Thứ Tư, 5 tháng 12, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Dec 5 2018

Seoul and Washington announced they will confirm whether or not they're suspending next year's

joint military drills by the start of December.

Right now, it looks like the allies have not made up their minds yet.

Our defense ministry correspondent Park Ji-won fills us in on the latest.

The U.S. Department of Defense says South Korea and the U.S. have not yet made their

final decision on next year's joint military exercises.

This is according to a report by Voice of America, citing the Pentagon's spokesperson

for the Indo-Pacific, Christopher Logan.

Logan reportedly stressed that the U.S. will work closely with South Korea in supporting

the ongoing diplomatic process surrounding the Korean Peninsula,... and the allies will

continue to consult to maintain their combat readiness.

The spokesperson also said the Department of Defense is closely examining a range of

aspects of the exercises,... such as their size and scale.

South Korea's Ministry of National Defense also says the two countries are still discussing

the matter.

Responding to a reporter's question on the issue in Tuesday's regular press briefing,...

the ministry's spokesperson said a decision will be announced once it's finalized.

"We said earlier that we will announce it when it's decided.

That position has not changed."

Back in October, in a joint press conference at the annual Security Consultative Meeting

in Washington,...

South Korea's defense minister Jeong Kyeong-doo said a decision would be made by December.

And in late November,...

U.S. defense chief James Mattis says next year's joint military exercise will be smaller

in scope... to avoid hurting diplomatic efforts with North Korea.

Park Ji-won, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> S. Korea and U.S. haven't yet decided on next year's joint military drills: VOA - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump believes second N. Korea-U.S. summit is likely to be productive: Bolton - Duration: 0:46.

US President Donald Trump is said to won a second summit with North Korean leader

Kim jong-un to ensure that Kim makes good on the pledges made at their first

summit back in June speaking at a conference organised by The Wall Street

Journal on Tuesday Trump's national security adviser John Bolton said the

North has not lived up to those commitments yes he said that's why

president drum Trump believes the second summit is likely to be productive Bolton

added that if the north follows through on its promises Trump quote will deserve

the Nobel Peace Prize president Trump has said he expects to

meet Kim in January or February in one of three unspecified locations

For more infomation >> Trump believes second N. Korea-U.S. summit is likely to be productive: Bolton - Duration: 0:46.

-------------------------------------------

Tucker reacts to caravan migrants breaching US border - Duration: 5:43.

For more infomation >> Tucker reacts to caravan migrants breaching US border - Duration: 5:43.

-------------------------------------------

INF Treaty walks U.S., Russia back from a Cold War nuclear showdown - Duration: 2:06.

For more infomation >> INF Treaty walks U.S., Russia back from a Cold War nuclear showdown - Duration: 2:06.

-------------------------------------------

Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order - Duration: 19:03.

SECRETARY POMPEO: Thank you, Ian, for the kind introduction.

Good morning to all of you; thank you for joining me here today.

It's wonderful to be in this beautiful place,

to get a chance to make a set of remarks about the very work that you do,

the issues that confront the Marshall Fund and confront our region as well.

Before I start today with my formal remarks,

it would be – I would be enormously remiss if I did not pay a well-deserved tribute

to America's 41st president, George Herbert Walker Bush.

He was a – many of you know him.

He was an unyielding champion of freedom around the world —

first as a fighter pilot in World War II, later as a congressman.

He was the ambassador to the United Nations, and then an envoy to China.

He then had the same job I had as the director of the CIA

– I did it longer than he did.

He was then the vice president under Ronald Reagan.

I got to know him some myself.

He was a wonderful brother, a father, a grandfather, and a proud American.

Indeed, America is the only country he loved more than Texas. (Laughter.)

I actually think that he would be delighted for me to be here today at an institution

named after a fellow lover of freedom, George Marshall.

And he would have been thrilled to see all of you here,

such a large crowd gathered who are dedicated to transatlantic bonds,

so many decades after they were first forged.

The men who rebuilt Western civilization after World War II,

like my predecessor Secretary Marshall, knew that only strong U.S. leadership,

in concert with our friends and allies,

could unite the sovereign nations all around the globe.

So we underwrote new institutions to rebuild Europe and Japan, to stabilize currencies,

and to facilitate trade.

We all co-founded NATO to guarantee security for ourselves and our allies.

We entered into treaties to codify Western values of freedom and human rights.

Collectively, we convened multilateral organizations to promote peace and cooperation among states.

And we worked hard – indeed, tirelessly – to preserve Western ideals because, as

President Trump made clear in his Warsaw address, each of those are worth preserving.

This American leadership allowed us to enjoy the greatest human flourishing in modern history.

We won the Cold War. We won the peace.

With no small measure of George H. W. Bush's effort, we reunited Germany.

This is the type of leadership that President Trump is boldly reasserting.

After the Cold War ended, we allowed this liberal order to begin to corrode.

It failed us in some places, and sometimes it failed you and the rest of the world.

Multilateralism has too often become viewed as an end unto itself.

The more treaties we sign, the safer we supposedly are.

The more bureaucrats we have, the better the job gets done.

Was that ever really true?

The central question that we face is that –

is the question of whether the system as currently configured, as it exists today,

and as the world exists today – does it work?

Does it work for all the people of the world?

Today at the United Nations, peacekeeping missions drag on for decades, no closer to peace.

The UN's climate-related treaties are viewed by some nations as simply a vehicle to redistribute wealth.

Anti-Israel bias has been institutionalized.

Regional powers collude to vote the likes of Cuba and Venezuela onto the Human Rights Council.

The UN was founded as an organization that welcomed peace-loving nations.

I ask: Today, does it continue to serve its mission faithfully?

In the Western Hemisphere, has enough been done with the Organization of American States

to promote its four pillars of democracy, human rights, security, and economic development

in a region that includes the likes of Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua?

In Africa, does the African Union advance the mutual interest of its nation-state members?

For the business community, from which I came, consider this: The World Bank and the International

Monetary Fund were chartered to help rebuild war- torn territories and promote private investment

and growth. Today, these institutions often counsel countries who have mismanaged

their economic affairs to impose austerity measures

that inhibit growth and crowd out private sector actors.

Here in Brussels, the European Union and its predecessors have delivered a great deal of

prosperity to the entire continent. Europe is America's single largest trading partner,

and we benefit enormously from your success.

But Brexit – if nothing else – was a political wake-up call.

Is the EU ensuring that the interests of countries and their citizens

are placed before those of bureaucrats here in Brussels?

These are valid questions.

This leads to my next point:

Bad actors have exploited our lack of leadership for their own gain.

This is the poisoned fruit of American retreat.

President Trump is determined to reverse that.

China's economic development did not lead to an embrace of democracy and regional stability;

it led to more political repression and regional provocations.

We welcomed China into the liberal order, but never policed its behavior.

China has routinely exploited loopholes in the World Trade Organization rules,

imposed market restrictions, forced technology transfers, and stolen intellectual property.

And it knows that world opinion is powerless to stop its Orwellian human rights violations.

Iran didn't join the community of nations after the nuclear deal was inked;

it spread its newfound riches to terrorists and to dictators.

Tehran holds multiple American hostages, and Bob Levinson has been missing there

for 11 years.

Iran has blatantly disregarded UN Security Council resolutions,

lied to the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors about its nuclear program,

and evaded UN sanctions.

Just this past week, Iran test fired a ballistic missile, in violation of UN Security Council

Resolution 2231.

Earlier this year, Tehran used the U.S.-Iran Treaty of Amity to bring baseless claims

against the United States before the International Court of Justice –

most all of this malign activity during the JCPOA.

Russia. Russia hasn't embraced Western values of freedom and international cooperation.

Rather, it has suppressed opposition voices and invaded the sovereign nations of Georgia

and of Ukraine.

Moscow has also deployed a military-grade nerve agent on foreign soil,

right here in Europe, in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention to which it is a party.

And as I'll detail later today, Russia has violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

for many years.

The list goes on. We have to account for the world order of today in order to chart the

way forward. It is what America's National Security Strategy deemed "principled realism."

I like to think of it as "common sense."

Every nation – every nation – must honestly acknowledge its responsibilities to its citizens

and ask if the current international order serves the good of its people as well as it could.

And if not, we must ask how we can right it.

This is what President Trump is doing. He is returning the United States to its traditional,

central leadership role in the world. He sees the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.

He knows that nothing can replace the nation-state as the guarantor of democratic freedoms and

national interests. He knows, as George H.W. Bush knew, that a safer world has consistently

demanded American courage on the world stage. And when we – and when we all of us ignore

our responsibilities to the institutions we've formed, others will abuse them.

Critics in places like Iran and China – who really are undermining the international order

– are saying the Trump administration is the reason this system is breaking down.

They claim America is acting unilaterally instead of multilaterally, as if every kind of multilateral

action is by definition desirable.

Even our European friends sometimes say we're not acting in the world's interest.

This is just plain wrong.

Our mission is to reassert our sovereignty, reform the liberal international order, and

we want our friends to help us and to exert their sovereignty as well. We aspire to make

the international order serve our citizens – not to control them. America intends to

lead – now and always.

Under President Trump, we are not abandoning international leadership or our friends in

the international system. Indeed, quite the contrary. Just look, as one example, at the

historic number of countries which have gotten on board our pressure campaign against North

Korea. No other nation in the world could have rallied dozens of nations, from every

corner of the world, to impose sanctions on the regime in Pyongyang.

International bodies must help facilitate cooperation that bolsters the security and

values of the free world, or they must be reformed or eliminated.

When treaties are broken, the violators must be confronted, and the treaties must be fixed

or discarded. Words should mean something.

Our administration is thus lawfully exiting or renegotiating outdated or harmful treaties,

trade agreements, and other international arrangements that do not serve our sovereign

interests, or the interests of our allies.

We announced our intent to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change, absent

better terms for the United States. The current pact would've siphoned money from American

paychecks and enriched polluters like China.

In America, we've found a better solution – we think a better solution for the world.

We've unleashed our energy companies to innovate and compete, and our carbon emissions

have declined dramatically.

We changed course from the Iran deal, because of, among other things, Tehran's violent

and destabilizing activities, which undermined the spirit of the deal and put the safety

of American people and our allies at risk. In its place, we are leading our allies to

constrain Iran's revolutionary ambitions and end Iran's campaigns of global terrorism.

And we needn't a new bureaucracy to do it. We need to continue to develop a coalition

which will achieve that outcome which will keep people in the Middle East, in Europe,

and the entire world safe from the threat from Iran.

America renegotiated our treaty, NAFTA, to advance the interests of the American worker.

President Trump proudly signed the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement at the G20 this past weekend in

Buenos Aires, and on Friday will submit it to the Congress, a body accountable to the

American people.

The new agreement also includes renegotiation provisions, because no trade agreement is

permanently suited to all times.

We have encouraged our G20 partners to reform the WTO, and they took a good first step in

Buenos Aires this last week.

I spoke earlier about the World Bank and the IMF. The Trump Administration is working to

refocus these institutions on policies that promote economic prosperity, pushing to halt

lending to nations that can already access global capital markets – countries like

China – and pressing to reduce taxpayer handouts to development banks that are perfectly

capable of raising private capital on their own.

We're also taking leadership, real action to stop rogue international courts, like the

International Criminal Court, from trampling on our sovereignty – your sovereignty – and

all of our freedoms. The ICC's Office of the Prosecutor is trying to open an investigation

into U.S. personnel in connection with the war in Afghanistan. We will take all necessary

steps to protect our people, those of our NATO allies who fight alongside of us inside

of Afghanistan from unjust prosecution. Because we know that if it can happen to our people,

it can happen to yours too. It is a worthy question: Does the court continue to serve

its original intended purpose?

The first two years of the Trump administration demonstrate that President Trump is not undermining

these institutions, nor is he abandoning American leadership. Quite the opposite. In the finest

traditions of our great democracy, we are rallying the noble nations of the world to

build a new liberal order that prevents war and achieves greater prosperity for all.

We're supporting institutions that we believe can be improved; institutions that work in

American interests – and yours – in service of our shared values.

For example, here in Belgium in 1973, banks from 15 countries formed SWIFT to develop

common standards for cross-border payments, and it's now an integral part of our global

financial infrastructure.

SWIFT recently disconnected sanctioned Iranian banks from its platform because of the unacceptable

risk they pose to a system – to the system as a whole. This is an excellent example of

American leadership working alongside an international institution to act responsibly.

Another example: the Proliferation Security Initiative, formed by 11 nations under the

Bush administration to stop trafficking in weapons of mass destruction. It has since

grown organically to 105 countries and has undoubtedly made the world safer.

And I can't forget, standing here, one of the most important international institutions

of them all – which will continue to thrive with American leadership. My very first trip,

within hours of having been sworn in as a secretary of state, I traveled here to visit

with our NATO allies. I'll repeat this morning what I said then – this is an indispensable

institution. President Trump wants everyone to pay their fair share so we can deter our

enemies and defend people – the people of our countries.

To that end, all NATO allies should work to strengthen what is already the greatest military

alliance in all of history.

Never – never – has an alliance ever been so powerful or so peaceful, and our historic

ties must continue.

To that end, I'm pleased to announce that I will host my foreign minister colleagues

for a meeting in Washington next April, where we will mark NATO's 70th anniversary.

As my remarks come to a close, I want to repeat what George Marshall told the UN General Assembly

back near the time of its formation in 1948. He said, quote, "International organizations

cannot take the place of national and personal effort or of local and individual imagination;

international action cannot replace self-help." End of quote.

Sometimes it's not popular to buck the status quo, to call out that which we all see but

sometimes refuse to speak about. But frankly, too much is at stake for all of us in this

room today not to do so. This is the reality that President Trump so viscerally understands.

Just as George Marshall's generation gave life to a new vision for a safe and free world,

so we call on you to have the same kind of boldness. Our call is especially urgent – especially

urgent in light of the threats we face from powerful countries and actors whose ambition

is to reshape the international order in its own illiberal image.

Let's work together. Let's work together to preserve the free world so that it continues

to serve the interests of the people to whom we each are accountable.

Let's do so in a way that creates international organizations that are agile, that respect

national sovereignty, that deliver on their stated missions, and that create value for

the liberal order and for the world.

President Trump understands deeply that when America leads, peace and prosperity almost

certainly follow.

He knows that if America and our allies here in Europe don't lead, others will choose

to do so.

America will, as it has always done, continue to work with our allies around the world towards

the peaceful, liberal order each citizen of the world deserves.

Thank you for joining me here today. May the Good Lord bless each and every one of you.

Thank you. (Applause.)

For more infomation >> Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order - Duration: 19:03.

-------------------------------------------

FULL TUESDAY COVERAGE: President George H.W. Bush Lies In State - Duration: 10:40:13.

For more infomation >> FULL TUESDAY COVERAGE: President George H.W. Bush Lies In State - Duration: 10:40:13.

-------------------------------------------

Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order - Duration: 19:03.

SECRETARY POMPEO: Thank you, Ian, for the kind introduction.

Good morning to all of you; thank you for joining me here today.

It's wonderful to be in this beautiful place,

to get a chance to make a set of remarks about the very work that you do,

the issues that confront the Marshall Fund and confront our region as well.

Before I start today with my formal remarks,

it would be – I would be enormously remiss if I did not pay a well-deserved tribute

to America's 41st president, George Herbert Walker Bush.

He was a – many of you know him.

He was an unyielding champion of freedom around the world —

first as a fighter pilot in World War II, later as a congressman.

He was the ambassador to the United Nations, and then an envoy to China.

He then had the same job I had as the director of the CIA

– I did it longer than he did.

He was then the vice president under Ronald Reagan.

I got to know him some myself.

He was a wonderful brother, a father, a grandfather, and a proud American.

Indeed, America is the only country he loved more than Texas. (Laughter.)

I actually think that he would be delighted for me to be here today at an institution

named after a fellow lover of freedom, George Marshall.

And he would have been thrilled to see all of you here,

such a large crowd gathered who are dedicated to transatlantic bonds,

so many decades after they were first forged.

The men who rebuilt Western civilization after World War II,

like my predecessor Secretary Marshall, knew that only strong U.S. leadership,

in concert with our friends and allies,

could unite the sovereign nations all around the globe.

So we underwrote new institutions to rebuild Europe and Japan, to stabilize currencies,

and to facilitate trade.

We all co-founded NATO to guarantee security for ourselves and our allies.

We entered into treaties to codify Western values of freedom and human rights.

Collectively, we convened multilateral organizations to promote peace and cooperation among states.

And we worked hard – indeed, tirelessly – to preserve Western ideals because, as

President Trump made clear in his Warsaw address, each of those are worth preserving.

This American leadership allowed us to enjoy the greatest human flourishing in modern history.

We won the Cold War. We won the peace.

With no small measure of George H. W. Bush's effort, we reunited Germany.

This is the type of leadership that President Trump is boldly reasserting.

After the Cold War ended, we allowed this liberal order to begin to corrode.

It failed us in some places, and sometimes it failed you and the rest of the world.

Multilateralism has too often become viewed as an end unto itself.

The more treaties we sign, the safer we supposedly are.

The more bureaucrats we have, the better the job gets done.

Was that ever really true?

The central question that we face is that –

is the question of whether the system as currently configured, as it exists today,

and as the world exists today – does it work?

Does it work for all the people of the world?

Today at the United Nations, peacekeeping missions drag on for decades, no closer to peace.

The UN's climate-related treaties are viewed by some nations as simply a vehicle to redistribute wealth.

Anti-Israel bias has been institutionalized.

Regional powers collude to vote the likes of Cuba and Venezuela onto the Human Rights Council.

The UN was founded as an organization that welcomed peace-loving nations.

I ask: Today, does it continue to serve its mission faithfully?

In the Western Hemisphere, has enough been done with the Organization of American States

to promote its four pillars of democracy, human rights, security, and economic development

in a region that includes the likes of Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua?

In Africa, does the African Union advance the mutual interest of its nation-state members?

For the business community, from which I came, consider this: The World Bank and the International

Monetary Fund were chartered to help rebuild war- torn territories and promote private investment

and growth. Today, these institutions often counsel countries who have mismanaged

their economic affairs to impose austerity measures

that inhibit growth and crowd out private sector actors.

Here in Brussels, the European Union and its predecessors have delivered a great deal of

prosperity to the entire continent. Europe is America's single largest trading partner,

and we benefit enormously from your success.

But Brexit – if nothing else – was a political wake-up call.

Is the EU ensuring that the interests of countries and their citizens

are placed before those of bureaucrats here in Brussels?

These are valid questions.

This leads to my next point:

Bad actors have exploited our lack of leadership for their own gain.

This is the poisoned fruit of American retreat.

President Trump is determined to reverse that.

China's economic development did not lead to an embrace of democracy and regional stability;

it led to more political repression and regional provocations.

We welcomed China into the liberal order, but never policed its behavior.

China has routinely exploited loopholes in the World Trade Organization rules,

imposed market restrictions, forced technology transfers, and stolen intellectual property.

And it knows that world opinion is powerless to stop its Orwellian human rights violations.

Iran didn't join the community of nations after the nuclear deal was inked;

it spread its newfound riches to terrorists and to dictators.

Tehran holds multiple American hostages, and Bob Levinson has been missing there

for 11 years.

Iran has blatantly disregarded UN Security Council resolutions,

lied to the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors about its nuclear program,

and evaded UN sanctions.

Just this past week, Iran test fired a ballistic missile, in violation of UN Security Council

Resolution 2231.

Earlier this year, Tehran used the U.S.-Iran Treaty of Amity to bring baseless claims

against the United States before the International Court of Justice –

most all of this malign activity during the JCPOA.

Russia. Russia hasn't embraced Western values of freedom and international cooperation.

Rather, it has suppressed opposition voices and invaded the sovereign nations of Georgia

and of Ukraine.

Moscow has also deployed a military-grade nerve agent on foreign soil,

right here in Europe, in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention to which it is a party.

And as I'll detail later today, Russia has violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

for many years.

The list goes on. We have to account for the world order of today in order to chart the

way forward. It is what America's National Security Strategy deemed "principled realism."

I like to think of it as "common sense."

Every nation – every nation – must honestly acknowledge its responsibilities to its citizens

and ask if the current international order serves the good of its people as well as it could.

And if not, we must ask how we can right it.

This is what President Trump is doing. He is returning the United States to its traditional,

central leadership role in the world. He sees the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.

He knows that nothing can replace the nation-state as the guarantor of democratic freedoms and

national interests. He knows, as George H.W. Bush knew, that a safer world has consistently

demanded American courage on the world stage. And when we – and when we all of us ignore

our responsibilities to the institutions we've formed, others will abuse them.

Critics in places like Iran and China – who really are undermining the international order

– are saying the Trump administration is the reason this system is breaking down.

They claim America is acting unilaterally instead of multilaterally, as if every kind of multilateral

action is by definition desirable.

Even our European friends sometimes say we're not acting in the world's interest.

This is just plain wrong.

Our mission is to reassert our sovereignty, reform the liberal international order, and

we want our friends to help us and to exert their sovereignty as well. We aspire to make

the international order serve our citizens – not to control them. America intends to

lead – now and always.

Under President Trump, we are not abandoning international leadership or our friends in

the international system. Indeed, quite the contrary. Just look, as one example, at the

historic number of countries which have gotten on board our pressure campaign against North

Korea. No other nation in the world could have rallied dozens of nations, from every

corner of the world, to impose sanctions on the regime in Pyongyang.

International bodies must help facilitate cooperation that bolsters the security and

values of the free world, or they must be reformed or eliminated.

When treaties are broken, the violators must be confronted, and the treaties must be fixed

or discarded. Words should mean something.

Our administration is thus lawfully exiting or renegotiating outdated or harmful treaties,

trade agreements, and other international arrangements that do not serve our sovereign

interests, or the interests of our allies.

We announced our intent to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change, absent

better terms for the United States. The current pact would've siphoned money from American

paychecks and enriched polluters like China.

In America, we've found a better solution – we think a better solution for the world.

We've unleashed our energy companies to innovate and compete, and our carbon emissions

have declined dramatically.

We changed course from the Iran deal, because of, among other things, Tehran's violent

and destabilizing activities, which undermined the spirit of the deal and put the safety

of American people and our allies at risk. In its place, we are leading our allies to

constrain Iran's revolutionary ambitions and end Iran's campaigns of global terrorism.

And we needn't a new bureaucracy to do it. We need to continue to develop a coalition

which will achieve that outcome which will keep people in the Middle East, in Europe,

and the entire world safe from the threat from Iran.

America renegotiated our treaty, NAFTA, to advance the interests of the American worker.

President Trump proudly signed the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement at the G20 this past weekend in

Buenos Aires, and on Friday will submit it to the Congress, a body accountable to the

American people.

The new agreement also includes renegotiation provisions, because no trade agreement is

permanently suited to all times.

We have encouraged our G20 partners to reform the WTO, and they took a good first step in

Buenos Aires this last week.

I spoke earlier about the World Bank and the IMF. The Trump Administration is working to

refocus these institutions on policies that promote economic prosperity, pushing to halt

lending to nations that can already access global capital markets – countries like

China – and pressing to reduce taxpayer handouts to development banks that are perfectly

capable of raising private capital on their own.

We're also taking leadership, real action to stop rogue international courts, like the

International Criminal Court, from trampling on our sovereignty – your sovereignty – and

all of our freedoms. The ICC's Office of the Prosecutor is trying to open an investigation

into U.S. personnel in connection with the war in Afghanistan. We will take all necessary

steps to protect our people, those of our NATO allies who fight alongside of us inside

of Afghanistan from unjust prosecution. Because we know that if it can happen to our people,

it can happen to yours too. It is a worthy question: Does the court continue to serve

its original intended purpose?

The first two years of the Trump administration demonstrate that President Trump is not undermining

these institutions, nor is he abandoning American leadership. Quite the opposite. In the finest

traditions of our great democracy, we are rallying the noble nations of the world to

build a new liberal order that prevents war and achieves greater prosperity for all.

We're supporting institutions that we believe can be improved; institutions that work in

American interests – and yours – in service of our shared values.

For example, here in Belgium in 1973, banks from 15 countries formed SWIFT to develop

common standards for cross-border payments, and it's now an integral part of our global

financial infrastructure.

SWIFT recently disconnected sanctioned Iranian banks from its platform because of the unacceptable

risk they pose to a system – to the system as a whole. This is an excellent example of

American leadership working alongside an international institution to act responsibly.

Another example: the Proliferation Security Initiative, formed by 11 nations under the

Bush administration to stop trafficking in weapons of mass destruction. It has since

grown organically to 105 countries and has undoubtedly made the world safer.

And I can't forget, standing here, one of the most important international institutions

of them all – which will continue to thrive with American leadership. My very first trip,

within hours of having been sworn in as a secretary of state, I traveled here to visit

with our NATO allies. I'll repeat this morning what I said then – this is an indispensable

institution. President Trump wants everyone to pay their fair share so we can deter our

enemies and defend people – the people of our countries.

To that end, all NATO allies should work to strengthen what is already the greatest military

alliance in all of history.

Never – never – has an alliance ever been so powerful or so peaceful, and our historic

ties must continue.

To that end, I'm pleased to announce that I will host my foreign minister colleagues

for a meeting in Washington next April, where we will mark NATO's 70th anniversary.

As my remarks come to a close, I want to repeat what George Marshall told the UN General Assembly

back near the time of its formation in 1948. He said, quote, "International organizations

cannot take the place of national and personal effort or of local and individual imagination;

international action cannot replace self-help." End of quote.

Sometimes it's not popular to buck the status quo, to call out that which we all see but

sometimes refuse to speak about. But frankly, too much is at stake for all of us in this

room today not to do so. This is the reality that President Trump so viscerally understands.

Just as George Marshall's generation gave life to a new vision for a safe and free world,

so we call on you to have the same kind of boldness. Our call is especially urgent – especially

urgent in light of the threats we face from powerful countries and actors whose ambition

is to reshape the international order in its own illiberal image.

Let's work together. Let's work together to preserve the free world so that it continues

to serve the interests of the people to whom we each are accountable.

Let's do so in a way that creates international organizations that are agile, that respect

national sovereignty, that deliver on their stated missions, and that create value for

the liberal order and for the world.

President Trump understands deeply that when America leads, peace and prosperity almost

certainly follow.

He knows that if America and our allies here in Europe don't lead, others will choose

to do so.

America will, as it has always done, continue to work with our allies around the world towards

the peaceful, liberal order each citizen of the world deserves.

Thank you for joining me here today. May the Good Lord bless each and every one of you.

Thank you. (Applause.)

For more infomation >> Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order - Duration: 19:03.

-------------------------------------------

Michael Flynn Mueller to recommend sentence for former Trump adviser US news - Duration: 3:26.

Michael Flynn Mueller to recommend sentence for former Trump adviser US news

Flynn's sentencing was delayed four times after Mueller said he needed more time 'due to the status of the investigation'

Flynn's sentencing was delayed four times after Mueller said he needed more time 'due to the status of the investigation'

Robert Mueller is expected to disclose on Tuesday how Donald Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, has been assisting his investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Mueller, the special counsel leading the Trump-Russia inquiry, is scheduled to file a memo to court in Washington DC that will recommend a sentence for Flynn, who has been cooperating since December last year, when he admitted lying to the FBI.

The sentencing of Flynn, a retired US army lieutenant general, was delayed four times after Mueller repeatedly said he needed more time "due to the status of the investigation" – an indication that he wanted to protect sensitive information.

Flynn admitted lying to investigators about his communications with Russia's ambassador to the US late in December 2016. The discussions related to sanctions then president Barack Obama had imposed on Moscow over its interference in the US election, and a UN security council vote on halting new Israeli settlements.

Trump and White House advisers were anxiously awaiting the filing on Tuesday, following more explosive developments in Mueller's investigation.

Last week Michael Cohen, Trump's former legal fixer, said he had lied to Congress about Trump's plans to build a tower in Moscow, in an attempt to protect the president. Days earlier Mueller's team scrapped a plea deal with Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign chairman, after he allegedly continued lying to investigators even after promising to cooperate.

The president claimed on Twitter on Monday that Mueller was "a much different man than people think" and praised his longtime associate Roger Stone for refusing to testify against him – a move legal experts said could amount to criminal witness tampering.

Sentencing memos filed by Mueller in other prosecutions so far, including former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, have contained new information about wrongdoing and cooperation by the subjects.

Mueller has said that on 29 December 2016, Flynn asked Russia's ambassador not to retaliate against Obama's sanctions, after receiving instructions from a senior member of Trump's transition team, who was with the president-elect at Trump's private club in Florida.

Russian president Vladimir Putin indicated in a statement the following day that Russia would not retaliate, a move Trump praised as "very smart". Mueller said the Russian ambassador then called Flynn on 31 December to explain that Putin's decision was a response to Flynn's request.

Mueller also said that under direction from a "very senior" member of the Trump team, reported to be Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and adviser, Flynn successfully urged Russia to vote against the resolution on Israel at the UN.

Flynn could face up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000, but is likely to receive a lesser sentence. His attorneys are expected to request that he be placed on probation and not have to spend time in prison.

Mueller's memo is due to be filed at the federal court by midnight on Tuesday. Sections of the document could be kept under seal, meaning they would not be viewable to the public.

For more infomation >> Michael Flynn Mueller to recommend sentence for former Trump adviser US news - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

man walks across the united states - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> man walks across the united states - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

Juliana v. United States: The Constitutional Implications of Climate Change - Duration: 50:43.

For more infomation >> Juliana v. United States: The Constitutional Implications of Climate Change - Duration: 50:43.

-------------------------------------------

National Renaissance Party (United States) | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 10:34.

For more infomation >> National Renaissance Party (United States) | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 10:34.

-------------------------------------------

President's state funeral tomorrow - Duration: 2:57.

For more infomation >> President's state funeral tomorrow - Duration: 2:57.

-------------------------------------------

United States Marijuana Party | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 5:33.

For more infomation >> United States Marijuana Party | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 5:33.

-------------------------------------------

History of the United States (1945–1964) | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 57:38.

For more infomation >> History of the United States (1945–1964) | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 57:38.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Navy pays tribute to former President George H.W. Bush - Duration: 2:40.

For more infomation >> U.S. Navy pays tribute to former President George H.W. Bush - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

Labor Party of the United States | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 9:30.

For more infomation >> Labor Party of the United States | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 9:30.

-------------------------------------------

Elections in United States | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 34:32.

For more infomation >> Elections in United States | Wikipedia audio article - Duration: 34:32.

-------------------------------------------

President George H.W. Bush lies in state in U.S. Capitol Rotunda The Washington Post - Duration: 4:42.

President George H.W. Bush lies in state in U.S. Capitol Rotunda The Washington Post

Joggers in running gear, suit clad federal workers, families and CIA chiefs past and present were among those paying tribute George H.W. Bush on Tuesday, slowly filling the Capitol Rotunda and streaming one by one past the late presidents flag draped coffin.

With clasped hands, somber expressions and some tears, they came to bid farewell to a fallen leader — average Americans honoring the patrician man who dedicated decades to public service.

Bush died last week in Texas and will lie in state at the Capitol Rotunda until Wednesday morning. Bushs body was brought to the Capitol on Monday to begin days of tributes in Washington and Texas, which will include a national day of mourning and a state funeral Wednesday.

Mourners began heading inside well before the sun rose on Tuesday morning, climbing two flights of stairs to gather around a coffin cloaked with an American flag and ringed by three floral wreaths and an honor guard. Some had known the 41st president during his time in office, serving under him as he sent troops into combat. Others knew him only as a figure from their textbooks or as the father of the 43rd president.

Sully, the steadfast service dog who accompanied Bush in the final months of his life, also took a spot in the Rotunda.

[President Bushs final farewell to Washington]

Those saying goodbye included Colin L. Powell, who Bush named as his chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and generals who served during the 1991 Persian Gulf War under Bush. Before them came Gina Haspel, the current CIA director, along with John Brennan and others who had served in the same role, which Bush held before ascending to the vice presidency and the Oval Office.

These figures from official Washington were joined by many from unofficial Washington and beyond who made the trek inside. Daniel Bean, a runner who changed his route to include the Capitol early Tuesday so he could attend the viewing, said he missed the way Bush handled himself in public office.

I was quite impressed with his demeanor. You just dont see that anymore, said Bean, 63, of Upper Marlboro, who joined the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in 1990, two years after Bush was elected to office. I miss his way of doing things.

Bean signed a condolence book before he left, one of several available for people to sign. Visitors were also given a card that features a photograph of Bush, a message of appreciation from his family and a glimpse of his resume, which included two terms as vice president, four years in Congress and a stint leading the CIA before he was elected president in 1989.

Nolean Deskins, a federal budget analyst who has worked under every president since Richard Nixon, called Bush the best president to serve under — especially when it came to raises for federal workers.

[Sully, Bushs service dog, lies by his casket]

When a former president dies, the public mourning process offered by having them lie in state gives the public a chance to say farewell. Bush is the 12th president to lie in state at the Capitol, a tradition that dates back to Abraham Lincoln in April 1865, although not every president has been honored that way. After Nixon died in 1994, his family chose not to have him lie in state; former aide David Gergen speculated at the time that Nixon might have opted against it because he often thought Congress had tormented him.

The first person memorialized this way was Henry Clay, a former senator and speaker of the House, in 1852, according to the House of Representatives. In recent years, the honor has also been given to senators Daniel Inouye and John McCain.

The tradition offers a brief period of stillness in an unsettled time, a ritual that crystallizes the moment when the country formally mourns and says goodbye. There have not been many presidents in the nations relatively young history, and Bushs death leaves just four living former presidents as well as the Oval Offices current inhabitant.

Before Bush, the last presidents to lie in state were Ronald Reagan — for whom Bush served as vice president — in 2004 and, a little more than two years later, Gerald Ford, who like Bush was a World War II veteran, congressman and vice president before serving as president. Statues of both men adorn the Rotunda now holding Bushs body.

Bushs time in office saw a period of astonishing change around the world, but voters ousted him after one term in favor of then Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton. Eight years later, George W. Bush would follow Clinton and his fathers footsteps into office. Jeb Bush, another of his sons, served as Florida governor and sought the Republican nomination in 2016 but was defeated by President Trump, who came to pay his respects Monday night.

Trump tweeted that he would be visiting with the Bush family at the Blair House and that first lady Melania Trump would give Laura Bush, her predecessor in the role, a tour of holiday decorations.

The former First Lady will be coming over to the White House this morning to be given a tour of the Christmas decorations by Melania, Trump wrote. The elegance and precision of the last two days have been remarkable!

A steady stream of visitors continued throughout the morning, though there were no lines causing delays or lengthy waits for people outside. A tour guide said she expected the line to balloon at the end of the business day, saying that was what happened when crowds came to honor McCain and Ford.

I was prepared to wait for hours, said Claire McGuire, a consultant from the District. She had attended Bushs inauguration and felt compelled to be here, as a kind of bookend.

She recalled viewing former Ford lying state and said the experience was profound and moving.

I feel really lucky that I can be here, and I also felt like I really had to come, she said.

[George H.W. Bush makes his last journey to Washington]

Some came from farther away to say farewell. Richard Juliana, a funeral director, and his 18 year old son, Christian, hit the road at about 4 a.m. in Westchester, Pa., to come to the viewing. Hours before sunrise, they both fastened American flag ties around their necks to dress for the occasion.

He was the last World War II veteran to serve as president — the last of his kind, really, the elder Juliana said. I never met him. I wish I had.

Julianas father, James Juliana, had served as an assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration, passing along firsthand stories of Bush. It was this family connection that made Rich Juliana feel compelled to be here and to bring his own son to pay their respects in person, he said.

They got to Capitol just after 8 a.m. and were headed back to Pennsylvania right afterward.

I obviously wasnt alive when he was elected, Christian said. That generation and time period feels long gone.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét