or gains in California could have a serious impact on the ability of Republicans

to keep control of the House."

In other words, Cox's performance in June could help determine who controls the House

of Representatives in 2019."

We'll see how this plays out during the summer and the months leading up to the election,

but for the meantime, at least there is some hope in a state that just two short years

ago was considered an instant loss for Republicans.

For more infomation >> FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's 'Charade' After They Refused Orders - Duration: 5:19.

-------------------------------------------

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's Charade After They Refused Orders - Duration: 5:44.

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's Charade After They Refused Orders.

After decades of giving Democrats free reign of California, it's starting to seem like

the American residents have finally had enough of the unmitigated disaster, said politicians

have turned the once Golden State into.

While the whole state is falling apart with it's out of control homelessness, gas prices

that more than double the national average, and streets that look like something out of

a third world ghetto in major cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Sacramento

the governor of the state, Jerry Brown, chooses to battle President Trump's attempt at securing

our borders instead of fixing, what California citizens have to deal with on a daily basis.

Last month President Trump asked the governors of border states to help address the severe

illegal immigration issue, and send in the national guard to protect against a yearly

caravan of illegals making, the trek from Latin America into the U.S.

To which Brown instead of complying to make our nation a safer place, wanted to make sure

the troops wouldn't be there to stop illegals from coming, but to instead just make sure

that when they come in they have a safe experience.

But the good news is according to an article on American News Daily, all these shenanigans

from the Democrats in California are finally starting to take its toll on the state's

citizens.

It looks as though after constantly trying the same thing over, and over again they have

finally started to wake up and realize things don't need to be this way.

In fact, a Republican running for Governor might actually have a prayer of winning this

year, or at least coming close to it, which is a huge victory in the eyes of any person

on the right stuck trying to live in the liberal mecca of California.

Here is what Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich had to say about the California Governer's

race via SF Gate:

"Former Speaker of the House and 2012 presidential candidate Newt Gingrich thinks, that California

could elect a Republican governor in 2018.

In a Fox News op-ed titled "California may elect a Republican governor Incredible as

that sounds," Gingrich writes that GOP candidate John Cox is "within striking distance"

of front runner Gavin Newsom.

Gingrich cites a recent Public Policy Institute of California poll that found, that Cox has

surged into second place behind Newsom, and notes that a quarter of the poll's participants

were undecided.

Cox trails Newsom 28 percent to 14 percent, but a second-place finish in the June 5 primary

would guarantee that Cox moves, on to face Newsom in a one-on-one race in November.

California's primary system is unconventional, with every candidate regardless of party affiliation

appearing on the same ballot in June.

The top two finishers then move on to the general election in November, meaning that

it is possible for two Democrats to run against each other.

Gingrich calls California's primary process a "great system for silencing and drowning

out political minorities," and states that "it has likely been a big help to California

Democrats since it was adopted in 2010."

(No Republican has won statewide office in California since 2006).

The three Republican candidates for governor: State Assemblyman Travis Allen, businessman

John Cox and former Congressman Doug Ose.

The former house speaker likes Cox's odds against Newsom in a one-on-one race, since

he believes that California would "clearly" benefit from Cox's conservative leadership.

"Cox would work to cut state taxes so that Californians would see more take-home pay,

and small businesses would be more able to grow, succeed, expand and create more jobs,"

Gingrich writes.

"This includes the hugely unpopular gasoline tax that the Democratic California Legislature,

and Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown imposed on drivers last year."

Gingrich believes that Cox can win on the issue of immigration, writing, "Democratic

leadership has also made California a haven for criminals who are in the country illegally.

Cox has pledged to end California's lawless sanctuary policies, and work with federal

officials to get those who are in the country illegally and committing crimes off the streets

and out of the country."

Gingrich doesn't use any poll numbers or raw data to support these claims, but an LA

Times USC Dornsife poll from 2017 did find that a majority of Californians want to see

the gas tax repealed.

On the issue of immigration however, the same poll found that a majority of Californians

support California's sanctuary state law.

Gingrich also notes how important it is for the national GOP to have a Republican candidate

for governor on the ballot in November.

He cites a SmithJohnson Research survey that found that 99.6 percent of Californians said

they planned to vote in the June primary, but only 56.1 percent of these voters would

vote in November if there were two Democrats on ballot for governor.

Low turnout could doom GOP candidates in tightly-contested local races.

Gingrich writes, "Republicans currently hold only 14 of California's 53 House seats,

all of which will be on the ballot this November.

Any losses or gains in California could have a serious impact, on the ability of Republicans

to keep control of the House."

In other words, Cox's performance in June could help determine who controls the House

of Representatives in 2019."

We'll see how this plays out during the summer and the months leading up to the election,

but for the meantime, at least there is some hope in a state that just two short years

ago was considered an instant loss for Republicans.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's Charade After They Refused Orders - Duration: 5:44.

-------------------------------------------

California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity - Duration: 4:14.

California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity

A pro-LGBTQ bill in California could lead to the elimination of free speech, and it

could even ban one of the oldest books in the world, the Bible.

The law would target Christians in a way that only communist regimes have in the past.

In what should be a surprise to no one, it has the support of many Democrats in the Golden

State.

California Assembly Bill 2943 says that "contemporary science recognizes that being lesbian, gay,

bisexual, or transgender is part of the natural spectrum of human identity and is not a disease,

disorder, or illness."

And, if passed, the bill would make it "an unlawful practice prohibited under the Consumer

Legal Remedies Act, advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation

change efforts with an individual."

That means that it is conceivable that a priest, or a Muslim Imam, would be committing a crime

if they taught what their respective religions teach about homosexuality.

It would literally be a crime for them to do their job and preach their religion.

The law cites a report from the American Psychiatric Association published in 2000 that "advises

parents, guardians, young people, and their families to avoid sexual orientation change

efforts that portray homosexuality as a mental illness or developmental disorder and to seek

psychotherapy, social support, and educational services that provide accurate information

on sexual orientation and sexuality, increase family and school support, and reduce rejection

of sexual minority youth."

In other words, if you have a kid who is a male and that kid puts on a dress and declares

that he is a woman, you are supposed to treat that as normal.

What if your child climbs to the top of the house, stands on the roof, and declares that

he is an airplane?

Are you supposed to allow him to jump because daring to think that he could possibly have

a mental issue if he believes that he is something he isn't is verboten?

The bill is even more draconian than it seems on the surface, and on the surface, it seems

pretty draconian.

The bill bans "the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer" of any book

or publication that has "advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation

change efforts with an individual."

That means if a church or mosque were to sell a book that tells you to fight homosexual

urges, that book could be banned.

If the religious institution did sell the book, it could be committing a crime.

It bans any publication that says that homosexuality is a sin, and that could lead to a banning

of the Bible.

Randy Thomasson of SaveCalifornia.com wrote that the law could overreach into areas of

banning free speech that people like Joseph Stalin championed.

It could become so pervasive that it bans the practice of religion in the state.

"So, this is a pastor speaking, you pay a ticket to hear him speak.

He speaks about overcoming same-sex desires.

Hey, that could be outlawed.

A church sells a book about overcoming same-sex desires.

There's a sale, there's a transaction, that could be banned," Thomasson told CBN

News.

"This is very expansive, very tyrannical and absolutely squashing free speech, religious

freedom and basic choice of people.

This is an anti-freedom, anti-American bill," he said.

The bill says it is needed because "California has a compelling interest in protecting the

physical and psychological well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals."

But what about the freedom of religion of Californians that is enshrined in the Constitution

of the United States?

Is it not enough for Commiefornia that it has infringed on the right to bear arms of

its state residents?

Does it need to infringe on its citizens' First Amendment rights too?

For more infomation >> California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity - Duration: 4:14.

-------------------------------------------

California To Ban the Sale of Bibles? - Duration: 5:02.

California To Ban the Sale of Bibles?

When you think about the censorship and outright banning of books and opinions, do you imagine

the United States of America?

Or, more likely, does that kind of suppression strike you more as the tactics of communists

or fascists that America has frequently fought against?

If liberal lawmakers in California get their way, that west coast state may be one step

closer to being unrecognizable as part of the United States.

A bill currently pending in the legislature would essentially ban the sale of books that

include traditional Christian views on marriage and sexuality.

Shockingly, the proposed law could even be construed to make it illegal to sell Bibles,

since they include verses that the far left finds unacceptable.

"Assembly Bill 2943 would make it an 'unlawful business practice' to engage in 'a transaction

intended to result or that results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any

consumer' that advertise, offer to engage in, or do engage in 'sexual orientation

change efforts with an individual,'" explained National Review.

That's a lot of legalese to digest, so let's break it down.

What the bill basically says is that anything that can be seen as trying to impact a person's

sexual orientation would be illegal to sell or offer.

This would almost certainly include traditional Christian counseling services and books.

"The bill then defines 'sexual orientation change efforts' as 'any practices that

seek to change an individual's sexual orientation.

This includes efforts to change behaviors or gender expressions, or to eliminate or

reduce sexual or romantic attractions or feelings toward individuals of the same sex," continued

National Review.

"Efforts to change behaviors" is where the real problem is.

After all, almost all counseling and even common psychiatric care are intended to "change

behaviors" in various ways.

If you think about it, that's the entire reason people seek help in the first place:

They want to stop drinking or becoming angry or, yes, having troubling thoughts about their

sexuality.

It's also worth pointing out that the bill as written would apply to people who are trying

to change their own behavior.

This would mean that if a person was struggling with same-sex behavior or sexual identity

and they themselves wanted to change, it would be illegal for them to buy any book meant

to help them with this.

The problem here isn't limited to Christian books.

Bizarrely, the bill appears to put almost any counseling or psychiatric service in the

cross-hairs.

For example, let's say a man has the paraphilia of crossdressing or transvestism.

For whatever reason, the person has become addicted to wearing women's clothes and

has found that showing up to work in high heels and a dress has a negative impact on

his life.

Setting aside any personal judgment about this lifestyle choice (how liberal of us),

suppose he voluntarily seeks counseling to get a handle on this problem.

Maybe he just wants to stop being addicted to cross-dressing in public.

It's his own choice.

Yet counselors or books intended to help him would be illegal because they're "efforts

to change behaviors or gender expressions," in the words of the proposed law.

You might consider that example silly, but this concern is rather serious: If passed,

it could only be a matter of time before the law's extremely vague wording is used against

traditional Christian teachings in the Bible.

Take Romans 1:26-27, for instance.

This verse calls out homosexuality as "shameful" and encourages Christians to not act in this

way.

Then there are 1 Peter 1:15-17, Romans 6:1, and Ephesians 4:22-24, all of which direct

followers of Christianity to abstain from homosexuality even if they have those desires.

Let's be extremely clear: The point of this article is not to lecture about gay lifestyles.

There are an increasing number of gay conservatives who have reached their own conclusions about

their beliefs, and many are on the front lines of the culture war.

You don't even have to particularly agree with the Bible verses mentioned here to see

the problem.

Efforts like the proposed bill represent dangerous slippery slopes that would use the legislature

to attack traditional beliefs, and even mainstream views that happen to be at odds with the far-left

agenda.

If nothing else, it's an affront to the free exchange of ideas — yes, even ones

that someone might dislike — and a censorship of speech.

"No one doubts that (Christianity's) teachings on sexual morality are increasingly unpopular,"

summarized National Review.

"But they remain constitutionally protected, and no state legislature should be permitted

to ban a 'good' (such as a book) or a 'service' (like counseling) that makes

these arguments and provides them to willing, consenting consumers."

It's amazing that the same liberals who bemoan "government in the bedroom" eagerly

jump at the chance to give the same government control over sexual and moral topics the moment

it helps their cause.

Even non-Christians and political moderates need to fight against the new wave of suppression

before a 21st-century iron curtain appears.

Free speech is everyone's fight.

For more infomation >> California To Ban the Sale of Bibles? - Duration: 5:02.

-------------------------------------------

California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity - Duration: 4:02.

California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity.

A pro-LGBTQ bill in California could lead to the elimination of free speech, and it

could even ban one of the oldest books in the world, the Bible.

The law would target Christians in a way that only communist regimes have in the past.

In what should be a surprise to no one, it has the support of many Democrats in the Golden

State.

California Assembly Bill 2943 says that "contemporary science recognizes that being lesbian, gay,

bisexual, or transgender is part of the natural spectrum of human identity and is not a disease,

disorder, or illness."

And, if passed, the bill would make it "an unlawful practice prohibited under the Consumer

Legal Remedies Act, advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation

change efforts with an individual."

That means that it is conceivable that a priest, or a Muslim Imam, would be committing a crime

if they taught what their respective religions teach about homosexuality.

It would literally be a crime for them to do their job and preach their religion.

The law cites a report from the American Psychiatric Association published in 2000 that "advises

parents, guardians, young people, and their families to avoid sexual orientation change

efforts that portray homosexuality as a mental illness, or developmental disorder and to

seek psychotherapy, social support, and educational services that provide accurate information

on sexual orientation and sexuality, increase family and school support, and reduce rejection

of sexual minority youth."

In other words, if you have a kid who is a male and that kid puts on a dress and declares

that he is a woman, you are supposed to treat that as normal.

What if your child climbs to the top of the house, stands on the roof, and declares that

he is an airplane?

Are you supposed to allow him to jump because daring to think, that he could possibly have

a mental issue if he believes that he is something he isn't is verboten?

The bill is even more draconian than it seems on the surface, and on the surface, it seems

pretty draconian.

The bill bans "the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer" of any book

or publication that has "advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation

change efforts with an individual."

That means if a church or mosque were to sell a book that tells you to fight homosexual

urges, that book could be banned.

If the religious institution did sell the book, it could be committing a crime.

It bans any publication that says that homosexuality is a sin, and that could lead to a banning

of the Bible.

Randy Thomasson of SaveCalifornia.com wrote that the law could overreach into areas of

banning free speech, that people like Joseph Stalin championed.

It could become so pervasive that it bans the practice of religion in the state.

"So, this is a pastor speaking, you pay a ticket to hear him speak.

He speaks about overcoming same-sex desires.

Hey, that could be outlawed.

A church sells a book about overcoming same-sex desires.

There's a sale, there's a transaction, that could be banned," Thomasson told CBN

News.

"This is very expansive, very tyrannical and absolutely squashing free speech, religious

freedom and basic choice of people.

This is an anti-freedom, anti-American bill," he said.

The bill says it is needed because "California has a compelling interest in protecting the

physical and psychological well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals."

But what about the freedom of religion of Californians that is enshrined in the Constitution

of the United States?

Is it not enough for Commiefornia that it has infringed on the right to bear arms of

its state residents?

Does it need to infringe on its citizens First Amendment rights too?

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.