Auto news on Youtube May 2 2018

BREAKING News Out Of California…

This Is NOT Good A California maniac who pleaded not guilty

after being accused of waterboarding and torturing his wife earlier this year could be looking

at life in prison.

Richard David Schlosser, 36, of Newport Beach, was hit with a slew of charges in January,

including torture, and criminal threats, after allegedly attacking his 65-year-old wife,

the Los Angeles Times reported Monday.

Schlosser "kept her captive in the apartment for hours," Senior Deputy District Attorney

Mark Geller told Southern California's City News Service.

"He actually waterboarded her."

Geller said the 36-year-old held his wife inside their home in January while under the

influence of drugs and alcohol, City News Service reported.

After Schlosser reportedly "sobered up," the woman, who has not been publicly identified,

was able to contact a friend, who called police.

She was reportedly hospitalized to be treated for her injuries, Fox News reported.In a restraining

order request, that was later dismissed due to the her failure to appear in court, the

woman claimed Schlosser attacked her for six hours from Jan. 5 until Jan. 6, the Times

reported.

She alleged he "punched her — leaving her with a black eye — kicked her, hit her

with a candelabra and cut her with scissors," according to the newspaper.

Court documents reportedly state that Schlosser allegedly choked the woman and shoved a towel

down her throat.

He also faces possible sentencing enhancements on allegations of causing great bodily injury

and committing an offense while released from custody.

At the time of the incident, Schlosser was out of jail on $50,000 bail in connection

with a separate domestic violence case in Riverside County from December 2016.

He has pleaded not guilty to felony charges in that case, court records show.

Schlosser, who's scheduled to appear in court in August for a pretrial hearing, has

reportedly pleaded not guilty to one count each of torture, corporal injury on a spouse,

false imprisonment and criminal threats.

He could face up to life in prison if convicted.

For more infomation >> BREAKING News Out Of California… This Is NOT Good - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

VIRAL News Out Of California… You Will LOVE This! - Duration: 2:45.

For more infomation >> VIRAL News Out Of California… You Will LOVE This! - Duration: 2:45.

-------------------------------------------

California is Staring Down Another 2016 - Duration: 5:42.

Hi, everyone. Alison Hartson here, running for United States Senate in California.

I want to update you about an article that just came out regarding a poll that

was just released with some pretty surprising results regarding this race

in particular. And what this can mean for our state and what it can mean for our

country is pretty dangerous. So there is a person who has risen out of nowhere,

out of left field. And, according to this poll, would win second place on June 5th

for the primary. And if you remember we have a top-two system, so really you

need first and second place and then those two people go on to the general

election. So this person who has risen in the polling -- we know that we can't

necessarily trust polls -- but it is still good to follow them to see if they're an

indication of anything. Well, this guy if if this poll is in fact an indication,

what this means is that we're going to wind up with another 2016, where our two

options, the lesser of two evils, will be between a corporatist and a white

supremacist. Let me tell you about Patrick Little. Patrick Little is running

as a Republican, and that is extremely dangerous of course because people vote

down ballot. You know, most people really do vote based on party, their party being

Democrat or largely their party being Republican, and they vote based on the

names they recognize. Most people are not voting based on policy. Most people are

not voting based on a person's record, their experience, their character what

they bring to this particular race and what they will in office. So it's no

surprise that this guy Patrick Little would be rising in the polls just

because people are like "I'm just gonna vote for a Republican." And that's why we

have to make sure that people know about this guy. Because the Republicans I know

here in California would never support someone like this. He is a white

supremacist through-and-through. A straight-up neo-Nazi.

This guy has said that he believes Jews should have no say over white non-Jews.

He supports a neo-Nazi website. He believes that Jewish people should be

removed from our country. This neo-Nazi website in particular advocates for

violence against Jews, and their kids, and their families, if they do not leave the

country and if they do not stand down against white supremacy. And the violence

that they specifically have mentioned includes murder. The murder of these

people and their families. This is this is no joke, people. This is really serious.

The votes, the elections that are coming up, really are a fight for our lives. A

fight for our future. And we have to make sure Democrats and Republicans and

Independents all across the board are very well aware of this.

He's also, this guy Little, is also a fan of Christopher Cantwell. If you're not sure

who he is, he's kind of risen in popularity as a neo-Nazi. And he, in fact,

actually was interviewed and commented on this race in regards to

Little. Let me read you a quote that he said. He says, "I have my doubts that

Holocaust revisionism polls well among Californians of any party." Therefore he

doesn't believe that Little has a chance. In other words, if California Republicans

were supportive of having another holocaust, then maybe Little would

actually win. Because Little is advocating for that, and so is Cantwell,

and neo-Nazis, and white supremacists at-large. So this guy is running for office,

rising in the polls, and could very well win on June 5th, unless we get out and

vote. This is no joking matter. We have to hit the streets. We have one month left.

And this is the time when people are paying attention to elections. So there's

a lot of good news to be had here that if we just get out there,

knock on doors and make phone calls. How do you do it? Get involved. Sign up for my

campaign. Take action. Do something every single day for just the one month that

we have left. But really, truly, if we don't want another 2016, if we are sick

and tired of having the lesser of two evils, if we don't want to wind up

with having to vote between a corporatist and a white supremacist, we

have got to spread the word and we have got to get out that vote. Like our life

depends on it. This is our chance for redemption, everybody. This is our chance

to get it right. We finally have people all across the country.

Look at the Justice Democrats slate. Look at the Brand New Congress slate.

We finally have people we can vote for. We finally have some real, true

options. Some real hope. But we also have, at the same time, the extreme opposite

of that. And so we have to get involved and take this back and do every single thing

we can. Go to my website: AlisonHartson.com. Sign up to volunteer and follow

through. Again, let's take it back, let's have some redemption, and let's get it

right this time.

For more infomation >> California is Staring Down Another 2016 - Duration: 5:42.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING News Out Of California… This Is NOT Good - Duration: 2:38.

For more infomation >> BREAKING News Out Of California… This Is NOT Good - Duration: 2:38.

-------------------------------------------

California Among 17 States Suing EPA Over Plan To Scrap Car Emission Standards - Duration: 2:24.

For more infomation >> California Among 17 States Suing EPA Over Plan To Scrap Car Emission Standards - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS Out Of California… IT'S HAPPENING NOW!!! - Duration: 2:20.

BREAKING NEWS Out Of California…

IT'S HAPPENING NOW!!!

The world's largest active geyser has erupted three times in the past six weeks at Yellowstone

National Park, including once this week, in a pattern that is highly unusual, according

to geologists.

And scientists cannot explain what is causing the geyser to erupt.

One thing all scientists can agree on is that, as they've repeatedly told us before, the

supervolcano churning below the serene scenery in Wyoming is not going to erupt anytime soon.

We shouldn't be taking any of the anomalies to mean as much either.According to Reuters,

the Steamboat Geyser, which can shoot water as high as 300 feet (91 meters) into the air,

erupted on March 15, April 19 and on Friday.

The last time it erupted three times in a year was in 2003, the U.S. Geological Survey's

Yellowstone Volcano Observatory said.

The last time it erupted prior to March was more than three years ago in September 2014.

As always, there's nothing to worry about.

"There is nothing to indicate that any sort of volcanic eruption is imminent," Michael

Poland, the scientist in charge for the observatory, said in an email.

This year's eruptions have been smaller than a usual Steamboat eruption, but the two

in April were about 10 times larger than an eruption at the park's famed Old Faithful

Geyser in terms on the amount of water discharged, he said.

Geologists have not pinpointed a reason for the latest series of eruptions, but say they

could indicate a thermal disturbance in the geyser basin, or that Steamboat may be having

smaller eruptions instead of one large.

–Since most geysers do not erupt on a regular schedule, "it might just reflect the randomness

of geysers," Poland said.

While the Steamboat eruptions are unusual, what would be far more worrying would be the

water in the hydrothermal systems drying up, which could indicate that the super hot magma

deep below was making its way to the surface -and an eruption could occur.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS Out Of California… IT'S HAPPENING NOW!!! - Duration: 2:20.

-------------------------------------------

Olympian sues California over tough ammo laws - Duration: 5:47.

For more infomation >> Olympian sues California over tough ammo laws - Duration: 5:47.

-------------------------------------------

Independent Contractors Catch A Break In California - Duration: 2:15.

For more infomation >> Independent Contractors Catch A Break In California - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

California residents approve state's sanctuary law: poll - Duration: 3:11.

For more infomation >> California residents approve state's sanctuary law: poll - Duration: 3:11.

-------------------------------------------

California files lawsuit over plan to scrap car emission standards - Duration: 1:31.

For more infomation >> California files lawsuit over plan to scrap car emission standards - Duration: 1:31.

-------------------------------------------

Swarm Of Earthquakes Hit Off Southern California Coast - Duration: 0:34.

For more infomation >> Swarm Of Earthquakes Hit Off Southern California Coast - Duration: 0:34.

-------------------------------------------

California files lawsuit against the EPA - Duration: 0:39.

California — with more than a dozen states and the District of Columbia — is suing

the Environmental Protection Agency over its plan to scrap an Obama-era policy that set

fuel-efficiency goals for vehicles.

California Gov. Jerry Brown and Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced the lawsuit Tuesday.

The suit targets the EPA's efforts to roll back fuel-economy standards for vehicles made

between 2022 and 2025.

Becerra said in a statement

For more infomation >> California files lawsuit against the EPA - Duration: 0:39.

-------------------------------------------

California Announces Lawsuit With 16 Other States To Preserve Emissions Standards - Duration: 1:44.

For more infomation >> California Announces Lawsuit With 16 Other States To Preserve Emissions Standards - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

California bill would require online retailers to verify ages - Duration: 1:59.

For more infomation >> California bill would require online retailers to verify ages - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

University of California President Janet Napolitano stops by Cuesta College Monday afternoon - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> University of California President Janet Napolitano stops by Cuesta College Monday afternoon - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

Why Didn't The Police Ticket The Other Driver? – California Injury Attorney Frank Nunes explains - Duration: 3:41.

You were just injured in a car crash where the other driver clearly ran the red light,

but was speeding.

Why didn't that driver get a ticket from the officer when they arrived?

Hi.

I'm Frank Nunes.

I'm a California personal injury trial attorney practicing in the state of California.

Join me as we answer that question.

So many times, clients come to my office and they say, "I know the other driver ran the

red light.

I know he or she was speeding.

I know they made an improper turn, but the officer didn't give them a citation," and

that frustrates them to no end.

Why does that happen?

Well, in California, most often the law requires that the officer observe the crime committed

in his or her presence, particularly in traffic cases when the violation such as running a

red light, speeding, or make an improper left turn is an infraction.

It must be committed in the officer's presence under the criminal standards in order for

that conviction to hold up in the criminal traffic courts.

That's why a lot of times when the officer gets there, the cars have already been in

their places of rest after the collision.

One party says the other party ran the red light.

The other party may admit it or may dispute it, but the officer looks at it and says,

"Well, I didn't see either party run the red light, so I can't issue a citation for it."

Even if a citation is issued, it isn't always the end-all, be-all.

While the issuance of a citation to a driver can give rise to a presumption of negligence

in California, it's not necessarily required to proceed with a civil case against the careless

driver.

On the other hand, certain offenses are more serious if they rise to the level above an

infraction, which is a misdemeanor, which typically in California is a crime or offense

punishable by up to one year in jail.

Then, the officer does not necessarily have to see it committed in his or her presence

to issue a citation.

The most common example of this is a crash caused by an impaired driver.

The officer will arrive at the scene, take statements from the parties, form a reasonable

suspicion that one of the drivers involved may or may not have been impaired and then

begin to question and investigate that potentially impaired driver to a higher level to determine

if, in fact, that person was impaired at the time of the collision.

In those situations, the officer will arrest that person for driving under the influence

if there is probable cause to do so.

Felonies, the largest, most serious offense in California, crimes that are punishable

by over a year, those can be arrested whether or not committed in the officer's presence.

Well, that's it for a brief overview of why the officer didn't cite the at-fault driver.

By the way, if you found today's information helpful, subscriber to our YouTube channel.

Why?

So you can continue to get great new content every time we publish another great educational

video.

If you have questions, I want you to pick up the phone and call me.

I can answer your questions.

I answer questions like this every day.

You can reach me at 559-436-0850.

I'm Frank Nunes, and thanks for watching.