Thứ Tư, 5 tháng 9, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Sep 5 2018

over the last several years we have really focused our efforts on readiness

for any contingency needed I'm really proud to be a part of the US Army

Pacific team it's the Army's largest service component command

it's a vast area of the Pacific. 16 time zones with 36 countries and 24 of

36 mega cities in the world are growing in the Pacific it's also interesting

seven of the ten largest armies in the world are in the Pacific

it is a vast region there is the we call it the tyranny of distance and it hasn't

changed that much when you look sometimes you think modern technology

can shrink that tyranny of distance but actually if you look at a ship in World

War II it maybe took 28 to 30 days to sail from the west coast. It takes 26 to 28

today so a couple days earlier still a long ways to go we know now aircraft can

get places quicker but we don't have as many of them so there are challenges so

it's a it's a vast region the other interesting fact in the Pacific we have

seven alliances in the world as a nation United States five of the seven are in

the Pacific. Alliance with Korea, Japan, Philippines,

Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, those alliances are key five of the

seven in the Pacific and obviously you're going to do the most with your

alliance partners and if for example if you look in my 30-plus years dealing

with the forces in Korea I've never seen us closer it's just an ironclad relationship

in the past we've had the luxury of maybe six eight months to

build up forces it's not gonna be that way in the future and they have to be

ready to fight tonight what we have and ready to go I feel very confident right

now as I said, pray for peace I hope we don't have but if we're needed I could

look those parents in the eye and we have really focused readiness that folks

are trained and ready for whatever contingency is required.

on the peninsula we've shifted over the years and that probably about the six years ago the

U.S. was totally in the lead on the peninsula and ROK Army forces would

follow and ROK military well it shifted the ROKs are in the lead and they have

a tremendous army, tremendous military that combined effort is a huge advantage

you know we're better together but when you have folks are working together

daily and then a crisis occurs guess what it's they know what to do you don't

have to form a relationship in the crisis it's too late so but well before

the crisis you're working together in a daily basis as a combined division

that's going to lead to victory should somebody be stupid enough to

challenge us.

For more infomation >> State of the Pacific - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

'Crazy Rich Asians' Becomes Most Successful U.S. Studio Rom-Com in 9 Years | THR News - Duration: 1:47.

'Crazy Rich Asians' has become the most successful Hollywood studio romantic comedy

in nearly a decade at the North American box office. The Jon M. Chu directed flick

finished the Labor Day long weekend with an estimated total of $117 million, beating out

the $110.2 million earned domestically by Amy Schumer's 2015 pic 'Trainwreck.'

Since its debut in mid-August, 'Crazy Rich Asians' has continued to defy the overall

comedy slump gripping the U.S. box office for the past several years and boasts the top

showing for a rom-com since Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds' 'The Proposal'

earned $164 million in North America in 2009, not adjusted for inflation.

The $30 million movie, along with the shark pic 'The Meg' and the Tom Cruise blockbuster

'Mission: Impossible — Fallout,' also helped to give the box-office a better than expected

August, with the month being up nearly 30 percent over the same time frame in 2017.

Also over the Labor Day frame, 'Crazy Rich Asians' eclipsed the 2017 summer box office

hit 'Girls Trip' domestically to become the most successful live-action comedy in

at least two years, regardless of genre. 'Girls Trip' earned $140 million globally

while 'Crazy Rich Asians,' which is still early in its foreign run, has already grossed

$136.9 million to date at the worldwide box office.

The critically acclaimed movie - which is the first Hollywood studio film to feature an

all-Westernized Asian-American cast since 1993's 'The Joy Luck Club' - is appealing

to an ethnically diverse audience and has enjoyed a stellar hold and topped the chart

for three consecutive weekends. Warner Bros. Pictures is already looking ahead to a

sequel to the groundbreaking rom-com which stars Constance Wu,

Henry Golding, MIchelle Yeh and Awkwafina.

To read more on this story, head to THR.com.

For The Hollywood Reporter News, I'm Lyndsey Rodrigues.

For more infomation >> 'Crazy Rich Asians' Becomes Most Successful U.S. Studio Rom-Com in 9 Years | THR News - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

Deadly crime spree in two states ends in two deaths - Duration: 1:39.

For more infomation >> Deadly crime spree in two states ends in two deaths - Duration: 1:39.

-------------------------------------------

Former Arizona US Sen. Jon Kyl Picked To Replace John McCain - Duration: 0:24.

For more infomation >> Former Arizona US Sen. Jon Kyl Picked To Replace John McCain - Duration: 0:24.

-------------------------------------------

Possible Hurricane To Come Onshore Around Alabama, Mississippi State Lines - Duration: 2:50.

For more infomation >> Possible Hurricane To Come Onshore Around Alabama, Mississippi State Lines - Duration: 2:50.

-------------------------------------------

States Sign Langauge - Duration: 5:33.

Hello Everyone!

Welcome to my channel!

Are you ready to learning sign about states?

It is easy but it is bit different because of spell or short.

Ready?

I am done with teaching.

It is seem not bad but it is 50 states

I think it will practice more and use it then rememble it.

Thank you for watching!

Don't forget to Subscribe and like this video!

See you in next video!

For more infomation >> States Sign Langauge - Duration: 5:33.

-------------------------------------------

Mauritius wants Chagos Islands, hosting US air base, back from UK - Duration: 3:34.

Mauritius wants Chagos Islands, hosting US air base, back from UK

Mauritius wants Chagos Islands, hosting US air base, back from UK.

  The legality of Britain's claim to the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean, which house a major US military base, will be considered by the International Court of Justice on Monday when it starts a week of hearings.

Britain has overseen the islands since 1814 and in 1965 detached the Chagos Islands from Mauritius, then a British colony, which became independent three years later.

Britain went on to lease the Chagos Islands' biggest island, Diego Garcia, to the United States in 1966, paving the way for construction of an air base that required the forced removal of around 1,500 people.

Mauritius has said it was unfairly pressured to cede control of the islands during the negotiations, and had agreed only to their temporary use for military purposes.

  Mauritius petitioned the United Nations for an International Court of Justice opinion on the legality of Britain's possession of the islands just south of the Maldives.

Britain and the United States opposed the demand, but were voted down by the UN general assembly.

Britain is expected to argue that Mauritius is trying to improperly use the International Court of Justice or "World Court" to settle a bilateral dispute.

More than 20 interested parties, including the United States and the African Union, have asked to take part in the hearings.

"These things come together now in a combination of historical accident and intense political and popular interest in questions of colonial legacy," international law expert Geoff Gordon of the Asser Institute in The Hague said.

A combination of historical accident and intense political and popular interest in questions of colonial legacy International law expert Geoff Gordon The World Court will ultimately issue only an "advisory opinion" on the case, but opinions by the United Nations' highest court can carry significant weight in international law.

The people displaced from the Chagos Island have already lobbied to be able to return.

But in 2016, Britain's foreign ministry extended Diego Garcia's lease until 2036 and declared the expelled islanders would not be allowed to return.

The people from Chagos were originally moved to nearby Mauritius and the Seychelles and effectively barred from returning.

Many eventually settled in southern England.

For more infomation >> Mauritius wants Chagos Islands, hosting US air base, back from UK - Duration: 3:34.

-------------------------------------------

FLETC Talks - Katz v. US - Duration: 5:48.

♪ Music Playing ♪

In February 1965 Charles Katz left his apartment,

walked to a pay telephone booth on the famous

Sunset Strip in Los Angeles, California,

and radically changed the way we understand the

Fourth Amendment.

Katz was a basketball handicapper and by all

accounts a very good one.

On that fateful day in February,

he entered the telephone booth,

closed the door behind him, dropped a coin in the slot

and called Miami and Boston to place bets on

college basketball.

By uttering phrases like "Duquesne minus seven for a

nickel!" Katz committed a federal crime.

Unfortunately for Mr. Katz, the FBI was on to him,

and they had placed a microphones on top of that

phone booth to record his side of the conversation.

That recording, "Duquesne minus seven for a nickel!"

and others were played at his trial,

and he was convicted.

Katz had sought unsuccessfully to suppress

this evidence at trial, because the FBI agents did

not obtain a search warrant before they

recorded his conversations.

Katz appealed his case all the way to the United States

Supreme Court.

He asked the Court to suppress the evidence of his

illegal gambling, claiming the government violated his

Fourth Amendment rights when the agents attached the

electronic listening and recording devices to the top

of that telephone booth.

The language of the Fourth Amendment did not seem to be

helpful to Katz.

The Fourth Amendment states that people have a right to

be secure in their persons, houses,

papers and effects.

The telephone booth was none of these things.

Further, the government never physically searched

Katz or his property and they did not seize anything,

they merely recorded and listened to him

betting on games.

But in a 7 to 1 decision, the Supreme Court suppressed

the recordings and expanded the scope of the Fourth Amendment.

The Supreme Court explained that the Fourth Amendment's

focus is not on places, but on people.

The Court found that the Fourth Amendment relates to

privacy and that it can apply to protecting both tangible

things like property and non-tangible things like the

recording of conversations.

The main issue for the court,

was whether the government intruded into something tht

a person intended to keep private.

Justice Harlan, in a now famous concurring opinion,

explained the twofold test to determine when the Fourth

Amendment affords protection.

First, has the person exhibited an actual or

subjective expectation of privacy?

Second, is that expectation one that society is prepared

to recognize as reasonable?

If both questions are answered "yes" then the

government intrusion is a search under the Fourth Amendment.

Although the word privacy is not written into the Fourth

Amendment, or mentioned anywhere else in the

Constitution, the Supreme Court emphasized that the

Fourth Amendment is connected to a reasonable

expectation of privacy.

For Katz, this was a winning bet.

The Court found, that when he "occupied the telephone

booth and shuts the door behind him,

and pays the toll that permits him to place a

call," he was "entitled to assume his conversation was

not being intercepted." It did not matter that the

phone booth had windows or that people on the street

could see him.

Since he closed the door of the booth,

he expected privacy in what he was saying,

and the court found that that expectation of privacy

was reasonable.

Since Katz had a reasonable expectation of privacy in

his telephone conversation, the government needed to get

a search warrant, or have an exception to the warrant

requirement, in order to listen and record the phone call.

Since 1967, a law enforcement officer conducts

a search anytime they intrude upon an area where a

person has a "reasonable expectation of privacy."

This test, R.E.P, has allowed Courts to determine

that Fourth Amendment protections extend to many

areas that once had no protection at all,

including wiretaps, video only surveillance and

recently the long term tracking of our physical movements.

Shortly after Katz, Congress passed a statute,

that we now refer to as Title III,

to make it even more difficult to obtain court

permission to wiretap phone conversations.

But the two part test for a Katz search lives on.

Today, The Fourth Amendment clearly protects areas where

a person has a subjective expectation of privacy when

that expectation of privacy is reasonable.

Every officer in America knows that R.E.P.

stands for a reasonable expectation of privacy.

And all of this happened because a gambler in Los

Angeles decided to place a bet.

Now what are the odds of that?

I'm Patrick Walsh, and this has been a FLETC Talk.

♪ Music Playing ♪

For more infomation >> FLETC Talks - Katz v. US - Duration: 5:48.

-------------------------------------------

Trump can pull US out of NAFTA without Congress: Rep. Reed - Duration: 3:07.

For more infomation >> Trump can pull US out of NAFTA without Congress: Rep. Reed - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Big Dem Arrested At U.S. Capital Thought She Was Above Law, Learns Brutal Lesson Too Late - Duration: 2:19.

For more infomation >> Big Dem Arrested At U.S. Capital Thought She Was Above Law, Learns Brutal Lesson Too Late - Duration: 2:19.

-------------------------------------------

US and Japanese warships are drilling in the South China Sea in a show of force in China's backyard - Duration: 3:03.

For more infomation >> US and Japanese warships are drilling in the South China Sea in a show of force in China's backyard - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

China's been conducting economic warfare on US for years: Gen. Keane - Duration: 3:20.

For more infomation >> China's been conducting economic warfare on US for years: Gen. Keane - Duration: 3:20.

-------------------------------------------

Infuriating Cost to Fly McCain's Body Across US For Week of Funerals Leaked – Will Make You Sick! - Duration: 3:39.

For more infomation >> Infuriating Cost to Fly McCain's Body Across US For Week of Funerals Leaked – Will Make You Sick! - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

Strong desire for China, US to come to an agreement: Rep. Davidson - Duration: 2:33.

For more infomation >> Strong desire for China, US to come to an agreement: Rep. Davidson - Duration: 2:33.

-------------------------------------------

Virginia Tech opens season with 24-3 win over Florida State - Duration: 2:04.

For more infomation >> Virginia Tech opens season with 24-3 win over Florida State - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Supreme Court Hearing Could Affect WV Politics - Duration: 2:12.

For more infomation >> U.S. Supreme Court Hearing Could Affect WV Politics - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

Ken Marcus, Asst. Sec. for Civil Rights, U.S. Dept. of Education - RespectAbility Summit 2018 - Duration: 13:49.

Our next speaker from the administration is somebody who I've literally known for decades

as a champion of civil rights.

He served in a previous administration, where he also served on civil rights issues.

Our special guest for lunch is Kenneth L. Marcus, and he is the Assistant Secretary

for civil rights at the U.S. Department of Education.

He has an extensive background in civil rights law.

He most recently served as president and general council of the Lewis D. Brandeis Center for

human rights under law.

He was previously staff Director of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and before that

he was delegated the authority of Assistant Secretary of Education for civil rights under

President George W. Bush.

He also previously served as the Lillie and Nathan Ackerman Chair in Equality and Justice

in America at the City University of New York School of Public Affairs.

Mr. Marcus is a graduate from the University of California at Berkeley of Law and Williams

College.

I'm really delighted—before he comes out—I just want to acknowledge that the disability

community has not had as smooth a relationship in some cases with his department, and that

he has inherited a bit of a rift that he is working on, and that we have an open good

relationship with him and know him to be a person of tremendous integrity and work and

that we are deeply appreciative of the fact that he is here.

He is new in his new job as a political appointee of the Trump Administration serving at the

pleasure of the President and I am delighted and honored that he has joined us today.

Kenneth Marcus.

Thank you, thank you all.

As Jennifer says, we have known each other for decades.

It is such a pleasure to be here.

I've had so much respect for you over the years for leadership on so many issues.

And have been so impressed with what you built here with RespectAbility and the work that

you are doing.

It was also an honor to be here with representative Brad Sherman, I think he may have left, so

we can now say whatever we want to about him.

But what I'll say is having known him for some years and worked with him on different

issues, I found him to be an exceptionally energetic, well-informed advocate.

Sp I think it is a privilege to have heard from him.

I see other friends here, Bill, Heidi, lots of folks.

Good to see you all.

My colleague, Ollie Cantos, is here. Some of you may know him

I guess he's on the board of advisers of this

organization.

This, like many of you—this is what he does on his days off.

But these are the sort of issues he deals with on his days on as well.

So, it's a pleasure to be working with him and to be with him today.

I understand you heard from my colleague Johnny Collett just a little while ago.

So, I'll have only a few remarks.

You may recall that he administers the IDEA for our department, Department of Education.

What I do in overseeing the Office for Civil Rights to enforce civil rights laws involving

issues of disability as well as race, color, national origin, sex, et cetera.

So, we are in the law enforcement area.

Over time I have been, I guess, honored to learn from this organization and from Jennifer.

One of the issues that, speaking personally, that I have been concerned about are some

of the numbers that we see involving the graduation, graduation as well as employment rates, for

people with disabilities.

We've seen in recent years for Americans, high school graduation rates vicinity lately

in 80, 81, 82% rate.

But when we're looking at students with disabilities, it's about 20 points lower

as Jennifer just indicated. And that delta

That 20 points is an area of concern. Especially when

we know there are others who are disabled, who are also either English language learners

or who may be racial or ethnic minorities, and who may therefore be subject to multiple

forms of disability.

Now I was discussing this issue recently with some of my colleagues.

We have a division that's focused on disability issues.

And they made the point, which I think is important, which is that some of the heart

and soul of what we do on disability issues involves providing free and appropriate education

for students with disabilities, in the hope that they get the same opportunities that

others do, and that this can help them to reach excellence—and to achieve the same

amount of potential as everyone else.

As we are looking at law enforcement—and I should say I've been there only three and

a half weeks.

This is not just the first disability related organization I've spoken to, this is the first

organization of any kind I've spoken to publicly.

And who better, who better?

So, what we are able to do besides simply policy is to enforce civil rights laws in

cases proactively or in response to complaints.

By way of example, last week—last week we had a complaint that we, that we oversaw in the

midwest, in which happen student came to us and told us that the bathroom stalls in her

school the doors were too heavy, the sizes were not appropriate, they had ramps up the

school incline was not one that was appropriate or consistent with federal law.

And she was literally left behind on various situations—including perhaps most horribly

in multiple, multiple fire evacuation drills.

She was simply left behind, time and time again.

In that case, we worked with the city and the school district to make sure that that

won't happen again.

That they will correct the problems with respect to the ramps, they will correct the problems

with respect to the restrooms, and most of all, they will make sure that no one is left

behind either literally or figuratively.

And that they will provide safety for all Americans.

So, law enforcement is a big part of what we do.

I think Congressman Sherman was helpful in giving a few practical suggestions, that's

something that would be helpful to you as well.

I can't speak to Congress and lobbying— but a couple things I would say in working

with executive branch agencies—if that's of interest.

First, it is very helpful to us to get information about schools in districts

that are not complying with the law.

We like to say that we want to work proactively with institutions to ensure they are compliant

in advance.

But when they are not we need to know about it.

So, if you are aware of problems with schools or colleges or public libraries, please, the

Office for Civil Rights is here to receive those complaints—best if they that are specific.

Best if there is also a student who is harmed by it whom you can identify.

If you can't, there are lots of situations in which we can help anyhow.

If there is a student who is harmed, please do let us know.

I think Representative Sherman used example that there are times you might want to write

to an executive agency, he might have used our agency as an example, to urge particular

kind of civil rights enforcement.

One thing I would suggest in that, is it is very helpful if you have something to bring

to our attention for policy to be specific.

And especially if there are practical ways that you want to make things better.

We get lots of letters from different organizations telling us in very broad or general terms,

that we should enforce civil rights more actively.

What is really helpful if you can use your knowledge or experience, your expertise, to

give us specific examples of things that we ought to be doing, or that schools ought to

be doing colleges or universities should be doing.

We can't think of everything.

So, if you are thinking of very specific, practical suggestions, that is always helpful

to us.

So, let me say in closing, since I have only been with the government for three weeks in

this stint.

I can't take credit for all the good stuff, what I can say is this: It is a real pleasure

to begin by seeing all of you and by being with you today.

I don't know if I can volunteer Ollie, but he'll be here, I'm sure he wouldn't mind

reporting to me any conversations you have with him.

Chelsea Henderson, my colleague, is here as well—we definitely are here to support all

of our country's students.

To the extent that you have any issues involving students, to the extent that you are a student,

or parent of a student, or educator or have concerns, we want to hear from you we are

here to serve.

I thank you very much.

And I wish you the best during your time at this conference.

Can I ask one question?

Sure.

Here is my one question.

Since you are three weeks on the job, we have a lot of young leaders who someday, would

like to have the kind of job that you have.

So, if you were talking to—and now you are—a group of young leaders with and without disabilities

who are thinking about civil rights and advocacy as a career, what advice can you give them

so that someday, A) they can be qualified and have an impact, and B) be ready to be

Senate confirmed.

Well, thank you for that, thank you for that comment of Senate confirmation.

As Jennifer well knows, I just received the overwhelming support of the United States

senate for my confirmation.

Margin of 50 to 46.

So, you can decide how much advice you want to take from me on that score.

But I will say the following about first part of her question—which is, young or not so

young—people who are interested in public service, and interested in government positions—which

may be senate confirmed or not, I think it's important to develop the skills that are appropriate.

At the Office For Civil Rights, we are hiring now.

We'll be looking to hire approximately 65 people.

A lot of them—a lot of these are legal positions not all of them.

They were not all in Washington D.C.

But attorneys are probably the number one position that we hire for our law enforcement function.

So, I would say develop appropriate skills—and for our line of work that means law.

And in law, I would say build abroad evident possible array of skills,.

So that's disability law, but also other fields of civil rights law, because there

are connections.

Civil rights law, but also general law, because you need to look at statutes in the constitutional

context, so you need constitutional law.

You need to look at the administrative process.

So you need administrative law.

And I'll tell you that during my time, founding and leading a public interest advocacy group,

there was really no area of law that wasn't pertinent.

So for example, corporations law became important for some of our cases.

So, what I would say is build the broadest array of skills so that you can be of use.

And I'll say another thing about it.

There are many different ways that you can be of public service.

Certainly, I have chosen to work in government.

I have chosen to work for think tanks.

I established a public interest advocacy group.

But there are other ways as well—whether you are in public interest work or whether

you're not.

When I was with a law firm, we found ways of doing pro bono work.

We found ways of serving on the Board of Directors or other kinds of Boards with nonprofit organizations.

Whether you choose to go full time into this sort of work or not, there will be opportunities

to be of service to society.

And wherever you are, and whatever you do, there is a way of making a contribution if

you have the will.

Ken Marcus, thank you so much.

We really really appreciate it.

Thank you so much.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét