Thứ Sáu, 4 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 4 2018

As I have said, it's not impossible and

we have to leave the degrees of freedom for Europeans

to choose the way we want to move forward.

We can move forward with a more intergovernmental logic

or in a more federal logic.

I prefer a direction with more federalism

But we are aware that we will never be

the United States.

Why? Because we do not share the same history,

nor the same matrix.

We are nations with a lot of traditions,

with very diverse identities.

And this multipicity

is our great wealth.

Therefore it is not impossible to see a 'United States of Europe.'

But we do not want to be a copy of the United States of America.

For more infomation >> Carlos Zorrinho answers Mariana on the United States of Europe - Duration: 0:56.

-------------------------------------------

Former U.S. attorney Joe diGenova reacts to Hannity's interview with Rudy Giuliani - Duration: 8:00.

for full disclosure as always he has done some legal work for me in the past

he and his wife Victoria attended my radio show Christmas party and we did

share drinks together and we talked and we laughed good to see you sir you too

you know so much news was made in that interview indeed and you saw the

coverage let's start there your reaction what does it say

what does it say to the American consumer about the news industry in

general in this country well I think when you take a look at the White House

Correspondents Dinner and the conduct of the people there and when you look at

the absence of coverage of something so major as your show last night it's

pretty clear Sean that you're right American journalism is dead it's dying

it's in a coffin and the fact is these people are not journalists anymore there

are people with an agenda they want to prove something they don't want to find

something out they want to say something on their own and this is an example of

it it's it's really a sad day a sad sad day Joe we've had massive surveillance

abuse unmasking abuse we've had the leaking of raw intelligent elegance

Samantha power I'm asking a person a day and then we have the bigger scandal Rudy

Giuliani is right Hillary committed felonies Hillary

obstructed justice James Comey Peter struck Lisa Paige Andrew McCabe and

Loretta Lynch they rigged that investigation then of course so they're

supposed to be Trump Russia collusion it turns out Hillary is paying a foreign

national to get use Russian sources that turn out to be debunked and then those

that false political document that dossier is using for a FISA warrant to

spy on an American associated with the Trump campaign in the lead-up to an

election they're virtually silent on the biggest abuse of power scandal in the

history of the country well I don't think there's any doubt that that

judgment you've just made is absolutely correct it is quite evident now that the

Muller probe is illegitimate this effort to attempt to interview the President of

the United States has now reached the point where there's just no

at all that the president should refuse to be interviewed by them and that's

because it's clear that the month that Muller and his team of Democratic thugs

are acting in bad faith they know that the president under Department of

Justice rules cannot be indicted they have no evidence to indict him the

office of robert muller was created by rod Rosenstein illegally there he

mentioned no crime to be investigated all of this leads to the ultimate

conclusion that the perpetuation of this investigation by Muller is doing grave

damage to the United States it's doing grave damage to United States foreign

policy it's doing grave damage to US law enforcement because of the thug-like

tactics that have been used in the mana Ford case and in the Cohen case and it

points to something that really is disturbing

after watching the Deputy Attorney General of the United States Rod

Rosenstein accused Congress of trying to extort him and others in the department

by conducting legitimate constitutional oversight I would say that between

Muller and Rosenstein and the absent Attorney General god bless him we have a

very serious crisis in American federal law enforcement oh I agree and I think

it's the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal in our history yeah I

rot Rosenstein a second not so easy wrote a letter said the FBI could never

recover if James Comey stayed at the helm so he would be a witness on that

part of it Karev also discovered that rod Rosenstein we talk about the the

FISA applications that relied on unverified uncorroborated a dossier paid

for by Hillary Clinton they never told the judge it was paid for by Hillary and

then he went on to say that if you have there are false information presented to

a FISA Court there's serious consequences isn't he implicating

himself that same statement when he said that he's not going to be extorted of

course the problem here for rod Rosenstein and he has multiple conflicts

of interest he shouldn't be supervising this case he wrote the memoranda the led

to the firing of James Comey he signed the FISA applications

he continues to know personally care about Comey and Muller

and others he should be removed from this case

this is absolutely disgraceful and now he will pretend that he is above all of

this but when all is said and done mr. Rosen Stein represents a part of the

department that I thought we had lost a long time ago when the Obama

administration administration people left office but apparently they haven't

left office so we're headed for a showdown and that is every attorney that

I know says the president should never sit with Robert Muller Andrew Weissman

his pit bull with his atrocious track record his team of Democratic donors

only and if the showdown goes down and the president says no if they won't

agree to a proper written answers to legitimate questions which I don't think

they will at this point then that means that it's likely that Robert Muller will

then subpoena the President of the United States before a grand jury this

is where it gets somewhat legally a little bit tricky let's walk down that

road what happens when and what should the response be well first of all I

think that if Muller issued a subpoena to the president it would be an

unconstitutional subpoena since he knows the president cannot be indicted and

since he knows that the president is not a necessary witness to anything that he

is investigating it is clear that he would be using the grand jury subpoena

for only one reason to get testimony from the President to use in an

impeachment recommendation report to the Deputy Attorney General that is an

illegal use of a grand jury subpoena the president should resist it they should

take it all the way to the Supreme Court because under article 2 of the

Constitution all executive power rests in the President of the United States he

had he had ultimate authority to fire James Comey and he did the wrong

decision and of course the courts can always be wrong we know that it's got to

go all the way to the Supreme Court if he issues a subpoena let me make a

prediction Muller will never issue a subpoena why because he cannot win I

disagree with some of the comments of Judge Napolitano earlier about the fact

that that Muller will win ultimately on a subpoena Alton

let me just say this Muller will lose ultimately on a subpoena because it is

unconstitutional if it was rented and the president pled the fifth then they

would offer him immunity and then the perjury trap remains correct or not that

is apt technically correct but you cannot issue immunity to someone when

you are doing it illegally under the statute because the only reason he would

be giving him immunity would be to force testimony for an impeachment report

Muller does not have the authority to issue an impeachment report and he does

not have the authority to use a grand jury subpoena to get presidential

testimony for impeachment or any other criminal activity that never occurred

because he's dealing with the power of the president to fire people

so if Muller wants to have that fight and tie it up in the courts for six

months to a year he can do it but he will be doing a grave disservice to

himself because at this point Muller has become a cross between Madame Defarge

and Inspector Javert and it's an embarrassment all right Joe to Jennifer

always appreciate you being on the program

For more infomation >> Former U.S. attorney Joe diGenova reacts to Hannity's interview with Rudy Giuliani - Duration: 8:00.

-------------------------------------------

😰THE POLICE CAUGHT US! 😰 - JKrew - Duration: 5:04.

going wrong way so you put the bagels in the air and turn off and then it toasts

it out right this year nor see anything like this

what

Kabang then what's going on through we're here

in Oklahoma City eating breakfast and then we're gonna do some sightseeing and

then we're on our way to Albuquerque New Mexico sir

sounds like your prize so this means that would have been to booth can I talk

nobody can hear me somebody's gonna look camera and back it up

yes

yes yeah Ripoff so we're at Amarillo Texas and we're at the famous the Big

Texan date place so I guess if you eat 72 ounces of steak within an hour you

get it for free if you want to try it if you eat a 72-ounce steak if you get the

steak for free that's like four pounds I'm gonna try it huh how do you wanna

try it keep 72 ounces of steak you got it for free you don't have to be scared

not a ride or anything

guys I'll take a picture go picture titties look at this chocolate cake

ready

72-ounce challenge

who came and his jade axe food he's got some yummy stays wet mashed potatoes I

got some stick to it some baked potato so I got some stay with mashed potato

and they are still going on with eating the 73 on stick 16 minutes left

we here in Albuquerque New Mexico don't really like the place we're staying

we're staying on base on the Air Force Base and I lay a little temporary

lodging which is kind of like a little home but no that's a house old base

housing is what this place is yeah probably but it's not very nice

it's good yeah it's like a little house so when you sit down tired only the boys

are up I'm tired too well we gonna end this vlog and tomorrow we'll be on our

way to Flagstaff Arizona and that's gonna be our last stop and then we'll be

in California where we gonna live so we'll be there on Friday we were gonna

stay in Flagstaff two nights but now it's gonna change to only one night

because their furnitures coming on Saturday Murli morning and we're excited

to have a house again so today's shout-out goes to

we found when tired tonight

For more infomation >> 😰THE POLICE CAUGHT US! 😰 - JKrew - Duration: 5:04.

-------------------------------------------

US Accuses China of Pointing Lasers at Its Pilots Over Djibouti - Duration: 0:57.

For more infomation >> US Accuses China of Pointing Lasers at Its Pilots Over Djibouti - Duration: 0:57.

-------------------------------------------

US Presidents Quiz | How well do you know U.S. Presidents? - Duration: 4:33.

How well do you know U.S. Presidents?

For more infomation >> US Presidents Quiz | How well do you know U.S. Presidents? - Duration: 4:33.

-------------------------------------------

Mike Pompeo Struts into State Dept. and TORCHES the Old Guard - Duration: 7:13.

Mike Pompeo Struts into State Dept. and TORCHES the Old Guard

It's Mike Pompeo's State Department now, and things are quickly changing.

Pompeo is moving fast – filling vacant senior positions and realigning the State Department

to make sure it's totally inline with President Trump's "America first" agenda.From

Washington Examiner

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is moving immediately to fill vacant senior positions at the State

Department, a task so large it has the feel of a "presidential transition" as opposed

to a hand-off from one member of President Trump's Cabinet to another, according to

Republican foreign policy experts.

"That is true in the sense that there's so many vacancies," Council on Foreign Relations

senior fellow Elliot Abrams told the Washington Examiner.

"It's really incredible how many vacancies there are.

It's more like starting fresh."Five of the nine most senior positions at Foggy Bottom

are vacant; the number was six, but Pompeo already has filled the role of counselor of

the department.

Dozens of ambassadorships are empty, while there are just five Senate-confirmed assistant

secretaries of state.

As a result, Pompeo has an unusual opportunity to shape the upper echelons of the diplomatic

corps the way he wants to, at a time when the Trump administration has multiple high-stakes

negotiations underway.

But it's also more than just an opportunity — it's a requirement for him to win over

a bureaucracy whose hostility to fired Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was a seedbed for media

controversies and clashes with congressional overseers.

At the moment, he's being received at Foggy Bottom like a breath of fresh air.He has one

piece of luck, which is that he is inevitably going to be compared with his predecessor,"

said Abrams, who served in the State Department during President Ronald Reagan's administration

and on President George W. Bush's White House National Security Council.

"So Secretary Pompeo starts way ahead of the curve.

Rather than following a very popular secretary, he follows an unpopular secretary."

Beyond the politics of getting confirmed, there have also been signs that Pompeo has

a sincere criticism of how Tillerson managed the department.

"I enjoyed working with Secretary Tillerson, I think his lack of appointees being confirmed

by this body was one of the problems, but, for whatever the reasons, there's a morale

problem," Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, told Pompeo during his confirmation hearing.

"I'm not going to ask you to repeat with me what you said in private, but I was encouraged."The

lack of political appointees under Tillerson has a number of causes, not least of which

is the hostility between Trump and much of the traditional Republican foreign policy

establishment.

Still, Pompeo was startled to learn the extent of the vacancies as he met with State Department

staff after Trump picked him to take over as the top diplomat.

When one official suggested that Tillerson had postponed some nominations until after

he finished developing a much-discussed plan to reorganize the State Department, Pompeo

dismissed the explanation.

"In my corporate life, I did two multimillion dollar [reorganizations], and that has nothing

to do with filling up slots," Pompeo said during one such meeting, according to a source

close to the White House.

Pompeo has promised to nurture State Department morale from the earliest days of his nomination

— a message that was a political necessity, given the need to win a precious few Democratic

senators to back his confirmation.

"He's already started interviewing people here at the state department for various positions,"

State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told reporters Thursday.

"He intends to interview people throughout the weekend."

His efforts could get bogged down in the Senate, due to the twin pressures of political opposition

and the congressional calendar.

"The blessing is that he gets to choose his own team," Abrams observed.

"The curse is that I think the confirmation process is going to be a big problem.

If you come in on January 20th, you have the opportunity to get everybody confirmed in

a few months, but because of the August recess and then the October election recess I think

he's going to have trouble getting everybody confirmed before mid or late fall."

In the meantime, Pompeo is waging an effective public relations campaign directed at the

State Department personnel.

"I will get to as many parts of this organization as I can.

I said in my testimony that I'll spend as little time on the seventh floor — I think

it's the seventh floor, right?" he said to laughter, referring to his new office.

"I look forward to meeting just as many of you as I can get a chance to do, to learning

from just as many of you as I can, and to leading that team onto the field … I'll

see you all around the building."

To Tillerson's critics, that was a clear break with the former Exxon Mobil CEO's

style.

"Tillerson wanted to make appointments at first but started discovering that most of

the people he recommended were on the White House blacklist — so after a while he started

relying on his few political appointees in the front office and didn't care so much

about the rest of the building," one Republican foreign policy expert with knowledge of the

process told the Washington Examiner.

"For Tillerson, the career people were doing just fine, so why spend time on the issue?"

For one thing, the lack of appointees exposed Tillerson to a steady drumbeat of attacks

from congressional Democrats that he had "hollowed out" the State Department, charges amplified

by persistent leaks from current and former diplomats.

Pompeo reportedly has put a tourniquet on at least one of those vulnerabilities; he

plans to withdraw Adm. Harry Harris' nomination as ambassador to Australia, in order to send

the former Pacific commander to South Korea, according to the Washington Post.

As he tried to fill other posts, Pompeo will still have to navigate the problem of White

House hostility to Trump's erstwhile critics.

"[The president has decided] basically, 'if you opposed me in 2016 or said critical

things, then we're not going to offer you a position in this administration," said

Abrams, whose bid for the second-highest job in the State Department was nixed reportedly

due to past criticism of Trump.

"My own view is it's a mistake.

… The president needs all the talent he can get.

Any president needs all the talent he can get."

For more infomation >> Mike Pompeo Struts into State Dept. and TORCHES the Old Guard - Duration: 7:13.

-------------------------------------------

US Air Force B-1B Bomber Makes Emergency Landing - Duration: 0:55.

For more infomation >> US Air Force B-1B Bomber Makes Emergency Landing - Duration: 0:55.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Navy continua operações para desencalhar caça-minas - Duration: 2:23.

For more infomation >> U.S. Navy continua operações para desencalhar caça-minas - Duration: 2:23.

-------------------------------------------

World War 3: US troops SECRETLY engaged in Saudi Arabia's vicious fight in Yemen - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:55.

World War 3: US troops SECRETLY engaged in Saudi Arabia's vicious fight in Yemen

THE US Army Special Forces have been secretly engaged in the brutal civil war in Yemen,

aiding Saudi Arabia fight the Zaidi Shiite Muslim rebels who currently control the capital

and regularly fire missiles at Saudi Arabia, it has been revealed.

A team of around a dozen Green Berets were sent to Saudi Arabia's border with Yemen

in December 2017 after Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reportedly asked

the US to help the country locate and destroy Houthi ballistic missile launch sites, according

to United States officials and European diplomats.

The New York Times reported US troops have also been engaged in training the Saudi army

to secure its border with Yemen in order to prevent further attacks against the country.

This contracts official Pentagon statements, which note that the US military assistance

to the Saudi-led campaign in Yemen is limited to intelligence, logistics and aircraft refuelling.

Gen. Joseph L. Votel, the Head of United States Central Command, confirmed this official line,

stating: "We are authorised to help the Saudis defend their border.

"We are doing that through intelligence sharing, through logistics support and through

military advice that we provide to them."

However Virginia Senator Tim Kaine and member of the Armed Services Committee criticised

the action, saying: "The mission is a purposeful blurring of lines between train and equip

missions and combat."

He noted there had been virtually no public debate on the issue, and called for a new

vote in Congress on the authorisation of military force in war zones, or war powers legislation,

as used by the former three successive Presidents.

The US's deployment of ground troops to the region is nevertheless a signal of the

West's increasing assistance of Saudi Arabia in its fight against the Houthi rebels.

Michael Maloof, former senior security policy analyst for the Secretary of Defence in the

US, commented on US engagement saying: "The US in Yemen is supposed to be going after

Al-Qaeda.

"Instead they got sucked in to assisting the Saudis because the claim is they're

the Houthis backed by the Iranians.

"That then makes it a slippery slope, and opens the US up to greater involvement than

they intended.

"What the Trump administration lacks is a strategic plan for the Middle East.

What is its ultimate goal?

And that has not yet been defined."

This comes after US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo last Sunday reiterated the threat from

Iran, and accused the country of supporting the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

He said: "Iran destabilises this entire region.

"It supports proxy militias and terrorist groups.

It is an arms dealer to the Houthi rebels in Yemen."

Mr Maloof also believes Saudi Arabia's demand for US assistance in the region is a means

of shoring up Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's government and avoiding internal political

insecurity.

He said: "The US is helping Saudi Arabia perpetuate an external threat - namely the

Houthis and Iran - in order to deflect attention away from Saudi Arabia's domestic problem,

which is the potential for a coup."

For more infomation >> World War 3: US troops SECRETLY engaged in Saudi Arabia's vicious fight in Yemen - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

South Korea's top office denies reports of Trump U.S. forces reduction review - Duration: 1:57.

Weeks ahead of the maiden meeting between the leaders of Washington and Pyongyang, there

are reports of President Trump considering options to reduce the number of American troops

stationed in South Korea.

Seoul's top office dismissed such reports.

Kwon Jang-ho has our top story.

Seoul's Presidential office has dismissed reports that U.S. President Donald Trump had

requested plans to reduce American troop numbers in South Korea, describing them as 'not true'.

The Blue House's senior press secretary Yoon Young-chan released a statement on Friday

saying that President Moon's national security adviser Chung Eui-yong, who is currently in

Washington, had discussed this report with a key member of the U.S. National Security

Council... who flatly denied it, calling it "groundless."

The Pentagon refused to confirm the report, but a spokesperson said, "The Department of

Defense's mission in South Korea remains the same" and that their "force posture has not

changed."

The New York Times on Thursday quoted several unnamed officials, who said Trump had ordered

the Pentagon to draw up such plans.

The review is said not to be intended as a bargaining chip for North Korea's denuclearization

in Trump's upcoming summit with Kim Jong-un, but it is being considered as an option if

a peace treaty on the Korean peninsula is reached.

Although the sources declined to confirm whether Trump was considering a full withdrawal, they

said it was unlikely.

Trump has long criticized the costs of stationing the 28-thousand-500 troops in South Korea,

saying that Seoul needs to pay more towards those costs.

In March he even suggested during a fundraising speech that he wanted to pull out troops in

order to balance out the trade deficit.

Currently South Korea pays around 820-million dollars a year towards troop costs, about

half of the total cost of stationing U.S. forces on the peninsula, but that amount is

expected to increase with Seoul and Washington currently in negotiations over a new deal.

Kwon Jang-ho, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> South Korea's top office denies reports of Trump U.S. forces reduction review - Duration: 1:57.

-------------------------------------------

Swearing-in Ceremony for U.S. Ambassador to the Organization of American States Carlos Trujillo - Duration: 16:28.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, good afternoon.

And on behalf of President Trump and the First Family, it's my privilege to say, welcome

to the White House.

And welcome to the swearing-in of the 20th United States Ambassador to the Organization

of American States, Carlos Trujillo.

(Applause.)

Before I begin, let me just speak a few words from my heart about a tragic incident that

occurred earlier today.

I wanted to take a moment to address the crash involving the Puerto Rico Air National Guard

C-130 that went down outside Savannah, Georgia.

First responders are on the scene.

We will continue to monitor developments.

But allow me to express the deepest sympathies of the First Family and my family, to all

the families of these brave Americans, and to all the courageous airmen who serve with

them in the Puerto Rico National Guard.

You are all on our hearts and will remain in our prayers.

And thank you all for being here for this special occasion.

And, Carlos, I'd like to begin today by welcoming your wonderful family, without whom

I'm sure you would not be standing here today.

So join me in welcoming our new ambassador's wife Carmen, and Carlos, Isabella, Juan Pablo,

and Felipe.

Give them a round of applause.

(Applause.)

And Isabella just proved that she is the daughter of a new United States Ambassador, because

she just named all 45 Presidents.

(Laughter.)

Wonderful job.

I'm very proud of you.

I also want to recognize all the members for your extended family who are here with us

today.

I know how proud they are.

Under President Donald Trump, the Western Hemisphere is a key priority for the United

States of America because the security and prosperity of our region directly affects

the security and the prosperity of the American people.

And our new Ambassador, Carlos Trujillo — the President has chosen a principled leader who

we know will ably represent the United States and our interests at the Organization of American

States.

Carlos, you bring to this new role a wealth of experience and a proven record of service

to this nation.

Growing up in Florida, the son of Cuban parents, you've seen firsthand how the fortunes of

our neighbors across the wider region influence our own nation.

Your hometown of Miami, known as the Gateway to the Americas, is in every sense a melting

pot of different cultures and traditions.

It reflects the rich tapestry of the Western Hemisphere.

For the better part of a decade, you served the good people of your city and state.

Graduated from law school.

You spent four years as Assistant State Attorney in the Miami-Dade County State Attorney's

Office.

From there, you founded your own legal practice.

But in 2010, you stepped up once more to represent your hometown, and you've served with distinction

in the Florida House of Representatives ever since.

From the first time he met you, President Trump recognized your leadership and for the

past few months, as a reflection of that, you've served as a special advisor at the

U.S. Mission to the United Nations.

And now you've taken a much larger role — a role that's vitally important to the

life our nation, in our hemisphere, and in the world.

The Organization of American States, which celebrated the 70th anniversary of its founding

only two days ago, brings together the United States and essentially every nation from across

the Western Hemisphere.

In this forum, it will be your responsibility to represent our nation and to forge stronger

partnerships in the pursuit of America's interests.

This is of vital importance to our administration.

Two weeks ago, you and I first met in Lima, Peru at the 8th Summit of the Americas, where

I spoke to the members of the Organization of American States about the United States'

priorities for the region.

I'll be reiterating that message, alongside you once again, at OAS headquarters this coming

Monday.

Under President Trump, as you know, Carlos, the United States seeks to forge stronger

and more balanced trade relationships across the region.

We believe the spread of prosperity beyond our borders benefits our people and benefits

our hemisphere.

We've already made good progress in recent months with many of our allies across the

region, and we look forward to working with you to continue to advance America's economic

interests.

We also seek to strengthen our security partnerships in the Western Hemisphere.

The interconnected dangers of illegal drugs, illegal migration, human trafficking, rising

crime increasingly threaten the wellbeing of our people.

And so we are committed, and it will be much of your task, to work with our allies across

the region to root out corruption — the corruption that spreads misery and instability

and compromises the values of this hemisphere of freedom.

And finally, the United States is committed to see to it that this is a hemisphere of

freedom.

As you know, the Charter of the Organization of American States reads, "The historic

mission of America is to offer…a land of liberty."

The Western Hemisphere has made great progress toward this goal.

But as we all know, we still have much work to do.

In recent weeks, the government of Nicaragua has brutally repressed its own people by raising

their voices in peaceful protest.

In Cuba, the Castro name may be fading, but its legacy of tyranny lives on and hangs over

that country like a cloud, darkening the future of all who call that island home.

And in Venezuela, under the rule of the dictator Nicolás Maduro, a once-flourishing democracy

has disintegrated into dictatorship.

And what was once perhaps the most prosperous nation in South America has become one of

its poorest.

In light of these many challenges, President Trump has made our nation's policy clear.

We will stand with all who yearn for liberty and we will stand up to their oppressors.

(Applause.)

Carlos, you were along with me at the Summit of the Americas when the President had me,

just a few short weeks ago, communicate his vision for achieving our goal of a hemisphere

of freedom.

And we know that that vision that will guide your work, as you take on the responsibilities

to represent the United States at the Organization of American States.

And President Trump and I have full confidence that, given your integrity and given your

leadership and given your abilities, that you'll do just that, and advance the interests

of America, and the interests of freedom, and the prosperity and security of our people.

With your voice at the Organization of American States, with the leadership of President Donald

Trump, with the support of the good people of this nation, and freedom-loving people

all across this hemisphere, we know the best days for the new world are yet to come.

So now it is my privilege to administer the oath of office.

So if you want to bring up this big, beautiful family; place your left hand on the Bible;

and raise your right hand, we'll do that right now.

(The oath is administered.)

(Applause.)

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Ladies and gentlemen, it is my honor to introduce to you the United

States Ambassador to the Organization of American States, Ambassador Carlos Trujillo.

(Applause.)

AMBASSADOR TRUJILLO: Thank you, Vice President Pence.

It's truly an honor to be here before a lot of my friends and family today, and especially

with you administering the oath.

It really means a lot to me and a lot to my family.

We really, really appreciate it.

Thank you.

A good friend of mine once told me that elections have consequences.

And I think there's nothing — no story that's really resonated with me more personally

than that saying.

And he happened to tell me that in about 2016.

And if you look back in 2016, the state of our country, it was the first time in the

history of America in which people feared that their children would be worse off than

themselves.

And it's something, as I raise my young family, I've really thought about.

And I watched the presidential election cycle more than any one I've seen in the past,

and seeing the campaign of President Trump and now Vice President Pence.

And it's easy to forget where we were at that time in history.

The economy was crashing, people lacked consumer confidence.

And if you looked specifically at the Western Hemisphere, where we were, we were entering

into a Iran deal that the majority of Americans rejected.

We weren't standing with the people of Venezuela.

And our own President was down in Cuba shaking hands, eating hotdogs, and celebrating a baseball

game with a dictator who tortured and imprisoned political prisoners and dissidents throughout

many years.

And then the election happened, and America had a renewed faith.

America had leaders that cared.

And just seeing my grandparents, that are both present here today, they left that.

Imagine being, towards the end of your life — and imagine all those people that left

in refuge, whether they were Cuban or Venezuelan or any other part of the world, and really

thinking, "Was all this struggle in vain?

Is America really going to turn its back on human rights?

Is America really going to turn its back on democracy?"

And right out of the gate, this new administration said, "Absolutely not.

That's not who America is, and that's not what we will stand for."

And you look at the successes that we've had since then.

As I was approached about applying to become an ambassador and — really, the largest

professional honor I've had in my life — they asked me, you know, "Why would you do this?

And why would you want to do it?"

And it's not just being an ambassador.

It's being an ambassador for this administration.

It's being an ambassador that's going to stand up for human rights; being an ambassador

that's going to stand up for democracy; being an ambassador that's going to sit

across the table, whether it's at the OAS or anywhere else, and say that the American

people will always stand on the side of justice and liberty.

(Applause.)

And I can tell you, Vice President Pence, I've never felt more proud than sitting

there in Lima — and as we're sitting in the room, it's a plenary of all these different

leaders from all across the Western Hemisphere.

And you hear people — Evo Morales and some of these people — just attacking American

democratic values.

And you see the Vice President of the United States come in and really set the message

straight: We won't stand for that.

We will always, always stand on the side of human rights.

We will always stand for democracy.

We will always fight for those principles.

I was so proud.

I couldn't have been anymore honored to just be sitting there next to the Vice President

of the United States, looking across the table and seeing the country that's called Cuba,

knowing the history of my family, knowing that my parents, my grandparents came here.

My parents came at the same age as my children who are standing next to me.

And knowing that, in just the one generation — one generation away — you could go from

coming over on a plane with the shirt on your back, working your tail off, paying your taxes,

honoring your country and God.

And in just 40 or 50 years, my grandparents are living testament that your child, your

grandchild, could be standing at this podium.

That is only in America.

(Applause.)

There's a lot of people that have helped me throughout the way and I'd really want

to thank my grandparents who are here today.

It's a real honor that they're both here, living, watching this.

My grandmother who's at home and my other one who is in heaven.

My parents, who are here, a lot of immediate friends and family.

And when you have these small events — these intimate events — you really reflect on

your life.

And I think a lot of the people here are different chapters of my life.

Some of my closet friends since when I was child.

Some of my friends that I made across the way in college.

Some of — some people I went into business with and have become very good friends.

Some people who I had the honor of serving in the Florida House with.

Some people who were supporting me, and mentoring me, and coaching me, and encouraging me throughout

my entire life.

And some new friends that I've made in my limited time working here in the Western Hemisphere.

But you're all very, very special.

And I know that I wouldn't be half the person, half the husband, half the father, half the

American that I am without your support.

And I'm really, really appreciative for that.

And lastly, I want to thank my wife.

I know when the opportunity presented itself, of moving to Washington, D.C. with four young

children and not many schooling options or anything else, not one time did she tell me,

"We can't do that."

When she said, "You could serve your country and you could honor this administration.

You could honor a country that has done so, so much for my family, in particular, and

so much for Americans and people across the world."

It was never, "No."

It was, "When can we start?"

So, Carmen — (Applause.)

Carmen, thank you.

None of this would be even worth — or possible without you.

I really, really appreciate it.

And Vice President Pence, it's really one of the biggest honors of my life to serve

in your administration.

I look forward to working diligently with that resolve and never wavering until Venezuela,

Cuba, Nicaragua, and the Western Hemisphere is free and able to enjoy the liberties and

democracies that we

all celebrate.

Thank you.

(Applause.)

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you all.

For more infomation >> Swearing-in Ceremony for U.S. Ambassador to the Organization of American States Carlos Trujillo - Duration: 16:28.

-------------------------------------------

US Navy to replace Gatling guns with LASERS ushering in FUTURE warfare - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 2:18.

US Navy to replace Gatling guns with LASERS ushering in FUTURE warfare

US Navy warships are set to replace their Gatling guns and missile launchers with laser

weapons systems that could see off most threats.

The Helios system is designed to shoot laser beams that would be more powerful than anything

seen in the US naval history.

According to the US military sources the weapons could defend against numerous threats.

He said: "We are talking about lasers that now have the power and beam quality needed

to defend against unmanned aerial vehicles, small boat threats and possible some weapons

(e.g. incoming missiles) over shorts ranges."

It would replace the Phalanx MK-15 weapons system that can perform on its own and kill

without instruction.

But, the US Navy is reportedly keen to operate its vessels without physical ammunition storage.

Naval warfare expert Mark Gunzinger from the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment

said, however, the US still needed to develop adequate electricity for the laser weapons

system.

The significant military boost comes as tensions between the US, China and Russia continue

to flare up.

US President Donald Trump recently revealed military chiefs had carried out secret tests

using so-called guided gravity nukes – further increasing the superpowers capabilities.

The 12th version of the B61 bomb was tested ahead of any deadly future wars.

Originally designed in 1963, the bomb has been modified to penetrate underground bases

and control centres.

It contains about 50 kilotons of power – roughly four times that of Fat Man, the bomb that

wiped out Nagasaki in 1945.

For more infomation >> US Navy to replace Gatling guns with LASERS ushering in FUTURE warfare - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 2:18.

-------------------------------------------

WW3 alert: US prepared to act against Beijing as tensions SOAR over South China Sea - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 2:11.

WW3 alert: US prepared to act against Beijing as tensions SOAR over South China Sea

US DEFENCE officials have warned China it will face consequences over its latest military

actions in the South China Sea.

Beijing has apparently installed anti-ship cruise missiles and surface-to-air missile

systems on three of its outposts in the disputed region, according to US intelligence reports.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said: "We're well aware of China's militarisation

of the South China Sea.

"We've raised concerns directly with the Chinese about this and there will be near-term

and long-term consequences."

Earlier, the US lodged a formal complaint with Beijing after Chinese nationals pointed

lasers at US military aircraft near a base in Djibouti in a number of incidents in recent

weeks.

Pentagon security chiefs has been grappling with lasers being pointed at aircraft for

decades but the recent incidents highlight US concerns about a Chinese military base

just miles from a critical US base in the east African state.

Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said: "They are very serious incidents.

"We have formally approached the Chinese government and we've requested the Chinese

investigate these incidents."

A US official said said that in a few instances, military grade lasers from the Chinese base

had been pointed at aircraft.

Djibouti is strategically located at the southern entrance to the Red Sea on the route to the

Suez Canal.

It hosts a US military base that is home to about 4,000 personnel, including special operations

forces, and is a launch pad for operations in Yemen and Somalia.

For more infomation >> WW3 alert: US prepared to act against Beijing as tensions SOAR over South China Sea - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 2:11.

-------------------------------------------

US reportedly wants China to lower trade deficit - Duration: 0:51.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and other delegates reportedly presented China

with a laundry list of economic complaints and demands this week while they were in the

country discussing trade.

The Wall Street Journal reports one of the larger asks on the list is a request that

China cut its trade deficit with the U.S. by $200 billion by the end of 2020.

That's twice what the Trump administration reportedly asked of China in March.

The Trump administration also reportedly demanded that China cut tariffs on U.S. imports and

that the country not retaliate if the U.S. imposed trade restrictions on China.

The trade talks ended Friday, and Mnuchin said the two countries were "having very good

conversations."

China's official news agency said both sides agreed to some things but that "relatively

big differences" remain.

For more infomation >> US reportedly wants China to lower trade deficit - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

South Korea's top office denies reports of Trump U.S. forces reduction review - Duration: 1:56.

Weeks ahead of the maiden meeting between the leaders of Washington and Pyongyang, there

are reports of President Trump considering options to reduce the number of American troops

stationed in South Korea.

But according to our Kwon Jang-ho, Seoul's top office flatly dismissed such claims.

Seoul's Presidential office has dismissed reports that U.S. President Donald Trump had

requested plans to reduce American troop numbers in South Korea, describing them as 'not true'.

The Blue House's senior press secretary Yoon Young-chan released a statement on Friday

saying that President Moon's national security adviser Chung Eui-yong, who is currently in

Washington, had discussed this report with a key member of the U.S. National Security

Council... who flatly denied it, calling it "groundless."

The Pentagon refused to confirm the report, but a spokesperson said, "The Department of

Defense's mission in South Korea remains the same" and that their "force posture has not

changed."

The New York Times on Thursday quoted several unnamed officials, who said Trump had ordered

the Pentagon to draw up such plans.

The review is said not to be intended as a bargaining chip for North Korea's denuclearization

in Trump's upcoming summit with Kim Jong-un, but it is being considered as an option if

a peace treaty on the Korean peninsula is reached.

Although the sources declined to confirm whether Trump was considering a full withdrawal, they

said it was unlikely.

Trump has long criticized the costs of stationing the 28-thousand-500 troops in South Korea,

saying that Seoul needs to pay more towards those costs.

In March he even suggested during a fundraising speech that he wanted to pull out troops in

order to balance out the trade deficit.

Currently South Korea pays around 820-million dollars a year towards troop costs, about

half of the total cost of stationing U.S. forces on the peninsula, but that amount is

expected to increase with Seoul and Washington currently in negotiations over a new deal.

Kwon Jang-ho, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> South Korea's top office denies reports of Trump U.S. forces reduction review - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

COME HANG OUT WITH US IN EUROPE! (BandUp Update #2) - Duration: 1:16.

Hey guys, it's Anna! So you guys probably saw in my last video I was gonna be your

bass mentor or for BandUp this year. And in case you're unfamiliar with BandUp

is a global platform where we have musicians like you audition to be in the

world's best band. We've created an amazing team of mentors who are gonna

help you out throughout this entire journey and you can check them all out

on the links below. Everything taking place at the beginning from entries to

auditions are going to be online but once we choose our top 16 that's when we

head over to Europe and that's where the live auditions are gonna be. And if

you're not a musician don't worry we at BandUp are offering you guys an amazing

package. We'll be flying you and a friend out to hang out with us for the first

week of live auditions. We'll also be providing a hotel and VIP access for the

entire week. This also means you'll have a front-row seat for the first round of

live auditions. This is how to enter. One: follow me on Instagram. Two: follow one

other mentor on Instagram. And three: subscribe to BandUp's YouTube channel.

Like I mentioned previously, all the links are down below in the description

box. Thank you guys for being part of this amazing journey and helping us find

the musicians and talent of tomorrow. I love you guys and I'll see you later.

For more infomation >> COME HANG OUT WITH US IN EUROPE! (BandUp Update #2) - Duration: 1:16.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS - Two US Pilot Injured by China Lasers in Djibouti: Pentagon Say - Duration: 5:19.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS - Two US Pilot Injured by China Lasers in Djibouti: Pentagon Say - Duration: 5:19.

-------------------------------------------

US Gov. and Media Whitewash 'Reformer' Saudi Prince MBS as He Beheads Dissidents - Duration: 6:14.

It's the Real News. I'm Ben Norton.

According to politicians and pundits in the United States, Saudi Arabia's new dictator

Mohammed bin Salman is a revolutionary who will supposedly bring progressive change to

the world. In February, the top U.S. diplomat Dennis Ross published an op-ed in the Washington

Post titled, quote: "America should get behind Saudi Arabia's revolutionary crown prince."

Most major corporate media outlets have published article after article whitewashing Mohammed

bin Salman, and depicting the 32-year-old Saudi Crown Prince as a messiah. In reality,

however, the Saudi regime's brutal oppression has continued under Prince Mohammed. A recent

report by Human Rights Watch found that in the first four months of this year Saudi Arabia

beheaded 48 people, half of them for nonviolent drug charges.

Joining us to discuss the reality in Saudi Arabia is As'ad Abukhalil. As'ad is a leading

expert on Middle East politics and a professor of political science at California State University

Stanislaus. He regularly writes at his website The Angry Arab News Service. Thanks for joining

us, As'ad.

Thank you, Ben.

So can you react to the recent report? We now know that on average, every month a dozen

people in Saudi Arabia are beheaded, Half of them for nonviolent drug offenses.

It has to be said that since the Second World War, successive U.S. administrations have

consistently coddled and indulged the despotism and cruelty of the Saudi regime. This has

been a consistent manner. However, there has been an adjustment in recent years, because

the Saudi government has become far more repressive than it has ever been.

This is what people don't understand, that what this crown prince is doing is selling

what he calls reform in terms of opening up the country for foreign investment, and allowing

clowns and singers to come to Saudi Arabia. And along the same line, he has been tightening

the parameters of a l lowed speech and movement within the country, like Twitter and social

media have been restricted increasingly under this prince than they ever were before. The

freedom of the press, which never existed in Saudi Arabia, is now more abysmal than

it ever has been.

And yet, as you suggested, there is a triumvirate that is now responsible for the promotion

of the despotism of this crown prince. And we're talking about the U.S. administration

that is endorsing what ever this crown prince is doing. Second, you have large corporations

who have at stake, oil corporations, arms defense industries and so on, who are part

of selling this new crown prince to the world. And the third element is the Zionist lobby.

The Zionist lobby and its branches, Democrat or Republican, have also been promoting this

crown prince. I just looked up today, I mean, the palace of the crown prince is now a site

of pilgrimage. You see delegations after delegations of liberals, conservative, media types, think

tanks, government agencies, all flocking to Saudi Arabia at the feet of this crown prince.

I saw a delegation of from the Center for American Progress, former Clintonites, who

are now groveling at the crown prince's feet, basically.

Yeah. And what did you take of, we had seen reports of real progress in Saudi Arabia.

Of course, women are finally being allowed to drive. The fact that they couldn't in the

first place is outrageous, considering that in no other country in the world have women

been banned from driving. So there are some forms of progress, but can you respond to

those? How do you think those reflect on Mohammed bin Salman?

I mean, this is like somebody saying that I will from now on allow bread to be supplied

to the slaves that I own. I mean, these are basic rights that women are entitled to around

the world. And the definition of Islam in Saudi Arabia remains, even after the reform,

the most strict, the most misogynistic of any kind of Islamic government around the

world. There is no need to celebration or to cheer. He basically is taking certain measures

intended for Western audiences, they are not intended for the Saudi audiences. Saudi women

require and need more freedom like everybody else. They are also entitled to have a stake

in the political system, political participation. And they also need jobs. All these things

are denied to them.

But yet he basically knows that if he makes cosmetic changes that are intended for Western

audiences, and if you pay enough PR agencies and lobbying firms in Washington D.C., everybody

will be impressed, and they are.

Yeah, and then we'll have to finish up here, but of course I didn't even mention the war

in Yemen. This is the largest humanitarian catastrophe on the planet, and Mohammed bin

Salman has been overseeing the brutal bombing by Saudi Arabia of Yemen, which is the poorest

country in the Middle East. Can you briefly comment on that, as well?

Well, I think the Yemeni bloodshed has to be blamed on GCC countries, as well as on

the Western alliance that is providing not only intelligence but also military hardware

to the Saudis and the UAE, all those who are involved in this bloody war. So it is an international

war. And when we speak about the coalition, it is a coalition, and this is important in

order not to absolve the U.S., Britain, Germany, and other countries of responsibility of the

ongoing crimes there in Yemen.

Yeah, of course, we just saw in April Saudi Arabia bombed a wedding, and killed 33 people

and injured 50, mostly civilians, many of whom were children. And they used, the Saudi

military used a U.S.-made bomb in order to bomb that Yemeni wedding. But unfortunately

we'll have to end our discussion here. We were with As'ad Abukhalil, who is a professor

of political science at California State University Stanislaus. Thanks for joining us, As'ad.

Thank you very much, Ben.

Reporting for the Real News, I'm Ben Norton.

For more infomation >> US Gov. and Media Whitewash 'Reformer' Saudi Prince MBS as He Beheads Dissidents - Duration: 6:14.

-------------------------------------------

Matvei is helping to make US flag end grain cutting board - Duration: 7:13.

For more infomation >> Matvei is helping to make US flag end grain cutting board - Duration: 7:13.

-------------------------------------------

US test NUCLEAR BOMB 'four times more deadly' than Nagasaki model amid World War 3 fears - DAILYNEWS - Duration: 3:28.

US test NUCLEAR BOMB 'four times more deadly' than Nagasaki model amid World War 3 fears

THE US Air Force has conducted numerous developmental test flights of its new B61-12 guided nuclear

gravity bomb, which will be three times more accurate than the former models, a top official

declared as the US ramps up its military forces following increasing global tensions.

Lt. Gen. Jack Weinstein said: "The US Air Force has already conducted 26 engineering,

development and guided flight tests."

He added the programme was "doing extremely well".

The B61-12 bomb, which has been in development for the past seven years, will eventually

be carried by the B-2 Spirit and the future B-21 Long Range Strategic Bomber, known as

the Raider.

The 12th model of the B61 bomb, which was first designed in 1963, will feature new technological

developments compared to its predecessors.

The bomb will include underground penetration and will be able to strike fortified command

and control centres.

It will also have an explosive yield of around 50 kilotons, which is roughly four times the

power of the US's bomb used to attack Nagasaki in August 1945.

Speaking at an Air Force Association breakfast in Washington, Mr Weinstein noted the US's

progress in the development of nuclear force was also dependent on the modernisation of

current weapons and fighter jets.

Citing the B-52 Stratofortress bomber, which is capable of launching both conventional

and nuclear payloads, he noted re-engining the bomber was critical in order to keep the

jets operational into the 2050s.

Commenting on the huge task of re-engining the fleet, he said: "Every time you renovate

a house, you don't realise there's asbestos behind the wall.

"We've been talking about re-engining the B-52 for a long time.

"Am I going to sit here and say we're not going to have a problem with the re-engining?

I'm not going to say that.

"I will tell you an awful lot of work has gone into evaluating how to re-engine, what

is the best way to do it, why we decided not to do a service life extension program on

a really old engine, so the work that has been upfront.

"It's going to take constant oversight as we go through the process."

However he noted nuclear modernisation is becoming increasing manageable, as long as

defence expenditure remains constant.

He added the current funding for nuclear weapons outlined in the 2018 National Defence Authorisation

Act remains "healthy", but he conceded: "I'd like to say I want things faster and

cheaper."

He concluded: "Overall, I'm really pleased with the support we're getting from the Hill."

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét