Thứ Sáu, 18 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 18 2018

The number of babies born in the U.S. fell to a 30-year low last year.

According to a provisional report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,

there were about 3.85 million births in the U.S. in 2017.

That's down 2 percent from 2016 and the lowest number recorded since 1978.

Why?

Experts aren't exactly sure.

But the drop could be the result of more women waiting longer to have children.

The CDC's report found the birth rate decreased for women between the ages of 15 and 39, but

increased for women aged 40 to 44.

The report showed teen pregnancy rates are also on the decline.

The total fertility rate in the U.S. in 2017 was once again below the level at which a

generation can replace itself.

But, as The New York Times notes, lower birth numbers haven't led to a lower population

in the past because they've been offset by immigration.

For more infomation >> Number of US babies born dropped to 30-year low - Duration: 0:57.

-------------------------------------------

US Senate Passes Bill to Preserve Net Neutrality Rules - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> US Senate Passes Bill to Preserve Net Neutrality Rules - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

Ex United States Attorney Drops Bombshell Obama CIA Chief Pushed Operation to Frame Donald Trump - Duration: 10:54.

Ex-United States Attorney Drops Bombshell Obama CIA Chief Pushed Operation to Frame

Donald Trump

Kirsters Baish|

Recently, we have been watching as the leftist Trump/Russia collusion narrative unfolds right

before our eyes.

This ridiculous narrative was the match that fueled the fire for special counsel Robert

Mueller's investigation.

Even after a year-long investigation into the allegations that Donald Trump had colluded

with the Russians during the 2016 presidential election, there has been "no credible evidence"

of such actions.

Any "evidence" that the special counsel has come up with, such as the falsified dossier,

has been thrown out.

During an appearance on Fox News this past Tuesday, former United States Attorney General

Joe diGenova touched on the lack of evidence.

DiGenova appeared on Laura Ingraham's "The Ingraham Angle," blaming former Obama administration

CIA Director John Brennan, and claiming that the whole thing was a set up in order to frame

Trump.

DiGenova explained, "It was abundantly clear that there was no legitimate basis even for

a counter intelligence investigation, let alone a criminal investigation.

It is quite obvious that John Brennan was at the head of the group of people who were

going to create a counter intelligence investigation against Trump by creating false information

that was going to be fed through Carter Page, and fed through George Papadopoulos so that

it would be picked up, reported back to Washington and provide the basis for a counter, a fake,

counter intelligence investigation.

And it was all Brennan's doing.

And that is why the Justice Department is viciously fighting revealing everything they

can about the source in London, who everybody knows the identity of."

Laura then asked the diGenova to expand on new reports on an unnamed source from London.

This source allegedly gave up the information that was used to launch the investigation

into Trump.

the former U.S. Attorney General explained, "The source in London was another person

who was feeding false information to George Papadopoulos and others about collusion which

did not exist."

As you saw in the video, former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell also appeared on the show.

She talked about a different aspect of the beginning of the collusion narrative and the

Clinton Foundation/DNC funded dossier.

Western Journal reported on Powell's comments:

She noted how the FBI had granted access to a handful of private contractors, likely to

include Fusion GPS, to sift through raw intelligence gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance

Act.

This was then passed on to Steele and others and recycled back to the U.S. intelligence

community with a false air of legitimacy to help form the narrative used as the basis

for the investigation into Trump.

DiGenova picked up on what Powell had mentioned and pointed out that there had been two opinions

issued by the FISA court in opposition to that illegal practice of allowing private

contractors access to the sensitive raw intelligence data.

DiGenova stated, "All of that was designed for the unmasking and the leaking of the names,

and that was all done by private contractors.

The FISA court objected to it and it never stopped."

Brennan has made it clear in the past that he is not a fan of President Trump, so it

isn't hard to see where diGenova would say that he tried to "frame" Trump.

Let's keep our fingers crossed that we will find out the truth one the Justice Department's

Inspector General has released their final report.

For more infomation >> Ex United States Attorney Drops Bombshell Obama CIA Chief Pushed Operation to Frame Donald Trump - Duration: 10:54.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. seeks to cut trade deficit with China in trade talks - Duration: 2:07.

Trade officials of Washington and Beijing met once again.

A more amicable atmosphere was set for their latest sit-down in the U.S. capital, mainly

because of President Trump's decision on Chinese telecom firms.

Choi Si-young provides a closer look into round 2 of their talks.

The focus of the talks was on narrowing the trade deficit.

The U.S. delegation led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur

Ross and Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer sat down with its Chinese counterparts led

by vice-premier Liu He to try and settle trade disputes.

At the meeting, the US demanded China reduce its trade surplus by 200 billion U.S. dollars

by 2020.

The U.S. also requested the Chinese government to discontinue support for "China Manufacturing

2025," China's blueprint for upgrading its manufacturing sector.

China seemed receptive to the U.S. demands.

The Chinese government is considering removing punitive tariffs on imported U.S. agriculture

items.

It is also reviewing whether to ease non-tariff barriers like import quotas, government subsidies

or customs delays.

"We hope to not see the escalation of U.S.-China trade tensions.

Of course, we have made preparations for all outcomes."

Such moves come in response to President Trump's surprising decision to lift the ban on Chinese

telecommunications firms doing business in the United States.

"We hope that the relevant departments of the U.S. side will take realistic actions

quickly to resolve the (ZTE) case in a just and fair manner."

Adding to the positive outlook on the negotiations is the reduced role of hawkish White House

trade adviser and harsh China critic Peter Navarro.

He is participating in the discussions at the negotiating table but is not officially

on the U.S. representative list.

He was on the official delegation at the first round of trade talks in Beijing.

With China displaying a more agreeable posture and fewer hardliners in the US delegation,

experts are predicting a more positive result from these trade negotiations than from the

previous round in Beijing.

Choi Si-young, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. seeks to cut trade deficit with China in trade talks - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Scott, Nelson hope new Floridians help their U.S. Senate bid - Duration: 4:11.

For more infomation >> Scott, Nelson hope new Floridians help their U.S. Senate bid - Duration: 4:11.

-------------------------------------------

Driver of pickup truck killed in crash on US 62 in Licking County - Duration: 0:21.

For more infomation >> Driver of pickup truck killed in crash on US 62 in Licking County - Duration: 0:21.

-------------------------------------------

Nikki Haley Stuns The Middle East, Delivers Swift Justice On United Nations Floor - Duration: 2:18.

For more infomation >> Nikki Haley Stuns The Middle East, Delivers Swift Justice On United Nations Floor - Duration: 2:18.

-------------------------------------------

With One Question Rand Paul May Have Destroyed The Deep State - Duration: 14:39.

With One Question Rand Paul May Have Destroyed The Deep State

Despite being weakened, the deep state is still at war with President Trump.

Their operatives are lurking in the corners of the White House, waiting to strike.

But with one question that Trump hadn't even considered, Rand Paul may have destroyed

them for good.

Virtually every high-level official with anti-Trump loyalties has been taken down.

But the anti-Trump movement is still working to creep their way back into the higher levels

of the Trump administration.

And in a shocking turn of events, somebody who Trump nominated could actually be an agent

of the deep state.

On the surface, CIA director nominee Gina Haspel seems to be a good fit in the Trump

administration.

That's why every single Republican Senator is supporting her.

Well, every Republican Senator besides one.

Senator Rand Paul is refusing to support Haspel, and for good reason.

Paul is wondering whether Haspel was involved in spying on Donald Trump during his 2016

presidential campaign.

His suspicion is well warranted.

Haspel was very high up in the CIA as the spying was going on.

It is not only possible, but extremely likely that Haspel either knew it was going on, or

was directly involved.

As reported by Politico:

"RAND PAUL HAS ONE LAST QUESTION FOR CIA DIRECTOR NOMINEE GINA HASPEL: WAS SHE AT ALL

INVOLVED WITH ANY SURVEILLANCE OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP DURING THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL

CAMPAIGN?

THE KENTUCKY SENATOR SENT HASPEL A LETTER ON TUESDAY LAYING OUT HIS SUSPICIONS.

THE MISSIVE AMOUNTS TO A LAST-MINUTE EFFORT TO DERAIL HASPEL BEFORE HER EXPECTED CONFIRMATION

BY ATTEMPTING TO GET THE PRESIDENT'S OWN CIA NOMINEE TO ADMIT TO BEING AWARE OF THE

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MONITORING THE PRESIDENT.

"SHE'S HIGH ENOUGH UP IN THE CIA.

I THINK WE SHOULD KNOW WHAT SHE KNOWS ABOUT WHETHER THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WAS SURVEILLED

UPON," PAUL SAID ON FOX NEWS.

"BEFORE SHE'S APPOINTED, IF SHE IS INDEED APPOINTED, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT DOES

SHE KNOW ABOUT THE SURVEILLANCE OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND WHY WAS THE CIA INVOLVED?"

TRUMP IN 2017 ACCUSED FORMER PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA OF HAVING HIS "WIRES TAPPED" IN

TRUMP TOWER IN NEW YORK.

THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LATER SAID THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY SUCH WIRETAPS.

ONE TRUMP CAMPAIGN ADVISER, CARTER PAGE, WAS THE SUBJECT OF FBI SURVEILLANCE, AND OTHER

TRUMP ADVISERS HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE WHO WERE BEING MONITORED.

PAUL IS THE ONLY REPUBLICAN SENATOR WHO OPPOSES HASPEL RIGHT NOW.

ENOUGH DEMOCRATS HAVE COME OUT IN SUPPORT OF HER THIS WEEK TO SEAL HER CONFIRMATION

BEFORE THE END OF THE MONTH."

If Haspel was indeed directly involved in spying on the President, that would be relevant

information for him to know.

And if she knew it was going on, she should at the very least be required to explain herself.

This new revelation could be a serious warning sign about her future in the Trump administration.

She currently has enough support, as a number of Democrats have decided to support her nomination,

and could be confirmed by the end of the month.

Do you think that Trump should look into whether his CIA nominee was involved in spying on

his campaign?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

For more infomation >> With One Question Rand Paul May Have Destroyed The Deep State - Duration: 14:39.

-------------------------------------------

10 year U.S. government bond yield hits nearly 7 year high - Duration: 0:51.

Yields on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes climbed to over 3-point-1-percent,… en route to

its highest level since 2011.

Experts say U.S. yields rose sharply this week... amid speculation that the Federal

Reserve may raise interest rates more aggressively than previously expected.

30-year bonds yields also surpassed 3-point-2-percent,... marking its highest in 3 years.

But the signs of short-dated yields moving above long-dated yields are raising concerns,…

since they serve as indicators of future recession.

Experts also fear... rising U.S. bond yields could result in capital outflow from the emerging

markets.

The Bank of Indonesia hiked its interest rate for the first time since 2014,... and the

country's currency fell by as much as Point-6-percent against the greenback,... to its weakest level

since October 2015.

For more infomation >> 10 year U.S. government bond yield hits nearly 7 year high - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

NATO Secretary General with US President Donald Trump, Oval Office, 17 MAY 2018 - Duration: 12:54.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you very much. It's an honor to have Secretary General Stoltenberg

with us.

NATO has been working very closely with the United States. Our relationship is very good.

Together, we've increased and, really, raised a lot of money from countries that weren't

paying or weren't paying a fair share. We have a little ways to go, but many billions

of dollars of additional money has been raised.

And I really appreciate the great job that you're doing. As most people know, you've

been extended for a long period of time, and I was very much at — I think with my leadership

and — really, the fact is, we pushed it very hard because this gentleman does a tremendous

job at NATO. And I appreciate it.

Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary.

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG: Thank you so much. Thank you so much, Mr. President, for

hosting me and my delegation once again here at the White House. And let me thank you for

the leadership you show on the issue of defense spending because it is very important that

we all contribute more to our shared security. And it is really having an impact because,

as you said, allies are now spending more on defense. All allies are increasing their

defense budgets.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Do you give me credit for that?

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG: You have helped to do that because your leadership has been

important, and it has had a real impact. And we see that because all allies increased and

they add billions to their budget. So that's important because we live in a more unpredictable

world, and then we need strong NATO, and we need to invest more in our security.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, thank you very much for being here. It's an honor.

Q Mr. President, on North Korea — can I ask you a question about North Korea?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, nothing has changed on North Korea that we know of. We have not

been told anything. And if it does, that's fine. If it doesn't, I think we'll probably

have a very successful meeting. But we have not been told anything. We're just reading

stories like you are. We've heard certain things from South Korea. But we'll see what

happens. If the meeting happens, it happens. And if it doesn't, we go on to the next

step.

Q Is this just a typical thing that North Korea does? Did you expect this?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I don't know. I really don't know. No, I want to give everybody

the benefit of a doubt. I think that — I can only say our people are literally dealing

with them right now, in terms of making arrangements for the meeting. So that's a lot different

than what you read. But oftentimes what you read, if it's not fake news, is true.

So we'll see what happens. We are dealing with them now. We may have the meeting; we

may not have the meeting. If we don't have it, that will be very interesting. We'll

see what happens. The border is still quite strong. I think things changed a little bit

when they met with China. They met the second time. As you know, Kim Jong-un had a second

meeting with China, which was a little bit of a surprise meeting.

And we have many of the Chinese here today, as you know — big delegations negotiating

trade — because the United States has been ripped off for many, many years by its bad

trade deals. I don't blame China; I blame our leadership of this country from the past.

We have been ripped off by China — an evacuation of wealth like no country has ever seen before

given to another country that's rebuilt itself based on a lot of the money they've

taken out of the United States. And that's not going to happen anymore.

But there has been a big difference since they had the second meeting with President

Xi. With that being said, my attitude is whatever happens, happens. Either way, we're going

to be in great shape.

Q Would you consider a personal outreach to Kim to get him moving toward — keep him

moving towards —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, we'll see what happens. Look, you have to want to do it. With deals

— that's what I do, is deals. And with deals you have to have two parties that want

to do it. He absolutely wanted to do it. Perhaps he doesn't want to do it. Perhaps they spoke

with China — that could be right — President Xi, a friend of mine, great guy. But he's

for China, and I'm for the United States. And that's the way it is, and I suspect

it's never going to change.

But I will say this: We are continuing to negotiate in terms of location — the location

as to where to meet, how to meet, rooms, everything else. And they've been negotiating like

nothing happened. But if you read the newspapers, maybe it won't happen. I can't tell you

yet. I will tell you very shortly. We're going to know very soon.

Steve.

Q Sir, what are you going to tell the Chinese trade official today during these trade talks?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, I've been telling China that we are — you people have been

covering trade, and you've been covering China, and you've been covering everything

for a long time. Have you ever even seen a negotiating in trade? Nobody has ever seen

anybody from our country even negotiate on trade — trade with China and with other

countries. I'm not just blaming China; China is the biggest. But trade has been a total

one-way street. Right outside of this nation, you take money out like it's — by the

bucket loads, into other — whether it's the European Union, which you know so well;

whether it's Japan or South Korea, or I can name almost every single country in the

world.

We had nobody representing us, and now you have somebody that's very good at this stuff

— me — representing us. And China has taken out hundreds of billions of dollars

a year from the United States. And I explained to President Xi, we can't do that anymore.

We just can't do that anymore. It's a much different situation.

But with all the years, and all the years that you've covered trade and nations and

wars, and everything else, you've never seen people come over from China to work on

a trade deal. Now, will that be successful? I tend to doubt it. The reason I doubt it

is because China has become very spoiled. The European Union has become very spoiled.

Other countries have become very spoiled because they always got 100 percent of whatever they

wanted from the United States. But we can't allow that to happen anymore. We're an incredible

country; we have incredible potential. The potential we have is incredible.

But we lost $800 billion on trade last year, if you add it all up, of which China was around

the $500 billion mark. So we lost $800 billion. Can you believe that? Is that an amazing thing

to even think about? We lost $800 billion on trade. We're not going to be doing that

any longer.

Q Just to follow up, sir, what's happening with ZTE? Are you going to lift the ban on

them?

THE PRESIDENT: ZTE was a company that I spoke to with President Xi. He asked me if I'd

take a look at that because it was very harmful to them in terms of their jobs and probably

other things. And I certainly said I would. He asked me to do it, and I would do that.

I would certainly, out of great respect. I like him; he likes me. We have a great relationship.

He asked me if I'd look at ZTE.

Don't forget, it was my administration, with my full knowledge, that put very, very

strong clamps on ZTE. It wasn't anybody else. It wasn't President Obama. It wasn't

President Bush. It was me. I put very strong clamps on ZTE. They did very bad things to

our country. They did very bad things to our economy.

The one thing I will say: They also buy a large portion of their parts for the phones

that they make, and they're the fourth-largest company in terms of that industry. They buy

those parts from the United States. That's a lot of business. So we have a lot of companies

that won't be selling those parts.

But the President of China, President Xi, asked me to look at it. I said I would look

at it. But anything we do with ZTE is always — it's just a small component of the overall

deal.

I can only tell you this: We're going to come out fine with China. Hopefully China

is going to be happy. I think we will be happy. And as the expression goes, when you're

losing $500 billion a year on trade, you can't lose the trade war; you've already lost

it. We've had horrible representatives in this country that have allowed other countries

to get away with murder, and those days are gone. Those days are over.

So we just want fairness for the workers of this country and for the United States. That's

what's going to happen, okay? I'll let you know about — as time goes by, we'll

let you know, as of this moment, everything we know. I mean, North Korea is actually talking

to us about times and everything else as though nothing happened. Will it happen? Will we

be going on that very special date, and can some great things happen? You know, we're

going to be looking at it very soon.

Yeah, Steve?

Q They seemed to get annoyed by a comment that Ambassador Bolton made about the Libya

model of denuclearization.

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. Well, the Libyan model isn't a model that we have at all, when

we're thinking of North Korea. In Libya, we decimated that country. That country was

decimated. There was no deal to keep Qaddafi. The Libyan model that was mentioned was a

much different deal. This would be with Kim Jong-un — something where he'd be there,

he'd be in his country, he'd be running his country. His country would be very rich.

His people are tremendously industrious.

If you look at South Korea, this would be, really, a South Korean model in terms of their

industry, in terms of what they do. They're hardworking, incredible people.

But the Libyan model was a much different model. We decimated that country. We never

said to Qaddafi, "Oh, we're going to give you protection. We're going give you military

strength. We're going to give you all of these things." We went in and decimated

him. And we did the same thing with Iraq.

Now, whether or not we should have, I could tell you I was against it from the beginning

because look what we have right now: We've spent $7 trillion — can you believe that

— $7 trillion in the Middle East. Right out the window. You might as well throw the

money right out the window. And we've done a lot of infrastructure. We just had airports

approved. You saw that. A lot of things are happening. But we spent $7 trillion in the

Middle East, and look where we are right now. It's pretty sad.

But the model, if you look at that model with Qaddafi, that was a total decimation. We went

in there to beat him. Now that model would take place if we don't make a deal, most

likely. But if we make a deal, I think Kim Jong-un is going to be very, very happy. I

really believe he's going to be very happy.

But this is just the opposite. And I think when John Bolton made that statement, he was

talking about if we're going to be having a problem because we cannot let that country

have nukes. We just can't do it. So that's the way it meant. It's really just the opposite.

Because if you — if you look at — again, you look at Syria, that was a total decimation.

Yes, John.

Q Well, what security guarantees are you willing to give to North Korea, in terms of keeping

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, I'm willing to do — we're willing to do a lot. And he's

willing to, I think, do a lot also. And I think we'll actually have a good relationship,

assuming we have the meeting, and assuming something comes of it. And he'll get protections

that would be very strong.

Syria had never had protections. If you look at Syria, if you look at — or if you look

anywhere around the Middle East — you look at Iraq, you look at Libya — with Libya,

certainly they didn't have protection; they had the exact opposite. That was — that

was absolute decimation. And that's what we planned to do, and that's what we did.

Q Reduce U.S. troop level is a possibility in South Korea?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, I'm not going to talk about that. We're going to say that

he will have very adequate protection, and we'll see how it all turns out. I think

this: The best thing he could ever do is to make a deal.

I have a feeling, however, that, for various reasons, maybe including trade, because they've

never had this problem before — China has never had this problem with us — it could

very well be that he's influencing Kim Jong-un. We'll see what happens, meaning the President

of China, President Xi, could be influencing Kim Jong-un.

But we'll see. That's just — look, if you remember, a few weeks ago, all of the

sudden, out of nowhere, Kim Jong-un went to China to say hello, again, a second time,

to President Xi. I think they were dedicating an aircraft carrier paid for largely by the

United States.

Thank you very much everybody.

Q A question on NATO. Will you ask NATO to be — sorry, will you ask NATO to be more

involved in the —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I can't hear you. I can't. Can't hear you. Thank you everybody.

For more infomation >> NATO Secretary General with US President Donald Trump, Oval Office, 17 MAY 2018 - Duration: 12:54.

-------------------------------------------

Russian WARSHIPS will be PERMANENTLY stationed near Syria in CHALLENGE to US - Duration: 3:03.

For more infomation >> Russian WARSHIPS will be PERMANENTLY stationed near Syria in CHALLENGE to US - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

Trump "doubts" success of US-China trade talks - Duration: 1:32.

President Trump has played down the chances that on-going trade talks between the U.S.

and China will be successful.

Beijing's Vice Premier Liu He is leading a Chinese delegation in Washington for talks

on averting a potentially devastating trade war.

Speaking at the White House on Thursday, Trump said his skepticism stemmed from China being

"spoilt."

"China has taken out hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the United States.

And I explained to President Xi we can't do that anymore.

We just can't do that anymore.

It's a much different situation.

But with all the years and all the years that you've covered trade and nations and wars

and everything else, you've never seen a people come over from China to work on a trade deal.

Now, will that be successful?

I tend to doubt it.

The reason I doubt it is because China has become very spoiled.

The European Union has become very spoiled.

Other countries have become very spoiled.

Because they always got 100 percent of whatever they wanted from the United States."

Washington is demanding a 200-billion dollar cut in China's U.S. trade surplus and greater

protections for intellectual property.

China is demanding President Trump ease penalties imposed on Chinese telecommunications firm

ZTE, as well as an end to restrictions on Chinese investments in the United States.

Trump was slated to meet with Liu later on Thursday.

For more infomation >> Trump "doubts" success of US-China trade talks - Duration: 1:32.

-------------------------------------------

US births hit a 30-year low - Duration: 3:01.

For more infomation >> US births hit a 30-year low - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

S. Korea's top office "will closely coordinate for successful N. Korea, U.S. summit" - Duration: 2:30.

After cancelling the hotly anticipated inter-Korean talks, Pyongyang threatened do the same with

next month's summit with Washington.

In response, Seoul's top office announced plans to mediate between the North and the

U.S... to help narrow differences and ensure the historic event is a success.

Arirang's Cheongwadae correspondent Moon Connyoung starts us off with the outcome of the National

Security Council's meeting.

Breaking its day-long silence since North Korea abruptly called off a high-level dialogue

within hours of the scheduled time and threatened to pull out of next month's historic summit

between its leader Kim Jong-un and U.S. President Donald Trump...

South Korea's presidential Blue House says it will actively perform the role of a mediator

to bridge the gap between the two as they appear to have "some difference in stance"

ahead of their planned summit.

"The members of the National Security Council standing committee decided to closely coordinate

through various channels between South Korea and the U.S. and South and North Korea so

that the upcoming North Korea-U.S. summit will be held successfully in the manner of

mutual respect."

President Moon is traveling to the U.S. next week for a bilateral summit with his U.S counterpart

on the 22nd during which a Blue House official said the South Korean president plans to convey

what he and his chief aides have discerned about Pyongyang's position and attitude...

and vice versa upon return from his U.S trip.

The Blue House and President Moon's key security officials do believe, however, that both North

Korea and the U.S. are still serious and sincere about making the June 12th summit happen...

and intends to continue discussions with North

Korea to hold high-level talks that it cancelled on Wednesday.

"Members of the NSC standing committee reaffirmed their stance that the Panmunjom Declaration

reached at the April 27 inter-Korea summit must be carried out without any disruption

and agreed to continue consulting with the North to hold the high-level talks at an early

date.

"As important and symbolic the April inter-Korean summit was to the South Korean president and

his vision for peace on the Korean peninsula, the North Korea, U.S. summit is actually THE

meeting where Mr. Moon has been placing his bet on in the grand denuclearization and peace

building process on the peninsula.

So, it appears the president who pretty much laid the groundwork up until this point couldn't

just step back and watch Pyongyang and Washington drift any further and away from such hard-won

opportunity.

Moon Connyoung, Arirang News, the Blue House."

For more infomation >> S. Korea's top office "will closely coordinate for successful N. Korea, U.S. summit" - Duration: 2:30.

-------------------------------------------

Ex-US Attorney: Obama CIA Chief Led Operation To Frame Trump - Duration: 4:03.

For more infomation >> Ex-US Attorney: Obama CIA Chief Led Operation To Frame Trump - Duration: 4:03.

-------------------------------------------

Objective of N. Korea-U.S. talks stays same, which is CVID: Bolton - Duration: 1:17.

John Bolton reaffirmed his commitment to making sure the summit happens.

However the top official also highlighted, Washington won't back down on its stance of

complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization of North Korea.

Kim Mok-yeon shares with us his remarks.

U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton has said that he's trying to stay optimistic

and realistic at the same time, following North Korea's summit cancellation threat.

Speaking to Fox News Radio on Wednesday,... Bolton said the U.S. will do everything it

can to have a successful meeting,... but will not back away from its objective,... which

is the complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization of North Korea.

He added that during the recent inter-Korean summit, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un agreed

to denuclearize, and if Pyongyang changes its mind, the U.S. will find out and the scheduled

summit in Singapore will be "pretty short".

The U.S. official also said that he has spoken to his South Korean counterpart, Chung Eui-yong

on the possible reasons behind North Korea's sudden about turn.

The remarks come after the North's vice foreign minister, Kim Kye-gwan threatened that if

Washington continues pushing the North to unilaterally get rid of its nuclear weapons,

Pyongyang will not show up to the summit table.

Kim Mok-yeon, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> Objective of N. Korea-U.S. talks stays same, which is CVID: Bolton - Duration: 1:17.

-------------------------------------------

China gives green light to Toshiba's US $18 bil. sale of its memory-chip unit - Duration: 0:52.

In a move that's being seen as a significant peace offering to the Trump administration,...

China has given the green light to the sale of a majority stake in Toshiba's huge microchip

business to a group led by U.S. investment firm, Bain Capital.

The approval had been on ice for months, but Toshiba said Thursday that the roughly 18

billion U.S. dollar acquisition is set to be completed on June 1st.

Korean chip giant SK Hynix is helping fund the deal and could eventually take a stake

in the Toshiba unit.

The deal is expected to massively increase SK Hynix's global market share in NAND flash-memory

chips, which store data in everything from smartphones to servers.

Clearance of the deal, which was first announced in September of last year, came less than

two weeks before a deadline on the decision and as Chinese negotiators hold trade talks

in the U.S.

For more infomation >> China gives green light to Toshiba's US $18 bil. sale of its memory-chip unit - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

The Deep State's Big Betrayal Just Backfired In This Major Way - Duration: 14:39.

The Deep State's Big Betrayal Just Backfired In This Major Way

The Deep State struck back at the Trump administration.

After days of bombshell stories detailing how the FBI had deployed a spy to infiltrate

the Trump campaign, the Deep State engineered a leak designed to knock Trump and his allies

back on their heels.

But their scheme backfired in this major way.

Deep State operatives in the Department of Justice and the FBI spoon fed the New York

Times a story about the "true origins" of the Russia investigation.

The Times framed the story to make it seem like the FBI bent over backwards not to inject

politics into the investigation and that the Bureau might have caught the Trump campaign

colluding with Russia had it acted more forcefully.

In fact, the only political calculation made was that Trump was likely to lose the election

and FBI leadership didn't want to feed Trump's narrative that the system was rigged against

him.

The Times reports:

AGENTS CONSIDERED, THEN REJECTED, INTERVIEWING KEY TRUMP ASSOCIATES, WHICH MIGHT HAVE SPED

UP THE INVESTIGATION BUT RISKED REVEALING THE EXISTENCE OF THE CASE.

TOP OFFICIALS QUICKLY BECAME CONVINCED THAT THEY WOULD NOT SOLVE THE CASE BEFORE ELECTION

DAY, WHICH MADE THEM ONLY MORE HESITANT TO ACT.

WHEN AGENTS DID TAKE BOLD INVESTIGATIVE STEPS, LIKE INTERVIEWING THE AMBASSADOR, THEY WERE

SHROUDED IN SECRECY.

FEARFUL OF LEAKS, THEY KEPT DETAILS FROM POLITICAL APPOINTEES ACROSS THE STREET AT THE JUSTICE

DEPARTMENT.

PETER STRZOK, A SENIOR F.B.I.

AGENT, EXPLAINED IN A TEXT THAT JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS WOULD FIND IT TOO "TASTY" TO

RESIST SHARING.

"I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT OUR SIDE," HE WROTE.

ONLY ABOUT FIVE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS KNEW THE FULL SCOPE OF THE CASE, OFFICIALS

SAID, NOT THE DOZEN OR MORE WHO MIGHT NORMALLY BE BRIEFED ON A MAJOR NATIONAL SECURITY CASE.

But this fake news was a clever distraction.

The real news in this story is that it confirms the fact that the Obama administration spied

on the Trump campaign and that the FBI used an informant to spy on the campaign and run

active measures against Trump associates.

The Times also reports:

"THE F.B.I.

OBTAINED PHONE RECORDS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS USING NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS — A SECRET

TYPE OF SUBPOENA — OFFICIALS SAID.

AND AT LEAST ONE GOVERNMENT INFORMANT MET SEVERAL TIMES WITH MR.

PAGE AND MR.

PAPADOPOULOS, CURRENT AND FORMER OFFICIALS SAID.

THAT HAS BECOME A POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS POINT, WITH MR.

TRUMP'S ALLIES QUESTIONING WHETHER THE F.B.I.

WAS SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN OR TRYING TO ENTRAP CAMPAIGN OFFICIALS."

The FBI used national security letters to snoop on four Trump campaign team members:

Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Carter Page, and George Papadopoulos.

Even after the months snooping and spying on the Trump campaign – and the two years

in total spent on the investigation – the Times concludes that the FBI has still not

uncovered any evidence of collusion:

"A YEAR AND A HALF LATER, NO PUBLIC EVIDENCE HAS SURFACED CONNECTING MR.

TRUMP'S ADVISERS TO THE HACKING OR LINKING MR.

TRUMP HIMSELF TO THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT'S DISRUPTIVE EFFORTS.

BUT THE ARTICLE'S TONE AND HEADLINE — "INVESTIGATING DONALD TRUMP, F.B.I.

SEES NO CLEAR LINK TO RUSSIA" —

GAVE AN AIR OF FINALITY TO AN INVESTIGATION THAT WAS JUST BEGINNING."

The media mocked Donald Trump's March 2017 tweet where he revealed Obama had wire tapped

him at Trump Tower.

But this story makes it clear Trump was correct.

By spying on Manafort, Flynn, Page, and Papadopoulos, the FBI had access to campaign communications.

The Times reporters acted as willing participants in a Deep State cover up.

They buried the real story – that the Obama administration abused its power and ran active

measures against Donald Trump in plain sight – by dressing it up as the FBI being forced

to spy on the Trump campaign out of patriotic duty.

Do you agree the Obama administration and FBI spying on the Trump campaign is the real

scandal that should be investigated?

Let us know your thoughts

in

the

comment section.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét