Auto news on Youtube Apr 22 2018

Brand New 2018 California Tiny House on Wheels for Sale

For more infomation >> Brand New 2018 California Tiny House on Wheels for Sale - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

California murder suspect arrested after standoff in Pflugerville - Duration: 1:35.

For more infomation >> California murder suspect arrested after standoff in Pflugerville - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

California stabbing suspect arrested in Pflugerville - Duration: 1:29.

For more infomation >> California stabbing suspect arrested in Pflugerville - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

Get A Job Now: Northern California Fires Ignite Hiring Spree - Duration: 2:38.

For more infomation >> Get A Job Now: Northern California Fires Ignite Hiring Spree - Duration: 2:38.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:26.

BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know.

Scientists are now saying that the "Big One" in California may not be caused by

the San Andreas fault line, but by the Hayward Bay fault line.

It is now thought to be the "ticking time bomb" fault line and more dangerous than

the San Andreas.

The scariest scenario for the next major earthquake may not be from the San Andreas Fault (though

that one still threatens), but from the Hayward Fault that runs along the east side of the

San Francisco Bay.

In fact, many say that the next earthquake on the Hayward Bay fault line would be "disastrous."

According to KTUV, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake along the Hayward Fault could kill as many

as 800 people and injure 18,000, according to results of a new research released Wednesday.

The U.S. Geological Survey, citing findings from a simulated tremor with an epicenter

in Oakland, said the disaster would cause 400 fires that could destroy 50,000 homes.

Nearly half a million people would be displaced, authorities said.

USGS: This shows the scenario of a 6.8 earthquake on the Hayward Fault

The simulated quake in the video above, known as the "HayWired scenario," was modeled

to occur at 4:18 p.m. on April 18.

It replicates a rupture along the fault's entire 52-mile length, from San Pablo Bay

in the north to just east of San Jose in the south.

According to this model, the violent shaking from the earthquake could cause the two sides

of the fault to split six feet apart in some places.

Some of the aftershocks would continue for several months as well.

Cities in the East Bay would be hit hard, including Berkeley, Oakland, San Leandro,

and Hayward.

If a 7.0 magnitude quake occurred like the one simulated, researchers say that the East

Bay residents could be without water from anywhere between six weeks to six months.

Electricity could be out for up to four weeks in some locations.

According to Business Insider, the statistical chances of this type of an earthquake occurring

are not very comforting either.

There's about a 76% chance that the San Francisco Bay Area could experience a 7.2

magnitude earthquake within the next 30 years, according to some recent reports.

The San Andreas Fault under San Francisco rumbled apart about 112 years ago, causing

the devastating 1906 earthquake that swallowed city blocks, broke water mains, and triggered

massive fires that burned for days.

However, the threat of another major quake for the Bay Area is "real and could happen

at any time," according to researchers for the US Geological Survey.

The Hayward Fault is a "tectonic time bomb, due any time for another magnitude 6.8 to

7.0 earthquake," according to a 2008 USGS report.

Since then, research has indicated that the likelihood of a Hayward quake is greater and

more threatening to the 7 million Bay Area residents than a San Andreas quake would be.

"It's just waiting to go off," USGS earthquake geologist emeritus David Schwartz

warned when speaking to the Los Angeles Times.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today

For more infomation >> BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

Rustic Stuff Home Fantasies for a Couple in California - Duration: 2:04.

Rustic Stuff Home Fantasies for a Couple in California

For more infomation >> Rustic Stuff Home Fantasies for a Couple in California - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:38.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:38.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:39.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's Charade After They Refused Orders - Duration: 5:44.

FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's Charade After They Refused Orders.

After decades of giving Democrats free reign of California, it's starting to seem like

the American residents have finally had enough of the unmitigated disaster, said politicians

have turned the once Golden State into.

While the whole state is falling apart with it's out of control homelessness, gas prices

that more than double the national average, and streets that look like something out of

a third world ghetto in major cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Sacramento

the governor of the state, Jerry Brown, chooses to battle President Trump's attempt at securing

our borders instead of fixing, what California citizens have to deal with on a daily basis.

Last month President Trump asked the governors of border states to help address the severe

illegal immigration issue, and send in the national guard to protect against a yearly

caravan of illegals making, the trek from Latin America into the U.S.

To which Brown instead of complying to make our nation a safer place, wanted to make sure

the troops wouldn't be there to stop illegals from coming, but to instead just make sure

that when they come in they have a safe experience.

But the good news is according to an article on American News Daily, all these shenanigans

from the Democrats in California are finally starting to take its toll on the state's

citizens.

It looks as though after constantly trying the same thing over, and over again they have

finally started to wake up and realize things don't need to be this way.

In fact, a Republican running for Governor might actually have a prayer of winning this

year, or at least coming close to it, which is a huge victory in the eyes of any person

on the right stuck trying to live in the liberal mecca of California.

Here is what Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich had to say about the California Governer's

race via SF Gate:

"Former Speaker of the House and 2012 presidential candidate Newt Gingrich thinks, that California

could elect a Republican governor in 2018.

In a Fox News op-ed titled "California may elect a Republican governor Incredible as

that sounds," Gingrich writes that GOP candidate John Cox is "within striking distance"

of front runner Gavin Newsom.

Gingrich cites a recent Public Policy Institute of California poll that found, that Cox has

surged into second place behind Newsom, and notes that a quarter of the poll's participants

were undecided.

Cox trails Newsom 28 percent to 14 percent, but a second-place finish in the June 5 primary

would guarantee that Cox moves, on to face Newsom in a one-on-one race in November.

California's primary system is unconventional, with every candidate regardless of party affiliation

appearing on the same ballot in June.

The top two finishers then move on to the general election in November, meaning that

it is possible for two Democrats to run against each other.

Gingrich calls California's primary process a "great system for silencing and drowning

out political minorities," and states that "it has likely been a big help to California

Democrats since it was adopted in 2010."

(No Republican has won statewide office in California since 2006).

The three Republican candidates for governor: State Assemblyman Travis Allen, businessman

John Cox and former Congressman Doug Ose.

The former house speaker likes Cox's odds against Newsom in a one-on-one race, since

he believes that California would "clearly" benefit from Cox's conservative leadership.

"Cox would work to cut state taxes so that Californians would see more take-home pay,

and small businesses would be more able to grow, succeed, expand and create more jobs,"

Gingrich writes.

"This includes the hugely unpopular gasoline tax that the Democratic California Legislature,

and Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown imposed on drivers last year."

Gingrich believes that Cox can win on the issue of immigration, writing, "Democratic

leadership has also made California a haven for criminals who are in the country illegally.

Cox has pledged to end California's lawless sanctuary policies, and work with federal

officials to get those who are in the country illegally and committing crimes off the streets

and out of the country."

Gingrich doesn't use any poll numbers or raw data to support these claims, but an LA

Times USC Dornsife poll from 2017 did find that a majority of Californians want to see

the gas tax repealed.

On the issue of immigration however, the same poll found that a majority of Californians

support California's sanctuary state law.

Gingrich also notes how important it is for the national GOP to have a Republican candidate

for governor on the ballot in November.

He cites a SmithJohnson Research survey that found that 99.6 percent of Californians said

they planned to vote in the June primary, but only 56.1 percent of these voters would

vote in November if there were two Democrats on ballot for governor.

Low turnout could doom GOP candidates in tightly-contested local races.

Gingrich writes, "Republicans currently hold only 14 of California's 53 House seats,

all of which will be on the ballot this November.

Any losses or gains in California could have a serious impact, on the ability of Republicans

to keep control of the House."

In other words, Cox's performance in June could help determine who controls the House

of Representatives in 2019."

We'll see how this plays out during the summer and the months leading up to the election,

but for the meantime, at least there is some hope in a state that just two short years

ago was considered an instant loss for Republicans.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> FREE RIDES OVER! Trump NOT Funding California's Charade After They Refused Orders - Duration: 5:44.

-------------------------------------------

California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity - Duration: 4:02.

California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity.

A pro-LGBTQ bill in California could lead to the elimination of free speech, and it

could even ban one of the oldest books in the world, the Bible.

The law would target Christians in a way that only communist regimes have in the past.

In what should be a surprise to no one, it has the support of many Democrats in the Golden

State.

California Assembly Bill 2943 says that "contemporary science recognizes that being lesbian, gay,

bisexual, or transgender is part of the natural spectrum of human identity and is not a disease,

disorder, or illness."

And, if passed, the bill would make it "an unlawful practice prohibited under the Consumer

Legal Remedies Act, advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation

change efforts with an individual."

That means that it is conceivable that a priest, or a Muslim Imam, would be committing a crime

if they taught what their respective religions teach about homosexuality.

It would literally be a crime for them to do their job and preach their religion.

The law cites a report from the American Psychiatric Association published in 2000 that "advises

parents, guardians, young people, and their families to avoid sexual orientation change

efforts that portray homosexuality as a mental illness, or developmental disorder and to

seek psychotherapy, social support, and educational services that provide accurate information

on sexual orientation and sexuality, increase family and school support, and reduce rejection

of sexual minority youth."

In other words, if you have a kid who is a male and that kid puts on a dress and declares

that he is a woman, you are supposed to treat that as normal.

What if your child climbs to the top of the house, stands on the roof, and declares that

he is an airplane?

Are you supposed to allow him to jump because daring to think, that he could possibly have

a mental issue if he believes that he is something he isn't is verboten?

The bill is even more draconian than it seems on the surface, and on the surface, it seems

pretty draconian.

The bill bans "the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer" of any book

or publication that has "advertising, offering to engage in, or engaging in sexual orientation

change efforts with an individual."

That means if a church or mosque were to sell a book that tells you to fight homosexual

urges, that book could be banned.

If the religious institution did sell the book, it could be committing a crime.

It bans any publication that says that homosexuality is a sin, and that could lead to a banning

of the Bible.

Randy Thomasson of SaveCalifornia.com wrote that the law could overreach into areas of

banning free speech, that people like Joseph Stalin championed.

It could become so pervasive that it bans the practice of religion in the state.

"So, this is a pastor speaking, you pay a ticket to hear him speak.

He speaks about overcoming same-sex desires.

Hey, that could be outlawed.

A church sells a book about overcoming same-sex desires.

There's a sale, there's a transaction, that could be banned," Thomasson told CBN

News.

"This is very expansive, very tyrannical and absolutely squashing free speech, religious

freedom and basic choice of people.

This is an anti-freedom, anti-American bill," he said.

The bill says it is needed because "California has a compelling interest in protecting the

physical and psychological well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals."

But what about the freedom of religion of Californians that is enshrined in the Constitution

of the United States?

Is it not enough for Commiefornia that it has infringed on the right to bear arms of

its state residents?

Does it need to infringe on its citizens First Amendment rights too?

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> California Governor Jerry Brown's New Bill Could Ban Christianity - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

California Gov. Jerry Brown To Ban Sales Of The Bible - Duration: 2:56.

For more infomation >> California Gov. Jerry Brown To Ban Sales Of The Bible - Duration: 2:56.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know - Duration: 3:43.

BREAKING: California On HIGH ALERT- Authorities Release Statement- Here's What We Know

Scientists are now saying that the "Big One" in California may not be caused by

the San Andreas fault line, but by the Hayward Bay fault line.

It is now thought to be the "ticking time bomb" fault line and more dangerous than

the San Andreas.

The scariest scenario for the next major earthquake may not be from the San Andreas Fault (though

that one still threatens), but from the Hayward Fault that runs along the east side of the

San Francisco Bay.

In fact, many say that the next earthquake on the Hayward Bay fault line would be "disastrous."

According to KTUV, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake along the Hayward Fault could kill as many

as 800 people and injure 18,000, according to results of a new research released Wednesday.

The U.S. Geological Survey, citing findings from a simulated tremor with an epicenter

in Oakland, said the disaster would cause 400 fires that could destroy 50,000 homes.

Nearly half a million people would be displaced, authorities said.The simulated quake in the

video above, known as the "HayWired scenario," was modeled to occur at 4:18 p.m. on April

18.

It replicates a rupture along the fault's entire 52-mile length, from San Pablo Bay

in the north to just east of San Jose in the south.

According to this model, the violent shaking from the earthquake could cause the two sides

of the fault to split six feet apart in some places.

Some of the aftershocks would continue for several months as well.

Cities in the East Bay would be hit hard, including Berkeley, Oakland, San Leandro,

and Hayward.

If a 7.0 magnitude quake occurred like the one simulated, researchers say that the East

Bay residents could be without water from anywhere between six weeks to six months.

Electricity could be out for up to four weeks in some locations.

According to Business Insider, the statistical chances of this type of an earthquake occurring

are not very comforting either.

There's about a 76% chance that the San Francisco Bay Area could experience a 7.2

magnitude earthquake within the next 30 years, according to some recent reports.

The San Andreas Fault under San Francisco rumbled apart about 112 years ago, causing

the devastating 1906 earthquake that swallowed city blocks, broke water mains, and triggered

massive fires that burned for days.

However, the threat of another major quake for the Bay Area is "real and could happen

at any time," according to researchers for the US Geological Survey.

The Hayward Fault is a "tectonic time bomb, due any time for another magnitude 6.8 to

7.0 earthquake," according to a 2008 USGS report.

Since then, research has indicated that the likelihood of a Hayward quake is greater and

more threatening to the 7 million Bay Area residents than a San Andreas quake would be.

"It's just waiting to go off," USGS earthquake geologist emeritus David Schwartz

warned when speaking to the Los Angeles Times.