The United States may soon "make a deal" to denuclearize North Korea.
That's coming from President Donald Trump who cited "very positive" behind-the-scenes
developments between the two sides.
He also held a rare solo press conference on Wednesday.
Oh Soo-young shares with us his remarks.
The United States is making "positive progress" on striking a deal with North Korea on denuclearization,...
but isn't rushing to specify a timeline just yet.
This according to U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday,... after attending a gathering
of world leaders at the UN General Assembly.
Addressing criticism he failed to secure a timeline on denuclearization or concrete pledges
from the North,... Trump said there had been substantial follow-up action after his June
12th summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
He said "many things are happening behind the scenes, away from the media," noting U.S.
officials have been holding secret meetings with the North.
Such progress, he said, is likely to produce "good news" in the "coming months and years."
The president also praised North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, as a man he knows and likes,...
expressing confidence Kim also wants a deal to secure peace and prosperity for his regime.
At a press conference later in the day,...
President Trump reiterated he isn't in a hurry to specify a timeline on denuclearizing North
Korea,... saying he has all the time in the world.
"Steve.
I don't wanna get into the time game.
You know why?
I told Mike Pompeo, I said, Mike, don't get into the time.
They're taking down plants, they're taking down a lot of different testing areas.
They're going to take down some more, you'll be hearing about that very soon.
I don't want to get ahead of myself, but you'll be hearing about that soon."
He also insisted he hadn't "given Kim Jong-un anything" amid criticism their Singapore summit
had seen few concessions from North Korea.
President Trump said "until denuclearization occurs," international sanctions on the North
must remain intact,... including those on ship-to-ship transfers which he previously
said are being breached by certain nations.
Oh Soo-young, Arirang News.
For more infomation >> U.S. likely to make deal with North Korea, but no rush for timeline on denuclearization: Trump - Duration: 2:06.-------------------------------------------
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to travel to North Korea in October - Duration: 2:13.
America's top diplomat will travel to North Korea next month.
Mike Pompeo's expected to make some progress on talks to dismantle the regime's nuclear
program...
AND help prepare a second summit between the leaders of Pyeongyang and Washington.
For details let's turn to our Lee Ji-won.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will be traveling to North Korea in October in a fresh
bid to breathe life into the stalled talks between Pyeongyang and Washington.
State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert confirmed the trip on Wednesday shortly after
Secretary Pompeo's meeting with North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho on the sidelines
of the UN General Assembly.
She said Pompeo accepted the North Korean leader's invitation to travel to Pyeongyang
next month to make further progress on the implementation of the Singapore declaration,
including the final, fully verified denuclearization of the North, as well as to prepare for a
second summit between the two leaders.
The trip would be Pompeo's fourth to North Korea, which was initially planned for August
until it got canceled by President Trump as he thought there hadn't been enough progress
made on denuclearization.
Pompeo also tweeted about his "very positive" meeting with his North Korean counterpart.
He uploaded two pictures of them, shaking hands and talking,... and said they discussed
the upcoming summit and the next steps towards the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
Pompeo added that much work remains, but they will continue to move forward.
This comes just hours after Pompeo gave an interview to CBS, where he said the U.S. is
working to get the conditions right so it can accomplish as much as possible during
the second summit.
He added that the summit may happen in October, but it's more likely to happen sometime after
that.
President Trump has also been repeatedly saying during his trip to the UN that he will be
meeting with Kim Jong-un soon.
He said their second meeting will take place much like their first, except for the location.
The two leaders had their historic first-ever North Korea-U.S. summit in Singapore in June.
Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
At UN Security Council, U.S. at odds with China, Russia over N. Korea sanctions - Duration: 2:36.
The UN Security Council met Thursday to discuss the positive developments recently in negotiations
between North Korea and the U.S.
But there was tension between the U.S.... and North Korea's two allies, China and Russia,
over whether the sanctions on the North should stay in place.
Oh Jung-hee reports.
The 15 member nations of the UN Security Council gathered Thursday on the sidelines of the
UN General Assembly... to discuss North Korea.
The meeting came after U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accepted North Korean leader Kim
Jong-un's invitation to Pyeongyang... and after President Trump revealed that he received
another letter from Kim.
Against that backdrop, it was a standoff between the U.S. and North Korea's neighbors China
and Russia... over sanctions.
Secretary Pompeo said they'll have to stay in place until North Korea denuclearizes,
and he credited the sanctions for the progress made up 'til now.
"We must not forget what's brought us this far - the historic, international pressure
campaign that this council has made possible through the sanctions that it imposed.
Enforcement of U.N. Security Council sanctions must continue vigorously and without fail
until we realize the fully, final, verified de-nuclearization."
China and Russia, on the other hand, said the sanctions need to be eased.
China's foreign minister Wang Yi pointed out that one of the Security Council provisions
allows sanctions to be modified if Pyeongyang is found to be complying with them.
"Given the positive developments, China believes that the Security Council needs to consider
invoking in due course this provision to encourage North Korea and other relevant parties to
move denuclearization further ahead."
And Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said...
sanctions can't become an "instrument of collective punishment."
"I would just like to remind you that any negotiations are a two-way street.
North Korea's actions towards gradual disarmament should be followed by easing of sanctions.
There should be reaction towards every action."
North Korea promised it will invite international experts when it dismantles its missile engine
test site... and hinted it could get rid of its key nuclear complex once the U.S. takes
corresponding measures.
But differences remain between the U.S. and the two allies of the North over what comes
next -- Washington in favor of dialogue and sanctions -- Beijing and Moscow calling for
rewards as the process goes forward.
Oh Jung-hee, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
U.S. Supreme Court nominee angrily denies allegations of sexual assault - Duration: 1:09.
U.S. President Donald Trump's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court has angrily and tearfully
denied allegations of sexual assault.
Brett Kavanaugh said the claims made by university professor Christine Blasey Ford were false,
adding his confirmation process had become a "national disgrace".
"This whole two week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with
apparent pent up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election…...
This grotesque and coordinated character assassination will dissuade confident and good people of
all political persuasions from serving our country….."
Ford testified during Thursday's hearing that she was "100 percent" certain that Kavanaugh
was the one who sexually assaulted her during high school.
Kavanaugh was careful not to denounce Ford, saying he didn't doubt the professor may have
been sexually assaulted by someone in some place at some time, but he insisted he had
never assaulted her or anyone.
-------------------------------------------
On the Mark: The state of American politics in the wake of the Kavanaugh/Ford testimony - Duration: 2:09.
-------------------------------------------
U.S. likely to make deal with North Korea, but no rush for timeline on denuclearization: Trump - Duration: 2:05.
The United States may soon "make a deal" to denuclearize North Korea.
That's coming from President Donald Trump who cited "very positive" behind-the-scenes
developments between the two sides,... and a rare solo press conference on Wednesday.
Oh Soo-young shares with us his remarks.
The United States is making "positive progress" on striking a deal with North Korea on denuclearization,...
but isn't rushing to specify a timeline just yet.
This according to U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday,... after attending a gathering
of world leaders at the UN General Assembly.
Addressing criticism he failed to secure a timeline on denuclearization or concrete pledges
from the North,... Trump said there had been substantial follow-up action after his June
12th summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
He said "many things are happening behind the scenes, away from the media," noting U.S.
officials have been holding secret meetings with the North.
Such progress, he said, is likely to produce "good news" in the "coming months and years."
The president also praised North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, as a man he knows and likes,...
expressing confidence Kim also wants a deal to secure peace and prosperity for his regime.
At a press conference later in the day,...
President Trump reiterated he isn't in a hurry to specify a timeline on denuclearizing North
Korea,... saying he has all the time in the world.
"Steve.
I don't wanna get into the time game.
You know why?
I told Mike Pompeo, I said, Mike, don't get into the time.
They're taking down plants, they're taking down a lot of different testing areas.
They're going to take down some more, you'll be hearing about that very soon.
I don't want to get ahead of myself, but you'll be hearing about that soon."
He also insisted he hadn't "given Kim Jong-un anything" amid criticism their Singapore summit
had seen few concessions from North Korea.
President Trump said "until denuclearization occurs," international sanctions on the North
must remain intact,... including those on ship-to-ship transfers which he previously
said are being breached by certain nations.
Oh Soo-young, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
U.S. Supreme Court nominee angrily denies allegations of sexual assault - Duration: 1:08.
U.S. President Donald Trump's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court has angrily and tearfully
denied allegations of sexual assault.
Brett Kavanaugh said the claims made by university professor Christine Blasey Ford were false,
adding his confirmation process had become a "national disgrace".
"This whole two week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with
apparent pent up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election…...
This grotesque and coordinated character assassination will dissuade confident and good people of
all political persuasions from serving our country….."
Ford testified during Thursday's hearing that she was "100 percent" certain that Kavanaugh
was the one who sexually assaulted her during high school.
Kavanaugh was careful not to denounce Ford, saying he didn't doubt the professor may have
been sexually assaulted by someone in some place at some time, but he insisted he had
never assaulted her or anyone.
-------------------------------------------
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to travel to North Korea in October - Duration: 2:14.
America's top diplomat will fly to North Korea next month.
Mike Pompeo's expected to make some progress on talks to dismantle the regime's nuclear
program...
AND help prepare a second summit between the leaders of Pyeongyang and Washington.
For details let's turn to our Lee Ji-won.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will be traveling to North Korea in October in a fresh
bid to breathe life into the stalled talks between Pyeongyang and Washington.
State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert confirmed the trip on Wednesday shortly after
Secretary Pompeo's meeting with North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho on the sidelines
of the UN General Assembly.
She said Pompeo accepted the North Korean leader's invitation to travel to Pyeongyang
next month to make further progress on the implementation of the Singapore declaration,
including the final, fully verified denuclearization of the North, as well as to prepare for a
second summit between the two leaders.
The trip would be Pompeo's fourth to North Korea, which was initially planned for August
until it got canceled by President Trump as he thought there hadn't been enough progress
made on denuclearization.
Pompeo also tweeted about his "very positive" meeting with his North Korean counterpart.
He uploaded two pictures of them, shaking hands and talking,... and said they discussed
the upcoming summit and the next steps towards the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
Pompeo added that much work remains, but they will continue to move forward.
This comes just hours after Pompeo gave an interview to CBS, where he said the U.S. is
working to get the conditions right so it can accomplish as much as possible during
the second summit.
He added that the summit may happen in October, but it's more likely to happen sometime after
that.
President Trump has also been repeatedly saying during his trip to the UN that he will be
meeting with Kim Jong-un soon.
He said their second meeting will take place much like their first, except for the location.
The two leaders had their historic first-ever North Korea-U.S. summit in Singapore in June.
Lee Ji-won, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
Does Affirmative Action Make Us Less Equal? - Duration: 14:25.
Hi, welcome to America Uncovered. I'm your host Chris Chappell.
Asian Americans. Such an incredibly diverse group of people.
Chinese, Indian, Hmong, Cambodian, Bangladeshi...
there are 23 countries in what most people think of as Asia.
That does not include the Middle East, Central Asia,
or that giant part of Russia that everyone forgets about.
Oh, and as if Asians weren't diverse enough,
we throw Pacific Islanders in with them,
because where else are they going to go?
They're stuck in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.
So the question is
how can we lump these people all together to check off a box on a form?
But wait, I know what all Asian Americans have in common!
They're not nearly as likable as other ethnicities.
No, that's not me saying that.
That's what Harvard University says, according to a lawsuit.
"Harvard consistently rated Asian-American applicants lower
than others on traits like 'positive personality,'
likability, courage, kindness and being 'widely respected.'"
Those are allegations in a lawsuit filed against Harvard in 2015
by a coalition of more than 60 Asian American groups.
They're now being represented by Students for Fair Admissions—SFFA.
The group "largely focuses on Asian Americans."
And it's headed by Edward Blum,
a staunch opponent of affirmative action policies.
The lawsuit alleges Harvard University discriminates against Asian Americans
in admission practices—that it's basically affirmative action gone wrong.
Asian Americans as a whole are more likely to have
higher test scores, better grades, and more extracurricular activities.
But despite that,
they have a tougher time gaining access to an Ivy League education.
Which if you think about it,
just perpetuates the problem in a never-ending cycle of Tiger moms.
Harvard has admitted that in a 2013 internal review,
"If Harvard considered only academic achievement,
the Asian-American share of the class would rise to 43 percent
from the actual 19 percent."
Now that would be similar to numbers at universities
like the California Institute of Technology, or the University of California,
where admission is based strictly on academics.
The SFFA adds to their lawsuit claim,
"An Asian-American male applicant with a 25 percent chance of admission
would have a 35 percent chance if he were white,
75 percent chance if he were Hispanic
and 95 percent chance if he were black."
But despite the findings of Harvard's 2013 internal review,
"Instead of taking even the most minor steps to address this problem,
or conducting any further investigation,
Harvard killed the investigation and buried the reports," according to SFFA.
In fact, Harvard has a history of discrimination against Asian Americans.
Asians weren't even recognized as a minority group until 1976,
the same year the school
"[refused] to admit two Chinese women
to a freshman minority orientation banquet."
The SFFA "compare[s] Harvard's treatment of Asian-Americans
with its well-documented campaign
to reduce the growing number of Jews
being admitted to Harvard in the 1920s."
Back then, Harvard didn't want a blatant quota system
since it could generate bad publicity.
Instead, they used a vague, subjective criteria
based on "character, personality and promise."
The court documents call Harvard's discrimination against Jews
the original sin of holistic admissions,
which is a term for accepting students based on qualities that can't be measured.
What's that, Shelley?
Harvard sucks and who would want to go there anyway?
You...got rejected from Harvard, didn't you?
Ok, I won't tell your parents.
The point is, Harvard, like many universities,
has a bad history of racial discrimination.
But attempts to address that discrimination have also been controversial.
Race quotas were ruled unconstitutional in a 1978 Supreme Court case.
But in a 2003 case, the Supreme Court
established that student diversity has inherent value.
And in a 2016 case, the Supreme Court ruled that
"considerable deference is owed to a university
in defining those intangible characteristics,
like student body diversity,
that are central to its identity and educational mission."
Effectively, these Supreme Court decisions
mean that race can be used as one factor among many
to promote student body diversity.
So while having quotas for race is illegal,
you can use other methods to get more students of a certain race
as long as these methods are not based only on race.
And really, is it Harvard's fault if Asians just don't have "positive personalities"?
And if you think that all sounds complicated and vague
in ways that can easily lead to unfairness
you would be right!
Statistically in the US,
Asian Americans outperform Blacks, Latinos, and whites
in high school grades and on SATs.
So under policies like Harvard's,
it's disproportionally harder for Asian Americans to be granted admission.
And this can be even more unfair for some Asian Americans.
Because while lots of Chinese American students make it into top universities,
a lot fewer Laotian, Cambodian, and Hmong students do.
They're even less represented in universities than Blacks,
and often come from poorer backgrounds.
But for admissions purposes,
all Asians get lumped together in a single group.
That's what they get for coming from the largest landmass in the world.
If only Pangea had broken up into smaller pieces.
One Princeton University study
looked at how much advantage and disadvantage
each broad racial group has when applying to elite universities.
It found that "The bonus for African-American applicants
is roughly equivalent to an extra 230 SAT points"
and "185 points for Hispanics".
But "The Asian disadvantage is comparable to a loss of 50 SAT points."
Which means that, on average,
an Asian American would need to score
50 SAT points higher than a white person,
and a whopping 280 points higher than a Black person,
to get merely an equal shot at being admitted.
Wait a minute.
Asian Americans effectively get a 50-point penalty on the SATs?
I think that means that I actually scored higher on the SATs than Shelley! Yes!
Ahem.
Here's a different Princeton study on affirmative action.
It's called "Ending affirmative action
would devastate most minority college enrollment".
Sounds like ending Affirmative Action
would be bad for minority students, right?
Well according the study,
it would result in "sharp declines in the numbers
of African Americans and Hispanics
accepted with little gain for white students."
But "Asian students would fill
nearly four out of every five places in the admitted class
not taken by African-American and Hispanic students."
So in a way, affirmative action sounds like
it's become a form of institutionalized racism
where the biggest victims are Asian Americans.
So what has been the response to the lawsuit against Harvard
the one brought by Students for Fair Admissions?
Well, Harvard has denied wrongdoing.
It defended universities' right to use race as a factor in college admissions.
Others were quick to defend Harvard,
saying this whole thing is a plot by Edward Blum
and the Trump Administration to promote a racist agenda.
This brief in support of Harvard from students and alumni
"condemn" the ones suing Harvard for their
"attempt to manufacture conflict between racial and ethnic groups
in order to revive an unrelenting agenda
to dismantle efforts to create a racially diverse
and inclusive student body through college admissions."
Jeannie Park, the head of the Harvard Asian-American Alumni Alliance
and co-founder of the Coalition for a Diverse Harvard, said
"It's alarming that Trump is aligning himself
with anti-civil rights activist Edward Blum
in this subversive attempt to say that civil rights protections cause discrimination.
Trump does not speak for Asian-Americans, just as Blum does not."
Vox says this is a case of
"The 'racial mascoting' of Asians" by whites
to eliminate Affirmative Action.
But SFFA says it has no intention of promoting a pro-white agenda.
Especially since "White applicants would be most hurt
if Asian-American admissions rose."
In other words, the Trump administration
is being accused of racism
for pushing for universities to ignore race
even though this move would actually hurt white applicants.
So you might be wondering
how is the Trump administration involved in all this?
Well, the Justice Department, which is part of the executive branch,
released this statement of interest about the case.
It says, "Harvard's race-based admissions process
significantly disadvantages Asian-American applicants
compared to applicants of other racial groups
including both white applicants and applicants
from other racial minority groups."
It goes on to say, you know,
Harvard gets millions of taxpayer dollars every year
so the case really should at least be heard in court,
instead of dismissed before trial, like Harvard wants.
That could mean the case eventually goes
all the way to the US Supreme Court,
just like many affirmative action-related cases have
over the last 40 years.
And by that point, the Supreme Court will have
at least two justices appointed by Trump.
And depending on how the Supreme Court rules,
that could change the way colleges and universities
across the country look at affirmative action forever.
This is not the first time the Trump administration
has been accused of setting its sights on affirmative action.
In July, the Education and Justice department
reversed Obama era guidelines on affirmative action.
They said those Obama era guidelines
went beyond what was called for in the Constitution.
Then in August, the New York Times reported the Department of Justice
was redirecting resources to investigate and sue universities
over affirmative action policies that discriminate against whites.
Although as it turns out,
that New York Times report had a major error.
The Justice Department corrected them, saying,
no, the investigation was on the Harvard case
about discrimination against Asian Americans, not whites.
So how did all this whole Affirmative Action thing get started?
Affirmative action began in 1961,
in an executive order by President John F Kennedy.
It called on government contractors to, quote,
"take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed
without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."
In other words, under President Kennedy,
affirmative action meant being blind to race.
But then in 1969, President Richard Nixon
issued the revised Philadelphia Plan.
It called on requiring government contractors to, quote,
"take affirmative action to hire minority workers"
as a way to compensate for the injustices minorities
often faced when they applied for jobs.
Bet you don't think of Nixon promoting affirmative action.
Anyway, as time went on, affirmative action evolved
to not just compensate for the disadvantages minorities may face presently,
but also to compensate for the historical injustices
that minorities have faced in the past.
But redressing historical injustices can be dicey.
Especially considering that Chinese
also faced serious discrimination in the US,
including the Chinese Exclusion Act,
which didn't effectively end until 1965
the same era as the Civil Rights Movement.
But today, Chinese Americans significantly outperform whites in school.
So affirmative action is not helping them.
So there's a wide range of views on affirmative action.
Some say it was necessary once,
but there's been so much progress in 50 years
it's no longer necessary.
Others say we still need it,
because admissions and hiring are still unequal across races.
Still others say that the way current system is being implemented,
it's turned into a form of systemic racism against Asian Americans.
And yet others say white people
are using so-called discrimination of Asian Americans
to justify destroying affirmative action
and oppressing other minorities.
The most recent Supreme Court decision in 2016
on affirmative action was split 4 to 3.
And the court said that that particular case was unique
and their decision to uphold the University of Texas's admissions policy
did not mean that all affirmative action policies were constitutional.
In fact, they said that
"It remains an enduring challenge to our Nation's education system
to reconcile the pursuit of diversity
with the constitutional promise of equal treatment and dignity."
So if the Harvard lawsuit makes it to the Supreme Court,
it could be an interesting case to follow.
So what do you think about the lawsuit against Harvard?
Leave your comments below.
And before you go,
creating a show with this level of research isn't easy.
That's why Shelley, Matt, and I rely on viewer support
to buy coffee so we can keep making this show.
Precious, precious coffee.
So join us by going to our crowdfunding website Patreon,
and contribute a dollar or more per episode.
As a way of saying thanks,
you'll get to have a say in what future episodes we make.
So head over to patreon.com/americauncovered.
Once again I'm your host Chris Chappell.
Thanks for watching America Uncovered.
-------------------------------------------
US economy grows 4.2% in second quarter - Duration: 6:56.
-------------------------------------------
The National for September 27, 2018 — U.S. Senate Testimony, NAFTA, At Issue - Duration: 46:36.
>> TO WHAT DEGREE OF CERTAINTY
DO YOU BELIEVE BRETT KAVANAUGH
ASSAULTED YOU?
>> 100%.
>> I'M NOT QUESTIONING THAT DR.
FORD MAY HAVE BEEN SEXUALLY
ASSAULTED BY SOME PERSON, IN
SOME PLACE, AT SOME TIME.
BUT I HAVE NEVER DONE THIS TO
HER OR TO ANYONE.
>> Rosemary: ON THIS THURSDAY
NIGHT, HE SAID-SHE SAID,
TESTIMONY THAT DIVIDES PEOPLE,
POLITICAL PARTIES AND AN ENTIRE
NATION.
CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD AND BRETT
KAVANAUGH TELL THEIR STORIES AS
A CONSERVATIVE AND LIFETIME
SUPREME COURT SEAT HANGS IN THE
BALANCE.
>> Andrew: WE'LL LACK AT WHAT
THEY SAID, HOW WAS RECEIVED
INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE ROOM AND
WHY REPUBLICAN SENATORS LEFT
THEIR QUESTIONS TO A FEMALE
PROSECUTOR.
EDGE OF THE SEAT MIX OF MEMORY,
POLITICS AND CULTURE.
THIS IS "THE NATIONAL".
>> Rosemary: IT WAS EMOTIONAL,
DRAMATIC AND AT TIMES EXTREMELY
POLITICAL.
A U.S. SUPREME COURT
CONFIRMATION HEARING THAT FELT
MORE LIKE A TRIAL.
FOR BOTH BRETT KAVANAUGH AND THE
WOMAN ACCUSING HIM OF SEXUAL
ASSAULT.
PAUL HUNTER WALKS US THROUGH
WHAT WAS AN EXPLOSIVE DAY IN
WASHINGTON.
>> DO YOU WARE SWEAR --
>> Reporter: THERE SHE WAS,
CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD SET TO GO.
AND THEN SEPARATELY BRETT
KAVANAUGH.
BOTH SWEARING TO TELL THE TRUTH
EACH WITH AN UTTERLY DIFFERENT
STORY.
>> WHEN I GOT THE TO THE --
>> Reporter: FIRST, IT WAS
FORD'S HARROWING TALE OF SEXUAL
ASSAULT AT A HIGH SCHOOL
GATHERING 36 YEARS AGO.
>> I WAS PUSHED ONTO THE BED.
AND BRETT GOT ON TOP OF ME.
>> Reporter: LOCKED IN A
BEDROOM, SHE DESCRIBED KAVANAUGH
AS VISIBLY DRUNK, GROPING HER,
PULLING AT HER CLOTHES.
>> I BELIEVED HE WAS GOING TO
RAPE ME.
I TRIED TO YELL FOR HELP.
WHEN I DID, BRETT PUT HIS HAND
OVERMY MOUTH.
I THOUGHT BRETT WAS GOING TO
ACCIDENTALLY KILL ME.
>> Reporter: KAVANAUGH AND A
FRIEND WITH HIM WERE LAUGHING,
AS SHE PUT IT UPROARIOUSLY.
IT'S HAUNTED HER EVER SINCE.
>> THIS COULD NOT BE A CASE OF
MISTAKEN IDENTITY?
>> ABSOLUTELY NOT.
>> Reporter: SHE'S COMING
FORWARD FOR CIVIC DUTY.
BUT IF FORD WAS MEASURED, COME
HIS TURN, KAVANAUGH SEEMED
ENRAGED.
>> THIS IS A CIRCUS.
THE CONSEQUENCES WILL EXTEND
LONG PAST MY UNANIMOUS NATION.
THE CONSEQUENCES WILL BE WITH US
FOR DECADES.
YOU'VE REPLACED ADVICE AND
CONSENT WITH SEARCH AND DESTROY.
>> Reporter: HE CALLED IT
LAST-MINUTE SMEARS, A LEFT WING
CONSPIRACY DENYING EVERY
ACQUISITION.
AT TIMES CHOKING UP.
HERE, NOTING HIS YOUNG DAUGHTER
PRAYS FOR CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD.
>> WE MEAN NO ILL-WILL.
>> Reporter: STILL KAVANAUGH'S
FURY WAS EVIDENT, CONDEMNING THE
PROCESS, BLAMING DEMOCRATS FOR A
CALCULATED POLITICAL HIT AND
EMPHASIZING --
>> I WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED
INTO WITHDRAWING FROM THIS
PROCESS.
YOU'VE TRIED HARD.
>> Reporter: LIKEWISE DEMOCRATS
WERE UNDETERRED, PRESSING
KAVANAUGH ON ASPECTS HE WAS
UNCOMFORTABLE WITH.
IS HE NOW OPEN TO A DEEPER
INVESTIGATION.
>> I WELCOME WHATEVER THE
COMMITTEE WANTS TO DO BECAUSE
I'M TELLING THE TRUTH.
I'M TELLING THE TRUTH.
>> I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU WANT
TO DO, JUDGE.
>> I'M INNOCENT OF THIS.
THEY DO INVESTIGATE QUESTIONS.
AND YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS,
JUDGE, YOU CAN'T SAY HERE IN THE
BEGINNING --
>> I WANT --
>> -- ANY KIND OF INVESTIGATION.
>> THIS THING WAS SPRUNG ON ME.
>> Reporter: SO IT WENT, WITH
KAVANAUGH ALWAYS RETURNING TO
ONE MAIN POINT.
>> BUT I SWEAR TODAY UNDER OATH
BEFORE THE SENATE AND THE
NATION, BEFORE MY FAMILY AND
GOD, I AM INNOCENT OF THIS
CHARGE.
>> Reporter: HAVING HEARD ALL OF
THAT, THE QUESTION FOR U.S.
SENATORS NOW IS BRETT KAVANAUGH
WORTHY OF SITTING ON THE SUPREME
COURT FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE?
IS THERE ANY REASON TO THINK HE
MAY BE UNFIT FOR THE JOB?
DO YOU BELIEVE HIM OR HER?
>> Rosemary: THE PRESIDENT HAS
BEEN VOCAL ABOUT THIS, SAYING
YESTERDAY HE WAS GOING TO WATCH
AND SEE HOW IT PLAYED OUT.
WHAT IS HE SAYING TONIGHT?
>> Reporter: RECALL LAST NIGHT
DONALD TRUMP SUGGESTED WHILE HE
STILL BACKED KAVANAUGH, HIS MIND
COULD CHANGE ON THAT DEPENDING
ON TODAY'S TESTIMONY.
NO SOONER DID IT END HE TWEETED.
HIS TESTIMONY WAS POWERFUL,
HONEST AND RIVETING.
HE LABELLED DEMOCRATS
DISGRACEFUL AND THE PROCESS A
SHAM.
>> Rosemary: KAVANAUGH'S
SELF-DEFENCE WAS FIERCE AND
MOTIVATED HIS SUPPORTERS INSIDE
THE COURTROOM AND OUT OF THE
COMMITTEE HEARING ROOM.
WHILE FORD'S ENERGY WAS CALMER,
IT WAS NO LESS POWERFUL.
>> THE ASSAULT ON ME DRASTICALLY
ALTERED MY LIFE.
FOR A LONG TIME I WAS TOO AFRAID
TO TELL ANYONE THESE DETAILS.
I DID NOT WANT TO TELL MY
PARENTS THAT I AT AGE 15 WAS IN
A HOUSE WITHOUT ANY PARENTS
PRESENT DRINKING BEER WITH BOY.
ONCE HE WAS SELECTED AND IT
SEEMED IT WAS A SURE VOTE, I WAS
CALCULATING DAILY THE RISK
BENEFIT FOR ME OF COMING FORWARD
AND I WOULD JUST BE PERSONALLY
ANNIHILATED.
>> WHAT IS THE STRONGEST MEMORY
YOU CANNOT FORGET?
>> THE LAUGHTER, THE UPROARIOUS
LAUGHTER BETWEEN THE TWO.
AND THEIR HAVING FUN AT MY
EXPENSE.
I WAS UNDERNEATH ONE OF THEM
WHILE THE TWO LAUGHED.
TWO FRIENDS HAVING A REALLY GOOD
TIME WITH ONE ANOTHER.
>> Rosemary: IT WASN'T JUST HIGH
EMOTION INSIDE THE ROOM.
DEMONSTRATORS ON BOTH SIDES
TURNED OUT IN BIG NUMBERS.
WE'LL SEE SOME OF THOSE BACKING
JUDGE KAVANAUGH A LITTLE LATER,
BUT HERE'S A LOOK AT SOME OF
THOSE WHO STOOD BEHIND FORD.
[ * ]
* GOING TO KEEP ON WALKING
>> Rosemary: SOME PEACEFULLY
SANG TO SHOW SOLIDARITY.
OTHERS STRUCK A MORE FORCEFUL
TONE.
>> WE BELIEVE!
>> Rosemary: THESE DEMONSTRATORS
MADE NO BONES ABOUT WHAT THEY
WANTED TO SEE.
>> WE'LL DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO
KEEP BRETT KAVANAUGH OFF THE
SUPREME COURT.
>> WE BELIEVE IN HER!
>> Rosemary: ONE LARGE GROUP OF
PROTESTERS TRIED TO BLOCK THE
STREET ACROSS FROM THE SUPREME
COURT UNTIL THE POLICE MOVED IN.
IN NEW YORK, A GROUP OF WOMEN
DID MORE THAN SPEAK UP FOR
BLASEY FORD, THEY SCREAMED AT
THE TOP OF THEIR LUNGS.
STEVEN D'SOUZA TELLS US WHY.
>> WE BELIEVE CHRISTINE!
WE BELIEVE SURVIVORS!
>> Reporter: AS THE HEARING
BROKE FOR LUNCH, THE EMOTION
THESE WOMEN FELT WATCHING
CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD ERUPTED.
[SCREAMING]
>> Reporter: THEIR RAGE IS
PROMPTED BY THIS.
>> BRETT PUT HIS HAND OVER MY
MOUTH TO STOP ME FROM YELLING.
>> I THINK WHEN WE WERE ALL
TOGETHER HERE, IT SEEMED TO MAKE
SENSE TO SCREAM ON HER BEHALF.
>> IT FELT LIKE SHE WAS ON TRIAL
AS THE VICTIM WHICH IS REALLY
PAINFUL TO WATCH.
WHEN SHE TALKS ABOUT SMALL
DETAILS LIKE REMEMBERING THEIR
LAUGHTER.
THAT'S THE KIND OF THING THAT
RINGS TRUE.
AND I THINK IT PROBABLY AFFECTS
MORE WOMEN THAN A LOT OF PEOPLE
ARE AWARE OF.
>> Reporter: BRINGING THAT
PERSONAL STRUGGLE TO A VERY
PUBLIC STAGE IS WHY SOME CALL
THIS A DEFINING MOMENT FOR
AMERICA.
>> THE IMPORTANT THING, THERE IS
PUBLIC OUTRAGE.
THERE IS A POLITICAL, LARGER
POLITICAL MOVEMENT AND RECKONING
THAT IS NOT OK, THIS IS NOT
ACCEPTABLE.
>> Reporter: STILL SOME WORRY
KAVANAUGH'S NOMINATION WILL GO
AHEAD REGARDLESS OF WHAT WAS
SAID TODAY.
>> IT KIND OF DESTROYS ME.
IT TAKES AWAY A LOT OF FAITH IN
OUR SYSTEM.
>> Reporter: A MESSAGE THEY FEAR
THAT SOME IN THE SENATE WON'T
EVEN CONSIDER.
STEVEN D'SOUZA, CBC NEWS, NEW
YORK.
>> Rosemary: WE'VE HEARD MANY
TIMES OVER THE PAST YEAR AND
MORE HOW DIFFICULT IT IS FOR
WOMEN TO COME FORWARD WITH THESE
ALLEGATIONS OF PAST SEXUAL
ASSAULT.
THAT TODAY'S LANDMARK HEARING,
DID IT OPEN ANY SPACE THERE FOR
OTHERS TO TAKE THE LEAP OF
FAITH?
IOANNA ROUMELIOTIS ASKED SOMEONE
WHO HAS BEEN THROUGH SOMETHING
LIKE THIS IN CANADA.
>> Reporter: BEFORE #METOO, THE
STORIES WERE LONELIER.
AS ONE OF JIAN GHOMESHI'S
ACCUSERS, LINDA REDGRAVE'S
TESTIMONY WAS SHREDDED.
WATCHING THIS BRINGS IT ALL
BACK.
>> IT'S SO HARD TO BE UP THERE
IN FRONT OF THE PUBLIC AND
TRYING TO TELL YOUR STORY AND
HAVE THEM DISSECTING IT.
>> Reporter: THE JIAN GHOMESHI
TRIAL STARTED THE RECKONING OF
THE SEXUAL VIOLENCE.
BUT FOR EVERY NEW HASH TAG,
REDGRAVE SAYS THERE IS STILL THE
SAME OLD QUESTIONS.
>> PEOPLE ARE NOW STARTING TO
UNDERSTAND THERE ISN'T A CERTAIN
SCIENCE TO THE WAY PEOPLE
RESPOND AND REACT TO TRAUMA OR
TO SEXUAL VIOLENCE.
I THINK WE'VE COME A LONG WAY IN
THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS AND I'M
REALLY HAPPY FOR THAT, BUT I'M
REALLY SAD THERE ARE SO MANY
PEOPLE THAT NEEDED TO SUFFER
PUBLICLY BECAUSE OF IT.
>> HOW OLD WERE YOU AT THE TIME?
>> I WAS IN THE SECOND GRADE.
>> Reporter: AND MORE WOMEN ARE
SPEAKING OUT.
A POLITICAL SHOW GOT AN
UNEXPECTED CALL PROMPTED BY
TODAY'S TESTIMONY.
>> AND I THOUGHT I WAS OVER
THIS --
>> Reporter: A 76-YEAR-OLD WOMAN
SHARING THE STORY OF HER ASSAULT
WHEN SHE WAS IN GRADE SCHOOL.
AND ON SOCIAL MEDIA, CELEBRITIES
BROKE THEIR SILENCE.
>> OUR MISSION IS TO INVESTIGATE
EVERY CASE --
>> Reporter: POLICE IN TORONTO
BELIEVE THE #METOO MOVEMENT IS A
BIG FACTOR BEHIND A 16% SPIKE IN
REPORTS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE
LAST YEAR.
BUT WHILE THE FLOODGATES OPEN,
AND HOT LINES, TOO, CRISIS
CENTRES LIKE THIS ONE ADMIT THEY
DON'T HAVE THE FUNDING TO KEEP
UP.
>> THEY MIGHT CALL US AND ASK
FOR SUPPORT AND WE HAVE TO TELL
THEM THERE IS A TWO-YEAR WAIT
LIST BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE
ENOUGH FUNDING.
I THINK IT BEGS THE QUESTION,
WHAT ARE WE ASKING SURVIVORS TO
COME INTO?
>> Reporter: IT CAN BE AVOIDED.
REDGRAVE CREATED HER OWN SUPPORT
GROUP FOR SURVIVORS AND SEES
TODAY AS A WIN.
>> SO WHERE IS THE VICTORY?
>> THE VICTORY IS IN HER BEING
BRAVE ENOUGH TO COME FORWARD AND
SPEAK OUT AGAINST SOMEBODY.
>> Reporter: WHATEVER THE
OUTCOME.
IOANNA ROUMELIOTIS, CBC NEWS,
TORONTO.
>> Rosemary: WE SHOULD MAKE IT
CLEAR THAT BRETT KAVANAUGH HAS
HIS OWN SUPPORTERS AND MANY ARE
WOMEN.
SOME OF THEM VOICED THAT SUPPORT
TODAY.
>> WHAT WE'RE SEEING HERE,
UNFORTUNATELY, IS A PATTERN OF
DEMOCRATS PUSHING FORWARD
ALLEGATIONS THAT AS SOON AS YOU
PRESS ON THEM, START TO FALL
APART.
THEY DON'T ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT
WHAT HAPPENED 35 YEARS AGO.
THEY CARE ABOUT WHAT HE'S GOING
TO DO FOR THE NEXT 30 YEARS.
WE HAVE LEADERS WHO ARE WILLING
TO TURN UPSIDE DOWN A SACRED
PRINCIPLE OF THE PRESUMPTION OF
INNOCENCE FOR WHATEVER MOTIVE.
THAT IS DANGEROUS.
AS WOMEN, AS MOMS, AS WIVES, AS
SISTERS, AS DAUGHTERS, WE SHOULD
BE VERY CONCERNED AND DEMAND
NOTHING BUT FAIRNESS.
>> Rosemary: WE HEAR FROM THE
NOMINEE IN PAUL'S PIECE THERE,
BUT BRETT KAVANAUGH LASHED OUT
AT THE WAY THE ALLEGATIONS HAVE
BEEN TREATED AND GOT FIERY
SUPPORT FROM A POLITICAL
VETERAN.
>> THIS GROTESQUE AND
COORDINATED CHARACTER
ASSASSINATION WILL DISSUADE
COMPETENT AND GOOD PEOPLE OF ALL
POLITICAL PERSUASIONS FROM
SERVING OUR COUNTRY.
YES, WE WENT TO PARTIES, YES, OF
COURSE, WE WENT TO PARTIES AND
THE YEARBOOK PAGE DESCRIBES THAT
AND KIND OF MAKES FUN OF IT.
AND YOU KNOW, IF WE WANT TO SIT
HERE AND TALK ABOUT WHETHER A
SUPREME COURT NOMINATION SHOULD
BE BASED ON A HIGH SCHOOL
YEARBOOK PAGE, I THINK THAT'S
TAKING US TO A NEW LEVEL OF
ABSURDITY.
>> THIS IS THE MOST UNETHICAL
SHAM SINCE I'VE BEEN IN
POLITICS.
AND IF YOU REALLY WANTED TO KNOW
THE TRUTH, YOU SURE AS HELL
WOULDN'T HAVE DONE WHAT YOU'VE
DONE TO THIS GUY.
ARE YOU A GANG RAPIST?
>> NO.
>> I CANNOT IMAGINE WHAT YOU AND
YOUR FAMILY HAVE GONE THROUGH.
BOY, YOU WANT POWER, GOD I HOPE
YOU NEVER GET IT.
>> Rosemary: DAVID WAS TODAY A
FAIR EXERCISE, A USEFUL ONE?
>> IT CERTAINLY IS NOT.
THE PEOPLE WHO HAD POWER OVER
THE HEARING CERTAINLY ARE NOT
HERE TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF
WHAT HAPPENED.
THEY'RE HERE TO NOT SEEM TO
SQUELCH DR. FORD THE WAY ANITA
HILL WAS.
IN THAT SENSE, IT'S DESIGNED TO
SIMULATE A FAIR PROCESS, BUT
IT'S NOT A FAIR PROCESS.
WE ALL THINK WE'RE GOOD JUDGES
OF OTHER PEOPLE.
WE PROJECT OURSELVES ON OTHER
PEOPLE.
WE LOOK AT THE WORST KIND OF
EVIDENCE IS THIS WITNESS
TESTIMONY.
BECAUSE WHAT WE HEAR, WE THINK
WE'RE HEARING SOMEONE ELSE,
WE'RE LOOKING INTO A MIRROR AND
HEARING OURSELVES.
>> Rosemary: WHAT STRUCK ME WAS
WHEN HE TALKED ABOUT THE FACT HE
WAS A VICTIM OF THE CLINTONS
BECAUSE OF HIS INVOLVEMENT IN
THE KEN STARR REPORT.
HERE'S PART OF THE OPENING
STATEMENT.
>> THIS WHOLE TWO-WEEK EFFORT
HAS BEEN A CALCULATED AND
ORCHESTRATED POLITICAL HIT
FUELLED WITH APPARENT PENT-UP
ANGER ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND
THE 2016 ELECTION, FEAR THAT HAS
BEEN UNFAIRLY STOKED ABOUT MY
JUDICIAL RECORD, REVENGE ON
BEHALF OF THE CLINTONS, AND
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN MONEY
FROM OUTSIDE LEFT WING
OPPOSITION GROUPS.
>> Rosemary: SO WHAT DOES THAT
TELL US ABOUT HIM AND WHETHER HE
IS GIVING THAT RATHER PARTISAN
GIVEN, WHETHER HE'S EVEN SUITED
FOR THE JOB?
>> WELL, IT IS TRUE HE IS --
WE'VE HAD PARTISAN SUPREME COURT
JUSTICES BEFORE.
LET'S NOT HAVE ILLUSIONS ABOUT
THAT.
BUT WHAT WAS STRIKING ABOUT THE
OPENING STATEMENT HOW MUCH WAS
FOR THE FOX NEWS AUDIENCE.
I DON'T KNOW THAT PEOPLE KNOW
WHAT BORKING IS, WITH HEARINGS
OF ROBERT BORK.
IT WAS A STATEMENT FROM THE
HEART OF THE CONSERVATIVE WORLD
SPEAKING TO A CONSERVATIVE
AUDIENCE.
JUST AS DONALD TRUMP IS TRYING
TO BE PRESIDENT FOR ONLY PART OF
THE AMERICA, BRETT KAVANAUGH IS
SPEAKING TO PART OF AMERICA TO
SUPPORT HIM TO GET HIMSELF ONTO
THE SUPREME COURT.
>> Rosemary: WATCHING THAT FROM
HERE, IT WAS ASTOUNDING.
WHAT SHOULD WE AS CANADIANS TAKE
FROM THE FACT THAT THIS IS
PLAYING OUT THERE IN THE WAY
THAT IT IS?
>> WELL, IT CERTAINLY MAKES YOU
THINK THAT AMERICAN SYSTEM OF
NOMINATING AND APPROVING JUDGES
IS ONE NOT TO BE EMULATED.
WHAT YOU WANT IS HAVE THESE
ALLEGATIONS HEARD IN PRIVATE,
BECAUSE IT'S A COMPLICATED
MATTER.
IF BRETT KAVANAUGH IS RIGHT, HIS
REPUTATION WILL NEVER RECOVER
FROM THESE THINGS AIRED IN
PUBLIC.
THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN SCREENED
BY THE F.B.I. IN PRIVATE.
AND DOES THAT PRIVATE FACT
FINDING SHOULD HAVE BEEN SETTLED
BEFORE THE HEARING TOOK PLACE.
THE WAY THIS IS BEING BATTLED IS
ONE THAT IF HE IS CONFIRMED WILL
LEAVE MANY PEOPLE FEELING THE
SUPREME COURT CONTAINS A PERSON
GUILTY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.
IF HE IS DEFEATED, AGAIN IT WILL
CONTINUE TO POLITICIZE THE
SUPREME COURT.
>> Rosemary: YOU SAY IT'S LESS
LIKELY HE'LL BE TURNED DOWN?
>> THE REPUBLICANS HAVE THE
VOTE.
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN MORE PROBABLE
THAN NOT HE WOULD GET CONFIRMED.
BUT THE THING THAT WOULD CHANGE
THIS, IF THE REPUBLICANS SEE A
LOT OF POLLS THAT A LOT OF
REPUBLICAN SEATS ARE IN TROUBLE
THAN WERE IN TROUBLE THREE DAYS
AGO, THAT MAY CHANGE MINDS.
>> Rosemary: HOW MUCH IS ABOUT
THE MIDTERMS AND THE POLITICAL
CLIMATE?
>> A LOT OF IT IS ABOUT THE
MIDTERMS, BUT REPUBLICANS ARE
WILLING TO TRADE SENATE SEATS
FOR THE SUPREME COURT SEAT.
IS IT ONE THAT LOCKS IN A COURT
THAT HAD A 4-4 DIVISION WITH ONE
FLOATING JUDGE, JUDGE ANTHONY
KENNEDY, HIS NOMINATION,
KAVANAUGH'S NOMINATION LOCKS IN
A 5-4 CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY.
>> Rosemary: THANK YOU FOR YOUR
TIME TONIGHT.
THE SENATE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO VOTE ON THIS
TOMORROW AND IF THEY APPROVE
JUDGE KAVANAUGH'S NOMINATION,
THEY WILL MOVE TO A VOTE OF THE
FULL SENATE.
>> Andrew: IT BEARS MENTIONING
AS THE FORD-KAVANAUGH HEARING
WAS PLAYING OUT, DONALD TRUMP
WAS SUPPOSED TO MEET WITH DEPUTY
ATTORNEY GENERAL, ROD
ROSENSTEIN, AND THERE WAS
SPECULATION HE WOULD BE FIRED.
THAT MEETING WAS PUT OFF.
THE WHITE HOUSE SAYS BOTH SIDES
AGREED TO MEET NEXT WEEK TO
AVOID INTERFERING WITH THE
HEARING.
AT ISSUE, A "NEW YORK TIMES"
REPORT THAT ROSENSTEIN DISCUSSED
RECORDING TRUMP AND WORK TO
REMOVE HIM FROM OFFICE.
>>> HERE IN CANADA, THE HOUSE OF
COMMONS VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO
STRIP MYANMAR'S LEADER AUNG SAN
SUU KYI OF HER HONORARY CANADIAN
CITIZENSHIP.
THERE HAD BEEN GROWING PRESSURE
TO DO SO IN THE WAKE OF THE
ROHINGYA CRISIS.
SOMETHING THIS COUNTRY HAS
CHARACTERIZED AT GENOCIDE.
THE MOVE DOES REQUIRE A GREEN
LIGHT FROM THE SENATE.
>>> I'M CALLING GALLANT TO DO
THE HONOURABLE THING AND
RECOGNIZE HE LOST THE ELECTION.
>> Andrew: ANOTHER DAY AND
POLITICAL DRAMA IN NEW
BRUNSWICK.
BLAINE HIGGS CALLS ON THE
LIBERAL LEADER TO RESIGN.
NEITHER PARTY WON ENOUGH SEATS
IN MONDAY'S ELECTION FOR A
MAJORITY, BUT WHILE THE P.C.s
CAME OUT AHEAD, THE LIBERALS
HOPE AN ALLIANCE WITH THE GREENS
WILL KEEP THEM IN POWER.
HIGGS WANTS THE LEGISLATURE
CALLED BACK AND A CONFIDENCE
VOTE HELD, WHICH DEPENDING ON
HOW IT GOES, COULD PUT THE P.C.s
IN A POSITION TO GOVERN.
STILL AHEAD... CRITICS CALL HIS
VIEWS ANTI-MUSLIM, BUT TOMMY
ROBINSON SEES HIMENTS AS --
HIMSELF AS A FREE SPEECH
ACTIVIST.
>> Rosemary: COULD WE SEE THE
SAME STORY PLAY OUT IN QUÉBEC?
>> TRUMP SAYS HE DOESN'T LIKE
CHRYSTIA FREELAND.
WHY THAT MIGHT PLAY A BIG PART
IN THE NAFTA NEGOTIATIONS.
>> Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau: AMERICANS ARE FINDING
THAT THE NEGOTIATIONS ARE TOUGH
BECAUSE CANADIANS
>> Andrew: YOU'VE PROBABLY HEARD
ABOUT DONALD TRUMP'S HARSH
COMMENTS ABOUT FOREIGN AFFAIRS
MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND.
TONIGHT, TRUMP'S ENVOY TO CANADA
IS DIALLING THAT BACK AND DOING
DAMAGE CONTROL.
KELLY CRAFT IS CALLING FREELAND
SMART, ARTICULATE AND HER
COMMENTS CAP A WHOLE DAY OF
SUPPORT FOR FREELAND.
HERE'S KATIE SIMPSON.
>> Reporter: IF THE PRIME
MINISTER IS BOTHERED BY DONALD
TRUMP'S INSULTS, HE'S NOT
LETTING IT SHOW.
>> Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau: THE AMERICANS ARE
FINDING THAT THE NEGOTIATIONS
ARE TOUGH, BECAUSE CANADIANS ARE
TOUGH NEGOTIATORS.
>> Reporter: MEMBERS OF CABINET
FIERCELY DEFENDED THE WOMAN
LEADING CANADA'S NAFTA
NEGOTIATION TEAM.
>> I THINK MINISTER FREELAND IS
DOING AN OUTSTANDING JOB AT A
DIFFICULT TASK ON BEHALF OF ALL
CANADIANS AND I THINK ALL
CANADIANS OUGHT TO BE VERY
GRATEFUL.
>> Reporter: THERE WERE NO KIND
WORDS FROM DONALD TRUMP
YESTERDAY WHEN HE LASHED OUT AT
CHRYSTIA FREELAND WITHOUT USING
HER NAME.
>> WE'RE VERY UNHAPPY WITH THE
NEGOTIATIONS AND THE NEGOTIATING
STYLE OF CANADA.
WE DON'T LIKE THEIR
REPRESENTATIVE VERY MUCH.
>> Reporter: IT IS NO SECRET
THERE IS TENSION IN THE NAFTA
NEGOTIATING ROOM WHERE BIG
PERSONALITIES COMPETE AND AT
TIMES CAN CLASH.
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER SOME OF
THAT ANIMOSITY IS
SELF-INFLICTED.
>> COMPETENT AND HONESTY AMONG
ELECTED LEADERS AND IN OUR
PUBLIC SERVICE MATTER.
>> Reporter: THE U.S. NOTICED
WHEN FREELAND CRITICIZED TRUMP
AT A REWARDS RECEPTION IN
WASHINGTON THIS SUMMER AND
PARTICIPATED IN A PANEL
DISCUSSION IN TORONTO CALLED
TAKING ON THE TYRANT, WHERE A
VIDEO COMPARED TRUMP TO THE
REGIME OF RUSSIA AND CHINA.
THIS FORMER TRADE NEGOTIATOR
SAYS TRUMP APPEARS TO BE
OVERREACTING.
>> IF HE ALLOWS THAT KIND OF
PETTY ISSUE TO NAG HIM, THEN HE
IS TELLING US MORE ABOUT HIMSELF
THAN HE SHOULD.
>> Reporter: TRUMP'S PERSONAL
TEMP RA MMENT MAY BE A FACTOR.
>> THE PRESIDENT SEEMS TO HAVE
DIFFICULTY WITH WOMEN, SO STRONG
SMART WOMEN CAUSE THEM PROBLEMS.
>> Reporter: WHETHER THEY LIKE
EACH OTHER OR NOT, FREELAND HAS
TO SIT DOWN WITH U.S.
NEGOTIATORS AT SOME POINT, BUT
RIGHT NOW THERE ARE NO CONCRETE
PLANS FOR ANOTHER ROUND OF
FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS.
>> Rosemary: STILL AHEAD ON "THE
NATIONAL", FIRST WE SAW A
MINORITY GOVERNMENT IN B.C.
THEN IN NEW BRUNSWICK, VOTERS
ARE SENDING A MESSAGE.
BUT IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
LISTENING?
THE "AT ISSUE" PANEL IS HERE.
>> Andrew: ALL EYES WERE ON THE
KAVANAUGH HEARING.
HOW THE WORLD SEEMED TO STOP AND
WATCH.
>> I THINK OUR KIDS A
ASK OUR OFFICIALS TO REACH OUT
TO HOPEFULLY START DISCUSSIONS
WITH THE GREEN PARTY TO SEE IF
THERE COULD BE SOME TYPE OF
AGREEMENT WHERE WE COULD
MAINTAIN THE CONFIDENCE OF THE
HOUSE.
IT'S EVIDENT HE'S DESPERATE TO
HOLD ONTO POWER.
>> Rosemary: NEW BRUNSWICK IS IN
A POLITICAL DEAD LOCK.
WORDS YOU NEVER THOUGHT YOU'D
HEAR ME SAY.
LIBERAL LEADER, THE PREMIER
STILL, BRIAN GALLANT WANTS THE
FIRST CRACK AT FORMING
GOVERNMENT.
HE'S TURNED TO THE GREEN PARTY
FOR HELP.
THE CONSERVATIVE LEADER BLAINE
HIGGS IS NOT GOING DOWN WITHOUT
A FIGHT.
ALL THIS DAYS BEFORE ANOTHER BIG
ELECTION IN THE COUNTRY, QUÉBEC.
COULD THERE BE THE SAME KIND OF
OUTCOME AND HOW IS OTTAWA
READING THE RESULTS?
"AT ISSUE" IS HERE WITH THAT AND
MORE.
ANDREW COYNE, ALTHIA RAJ.
IT'S NOT OFTEN WE DO "AT ISSUE"
ABOUT PROVINCIAL POLITICS, BUT
THERE ARE INTERESTING THINGS
HAPPENING HERE.
I THINK WE CAN LOOK AT WRIT
LARGE, FEDERALLY.
LET'S START WITH WHAT HAPPENED
IN NEW BRUNSWICK.
I'LL PUT THIS ONE TO YOU,
ANDREW.
HOW DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD READ
THE RESULTS?
WE KNOW THE LIBERALS ARE GOING
TO TRY TO HOLD ONTO POWER, EVEN
BRIAN GALLANT SAYING UNTIL
CHRISTMAS, BUT WHAT DOES THAT
TELL US ABOUT THE WAY
FIRST-PAST-THE-POST IS WORKING
IN THIS COUNTRY OR AT LEAST IN
NEW BRUNSWICK RIGHT NOW?
>> WELL, IT'S DEJA VU, THIS
LOOKS LIKE THE B.C. ELECTION
LAST YEAR.
AND THERE IS COMMONALITIES.
ONE IS WE'RE STARTING TO SEE
MORE PARTIES IN THE POLITICAL
LANDSCAPE.
WE DON'T HAVE TO TWO-PARTY
POLITICS IN A LOT OF THE
PROVINCES.
AND FIRST-PAST-THE-POST IS
REALLY SUITED TO THAT, YOU GET
CLEAR RESULTS WHEN THERE IS A
TWO-PARTY SYSTEM, BUT WHEN YOU
GET, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, IT GETS
COMPLICATED AND YOU CAN GET
THESE RESULT, NOT ALWAYS OF
COURSE, BUT WHERE YOU HAVE TWO
PARTIES WITH ALMOST THE SAME
STANDING AND THIS KIND OF
SHOWDOWN THAT COMES AFTERWARDS.
I THINK WHAT IS ALSO INTERESTING
TO POINT OUT IS WHAT IS NOT
HAPPENING.
IT'S HAPPENING IN B.C. AS WELL.
YOU DON'T SEE THE PARTIES
CAPITULATING TO ONE ANOTHER.
YOU DON'T SEE THE LARGER PARTY
GIVING THE SMALL PARTY WHATEVER
THEY WANT.
THIS IS RELEVANT BECAUSE WHEN
PEOPLE TALK ABOUT PROPORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION, THEY SAY THIS IS
THE SCENARIO YOU'LL GET WITH THE
LARGE PARTIES AND SMALL PARTIES
AND THE LARGE PARTIES WILL GIVE
IN TO THE EXTREMIST FRINGE
PARTIES.
THE REASON YOU'RE NOT SEEING
THAT HAPPEN, THEY'RE ALL GOING
TO HAVE A FACE ELECTION AGAIN.
IF THE LARGE PARTY IS SEEN TO
HAVE SOLD OUT TO AN EXTREMIST
PARTY OR THE SMALL PARTY SOLD
OUT TO THE LARGE PARTY, THEY'RE
GOING TO PAY A PRICE WITH THE
SUPPORTERS.
THERE IS GOING TO BE NEGOTIATING
AND EVERYBODY HAS TO WUT WATER
IN THEIR WINE.
>> Rosemary: YOU WROTE ABOUT
THIS PLAYING OUT IN QUÉBEC.
THE ELECTION IS MONDAY.
THINGS ARE TIGHT BETWEEN THE KRK
AND THE LIBERALS AND PEOPLE ARE
LOOKING AT OTHER PARTIES THEY
MAY NOT HAVE LOOKED AT IN THE
PAST, BECAUSE THEY REALIZE A
REFERENDUM IS NO LONGER IN THE
OFFERING.
I'M GOING TO PUT UP THE POLL
TRACKER.
>> WELL, YES, BUT IT'S A MIX OF
THINGS.
IT'S NOT JUST THERE IS NOT
SOVEREIGNTY AND THEY'RE LOOK AT
OTHER PARTIES, IT'S ALSO CO-- AS
IN NEW BRUNSWICK, THERE ARE MORE
PARTIES ON THE BALLOT.
THE CONSERVATIVES AND THE
LIBERALS AND THEN THE BLOC
QUEBECOIS CAME ALONG AND NOW THE
N.D.P. IS ALSO A PARTY TO RECKON
WITH.
THAT'S HAPPENING PROVINCIALLY,
TOO.
AND FROM WHAT WE SEE IN THIS
ELECTION AT LEAST, AND I SUSPECT
IT PLAYS OUT IN OTHER PROVINCES
WHERE THE GREENS HAVE DONE WELL,
THE MILLENNIALS WHO ARE BECOMING
THE LARGER CORE OF THE
ELECTORATE, FOR SOME REASON HAVE
FIGURED OUT POSSIBLY BETTER THAN
WE DID, THAT TO MAKE A NATIONAL
ASSEMBLY OR PARLIAMENT WORK, YOU
NEED DIVERSITY OF VOICES.
YOU DON'T NEED TO VOTE TO WIN,
YOU VOTE TO HAVE DIFFERENT
VOICES YOU LIKE IN THE
LEGISLATURE AND THE RESULT IS
MORE FRAGMENTED ELECTORATE AND
RESULTS THAT ARE UNPREDICTABLE.
ANDREW DIDN'T NEGLIGENCE THAT,
BUT IN THE -- MENTION THAT, BUT
IN THE CASE OF NEW BRUNSWICK,
THE LIBERALS DID WIN QUITE A FEW
MORE VOTES THAN THE
CONSERVATIVES.
BUT THAT'S AN ADDED TWIST THAT
YOU'VE GOT A PARTY THAT HAS GOT
A LOT MORE VOTES THAT CAME
SECOND IN TERMS OF SEATS.
SO WHEN IT COMES TO CLAIMING
LEGITIMACY, BOTH OF THEM HAVE A
CLAIM.
>> Rosemary: HOW DO YOU THINK
THAT WILL PLAY OUT IN THE
ELECTION ON MONDAY WATCHING FROM
HERE, HOW WILL THAT -- DON'T
PREDICT THE ELECTION, BUT -- HOW
DO YOU THINK THE ISSUES WILL
FACTOR IN?
>> I THINK A LOT OF THE VOTERS
IN QUÉBEC ARE VOTING FOR CHANGE.
SO WHEN THEY'RE LOOKING AT THE
OFFERING, THEY HAVE MORE OPTIONS
TO LOOK AT.
WHAT WE'VE SEEN NATIONALLY AND
IN OTHER PROVINCIAL
LEGISLATURES, EVEN IF YOU'RE A
SMALL PARTY YOU CAN HAVE A
DIFFERENCE AND SOMETIMES YOUR
PARTY CARRIES MORE WEIGHT.
YOU THINK OF ELIZABETH MAY IN
THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, SHE HAS
QUITE A BIT OF WEIGHT AND SHE'S
ONE LONE PERSON AND A LIBERAL
BACK BENCHER WHO MAY NOT ALWAYS
AGREE WITH THE GOVERNMENT AND
KEEPS THEIR MOUTH SHUT.
MILLENNIALS, AND I AM ONE OF
THEM, SOMETIMES THINK MAYBE
HAVING MORE CHOICE IS NOT A BAD
THING AND MAYBE COOPERATION IS A
GOOD THING.
SO I DON'T THINK WE'RE ALLERGIC
TO GIVING PARTIES THE CHANCE TO
WORK TOGETHER.
THINK I THAT'S BASICALLY THE
LESSON IN NEW BRUNSWICK AND IT'S
PROBABLY GOING TO BE THE LESSON
IN QUÉBEC AS WELL.
>> Rosemary: WHAT IS THE LESSON
FOR FEDERAL PARTIES WATCHING
THIS?
MAXIME BERNIER, ELIZABETH MAY,
THESE PEOPLE OFFERING VERY
SPECIFIC LITTLE THINGS MAYBE, OR
BIG THINGS, YOU KNOW WHAT I
MEAN, SMALL PARTIES MIGHT TAKE
COMFORT IN WHAT THEY'RE SEEING?
>> YEAH, WE'RE GETTING A GLIMPSE
OF THE FUTURE.
THERE ARE ALREADY SEVEN PARTIES
REPRESENTED NOW IN THE HOUSE OF
COMMONS.
IF YOU INCLUDE MAXIME BERNIER'S
PEOPLE'S PARTY AND ERIN WEIR
REVIVED.
>> Rosemary: THAT IS GENEROUS OF
YOU.
>> BUT CERTAINLY WE HAVE FIVE.
AND YEAH, TO TAKE UP THAT POINT.
PEOPLE ARE LESS MOORED TO THE
OLD TWO PARTY OR THREE PARTY
SYSTEM.
YOU SEE THE N.D.P. DOING WELL IN
ATLANTIC CANADA IN RECENT YEARS.
YOU'RE SEEING NEW PARTIES LIKE
THE PEOPLE ALLIANCE IN NEW
BRUNSWICK.
AND WE NEED A SYSTEM THAT IS
GOING TO ACCOMMODATE THAT, CAN
MAKE THAT WORK FOR PEOPLE SO WE
DON'T SIT THERE WAITING ON
ELECTION NIGHT FOR THE ACCIDENTS
OF THE SPLIT VOTE.
THAT IS PART OF WHAT MAKES THE
QUÉBEC ELECTION SO
UNPREDICTABLE.
YOU HAVE FOUR PARTY SPLITS.
EVEN IF THE POLLS ARE RIGHT, YOU
DON'T HAVE TO CLEAR IDEA WHAT
THAT MEANS IN THE SEAT COUNT.
WE HAVE A SYSTEM THAT IS ILL
SUITED TO THE POLITICS.
>> LET'S AGREE ON ONE THING.
IF ONE OF THE PARTIES IN QUÉBEC,
IT'S NICE TO HAVE CHOICES, BUT
THE PROBLEM YOU HAVE WITH FOUR
DAYS TO GO, A LOT OF VOTERS
SAYING I DON'T REALLY LIKE ANY
OF THE CHOICES.
NONE OF THE PARTIES HAS MANAGED
TO SAY I'M IT, OR GIVE VOTERS
REASON TO SAY THIS IS WHO WE
WANT, AND THAT EXPLAINS WHY THE
RESULTS MIGHT BE A SLIP IF THEY
WILL BE.
IF YOU HAVE TO SUM UP WHAT
QUÉBECERS WOULD LIKE, IT REMAINS
A MINORITY GOVERNMENT.
THEY WANT TO TRY SOMETHING OUT
WITH A CHANCE TO BRING IT BACK
FOR A REFUND QUICKLY IF THEY
DON'T LIKE IT.
AND THAT TELLS YOU NOBODY HERE
IN THIS PROVINCE HAS RUN A VERY
EXCITING INSPIRING CAMPAIGN TO
TELL YOU THE TRUTH.
>> Rosemary: LAST WORD ON THIS
AND THEN ANOTHER TOPIC.
>> SOUNDS LIKE MY SHOPPING
HABITS.
BUY SOMETHING, BRING IT BACK IF
YOU DON'T LIKE IT.
I THINK THAT -- YOU KNOW, WHEN
YOU LOOK BACK AT WHAT THE PRIME
MINISTER SAID LAST YEAR, TWO
YEARS AGO, WHEN HE RENEGED ON
THE ELECTORAL REFORM, HE SAID
P.R. WAS GOING TO BE BIG AND IT
WAS GOING TO GIVE ELECTORAL MAP
OF FRINGE CANDIDATES AND IT WAS
BETTER TO HAVE BIG TENT PARTIES
THAT BROUGHT THE VOICES.
WHAT WE'RE SEEING IS THE PUBLIC
IS COMFORTABLE HAVING A PIECE OF
PARLIAMENT AND WHILE IT'S TRUE
THAT ON MONDAY THERE MAY NOT BE
A CLEAR WINNER AND IT MIGHT MEAN
THAT THE ROAST OF US ARE
LEARNING A LOT ABOUT HOW WEST
MINISTER GOVERNMENT WORKS AND
WHAT THE NORMS ARE AND
CONSTITUTIONAL PRACTISES, IT'S
NOT NECESSARILY A BAD THING.
I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT
FOR OUR POLITICAL LEADERS TO BE
ACCURATE AND CLEAR WITH THE
ELECTORATE ABOUT HOW THINGS ARE
ACTUALLY SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN.
FOR EXAMPLE, IN NEW BRUNSWICK, I
DON'T KNOW IT'S REALLY HELPFUL
FOR THE P.C. LEADER TO COME OUT
AND SAY THE LIBERAL LEADER DOES
NOT HAVE A MANDATE BECAUSE
THAT'S NOT HOW THE SYSTEM IS
SUPPOSED TO BE PLAY OUT.
LET'S ALL BE GRIPPED TO THE EDGE
OF THE SEATS AND SEE HOW THE
POLITICAL LEADERS DEAL.
>> IT MAY BE THE VOTERS ARE
GETTING MORE SOPHISTICATED.
I WANT TO DO A GO AROUND ON
DONALD TRUMP IN TERMS OF WHAT HE
SAID ABOUT CANADA'S NEGOTIATING
TACTICS.
DURING THE EPIC PRESS
CONFERENCE, HERE'S A REMINDER.
>> FRANKLY WE'RE THINKING ABOUT
JUST TAXING CARS COMING IN FROM
CANADA, THAT'S THE MOTHER LODE,
THAT'S THE BIG ONE.
WE'RE VERY UNHAPPY WITH THE
NEGOTIATIONS AND THE NEGOTIATING
STYLE OF CANADA.
WE DON'T LIKE THEIR
REPRESENTATIVE VERY MUCH.
>> Rosemary: ONE GO ROUND ON
THAT, BECAUSE IT WAS I GUESS IT
IS PART OF HOW HE NEGOTIATES AS
WE COME UP TO THIS DEADLINE THAT
CHANTAL DOESN'T LIKE ME TO CALL
A DEADLINE, BUT THE THING ON
SUNDAY THAT EVERYONE IS CALLING
DEADLINE.
DOES WHAT HE DID THERE YESTERDAY
CHANGE ANYTHING FOR CANADIANS IN
TERMS OF THEIR HOPES ABOUT
GETTING A DEAL HERE?
>> WELL, ONE, IF THE HOPE WAS TO
HAVE SOME CANADIAN PRESSURE
POLITICAL AT LEAST PUT ON
TRUDEAU, THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
I WOULD ARGUE THAT A FEW MORE
NEWS CONFERENCE LIKE THAT THEN
JUSTIN TRUDEAU WILL WANT TO CALL
AN ELECTION ON IT, BECAUSE EVERY
TIME THAT HAPPENS OVER THAT
PRESS CONFERENCE WHICH WAS
SURREAL, MORE PEOPLE ARE GOING
TO BE LOOKING AT DONALD TRUMP
AND SAYING, WELL, IF WE CAN'T
GET A DEAL WITH THIS GUY, IT'S
NOT OUR GUY'S FAULT.
>> YEAH, WHEN YOU PERSONALIZE IT
THAT WAY, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO
MAKE YARDS IN CANADIAN PUBLIC
OPINION.
LOOK, LOTS OF PEOPLE IN CANADA
FIND THIS GOVERNMENT ANNOYING.
BUT WHEN DONALD TRUMP SAYS IT, I
THINK PEOPLE TEND TO TAKE THE
SIDE OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT
RATHER THAN TRUMP.
I DON'T KNOW IT'S GOING TO HAVE
MUCH IMPACT.
I DON'T KNOW IF HE HAD INTENT OR
IF HE WAS RRIFFING.
>> IT WAS A LITTLE STREAM OF
CONSCIOUSNESS.
>> I THINK HIS INTENT WAS TO SAY
TO THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT I'M
READY TO IMPOSE AUTO TARIFFS.
I THINK WHAT ALSO HAPPENED
YESTERDAY WAS THAT WE SAW DAVID
MacNAUGHTON, OUR AMBASSADOR TO
THE UNITED STATES SAY VERY
CLEARLY WHAT IS AT STAKE AND WHY
CANADA IS NOT BUDGING.
THE IDEA WE SIGN AN AGREEMENT
BUT ALLOW THE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES TO CLAIM A NATURAL
LOOPHOLE, THAT CAN'T HAPPEN IF
WE SIGN A DEAL ON NAFTA.
A LOT OF PEOPLE WILL BE BACKING
THE GOVERNMENT ON THAT ONE.
>> Rosemary: WHICH I THINK IS
THE CONSERVATIVES' WORST
NIGHTMARE, THIS IS GOING TO BE
AN ELECTION WHERE IT'S TRUMP
VERSUS TRUDEAU AND THEN WHAT
HAPPENS.
>> EASY TO IMAGINE.
>> Rosemary: WE'RE GOING TO
LEAVE IT THERE.
THANKS, EVERYBODY.
BEFORE WE GO, SUBSCRIBE TO THE
"AT ISSUE" PODCAST EDITION.
HOW THE CONSERVATIVES ARE USING
CRIME AS A WEDGE ISSUE.
>> Andrew: STILL LOTS MORE TO
COMMON OTT "NATIONAL", INCLUDING
A RAUCOUS DAY OUTSIDE OF A
COURTHOUSE AS PEOPLE RALLIED IN
SUPPORT OF TOMMY ROBINSON.
>> SPOKE THE TRUTH.
>> THIS IS THE FAR RIGHT,
ANTI-MUSLIM ACTIVIST WITH A
HISTORY OF VIOLENCE WHO WAS SENT
TO PRISON FOR BREAKING THE LAW.
>> Andrew: TOMORROW NIGHT ON
"THE NATIONAL", IT'S BEEN A WEEK
SINCE THE OTTAWA-GATINEAU AREA
WAS HIT BY SIX TORNADOES.
WE'LL SHOW YOU HOW PEOPLE ARE
DEALING WITH THE DAMAGE LEFT
BEHIND AND THE CLEANUP AHEAD.
>> VERY VIOLENT.
YOU OK?
>> THIS IS THE MAIN DAMAGED ROOM
WHERE THE TREE CAME IN.
>> HOLY --
>> I HAVE MY AMAZING KIDS AND
HUSBAND AND FRIENDS.
NATIONAL", A NEW CORONER REPORT
IN B.C. LOOKING AT 900 DRUG
OVERDOSE DEATHS LAST YEAR AND
THE YEAR BEFORE.
IT FOUND MOST OF THOSE HAPPENED
NOT ON THE STREET, BUT WHILE
PEOPLE WERE ALONE AT HOME.
A VAST MAJORITY OF THE VICTIMS,
81% OF THEM, WERE MALE.
DRUG OVERDOSES ARE STILL CAUSING
MORE THAN THREE DEATHS A DAY IN
B.C.
>> AT THE TIME YOU MADE THESE
STATEMENTS, COULD NOT SECURE
FUNDING FOR THE PROPOSED
TRANSACTION.
>> THAT'S THE SEC ANNOUNCING
TODAY IT'S SUING ELON MUSK.
THE LAWSUIT CENTRES ON TWEETS
WHERE HE CLAIMED A SECURE
FUNDING TO TAKE TESLA PRIVATE.
MUSK CALLED THE ACTION
UNJUSTIFIED.
>> WE'RE KEEPING AN EYE ON A
POWERFUL SLOW MOVING TYPHOON
HEADING TOWARD JAPAN.
IT'S TRACKING ACROSS THE PACIFIC
TOWARD THE SOUTHWESTERN ISLAND.
FORECASTERS SAY IT WILL LIKELY
HIT IN THE NEXT DAY OR SO AND
WHEN IT DOES, PEOPLE HAVE BEEN
WARNED TO EXPECT DESTRUCTIVE
WINDS AND HEAVY RAIN.
>>> WELL, IT WAS A CHAOTIC SCENE
OUTSIDE A LONDON COURTHOUSE AS
HUNDREDS OF SUPPORTERS AND
COUNTERPROTESTERS GREETED THE
MAN KNOWN AS TOMMY ROBINSON.
THE 35-YEAR-OLD APPEARED BEFORE
A JUDGE ON CONTEMPT OF COURT
RELATED TO AN INCIDENT IN MAY.
ROBINSON HAS GARNERED A GLOBAL
AUDIENCE ONLINE, PRESENTING
HIMSELF AS A FREE SPEECH
ACTIVIST, BUT CONSIDERED AN
ANTI-I SEE ISLAM AGITATOR.
THOMAS DAIGLE HAS MORE.
>> Reporter: HIS NAME RALLIES
THOSE WITH LIKE MINDED VIEWS.
AN ARMY SO PASSIONATE ABOUT HIS
CAUSE, THEY SHOW UP OUTSIDE THE
COURTHOUSE WHEN HE'S INSIDE.
>> SPEAK THE TRUTH, ABOUT -- YOU
KNOW WHAT ABOUT.
ISLAM, SHARIA LAW.
>> Reporter: HE FANCIES HIMSELF
A JOURNALIST WITH PROVOCATIVE
STATEMENTS.
>> WE HAVE TO STOP ISLAM.
>> A Facebook LIVE STREAM
ULTIMATELY GOT HIM ARRESTED
REPORTING IN HIS OWN WAY OUTSIDE
A TRIAL WITH A PUBLICATION BAN.
AUTHORITIES CONSIDERED IT
CONTEMPT OF COURT.
>> THIS IS A FAR RIGHT
ANTI-MUSLIM CRIMINAL.
>> LOOK AT HOW ROBINSON FIRST
BECAME KNOWN A DECADE AGO BY
LEADING CHAOTIC RALLIES WITH THE
ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE.
A GROUP PROMOTING BRITISH VALUES
OVER WHAT IT CONSIDERED CREEPING
SHARIA LAW.
>> LOOK AROUND YOU, FEEL YOUR
STRENGTH.
>> Reporter: AMONG HIS FOLLOWERS
BACK THEN WAS IVAN HUMBLE, HE
NOW REJECTS THE GROUP, BUT KEEPS
THE TATTOO AS A REMINDER OF HOW
ENTHRALLED HE BECAME.
>> THERE WAS NOBODY LISTENING TO
ME AND I FOUND A VOICE IN THE
ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE TO
SELF-BLAME, UNCONSCIOUSLY, YOU
DON'T REALIZE.
BECAUSE YOU READ THE SAME STUFF.
YOU DON'T REALIZE IT'S AFFECTING
IN YOUR HEAD.
>> Reporter: IT'S THE FIRST TIME
HE RETURNS TO THE TOWN HALL
SINCE THE GROUP WAS BANNED HERE
IN THE HEART OF ROBINSON'S HOME
TOWN.
HIS OLD STOMPS GROUNDS, ROBINSON
CHANNELLED FIERCE OF ISLAM AS A
THREAT TO LOCAL CULTURE.
THEN TURNING TO SOCIAL MEDIA,
ROBINSON GAINED AN OVERSEAS
AUDIENCE AND A BIG BOOST FROM
CANADA.
>> WHAT HE SAYS IS CLEAR AND
PHILOSOPHICAL.
>> Reporter: LIKE MINDED FIRE
BRAND EZRA LEVANT OFFERED
ROBINSON A PLATFORM ON HIS
ALTERNATIVE NETWORK, REBEL
MEDIA.
RACKING UP MILLIONS OF VIEWS
WITH STUNTS LIKE THIS.
>> YOU'RE SCUM, YOU'RE DEFENDING
CHILD RAPISTS.
>> Reporter: ANTAGONIZING THE
ACCUSED AND THEIR FAMILIES
OUTSIDE RAPE TRIALS.
>> EXPOSE PEOPLE LIKE YOU.
>> Reporter: AND BLAMING ISLAM
AS THE SOURCE OF THE CRIME.
>> INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT THE
INDIVIDUALS THAT PERPETRATE THE
CRIMES, HE CALLS WHOLE OF OF THE
MUSLIM COMMUNITY AND ISLAM
RESPONSIBLE.
>> HIS SUPPORTERS SAW HIS ARREST
AS AN ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH.
THEY MARCHED IN HIS DEFENCE,
MANY LIKELY UNAWARE THE
DEMONSTRATION WAS PARTLY FUNDED
BY A THINK TANK AN OCEAN AWAY.
>> HOW DO YOU SPEND MONEY THAT
GOES TO SUPPORT, GIVE AIR,
OXYGEN TO THESE COMMENTS?
>> SO, IT'S NOT ABOUT THE OXYGEN
TO THE COMMENTS, IT'S ABOUT HIS
RIGHT TO SAY IT.
IT'S IMPORTANT FOR AN AMERICAN
ORGANIZATION TO STAND UP FOR
SOMEONE TALKING ABOUT THE THREAT
OF ISLAMISM AND IT'S OCCURRING
HERE IN THE UNITED STATES.
>> Reporter: RELEASED FROM
PRISON ON AUGUST 1, ROBINSON
GAVE FEW INTERVIEWS.
BUT A PRIME TIME SPOT ON FOX
NEWS CONFIRMED HIS AUDIENCE HAD
REACHED GLOBAL PROPORTIONS.
>> THE MINUTE YOU CRITICIZE
ISLAM YOU'RE ATTACKED BY
EVERYBODY.
>> Reporter: AS HIS RETRIAL GOT
UNDER WAY TODAY AND THREAT OF
PRISON TIME LOOMS, HIS
SUPPORTERS SHOWED THEY'LL HAVE
HIS BACK.
AND WHEN HE SPEAKS HIS MIND,
THEY'LL LISTEN.
THOMAS DAIGLE, CBC NEWS, LONDON.
>> Rosemary: MOMENT OF THE DAY
IS NEXT.
WE'LL HEAR FROM THE PEOPLE WHO
TUNED INTO THE FORD-KAVANAUGH
HEARING.
SOME WERE IN CLASS, DOCTORS'
OFFICE OR MID FLIGHT.
>> FOR ME, PERSONALLY, IT'S BEEN
VERY HARD TO WATCH, VERY
DIFFICULT TO SEE SOMEONE
STRUGGLE WITH WHAT IS VERY
>> Hi, I need the, uh...
>> Yeah, that way, yep.
>> Okay.
[loud footsteps]
>> Yeah. Out of my way.
*
>> Rosemary: AMERICANS OFTEN GET
CAUGHT UP WATCHING WASHINGTON'S
MANY DRAMAS.
TODAY WAS A REMARKABLE DAY, ONE
THAT SEEMED TO HAVE EVERYONE
REALLY TRANSFIXED.
SOME VIEWED BRETT KAVANAUGH'S
NOMINATION HEARING A TONE DEAF
RESPONSE TO A BIGGER ISSUE OF
SEXUAL MISCONDUCT.
FEW AMERICANS MISSED IT.
WHERE, HOW AND WHY THEY WATCHED
IT IS TONIGHT'S "MOMENT."
>> I WATCHED THE HEARINGS TODAY
NOT IN MINNEAPOLIS, THOUGH.
I WAS ACTUALLY AT 37,000 FEET.
I SAW THE FIRST HEARING ON MY
HAWAII TO SEATTLE FLIGHT.
AND THE SECOND HEARING FROM
SEATTLE TO MINNEAPOLIS.
>> I THINK THE WORLD IS
WATCHING, OUR KIDS ARE WATCHING,
GIRLS AND BOYS.
>> I WATCHED IT ON MY iPad IN
THE CAR, ON MY PHONE IN THE
RESTAURANT.
WHEN I DIDN'T HAVE INTERNET
SERVICE, I LISTENED TO IT ALL
DAY LONG.
EVERYWHERE I WENT TODAY,
EVERYBODY WAS TALKING ABOUT IT.
PEOPLE INSIDE THE RESTAURANT
KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON.
EVERYBODY WAS JUST WATCHING.
>> I WATCHED KAVANAUGH'S
TESTIMONY.
>> IT WAS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT
I CATCH THE ENTIRE EVENTS OF
TODAY.
I FEEL STRONGLY THAT WE HAVE A
TERRIBLE SEXUAL VIOLENCE PROBLEM
HERE IN THE UNITED STATES.
>> I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT
TO WATCH THIS HEARING AND PAY
ATTENTION TO THIS, BECAUSE IF
CONFIRMED, KAVANAUGH COULD
IMPACT OUR RIGHTS AND OUR DAILY
LIVES.
>> Andrew: ROSIE, I, LIKE YOU,
I'M SURE, WAS GLUED TO THE
HEARINGS ALL DAY.
I WONDER, THOUGH, NOT A GREAT
SURPRISE, PERHAPS THE GREAT
DISAPPOINTMENT, MAYBE, THE LACK
OF ANY DEFINITIVE CONCLUSION OR
CONSENSUS OUT OF THIS
POLITICALLY OR CULTURALLY IF
WE'RE IN A DIFFERENT PLACE NOW
THAN WE WERE WHEN THE DAY
STARTED.
I DON'T KNOW.
>> Rosemary: YEAH, I MEAN,
BECAUSE IT DID COME DOWN TO HE
SAID-SHE SAID DAY AND YOU CAN
DECIDE WHAT YOU BELIEVE.
"TIME" IS REPORTING THAT THE
NATIONAL SEXUAL ASSAULT HOTLINE
SAW A SPIKE OF 147% CALLS ON
THURSDAY.
IF IT JUST GETS PEOPLE TALKING
ABOUT THE ISSUE, MAYBE IT'S
MOVED THE DIAL AND MOVED THINGS
A LITTLE BIT IN THAT DIRECTION.
OK.
THAT'S "THE NATIONAL" FOR
SEPTEMBER 27.
GOOD NIGHT.
>> Andrew: GOOD NIGHT.
-------------------------------------------
Former US Attorney Guy Lewis Breaks Down Kavanaugh Senate Judiciary Hearings - Duration: 7:03.
-------------------------------------------
Manuel Favilla & Natalia Maidiuk I United States Dance Championships 2018 I Cha Cha - Duration: 1:30.
subscribe now
dancesport
ballroom
latin dance
panache star video
cha cha
subscribe now
-------------------------------------------
Music Modernization Act passes U.S. House - Duration: 0:23.
-------------------------------------------
Gilbert teen is the next U.S. Olympics hopeful - Duration: 2:10.
-------------------------------------------
U.S. Supreme Court nominee angrily denies allegations of sexual assault - Duration: 1:12.
U.S. President Donald Trump's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court has angrily and tearfully
denied allegations of sexual assault.
Brett Kavanaugh said the claims made by university professor Christine Blasey Ford were false,
adding his confirmation process had become a "national disgrace".
"This whole two week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with
apparent pent up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election…...
This grotesque and coordinated character assassination will dissuade confident and good people of
all political persuasions from serving our country….."
Ford testified during Thursday's hearing that she was "100 percent" certain that Kavanaugh
was the one who sexually assaulted her during high school.
Kavanaugh was careful not to denounce Ford, saying he didn't doubt the professor may have
been sexually assaulted by someone in some place at some time, but he insisted he had
never assaulted her or anyone.
-------------------------------------------
WTO downgrades growth forecast amid U.S.-China trade war - Duration: 0:39.
The World Trade Organization says world trade growth is likely to be slower than previously
thought in 2018 and 2019.... amid the ongoing trade war between the U.S. and China.
According to the latest forecast by the WTO,... the world trade in goods will grow by three-point-nine
percent this year,... less than the four-point-four percent it forecast in April.
Trade growth of three-point-seven percent is expected for 2019,... down from its previous
forecast of 4-percent.
WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo (Az-eh-vay-do) says while trade growth remains strong,...
the downgrade reflects the heightened tensions between the U.S. and China.
-------------------------------------------
At UN Security Council, U.S. at odds with China, Russia over N. Korea sanctions - Duration: 2:37.
UN Security Council members met to discuss the positive developments in negotiations
between Pyeongyang and Washington.
There was tension between the U.S.... and North Korea's two allies.
China and Russia believe there should be changes to sanctions on the regime.
Oh Jung-hee has the details.
The 15 member nations of the UN Security Council gathered Thursday on the sidelines of the
UN General Assembly... to discuss North Korea.
The meeting came after U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accepted North Korean leader Kim
Jong-un's invitation to Pyeongyang... and after President Trump revealed that he received
another letter from Kim.
Against that backdrop, it was a standoff between the U.S. and North Korea's neighbors China
and Russia... over sanctions.
Secretary Pompeo said they'll have to stay in place until North Korea denuclearizes,
and he credited the sanctions for the progress made up 'til now.
"We must not forget what's brought us this far - the historic, international pressure
campaign that this council has made possible through the sanctions that it imposed.
Enforcement of U.N. Security Council sanctions must continue vigorously and without fail
until we realize the fully, final, verified de-nuclearization."
China and Russia, on the other hand, said the sanctions need to be eased.
China's foreign minister Wang Yi pointed out that one of the Security Council provisions
allows sanctions to be modified if Pyeongyang is found to be complying with them.
"Given the positive developments, China believes that the Security Council needs to consider
invoking in due course this provision to encourage North Korea and other relevant parties to
move denuclearization further ahead."
And Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said...
sanctions can't become an "instrument of collective punishment."
"I would just like to remind you that any negotiations are a two-way street.
North Korea's actions towards gradual disarmament should be followed by easing of sanctions.
There should be reaction towards every action."
North Korea promised it will invite international experts when it dismantles its missile engine
test site... and hinted it could get rid of its key nuclear complex once the U.S. takes
corresponding measures.
But differences remain between the U.S. and the two allies of the North over what comes
next -- Washington in favor of dialogue and sanctions -- Beijing and Moscow calling for
rewards as the process goes forward.
Oh Jung-hee, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
U.S. Fed raises benchmark interest rate on strong economy - Duration: 2:15.
Policymakers at the U.S. Fed decided to hike interest rates for the third time this year.
Now there's added pressure on Korea's central bank to lift its own key rates... as the rate
gap between the two countries has widened to the highest level since 2007.
Kim Hyesung explains further.
In a unanimous move Wednesday, the U.S. Federal Reserve raised its benchmark federal funds
rate by a quarter percentage point to a range of two to two-and-a quarter percent... in
the Fed's eighth rate hike since 2015.
"This action reflects the strength we see in the economy and is one more step in the
process that we began almost three years ago of gradually returning interest rates to more
normal levels."
The Fed forecasts the U.S. economy will grow three-point-one percent this year,... faster
than the two-point-eight percent projection back in June,... adding it will continue to
expand moderately for at least three more years.
With the latest increase, the rate gap between Korea and the U.S. has widened to 75 basis
points.
Finance Minsiter Kim Dong-yeon and Bank of Korea governor Lee Ju-yeol said Thursday that
the Fed's rate hike will likely have a limited impact on Korea's capital markets,...saying
the pace of rate normalization is in line with expectations.
Korea's capital market has stayed relatively stable even after the Fed's rate hike in March
that made the U.S. rate higher than Korea's for the first time in a decade, but the capital
market risk is growing.
"Korea has strong economic fundamentals, like its current account surplus and record high
FX reserves.
But with the rate gap continuing to widen as the U.S. tightens its monetary policy,
it could result in volatilty in emerging markets, and cause capital flight from Korea... as
investors look for safer assets like U.S. bonds with higher yields."
Since November 2017, the BOK has kept its key rate at one-point-five percent, citing
sluggish job figures and concerns over the U.S.-China trade spat.
But with the Fed signaling another rate hike in December, the pressure is growing on the
BOK to lift its key rate in one of its last two meetings this year, in October and November.
Kim Hyesung, Arirang News.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét