Stop the car!
Take cover!
Hi, my name is Gabe and in this video I'll be looking into The Hurt Locker.
Did you know that, adjusting for inflation,
The Hurt Locker is the lowest grossing best picture winner of all time?
That's unfortunate, because I think it is not just one of the best war films,
but one of the best films of any genre, ever made.
I'm craving a burger, is that strange?
Not for you, no.
Before I begin: spoilers ahead.
Alright, lets get into it.
IED!
The first thing I'd like to address is the number one complaint about this film:
that it, Staff Sergeant James in particular, is an inaccurate depiction of how US soldiers operate.
I have no doubt this is true; even if the writer, who was imbedded as a journalist in Iraq,
claims every event in the film actually happened.
For every event to happen to the same person,
or rather, for the same person to do all the things James does,
You want me to go close to it?
Yeah.
- [Arabic] - No, I'm kidding, I'm kidding.
really does seem unreal.
But this doesn't bother me.
I used to simply say that the film is a narrative, not a documentary, but that is a cop out explanation.
The real reason this doesn't bother me is it isn't what the film is about.
Other than at the plot level, The Hurt Locker isn't about US soldiers, or operations in Iraq,
or anything like that.
Instead, the film is about something else entirely,
and it's not a secret either; they tell us right up front.
This film is about war being an addiction.
There's no question that James loves bomb diffusion too much; he practically tells us so here.
The older you get, the fewer things your really love.
By the time you get to my age, maybe its only one or two things.
With me I think it's one.
But no one else in the film even likes Iraq.
I fucking hate this place.
Alright, let's get out of this fucking desert!
Because of this, the film clearly is not about soldiers being addicted to war.
I've actually heard few criticisms on the accuracy of Sanborn and Eldridge,
leading me to believe that they, not James, are meant to represent the actual soldiers in Iraq.
So who does James represent?
A common plot point in this film is how James's behavior puts not only himself in danger,
Get down now!
but Sanborn and Eldridge as well.
We can go!
And if Sanborn and Eldridge represent the soldiers fighting in Iraq,
that means James represents those putting them in danger.
Now turn of your goddamn torch, because we're going.
Despite this, James clearly does not represent insurgents, or terrorists, or anything like that.
I mean, he's fighting them, he tries to save the people they sacrifice,
and he loves the US and hates its enemies;
You know there are guys watching us right now.
They're laughing at this!
this last fact alone makes it clear that James is not meant to represent them.
So other than the enemy, who else put US soldiers at risk?
One group is the people who sent them to war in the first place.
And that is who James represents:
the American people, specifically Bush's America,
specifically specifically the people and politicians in Bush's America
who supported the war and sent soldiers to Iraq.
You want to go out there?
Yes I do.
This may be an esoteric claim, but there is evidence in the film to support it.
James bills himself as a proud redneck,
I'm pretty sure I can figure out a redneck piece of trailer trash like you.
Well it looks like you're on the right track.
the people Bush most appealed to and who, more than anyone, claim to be "true Americans".
James also views his work as a game,
Game-face buddy, let's go.
while in the US war dominates the video game industry
and we even put Iraqi's most wanted on playing cards.
Nine-of-hearts, that's one. And the other, Al Rouie(?), jack-of-clubs.
James also prefers boots on the ground as a first response and in general has a cocky,
cowboy attitude, something many said was characteristic of the US when Bush was in charge.
So if James is addicted to war, and James represents Bush's America,
that means that, according to the filmmakers, Bush's America was addicted to war too.
The natural follow up is: what does the film have to say about this?
I mean, addiction isn't necessarily bad, not if it can be channeled into something positive.
Like what I'm guessing Kathryn Bigelow does with filmmaking; from what I can see,
her feelings about filmmaking are how she connected with James and put herself into this movie.
The Hurt Locker actually has multiple instances where it gives its thoughts on this issue.
First, there's the fact that James loves bomb diffusion, an inherently non-destructive act,
very different than if he were a mercenary, sniper, demolition expert, or anything like that.
And you can add to this that he is really good at his job.
There's also the fact that deep down, James is a good person,
one who is caring, is guided by honorable principles, and knows the difference between right and wrong.
And at the end of the day, he's there for his team and he does try to do the right thing,
no matter how much it doesn't seem so sometimes.
Everything I just mentioned is positive, and these are the reasons that at first glance,
The Hurt Locker may seem more neutral than anti-Iraq war.
You're alright buddy, you're alright.
But anti-Iraq war it is, as is shown in several other moments.
Like this one.
Despite all of James's talent and bravado, despite everything he's accomplished,
this is the first time he has the opportunity to save someone who needs saving, and he fails.
Sure, it's not his fault and he did all he could, but still.
There's also this scene, where James literally breaks into an Iraqi's home,
then refuses to connect with the homeowners when they treat him as their guest.
You are a guest. Please, sit down.
I'm a guest...
Or here, where James was making friends with an Iraqi,
before events occurred that made the friendship not worth it.
Hey man? What's up?
And there's also this line:
Well if he wasn't an insurgent he sure the hell is now.
Sure, it's said jokingly but also in an ironic and funny-because-it's-true style.
Additional evidence that The Hurt Locker does not support Bush's America's war mentality
can be seen through other characters.
Like Eldridge, who ridicules the quality of items built by the US Army
Did you build that?
No, the US Army did.
and also complains about how much of the war is a waste.
Aren't you glad the Army has all these tanks parked here?
Just in case the Russians come, we have to have a big tank battle.
Or Sanborn, and how he believes the people back home feel about him.
Shrapnel zings by, slices my throat,
I bleed out like a pig in the sand.
Nobody'll give a shit.
And how about this guy, who clearly represents out of touch Americans,
the ones who keep soldiers fighting while they sit on the sidelines.
You know, this doesn't have to be a bad time in your life.
Going to war is a once-in-a-lifetime experience!
It could be fun.
And you know this from your extensive work in the field?
I've done my field duty.
Where was that? Yale?
In the end, he is shown to be an idiot.
But more damning than everything I just mentioned is this scene.
I mean, how do you do it, you know,
take the risk?
I don't know, I just uh,
I guess I don't think about it.
James could have said he does what he does because he knows he's doing the right thing,
or that he is doing his part to make the world a better place.
But he doesn't.
It turns out that once you understand what The Hurt Locker is doing,
you find that it is strongly against the Iraq war.
And even moreso, it is against the mentality of the politicians and citizens who supported it.
But judging by the popularity of films more supportive of Bush's wars,
including Bigelow's very own Zero Dark Thirty,
this clearly wasn't a message many people wanted to hear.
But regardless of whether you wanted to hear it or not,
it is hard to argue that this isn't exceptional filmmaking,
because it is.
For more infomation >> Gov. Martinez visits US-Mexico border - Duration: 0:39. 
For more infomation >> US Navy Accepts Delivery of Its Newest Stealth Destroyer - Duration: 1:02. 
For more infomation >> IS U S OFFERING F 22 RAPTOR TO INDIA UNDER MAKE IN INDIA PROGRAM - Duration: 2:57. 
For more infomation >> Chief Willard nominated to be U.S. Marshal of New Hampshire - Duration: 1:51. 
For more infomation >> FORTNITE BATTLE ROYALE METEORS ARE HITTING US!!! SEASON 4 ALMOST OUT :) - Duration: 1:57:45. 
For more infomation >> The US attorney is already using Trump's 'Fox and Friends' comments about Michael Cohen against him - Duration: 4:44. 
For more infomation >> Pompeo can make progress with North Korea: State Department Official - Duration: 4:05. 
For more infomation >> US sorghum ships bound for China reroute to Saudi Arabia - Duration: 5:04. 
For more infomation >> Millions Flee Top 3 Democrat States After Donald Drops The SALT Hammer - Duration: 3:20. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét