Thứ Ba, 24 tháng 4, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Apr 24 2018

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had a very rough Monday press conference.

During that press conference, she was pressed repeatedly about a tweet that the president

had sent out Wednesday of the week before, where he referred to a "Breeding concept among

illegal immigrants," allegedly in "Sanctuary cities in the state of California."

So, obviously members of the press wanted some answers.

What does this mean?

What is the president trying to say?

And so they asked Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and her responses were completely what you

would expect from Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Take a look.

Ask you about a tweet that the president put out last week.

He tweeted a lot over the weekend, but last week he was talking about sanctuary cities

in California and saying "There's a revolution going on in California.

So many sanctuary areas want out of this ridiculous crime invested and breeding concept."

We haven't had a chance to ask you about that tweet.

When he used the word breeding, was he making a derogatory term about Latino's in California

that they breed a lot, or that they're prone to breeding?

No, he's talking about the problem itself, growing and getting bigger.

[inaudible 00:01:15].

Sorry, I've answered a couple.

I want to follow up on [inaudible 00:01:18].

When you said breeding, the president was very clear in his statement about this issue,

he said in a tweet "There's a revolution going on in California.

So many sanctuary areas want out of this ridiculous crime invested and breeding concept."

What did he mean by breeding?

Again, the president has recognized that this is a major problem, and a lot of people, even

in California, want to see the issue of sanctuary cities addressed.

And the president's doing what he can to do that.

But what does breeding mean to this president?

Because when you think of breeding, you think of animals breeding, populating.

I'm not going to begin to think what you think.

Certainly, I think that it can mean a lot of things to a lot of people.

But the president's talking about a growing problem and I addressed that with Jim, I don't

have anything else to add.

Just one quick question.

I want you just to define what the president meant about breeding.

To be specific, he's not talking about people having babies, yes?

Not that I'm aware of, I'd have to ask him to dig into that deeper.

[inaudible 00:02:19].

I just said not that I'm aware of, and I would have to ask him to be more specific.

One of the greatest parts about those clips is the fact that she just gets increasingly

more frustrated as the questions continue, until she's eventually like you know what,

I don't know, I don't know.

I don't know what the hell this guy meant, I don't even like my job, I don't want to

be here.

Can I just go now?

I mean yeah, she didn't say that, but you can hear it in that voice.

She is so pissed off about what the president says on Twitter, because she is the one that

has to go out there and try to interpret it for the press in a way that's going to both

appease members of the press, and the president himself.

Because if she says the wrong thing, if she misinterprets what he's trying to say, she's

going to lose her job.

And in this particular instance, there's really not a whole lot you can say.

That term breeding concept was meant by the president to invoke an image of animals.

These people are not actually people to him.

And he can try to play it off, she can try to play it off, but we know what he meant

and why he used that term.

This is dog whistle politics folks, normally Donald Trump is a little bit more overt with

it, but this time he decided to play it cool, and it worked.

But Sarah Huckabee Sanders, if you want to watch the full press conference.

There's also one point where somebody asks as a follow up "I want to ask you about another

one of Donald Trump's tweets."

And she just rolls her eyes and looks away for a moment.

It's hilarious, this woman hates her job.

She hates having to go out there every single day and defend these insane tweet by the president

of the United States.

But she believes in them, she believes in the things she's out there saying.

She believes the things her crazy father says on Fox News.

So I have no sympathy for her whatsoever.

If she actually hated this job, she could easily walk away and go find a new position,

possibly on the Fox and Friends couch, as a regular contributor.

But instead, she's making the choice to go out there every day and be confronted by an

angry public that wants to know what the hell the president is talking about.

For more infomation >> Sarah Huckabee Sanders Admits She Has NO Clue What Trump Is Talking About - Duration: 4:45.

-------------------------------------------

[KPOP IN PUBLIC] TWICE (트와이스) - What Is Love? | Dance Cover - Duration: 4:36.

did you said TWICE?

Had to stop my bike riding for watch this

let's go, friend, it's late!

For more infomation >> [KPOP IN PUBLIC] TWICE (트와이스) - What Is Love? | Dance Cover - Duration: 4:36.

-------------------------------------------

Who Was The Smiling Man? - Duration: 3:23.

The smiling man is a well known story posted on reddit by the user Blue Tidal.

It details an encounter with a creepy, dancing man that crossed the path of a Seattle resident.

Based on the account, the author claims that the smiling man was a real person.

So who was he?

Or what was he?

Today, life's biggest questions asks, who was the smiling man?

Hello and welcome back to life's biggest questions, I'm charlotte dobre.

Don't forget to like and subscribe and let us know in those comments a question you have

always wanted to know the answer to.

For those who have never heard of the smiling man, here's a brief explanation.

The smiling man is a true story about a reddit user who goes by Blue tidal, that used to

spend boring nights walking around seattle thinking.

He did this for 4 years without fear, until one Wednesday night.

He was walking by a park.

As it was night time, no one else was around, until he turned a corner and went down a side

street.

He saw the silhouette of a man dancing a strange dance toward him.

Similar to a waltz, but the man finished each box with a stride.

As he got closer, the author could make out a strange, wide smile on his face.

His eyes were looking up at the sky.

He felt unnerved so he crossed the street, leaving the smiling man on the other side.

But when he looked back, the smiling man had crossed the street with him but was not slightly

crouched down and facing him.

He stood for a while until the smiling man started moving toward him, taking long exaggerated

tip toe steps like a cartoon characrer.

The smiling man began to speed up, He stopped, a car length away.

still smiling, still staring up at the sky, avoiding eye contact.

The author yelled 'what do you want', but instead of answering the smiling man just

smiled.

Shortly after, he turned around and started dance walking away, only to turn back around

and start running.

That's when blue tidal started running as fast as he could, to an area that was better

lit.

Blue tidal never went for another walk alone at night again.

Spooky right?

Its even better when you read the story or watch the short film 2 am.

So, who was the smiling man?

According to the author, the smiling man was a middle aged Caucasian man.

He had dark hair and he was between 6'2 and 6'5.

He was wearing a dark suit, black or charcoal grey, and it looked outddated.

He had no facial hair, and a slender face.

Not hansome.

Not ugly.

He had an intensity to his eyes, but never made eye contact.

And lastly, he had a wide, ear to ear smile glued on his face that seemed almost inhuman.

What possible motivation could he have had for wanting to scare someone else?

The author, who doesn't believe in the supernatural, said the smiling man must have been an insane

person.

But the way he moved around seemed somewhat otherworldly.

The author also claims to have had several dreams about the smiling man following the

encounter, but he believes they are unrelated.

Since the original story was posted several years ago, others have come forward with similar

tales of encounters with beings that resembled the smiling man.

Tall, slender, doing a creepy dance and staring at the sky. and of course, smiling.

According to one encounter, who got extremely close to him, The smiling mans' breath was

cold.

Ice cold.

So who was the smiling man?

Maybe he was just a regular dude, getting a kick out of scaring people.

Maybe he was mentally unstable, maybe he was under the influence.

Maybe we will never know.

For now, I'm charlotte dobre and you'e been watching life's biggest questions.

For more infomation >> Who Was The Smiling Man? - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

WAFFLE HOUSE SHOOTER Travis Reinking Thought Taylor Swift Was Stalking Him! | What's Trending Now! - Duration: 5:18.

Travis Reinking, the suspected gunman who opened fire at a Waffle House restaurant in

Antioch, Tennessee on Sunday, killing four people, apparently thought Taylor Swift was

stalking him.

Welcome back to What's Trending, I'm Shira Lazar.

Be sure to like this video and subscribe for more social media news daily.

Reinking is accused of entering the Waffle House on Murfreesboro Pike near Nashville

at 3:25 am on Sunday morning, and opening fire with an AR-15 rifle.

At about 3:25 in the morning, police say that Travis Reinking came into the Waffle House

parking lot, he was in his pick-up truck, he was nude, with the exception of wearing

a green jacket, and had an AR-15 style weapon with him.

After a 2-day-long manhunt, he was apprehended by police around 1:00 pm local time on Monday

afternoon.

According to police reports from 2016, Reinking thought Swift had hacked into his phone and

Netflix accounts.

In a prior interview with police, he even said that he had chased Taylor Swift up onto

the roof of a Dairy Queen.

Reinking's parents, Jeff and Judith, say that Travis had been experiencing delusions

since 2014.

In 2016, they called the police to a CVS parking lot in Morton, Illinois, because Travis had

been making suicidal threats and owned firearms.

The following year, in June 2017, he threatened someone with an AR-15 while wearing a pink

dress, then drove to a public pool, dove in, and then tried to have a naked fight with

a lifeguard.

Only one month later, he was arrested at the White House after jumping over a barrier trying

to meet President Trump.

And it was after all of these incidents in August 2017, that he was forced to give up

all of his guns, including the AR-15 he used to carry out the shooting at the Waffle House.

According to police in Illinois, Travis's father Jeff Reinking was allowed to hold onto

the weapons since he had a valid license.

Jeff Reinking told police he would keep the guns safe and away from his son.

At this point, however, authorities believe Jeff willingly gave the weapons back to

Travis.

Travis had recently moved to Nashville, where it wasn't illegal to have deadly weapons in

his possession there.

And just days before the shooting, he stole a BMW from a dealership, leading police on

a brief chase before escaping.

"Police used the car's GPS to track it to Reinking's apartment complex," but somehow,

did not identify him as a suspect.

The gun used to commit the murders was a Bushmaster XM-15.

Bushmaster, by the way, proudly states on its Twitter that it is the "leading supplier

of AR15 type rifles in the United States."

I mean clearly there's something wrong here, there's a disconnect.

Either we're not doing enough to address gun issues in America or mental health issues

or both for someone this disturbed who's been arrested multiple times including at the White

House and yet this guy has the ability to carry and possess an AR-15.

Basically, a weapon of mass murder.

The other weapons given to Travis's father for safekeeping were a Kimber 9 millimeter

handgun, a CZ-USA .22 caliber rifle and a Remington 710, plus ammunition.

Travis Reinking hadn't posted anything publicly on Facebook since March 2017, since this video

with the caption: "The Illuminati Is Real."

The contents of that video are unknown – it's since been removed from YouTube for violating

their policy on harassment and bullying.

If this whole story doesn't make you feel like something needs to change here in America,

I don't know what can.

And now let's turn our attention over to the victims.

They were all people of color under 30 years old.

Taurean Sanderlin was a 29-year-old employee of Waffle House.

He was shot in the parking lot after Reinking got out of his truck.

21-year-old DeEbony Groves was a student at Belmont University majoring in social work.

She was also remembered as a tenacious basketball player at Gallatin High School.

20-year-old Joe Perez was a patron at the restaurant who was also shot in the parking

lot.

Joe's mother wrote on Facebook: "Me, my husband and sons are broken right now with

this loss.

Our lives are shattered."

Akilah Dasilva was studying musical engineering at Middle Tennessee State University.

He was shot inside the restaurant and later died at the hospital.

He was 23.

A GoFundMe page has been set up in Akilah's honor.

Akilah's girlfriend, 21-year-old Shanita Waggoner, was also shot in the restaurant

and has undergone surgery in an attempt to save her leg.

29-year-old James Shaw Jr., another patron at the restaurant, is being hailed as a hero

for grabbing Reinking's gun and wrestling it away.

I grabbed him and I grabbed the gun.

I started hitting and punching and doing anything I could to get the gun ajar.

Just kind of grabbed it from him, I lifted it real high and I just tossed it over the

counter.

What was everybody else doing?

Ducking, hiding for cover and I can't blame anybody.

Shaw was grazed by a bullet and burned his hand when he grabbed the hot barrel of the

Bushmaster XM-15.

Now that Travis Reinking is in custody, hopefully we can get more answers around his motive

and find out why his father gave him back those guns.

So what do you think?

With all the red flags around Reinking's behavior, should it have been this easy to

get a gun in his hands?

Let us know in the comments below, and be sure to like and subscribe for more of What's

Trending.

For more infomation >> WAFFLE HOUSE SHOOTER Travis Reinking Thought Taylor Swift Was Stalking Him! | What's Trending Now! - Duration: 5:18.

-------------------------------------------

What Is the Incel Movement? 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | SML TV - Duration: 9:24.

What Is the Incel Movement? 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Screengrab via YouTube The 2014 Isla Vista shooter Elliot Rodger.

An apparent social media posting has linked the man accused of killing ten people with a van in Toronto with a controversial celibacy movement.

On April 23, ten people were killed and 16 others injured when a man driving a white van drove into a crowd in North York, Toronto.

Alek Minassian, 25, was arrested at the scene.

Shortly after Minassian's name was made public, a Facebook post spread online that was apparently written by the suspect.

The posting read, "Private (Recruit) Minassian Infantry 00010, wishing to speak to Sgt.

4chan please. C23249161.

The Incel Rebellion has already begun! We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys! All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!" The posting has not been confirmed as legitimate.

It was posted on the same day as the van incident.

The writing makes reference to Elliot Rodger.

In May 2014, Rodger, 22, shot and killed six people while injuring 14 others before committing suicide close to the campus of the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Prior to his rampage, Rodger posted a video on YouTube titled, "Elliot Rodger's Retribution." Rodger made the claims that he was killing women because he was a virgin and was targeting sexually active men.

As a result, Rodger was considered a member of the Incel Movement, a movement for people who feel they are victims of enforced celibacy.

Here's what you need to know:.

A Subreddit for the Incel Movement Was Removed in 2017 Due to Gross Misogyny.

The Guardian reported in November 2017 that Reddit had banned a subreddit named, Incels.

At the time it was removed, there were over 40,000 members of the page.

A common theme on those Reddit pages were "Chads," men who have casual sex with women.

A Change.

org petition that spread in the summer of 2017 accused the group of advocating rape with titles of pages on subreddit including, "All women are sluts" and "Reasons why women are the embodiment of evil.

The Guardian report adds that users on the subreddit who were viewed as too friendly to women were warned and subsequently banned if their behavior didn't degenerate.

Women were commonly referred to as "Femoids" on the page.

Many Incel Movement Reddit Users Were Also Active on Alt-Right Pages.

According to a study from Grinnell College on the Incel Movement, another common name for women on the site is "Stacy." The study reads, "The female counterpart of a Chad is called a "Stacy," and she is viewed as unattainable.

Incels talk about Chads in a reverent way, while talking about Stacies in a hateful way.

They strive to be Chads, but demean the Stacies Chad is allegedly having sex with.".

The Grinnell study adds that many in the Incel Movement subreddit were also active in alt-right pages such as "The Red Pill," "Mens Rights" and "Men Going Their Own Way." A Quartz piece included words such as "femoids" and "Chad" as being part of a new alt-right dictionary.

That same article mentions that some on the subreddit referred to Elliot Rodger as "Saint Elliot" because he "martyred" himself for the Incel cause.

Despite the Misogyny, the Incel Movement Was Started by a Woman.

Despite the misogyny associated with the group, it was a woman who says she started the movement.

A Canadian woman named Alana told Elle Magazine in March 2016 that she started the Incel Movement in 1993.

Alana said that after thinking she was heterosexual but then dating and breaking up with a woman, she wanted to try "to create a movement that was open to anybody and everybody.".

Alana then built an early website named, "Alana's Involuntary Celibacy Project." Alana said that the page was populated with stories from women but mainly men.

The article says that the men "were prone to antagonistic, repetitive complaining, she truly wanted her project to be a home for all incels; rigid gender norms, she thought, burdened every- one.".

When Alana learned of Elliot Rodger's connection to the movement, she told Elle about her thoughts, "Like a scientist who invented something that ended up being a weapon of war, I can't uninvent this word, nor restrict it to the nicer people who need it.

One Incel Activist Believes that the Members of the Movement Should Be Viewed as a Gender.

A former site admin for IncelSupport, Rebecca Freeman, wrote on Quora that the group is "not a movement; we have never protested or made any request for rights — or anything like that.

We do not much resemble the stereotypes and tropes many feminist groups like to use against us.".

Freeman added that "likely some biological cause.

Therefore, I think we should be viewed as a type of gender." In her conclusion, Freeman wrote, "It's worth remembering that Adolf Hitler had a partner.

So did many well known serial killers and rapists.

They were not dangerous because of sexual frustration or an inability to fit in.

They were simply evil people.".

'There Is Not That Much Difference' Between Incels & Those Who Are Just Love-Shy.

A website named Love-Shy.

com, offers "support for the dating-challenged.

" In an FAQ section to help users determine if they are incels or love shy, a passage reads, "The suffering of incels is often the same as those of love-shys.

" The difference, according to that section, is that incel people view themselves as being further away from the social mainstream.

Another passage reads, " It is possible for a person to be both incel and love-shy, and most are both, and most are both to some degree or another.

For instance, a person could originally be incel, then suffer large numbers of turn downs, and eventually become love-shy and unable to approach.".

For more infomation >> What Is the Incel Movement? 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | SML TV - Duration: 9:24.

-------------------------------------------

13 Semi Trucks Intentionally Block Freeway After Seeing Who Was Coming – Now Cops Are Involved - Duration: 2:32.

13 Semi Trucks Intentionally Block Freeway After Seeing Who Was Coming – Now Cops Are

Involved.

Today in the early morning hours, a call came into law enforcement that there was a problem

on a Highway near Detriot Michigan.

What happened next left onlookers in complete disbelief.

Sometimes, when situations are dire you have to come up with extreme ideas, that's exactly

what the Michigan State Police did.

Not all heroes wear capes, some drive big trucks.

According to Love What Matters, An incredible moment happened this morning as 13 semi trucks

parked under a highway overpass in Detroit to save a man considering suicide.

The Michigan State Police came up with the clever solution to shorten the fall for the

man who was threatening suicide, according to local FOX station WJBK.

They organized multiple semi truck drivers to remain in place to shorten the distance

the man would fall, if he were to jump.

The first call came in to report the suicidal man shortly before 1 a.m. Tuesday, the station

reports.

Thankfully, the man did not jump.

The situation ended with the man safely walking off the bridge.

He was later by taken by local law enforcement to the Beaumont hospital for evaluation, according

to WJBK.

Several local law enforcement agencies were reportedly on the scene with negotiators speaking

to the man for several hours before the situation ended peacefully.

It's great when you see, police working hand in hand with citizens to save the life

of someone in need.

Today this guy just wanted to end his life, but traffic was stopped and 13 heroes were

utilized to keep the man safe.

Truck drivers are often given a bad wrap.

You always read stories about sex trafficking at truck stops and drug use.

But the majority of the men and women are great people that are willing to help when

needed.

Thanks to the quick thinking of law enforcement and willing truck drivers, a man's life

was saved.

If you or a loved one is feeling distressed, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.

The crisis center provides free and confidential emotional support 24 hours a day, 7 days a

week for civilians and veterans.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today

For more infomation >> 13 Semi Trucks Intentionally Block Freeway After Seeing Who Was Coming – Now Cops Are Involved - Duration: 2:32.

-------------------------------------------

What is an Executive Education Custom Program? - Duration: 1:29.

(upbeat music)

I'm Ron Soos, I'm a Principle Business

Training Specialist at Tesoro Corporation.

We approached the Executive Education school looking

for a solution for some of our middle leaders,

some of our middle managers

and with respect to their strategic leadership.

We have a lot of issues around the companies,

up and down the chain of command

with respect to understanding how to,

what we call it, raise your gaze.

Going from a more tactical approach

to leadership and management of others

into a more strategic view, a more holistic

and wider range view of the company,

and of their part of the organization,

and of their leadership in general.

We find that in different parts of the business,

different leaders will understand their particular piece

and their business unit,

then won't have good holistic

and wide range view of the whole company overall,

and so we use lots of different case studies

and we have them go through simulations

and that kind of thing, to have a very general understanding

of business and business strategy

so that they, themselves can make that connection

between what they do in their own business unit

and what they do on their own teams

and how it's relevant to our company overall

and then how that's relevant to all business

and all sort of decisions

that are made on a strategic level.

We are very happy with how things are going so far.

We're getting a lot of good anecdotal response

around the organization about people happy

with what they have learned here

and they're really able to put it to use,

and so we're going to take advantage of that

as much as we can.

(upbeat music)

For more infomation >> What is an Executive Education Custom Program? - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

What was Benjamin Jonson | Benjamin Jonson's Life & Works - Duration: 55:59.

Benjamin Jonson was an English playwright, poet, actor, and literary critic, whose artistry

exerted a lasting impact upon English poetry and stage comedy. He popularised the comedy

of humours. He is best known for the satirical plays Every Man in His Humour, Volpone, or

The Fox, The Alchemist and Bartholomew Fair and for his lyric and epigrammatic poetry;

he is generally regarded as the second most important English playwright during the reign

of James VI and I after William Shakespeare. Jonson was a classically educated, well-read

and cultured man of the English Renaissance with an appetite for controversy (personal

and political, artistic and intellectual) whose cultural influence was of unparalleled

breadth upon the playwrights and the poets of the Jacobean era and of the Caroline era.

Early life: In midlife, Jonson claimed that his paternal

grandfather was a member of the extended Johnston family of Annandale in the Scottish borders,

a genealogy that is attested by the three spindles (rhombi) in the Jonson family coat

of arms: one spindle is a diamond-shaped heraldic device used by the Johnston family. Jonson's

clergyman father died two months before his birth; his mother married a master bricklayer

two years later. Jonson attended school in St. Martin's Lane. Later, a family friend

paid for his studies at Westminster School, where the antiquarian, historian, topographer

and officer of arms, William Camden (1551–1623) was one of his masters. In the event, the

pupil and the master became friends, and the intellectual influence of Camden's broad-ranging

scholarship upon Jonson's art and literary style remained notable, until Camden's death

in 1623. On leaving Westminster School, Jonson was

to have attended the University of Cambridge, to continue his book learning but did not,

because of his unwilled apprenticeship to his bricklayer stepfather. According to the

churchman and historian Thomas Fuller (1608–61), Jonson at this time built a garden wall in

Lincoln's Inn. After having been an apprentice bricklayer, Ben Jonson went to the Netherlands

and volunteered to soldier with the English regiments of Francis Vere(1560–1609) in

Flanders. The Hawthornden Manuscripts (1619), of the

conversations between Ben Jonson and the poet William Drummond of Hawthornden (1585–1649),

report that, when in Flanders, Jonson engaged, fought and killed an enemy soldier in single

combat, and took for trophies the weapons of the vanquished soldier. After his military

activity on the Continent, Jonson returned to England and worked as an actor and as a

playwright. As an actor, Jonson was the protagonist "Hieronimo" (Geronimo) in the play The

Spanish Tragedy (ca. 1586), by Thomas Kyd (1558–94), the first revenge tragedy in

English literature. Moreover, by 1597, he was a working playwright employed by Philip

Henslowe, the leading producer for the English public theatre; by the next year, the production

of Every Man in His Humour (1598) had established Jonson's reputation as a dramatist.

Regarding his marriage Jonson described his wife to William Drummond as "a shrew, yet

honest". The identity of Jonson's wife has always been obscure, yet she sometimes is

identified as "Ann Lewis", the woman who married a Benjamin Jonson in 1594, at the church of

St Magnus-the-Martyr, near London Bridge.Concerning the family of Anne Lewis and Ben Jonson, the

St. Martin's Church registers indicate that Mary Jonson, their eldest daughter, died in

November 1593, at six months of age. Then a decade later, in 1603, Benjamin Jonson,

their eldest son, died of Bubonic plague when he was seven years old; to lament and honour

the dead boy, Benjamin Jonson père wrote the elegiac On My First Sonne (1603). Moreover,

32 years later, a second son, also named Benjamin Jonson, died in 1635. In that period, Ann

Lewis and Ben Jonson lived separate lives for five years; their matrimonial arrangement

cast Ann Lewis as the housewife Jonson, and Ben Jonson as the artist who enjoyed the residential

hospitality of his patrons, Sir Robert Townshend and Lord Aubigny, Esme Stuart, 3rd Duke of

Lennox. Career:

By summer 1597, Jonson had a fixed engagement in the Admiral's Men, then performing under

Philip Henslowe's management at The Rose. John Aubrey reports, on uncertain authority,

that Jonson was not successful as an actor; whatever his skills as an actor, he was evidently

more valuable to the company as a writer. By this time Jonson had begun to write original

plays for the Admiral's Men; in 1598 he was mentioned by Francis Meres in his Palladis

Tamia as one of "the best for tragedy." None of his early tragedies survive, however. An

undated comedy, The Case is Altered, may be his earliest surviving play.

In 1597 a play which he co-wrote with Thomas Nashe, The Isle of Dogs, was suppressed after

causing great offence. Arrest warrants for Jonson and Nashe were issued by Queen Elizabeth

I's so-called interrogator, Richard Topcliffe. Jonson was jailed in Marshalsea Prison and

charged with "Leude and mutynous behaviour", while Nashe managed to escape to Great Yarmouth.

Two of the actors, Gabriel Spenser and Robert Shaw, were also imprisoned. A year later,

Jonson was again briefly imprisoned, this time in Newgate Prison, for killing Gabriel

Spenser in a duel on 22 September 1598 in Hogsden Fields (today part of Hoxton). Tried

on a charge of manslaughter, Jonson pleaded guilty but was released by benefit of clergy,

a legal ploy through which he gained leniency by reciting a brief bible verse (the neck-verse),

forfeiting his 'goods and chattels' and being branded on his left thumb. While in jail Jonson

converted to Catholicism, possibly through the influence of fellow-prisoner Father Thomas

Wright, a Jesuit priest. In 1598 Jonson produced his first great success,

Every Man in His Humour, capitalising on the vogue for humorous plays which George Chapman

had begun with An Humorous Day's Mirth. William Shakespeare was among the first actors to

be cast. Jonson followed this in 1599 with Every Man out of His Humour, a pedantic attempt

to imitate Aristophanes. It is not known whether this was a success on stage, but when published

it proved popular and went through several editions.

Jonson's other work for the theatre in the last years of Elizabeth I's reign was marked

by fighting and controversy. Cynthia's Revels was produced by the Children of the Chapel

Royal at Blackfriars Theatre in 1600. It satirised both John Marston, who Jonson believed had

accused him of lustfulness in Histriomastix, and Thomas Dekker. Jonson attacked the two

poets again in Poetaster (1601). Dekker responded with Satiromastix, subtitled "the untrussing

of the humorous poet". The final scene of this play, whilst certainly not to be taken

at face value as a portrait of Jonson, offers a caricature that is recognisable from Drummond's

report – boasting about himself and condemning other poets, criticising performances of his

plays and calling attention to himself in any available way.

This "War of the Theatres" appears to have ended with reconciliation on all sides. Jonson

collaborated with Dekker on a pageant welcoming James I to England in 1603 although Drummond

reports that Jonson called Dekker a rogue. Marston dedicated The Malcontent to Jonson

and the two collaborated with Chapman on Eastward Ho, a 1605 play whose anti-Scottish sentiment

briefly landed both Jonson and Chapman in jail.

Royal patronage: At the beginning of the reign of James I,

King of England, in 1603 Jonson joined other poets and playwrights in welcoming the new

king. Jonson quickly adapted himself to the additional demand for masques and entertainments

introduced with the new reign and fostered by both the king and his consort Anne of Denmark.

In addition to his popularity on the public stage and in the royal hall, he enjoyed the

patronage of aristocrats such as Elizabeth Sidney (daughter of Sir Philip Sidney) and

Lady Mary Wroth. This connection with the Sidney family provided the impetus for one

of Jonson's most famous lyrics, the country house poem To Penshurst.

In February 1603 John Manningham reported that Jonson was living on Robert Townsend,

son of Sir Roger Townshend, and "scorns the world." Perhaps this explains why his trouble

with English authorities continued. That same year he was questioned by the Privy Council

about Sejanus, a politically themed play about corruption in the Roman Empire. He was again

in trouble for topical allusions in a play, now lost, in which he took part. Shortly after

his release from a brief spell of imprisonment imposed to mark the authorities' displeasure

at the work, in the second week of October 1605, he was present at a supper party attended

by most of the Gunpowder Plot conspirators. After the plot's discovery he appears to have

avoided further imprisonment; he volunteered what he knew of the affair to the investigator

Robert Ceciland the Privy Council. Father Thomas Wright, who heard Fawkes's confession,

was known to Jonson from prison in 1598 and Cecil may have directed him to bring the priest

before the council, as a witness.(Teague, 249).

At the same time, Jonson pursued a more prestigious career, writing masques for James's court.

The Satyr (1603) and The Masque of Blackness (1605) are two of about two dozen masques

which Jonson wrote for James or for Queen Anne, some of them performed at Apethorpe

Palace when the King was in residence. The Masque of Blacknesswas praised by Algernon

Charles Swinburne as the consummate example of this now-extinct genre, which mingled speech,

dancing and spectacle. On many of these projects he collaborated,

not always peacefully, with designer Inigo Jones. For example, Jones designed the scenery

for Jonson's masque Oberon, the Faery Prince performed at Whitehall on 1 January 1611 in

which Prince Henry, eldest son of James I, appeared in the title role. Perhaps partly

as a result of this new career, Jonson gave up writing plays for the public theatres for

a decade. He later told Drummond that he had made less than two hundred pounds on all his

plays together. In 1616 Jonson received a yearly pension of

100 marks (about £60), leading some to identify him as England's first Poet Laureate. This

sign of royal favour may have encouraged him to publish the first volume of the folio collected

edition of his works that year. Other volumes followed in 1640–41 and 1692. (See: Ben

Jonson folios) In 1618 Jonson set out for his ancestral Scotland

on foot. He spent over a year there, and the best-remembered hospitality which he enjoyed

was that of the Scottish poet, William Drummond of Hawthornden, in April 1619, sited on the

River Esk. Drummond undertook to record as much of Jonson's conversation as he could

in his diary, and thus recorded aspects of Jonson's personality that would otherwise

have been less clearly seen. Jonson delivers his opinions, in Drummond's terse reporting,

in an expansive and even magisterial mood. Drummond noted he was "a great lover and praiser

of himself, a contemner and scorner of others". In Edinburgh, Jonson is recorded as staying

with a John Stuart of Leith. While there he was made an honorary citizen of Edinburgh.

On returning to England, he was awarded an honorary Master of Arts degree from Oxford

University. From Edinburgh he travelled west and lodged

with the Duke of Lennox where he wrote a play based on Loch Lomond.

The period between 1605 and 1620 may be viewed as Jonson's heyday. By 1616 he had produced

all the plays on which his present reputation as a dramatist is based, including the tragedy

Catiline (acted and printed 1611), which achieved limited success and the comedies Volpone (acted

1605 and printed in 1607), Epicoene, or the Silent Woman (1609), The Alchemist (1610),

Bartholomew Fair (1614) and The Devil is an Ass (1616). The Alchemist and Volpone were

immediately successful. Of Epicoene, Jonson told Drummond of a satirical verse which reported

that the play's subtitle was appropriate, since its audience had refused to applaud

the play (i.e., remained silent). Yet Epicoene, along with Bartholomew Fair and (to a lesser

extent) The Devil is an Ass have in modern times achieved a certain degree of recognition.

While his life during this period was apparently more settled than it had been in the 1590s,

his financial security was still not assured. Religion:

Jonson recounted that his father had been a prosperous Protestant landowner until the

reign of "Bloody Mary" and had suffered imprisonment and the forfeiture of his wealth during that

monarch's attempt to restore England to Catholicism. On Elizabeth's accession he was freed and

was able to travel to London to become a clergyman. (All we know of Jonson's father, who died

a month before his son was born, comes from the poet's own narrative.) Jonson's elementary

education was in a small church school attached to St Martin-in-the-Fields parish, and at

the age of about seven he secured a place at Westminster School, then part of Westminster

Abbey. Notwithstanding this emphatically Protestant

grounding, Jonson maintained an interest in Catholic doctrine throughout his adult life

and, at a particularly perilous time while a religious war with Spain was widely expected

and persecution of Catholics was intensifying, he converted to the faith. This took place

in October 1598, while Jonson was on remand in Newgate Gaol charged with manslaughter.

Jonson's biographer Ian Donaldson is among those who suggest that the conversion was

instigated by Father Thomas Wright, a Jesuit priest who had resigned from the order over

his acceptance of Queen Elizabeth's right to rule in England. Wright, although placed

under house arrest on the orders of Lord Burghley, was permitted to minister to the inmates of

London prisons. It may have been that Jonson, fearing that his trial would go against him,

was seeking the unequivocal absolution that Catholicism could offer if he were sentenced

to death. Alternatively, he could have been looking to personal advantage from accepting

conversion since Father Wright's protector, the Earl of Essex, was among those who might

hope to rise to influence after the succession of a new monarch. Jonson's conversion came

at a weighty time in affairs of state; the royal succession, from the childless Elizabeth,

had not been settled and Essex's Catholic allies were hopeful that a sympathetic ruler

might attain the throne. Conviction, and certainly not expedience alone,

sustained Jonson's faith during the troublesome twelve years he remained a Catholic. His stance

received attention beyond the low-level intolerance to which most followers of that faith were

exposed. The first draft of his play Sejanus was banned for "popery", and did not re-appear

until some offending passages were cut. In January 1606 he (with Anne, his wife) appeared

before the Consistory Court in London to answer a charge of recusancy, with Jonson alone additionally

accused of allowing his fame as a Catholic to "seduce" citizens to the cause. This was

a serious matter (the Gunpowder Plot was still fresh in mind) but he explained that his failure

to take communion was only because he had not found sound theological endorsement for

the practice, and by paying a fine of thirteen shillings (65p) he escaped the more serious

penalties at the authorities' disposal. His habit was to slip outside during the sacrament,

a common routine at the time—indeed it was one followed by the royal consort, Queen Anne,

herself—to show political loyalty while not offending the conscience. Leading church

figures, including John Overall, Dean of St Paul's, were tasked with winning Jonson back

to orthodoxy, but these overtures were resisted. In May 1610 Henry IV of France was assassinated,

purportedly in the name of the Pope; he had been a Catholic monarch respected in England

for tolerance towards Protestants, and his murder seems to have been the immediate cause

of Jonson's decision to rejoin the Church of England. He did this in flamboyant style,

pointedly drinking a full chalice of communion wine at the eucharist to demonstrate his renunciation

of the Catholic rite, in which the priest alone drinks the wine. The exact date of the

ceremony is unknown. However, his interest in Catholic belief and practice remained with

him until his death. Decline and death:

Jonson's productivity began to decline in the 1620s, but he remained well known. In

that time, rose to the prominence the Sons of Ben or the "Tribe of Ben" - those younger

poets such as Robert Herrick, Richard Lovelace, and Sir John Suckling who took their bearing

in verse from Jonson. However, a series of setbacks drained his strength and damaged

his reputation. He resumed writing regular plays in the 1620s, but these are not considered

among his best. They are of significant interest, however, for their portrayal of Charles I's

England. The Staple of News, for example, offers a remarkable look at the earliest stage

of English journalism. The lukewarm reception given that play was, however, nothing compared

to the dismal failure of The New Inn; the cold reception given this play prompted Jonson

to write a poem condemning his audience (the Ode to Myself), which in turn prompted Thomas

Carew, one of the "Tribe of Ben," to respond in a poem that asks Jonson to recognise his

own decline. The principal factor in Jonson's partial eclipse

was, however, the death of James and the accession of King Charles I in 1625. Jonson felt neglected

by the new court. A decisive quarrel with Jones harmed his career as a writer of court

masques, although he continued to entertain the court on an irregular basis. For his part,

Charles displayed a certain degree of care for the great poet of his father's day: he

increased Jonson's annual pension to £100 and included a tierce of wine and beer.

Despite the strokes that he suffered in the 1620s, Jonson continued to write. At his death

in 1637 he seems to have been working on another play, The Sad Shepherd. Though only two acts

are extant, this represents a remarkable new direction for Jonson: a move into pastoral

drama. During the early 1630s he also conducted a correspondence with James Howell, who warned

him about disfavour at court in the wake of his dispute with Jones.

Jonson died on 6 August 1637 and his funeral was held on 9 August. He is buried in the

north aisle of the nave in Westminster Abbey, with the inscription "O Rare Ben Johnson " set

in the slab over his grave. John Aubrey, in a more meticulous record than usual, notes

that a passer-by, John Young of Great Milton, Oxfordshire, saw the bare grave marker and

on impulse paid a workman eighteen pence to make the inscription. Another theory suggests

that the tribute came from William Davenant, Jonson's successor as Poet Laureate (and card-playing

companion of Young), as the same phrase appears on Davenant's nearby gravestone, but essayist

Leigh Hunt contends that Davenant's wording represented no more than Young's coinage,

cheaply re-used. The fact that Jonson was buried in an upright position was an indication

of his reduced circumstances at the time of his death, although it has also been written

that he asked for a grave exactly 18 inches square from the monarch and received an upright

grave to fit in the requested space. It has been claimed that the inscription could

be read "Orare Ben Jonson" (pray for Ben Jonson), possibly in an allusion to Jonson's acceptance

of Catholic doctrine during his lifetime (although he had returned to the Church of England)

but the carving shows a distinct space between "O" and "rare".

A monument to Jonson was erected in about 1723 by the Earl of Oxford and is in the eastern

aisle of Westminster Abbey's Poets' Corner. It includes a portrait medallion and the same

inscription as on the gravestone. It seems Jonson was to have had a monument erected

by subscription soon after his death but the English Civil War intervened.

His work: Drama:

Apart from two tragedies, Sejanus and Catiline, that largely failed to impress Renaissance

audiences, Jonson's work for the public theatres was in comedy. These plays vary in some respects.

The minor early plays, particularly those written for boy players, present somewhat

looser plots and less-developed characters than those written later, for adult companies.

Already in the plays which were his salvos in the Poet's War, he displays the keen eye

for absurdity and hypocrisy that marks his best-known plays; in these early efforts,

however, plot mostly takes second place to variety of incident and comic set-pieces.

They are, also, notably ill-tempered. Thomas Davies called Poetaster "a contemptible mixture

of the serio-comic, where the names of Augustus Caesar, Maecenas, Virgil, Horace, Ovid and

Tibullus, are all sacrificed upon the altar of private resentment." Another early comedy

in a different vein, The Case is Altered, is markedly similar to Shakespeare's romantic

comedies in its foreign setting, emphasis on genial wit and love-plot. Henslowe's diary

indicates that Jonson had a hand in numerous other plays, including many in genres such

as English history with which he is not otherwise associated.

The comedies of his middle career, from Eastward Ho to The Devil is an Ass are for the most

part city comedy, with a London setting, themes of trickery and money, and a distinct moral

ambiguity, despite Jonson's professed aim in the Prologue to Volpone to "mix profit

with your pleasure". His late plays or "dotages", particularly The Magnetic Lady and The Sad

Shepherd, exhibit signs of an accommodation with the romantic tendencies of Elizabethan

comedy. Within this general progression, however,

Jonson's comic style remained constant and easily recognisable. He announces his programme

in the prologue to the folio version of Every Man in His Humour: he promises to represent

"deeds, and language, such as men do use." He planned to write comedies that revived

the classical premises of Elizabethan dramatic theory—or rather, since all but the loosest

English comedies could claim some descent from Plautus and Terence, he intended to apply

those premises with rigour. This commitment entailed negations: after The Case is Altered,

Jonson eschewed distant locations, noble characters, romantic plots and other staples of Elizabethan

comedy, focusing instead on the satiric and realistic inheritance of new comedy. He set

his plays in contemporary settings, peopled them with recognisable types, and set them

to actions that, if not strictly realistic, involved everyday motives such as greed and

jealousy. In accordance with the temper of his age, he was often so broad in his characterisation

that many of his most famous scenes border on the farcical (as William Congreve, for

example, judged Epicoene.) He was more diligent in adhering to the classical unities than

many of his peers—although as Margaret Cavendish noted, the unity of action in the major comedies

was rather compromised by Jonson's abundance of incident. To this classical model Jonson

applied the two features of his style which save his classical imitations from mere pedantry:

the vividness with which he depicted the lives of his characters, and the intricacy of his

plots. Coleridge, for instance, claimed that The Alchemisthad one of the three most perfect

plots in literature. Poetry:

Jonson's poetry, like his drama, is informed by his classical learning. Some of his better-known

poems are close translations of Greek or Roman models; all display the careful attention

to form and style that often came naturally to those trained in classics in the humanist

manner. Jonson largely avoided the debates about rhyme and meter that had consumed Elizabethan

classicists such as Thomas Campion and Gabriel Harvey. Accepting both rhyme and stress, Jonson

used them to mimic the classical qualities of simplicity, restraint and precision.

"Epigrams" (published in the 1616 folio) is an entry in a genre that was popular among

late-Elizabethan and Jacobean audiences, although Jonson was perhaps the only poet of his time

to work in its full classical range. The epigrams explore various attitudes, most from the satiric

stock of the day: complaints against women, courtiers and spies abound. The condemnatory

poems are short and anonymous; Jonson's epigrams of praise, including a famous poem

to Camden and lines to Lucy Harington, are longer and are mostly addressed to specific

individuals. Although it is included among the epigrams, "On My First Sonne" is neither

satirical nor very short; the poem, intensely personal and deeply felt, typifies a genre

that would come to be called "lyric poetry." It is possible that the spelling of 'son'

as 'Sonne' is meant to allude to the sonnet form, with which it shares some features.

A few other so-called epigrams share this quality. Jonson's poems of "The Forest" also

appeared in the first folio. Most of the fifteen poems are addressed to Jonson's aristocratic

supporters, but the most famous are his country-house poem "To Penshurst" and the poem "To

Celia" ("Come, my Celia, let us prove") that appears also in Volpone.

Underwood, published in the expanded folio of 1640, is a larger and more heterogeneous

group of poems. It contains A Celebration of Charis, Jonson's most extended effort at

love poetry; various religious pieces; encomiastic poems including the poem to Shakespeare and

a sonnet on Mary Wroth; the Execration against Vulcan and others. The 1640 volume also contains

three elegies which have often been ascribed to Donne (one of them appeared in Donne's

posthumous collected poems). Relationship with Shakespeare:

There are many legends about Jonson's rivalry with Shakespeare, some of which may be true.

Drummond reports that during their conversation, Jonson scoffed at two apparent absurdities

in Shakespeare's plays: a nonsensical line in Julius Caesar, and the setting of The Winter's

Tale on the non-existent seacoast of Bohemia. Drummond also reported Jonson as saying that

Shakespeare "wanted art" (i.e., lacked skill). Whether Drummond is viewed as accurate or

not, the comments fit well with Jonson's well-known theories about literature.

In "De Shakespeare Nostrat" in Timber, which was published posthumously and reflects his

lifetime of practical experience, Jonson offers a fuller and more conciliatory comment. He

recalls being told by certain actors that Shakespeare never blotted (i.e., crossed out)

a line when he wrote. His own claimed response was "Would he had blotted a thousand!" However,

Jonson explains, "He was, indeed, honest and of an open and free nature, had an excellent

phantasy, brave notions and gentle expressions, wherein he flowed with that facility that

sometimes it was necessary he should be stopped". Jonson concludes that "there was ever more

in him to be praised than to be pardoned." Also when Shakespeare died, he said, "He was

not of an age, but for all time." Thomas Fuller relates stories of Jonson and

Shakespeare engaging in debates in the Mermaid Tavern; Fuller imagines conversations in which

Shakespeare would run rings around the more learned but more ponderous Jonson. That the

two men knew each other personally is beyond doubt, not only because of the tone of Jonson's

references to him but because Shakespeare's company produced a number of Jonson's plays,

at least two of which (Every Man in His Humour and Sejanus His Fall) Shakespeare certainly

acted in. However, it is now impossible to tell how much personal communication they

had, and tales of their friendship cannot be substantiated.

Jonson's most influential and revealing commentary on Shakespeare is the second of the two poems

that he contributed to the prefatory verse that opens Shakespeare's First Folio. This

poem, "To the Memory of My Beloved the Author, Mr. William Shakespeare and What He Hath Left

Us", did a good deal to create the traditional view of Shakespeare as a poet who, despite

"small Latine, and lesse Greeke", had a natural genius. The poem has traditionally been thought

to exemplify the contrast which Jonson perceived between himself, the disciplined and erudite

classicist, scornful of ignorance and sceptical of the masses, and Shakespeare, represented

in the poem as a kind of natural wonder whose genius was not subject to any rules except

those of the audiences for which he wrote. But the poem itself qualifies this view:

Yet must I not give Nature all: Thy Art, My gentle Shakespeare, must enjoy a part.

Some view this elegy as a conventional exercise, but others see it as a heartfelt tribute to

the "Sweet Swan of Avon", the "Soul of the Age!" It has been argued that Jonson helped

to edit the First Folio, and he may have been inspired to write this poem by reading his

fellow playwright's works, a number of which had been previously either unpublished or

available in less satisfactory versions, in a relatively complete form.

Reception and influence: Jonson was a towering literary figure, and

his influence was enormous for he has been described as 'One of the most vigorous minds

that ever added to the strength of English literature'. Before the English Civil War,

the "Tribe of Ben" touted his importance, and during the Restoration Jonson's satirical

comedies and his theory and practice of "humour characters" (which are often misunderstood;

see William Congreve's letters for clarification) was extremely influential, providing the blueprint

for many Restoration comedies. John Aubrey wrote of Jonson in "Brief Lives." By 1700

Jonson's status began to decline. In the Romantic era, Jonson suffered the fate of being unfairly

compared and contrasted to Shakespeare, as the taste for Jonson's type of satirical comedy

decreased. Jonson was at times greatly appreciated by the Romantics, but overall he was denigrated

for not writing in a Shakespearean vein. In 2012, after more than two decades of research,

Cambridge University Press published the first new edition of Jonson's complete works for

60 years. Drama:

As G. E. Bentley notes in Shakespeare and Jonson: Their Reputations in the Seventeenth

Century Compared, Jonson's reputation was in some respects equal to Shakespeare's in

the 17th century. After the English theatres were reopened on the Restoration of Charles

II, Jonson's work, along with Shakespeare's and Fletcher's, formed the initial core of

the Restoration repertory. It was not until after 1710 that Shakespeare's plays (ordinarily

in heavily revised forms) were more frequently performed than those of his Renaissance contemporaries.

Many critics since the 18th century have ranked Jonson below only Shakespeare among English

Renaissance dramatists. Critical judgment has tended to emphasise the very qualities

that Jonson himself lauds in his prefaces, in Timber, and in his scattered prefaces and

dedications: the realism and propriety of his language, the bite of his satire, and

the care with which he plotted his comedies. For some critics, the temptation to contrast

Jonson (representing art or craft) with Shakespeare (representing nature, or untutored genius)

has seemed natural; Jonson himself may be said to have initiated this interpretation

in the second folio, and Samuel Butler drew the same comparison in his commonplace book

later in the century. At the Restoration, this sensed difference

became a kind of critical dogma. Charles de Saint-Évremond placed Jonson's comedies above

all else in English drama, and Charles Gildon called Jonson the father of English comedy.

John Dryden offered a more common assessment in the "Essay of Dramatic Poesie," in which

his Avatar Neander compares Shakespeare to Homer and Jonson to Virgil: the former represented

profound creativity, the latter polished artifice. But "artifice" was in the 17th century almost

synonymous with "art"; Jonson, for instance, used "artificer" as a synonym for "artist"

(Discoveries, 33). For Lewis Theobald, too, Jonson "ow all his Excellence to his Art,"

in contrast to Shakespeare, the natural genius. Nicholas Rowe, to whom may be traced the legend

that Jonson owed the production of Every Man in his Humour to Shakespeare's intercession,

likewise attributed Jonson's excellence to learning, which did not raise him quite to

the level of genius. A consensus formed: Jonson was the first English poet to understand classical

precepts with any accuracy, and he was the first to apply those precepts successfully

to contemporary life. But there were also more negative spins on Jonson's learned art;

for instance, in the 1750s, Edward Young casually remarked on the way in which Jonson's learning

worked, like Samson's strength, to his own detriment. Earlier, Aphra Behn, writing in

defence of female playwrights, had pointed to Jonson as a writer whose learning did not

make him popular; unsurprisingly, she compares him unfavourably to Shakespeare. Particularly

in the tragedies, with their lengthy speeches abstracted from Sallustand Cicero, Augustan

critics saw a writer whose learning had swamped his aesthetic judgment.

In this period, Alexander Pope is exceptional in that he noted the tendency to exaggeration

in these competing critical portraits: "It is ever the nature of Parties to be in extremes;

and nothing is so probable, as that because Ben Johnson had much the most learning, it

was said on the one hand that Shakespear had none at all; and because Shakespear had much

the most wit and fancy, it was retorted on the other, that Johnson wanted both." For

the most part, the 18th century consensus remained committed to the division that Pope

doubted; as late as the 1750s, Sarah Fielding could put a brief recapitulation of this analysis

in the mouth of a "man of sense" encountered by David Simple.

Though his stature declined during the 18th century, Jonson was still read and commented

on throughout the century, generally in the kind of comparative and dismissive terms just

described. Heinrich Wilhelm von Gerstenberg translated parts of Peter Whalley's edition

into German in 1765. Shortly before the Romantic revolution, Edward Capell offered an almost

unqualified rejection of Jonson as a dramatic poet, who (he writes) "has very poor pretensions

to the high place he holds among the English Bards, as there is no original manner to distinguish

him and the tedious sameness visible in his plots indicates a defect of Genius." The disastrous

failures of productions of Volpone and Epicoene in the early 1770s no doubt bolstered a widespread

sense that Jonson had at last grown too antiquated for the contemporary public; if he still attracted

enthusiasts such as Earl Camden and William Gifford, he all but disappeared from the stage

in the last quarter of the century. The romantic revolution in criticism brought

about an overall decline in the critical estimation of Jonson. Hazlitt refers dismissively to

Jonson's "laborious caution." Coleridge, while more respectful, describes Jonson as psychologically

superficial: "He was a very accurately observing man; but he cared only to observe what was

open to, and likely to impress, the senses." Coleridge placed Jonson second only to Shakespeare;

other romantic critics were less approving. The early 19th century was the great age for

recovering Renaissance drama. Jonson, whose reputation had survived, appears to have been

less interesting to some readers than writers such as Thomas Middleton or John Heywood,

who were in some senses "discoveries" of the 19th century. Moreover, the emphasis which

the romantic writers placed on imagination, and their concomitant tendency to distrust

studied art, lowered Jonson's status, if it also sharpened their awareness of the difference

traditionally noted between Jonson and Shakespeare. This trend was by no means universal, however;

William Gifford, Jonson's first editor of the 19th century, did a great deal to defend

Jonson's reputation during this period of general decline. In the next era, Swinburne,

who was more interested in Jonson than most Victorians, wrote, "The flowers of his growing

have every quality but one which belongs to the rarest and finest among flowers: they

have colour, form, variety, fertility, vigour: the one thing they want is fragrance" – by

"fragrance," Swinburne means spontaneity. In the 20th century, Jonson's body of work

has been subject to a more varied set of analyses, broadly consistent with the interests and

programmes of modern literary criticism. In an essay printed in The Sacred Wood, T. S.

Eliot attempted to repudiate the charge that Jonson was an arid classicist by analysing

the role of imagination in his dialogue. Eliot was appreciative of Jonson's overall conception

and his "surface", a view consonant with the modernist reaction against Romantic criticism,

which tended to denigrate playwrights who did not concentrate on representations of

psychological depth. Around mid-century, a number of critics and scholars followed Eliot's

lead, producing detailed studies of Jonson's verbal style. At the same time, study of Elizabethan

themes and conventions, such as those by E. E. Stoll and M. C. Bradbrook, provided a more

vivid sense of how Jonson's work was shaped by the expectations of his time.

The proliferation of new critical perspectives after mid-century touched on Jonson inconsistently.

Jonas Barish was the leading figure among critics who appreciated Jonson's artistry.

On the other hand, Jonson received less attention from the new critics than did some other playwrights

and his work was not of programmatic interest to psychoanalytic critics. But Jonson's career

eventually made him a focal point for the revived sociopolitical criticism. Jonson's

works, particularly his masques and pageants, offer significant information regarding the

relations of literary production and political power, as do his contacts with and poems for

aristocratic patrons; moreover, his career at the centre of London's emerging literary

world has been seen as exemplifying the development of a fully commodified literary culture. In

this respect he is seen as a transitional figure, an author whose skills and ambition

led him to a leading role both in the declining culture of patronage and in the rising culture

of mass consumption. Poetry:

Jonson has been called 'the first poet laureate'. If Jonson's reputation as a playwright has

traditionally been linked to Shakespeare, his reputation as a poet has, since the early

20th century, been linked to that of John Donne. In this comparison, Jonson represents

the cavalier strain of poetry, emphasising grace and clarity of expression; Donne, by

contrast, epitomised the metaphysical school of poetry, with its reliance on strained,

baroque metaphors and often vague phrasing. Since the critics who made this comparison

(Herbert Grierson for example), were to varying extents rediscovering Donne, this comparison

often worked to the detriment of Jonson's reputation.

In his time Jonson was at least as influential as Donne. In 1623, historian Edmund Bolton

named him the best and most polished English poet. That this judgment was widely shared

is indicated by the admitted influence he had on younger poets. The grounds for describing

Jonson as the "father" of cavalier poets are clear: many of the cavalier poets described

themselves as his "sons" or his "tribe". For some of this tribe, the connection was as

much social as poetic; Herrick described meetings at "the Sun, the Dog, the Triple Tunne". All

of them, including those like Herrick whose accomplishments in verse are generally regarded

as superior to Jonson's, took inspiration from Jonson's revival of classical forms and

themes, his subtle melodies, and his disciplined use of wit. In these respects Jonson may be

regarded as among the most important figures in the prehistory of English neoclassicism.

The best of Jonson's lyrics have remained current since his time; periodically, they

experience a brief vogue, as after the publication of Peter Whalley's edition of 1756. Jonson's

poetry continues to interest scholars for the light which it sheds on English literary

history, such as politics, systems of patronage and intellectual attitudes. For the general

reader, Jonson's reputation rests on a few lyrics that, though brief, are surpassed for

grace and precision by very few Renaissance poems: "On My First Sonne"; "To Celia"; "To

Penshurst"; and the epitaph on boy player Solomon Pavy.

Jonson's works: Plays:

 A Tale of a Tub, comedy (c. 1596 revised performed 1633; printed 1640)

 The Isle of Dogs, comedy (1597, with Thomas Nashe; lost)

 The Case is Altered, comedy (c. 1597–98; printed 1609), possibly with Henry Porter

and Anthony Munday  Every Man in His Humour, comedy (performed

1598; printed 1601)  Every Man out of His Humour, comedy ( performed

1599; printed 1600)  Cynthia's Revels (performed 1600; printed

1601)  The Poetaster, comedy (performed 1601;

printed 1602)  Sejanus His Fall, tragedy (performed 1603;

printed 1605)  Eastward Ho, comedy (performed and printed

1605), a collaboration with John Marston and George Chapman

 Volpone, comedy (c. 1605–06; printed 1607)

 Epicoene, or the Silent Woman, comedy (performed 1609; printed 1616)

 The Alchemist, comedy (performed 1610; printed 1612)

 Catiline His Conspiracy, tragedy (performed and printed 1611)

 Bartholomew Fair, comedy (performed 31 October 1614; printed 1631)

 The Devil is an Ass, comedy (performed 1616; printed 1631)

 The Staple of News, comedy (performed Feb. 1626; printed 1631)

 The New Inn, or The Light Heart, comedy (licensed 19 January 1629; printed 1631)

 The Magnetic Lady, or Humors Reconciled, comedy (licensed 12 October 1632; printed

1641)  The Sad Shepherd, pastoral (c. 1637, printed

1641), unfinished  Mortimer His Fall, history (printed 1641),

a fragment Masques:

 The Coronation Triumph, or The King's Entertainment (performed 15 March 1604; printed

1604); with Thomas Dekker  A Private Entertainment of the King and

Queen on May-Day (The Penates) (1 May 1604; printed 1616)

 The Entertainment of the Queen and Prince Henry at Althorp (The Satyr) (25 June 1603;

printed 1604)  The Masque of Blackness (6 January 1605;

printed 1608)  Hymenaei (5 January 1606; printed 1606)

 The Entertainment of the Kings of Great Britain and Denmark (The Hours) (24 July 1606;

printed 1616)  The Masque of Beauty (10 January 1608;

printed 1608)  The Masque of Queens (2 February 1609;

printed 1609)  The Hue and Cry After Cupid, or The Masque

at Lord Haddington's Marriage (9 February 1608; printed c. 1608)

 The Entertainment at Britain's Burse (11 April 1609; lost, rediscovered 1997)

 The Speeches at Prince Henry's Barriers, or The Lady of the Lake (6 January 1610; printed

1616)  Oberon, the Faery Prince (1 January 1611;

printed 1616)  Love Freed from Ignorance and Folly (3

February 1611; printed 1616)  Love Restored (6 January 1612; printed

1616)  A Challenge at Tilt, at a Marriage (27

December 1613/1 January 1614; printed 1616)  The Irish Masque at Court (29 December

1613; printed 1616)  Mercury Vindicated from the Alchemists

(6 January 1615; printed 1616)  The Golden Age Restored (1 January 1616;

printed 1616)  Christmas, His Masque (Christmas 1616;

printed 1641)  The Vision of Delight (6 January 1617;

printed 1641)  Lovers Made Men, or The Masque of Lethe,

or The Masque at Lord Hay's (22 February 1617; printed 1617)

 Pleasure Reconciled to Virtue (6 January 1618; printed 1641) The masque was a failure;

Jonson revised it by placing the anti-masque first, turning it into:

 For the Honour of Wales (17 February 1618; printed 1641)

 News from the New World Discovered in the Moon (7 January 1620: printed 1641)

 The Entertainment at Blackfriars, or The Newcastle Entertainment (May 1620?; MS)

 Pan's Anniversary, or The Shepherd's Holy-Day (19 June 1620?; printed 1641)

 The Gypsies Metamorphosed (3 and 5 August 1621; printed 1640)

 The Masque of Augurs (6 January 1622; printed 1622)

 Time Vindicated to Himself and to His Honours (19 January 1623; printed 1623)

 Neptune's Triumph for the Return of Albion (26 January 1624; printed 1624)

 The Masque of Owls at Kenilworth (19 August 1624; printed 1641)

 The Fortunate Isles and Their Union (9 January 1625; printed 1625)

 Love's Triumph Through Callipolis (9 January 1631; printed 1631)

 Chloridia: Rites to Chloris and Her Nymphs (22 February 1631; printed 1631)

 The King's Entertainment at Welbeck in Nottinghamshire (21 May 1633; printed 1641)

 Love's Welcome at Bolsover ( 30 July 1634; printed 1641)

Other works:  Epigrams (1612)

 The Forest (1616), including To Penshurst  On My First Sonne (1616), elegy

 A Discourse of Love (1618)  Barclay's Argenis, translated by Jonson

(1623)  The Execration against Vulcan (1640)

 Horace's Art of Poetry, translated by Jonson (1640), with a commendatory verse by

Edward Herbert  Underwood (1640)

 English Grammar (1640)  Timber, or Discoveries made upon men and

matter, as they have flowed out of his daily readings, or had their reflux to his peculiar

notion of the times, a commonplace book  To Celia (Drink to Me Only With Thine

Eyes), poem It is in Jonson's Timber, or Discoveries...

that he famously quipped on the manner in which language became a measure of the speaker

or writer: Language most shows a man: Speak, that I may

see thee. It springs out of the most retired and inmost parts of us, and is the image of

the parent of it, the mind. No glass renders a man's form or likeness so true as his

speech. Nay, it is likened to a man; and as we consider feature and composition in a man,

so words in language; in the greatness, aptness, sound structure, and harmony of it.

— Ben Jonson, 1640 (posthumous) As with other English Renaissance dramatists,

a portion of Ben Jonson's literary output has not survived. In addition to The Isle

of Dogs (1597), the records suggest these lost plays as wholly or partially Jonson's

work: Richard Crookback (1602); Hot Anger Soon Cold (1598), with Porter and Henry Chettle;

Page of Plymouth (1599), with Dekker; and Robert II, King of Scots (1599), with Chettle

and Dekker. Several of Jonson's masques and entertainments also are not extant: The Entertainment

at Merchant Taylors (1607); The Entertainment at Salisbury House for James I (1608); and

The May Lord (1613–19). Finally, there are questionable or borderline

attributions. Jonson may have had a hand in Rollo, Duke of Normandy, or The Bloody Brother,

a play in the canon of John Fletcher and his collaborators. The comedy The Widow was printed

in 1652 as the work of Thomas Middleton, Fletcher and Jonson, though scholars have been intensely

sceptical about Jonson's presence in the play. A few attributions of anonymous plays, such

as The London Prodigal, have been ventured by individual researchers, but have met with

cool responses. Biographies of Ben Jonson:

 Ben Jonson: His Life and Work by Rosalind Miles

 Ben Jonson: His Craft and Art by Rosalind Miles

 Ben Jonson: A Literary Life by W. David Kay

 Ben Jonson: A Life by David Riggs (1989)  Ben Jonson: A Life by Ian Donaldson (2011)

Thanks for watching. Please, subscribe to my channel.

For more infomation >> What was Benjamin Jonson | Benjamin Jonson's Life & Works - Duration: 55:59.

-------------------------------------------

Tip of the Day - What is Ransomware? - Duration: 3:18.

Good Morning! Happy Monday and welcome to ArchIT Tech Tip of the Day, with your host

Boris Rapoport Today I want to talk about

something serious. We're going to talk about ransomware and specifically I want

to define what Ransomware is, what makes it so bad, and what some of the

real-world impact could be for a design and build firm. First of all, what is

ransomware? Ransomware is a computer virus that takes your files, your data

and your network hostage, until you pay a ransom. In many cases paying a ransom

gets you access to your files back, but a lot of times it doesn't and those

files don't always come back intact as they were before. So that creates some

additional problems for the business. Not only do they pay the ransom, they also

have to now pay to figure out how to get their files back. What makes

ransomware so bad? Mostly is the speed with which it can

spread through your network and infect all of your files. If

one one computer gets infected, within minutes all the computers can get

infected, and the file servers get infected as well. All your files and

your data in your business get encrypted and your business becomes paralyzed from

a technology point of view. That creates a terrible situation and

downtime. How terrible is the downtime for your business?

Here's a real-world example. About two weeks ago we were called in on a case

where an architecture firm here in the Bay Area got hit with ransomware. It's a

22 person firm, I believe, but we'll just call it 20 for the ease of math.

Their internal IT guy couldn't get them back up and running for about two days,

and then they called us. It took us another two days to

actually get most of their files recovered. All together they were down

for four days. That's a lot, if you do the math. If we just take 20

people at $100 an hour and we just say they were only 50% billable.

It's about $32,000 that they've lost. Not to mention some of the deadlines that

they could not meet, and bad reputation that it could cause with

their clients and their partners. If

you follow this example you can see how bad ransomeware can really be for your business.

My goal with this video was to provide some of that education for you guys.

Then in the following videos this week we're going to talk

about how we can prevent this from happening. Please stay tuned. Follow

our ArchIT company page on LinkedIn or Facebook and I'll talk to you tomorrow!

Thank you

For more infomation >> Tip of the Day - What is Ransomware? - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

NFL Star Posts Daughter's Prom Pic, Liberals Freak When They See What He's Holding - Duration: 5:15.

For more infomation >> NFL Star Posts Daughter's Prom Pic, Liberals Freak When They See What He's Holding - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

What Is ArTTrek? - Duration: 1:31.

>> Allison Hirth, Reporting: READ READER, FOUR FACES AND PRIMORDIAL GARDEN. THEY ALL LOOK VERY DIFFERENT BUT

THERE'S ONE THING IN COMMON. THEY'RE PART OF THE TEXAS TECH

UNIVERSITY SYSTEM'S PUBLIC ART PROGRAM. (IT'S) ONE OF THE TOP UNIVERSITY PUBLIC ART

COLLECTIONS IN THE COUNTRY. AND NOW YOU CAN ENJOY IT IN A WHOLE NEW WAY. THIS IS

ARTTREK AND IT'S AN APP, ONE THAT'S FREE TO DOWNLOAD TO YOUR DEVICE. THINK OF IT

AS INSTANT ACCESS TO PUBLIC ART. >> Emily Wilkinson, Director: Once you get inside the app, it will pinpoint your

location. This app will tell you, okay, I'm standing by the SUB, here are all these

dots around me now that are showing me what the public art are. >> Allison Hirth: BESIDES TELLING

YOU WHICH PIECES ARE NEARBY, THERE ARE ALSO THEMED TOURS. >> Emily Wilkinson: So, you can

say, 'Well, I want to see all the pieces with lights on them-- that light up at

night,' so you can do a night trek. You can also create your own maps within-- do

favorite pieces, come up with your own themes and do it that way. >> Allison Hirth: YOU CAN POST

PICTURES STRAIGHT TO SOCIAL MEDIA. THERE'S EVEN AN INTERACTIVE GAME. PLUS, A

WAY TO LEARN ABOUT THE CREATOR'S WHO MAKE UP THE COLLECTION. >> Emily Wilkinson: We do have

information about the art-- pictures-- but it'll also have videos of the artists

themselves talking about the pieces. >> Allison Hirth: ARTTREK WAS MADE POSSIBLE THANKS TO A

GENEROUS GRANT FROM THE C.H. FOUNDATION. FOR TEXAS TECH TODAY, I'M ALLISON HIRTH.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét