Thứ Ba, 29 tháng 8, 2017

Auto news on Youtube Aug 29 2017

Hey There.

Lately a very troubling idea has been floating around.

Today we ask the question, Is the United States heading towards a Civil War?

The answer is no, absolutely not.

These articles are half-baked clickbait.

I of course would never cover a controversial topic just for the views.

My hypocrisy aside, I think it's worth addressing the general sense that the US Republic is

in unprecedented danger.

It's not.

There are many problems.

The internet has been doing some very weird things to our economy and our politics.

Anybody with a smart phone can impact the national conversation.

I'm obviously a big fan of this, but there are downsides.

It's given us a president who is an idiot and a blowhard.

Most troublingly, the rise of the alt-right has turned the country's racist sub-text

into text.

It's shocking to be dealing with proud white Supremacists in 2017, and I don't want to

minimize that.

But we're nowhere near where we were in the run up to the US Civil War.

In fact I can think of a number of historical points since then when we were in a lot worse

shape than we are today.

We've got problems, but we can handle them.

We've handled them before.

1990s

When it comes to the possibility of armed insurrection, I'd argue that things were

actually worse in the early 1990s.

Anybody remember the Michigan Militia?

After a botched arrest at Ruby Ridge in 1992, and the government massacre of a religious

cult in Waco in 1993, the armed militia movement exploded across the country.

Thousands, some say tens of thousands of people formed armed groups, who talked enthusiastically

about fighting the federal government.

I'd say that's a good deal more intimidating than a bunch of losers re-tweeting frog memes

wouldn't you?

On April 19,1995 Timothy McVeigh, a man affiliated with the militia movement, blew up a federal

building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people.

After that the militia movement pretty much evaporated.

Remnants still exist, but it was over as a mass phenomenon.

It's too early to tell, but I am getting the sense that the death of Heather Heyer

in Charlottesville earlier this month might be having a similar effect on the Alt-Right.

Ironic Racism isn't that cute anymore.

1890's-1910s

Some claim we're going to get a civil war over income inequality.

Globalization and the internet mean that the rich are doing very, very well, while the

majority of the country hasn't made much progress in decades.

That's a real problem.

But here's a question.

Have you ever gone to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York?

100 years ago the contents of this museum, and dozens of other museums across the country

sat in the many mansions of our plutocrats.

America's millionaires truly lived like Kings.

At the same time Much of the country lived like this.

We've had extremes of wealth and poverty before.

And they were much, much worse at the turn of the last century.

Sorting that era out occasionally involved open warfare between capitalists and workers.

A consensus seems to be building that something needs to be done about inequality today.

And nobody's died in a strike.

We don't know what the answer is yet, but we're already focused on the problem.

And to go all the way back to 1861, the year the US civil war started, there's something

very basic missing if we were heading for a repeat.

There were dissidents in the North and South back then, but most folks were on board with

their sectional interest.

We love talking about Red States and Blue states today, as if everybody in California

was a Democrat, and everybody in Texas was a Republican.

That's just not true.

31% of California, the home of Nixon and Reagan, voted for Donald Trump in 2016.

And Texas actually increased its Democratic percentage in 2016.

For Hillary Clinton, the 2nd most hated presidential candidate in US history.

I'm beginning to suspect that Trump will lose in 2020 actually, not because the Democrats

will get their acts together, but because Texas will go blue.

But that's a different video.

When people imagine a new civil war, they probably aren't envisioning armies in blue

and gray like the 1860's they're probably thinking of something darker and more messy.

They are thinking of the 1960's, but moreso.

To truly do justice to the 1960's we're going to need a whole nother video.

Come back later this week, or maybe next week for 4 Dead In Ohio, my discussion of the 1960's

in memory and in fact.

Thanks for watching, please subscribe, and if you sign up for my e-mail newsletter you

get a free essay!

For more infomation >> Is The United States Heading Towards Civil War? | Civil War I - Duration: 5:32.

-------------------------------------------

US Secretary of State Tillerson joins chorus of Trump critics on Charlottesville violence - Duration: 9:12.

US Secretary of State Tillerson joins chorus of Trump critics on Charlottesville violence

Washington:  Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is the latest and highest-ranking administration official to distance himself from President Donald Trump, saying in a Sunday interview that the president speaks for himself in his response to racial hatred and violence.

Tillerson was asked on Fox News Sunday whether he thought Trump was expressing American values of tolerance and equality in his handling of racially tinged violence during a white-supremacist march in Charlottesville, Virginia, earlier this month. The president speaks for himself, he said.

When asked whether he was separating himself from Trumps remarks, Tillerson answered, Ive made my own comments as to our values.

That was a reference to remarks Tillerson made on August 18 about inclusiveness and tolerance in a discussion of racial diversity and American values.

His remarks were read as implicit criticism of Trump and his assertion that both sides were to blame for violence that killed a woman who was protesting the white-supremacist rally.

Tillersons remarks followed harsh criticism of Trump from National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn, who said in an interview on Friday that he nearly quit over the presidents handling of the events in Charlottesville.

Trump has condemned hate groups in the wake of Charlottesville but twice added equivocation about blame for violence and once said some fine people were among the white-supremacist marchers.

At a campaign rally before a largely white crowd on Tuesday in Phoenix, Trump decried the removal of Confederate statues - the flash point in Charlottesville - and blamed the news media for trying to take away our history and our heritage.

Tillerson had told a group of State Department interns on August 18 that we do not honour, nor do we promote or accept, hate speech in any form.

Tillerson did not invoke Trump or levy direct criticism then, but his discussion of hate speech just days after the Charlottesville rally made his meaning clear.

Those who embrace it poison our public discourse, and they damage the very country that they claim to love, Tillerson had said.

On Sunday, Tillerson rejected criticism from a United Nations committee last week that the Trump administration had failed in its response to Charlottesville and set a poor example for the rest of the world.

We express Americas values from the State Department - our commitment to freedom, our commitment to equal treatment of people the world over, Tillerson said in the Fox interview, and that message has never changed.

The leaders of Britain and Germany had previously said in response to Charlottesville that violence and bigotry must always be condemned.

ne until our country gets back to understanding and respecting each other and showing it. Mattis has not commented on the video, which was apparently recorded as he addressed troops in Jordan.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has defended Trumps remarks, but most other top aides have not directly addressed the controversy. Trump was privately furious about Cohns rebuke, The Washington Post reported, but the president has not commented publicly on his aides remarks.

Trump highly prizes personal loyalty and had earlier sharply criticised Attorney General Jeff Sessions for actions in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election that Trump saw as disloyal.

It is not clear whether Tillerson has raised his concerns directly with Trump, although the two speak frequently and Tillerson met with Trump last week at the White House. Tillerson has not addressed whether he considered resigning over Trumps remarks.

Tillerson participated in Trumps video Cabinet meeting about flooding from Hurricane Harvey shortly after the television interview.

In that interview, Tillerson also addressed the departure on Friday of former White House adviser Sebastian Gorka, who had criticised Tillerson as one of the globalists thwarting Trumps America First agenda.

Fox host Chris Wallace quoted from Gorkas resignation letter, which said that a crucial element of the presidential campaign has been lost because Trumps speech laying out his policy for Afghanistan did not mention radical Islamic terrorism.

I think hes completely wrong, Tillerson said. I think it shows a lack of understanding of the presidents broader policy when it comes to protecting Americans at home and abroad from all acts of terrorism..

Tillerson, a former Exxon Mobil chief executive with no prior government experience, has expressed mainstream Republican views on many foreign policy issues and has lost some internal policy battles such as whether to remain a party to the landmark Paris climate accord.

I dont see any division, between Trumps nationalist advisers and his more mainstream aides, Tillerson said on Sunday.

He added: I think its a question of tactics and how you achieve those objectives. I think the president has been clear in his speech in Afghanistan that we are not undertaking nation-building, as Gorka and others have charged.

On North Korea, Tillerson said the nations missile tests dont necessarily mean that Kim Jong Uns regime is thumbing its nose at the offer of negotiations with the United States.

Clearly, they are still messaging us, as well, that they are not prepared to completely back away from their positions, Tillerson said. We continue to want the Kim regime to understand there is a different path that he can choose..

The launch of three short-range missiles on Saturday followed statements from Trump and Tillerson last week that took note of what Tillerson called recent restraint on the part of Pyongyang.

Until the launch, which came on Friday night in the United States, North Korea had not launched any missiles since the unanimous approval of new United Nations Security Council sanctions three weeks ago.

That caused Trump to say that North Korea was finally starting to respect us.. I dont know that were wrong, Tillerson said. Its going to take some time to tell..

For more infomation >> US Secretary of State Tillerson joins chorus of Trump critics on Charlottesville violence - Duration: 9:12.

-------------------------------------------

Tillerson to Cut Dozens of Special Envoys in State Department Overhaul - Duration: 1:01.

For more infomation >> Tillerson to Cut Dozens of Special Envoys in State Department Overhaul - Duration: 1:01.

-------------------------------------------

Trump To Have Lunch With Tillerson Following Sec State's Critical Comment - Duration: 1:56.

Trump To Have Lunch With Tillerson Following Sec State's Critical Comment

President Donald Trump will have lunch with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Monday after Tillerson appeared to distance Trump's statements from the nation's values.

The president isn't one to take kindly to criticism, but he has yet to publicly comment on Tillerson's remarks.

The White House schedule for Monday says that Trump and Vice President Pence will have lunch with the secretary of state, and later Trump will host a joint press conference with Finnish President Sauli Niinisto.

Tillerson appeared on "Fox News Sunday" and said that the State Department represents "America's values, our commitment to freedom, our commitment to equal treatment of people the world over, and that message has never changed.

He continued on to say that he doesn't believe "anyone doubts the American people's values," and host Chris Wallace asked, "And the president's values?". Tillerson replied, "The president speaks for himself, Chris.

Wallace asked Tillerson if he was separating himself "from that" and the secretary of state didn't deny that was the case, instead referring to a recent speech he made condemning bigotry.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét