Auto news on Youtube May 18 2018

Leakers Confirm What We All Knew the FBI Was Doing to Trump, Heads Will Roll

Leakers have confirmed a new story about what the FBI's been doing.

We now know the agency was working against President Donald Trump all along.

This revelation could mean many heads are about to roll.The term "deep state" gets

thrown around a lot these days.

Many patriots are concerned that powerful people in the intelligence community are trying

to undermine our country.

These people are trained agents, spymasters, and professional killers.

They have been used to topple government around the world and collect intel on our enemies.

But what if these people want power too much?

What if they decide to use their arsenal of skills to influence our own elections?

Perhaps the worst could happen, where these agencies side with one political party over

another?

We know that Barack Obama was pulling a lot of strings during the 2016 election.

In order to help the Democrats and Hillary Clinton, Obama used what influence he had

to control the election.

Despite what the media said, he knew Trump had massive support.

Only recently did we discover he wrongfully acquired FISA warrants to spy on Trump's

campaign.

The end goal was to find dirt to expose Trump and destroy his campaign.

It was a dirty scheme, worse than Watergate.

But now word is coming out that an even bigger scheme was going on.

Under James Comey, the FBI was conducting a spy operation on the Trump campaign.

The breadth of the scheme was truly staggering.

It's clear that this agency was working overtime to prevent Donald Trump from becoming

President.

Leakers to the New York Times confirmed in a story published on Wednesday that the FBI

had run a spy operation on the Trump campaign that involved government informants, secret

subpoenas, and possible wiretaps…

"The F.B.I. obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters

— a secret type of subpoena — officials said.

And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos,"

the Times reported, citing "current and former officials."

The Times' story also seems to conflict with what the FBI has previously maintained

— that the investigation into the Trump campaign began with information that Papadopoulos

had told an Australian diplomat he knew that Russians had stolen emails that would be embarrassing

for Clinton.

…

In fact, it was not until two days after the investigation began that the agents summarized

their interview — which apparently "broke with diplomatic protocol" — and sent the

summary back to Washington.

The Times' story glosses over this discrepancy by saying the agents' report "helped provide

the foundation" for the case – instead of sparked the case – as has been claimed.

[Source: Breitbart]

It's clear there was an elaborate scheme being conducted to investigate Trump's campaign.

The FBI used informants and agents overseas.

Their goal was to find something incriminating against candidate Trump, in the hopes of derailing

his campaign.

Keep in mind, this is most likely illegal.

Federal authorities have no right to dig around in a person's business for no other reason

than "hoping" to find dirt.

Trump and his campaign broke no laws.

Yet the FBI treated him and his people like criminals.

They were sending spies to speak with his staff.

They were intercepting communications, perhaps wiretapping their phones.

Over nothing.

It was a clear abuse of power — all to steal the election for the Democrats.

Now, let's talk about Hillary Clinton.

She was being investigated by the FBI for real crimes.

Yet James Comey decided to appear on TV and announce that she was not in trouble.

Clinton's illegal email server transmitted confidential government documents over an

unsecured network.

She literally jeopardized our national security.

Yet she got no punishment.

Meanwhile, the FBI ran an extensive campaign, just to find dirt on Trump.

So much for liberty and justice for all.

The Times' story also confirms the FBI used the salacious Steele dossier in addition to

"F.B.I. information" to obtain a wiretap on Page.

Democrats have tried to downplay the FBI's reliance on the document.

The story reveals the FBI — instead of alerting the Trump campaign that it might be a target

of Russian influence operations — went to lengths to hide the investigation.

Former Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates claimed in an interview with the Times that

they did not want word of the investigation to leak and to impact the election…

Nowhere in the story, however, is there evidence of any collusion during the campaign.

The story states that Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, was about

to be cleared in November 2016, until he took actions after the election that the FBI wanted

to examine.

The story also states: "The question they confronted still persists: Was anyone in the

Trump campaign tied to Russian efforts to undermine the election?"

[Source: Breitbart]

No evidence, no suggestion of collusion.

Yet the FBI still ran this huge, secret investigation against Donald Trump and his campaign.

And today, they still undermine our government by conducting Robert Mueller's probe.

So after over 2 years, they've found nothing.

They still pretend Trump was involved in something.

Hillary and Obama both have their hands dirty, and nobody investigates.

Clearly, if you're a Democrat in America, you get special treatment.

For more infomation >> Leakers Confirm What We All Knew the FBI Was Doing to Trump, Heads Will Roll - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

Patricia Churchland, What is eliminative materialism? - Duration: 4:10.

"Eliminative materialism" is a funny expression. It has got the two parts

to it. One is materialism, and what materialism really means in this context

is that from all we can tell at this stage, there is only the brain. That

mental processes such as remembering and learning, finding something funny, feeling

hungry, feeling dizzy, that these states that we're aware of are actually states

of the physical brain itself. And so materialism really is the idea that all

of what we think of as the mind is something that the brain does. Now, what

about the eliminative part? Well, many years ago Paul, my husband Paul

Churchland, had the idea that as neuroscience develops and as we discover

more and more about the way the physical brain works some of the psychological

categories may not fit very well onto the things that we are discovering about

the nature of the brain. Categories such as the will where you might think of

someone as having a weak will or someone as having a strong will; you might think

of the will as a particular thing in the brain.

Well, almost certainly that's not the case.

Almost certainly there are a whole lot of areas of the brain that cooperate and

integrate when decisions and choices are made. There probably is nothing which is

the will itself. And in that sense I guess you would say that the notion of

the will could be eliminated, not from everyday speech because we're

probably going to continue to talk about those things, but from scientific speech.

It was a prediction about the development of science

and it was really motivated by noticing things like this - that for a long time

people wondered about the fundamental elements and it was widely believed that

the fundamental elements that make all the stuff - the coffee and the chocolate

and the butter and the fire and everything - consisted of earth air fire

and water. Well but by the 19th century it was very

clear that those things themselves were not fundamental but were composed of

many different kinds of things. So the notion of an element profoundly changed

and it profoundly changed because of some basic ideas by Mendeleev. He

realized that the more fundamental things were oxygen, aluminum, hydrogen, tin,

gold; those were the fundamental elements and

so in that sense earth, air, fire and water

you might say God sort of heaved out or eliminated as the fundamental elements.

So Paul was really motivated by the idea that although our current psychological

categories can seem very useful to us and indeed they are, as science

progresses we may find the fit between those categories and then what we're

learning about the brain is not a very good fit. What will happen then? It's hard

to know.

For more infomation >> Patricia Churchland, What is eliminative materialism? - Duration: 4:10.

-------------------------------------------

Leakers Confirm What We All Knew the FBI Was Doing to Trump, Heads Will Roll - Duration: 6:04.

Leakers Confirm What We All Knew the FBI Was Doing to Trump, Heads Will Roll

Leakers have confirmed a new story about what the FBI's been doing.

We now know the agency was working against President Donald Trump all along.

This revelation could mean many heads are about to roll.The term "deep state" gets

thrown around a lot these days.

Many patriots are concerned that powerful people in the intelligence community are trying

to undermine our country.

These people are trained agents, spymasters, and professional killers.

They have been used to topple government around the world and collect intel on our enemies.

But what if these people want power too much?

What if they decide to use their arsenal of skills to influence our own elections?

Perhaps the worst could happen, where these agencies side with one political party over

another?

We know that Barack Obama was pulling a lot of strings during the 2016 election.

In order to help the Democrats and Hillary Clinton, Obama used what influence he had

to control the election.

Despite what the media said, he knew Trump had massive support.

Only recently did we discover he wrongfully acquired FISA warrants to spy on Trump's

campaign.

The end goal was to find dirt to expose Trump and destroy his campaign.

It was a dirty scheme, worse than Watergate.

But now word is coming out that an even bigger scheme was going on.

Under James Comey, the FBI was conducting a spy operation on the Trump campaign.

The breadth of the scheme was truly staggering.

It's clear that this agency was working overtime to prevent Donald Trump from becoming

President.

Leakers to the New York Times confirmed in a story published on Wednesday that the FBI

had run a spy operation on the Trump campaign that involved government informants, secret

subpoenas, and possible wiretaps…

"The F.B.I. obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters

— a secret type of subpoena — officials said.

And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos,"

the Times reported, citing "current and former officials."

The Times' story also seems to conflict with what the FBI has previously maintained

— that the investigation into the Trump campaign began with information that Papadopoulos

had told an Australian diplomat he knew that Russians had stolen emails that would be embarrassing

for Clinton.

…

In fact, it was not until two days after the investigation began that the agents summarized

their interview — which apparently "broke with diplomatic protocol" — and sent the

summary back to Washington.

The Times' story glosses over this discrepancy by saying the agents' report "helped provide

the foundation" for the case – instead of sparked the case – as has been claimed.

[Source: Breitbart]

It's clear there was an elaborate scheme being conducted to investigate Trump's campaign.

The FBI used informants and agents overseas.

Their goal was to find something incriminating against candidate Trump, in the hopes of derailing

his campaign.

Keep in mind, this is most likely illegal.

Federal authorities have no right to dig around in a person's business for no other reason

than "hoping" to find dirt.

Trump and his campaign broke no laws.

Yet the FBI treated him and his people like criminals.

They were sending spies to speak with his staff.

They were intercepting communications, perhaps wiretapping their phones.

Over nothing.

It was a clear abuse of power — all to steal the election for the Democrats.

Now, let's talk about Hillary Clinton.

She was being investigated by the FBI for real crimes.

Yet James Comey decided to appear on TV and announce that she was not in trouble.

Clinton's illegal email server transmitted confidential government documents over an

unsecured network.

She literally jeopardized our national security.

Yet she got no punishment.

Meanwhile, the FBI ran an extensive campaign, just to find dirt on Trump.

So much for liberty and justice for all.

The Times' story also confirms the FBI used the salacious Steele dossier in addition to

"F.B.I. information" to obtain a wiretap on Page.

Democrats have tried to downplay the FBI's reliance on the document.

The story reveals the FBI — instead of alerting the Trump campaign that it might be a target

of Russian influence operations — went to lengths to hide the investigation.

Former Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates claimed in an interview with the Times that

they did not want word of the investigation to leak and to impact the election…

Nowhere in the story, however, is there evidence of any collusion during the campaign.

The story states that Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, was about

to be cleared in November 2016, until he took actions after the election that the FBI wanted

to examine.

The story also states: "The question they confronted still persists: Was anyone in the

Trump campaign tied to Russian efforts to undermine the election?"

[Source: Breitbart]

No evidence, no suggestion of collusion.

Yet the FBI still ran this huge, secret investigation against Donald Trump and his campaign.

And today, they still undermine our government by conducting Robert Mueller's probe.

So after over 2 years, they've found nothing.

They still pretend Trump was involved in something.

Hillary and Obama both have their hands dirty, and nobody investigates.

Clearly, if you're a Democrat in America, you get special treatment.

For more infomation >> Leakers Confirm What We All Knew the FBI Was Doing to Trump, Heads Will Roll - Duration: 6:04.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Behemoth Was Real? - Duration: 4:52.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey.

The Behemoth is a hulking land beast, described in the book of Job, that was said to be a

masterpiece of creation.

It has been the subject of much discussion, and even has a ride named after it at Canada's

Wonderland.

But what if this creature was not a mythical beast, or an amusement park ride, but actually

a real animal that lived to this day?

Let's explore.

If you want more What If videos, check out our "Biggest What Ifs" playlist on the

channel.

Now get ready, it's time to ask the question: What if the Behemoth was Real?

As was the case in our video about The Leviathan, this video will not discuss whether or not

the Bible is true, or whether the Behemoth was meant to be taken literally or metaphorically.

Feel free to debate it in the comments, but the following will simply be looking at a

world in which the literal interpretation of the Behemoth stories is true, and the creature

remained alive today.

The description of the Behemoth is brief, but relatively detailed.

It describes a male creature that eats grass like an ox, with strength in his loins, and

force in the navel of his belly.

He moves his tail like a cedar, with the sinews of his stones wrapped together.

And his bones are like bars of iron.

It goes on to state that he lies under shady trees and among the reeds, and drinks a great

deal from the river, with its nose piercing through snares.

Some of the wording is rather ambiguous, but this description has led to a number of guesses

as to what the Behemoth actually was.

Some believe it to simply be a large hippopotamus, or an elephant, since they seem to fit the

description and could have been present at the time.

However, the line that talks about the Behemoth moving his tail like a cedar leads many to

believe that it might not be a living animal at all, but rather a dinosaur.

Many believe that the tail, the size, and the fact that it seems to eat plants rather

than meat, point to the Behemoth actually being some sort of sauropod, like the Brachiosaurus.

Of course, if a dinosaur still existed, that would open up a whole other can of worms that

I can't get into in this video.

If you want to hear more on that, check out our video, What if Dinosaurs Never Went Extinct.

It should also be noted that others interpret this line about the cedar tree differently,

with some claiming it to refer to an elephant's trunk, or that it refers to the brush at the

tip of the elephant's tail.

Some even believe that it could be referring to the beast's penis.

This isn't as ridiculous as it might seem; the Hebrew word for "move" could also

mean extend, something that penises rather often do.

The line preceding it refers to the strength in his loins.

Plus, the following line refers to the sinew of his "STONES" wrapped together.

Good luck getting THAT image out of your head.

As you may already suspect, if this beast was real, whether it be an elephant, hippo,

rhino, or something else entirely, the implications would be far, far less worrisome than those

of the Leviathan's existence.

While the Leviathan was described as a savage, dangerous beast, the Behemoth seems to be

a peaceful, plant-eating creature.

This means that we wouldn't need to avoid certain places out of fear of the Behemoth.

It's possible that we would even live alongside it, with people making spiritual journeys

to visit the holy creature.

That said, while this beast might not attack people, that doesn't mean it would have

no effect on the world.

For one, it would seem that the Behemoth had some sort of supernatural ability.

Assuming the same specific creature mentioned in scripture was still alive to this day,

this millennia old beast would clearly be magically long-lived.

It's possible that someone would attempt to study the beast, in order to figure out

how it managed to live so long.

Of course, it's possible that this would result in an immediate smiting from God.

But it's also possible that God would allow this, as he allegedly allows other acts to

be committed due to free will.

If, by some miracle, the secret behind the extended lifespan was discovered, and found

to be replicable, this would be wonderful for humanity, at least in the short term.

People could live far longer, only dying from accidents or injuries, which would give us

far more time to do things, and could result in a more relaxed world.

On the other hand, if long life was common, overpopulation would quickly become a significant

issue, with more people being born, but far fewer people dying.

For this reason, and also due to human greed, the procedure would likely become extremely

expensive, with only a select few able to extend their life indefinitely.

However, there is one further implication that wasn't touched on in the last video.

If this Behemoth was found to be real, this would be used as evidence for the literal

interpretation of the Bible.

Many evangelical Christians would hold it up as proof, claiming that the fact that this

part was true must mean that others must be as well.

Of course, this would not be convincing to everyone; most people already accept that

the Bible does have at least some historical truth to it.

But this could act as a catalyst for certain believers to shift to a more literal interpretation

of the Bible.

And now we return to our question: What if the Behemoth was Real?

Well, unlike the Leviathan, it seems we wouldn't have to fear the Behemoth, since it would

likely be a fairly peaceful herbivorous animal, possible a large elephant or hippo.

Its existence would likely be used by fundamentalists to support their literal interpretation, but

it wouldn't stop there.

It's possible that the beast would be studied, and its extended lifespan could hold the key

to extending human life beyond our wildest dreams.

On the other hand, it could have just referred to a random elephant, or even a metaphor for

something else, in which case this would all be moot.

Scripture's pretty vague that way.

Thank you for watching Life's Biggest Questions, I hope this was interesting and informative,

and maybe even inspired you to look into it further on your own.

If you liked this video, please thumbs up and subscribe to the channel down below.

While you're down there, let me know what YOU would do if you could live forever.

Until next time, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey with Life's Biggest Questions, wishing you

the best of luck, on your quest for answers.

For more infomation >> What If The Behemoth Was Real? - Duration: 4:52.

-------------------------------------------

What Does Stacey Esterly Say Was First Thing Husband Kevin Said To Her After He Was Put In Jail F… - Duration: 2:07.

For more infomation >> What Does Stacey Esterly Say Was First Thing Husband Kevin Said To Her After He Was Put In Jail F… - Duration: 2:07.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking News - Sam Allardyce disappointed with how Everton exit was handled - Duration: 2:36.

Sacked Everton manager Sam Allardyce admits he was disappointed at his dismissal but says he knew it was coming after reading media reports

The 63-year-old was jettisoned after less than six months in charge after a short meeting with majority shareholder Farhad Moshiri on Wednesday morning

Discontent from fans had risen to a level which had made the Goodison Park atmosphere toxic but Allardyce was unhappy with the way his exit was touted in the media well before he had received official confirmation

'I'm surprised how it came about. It seemed to be done and dusted through the media before I met Farhad,' he told talkSPORT

'I think it was out there in the open for a couple of days. That leaves you with the certainty of what was going to happen

'It was slightly disappointing. Who was involved in that I couldn't tell you, but something as delicate as that is something you want to be confidential

' Allardyce added: 'I think when it's so open in the press, from the day before, it was highly unlikely it was going to be anything else

'I prepared myself for what was being said by the press a couple of days before

'My meeting with Farhad was amicable. We conducted ourselves amicably but I expressed a disappointment with how it got out

I accept it and move on.'

For more infomation >> Breaking News - Sam Allardyce disappointed with how Everton exit was handled - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

Look What Happened Immediately After John Kerry Was Spotted With Iranians - Duration: 13:12.

Look What Happened Immediately After John Kerry Was Spotted With Iranians

Before President Donald Trump pulled out of the Iran deal last week, former Secretary

of State John Kerry was spotted meeting with Iranian officials as he frantically tried

to save the deal.

Now, this has literally blown up in his face in a huge way.

Right Wing News reported that Jason Osborne, a former senior advisor to Donald Trump's

2016 campaign, took to Twitter to write about Kerry's treasonous antics in Iran.

"So John Kerry just left a meeting @ L'Avenue in Paris w/3 Iranians.

A friend was sitting next to their table and heard JK blasting @realDonaldTrump.

The Iranians had a 5 person security detail and left in diplomatic vehicles.

Is he FARA registered?" he tweeted.

One of the officials Kerry met with has since been identified as Kamal Kharzai, Iranian

politician, and diplomat, as well as Iran's Minister of Foreign Affairs from August 1997

until 2005 These meetings have completely backfired,

however, as an Iranian organization is now offering a $100,000 reward to any person who

bombs the newly opened U.S. embassy in Jerusalem.

The group offering this bounty is the Iranian Justice Seeker Student Movement, which is

distributing posters calling for an attack on the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, which has

been opposed by Palestinian and Iranian officials as an affront to the holy city.

"The Student Justice Movement will support anybody who destroy the illegal American embassy

in Jerusalem," the posters state in Farsi, Arabic, and English.

There will be a "$100,000 dollar prize for the person who destroys the illegal American

embassy in Jerusalem," the poster continues.

Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon adviser, explained that terrorism of this nature is

embedded in the Iranian regime's hardline stance.

"Unfortunately, terrorism directed toward diplomats and embassies has become a central

pillar of the Islamic Republic's culture," Rubin said.

"Terrorism is lionized in Iranian schools.

This bounty is more the rule than the exception.

To blame Washington or Jerusalem is to blame the victim and give terrorists a veto over

U.S. policy."

It's disturbing that Kerry tried to save a deal by meeting with officials from a nation

that is so blatantly threatening the U.S.

SHARE this story so we can EXPOSE John Kerry!