Breaking News Today⚠️World War 3 North Korea THREAT, Former US President warns WAR with Kim Jong un
-------------------------------------------
US Army Troops to Test Augmented Reality Next Year - Duration: 1:00.
For more infomation >> US Army Troops to Test Augmented Reality Next Year - Duration: 1:00. -------------------------------------------
The Aftermath of the US-China Trade War - Duration: 2:00.
The trade war between the U.S. and China will create a synthesis between the two economic
systems.
Capitalism will fall with the collapse of the economy under the mounting pressures of
China.
The Chinese economy is called "state capitalism" by American commentators, a preliminary stage
of a socialized economy, operated by the state superpower.
Free Trade as we know it will be oppressed by the trade war through forced socialism.
Meaning that the US economy will integrate by policy into the government, furthering
protectionist trade.
The US will "buckle down" on its' investments into capital through enacting policies that
suppress the market into a harshly regulated system in an isolated US economy.
The policies will cause the economic infrastructure to outsource to China, leaving desolation
behind.
The globalized economy will begin here and it's maturation will give rise to an international
order, a NWO.
A quote from the Washington Examiner: "Xi's continued power also means his ongoing
effort to replace the U.S.-led international order built on democracy and free trade with
a Chinese order built on Chinese hegemony and patronage."
The synthesis of Free Market Capitalism and State Socialism will consolidate economic
powers into the hands of the winning state superpower of this trade war, which will most
likely be China, and the remaining US oligarchy that were "sold out".
The NWO global economy will be similar to walking into a Costco, with all products having
the same brand name while being sold in bulk.
We are embarking a transitional stage that involves the entire industrialized world.
We are globalizing, and the next few years will be challenging.
-------------------------------------------
S. Korean president calls Korea, U.S. FTA revision talks "job well done" - Duration: 2:12.
Calling it a job well done, President Moon Jae-in showed appreciation for the trade officials'
accomplishments with regards to the recently concluded negotiations between Seoul and Washington.
The deal helped remove a possible source of conflict at a time when close cooperation
between the allies is more important than ever before.
Arirang's chief Cheongwadae correspondent Moon Connyoung has our top story.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in is relieved that any potential conflict between Seoul
and Washington have been settled... by concluding negotiations on the six-year-old Korea, U.S.
free trade agreement.
Speaking at a weekly meeting of his top aides on Monday, the South Korean leader gave credit
to his trade officials who spent weeks hotel-hopping in Washington as they raced to overcome major
trade hurdles with their U.S. ally ahead of high-stakes nuclear discussions with North
Korea.
"As trade protectionism turns into a dominant trend around the world, removing external
uncertainties by swiftly wrapping up talks for the Korea, U.S. FTA amendment is a huge
accomplishment."
The trade officials' efforts culminated in a revised pact the two countries announced
last week that gives U.S. automakers and pharmaceuticals more access to the South Korean market...
while lifting the threat of a 25 percent U.S. tariff on South Korean steel in exchange for
quotas that will cut imports of Korean steel by about 30 percent.
The president, however, still asked his government to carefully review possible impacts of the
revised free trade deal and draw up necessary measures to make sure local industries aren't
negatively affected.
"It's also a job well done in that it has removed potential conflicts between the two
countries when close cooperation between South Korea and the U.S. is absolutely criticial
for the establishment of peace on the Korean Peninsula and resolving North Korea's nuclear
issue."
"By securing a new approach to bilateral trade, the presidential Blue House believes...
South Korea and the U.S. can focus on the road ahead... and keep all of their attention
on the high politics of peace and security... with the South Korean president set to meet
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the end of this month and the first-ever North Korea,
U.S. summit expected to take place by May.
Moon Connyoung, Arirang News, the Blue House."
-------------------------------------------
UK and US culture quiz - Duration: 6:52.
Megan: Hi, everybody, and welcome back to another video for the LearnEnglish Teens website
and their YouTube channel.
Today I'm joined by my friend, Chris.
Do you want to introduce yourself?
Chris: I'm Chris.
I'm from New York – America, for people who don't know where New York is!
And, yeah, I'm currently living in Hanover as a language assistant.
Megan: In this video I'm going to be testing Chris on his cultural knowledge of the UK,
and he's going to be testing me on my knowledge of America.
OK, question number one.
I'm going to give you three options: A, B and C. What street, or what is the name
of the street, that the British Prime Minister lives on?
A: 10 Downing Street, B: 11 Chichester Road
or C: 10 Dorchester Street?
Do you recognise any of those names?
Chris: A sounds the most familiar but I don't … is that right?
Megan: It's right!
Chris: Oh my God!
Megan: 10 Downing Street is where the Prime Minister lives.
Chris: OK, so my first question is … Megan: Oh, I'm scared!
Chris: How many states are there in the US?
Megan: 50.
Chris: Ha!
Megan: What is the name of William and Kate's oldest child?
Chris: I wouldn't know … Megan: This is Prince William, by the way.
Chris: OK.
No, I don't know.
Not off the top of my head.
Megan: If I say it begins with 'G' … Chris: George?
Megan: Yeah!
George, Prince George.
Chris: OK.
I think this one's a little bit harder, but we'll see.
Megan: OK.
Chris: What do the stripes on the American flag represent?
Megan: Oh, I don't … Chris: There's 13 of them.
Megan: Was it, is it something to do with the founders of the Constitution?
Chris: No.
It has to do with the colonies.
Megan: Thirteen colonies of America?
Chris: Yep, that's it.
Megan: I didn't know that.
Which sport is Wimbledon famous for?
Chris: Oh, tennis!
OK, we kind of talked about this before but this is kind of hard, so we'll see.
Megan: OK.
Chris: So, what do we call the four years of college in the US?
Megan: What do you call the four years of college?
Oh, I see – I have to name each of the separate years?
Chris: Yeah.
Megan: Oh, I thought … OK, sorry.
I thought there was, like, an overall title.
OK, so there's freshman, sophomore, junior, senior.
Chris: Yeah!
That's it.
Megan: Yeah!
I'm glad I got that.
OK, good.
Well, I got half a point, really.
Chris: That was a hard one.
That was, like, four questions in one.
Megan: Yeah, it was actually!
OK, erm – when did London host the Olympic Games?
What year?
Chris: Was it in the 2000s?
Megan: Yep.
Relatively recently, Chris: Was it, erm, 2008?
2012?
Megan: 2012, yeah!
Chris: Cool.
Megan: Nearly!
Chris: OK.
Well, this one's fun, I think.
What do we call biscuits?
Megan: Cookies?
Chris: Yep!
Megan: I knew that!
I definitely eat loads …
Chris: Who was the first president of the United States?
Megan: I knew you were going to ask me this and I was, like, 'Oh, I'll just double-check',
and I haven't double-checked.
I don't want to get it wrong!
It's George Washington?
Chris: Yep!
Megan: OK, good!
Because I'm always unsure whether it's George Washington or Abraham Lincoln.
Chris: Abraham Lincoln was, like, 13th or something, I think.
Megan: Yeah, yeah.
OK.
OK.
Whew, I'm glad I got that!
That could have been really embarrassing.
OK, question number five: what is the nickname for an East End London accent?
I have A, B or C, but if you know it, then …
Chris: I don't know it.
Megan: OK, A: Brummie, B: Geordie or C: Cockney.
It's quite a well-known accent.
Chris: Is it Cockney?
Megan: Yeah.
What is the nickname for London's underground?
So, what British people call it?
Chris: Oh, the Tube?
Megan: Yeah!
Who created The X Factor?
The name of the guy who … I mean, he's one of the most …
Chris: He's British?
Megan: Yeah.
Chris: Is it Simon Cowell?
Megan: Simon Cowell, yeah!
You're definitely doing better than me so far, oh my gosh!
Chris: I feel like my questions are harder, though.
I don't know.
Megan: Yours are gradually getting harder.
Chris: Are they?
Well, why don't we just have two more, and they're both just American words that I'm
pretty sure British people don't use, so …
Megan: Oh, I like questions like this.
OK.
Chris: So, what's a doohickey?
Megan: I mean, when I hear the word 'hickey' I definitely think of something …
Chris: It's not a hickey!
Megan: OK, got it!
A 'duehickey'?
Chris: A doohickey.
Megan: A 'do'?
D-O?
Chris: D-O-O.
Megan: I have never heard of that, ever.
There's probably loads of people watching, like, 'Oh my God, it's so obvious.'
Chris: I honestly don't say it that often.
I think it's a kind of older word, but … Megan: Can you give me … in what context
would you say it?
Can you say it in a sentence?
Chris: Like, for example, I'd be, like, 'Oh, can you give me the doohickey?'
Megan: Is it like a thingy?
Chris: Yeah.
Megan: Ah!
So, would you say it about, like, a TV remote?
Chris: Yeah, if I can't think of the word, I'll just be, like, 'Oh, give me the doohickey.'
Megan: Whereas I'd just say, 'Give me the thingy.'
Oh, OK.
I quite like that, 'doohickey'!
That's cool.
Oh, it's my go.
Chris: Last question.
Megan: This is my last question, yeah.
What is the nickname for the flag of the UK?
Chris: I feel like I should know this, but I …
Megan: Mmm, I don't know.
It's quite … Chris: I don't know.
Do I get a … Megan: It's three words.
The first one, 'the'.
Chris: I feel like when you tell me, I'm going to know it, but I don't, I can't
think of it right now.
Megan: Are you ready to give up?
Chris: Yeah.
Megan: The Union Jack.
Chris: Oh, yeah!
I've definitely heard that! OK.
OK, my last question is … Megan: I really want to get this right.
Chris: What's a faucet?
Megan: A faucet?
Chris: A faucet.
Megan: Again, I think I need a sentence.
I've never heard of it, so … Chris: Umm …
Megan: How are you spelling it?
Chris: F-A-U-C-E-T.
Megan: Oh, OK.
Does that have anything to do with … Chris: So, like, turn on the faucet.
Megan: Turn on? Chris: It's in the kitchen.
Megan: I've never … Chris: You get water from it.
Megan: Tap?
Chris: Yeah!
Megan: You call a tap a faucet?
That sounds like a different language!
That doesn't sound like English.
Chris: I mean, it probably came from French, I'd say.
Megan: Yeah, I mean, yeah, it sounds French.
Cool!
So, is that it?
Are we done?
Chris: That's it, yeah.
Megan: Well, Chris, definitely … you've definitely won.
Thank you ever so much for watching.
I really hope you enjoyed this video and, if you did, like this and subscribe to the
British Council's LearnEnglish Teens.
Thank you very much.
Chris: See ya!
Megan: Bye!
-------------------------------------------
TRADE WARS: China slaps US with massive £3billion import tariffs in retaliation for steel - Duration: 2:57.
TRADE WARS: China slaps US with massive £3billion import tariffs in retaliation for steel
CHINA has slapped the USA with tariffs of up to worth $3 billion (£2.1 billion) on
128 US imports in retaliation against Donald Trump's steel import charges.
President Xi Jinping has retaliated against Donald Trump by hitting the USA with tariffs
on popular imports like pork and wine.
The trade war row comes after the US President hit Beijing with steel and aluminium duties
totalling $60 billion last month.
The move will "safeguard China's interests and balance", according to Beijing.
President XI plans also to place 15 percent tariffs on nuts, fresh and dried fruit, as
well as rolled steel bars.
Some experts warned China could tax US tech companies like Apple next - which would force
big American firms to raise their prices to compensate.
But Donald Trump has reacted bullishly to the news that China has ramped up its efforts
in a trade war with America.
The imposition of tariffs is due to China's theft of foreign intellectual property - and
a historical trade imbalance between the two nations.
Mr Trump insisted "trade wars are good," and that it will be "easy" for the USA
to beat China.
China has a large surplus with the US and for that reason has much more downside if
a trade war escalates.
The President tweeted last month: "When a country (USA) is losing many billions of
dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good,
and easy to win.
"Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute,
don't trade anymore-we win big.
It's easy!"
American authorities have already announced plans to further place tariffs on Chinese
imports.
A tit-for-tat trade war between the two economic superpowers has been developing for some time
- and could jeopardise growth in global markets.
Donald Trump has also warned the European Union they too could face tariffs if they
do not open up their market.
The EU is famously protectionist, ratcheting up tariffs against often less prosperous non-EU
countries.
Prime Minister Theresa May has tried to use her influence to oppose the erection of trade
barriers in Europe and America, as has Trade Secretary Liam Fox.
-------------------------------------------
China's tariffs on US imports threaten farmers - Duration: 1:06.
China's decision to put retaliatory tariffs on dozens of American imports will impact
farmers across the U.S.
Among the 128 new tariffs China announced Sunday are a 25 percent hike on U.S. pork
and a 15 percent increase on sparkling wine and a variety of fruits and nuts.
China said it's imposing the import duties in response to a U.S. tariff hike on billions
of dollars worth of Chinese imports, which President Donald Trump announced last month.
Trump has said the tariffs on China's goods will protect the U.S. economy.
And experts say the immediate impact of China's retaliatory move shouldn't be too large.
But Americans in the agricultural business are worried that escalating trade tensions
between the two countries could decrease demand for their products.
And they fear even more substantial tariffs could be on the horizon.
As Time notes, China has hinted at a possible tariff on soybeans — which is one of the
leading U.S. agricultural exports.
According to the Department of Agriculture, the U.S. sent more than $21 billion worth
of agricultural exports to China in 2016.
-------------------------------------------
China hits U.S. with $38B in tariffs (ASL - 4.2.18) - Duration: 1:10.
For more infomation >> China hits U.S. with $38B in tariffs (ASL - 4.2.18) - Duration: 1:10. -------------------------------------------
S. Korean president calls Korea, U.S. FTA revision talks "job well done" - Duration: 2:07.
President Moon Jae-in has called the recently concluded negotiations between Seoul and Washington
"a job well done" as it managed to remove a possible source of conflict at a time when
close cooperation between the allies is more important than ever.
Our chief Blue House correspondent Moon Connyoung reports.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in is relieved that any potential conflict between Seoul
and Washington have been settled... by concluding negotiations on the six-year-old Korea, U.S.
free trade agreement.
Speaking at a weekly meeting of his top aides on Monday, the South Korean leader gave credit
to his trade officials who spent weeks hotel-hopping in Washington as they raced to overcome major
trade hurdles with their U.S. ally ahead of high-stakes nuclear discussions with North
Korea.
"As trade protectionism turns into a dominant trend around the world, removing external
uncertainties by swiftly wrapping up talks for the Korea, U.S. FTA amendment is a huge
accomplishment."
The trade officials' efforts culminated in a revised pact the two countries announced
last week that gives U.S. automakers and pharmaceuticals more access to the South Korean market...
while lifting the threat of a 25 percent U.S. tariff on South Korean steel in exchange for
quotas that will cut imports of Korean steel by about 30 percent.
The president, however, still asked his government to carefully review possible impacts of the
revised free trade deal and draw up necessary measures to make sure local industries aren't
negatively affected.
"It's also a job well done in that it has removed potential conflicts between the two
countries when close cooperation between South Korea and the U.S. is absolutely criticial
for the establishment of peace on the Korean Peninsula and resolving North Korea's nuclear
issue."
"By securing a new approach to bilateral trade, the presidential Blue House believes...
South Korea and the U.S. can focus on the road ahead... and keep all of their attention
on the high politics of peace and security... with the South Korean president set to meet
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the end of this month and the first-ever North Korea,
U.S. summit expected to take place by May.
Moon Connyoung, Arirang News, the Blue House."
-------------------------------------------
China Slaps Tariffs on 128 US Products - Duration: 0:56.
For more infomation >> China Slaps Tariffs on 128 US Products - Duration: 0:56. -------------------------------------------
S. Korean president calls Korea, U.S. FTA revision talks "job well done" - Duration: 2:15.
Calling it a job well done, President Moon Jae-in showed appreciation for the trade officials'
accomplishments with regards to the recently concluded negotiations between Seoul and Washington.
The deal helped remove a possible source of conflict at a time when close cooperation
between the allies is more important than ever before.
Arirang's chief Cheongwadae correspondent Moon Connyoung has our top story.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in is relieved that any potential conflict between Seoul
and Washington have been settled... by concluding negotiations on the six-year-old Korea, U.S.
free trade agreement.
Speaking at a weekly meeting of his top aides on Monday, the South Korean leader gave credit
to his trade officials who spent weeks hotel-hopping in Washington as they raced to overcome major
trade hurdles with their U.S. ally ahead of high-stakes nuclear discussions with North
Korea.
"As trade protectionism turns into a dominant trend around the world, removing external
uncertainties by swiftly wrapping up talks for the Korea, U.S. FTA amendment is a huge
accomplishment."
The trade officials' efforts culminated in a revised pact the two countries announced
last week that gives U.S. automakers and pharmaceuticals more access to the South Korean market...
while lifting the threat of a 25 percent U.S. tariff on South Korean steel in exchange for
quotas that will cut imports of Korean steel by about 30 percent.
The president, however, still asked his government to carefully review possible impacts of the
revised free trade deal and draw up necessary measures to make sure local industries aren't
negatively affected.
"It's also a job well done in that it has removed potential conflicts between the two
countries when close cooperation between South Korea and the U.S. is absolutely criticial
for the establishment of peace on the Korean Peninsula and resolving North Korea's nuclear
issue."
"By securing a new approach to bilateral trade, the presidential Blue House believes...
South Korea and the U.S. can focus on the road ahead... and keep all of their attention
on the high politics of peace and security... with the South Korean president set to meet
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the end of this month and the first-ever North Korea,
U.S. summit expected to take place by May.
Moon Connyoung, Arirang News, the Blue House."
-------------------------------------------
Japan-US Summit to Be Held in Florida - Duration: 1:02.
For more infomation >> Japan-US Summit to Be Held in Florida - Duration: 1:02. -------------------------------------------
Breaking News Today⚠️World War 3 TRADE WARS, China slaps US with massive £3billion import... - Duration: 2:41.
Breaking News Today⚠️World War 3 TRADE WARS, China slaps US with massive £3billion import...
-------------------------------------------
After crash killed mother and son, police target speeders on US 183 - Duration: 1:48.
For more infomation >> After crash killed mother and son, police target speeders on US 183 - Duration: 1:48. -------------------------------------------
Trade tensions escalate between U.S. and China as Washington is set to unveil China tariff list ... - Duration: 1:46.
A full-blown trade war between the United States and China is looking more and more
likely as the U.S. gears up to unveil its final list of the Chinese goods that will
be subject to higher tariffs.
And Beijing is retaliating by slapping duties on almost 130 U.S. goods, mostly food products.
Kim Hyo-sun reports.
The U.S. is set to announce a final list of Chinese goods that will be subject to additional
tariffs by Friday,... a move expected to intensify trade tensions between the world's two economic
superpowers.
This comes as President Trump signed the China tariff proclamation last month,... as part
of punishment against Beijing over its intellectual property rights violations.
The list, covering 60 billion dollars worth of annual imports, is expected to target over
one hundred products, including home appliances.
China, for its part, has threatened to retaliate with its own trade sanctions.
Beijing's finance ministry said in a statement Sunday that it's increasing the tariff rates
on 128 kinds of U.S. products, including pork and fruits,... and the new rates came into
effect on Monday.
It's imposing 25 percent tariffs on eight kinds of U.S. imports including pork,... and
a 15 percent tariff on 120 other goods including fruits.
The tariffs mirror Washington's 25 percent charge on imported steel and 15 percent hike
on aluminum announced in March.
Such tariffs are seen to target America's so-called "farm belt voters" who helped to
elect Trump,... as U.S. farmers who export wine, fruit and pork will be hurt the most
by Beijing's move.
Kim Hyo-sun, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
The US President's Bulletproof Railcar - Duration: 4:59.
These days, American presidents travel around the country on Air Force One,
but in the 1940's, there was no Air Force One.
Actually, there wasn't even a U.S. Air Force,
they were still part of the Army.
Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first sitting U.S. President
to fly in an airplane, back in 1943.
But for most of his presidency, he used a very different form of travel.
This is the Ferdinand Magellan, officially known as U.S. Car Number 1.
120 tonnes of armor-plated, bulletproof rail car.
- The rail car is the heaviest U.S. rail car ever built.
They had to build special trucks just to support the extra weight.
The reason it only weighs 285,000 pounds is that was the weight limit
for U.S. railroad bridges and trestles at that time.
So, the entire car is not armor-proofed, only where the President is.
The car has ⅝-inch thick bulletproof steel through most of the car,
up to this point here.
You can see where the rivets change from double rivets to single rivets.
Regular steel here versus the bulletproof steel here.
So, there's bulletproofing, there's 12-ply laminated glass,
there are two escape hatches in the car to get the President out.
It was never painted red, white, and blue like Air Force One.
It was always painted Pullman green.
When they had to park it somewhere,
they would hide it with other Pullman rail cars,
so it was basically hiding in plain sight.
- After Roosevelt's death, President Truman used the Magellan for a while,
asking the engineers to get the train up to 80mph, if they could.
Before television was a way to reach the masses,
Truman toured America in this train,
campaigning for re-election, travelling tens of thousands of miles
between tiny stations known as whistle-stops, and making up to eight speeches a day.
And it worked. The famous moment where he held up the newspaper
that wrongly announced his defeat,
that was just there, on the back of this train.
- Now in 1928, air-conditioning was accomplished by ice.
There are ice bunkers in the car, blocks of ice were put in there,
and ceiling fans across the whole car
would then blow the cold air as it dropped down.
So, now we're heading into the armoured part of the car
where the President stayed.
Here, we have the dining room.
All the rooms in the car had a phone in them.
When the car was underway, the phones were
hooked up to a radio car called the General Myer.
And when they were in stations, they were hot-wired
into the phones in the station.
This is the desk the President would use, he could sign papers.
This is what the windows look like.
This is 12-ply, laminated glass, about three inches thick,
so all the windows from this point to the rear of the car
are sealed, you cannot take them out,
which is why they have air-conditioning.
Stateroom C here, this is the President's quarters.
The President has a fixed bed, giving him a little bit of extra leg room.
That is what a commode chair looks like.
The back folds down as a sink
and the seat folds up to be a toilet underneath.
The wheelchair was built specifically for Roosevelt's use in this car,
so he could get up and down the narrow hallway.
Here we have the Presidential bathroom,
and the first of the two escape hatches are here.
What would have been a window has been converted to a steel plate
that they could push out and they could get
the President out that way if they needed to.
What looks like a soap dish hanging by the door here,
is actually a cigar holder.
Roosevelt would sit in there and smoke cigars.
Here we have the observation lounge of the car.
This is where Presidents would sit in the back of the car
and watch the rails pass behind them,
entertain their guests that were on the car with them.
We also have the second escape hatch.
This was fashioned from a submarine.
It was designed if the car was ever knocked over on its side,
they could open this door and go out it.
This door leads to the rear platform.
The door alone weighs 1500 pounds.
That's about half the weight of the car
that most people come to visit our museum in.
It was fashioned after a bank vault.
Out here is the rear platform.
This is where Presidents would give their speeches.
When Truman ascended to the presidency,
after Roosevelt died,
he pretty much lived in this car for a few months
as he did a run across the campaign trail,
and he made more than 350 whistle-stop speeches
from this back platform.
That's what allowed him to connect with the American people.
- Of course, air travel became easier and cheaper and safer
and eventually the Ferdinand Magellan fell out of use.
Nowadays it's a museum piece,
but in an era where the "Trump Train" is just a metaphor,
it's interesting to note that there were other Presidents
whose train was... a little more real.
- America as a country, except for certain parts of the country,
doesn't embrace rails the way that we used to.
This piece is historic, it is unique,
it is hearkening back to a simpler place and time,
and a simpler pace of life.
And that's what I wish we could kinda... get a little piece of that back.
Still keep our cell phones, I'm not giving that up(!)
- Thank you to everyone at the Gold Coast Railway Museum.
Pull down the description for more about them
and about the Ferdinand Magellan.
-------------------------------------------
US Blocks UN Investigation into Israeli Military Killings in Gaza (pt. 2/2) - Duration: 11:27.
SHARMINI PERIES: Welcome back to The Real News Network.
I'm Sharmini Peries in conversation with Col. Larry Wilkerson, who is former chief of staff
to the Secretary of State Colin Powell, now a distinguished professor at the College of
William and Mary.
Thank you so much for joining us today, Larry.
LARRY WILKERSON: Thanks for having me back, Sharmini.
SHARMINI PERIES: All right, Larry, let's take a look at the Iran Nuclear Agreement, also
known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the GCPOA.
This is another example of Trump's closeness to Israel, supporting Israel's effort to terminate
the agreement against the resistance and pushback from Europe's cosigners, the UK, France, and
Germany.
What is the largest strategic objective on the part of the U.S., the Trump administration,
and Netanyahu in terms of undermining the agreement, and what are their greatest hopes
in the region that they're trying to achieve?
LARRY WILKERSON: Let's look at it from the positive side, Sharmini.
What we should do is adhere to the agreement, the nuclear agreement.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
We should adhere to it, just as the Germans and the French and the British and all the
others, Russia, China, are doing.
And just as Iran is doing.
Iran is in full compliance.
There is probably a 1 percent chance that any of this could be untrue.
I'm willing to bet on the 99 percent that says it is true.
If that continues we can certainly arrive at a point where the great negotiating skills
of the great TV star Donald Trump could be employed to go further and take care of some
of the concerns, and in some respects they are genuine concerns, that people have over
this agreement, such as the 15 year point, the 20 four point, 25 year point, and so forth.
Those concerns could be talked about and dealt with, and in the meantime, too, you could
talk about other issues, like ballistic missiles, like support for terrorism.
Though you've got to open parentheses there and say the largest supporter for terrorism
in the world is Saudi Arabia, close those parentheses.
Need to do something about that, too, United States.
And you could probably get to a point where the situation in the Persian Gulf was calmed
down, manageable, settle Syria and some of the other problems at the same time.
We might return to a modicum of stability and possibly prospects for this region's peace.
But here's what I think is happening.
I think Mr. Netanyahu, and interest interestingly enough, much of his security establishment
disagrees, some of them vehemently, with Netanyahu's policy.
I think he's stuck on his own petard.
He has to, one, have an enemy.
He has to have an other, and Iran fills that role for him in order to stay in political
power.
And number two, he has to have someone whom the United States can bait in order to make
it look like the relationship between Washington and Tel Aviv is as solid as ever.
And in order to make it look like the first policy that I've just enumerated is working.
That is to say he needs an other and he needs a superpower around him to face that other.
Doesn't matter that the other is not a real threat.
It just matters that it is in the perception of Israelis and more or less a majority of
Americans.
So what they're trying to do by that policy is not only eventually get to the point where
they unseat the regime in Iran, but also keep perturbated and in turmoil and chaos the majority
of the Arab world.
And particularly that Arab world lives from roughly Beirut down through Damascus over
to Aden.
They want that world incapable of coalescing even as a single state, but certainly as a
group of states, and threatening Israel.
Meanwhile, while that chaos is going on, Israel will make hay.
They will do all that they need to do to consolidate their brutal occupation of the West Bank,
their now occupation of more territory in the Golan, and probably even extend their
perimeters elsewhere to include, of course, as we've already seen, Jerusalem as their
capital.
So that's the Netanyahu strategy.
Now, you asked me if Donald Trump is aware of all this, and if I said yes I'd have to
give him a lot more credit than I'm willing to do.
What Donald Trump is aware of is he knows how to play the base he has in this country
like Anne Sophie Mutter plays Mozart.
And that's what he's doing.
He has no comprehension, in my fullest expectation of his intelligence, he has no expectation,
realization, even intuition of what's going on in Israel.
He's just following the street map required for his domestic base to stay resilient and
more or less in support of him.
So we're marching towards this denouement, whatever it might be, in the Middle East with
him pulling troops out of Syria, putting new American bases in Israel, telling us Netanyahu
can do whatever the hell he wants to do and so forth all simultaneously.
It looks like a really broken dysfunctional foreign policy because it is.
SHARMINI PERIES: Larry, according to the New York Times report this weekend, the head of
the Israeli military, Gen. Gadi Eizenkot, had reported that Iran is actually full compliance
of the nuclear agreement.
So there appears to be a rift between the Israeli military and Netanyahu.
What do you make of this?
LARRY WILKERSON: Sharmini, I've always found, well, let me back up.
I've not always found, but most of the time I have found that Israeli generals, and officers
in particular in the IDF, and for that matter Shin Bet, Mossad, are pretty sharp.
And when we were working on the nuclear agreement, we, a much larger group trying to help President
Obama largely with the U.S. Congress in getting the nuclear agreement through the wickets
it had to go through, we talked to former national security advisers, to generals, to
admirals, to Air Force generals.
We talked to the security establishment in Israel extensively.
By and large we found that they were, some of them reluctantly, some of them less than
reluctantly, in favor of the deal.
And once it was looking as if it were going to go through they, many of them, dropped
their reluctance and said, OK, this is not a bad deal.
Let's face it, we've gone from maybe 30 to 45 days warning of a breakout to over a year's
warning.
We can live with that.
And oh, by the way, we trust the IAEA and all of this very rigorous inspection regime
to do what it says it can do.
And so we're maybe a little worried at 15 years, we're maybe a little worried when 19000
or more centrifuges maybe start spinning again and so forth, but we can deal with that.
We can deal with that.
In the meantime we're kind of happy with this deal.
It's probably the best thing.
We knew also that some of these people, especially the ones on active duty, were telling this
upward to Avigdor Lieberman, although it was a different defense minister at that time.
But now Avigdor Lieberman, and to Bibi Netanyahu.
So this is a real disconnect, politically and militarily.
I think there may be a real problem for this much-embattled prime minister.
He's, after all, being hounded by the courts, and Israeli courts are usually pretty good
hound dogs, and the military.
So we should watch this very carefully.
At any moment that kind of fracturing could cause them some problems.
I don't expect it, but it could.
And you put your finger on another element in this very, very difficult region, very,
very difficult situation in the U.S.-Israeli relationship, that worries me.
The most competent element in Israel in terms of its security is the IDF, and we're doing
some things to the IDF that we probably shouldn't be doing.
Not least of which, Sharmini, is the clamp down.
For example, I didn't know about this until Gideon Levy and some others told me about
it a recent conference.
You're familiar with the Breaking the Silence.
That was about 650-700 Israeli Defense Force officers, NCOs, and others who had come out
to just that, break the silence, and tell about some of the things the IDF was having
to do in the West Bank and Gaza and so forth that truly revolted some of them, made them
feel, disturbed their consciences, made made them feel lower than life.
I mean, really badly.
Well they clamped down on them now.
Netanyahu's government now is so draconian and so authoritarian that none of those people
dare speak up anymore.
Not only their careers and maybe their livelihoods endangered, maybe even their lives are in
danger.
So that's how difficult it has become to be a dissenter, to be a true patriot, to be someone
who wants to speak the truth to power in Israel.
This is a very dangerous situation for Israel as well as for the United States in its connection
with that situation.
So I don't, I'm not very optimistic about the situation.
SHARMINI PERIES: Thank you so much for joining us, Larry.
There's so much more to explore here.
But I think the point you made about the ways in which the U.S. could, if they would manage
this situation in a way that is far more peace-oriented, resolution-oriented.
and we should discuss that as a segment of its own.
I think it would really help certain people in the international community to have somebody
like you advising them about the ways in which they can go about demanding some justice to
what's going on between Israel, Palestine, and the U.S. participation in it.
Thank you so much.
LARRY WILKERSON: It's a very tough situation, a very complex situation.
Yet if one examines it closely, it is subject to being bettered, being ameliorated, being
fixed, if you will.
But the key ingredient is the United States, and I just don't see any inclination to be
that ingredient.
SHARMINI PERIES: All right, Larry.
Thank you so much for joining us today.
LARRY WILKERSON: Thanks for having me, Sharmini.
SHARMINI PERIES: And thank you for joining us here on the Real News Network.
-------------------------------------------
US Blocks UN Investigation into Israeli Military Killings in Gaza (pt. 1/2) - Duration: 14:41.
SHARMINI PERIES: It's the Real News Network.
I'm Sharmini Peries coming to you from Baltimore.
At an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council on Friday the Trump administration
blocked a vote calling for an international investigation into Israeli defense forces
killing 17 and wounding 1500 Palestinians last Friday.
The government of Kuwait had proposed the resolution.
The killings took place in the context of a massive peaceful march of Palestinians near
the Gaza Strip's eastern border.
They called for a return of expropriated land and commemorated the killing of six Palestinians
at a demonstration in 1976.
Here's what Taye-Brook Zerihoun of the United Nations, the Assistant to the Secretary General
for Political Affairs, had to say.
TAYE-BROOK ZERIHOUN: There is fear that the situation might deteriorate in the coming
days.
We will continue to underline that it is imperative that civilians, in particular children, not
be targeted, and that all actors refrain from putting children at risk at any time.
Israel must uphold its responsibilities under international human rights and humanitarian
law.
Lethal force should only be used as a last resort, with any resulting fatalities properly
investigated by the authorities.
SHARMINI PERIES: The Pope at his Easter service on Sunday in Rome had this to say about the
violence.
POPE FRANCIS: We beseech fruits of reconciliation for the Holy Land, also experiencing in these
days the wounds of ongoing conflict that do not spare the defenceless.
For Yemen, and the entire Middle East, so that dialogue and mutual respect may prevail
over division and violence.
SHARMINI PERIES: After taking life of so many Palestinians, Israeli military tweeted: "We
know where every bullet landed," implying that the killings were intentional and targeted.
The tweet had been deleted shortly after it appeared.
Joining me now to discuss all of this is Larry Wilkerson.
Larry is former chief of staff to the Secretary of State Colin Powell, now a distinguished
professor at the College of William and Mary.
Thank you so much for joining us today, Larry.
LARRY WILKERSON: Thanks for having me back, Sharmini.
SHARMINI PERIES: Larry, Walter Miller, the U.S. representative to the U.N., speaking
at the Security Council on Friday claimed that bad actors were using the protests as
a cover to incite more violence and to endanger innocent lives.
There's no evidence, though, if you look at the footage, and we saw a weekend of full
of protest footage that people have posted on social media.
We have no indication that anyone incited any violence.
Why is the Trump administration so determined to defend Israel and its military on this
matter?
LARRY WILKERSON: Sharmini, you might as well ask, why has every American administration
in the last 20-plus years been so willing to do the same?
Particularly when increasing majorities, if not an overwhelming majority of the international
community, sees fit to at least call for investigations if not for condemnation.
And yet the United States, perhaps joined by the prestigious country of the Pacific,
or maybe some other island municipality or country, votes to condemn or to veto, not
to condemn but to veto to keep it from happening is an international action.
The answer to that question, I think, is equally increasingly simple and easy, and that is
that, as Gideon Levy said recently, of Haaretz, the policy of the United States is made in
Tel Aviv, and the policy of Tel Aviv dominates the policy of Washington, even to the point
where he said the only place Trump is unanimously acclaimed is Tel Aviv, and the only place
where Bibi Netanyahu is unanimously acclaimed is Washington.
We are in the back pocket of Israel like we have never been associated with any other
country in the world.
It is astounding how much we are so.
And Donald Trump has just brought that to you apogee, if you will, where anything Bibi
wants, Bibi gets.
And let me just comment on Israeli tactics.
These have been increasingly the same, too.
Israel confronts a protest.
And Israel says, as it did so dramatically, for example, in Operation Cast Lead, anyone
who dares mount a protest, anyone who dares seem as if they might be seeking instability,
we will kill you and kill you and kill you and kill you until you understand that anyone
who raises a little finger against the state of Israel is apt to die.
That's basically Israeli strategy.
SHARMINI PERIES: Now, Larry, you stated something very important, that in the past although
U.S.'s administrations have supported Israel unconditionally Trump has taken this to a
new level.
And it doesn't matter what the international community says or what the United Nations
might or might not consider.
It is amputated every time this discussion even arrives in a place like the Security
Council.
Now can you, just from your experience of having dealt with these situations in the
past, tell us what might work?
What other ways in which you can actually draw the United States and Israel to the table
and have a serious, meaningful discussion about the ways in which it is handling basic
peaceful protests?
LARRY WILKERSON: Sharmini, let me start by saying I want to just amend your remarks a
bit and say that since 1948, when the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint
Chiefs of Staff recommended overwhelmingly to President Harry Truman that he not take
on the burden of 400 million or so Arabs opposed vehemently to the United States by recognizing
the state of Israel, and Truman did it anyway, presidents have tried to maintain a balance.
And I would say that they have succeeded, more or less, in maintaining that balance
all the way up through Ronald Reagan, who you may recall tried to sell and did ultimately
sell F15s and AWACS to Saudi Arabia.
H.W. Bush, his vice president, later president on his own right, H.W. Bush took the Israelis
after the first Gulf War, when he gained some leverage from that war, to Oslo.
Essentially he was the one who set the ground for Madrid and then for Oslo later.
It's only with the entry onto the scene of President Clinton who for the first time,
'95 as I recall, goes to AIPAC, for the very first time an American president at AIPAC,
it's only with the advent of Bill Clinton and then the presidents after him, culminating
in George W. Bush, who again, took a man who the Arab world thought was a bloody minded
killer, Arik Sharon, into the Oval Office and called him a man of peace.
And now we have Donald Trump.
So with Bush, with Clinton to a certain extent, with Obama to a certain extent, with Bush
certainly, and now with Trump we have become Israel's lawyer, we become their horse-holder,
we become the party they turn to to fight their wars if they need be, vis-a-vis Iran,
for example.
We can do no wrong and they can do no wrong in one another's eyes.
That's what we have now.
We have an extremely unbalanced policy, and it's my expectation, full expectation, we're
going to pay for it dearly.
SHARMINI PERIES: Larry, is there a way to bring all sides to the table and have a meaningful
discussion about resolving the conflict at a higher level?
LARRY WILKERSON: I think there is, Sharmini, picking up on your other question's main points.
And there is, but it isn't going to happen with the likes of John Bolton.
I see John Bolton, for example, and I assume Trump picked him at least in part for this
reason, as just as duplicitous as was Douglas Feith in the George Bush administration.
In other words, he's a card-carrying member of the Likud Party.
John Bolton has dual loyalties.
John Bolton was sneaking off to Israel in 2003 and '04 to talk to people like the Mujahedin-e
Khalq, the MEK, in Israel.
Hosted by Israel.
Hosted by Mossad, to talk about such things as Iranian nuclear weapons efforts, which
of course later were completely discounted.
But to build a portfolio of intelligence not unlike that portfolio that suggested Saddam
Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
So this is John Bolton.
I don't know how much power Trump's going to give him.
I hope none at all.
But if he does give him power then it's going to be very difficult to do what I'm now going
to suggest.
There are basically three or four fundamental components to what a balanced U.S. policy
would be, and in my mind a sound and sane U.S. policy.
And you'll see immediately when I articulate these components why I say John Bolton won't
be a part of this.
First and foremost is to more or less compel Israel to change its strategy and its tactics
by telling them that 3.64 billion dollars we give them annually is not going to come
any more.
Not unless they're responsive to U.S. desires, and this includes all the original parameters
of our Middle East policy.
The 1967 borders, the right to return, a two-state solution in general, Jerusalem as the capital
of both Palestine and Israel, and so on.
The second thing you've got to do is be willing to hammer Israel where Israel needs hammering
in conjunction with that threat to cut off funding.
And that's in every manner of the U.S. relationship with Israel, from intelligence sharing on
the one hand, to the kinds of things that we're doing with our private citizens and
so forth on the other hand.
And by that I mean, of course, the rapture-loving Mike Pence-like zealous Christians who aren't
Christians, who constantly talk about the rapture want Armageddon to come, the antichrist
to be identified, and everything to end so that they can go to heaven.
I have no problem with them going to heaven.
I just don't want to go with them and.
I suggest to you that about 95 percent of some 7 billion people on the face of the earth
don't go with them either.
The third component of it would be to bring all the other powers in the region into concert.
And this includes that kingdom over there run by that runaway errant heir apparent Mohammed
bin Salman, now finishing his much-funded trip to the United States.
Getting them to come along with this policy.
Saudi Arabia used to be on this more or less, two-state solution, peace agreement and so
forth policy.
No longer, because they see Israel as a pawn in their game to defeat Iran and make sure
they are the hegemon of the Gulf, and not Iran.
So you've got to bring them along.
You've got to also reach out to other countries that can help you with their good offices,
One of which is Moscow, which is why I despair with the way we're treating Moscow in the
press, in the Congress, in the White House and so forth.
You've got to bring Ankara along.
You've got to have some partners in bringing this pressure to bear on Israel.
And then lastly, you've got a couple yourself, literally couple yourself, to the now almost
65-70 percent of American Jews who increasingly find Netanyahu a despicable individual, who
increasingly find Israel's policies as articulated by Netanyahu as destructive, as even calling
into question how long Israel's going to be around.
And if it is going to be around, is it going to be an apartheid state, because it's certainly
not going to be a democracy, not the way it's headed right now.
And who are very anxious for this prospect or these prospects, and are on our side.
You know, when I say our side I mean this side of justice, the side of peace, the side
of equanimity, the side of balance, the side of doing something in this situation that
looks productive rather than destructive.
You've got to have all those components.
And so now you know, Sharmini, there is no way in the world Donald Trump and John Bolton
are going to put together a policy that remotely resembles what I just said.
They're going to march us off the cliff.
That's what they're going to do.
SHARMINI PERIES: All right.
Let's break this into another segment, and please do join us for our continuing discussion
with Larry Wilkerson about the developments in Palestine between Gaza and the Israeli
border.
-------------------------------------------
Trump announces U.S. will be coming out of Syria soon - Duration: 2:20.
For more infomation >> Trump announces U.S. will be coming out of Syria soon - Duration: 2:20. -------------------------------------------
[Culture] 5 Things You May Not Know About - Florida (US) - Duration: 5:25.
Welcome to The Forking Tomatoes!
Today we're going to learn about five things
you may not know about Florida.
Here we have a native Floridian
Hi, I'm Kaley, I'm, yes, from Florida, Miami,
specifically.
So, first one is...
This one's pretty easy.
They drink it at sports matches?
No!
it's the most popular drink in Florida?
Maybe that's true but that's not what I'm going for.
No!
Okay, so
Gatorade, which is, if you don't know,
a very popular sports drink in all of America, not just Florida, was invented in
Florida, at the University of Florida, which coincidentally is where I went to university.
And it's called Gatorade because the
mascot of the university are the Gators, Gator-ade.
Makes sense.
And I'm pretty sure it's probably the biggest sports drink in the US, if not other countries so
Maybe not.. yeah! I realized when I did this that
Not many Europeans
know about Gatorade but yeah it's pretty big in the States, so...
It's a nice fact about Florida!
km = kilometers
Distance to the sea.
Kind of!
From a specific place
From any place | anywhere.
It's no more than 60 miles to the sea.
Yeah! So no matter where you are
in the state of Florida,
you're never more than 60 miles, which is 95
kilometers, from either ocean,
or the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic Ocean, which is
pretty cool. | Yeah it's pretty cool!
This one you're probably not gonna guess.
It's weird.
They're very common in Florida.
Yeah,
They destroy property.
Also true, sometimes.
They...
are...
protected?
Also true, but
So,
Florida is the only place where...
Okay, you know what an alligator is? | Yeah.
And you know what a crocodile is? | Yeah.
Florida is the only place, I think in the world, where
they exist in the same environment.
There's no other place in the world, I'm
pretty sure or maybe it's just the States,
but I'm pretty sure it's "world",
where alligators and crocodiles live together in the same swamp area
That is pretty cool!
This is a date. | This is a year, yes.
It's when...
a city in Florida was founded?
Yes!
Miami?
No.
It's not so much about...
founding..| which city, but about...
the time...
Okay!
I'll just tell you. | Yeah!
So, 1565 is when
the city of St. Augustine, Florida was founded,
And this is the oldest...
This makes it the oldest city, like settled city, in the United States.
I was kind of close!
You were close, yes!
So it's the oldest city,
so it was before even other, you know, more famous settlements.
And it was by the Spanish.
Didn't know that.
Elevation is...
Florida..
But that would make it... what?
Very flat?
Exactly
So it is...
It is the flattest state in the United States?
Yes! Exactly!
She guessed it, yeah!
It's the flattest state,
Its average elevation is only a
hundred feet above sea level, which is I think
30 kilometres or something...
No! Meters!
Sorry 30 meters or something like that
so it's really flat
No Hills or anything
Like where I'm from in England.
Yeah!
Some of those are below sea level.
Yeah I think England is also very, very flat.
Like... compared to Florida.
That's it.
And that's five things you may not know about Florida.
Are you a Forking Tomatoes virgin?
Well you've got a treat for you.
We've got plenty more videos for you to watch,
AND!
Subscribe to stay updated with all our latest news.
AND!
If you really liked it, please like below!
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét