Auto news on Youtube Apr 27 2018

Kanye In A MAGA Hat Infuriates Fans With What Else Was In His Selfie, Now Libs Want Him

Hospitalized!

Rapper and business mogul Kanye West has seemingly come out of nowhere this week as one of President

Donald Trump's number one supporters.

He's been on a non-stop campaign for conservatives and infuriating all his fans, who are mad

that a black superstar "switched teams."

Kanye isn't slowing down and doesn't care who is mad about his opinions.

He's rubbing his Trump support in their faces even more today with a selfie he just

shared.

Kanye supported Trump during his campaign, which his fans may have forgotten about since

he hasn't said much since until now.

He seems to be agitated about what he's seen the president endure, and the senseless

attacks and started ranting this week, with no end in sight.

Now, he's finding himself on the receiving end of the verbal abuse by liberals everywhere,

who can't imagine how a black rapper could support our allegedly racist president.

He's even being accused of suffering a mental breakdown since people don't think, that

there's any other feasible explanation for supporting Trump.

Once his selfie surfaced, the attack took a turn into some truly bizarre territory.

According to Fox News, it began with his rant on Twitter:

Something is going on with Kanye West.

The rapper has been ranting wildly on Twitter following reports that he abruptly fired his

manager Scooter Braun.

Beginning Tuesday and extending into Wednesday afternoon, the rapper tweeted nearly constantly

about everything from his Yeezy fashion line to Coachella and his daughter, North.

He even took the time to send some love to his "brother" Donald Trump and Hillary

Clinton.

Later, Kanye put on a Trump "Make America Great Again" cap and snapped a selfie with

YouTube's Global Head of Music, Lyor Cohen.

People weren't half as mad about the hat as they were about the hand gesture seen in

the picture, which they claimed to Kanye's hand.

They were wrong about whose hand it was and what the sign means.

TMZ reports:

Everyone who thinks Kanye West's red MAGA hat photo also features a man flashing an

alt-right symbol needs to chill, because it's not true.

The man giving the OK sign, which many believe is a gesture used by the alt-right or white

supremacists is YouTube's Global Head of Music, Lyor Cohen but it's not even an OK

sign to him.

A rep for YouTube tells us Cohen's gesture is meant to represent the company he founded

300 Entertainment, and nothing more.

He's also done it several times before.

As we reported Kanye's been on the Trump Train Wednesday, sending out several tweets

about his love for the Prez, including the provocative selfie with Cohen and Lucian Grainge,

CEO of Universal Music.

But now we know, even though Ye's embracing Trump he's not hanging with people who embrace

the alt-right.

It didn't take long for West's wife, Kim Kardashian, to chime in and require her husband

to clarify a few things about his political tweets.

She also launched a rant of her own on Twitter in defense of her husband and his message.

Everyone seemed to think that Kim would separate herself from Kanye over this to not want to

be part of his "crazy."

They were wrong again.

Kanye doesn't seem to be taking his MAGA hat off anytime soon no matter who it offends

as he was seen out and about in California with the hat on.

People Magazine reports:

The musician, 40, strolled out his office in Calabasas, California, on Wednesday wearing

a red "Make America Great Again" hat and his phone in hand after a full day of controversial

tweets, some of which declared his love for President Donald Trump.

West called Trump "my brother" in a series of tweets early Wednesday, writing, "You

don't have to agree with trump [sic] but the mob can't make me not love him.

We are both dragon energy.

He is my brother.

I love everyone.

I don't agree with everything anyone does.

That's what makes us individuals.

And we have the right to independent thought."

West later tweeted a closeup photo of his MAGA hat signed by Trump with over 30 fire

emojis, writing "my MAGA hat is signed."

Fox News explains that there are multiple claims now coming out about Kanye who dared

show is love for Trump:

Sources in the industry told Page Six they are "very worried for Yeezy's mental health"

and worry that he could be on the verge of "another episode."

In the midst of West's bizarre Twitter rant, it was also reported that the "Famous"

rapper has had "explosive fights" with his mother-in-law, Kim Kardashian's mom

Kris Jenner.

But the momager quickly shot down the rumors and did some tweeting of her own.

She further defended her son-in-law and retweeted another article, which alleged the Kanye has

been "on edge" and "difficult to deal with" and said, "Nope…not true!"

No one really knows if Kanye's love for Trump is real or just a gimmick to be in the

spotlight.

But one thing is for sure, he doesn't get a lot of mainstream media attention for his

friendship with the president.

We'd rather see celebs use Trump in this positive way to boost their fame rather than

using his name in a derogatory way, which seems to be the norm.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> Kanye In A MAGA Hat Infuriates Fans With What Else Was In His Selfie, Now Libs Want Him Hospitalized - Duration: 5:26.

-------------------------------------------

What The Hurt Locker Actually Says about the US, its Soldiers, and Iraq - Duration: 10:24.

Stop the car!

Take cover!

Hi, my name is Gabe and in this video I'll be looking into The Hurt Locker.

Did you know that, adjusting for inflation,

The Hurt Locker is the lowest grossing best picture winner of all time?

That's unfortunate, because I think it is not just one of the best war films,

but one of the best films of any genre, ever made.

I'm craving a burger, is that strange?

Not for you, no.

Before I begin: spoilers ahead.

Alright, lets get into it.

IED!

The first thing I'd like to address is the number one complaint about this film:

that it, Staff Sergeant James in particular, is an inaccurate depiction of how US soldiers operate.

I have no doubt this is true; even if the writer, who was imbedded as a journalist in Iraq,

claims every event in the film actually happened.

For every event to happen to the same person,

or rather, for the same person to do all the things James does,

You want me to go close to it?

Yeah.

- [Arabic] - No, I'm kidding, I'm kidding.

really does seem unreal.

But this doesn't bother me.

I used to simply say that the film is a narrative, not a documentary, but that is a cop out explanation.

The real reason this doesn't bother me is it isn't what the film is about.

Other than at the plot level, The Hurt Locker isn't about US soldiers, or operations in Iraq,

or anything like that.

Instead, the film is about something else entirely,

and it's not a secret either; they tell us right up front.

This film is about war being an addiction.

There's no question that James loves bomb diffusion too much; he practically tells us so here.

The older you get, the fewer things your really love.

By the time you get to my age, maybe its only one or two things.

With me I think it's one.

But no one else in the film even likes Iraq.

I fucking hate this place.

Alright, let's get out of this fucking desert!

Because of this, the film clearly is not about soldiers being addicted to war.

I've actually heard few criticisms on the accuracy of Sanborn and Eldridge,

leading me to believe that they, not James, are meant to represent the actual soldiers in Iraq.

So who does James represent?

A common plot point in this film is how James's behavior puts not only himself in danger,

Get down now!

but Sanborn and Eldridge as well.

We can go!

And if Sanborn and Eldridge represent the soldiers fighting in Iraq,

that means James represents those putting them in danger.

Now turn of your goddamn torch, because we're going.

Despite this, James clearly does not represent insurgents, or terrorists, or anything like that.

I mean, he's fighting them, he tries to save the people they sacrifice,

and he loves the US and hates its enemies;

You know there are guys watching us right now.

They're laughing at this!

this last fact alone makes it clear that James is not meant to represent them.

So other than the enemy, who else put US soldiers at risk?

One group is the people who sent them to war in the first place.

And that is who James represents:

the American people, specifically Bush's America,

specifically specifically the people and politicians in Bush's America

who supported the war and sent soldiers to Iraq.

You want to go out there?

Yes I do.

This may be an esoteric claim, but there is evidence in the film to support it.

James bills himself as a proud redneck,

I'm pretty sure I can figure out a redneck piece of trailer trash like you.

Well it looks like you're on the right track.

the people Bush most appealed to and who, more than anyone, claim to be "true Americans".

James also views his work as a game,

Game-face buddy, let's go.

while in the US war dominates the video game industry

and we even put Iraqi's most wanted on playing cards.

Nine-of-hearts, that's one. And the other, Al Rouie(?), jack-of-clubs.

James also prefers boots on the ground as a first response and in general has a cocky,

cowboy attitude, something many said was characteristic of the US when Bush was in charge.

So if James is addicted to war, and James represents Bush's America,

that means that, according to the filmmakers, Bush's America was addicted to war too.

The natural follow up is: what does the film have to say about this?

I mean, addiction isn't necessarily bad, not if it can be channeled into something positive.

Like what I'm guessing Kathryn Bigelow does with filmmaking; from what I can see,

her feelings about filmmaking are how she connected with James and put herself into this movie.

The Hurt Locker actually has multiple instances where it gives its thoughts on this issue.

First, there's the fact that James loves bomb diffusion, an inherently non-destructive act,

very different than if he were a mercenary, sniper, demolition expert, or anything like that.

And you can add to this that he is really good at his job.

There's also the fact that deep down, James is a good person,

one who is caring, is guided by honorable principles, and knows the difference between right and wrong.

And at the end of the day, he's there for his team and he does try to do the right thing,

no matter how much it doesn't seem so sometimes.

Everything I just mentioned is positive, and these are the reasons that at first glance,

The Hurt Locker may seem more neutral than anti-Iraq war.

You're alright buddy, you're alright.

But anti-Iraq war it is, as is shown in several other moments.

Like this one.

Despite all of James's talent and bravado, despite everything he's accomplished,

this is the first time he has the opportunity to save someone who needs saving, and he fails.

Sure, it's not his fault and he did all he could, but still.

There's also this scene, where James literally breaks into an Iraqi's home,

then refuses to connect with the homeowners when they treat him as their guest.

You are a guest. Please, sit down.

I'm a guest...

Or here, where James was making friends with an Iraqi,

before events occurred that made the friendship not worth it.

Hey man? What's up?

And there's also this line:

Well if he wasn't an insurgent he sure the hell is now.

Sure, it's said jokingly but also in an ironic and funny-because-it's-true style.

Additional evidence that The Hurt Locker does not support Bush's America's war mentality

can be seen through other characters.

Like Eldridge, who ridicules the quality of items built by the US Army

Did you build that?

No, the US Army did.

and also complains about how much of the war is a waste.

Aren't you glad the Army has all these tanks parked here?

Just in case the Russians come, we have to have a big tank battle.

Or Sanborn, and how he believes the people back home feel about him.

Shrapnel zings by, slices my throat,

I bleed out like a pig in the sand.

Nobody'll give a shit.

And how about this guy, who clearly represents out of touch Americans,

the ones who keep soldiers fighting while they sit on the sidelines.

You know, this doesn't have to be a bad time in your life.

Going to war is a once-in-a-lifetime experience!

It could be fun.

And you know this from your extensive work in the field?

I've done my field duty.

Where was that? Yale?

In the end, he is shown to be an idiot.

But more damning than everything I just mentioned is this scene.

I mean, how do you do it, you know,

take the risk?

I don't know, I just uh,

I guess I don't think about it.

James could have said he does what he does because he knows he's doing the right thing,

or that he is doing his part to make the world a better place.

But he doesn't.

It turns out that once you understand what The Hurt Locker is doing,

you find that it is strongly against the Iraq war.

And even moreso, it is against the mentality of the politicians and citizens who supported it.

But judging by the popularity of films more supportive of Bush's wars,

including Bigelow's very own Zero Dark Thirty,

this clearly wasn't a message many people wanted to hear.

But regardless of whether you wanted to hear it or not,

it is hard to argue that this isn't exceptional filmmaking,

because it is.

For more infomation >> What The Hurt Locker Actually Says about the US, its Soldiers, and Iraq - Duration: 10:24.

-------------------------------------------

Inter-Korean Summit D-Day, what is happening inside and out - Duration: 13:10.

We're back

here at the main press center in Kintex.

We're about an hour's drive away from the Panmunjom,... where the inter-Korean talks

are underway at the Peace House.

The second part of the inter-Korean summit is underway.

During the morning session, talks lasted about 100 minutes -- where they discussed the three

agendas: decnuclearization, setting peace on the peninsula, and bettering inter-Korean

ties.

The two sides will be working on a joint statement -- and are expected to give a joint press

conference.

North Korean leader's wife Ri Sol-ju will be arriving at Panmunjom at 6.15 -- and join

the feast tonight.

But for a more in-depth look into the bits and pieces of the summit, joining us in the

studio are two of Arirang's very own reporters.

Hwang Ho-jun -- our Cheong Wa Dae correspondent, and Oh Jung-hee -- our unification ministry

correspondent.

1.

Going back to this morning, it was definitely a historic moment.

Heading into it there was so much anticipation, and also some nerves, no doubt.

It was the first inter-Korean summit to be held on the South Korean side -- with the

two leaders having their first encounter at the military demarcation line.

What were some things that caught your eye?

2.

Now including yourselves, the atmosphere at the main press center was also very overwhelming.

We could hear reporters cheering as the two leaders shook hands and President Moon Jae-in

also stepped over to the North side of the border.

Tell us more about the general response from the media.

3.

Turning to the summit itself.

We know that North Korea has a nine-member delegation and South Korea a seven-member

delegation.

Can you give us some details about the participants and what impact this could have had on the

direction of the talks?

4.

And we heard the opening remarks from the two leaders.

Looking at North Korean leader Kim Jong-un -- he said

that he had been looking forward to his historic meeting.

How did you see his remarks?

Were there any attempts to break the

ice (or other gestures even during the meeting)?

5.

We know that the

two

sides had lunch separately.

The Southern side is known to have wanted to eat together.

Do you think the separate lunch was intentional on

North Korea's part to give them some time on their own to coordinate on the issues that

were discussed or that need to be discussed?

6.

President Moon Jae-in has been an advocate of dialogue with North Korea.

What will he be striving to achieve at the end of Friday's summit?

Well that's all the time we have

for

right now.

Most of us here in South Korea are hoping that the two Koreas are able to make the best

of

the day they have together and that they conclude the

summit with fruitful outcomes.

I'll pass

it over

to our team at

the Dorasan Checkpoint.

For more infomation >> Inter-Korean Summit D-Day, what is happening inside and out - Duration: 13:10.

-------------------------------------------

What Was It Like to be Jailed at Alcatraz? - Duration: 6:34.

A secure lump of steel and concrete sat on an island surrounded by unforgiving currents.

Home to as many as 300 convicted felons, Alcatraz was coined the highest security prison in

America.

Day to day, Alcatraz was also the most expensive prison, state or federal, to operate in the

nation.

The dark hostile image of Alcatraz grew as Hollywood dramatized the brutal conditions

and glamorized the inmates who withstood them.

Were the conditions at Alcatraz really any tougher than any of the other state prisons

of the era?

And did those inmates who attempted to escape the rock succeed?

And is it possible to swim from the island of Alcatraz to the San Francisco bay?

Today, we'll go inside one of the world's most infamous correctional facilities, in

this episode of The Infographics Show – What was it like to be jailed at Alcatraz?

The first Alcatraz warden, James Johnston, had a tough reputation and ran the prison

with an iron fist.

Prisoners weren't allowed to speak to one another at all, except for brief exchanges

at break times.

Speaking aloud generally resulted in a trip to the dungeon or an isolation cell.

Eventually the inmates realized, however, that there were not enough isolation cells

to hold them all simultaneously, so they began to relax and speak en mass.

This eventually resulted in a relaxation of the talking ban.

Magazines and newspapers were banned, as the inmates weren't allowed to read about sex

or crime.

Contrary to popular belief, the inmates weren't all hardened criminals.

Anyone who had committed a federal offence might have been sent to Alcatraz.

Prisoners included shoplifters who had stolen from a store with a post office branch inside,

and folks who had carried alcohol across state lines.

A total of 336 cells were in B and C block and a further 36 segregation cells, and 6

solitary in D block.

A block was used mostly for storage.

The cells in B and C block were 5 feet deep by 9 feet wide, with a small cold water sink.

You could extend your arms and touch both sides of the cell, which is something you

might get around to trying if you were imprisoned in one for a year or more.

Having your own cell means that there is less chance of being sexually assaulted compared

with other prisons, and many prisoners found the privacy beneficial.

You would be allowed an approved visit once a month at Alcatraz, but you wouldn't allowed

to touch that visitor nor discuss any current events; conversations were via intercom, and

usually monitored.

Inmate Willie Radkay, who shared a cell next to Machine Gun Kelly, is on record saying

that the food at Alcatraz was better than any other prison he'd been at.

Alcatraz may not of been the brutal hellhole illustrated by many a Hollywood movie, but

it was no picnic either.

Inmates were marched from place to place, worked under tough conditions, and had a strict

daily routine.

Each morning at 6.20am, a whistle blew, prisoners rose, made their beds, and generally tidied

up their cells, washed and dressed.

At a quarter to 7, inmates moved to the mess hall, where guards supervised seating and

serving, giving the signal to start and stop eating.

Work detail was split into laundry, tailoring, cobbling, modeling, gardening, and other labor

details.

At 9.30, there was a rest period in which inmates were allowed to smoke in permitted

areas, but not allowed to crowd together.

At 9.40, it was back to work until 11.30, when a count was taken and it was back to

the mess hall for food, and then back to the cells.

12.30 back to work until 4.15pm, final eating, and 4.50pm final lock-up and a head count.

At 9.30pm, the lights were put out.

There were three more counts at midnight, 3am and 5am.

The prisoners nicknamed the central walkway Broadway, and other walkways were named Park

Avenue and Michigan Avenue.

The area between cell blocks and the mess hall was named Times Square.

At either end was the gun gallery walkway enclosed by bars patrolled by armed guards

who from that vantage point had a clear shot at the cell blocks.

A prisoner named Bernard Coy decided to break that routine and attempted one of the most

brutal attempts to escape the prison when he hatched up a plan that ended in The Battle

of Alcatraz in May 1946.

Two guards and three inmates were killed and several were injured in the attempted outbreak.

Kentuckian bank robber Coy along with five other inmates dreamed up the escape plan.

Coy smeared himself in axel grease and climbed the West End Gun Gallery.

He used some tools crudely fashioned in the prison workshop to manipulate the bars open

to a width of ten inches, which due to Coy's partial starvation of himself, was wide enough

to squeeze through.

Coy then took on the first guard, and with brute strength knocked him to the ground before

strangling him unconscious with his necktie.

He then lowered firearms and riot clubs to his accomplices below, who swiftly took 9

unarmed guards hostage.

However, they were unable to locate the key to the recreational yard, as one of the guards

had concealed it in the toilet of the cell he was being held hostage in.

Three other inmates were released from their cells, but by this time, the breakout was

discovered and the distress sirens wailed.

San Francisco Coast guard and Marines were alerted, and together they blocked all of

the industry working inmates, while inside the prison a battle was raging.

Two inmates were shot dead in the battle before the guards took back control of the prison.

Other escapes were attempted.

Joseph Bowers was shot and killed climbing a fence in 1936.

Two prisoners escaped the prison in 1937, but it is generally understood that they died

crossing the water, although their bodies were never discovered.

In 1962, brothers Clarence and John Anglin, and Frank Morris (probably the most famous

escapees) chipped away with spoons at the concrete around ventilation grates in their

cells.

They moved through a maintenance area and made a raft with life jackets and raincoats.

They avoided being detected in the nightly headcount by leaving paper mache heads in

their bunks.

They hopped a fence to the bay.

Again the trio was considered drowned yet made famous in the Hollywood, Escape from

Alcatraz starring Clint Eastwood.

Television show Mythbusters tested a raft across the same stretch of water and found

that the escape was technically possible.

And for those who think swimming the distance to the mainland undoable, there's an annual

Alcatraz swimming trip open to all open water swimmers willing to tackle the 3.6 miles around

the island, or the easier 1.25 miles from the island to the mainland.

So what do you think?

Would you be able handle conditions in a state prison?

Or would you make a break for it and swim from the island to the mainland?

Perhaps you've been to the island before?

Please enter your comments in the comments section below and join in the discussion.

Also, be sure to watch our other video called How Rich was Cleopatra and other Pharaohs?

Thanks for watching, and as always, don't forget to like, share and subscribe, see you

next time

For more infomation >> What Was It Like to be Jailed at Alcatraz? - Duration: 6:34.

-------------------------------------------

What If Thanos Was Real? - Duration: 4:34.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey.

With Avengers Infinity War fast approaching, nerds and non-nerds alike are eagerly awaiting

the arrival of Thanos, The Mad Titan.

But what if this death-obsessed superpowered villain resided not on the pages of comic

books or the silver screen, but was actually real?

Let's explore.

By the way, if comic books are your bag, and if you're watching this video I suspect

they might be, head on over to Top 10 Nerd.

It's a sister channel hosted by Kelly Paoli, Roya Destroyaa, and yours truly, where we

talk about all things nerd.

I'll see you over there.

But for now, get ready, it's time to ask the question: What if Thanos was Real?

In order to avoid similarities with other lists like What if Superheroes were Real,

this video will assume that Thanos is the only superpowered individual.

So we won't have superheroes to help us, and he won't have supervillains to help

him.

First of all, we should probably go over the capabilities of the Mad Titan, since most

people aren't particularly knowledgeable about the guy.

Thanos is the most powerful of the Eternals from the planet Titan.

He has greatly enhanced strength, speed, stamina, and healing...

He's extremely smart, and super durable; he's even survived attacks at point blank

range that would have destroyed a planet.

He can teleport thanks to his link to his techno-mystical transport chair, can manipulate

matter, and has powerful telepathic abilities.

One thing we would have going for us is that Thanos wouldn't have much help.

Based on the stipulations given at the beginning, Thanos wouldn't have any superpowered allies,

so his powerful Black Order wouldn't be a problem.

However, the many dangerous inventions and creations of Thanos could certainly have terrible

results.

For example, he's been known to make impressive and powerful clones of himself, called the

Thanosi, that he can make to do his bidding.

Usually.

He also has access to a variety of robotic drones, which serve a number of functions,

although in this case, battle drones would probably be the most relevant.

So, Thanos has his own powers, clones, and robotic drones, not to mention whatever powerful

weaponry he brings to the table.

What would happen if he attacked the Earth?

Well, one big question would be whether or not the Infinity Stones and Infinity Gauntlet

existed in this hypothetical world.

If Thanos was real but the stones and gauntlet were not, he would certainly be a threat,

but one that could be dealt with.

If he attacked the Earth, the nations of the world would need to unite to defend against

the alien threat.

Nuclear weapon production would begin in earnest, to be used against invading spaceships.

Militaries from around the world would work together to fight off the invaders.

It would be tough, and the odds would be against us, but we could potentially come out on top

if we were lucky.

Of course, if we lost the war, it's likely that the world would be decimated, and humanity

and other animal life would be extinguished.

But if we were victorious, it could begin a new era for humanity.

Perhaps the global cohesion would stick, allowing the countries of the world to unite under

a single banner.

This could prevent, or at least limit, warfare between nations on earth, allowing us to focus

on scientific and technological advancement, in hopes of colonizing new worlds.

Furthermore, the existence of Thanos and his impressive inventions could help humanity

to advance technologically.

Many of his abilities, such as teleportation, would baffle scientists, and could potentially

lead to significant advances here on Earth.

Even if we were unable to salvage his technology, the mere knowledge that something is possible

can often aid researchers to discover a method to achieve it.

Kind of like the invention of the Ansible in Ender's Game.

Of course, it's possible that we would go back to business as usual after his defeat,

with various countries squabbling over who deserves more credit, who needs more help

rebuilding, or who should have more power in the future world.

But let's stay optimistic for now.

If, however, Thanos DID have the gauntlet, optimism wouldn't getcha too far.

When fitted with the six infinity stones, the Infinity Gauntlet gives its bearer control

over Time, Space, Power, Reality, Minds, and Time.

That is to say, it makes a person able to do essentially anything they damn well please.

And the thing with Thanos is that his goal is to kill a bunch of people to impress the

female personification of Death.

With whom he is in love.

It's a long story.

The bottom line is, if Thanos had the infinity gauntlet, he would win, and we would probably

all die.

And now we return to our question: What if Thanos was Real?

Well, this would largely depend on whether or not he has the infinity gauntlet.

If he didn't have it, we could potentially win the war against him and his creations,

and it could usher in an era of peace and prosperity to Earth.

However, if he had the gauntlet, or he didn't but still won the war, humanity would be in

big trouble.

We'd probably be killed, to appease his bae Death, and Thanos would go off in search

of more lives to destroy.

So let's keep our fingers crossed and hope that he does not, in fact, exist.

Thank you for watching Life's Biggest Questions, I hope this was interesting and informative,

and maybe even inspired you to look into it further on your own.

If you liked this video, please thumbs up and subscribe to the channel down below.

While you're down there, let me know what superhero you would most like to be friends

with.

And as I said earlier, if you're looking for some nerdy videos, check out Top 10 Nerd!

Until next time, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey with Life's Biggest Questions, wishing you

the best of luck, on your quest for answers.

For more infomation >> What If Thanos Was Real? - Duration: 4:34.

-------------------------------------------

Even Kilmeade Can't Believe What Trump Is Saying On Live TV - Duration: 7:11.

AFTER

DONALD TRUMP'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL COHEN HAD BOTH HIS HOME AND HIS

HOTEL RAIDED BY AUTHORITIES, THERE WAS THIS WHOLE ISSUE

INVOLVING DONALD TRUMP AND ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE.

IS

DONALD TRUMP AND MICHAEL COHEN PROTECTED BY THE NOTION OF

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE CONSIDERING WHAT THE AUTHORITIES

HAD MAINTAINED, MANAGED TO TAKE DURING THIS RAID, THE EVIDENCE

THEY WERE ABLE TO COMPILE?

THAT QUESTION IS NOW EVEN MORE UP IN

THE AIR WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE FACT THAT DURING DONALD TRUMP'S

INTERVIEW WITH FOX AND FRIENDS, HE SAID OVER AND OVER AGAIN THAT

MICHAEL COHEN ISN'T REALLY HAS ATTORNEY.

LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE FIRST CLIP.

LET'S TALK ABOUT MICHAEL COHEN.

YESTERDAY, THROUGH HIS ATTORNEY, HE IS GOING TO BE TAKING THE

5TH.

WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT BEING THAT YOU WORKED WITH

HIM FOR A COUPLE OF DECADES?

LET ME JUST TELL YOU THAT MICHAEL IS IN BUSINESS.

HE IS

REALLY A BUSINESSMAN, FAIRLY BIG BUSINESS AS I UNDERSTAND IT, I

DO NOT KNOW HIS BUSINESS BUT THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO DO WITH

ME.

MICHAEL IS A BUSINESSMAN.

HE HAS A BUSINESS, HE ALSO PRACTICES LAW.

I WOULD SAY PROBABLY THE BIG THING IS HIS BUSINESS AND THEY

ARE LOOKING INTO SOMETHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH HIS BUSINESS.

I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS BUSINESS.

THEN WHY IS HE PLEADING THE FIFTH?

BECAUSE HE HAS OTHER THINGS.

FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND THEY'RE

LOOKING AT HIS BUSINESSES AND I HOPE HE IS IN GREAT SHAPE BUT HE

HAS BUSINESSES AND HIS LAWYERS PROBABLY TOLD HIM TO DO THAT BUT

I AM NOT INVOLVED AND I HAVE BEEN TOLD I AM NOT INVOLVED.

MR.

PRESIDENT --

YEAH.

HE HAS BUSINESSES.

THAT'S WHAT I GOT FROM THAT.

HE IS A BIG, BEAUTIFUL BUSINESSMAN.

THERE ARE

BUSINESSES.

BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES.

WHAT

ARE YOU DOING?

I AM NOT ON YOUR SIDE, BUT STILL, I FEEL A LITTLE

BAD FOR YOU.

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE HAS THE WORD ATTORNEY

IN IT, SO IF YOU ARE ARGUING THAT YOU ARE PROTECTED BY

ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE, YOU SHOULD NOT BE GOING NATIONAL

TELEVISION AND TALKING ABOUT HOW HE IS NOT REALLY YOUR ATTORNEY,

HE

IS A BUSINESSMAN.

THIS IS GOING TO COME BACK AND HAUNT YOU AND IN FACT, IT

HAS.

I'M GOING TO TELL YOU HOW IN JUST A MINUTE, BUT ONE

MORE CLIP.

TAKE A LOOK.

BUT ISN'T HIS BUSINESS YOUR ATTORNEY, MR.

PRESIDENT?

JUST SO YOU UNDERSTAND.

I HAVE MANY ATTORNEYS.

SADLY, I HAVE SO MANY ATTORNEYS YOU WOULDN'T EVEN BELIEVE.

HOW MUCH OF YOUR LEGAL WORK WAS HANDLED BY MICHAEL COHEN?

A PERCENTAGE OF MY OVERALL LEGAL WORK, A TINY, TINY

LITTLE FRACTION.

WHY?

WHAT ARE YOU DOING?

THIS HAS ALREADY HAD SOME

RAMIFICATIONS.

LET ME TELL YOU

HOW.

IN FACT, THEY SAY:

THAT'S THE KEY THERE, BECAUSE YOU COULD SAY THAT TRUMP'S

HIGHER

GROUND HERE IS, YEAH, HE STILL DOES LEGAL WORK FOR ME EVEN

THOUGH HE IS MOSTLY A BUSINESSMAN SO THAT LEGAL WORK

IS STILL COVERED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.

IT

IS A PRIVILEGED INTERACTION.

BUT, THE MINUTE YOU SAY IT IS A

SMALL, SMALL PERCENTAGE, THEN THAT LAST LITTLE MEMO IS KEY

WHICH MEANS THAT ONLY A SMALL, SMALL PERCENTAGE OF WHAT WAS

SEIZED IS LIKELY COVERED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE WHICH

MEANS THAT THE VAST VOLUME OF STUFF TAKEN FROM THE OFFICE IS

NOT COVERED, AND SO THE PROBLEM.

WHAT ARE YOU DOING?

AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, AREN'T THERE PEOPLE

ñ

THERE HAS TO STILL BE SOMEONE AROUND HIM WHO IS TELLING

HIM TO NOT DO THIS.

THIS IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF HIM WANTING TO AVOID THE PEOPLE

WHO WOULD SAY DON'T DO IT.

HE GOT ON THE PHONE IN THE MORNING,

HE CALLS THE FOX AND FRIENDS HOTLINE, THEY HAVE A SPECIAL

TRUMP LINE THERE AND HE JUST GETS THROUGH.

HE DOES NOT TALK

ANY OF HIS ADVISERS.

HEY GUYS, JUST YOU KNOW, I'M GOING TO BE

DOING THIS.

NO, DON'T MENTION THIS, DON'T MENTION THAT.

HE WANTS TO COMPLETELY CIRCUMVENT THEM SO HE CALLS

THE

HOTLINE AND TALKS TO FOX AND FRIENDS.

HE IS LOOKING FOR A

WAY TO KIND OF BLOW OFF STEAM AND THAT IS WHAT HE DID.

THAT

IS WHY HE WAS GOING FROM ONE ISSUE TO THE NEXT, LET ME TELL

YOU ANOTHER

THING.

HE WAS JUST GOING AND THAT MAKES HIM FEEL BETTER, BUT IF

YOU TALKED TO YOUR ADVISORS, THEY WOULD'VE SAID NO, NO.

WE ARE NOT CALLING ANY MORNING SHOW.

THE ONE THING THAT I WILL SAY IS IT WAS LIVE, SO I CANNOT GIVE

THEM CREDIT.

I WAS GOING TO SAY, AT LEAST THEY AIRED THAT

SEGMENT BUT IT IS NOT LIKE IT WAS PRETAPED.

THAT WAS A LIVE INTERVIEW.

THEY WRAPPED HIM UP.

AND IN FACT, I FEEL LIKE THEY KEPT ASKING HIM QUESTIONS IN

ORDER FOR HIM TO REDEEM HIMSELF.

BUT MR.

TRUMP, MR.

PRESIDENT, WHATEVER THEY CALLED HIM.

HOW MUCH OF THE LEGAL WORK WAS DONE BY HIM?

TRYING TO GET HIM TO SAY ACTUALLY ñ BUT HE DIDN'T REALIZE

THAT HE WAS REALLY HURTING HIMSELF BY MINIMIZING THE

ROLE THAT MICHAEL COHEN PLAYED AS HIS ATTORNEY.

IN A WAY, THEY DO HIM NO FAVORS BY SNEERING AT THE REST

OF THE MEDIA.

IF YOU WATCH THE INTERVIEW OR CAUGHT EVEN JUST

THE HIGHLIGHTS, YOU CAN SEE HOW IN A WAY THEY ARE EGGING HIM ON

UNWITTINGLY.

THEY ARE SAYING, MR.

PRESIDENT, WHAT DO YOU THINK

OF THIS JAMES COMEY BOOK TOUR AND THEY SAY JUST LIKE THAT.

THEY

SAY IT WITH A SNEER AND THIS PUTDOWN AND THAT IS LIKE RED

MEAT TO TRUMP.

HE GOES YEAH, LET ME SAY SOMETHING ABOUT HIM.

HE IS A LIAR AND THEN HE GOES OFF AND THEN ONCE HE GETS IN

THAT FEVER, HE JUST GOES.

YES HE DOES.

I DON'T THINK THEY DO HIM ANY FAVORS.

THIS ONE DEFINITELY DIDN'T DO

HIM ANY FAVORS.

NO.