-------------------------------------------
U.S. will be ready if North Korea summit takes place June 12: White House - Duration: 0:36.
The White House says the U.S. will be ready.... if a summit happens in Singapore on June 12th.
Take a look at what White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had to say on Friday:
"Certainly we'd like to have a meeting but the president is not just looking to have
a meeting.
He's not looking for just a cheap political stunt, he wants to get something that's a
long lasting and actual real solutions and if they're ready to do that then the United
States, as we've said before."
Sanders added that having talks would be good for the world, but even better for North Korea.
-------------------------------------------
Blue House welcomes resumption of dialogue between North Korea, U.S. - Duration: 0:25.
South Korea's Presidential Office of Cheong Wa Dae has welcomed the resumption of dialogue
between Washington and Pyongyang.
According to the Blue House spokesperson on Saturday, the fact talks between Trump and
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un are still alive, regarding the scheduled Singapore summit
on June 12th, is a fortunate development.
The spokesperson also said the Blue House will continue to closely monitor the process.
-------------------------------------------
GDPR Impact on Organizations in Canada and the United States - Duration: 10:37.
Will Canadians and Americans demand that our governments make businesses
offer privacy protections similar to GDPR? New research reveals...
GDPR impact on businesses in Canada and the United States. The is a Cyverity report and a
special edition of Threat Actions This Week. GDPR, of course, is the general
data protection regulation and it went live as of May 25th 2018. OK let's look
at the nine rights that individuals now have in Europe and the businesses need
to comply with in Canada and the United States if you are collecting processing
or otherwise using personal data from Europeans or about Europeans. So let's go
through the nine rights really quickly and then I'll just highlight some of the
real differences that we're seeing. Number one is the right to be informed. To
know what data you have about me. The right to correct my data to rectify any
errors in the data that you have about me. The right to be forgotten to ask you
to delete personal data that you have about me. The right to restrict or limit
how you use my data. The right to be notified. To let me know if you've
corrected deleted or have otherwise complied with my request. The right to
data portability. To allow me to take my data from your business somewhere else.
The right to object. To tell you to stop using my data in the way that you might
be or to stop collecting that data. The right to limit profiling. To not have my
data, the data about me, segmented into buckets based on your algorithms. OK so
what are the really big changes here because some of this we already sort of
have when we look at our own American or Canadian privacy legislation. There are
differences though. The right to be forgotten absolutely a big change and
that could be costly for organizations as you cull through your data to pull
out the historical records of customers and delete those records. The right to
date a portability. This one can't be underestimated. As
you're investing in the relationship between you and your customers that
customer has the right to remove their data from your system and bring it over
to someone else's system. In other words it's their data not your data. So that's
a pretty big change and something again not to underestimate. Now here's one that
hasn't received as much attention as I think it should have. You have the right
to limit profiling now as artificial intelligence gets better and better and
as there's new ways to correlate all different kinds of information there's
all sorts of new business models new trends that haven't even been thought of
yet when we think about how artificial intelligence is going to be
fundamentally reshaping the interaction between business and customers how it's
going to be forming new communities well as an individual in Europe I have the
right to tell you to not profile me in certain ways can the long arm of the law
of the European Union really extend across the ocean and reach my
organization well the short answer is yes a court ruling in the European Union
absolutely can take effect in Canada or the United States will a set of privacy
rights as strong as those in effect for European soon safeguard North Americans
if we take popular opinion as a guide to how lawmakers may react let's find out
what five hundred people from across the continent think this survey was
conducted as of May 23rd 2018 all right here's the question should the United
States government make businesses give you more control of your own private
data like GDP our will for Europeans and that same question was posed for
Canadians about the Canadian government the options they have are yes no or
don't know Canada I'll get to the results in just a minute let's start
with the United States only 12% say no if it wasn't for the big news of
late about Cambridge analytic ah and Facebook I'd find the sentiment
counterintuitive I thought Americans opted for less
government not quite libertarian but not this lowest twelve percent of the
population so how many Americans said yes they do want more legislated privacy
protection 42% of Americans said yes well that leaves 46% a fairly large
percentage that are undecided at this point in time women tended to look
towards government involvement a little more than men interestingly by age
typically as we get older we want more government oversight say for those who
are 18 to 24 year old who stand out is a very important demographic and possibly
a leading indicator of change on the way with the amount of them who are saying
yes I do want government involvement to protect my privacy now in Canada similar
to Americans 14 percent say no thanks to government involvement in making
business protect their personal data but only 33 percent say yes now if I had to
place a bet on the results of this research in advance I would have lost
this one I would have thought Canadians would seek more government intervention
than Americans but the people of spoken another small difference is that men in
Ghana seem to slightly favor added privacy protection from an age
perspective there are some differences to the US but generally speaking the
shape of our sentiment is much the same when we're in the heart of our working
years we vote for less protection but when were younger or when were older
were likely to say look I want more protection very interesting ok so what
are these results mean overall so two things one with a large number of
undecided and number two with the younger population saying that they want
change we could very well see GDP our strength legislation coming to
North America if our politicians are reading these kind of tea leaves so
there are certainly a lot of checklists online where your organization can go to
find out what it should be looking at and the tasks it should be laying out
for itself with respect to GD P R let me highlight some of the key areas that
your organization will want to look at one is don't collect extraneous personal
data well that goes without saying at least it should with respect to existing
privacy legislation delete personal data when no longer needed
same thing know that personal data includes metadata like geolocation data
or IP addresses remember the scandals around the NSA data that was leaked well
that was all about metadata and that can identify who a person is you have to get
consent and this goes beyond what we saw from can spam and from a casul
perspective along the same vein be very clear about privacy and your privacy
policy make that obvious make it clear for individuals really to understand
that know where personal data is this actually may be a little bit of a
challenge for organizations who aren't sure where all the personal data is that
they collect or even if they're collecting data on or about Europeans
conduct a threat risk assessment it's good documentation to have and frankly
it's really the only way to know if your security technologies and processes are
actually working demonstrate strong IT security predominantly gdpr is about
confidentiality of data in other words that that data hasn't been revealed to
people and about the integrity of that data as well in other words that the
data is correct the data hasn't been corrupted but gdpr does also mention
availability and what that means is that if you're collecting personal data you
have a platform that an individual is used to using and now that platform is
offline there could be consequences for that when we look at the fines related
to GDP are however most of those seem to be related to confidentiality and
integrity so we'll have to see how the of
availability peace plays out have an incident response plan that you should
just have anyway but seeing as you only have 72 hours to notify individuals of a
data breach there's no way you'll be able to do that if you don't have a plan
in place next point is to really just document every effort to be compliant
with gdpr write everything down there should be
one of the primary things that you do create a full or part-time Data
Protection Officer you appoint someone who is going to be a data protection
officer and this can be a part-time role depending on the company now it could be
a big deal depending on how much data you collect and this could be a
department of an organization but for a lot of organizations it will be a
part-time job for somebody set workflow to handle complaints and requests know
how websites and other partners handle personal data if they're not compliant
you're not compliant either I'm David said this is a cyber t report and a
special edition of thread actions this week you can catch that podcast on
YouTube iTunes and a number of other platforms thanks for listening and let
us know how we can help you
-------------------------------------------
BADASS Sniper!!! - The Last of Us Remastered Survival Mode #16 - Duration: 33:05.
For more infomation >> BADASS Sniper!!! - The Last of Us Remastered Survival Mode #16 - Duration: 33:05. -------------------------------------------
Trump says North Korea-U.S. summit could still happen on June 12th - Duration: 2:20.
It was on... then off... and now, could it be back on again?
President Donald Trump has suggested that the North Korea-U.S. summit could happen as
previously planned... on June 12th in Singapore.
This comes just a day after Trump sent a letter to Kim Jong-un calling it off.
Our Park Ji-won has more on another remarkable turnaround.
In his latest tweet on North Korea on Friday evening, U.S. time, President Trump said (quote)
"North Korea and the U.S. are having productive talks about reinstating the summit",... and
(quote) "if it does happen, it will likely remain in Singapore on the same date, June
12th, and, if necessary, will be extended beyond that date."
Speaking to reporters at the White House earlier on Friday,... Trump also suggested the summit
could still happen on the previously-set date,... as discussions are ongoing.
"We'll see what happens.
It could even be the 12th.
We are talking to them now.
They very much want to do it.
We'd like to do it.
We'll see what happens."
Regarding a question on whether the U.S. is concerned North Korea is playing games,...
President Trump said Pyongyang is not the only one to do so.
"Everybody plays games.
You know that.
You know that better than anybody."
Senior U.S. officials are backing up the possibility that the summit could still happen on June
12th.
U.S. State Department Spokeswoman Heather Nauert said Friday that (quote) "there are
always high points and low points in diplomacy,"... and said the State Department is working on
plans going forward.
U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis also said the summit could still take place,... if diplomats
can pull it off.
In a surprise move on Thursday,...
President Trump announced that the summit was off,... citing North Korea's "tremendous
anger and open hostility" against the U.S..
Some eight hours after Trump's announcement,... North Korea's Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye-gwan
released a statement,... urging the U.S. to give more thought to cancelling the June 12th
summit.
It also said Kim Jong-un has poured his efforts into summit preparations,... adding the North
is willing to sit down face-to-face with Washington at any time, and in any format.
Park Ji-won, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
Summit Between North Korea, U.S. Not Dead Yet - Duration: 1:49.
For more infomation >> Summit Between North Korea, U.S. Not Dead Yet - Duration: 1:49. -------------------------------------------
LOU DOBBS: North Korea is willing to resolve issues with US following cancelled summit - Duration: 15:41.
President Trump canceled the North Korea summit over open hostility as he put it
from Kim jong-un and his regime however President Trump hinting the tarts could
began again if North Korea were willing to change course in harmony prosperity
and peace that bright and beautiful future can only happen when the threat
of nuclear weapons is removed no way it can happen otherwise if and when Kim
jong-un's uses to engage in constructive dialogue and actions I am waiting and
North Korea didn't wait very long inviting a handful of journalists to
observe as their nuclear site was quote-unquote dismantled we know three
explosions took place but there were no nuclear experts there no weapons experts
and those who watched from afar halfway around the globe suggesting this is all
more symbolic than practical but that's the sort of blather that you hear from
people who don't know anything some believe the Hermit Kingdom may have
sites that they're not disclosing and in 2008 they did blow up a cooling tower
negotiations fell through nonetheless joining us tonight congressman Lee
Zeldin he serves on the House Foreign Affairs Committee he calls he's calling
for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate an absolutely
corrupted Department of Justice and and FBI leadership good to have you here
Congress great to be back it didn't take hours for the North Koreans to respond
and now they want to talk after the president said there will be no June 12
summit your thoughts it's important to treat our friends as our friends and our
adversaries as our adversaries understanding our adversaries do not
respect weakness the only respect strength and when we say you can't
be silent it's not because we want Wars but it's because we want to make sure
that we're able to prevent it and the president in approaching this entire
situation North Korea knows that the North Koreans and these other nations
will only respect the United States and President Trump if we go into it from a
position of strength and our hand just became stronger with the president
showing a willingness not only to walk away from the summit if the North
Koreans continue with these antics and the Chinese possibly as well but
military force is an option as and with that being a real option I think
strengthens his hands as far as diplomacy and the economic pressure and
the president conveyed today I thought absolutely no suggestion whatsoever of
anger he was constrained even as he basically was threatening the North
Koreans with their own destruction and managed at the same time to validate
again the terms of a summit which are very straightforward this president said
it and said it again and again today you will Denis clear eyes and that is
non-negotiable and remember where we were just a few years ago President
Obama negotiating with Iran and negotiating from a position of weakness
red lines getting crossed Iran using rhetoric like calling us the Great Satan
chanting death to America still legally test-firing intercontinental ballistic
missiles and you remember when they took our sailors and embarrass them with the
photos and videography or suspension and secretary Kerry said thank you that was
his response not anymore and President Lee the congressman is not
just using an aside there that is it an exact quote from Secretary of State
Kerry thank you thank you president Trump though is showing that this is not
that he's setting red lines he's being strong but he was not provocative last
August when he was talking about fire and fury the fact is of North Korea
attacked the United States they we met with fire and fury and while we're here
in our any of our allies and we're here in our country and we're asking is Kim
jong-un crazy enough is he to do this or do that
I think Kim jong-un was over North Korea saying no and I think Donald Trump is
crazy enough to attack me and what by making that military option look real
and with the state of the economy and even in last August when the ambassador
Haley and and president Trump they were able to get a unanimous UN Security
Council resolution passed that even China and North Korea voted for you know
you've said President Trump is crazy enough I think I think he is saying that
III I think Kim jong-un right now and his regime understand that this
president is smart enough determined enough and courageous enough to do
exactly what he is intimating and I think that I've never seen a clear
example of the man's I collected cool are his his constraint than today
because he had to be furious in in some measure he did not in in any way in any
way I allow anyone to see that anger that he might possess I would say almost
surely possesses but I think he has made his mind up and I think that's got to
scare the hell out of the Koreans and by the way I think it scares the hell out
of Shane ping and I think he's learning a lesson here perhaps had more profound
lesson than even Kim jong-un I will I will say this you'll first off if Kim
jong-un is known to be homicidal in that suicidal and I think that's part of his
calculation as well and without disclosing any confidence I yesterday I
traveled president Trump to Long Island and there were a couple of times what
was with him that broached the topic of North Korea and all I'll say is this he
knows exactly what he's doing he is thinking through this is
incredibly important to him but it's very deliberate and he's calm cool and
collected and strong and I believe that his decision today was necessary to let
the North Koreans know that they are not in charge they're not there they don't
they're not going to role the United States the way that the Iranians rolled
the United States three years ago I think this president made that clear in
his first year in office I really do he served notice that he is not in any
part the in the order of succession of the incompetent presidents that we've
had in office think about this three presidents in a row three of the worst
presidents we've had in our country's history that is Clinton that is Bush and
that is Obama and this country is very very lucky that this is our president
now right and he understands the art of the deal
he also understands the need to prioritize America first in these
negotiations and he's also talking about how important this is for the world he's
exercising leadership on the world stage I remember going to Israel in August of
2015 meeting with Bibi and in saying you know like this guy was reluctantly in
the leader of the free world we don't have one right now up right now we have
a leader of the free world and he's our president absolutely congressman Louie
Zelda good to have you with great to be back thank you James clapper now claims
the Russians swung the 2016 presidential election for Donald Trump
the former Obama Intel chief supposed bombshell comment contradicting the the
view of the entire intelligence community's formal assessment released
after they thoroughly investigated the matter last year in joining us now
former FBI assistant director great American and terrific terrific friend of
this broadcast good to see you James James Kallstrom nice to be yellow let's
say I mean I can't even believe the nonsense
unreal from the former NDI yeah does he forget what his testimony was before the
Congress I said I guess he does and I don't think it matters to him one whit
whether he's good an ally or not yeah the man needs some psychiatric help
and what about James call me it call me as you know we've been talking about at
least I have among others for about a year and a half now and call me mm-hmm
and he he's the guy with the biggest attitude and the biggest he puts himself
on this huge pedestal the ego is just unbelievable yet he has no common sense
and and you know to think that he could pull off this whitewash of a fraudulent
investigation on Hillary Clinton when the president of Obama himself on at
least two occasions said there's no evidence against her she's she's done
nothing wrong I mean you'd have to be a moron not to not to know that that was
just a phony thing from the very beginning yeah not to understand the dog
whistle from the president about his former Secretary of State he couldn't
have been clearer I agree with you yeah I and and for the most obvious I
think the most obvious pay-for-play scandal in this country's history is the
Clinton Foundation and for the FBI to permit itself to conclude that they're
not going to have an investigation then try to sell the nonsense that don't
worry we got it under control out in the Little Rock well it wasn't the FBI
wasn't investigating the Clinton Foundation I've called it you know a big
a RICO case than the Mafia right quite frankly you know more sophisticated more
money involved you know and it wasn't that the FBI agents didn't want to
investigate it it's you know these five or six or twelve or fifteen or twenty or
whoever who this number of secretary and then why should there be a much larger
out that we maybe it's 50 but I'll tell you right now Lou it's not the thousands
of agents that are out there there I hear from tons and tons of these people
they are so upset about what is going on you know and some of your guests on this
show who I think I I respect you know I've talked about turning over the FBI
to the Marshal Service I think that's really a crazy idea everyone has their
own idea but that is not anything that should ever happen we need new
leadership we need and discipline we need to get rid of the top-ranking
people in there right now what I bring a leader in there that can motivate and
discipline the agency that's what needs to happen right here's what I think and
I like that your judgment about the future of the FBI as an institution yes
I personally believe it depends on how many agents step forward and say under
subpoena what truly happened if there isn't that residual within the rank and
file of FBI I think that the institution is
doomed in and by the way I've got and sitting here with the greatest respect
and affection for you I have to say that if they don't step up here that they
deserve that institution to be absolutely swept aside well I believe
the vast majority of those that have knowledge that have a reason that step
forward other than that's what they see on television every day yeah and that's
a small number because call me you know those other sycophants brought that
investigation and those other investigations close hold you know the
agents themselves in the field offices it was all taken away I mean they called
up the New York office and shut down their Clinton Foundation investigation
they shut it down on Little Rock it's not the agents that are out there it's
this group of people that perpetrated this fraud on on the country and thought
they could get away with it I mean it's just that it's been unbelievable what
we're doing to a fine institution I spent half my you know most of my adult
life there you know I know it's I know what people go to work for every day
there in the FBI well you know and it's a shame that this has happened that
we've put a series of bad leadership and I'll include Bob Muller in that
absolutely I mean Muller and and call you as a
disaster both working in the high and most highly politicized administration
they politicized the Justice Department the FBI the Internal Revenue Service the
list goes on Obama know part bomber government they do police Obama
politicized the entire government yeah you know and he filled it with
sycophants and the people would succumb to the Stockholm Syndrome and I mean
it's just a tragedy what went on you know and guys like Brennan and clapper
and call me how did you ever create how could they John ever running I mean what
of these horrible men whose exudes yeah off you all you have to do is watch the
man I know them I can tell you that's a good that's a good feeling on your part
because he said he's a really a psychopath that guy you know and all his
rantings and ravings and threatening people you know it we got to clean this
thing up resident united cluding the president of states and here we've got
the Deputy Attorney General threatening people I mean what is this
this here's a guy who's signed one of the renewals on the on the fraudulent
Pfizer application I mean what is going on here and today we we don't even know
whether the gang of eight the the heads of the House Intelligence and oversight
committees actually got to see the documents of origin leading to the
special counsel we don't we don't know whether they were just briefed about it
or were they had a nose patted on the head and I mean this conspiracies been
working for a long long time yeah you know in this getting Donald Trump
whenever there was an inkling that he was going to win this thing you know
there was a there was a fifth column a strong fifth column then and they're
still there today there's still there today I keep saying to folks and I will
continue to say to folks you know it's not just that this president has been
had the guts and the intelligence to drive this but to imagine what he was
Stan's every day yeah and has had to withstand from from the moment he ran
for this with Nona for 43 years and and there were him to stand up like he had
this guy and he's never rate he's never not gonna stand up oh no matter what
happens to these fools i I have I believe that wholeheartedly yeah yeah
it's great to see and God bless you lou dobbs god bless you James Kallstrom
thanks for being here
you
-------------------------------------------
Kennedy Former CIA military analyst Tara Maller discusses Can the US trust Nor - Duration: 12:13.
CIA chief nominee Gina Haskell has some congressional grill marks on her
backside and while a lot of senators had some pointed questions for the
dominatrix of doom she'll probably be confirmed as our nation's top spy
California senator Kamala Harris did her best future presidential candidate
impression by pointedly asking whether torture is immoral watch the fur fly
between these two gals on this exchange do you believe in hindsight that those
techniques were immoral senator what I believe sitting here today is that I
support the higher moral standard we have decided to hold ourselves exam sir
the question senator I think I've answered the question you've not do you
believe the previous techniques now armed with hindsight do you believe they
were Imam yes or no senator I believe that we should hold ourselves to the
moral standard outlined in the Army Field menu
hiding behind the old Army Field Manual how convenient
there were senators who question the wisdom of relitigated mistakes from 17
years ago and to them I would say we're still very much living our post 9/11
blunders in Iraq and especially in Afghanistan it would be lovely but naive
to think those bad choices were safely destroyed like so many damaging
videotapes they still actively manifest in the demented brains and damaged souls
of terrorists who have proliferated despite heavy-handed and poorly managed
torture torture was not moral 17 years ago
and despite hostile ah shucks silver-tongued promises it's not a far
stretch to think a CIA director all too familiar with such reprehensible
practices could put us on an enhanced handcart to hell we're still stinking up
the Middle East and smoldering costly Wars torture doesn't work and pointing
that out doesn't make you a big fat softie and appointing a career spy to
have the CIA in no way guarantees our dirty laundry and dark secrets we'll
stay dead and buried forever huge day in politics tomorrow three big primaries in
West Virginia Mountain Mama Indiana and Ohio they represent some of
the gops best hopes friends seeding incumbent Democrats in the president won
all three states in the 2016 race but the one getting the most attention of
course is West Virginia President Trump tweeted to the great people of West
Virginia we have together a really great chance to keep making a big difference
problem is don blankenship currently running for senate can't win the general
election in your state no way remember Alabama vote representative Jenkins or
Attorney General Morrissey Blankenship responded shortly after with the
statement saying quote I am Trump e'er than drunk okay buddy so how is this all
gonna shake out and what will it mean for November with me now CEO of American
majority and former presidential writer for George W Bush Ned Ryan is here along
with Fox News political analyst and former candidate DNC chair jammu green
welcome to you both thanks Kennedy hi hi Jamil good to see you okay so Ned I will
start with you don blankenship in some polls has a
little bit of an advantage over Evan Jenkins and mr. Morrissey stop me oh ho
ho stop me stop me if you think you've heard this one before oh my gosh I I'm
saying a prayer the Republican voters in West Virginia don't shoot themselves in
the foot tomorrow the last thing we need Kennedy is a rerun of Alabama where we
had a deep red state we had a chance to win a Senate race and we end up putting
a deeply flawed candidate ended up losing the seat and and the most
important thing that that voters in West Virginia need to understand when they go
to the polls tomorrow they need to have three words in their heads Kennedy
judges judges and judges Trump's great legacy could be reshaping the federal
bench by appointing young Federal Society judges who can be on the bench
for a generation deconstruct the administrative state but unless the
Republicans keep the Senate he can't do that and they can't keep the Senate if
they put up terrible deeply flawed candidates in the fall elections and so
I hope especially in West Virginia they understand Don Blankenship cannot be the
nominee I'll take Morrissey I'll take Jenkins it
cannot be Blankenship because just just a few weeks ago Manchin was down by nine
points to a generic Republican this is one of the best opportunities
kids have to take a seat don't screw it up tomorrow voters and West Virginia
please yeah and and I mean Alabama obviously crimson red now has a
Democratic senator because of you know similar candidacy issues Jammu but you
say the Democrats are wise to not count their chickens before they hatch there's
still a lot that could happen between now and the midterms what did Democrats
have to do right well certainly start by not like resting on our laurels I think
if you look back two years ago Democrats never would have imagined being in this
position where we are closer to being able to take back the Senate as well as
how good it looks in the house but we can't get ahead of ourselves but oh my
gosh thank goodness Donald Trump is learning
can we just stop and appreciate that for a second that he understands that the
threat that blankenship poses to the Republicans in the Senate so I think
that's great for America but Republicans Kennedy when did criminality become like
a prerequisite for nomination in red states this is crazy that the
front-runner is Virginia that's a really good point people who Satan's yeah and
and people and can he vote for himself and Don Blankenship is saying you know
don't tell us how to run our state it's like now if you want it if you want to
keep the Senate and you're a Republican let someone tell you not to nominate one
of these Yahoo's last word Ned yeah yeah no I'm gonna state very something very
obvious a CAPTA Captain Obvious moment Kennedy
you probably shouldn't nominate somebody to be your candidate in the general
who's been in prison sometime in the last ten years and so I hope that people
understand like him secret on this reform but this guy he brought his gourd
Jamilah net to both ears he's he's checking into his parole officer still I
start from the principle that I don't trust North Korea and I think that's
probably a good place for the president to be
they're engaged in what I call accommodation this is a period of
accommodation you look at the history of dealing with North Korea we've gone
through periods of provocation and periods of accommodation and even we try
to work with them when there are these periods of accommodation but ultimately
we found out that we couldn't trust them can we trust Kim jong-eun little
Rocketman ahead of these nuclear talks even after the prisoner release former
CIA military analyst and spoke spokesperson for the counter extremism
project is here Tara Mahler Tara what do you make of these developments and the
hostages being released from North Korea sure the hostages being released is a
victory it is a huge victory to get three Americans who are being detained
home that goes without saying having said that that does not mean that we
have a victory here yet in terms of negotiations it's a good-faith gesture
by the North Koreans it shows some goodwill leading up to the
talks that's what you want to see from both sides you want positive rhetoric
you'd like to see that both sides are going to the table with genuine
willingness to compromise and reach some sort of agreement but North Koreans have
proven untrustworthy before North Koreans have proven to do things that
and renege on on parts of what they claim to want to be doing so I think
that it's an irreversible measure that they took to show good faith but they
might expect something in return that we're not willing to give so it remains
to be seen how this actually impacts the developments at the summit itself well
it's interesting because Senator Schumer is warning not to use these hostages as
bargaining chips but that's what North Korea would be doing not the United
States and so far we haven't heard of any concessions given for their release
and you know you have to realize the timeline here this is all happening
before the two leaders meet supposedly in Singapore so you know Schumer says
this gives countries especially rogue regimes incentive to take American
hostages what do you think about that worry no I don't really agree with that
I think that this move in and of itself is a positive development I don't think
it necessarily translate positive developments in terms of the
negotiations in fact the North Koreans could use this for PR purposes they
could use this going into the talks to say look we did this what is the United
States doing in return we haven't seen them give us a concession they're very
you know skilled and cunning when it comes to these maneuvers on the public
stage and in terms of propaganda for their own population so I'm not saying
that that's what happened here but we have to wait and see and I think one of
the key things to look for is the trustworthiness of the North Koreans
going to these talks and we're not gonna really know that until both parties get
to the table we see the deal that may or may not be made again president Trump
has said if he doesn't think a good deal is gonna be made he may even walk out of
the talks those are his worth yourself no he's good that he will get up and
walk away so right go ahead and get it exactly so he'll get up and walk away
and the key point here is even if the North Koreans agree to denuclearize
which I'm not sure they will in terms of the definition that the United States
wants them to which would be getting rid of all their ballistic missiles getting
rid of all their nuclear materials having open in very intrusive
inspections even if they do that we have to trust that we know where all the
material is that we know where all the sites are and that they're cooperating
in terms of verification we know because of you know first-hand accounts and
certainly thousands and thousands of pages of documents from the NSA that the
United States government has the ability to pretty much spy on anyone anywhere at
any given time through a number of means so we should absolutely know where their
nuclear arsenal and the capabilities are buried and located but you know what
about giving them the ability to have nuclear energy and opening up those
labor camps so some of the the other hostages and political prisoners and you
know those who have been sentenced to a lifetime a short lifetime of brutal
labor can be free I mean I'd love to fully agree with the first portion of
your statement about the quality of intelligence on North Korea and I'm no
longer in the intelligence community and I didn't work on North Korea but North
Korea is known to be one of the most difficult cases in terms of intelligence
and the quality of the intelligence and while we might have
good insight into the nuclear materials and their missiles there are you know
competing estimates out there in terms of numbers on missiles there are
competing estimates about our knowledge of where everything is located and only
one site needs to be hidden right for the potential denuclearization deal to
be violated or for them to be cheating and also they could go back on their
word so verification is going to be key I think it was a former Secretary of
Energy under President Obama who was saying the other day normally in these
cases you say trust but verify but when you're talking about the North Koreans
you say don't trust anything and verify verify verify because they've been known
to be very deceptive and they've broken out of deals that they've signed before
again that doesn't mean we shouldn't be trying to talk that doesn't mean this is
not all positive developments no it's the things are certainly headed in the
right direction but when the right direction
we can't waltz into those meetings with a ukulele strumming Kumbaya and hope for
the best to outcome just because hope is a neat thing it's not President Obama
proved it Tata thank you so much
-------------------------------------------
North Korea still open to US talks 'at any time' - Duration: 1:24.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
I've decided to terminate the planned summit in Singapore
on June 12th.
While many things can happen and a great opportunity
lies ahead potentially, I believe
that this is a tremendous setback
for North Korea and indeed, a setback for the world.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
-------------------------------------------
The US Federal Court System: What Even ARE the Courts? - Duration: 7:08.
[♪INTRO]
If you're an engaged citizen of the US, or, god forbid, you get push notifications
of the news on your phone, you hear a lot about what our president is doing, or what
Congress isn't doing, every day, all the time.
But if that's how you're staying informed about how our government works and what that
means for you, you're only getting two thirds of the story.
I wanna talk about the federal court system—the part of out of government that figures out
how our laws apply to our real lives.
Except... what even are the courts?
How do they fall into the big picture of US government, and how did it get this way?
[♪MUSIC]
To start our journey of knowing the things we should know, let's go back to basics.
In the US we have three branches of government.
The legislative branch, or Congress, comes up with laws, the executive branch, the president,
gets to sign or veto those laws, and the judicial branch, our federal court system, interprets
what the laws actually mean.
This all comes from the Constitution – another pretty major thing that the court
is tasked with interpreting – where our founding fathers decided that there needed
to be a separation of powers because they didn't want the US to feel like
the monarchy they had just fought so hard to leave.
The idea was that if any branch tried to take a little too much power, the other branches
could be like, "Hey, that's our job.
Get back in your lane."
So Article I lays out the powers and responsibilities of Congress, Article II talks about what the
president can and can't do, and Article III says that "The Judicial Power of the
United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the
Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
Basically: we're gonna have one, big, powerful court.
And probably other courts, but we'll figure that out later.
It's the shortest, and kinda the fuzziest description of powers of all the branches
of government.
It left out all the details about who sits on the courts, and how many courts there should
even be, leaving all of that up to Congress to decide.
And like most of the American experiment, we've been making it up as we go along.
In the first ever session of Congress, lawmakers passed the Judiciary Act of 1789 which spelled
out how the whole federal court system would work.
Remember that ordaining and establishing part?
Congress figured out that one Supreme Court might not be enough for, y'know, a whole
nation, so they decided there should be three levels of federal courts, with the Supreme
Court being the highest.
That's how we got district courts.
These are the lowest level of the federal court system where trials about federal law
actually happen with one judge, a jury, witnesses, the whole deal.
There were originally 13 district courts—one for every state at the time with an extra
court in both Virginia and Massachusetts because they had bigger populations.
But now we have a lot more states, and a LOT more cases, so there are a total of 94 districts today.
If you go to district court and you don't agree with the result of that trial, you can appeal
it to the next court up, which, helpfully, is called the United States Court of Appeals.
I love it when the names make sense.
These are the 13 courts, each serving a different region, or circuit, of the US, where you can
ask higher, more powerful judges to reverse the decisions of the district court.
Appealing is kind of like asking the district court if you can, like, borrow their car and they
say no, so you go ask your other parent... the appellate court instead.
In the Court of Appeals, a panel of three judges from the region reviews your case,
and they can decide to either uphold or overturn the district court's decision.
Sidenote on the Court of Appeals—you may have also heard it called the circuit court,
and there's a reason for that.
In the original court system from 1789, the Supreme Court justices "rode circuit,"
traveling around from district to district to hear trials in lower courts, which was
kind of a lot of work because planes weren't a thing.
The Supreme Court justices were like hey, Congress, we're doing a lot of traveling
here, and we're tired, and also it's dangerous?
Like, riding the circuit court trail sounds like a really cool idea until one of your
6 judges dies of dysentery.
So in 1891 they got rid of the traveling, and took away their responsibility to hear
appeals by creating a new court above the circuit court—yep, it's the Court of Appeals again.
And in the Judicial Code of 1911, Congress moved their trials down to the district courts
and got rid of circuit courts all together.
If you go to District Court, and then appeal that decision, and then the Court of Appeals
upholds it, and you want to appeal that decision, you've got to go all the way to the Supreme
Court—the final boss of the federal court system.
The Judiciary act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court 6 justices.
Yeah, only six, we added more later.
It also decided that the Supreme Court had the ability to hear cases before any of the other
courts, known as original jurisdiction, if those cases didn't fit in the lower courts,
usually when a case was a dispute between two states.
But their most important function, and the majority of what the Supreme Court did, and
still does, is hear appeals.
When the court was first created, they were required to issue decisions on all appeals
from lower courts, but that was a lot of cases that they had to review—whether they thought
it deserved a review or not.
So, nearly 100 years after the Supreme Court was created, Congress came up with certiorari—a
system to decide which cases the court will review, otherwise they might still be hearing
cases about whether tomatoes are a fruit or a vegetable.
Yes. that was a real Supreme Court case.
Once the appellate court issues a decision, either party to that case can petition for
a writ of certiorari, or a writ of cert, asking the supreme court to review their case and telling them why
they think it deserves review.
The court gets nearly 10,000 of these petitions a year and only accepts about 100 of them.
What are some of the reasons that a justice might want to review a case?
Sometimes it's because they think the decision of a lower court—or the way they applied
the law—is something that could impact the entire country, so they want to consider it
carefully, think about all of the intended and unintended effects that application could
have, and try to get it absolutely right.
Other times they'll review a case because the appellate courts in different regions
of the country have been deciding on similar cases in different ways—so the Supreme Court
needs to step in and decide how to apply the federal law in the same way across the entire country.
But no matter why the Supreme Court takes up the case, it's a big deal.
By the time a case gets to them, it's already touched tons of smart people in the
court system, who have spent a lot of time thinking about the case, and the laws it deals
with, and what those laws should mean today.
And once those judges decide, the way they interpret those laws affects what they will
mean in the future.
Who are those judges, by the way?
And how did they get there?
We're going to talk about all the people who decide who can become a judge, which is
important because—you're probably one of them.
Stay tuned to learn exactly how the court system affects you, and how you can affect
the court system.
[♪OUTRO]
-------------------------------------------
Trump says North Korea-U.S. summit could still happen on June 12th - Duration: 2:13.
Our top story this afternoon...
A summit between North Korea and the United States could be back on.
U.S. President Donald Trump says it could even happen as previously planned -- on June
12th in Singapore.
Park Ji-won starts us off.
In his latest tweet on North Korea on Friday evening, U.S. time, President Trump said (quote)
"North Korea and the U.S. are having productive talks about reinstating the summit",... and
(quote) "if it does happen, it will likely remain in Singapore on the same date, June
12th, and, if necessary, will be extended beyond that date."
Speaking to reporters at the White House earlier on Friday,... Trump also suggested the summit
could still happen on the previously-set date,... as discussions are ongoing.
"We'll see what happens.
It could even be the 12th.
We are talking to them now.
They very much want to do it.
We'd like to do it.
We'll see what happens."
Regarding a question on whether the U.S. is concerned North Korea is playing games,...
President Trump said Pyongyang is not the only one to do so.
"Everybody plays games.
You know that.
You know that better than anybody."
Senior U.S. officials are backing up the possibility that the summit could still happen on June
12th.
U.S. State Department Spokeswoman Heather Nauert said Friday that (quote) "there are
always high points and low points in diplomacy,"... and said the State Department is working on
plans going forward.
U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis also said the summit could still take place,... if diplomats
can pull it off.
In a surprise move on Thursday,...
President Trump announced that the summit was off,... citing North Korea's "tremendous
anger and open hostility" against the U.S..
Some eight hours after Trump's announcement,... North Korea's Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye-gwan
released a statement,... urging the U.S. to give more thought to cancelling the June 12th
summit.
It also said Kim Jong-un has poured his efforts into summit preparations,... adding the North
is willing to sit down face-to-face with Washington at any time, and in any format.
Park Ji-won, Arirang News.
-------------------------------------------
Singapore still on standby for N. Korea-U.S. summit happening on June 12: sources - Duration: 0:36.
Singapore remains on standby should the on.... off.... and possibly back on again North Korea-U.S.
summit take place in the city state on June 12th.
Sources say reservations at the Shangri-La Hotel over the summit period are not being
taken... and security sweeps are ongoing.
If the summit happens, President Trump is expected to stay at the hotel.
Singapore's ban on government officials and police taking vacation on or around June 12th
remains in place as well.
Soldiers working at the local air base where Air Force One is expected to land are also
on standby.
-------------------------------------------
THE US GOVERNMENT JUST ADMITTED TO RECOVERING MATERIALS FROM UFOS - Duration: 13:13.
THE US GOVERNMENT JUST ADMITTED TO RECOVERING MATERIALS FROM UFOS � HERE ARE THE LATEST
UPDATES
BY ARJUN WALIA
�Decades ago, visitors from other planets warned us about where we were headed and offered
to help.
But instead, we, or at least some of us, interpreted their visits as a threat, and decided to shoot
first and ask questions after.�
The quote above comes from Paul Hellyer, former Canadian defence minister.
First off, the fact that the official disclosure of Unidentified Flying Objects has happened
is huge, and those who are avid researchers of the phenomenon saw this one coming.
For years, we�ve experienced, as I�ve said many times before, an �official campaign
of ridicule and secrecy� (Ex-CIA Director Roscoe Hillenkoetter) of the phenomenon.
The establishment, in many ways, was responsible for the foolish articles that would constantly
appear in mainstream media publications, absolutely ridiculing a topic that was and is actually
quite real.
Today, we�ve seen a complete 180 degree switch.
UFOs are no longer ridiculed by the mainstream, which should raise a serious eyebrows because
very seldom does mainstream media share any sort of truth, especially when we�re talking
about projects that rank among the most secretive in the world.
You can read more about Black Budget programs, here.
Unfortunately, most of our media is controlled by a very small group of people, and declassified
documents alongside whistle-blower testimony has made this very clear.
Intelligence agencies have close relationships with �every major wire service, newspaper,
news weekly, and television network in the nation, this has helped us turn some �intelligence
failure� stories into �intelligence success� stories.� and has contributed to the accuracy
of countless others.� This comes straight from a CIA document.
Dr. Udo Ulfkotte, Sharyl Attkisson, Amber Lyon and many others have also provided many
examples of what it�s like to work inside a media organization that�s dominated by
government/corporate/deep state interests.
You can read more about them and what they had to say, here.
This is exactly why mainstream UFO disclosure is questionable, and there appears to be multiple
things happening here.
One is the fact that the phenomenon was so obvious for anybody who looked into it, from
a research perspective.
There was and has been more than ample evidence to show that the UFOs were and are real, that
there are �objects in our atmosphere which are technically miles in advance of anything
we can deploy.� (Lord Admiral Hill Norton, Former Chairman of the NATO Military Committee)
The statement below fromVictor Marchetti, former special assistant to the Deputy Director
of the Central Intelligence Agency, doesn�t seem to hold so true anymore, at least the
last part.
�We have, indeed, been contacted � perhaps even visited � by extraterrestrial beings,
and the US government, in collusion with the other national powers of the Earth, is determined
to keep this information from the general public.�
(Second Look, Volume 1, No 7, Washington, DC, May, 1979)
If you want to get into the extraterrestrial hypothesis, you can read the article linked
below:
�It�s official � We Now Know That UFOs or UAP Are Real � So Are They Extraterrestrial
or Not?�
One of the biggest mouthpieces for �the establishment,� The New York Times, admitted
something that the establishment, or facets of it, have been concealing for years; UFOs
are real.
The Times broke the story about a secret Pentagon program, but any UFO researcher knows these
programs are more in-depth, expensive, and expansive than anything that�s described
here.
According to the Times,
�In the $600 billion annual Defense Department budgets, the $22 million spent on the Advanced
Aerospace Threat Identification Program was almost impossible to find.
Which was how the Pentagon wanted it.
For years, the program investigated reports of unidentified flying objects, according
to Defense Department officials, interviews with program participants and records obtained
by The New York Times.
It was run by a military intelligence official, Luis Elizondo, on the fifth floor of the Pentagon�s
C Ring, deep within the building�s maze.
The Defense Department has never before acknowledged the existence of the program, which it says
it shut down in 2012.
But its backers say that, while the Pentagon ended funding for the effort at that time,
the program remains in existence.
For the past five years, they say, officials with the program have continued to investigate
episodes brought to them by service members, while also carrying out their other Defense
Department duties.� (source)
But..
What�s Missing From Mainstream UFO Disclosure One interesting thing to note here, is the
sharing of information and truth in order to lie.
For example, the MK Ultra program, a CIA based mind-control program is a great example.
This is because the evidence became so obvious that the U.S. government had no choice but
to disclose the reality of it.
Although they clearly did not share all, the public thought they did.
The program had been declassified and thus, all of the questions and inquiries into the
program stopped because apparently, the government released everything there is to know.
This is what we could be seeing with the UFO program.
Prior to this disclosure, dozens of other governments had already done so themselves,
and the field is loaded with a ton of credible witness testimony as well as various documents
released via The Freedom of Information Act.
Now that the Pentagon has admitted to this program, does that mean the existence of UFOs
has been disclosed, and that�s all there is to it?
Are we seeing a clever way of releasing information, in order to conceal more important information,
or is this really a slow disclosure initiative by the U.S. government?
And if it is, why are they doing it?
�Why is the mainstream covering this story the way they are?
I have been saying for years that the mainstream media, the establishment media, will never
cover the UFO subject in a serious way, that is, until they would be absolutely pushed
to the wall and then do something�So the question is, what is going on here?�If they�re
the voice of the establishment (mainstream media), then why have the establishment elected
to put this story out?
�
The quote above comes from historian Richard Dolan, he�s one of the most prominent thinkers
of our time.
He�s also one of the world�s leading researchers on the topic of UFO�s.
Richard goes on to explain, in the lecture linked below, that this is simply a tidbit
of truth that�s been made to look like the complete truth.
It brings up a number of key things that have been ignored by mainstream media regarding
the recent UFO disclosure, which is being addressed through the To The Stars Academy.
�The best way to keep a secret is you pretend to share it, you give some information out,
some genuine information, which they did, there were some significant revelations here,
significant admissions, and much that was not followed up�� � Dolan
He then outlines what�s missing here.
This is such an important point, that there has been no follow up regarding the alleged
possession of the materials that have been recovered from this object.
�Yes there have been crashed craft, and bodies recovered.
. . . We are not alone in the universe, they have been coming here for a long time.
I happen to be privileged enough to be in on the fact that we have been visited on this
planet, and the UFO phenomenon is real.� � Apollo 14 Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell
The head of this program was Luis Elizondo, a career intelligence officer, his experience
includes working in the U.S. Army, the Department of Defense, and the National Counterintelligence
Executive, he also spent time as the Director of National Intelligence.
Furthermore, he�s also managed the security for several sensitive projects for the U.S.
government as the Director for the National Programs Special Management Staff.
For the last 10 years of his career, Elizondo �ran a sensitive aerospace threat identification
program focusing on unidentified aerial technologies.� Where he learned that the the phenomenon is
indeed real.
He is big on the fact that there is enough evidence to suggest that �we�re not alone,�
and he�s also mentioned that materials from these objects have indeed been collected and
studied.
This is huge.
This was mentioned in the New York Times article above, that materials have indeed been recovered
from the craft, but Elizondo gave an exclusive interview to the organizers of the UFO Congress,
the world�s biggest UFO conference, and took place in Phoenix, Arizona, which painted
a different story�.
Alejandro Rojas, host of the UFO Congress said Mr. Elizondo had told him more about
the metal during the exclusive interviews that were screened at the event.
Mr Rojas said: �I can tell you it is not an alloy like the New York Times claims.�
As Scientific American points out:
�One of the authors of the Times report, Ralph Blumenthal, had this to say on MSNBC
about the alloys: �They have, as we reported in the paper, some material from these objects
that is being studied so that scientists can find what accounts for their amazing properties,
this technology of these objects, whatever they are.� When asked what the materials
were, Blumenthal responded, �They don�t know.
They�re studying it, but it�s some kind of compound that they don�t recognize.��
According to Rojas: �I shared at our conference that Elizondo has told me it is a �meta-material�
with strange isotopic values indicating it is not from Earth.�
This is quite significant, we�ve been given the narrative that it�s not really known
where these objects are, and figures like Neil deGrasse Tyson went on national television
trying to ridicule the extraterrestrial hypothesis.
�I�m not aware of any effort within the established media to follow up on this (pieces
of the UFOs) and to find out�where this comes from�I mean nothing�So, it�s five
months later, and we�re clearly not dealing with a serious effort by the mainstream media,
for that reason alone�I have had information now, from a very good source, that, what they�ve
recovered aren�t metal alloys, that they�re being described as meta-materials�a very
different thing�.The individual that I spoke with, about where did that phrase metal alloy
come, did it come Luis Elizondo I was told no it did not come from him.��
� Richard Dolan
The New York times article also mentions that these materials were shipped off to Bigelow
aerospace for examination, which is interesting because in a recent interview with 60 minutes,
Robert Bigelow, founder of the Bigelow Aerospace corporation, stated that he is aware of an
intelligent extraterrestrial presence visiting the planet.
You can watch that interview here.
This means that it came from one of the authors of the New York Times Article, an editor,
or an intelligence agency.
Dolan refers to this aspect of the article as, �intentionally deceptive.�
Another interesting thing is that Elizondo has mentioned multiple times that these encounters
have occurred hundreds of times and there have been extremely phenomenal encounters
that never really seemed to grab the attention of his higher ups, which is also odd.
A lot of these encounters have been documented, well before this disclosure.
There is a lot to discuss about this topic, and what�s going on here.
The talk below is interesting to say the least and if you�ve made it this far, I recommend
you give the whole thing a listen.
This topic is very significant, especially from a consciousness perspective.
It leaves no aspect of humanity untouched, and we just completed a very interesting podcast
with Richard Lawrence, Secretary of The Aetherius Society in Europe, discussing these implications.
-------------------------------------------
US companies face problems complying with GDPR laws - Duration: 5:14.
For more infomation >> US companies face problems complying with GDPR laws - Duration: 5:14. -------------------------------------------
The Intelligence Report: Trump says US is talking to NOKO - Duration: 11:54.
by presidents from signaling today that a summit with kim jong on next month
still might be possible after North Korea says it's willing to sit down with
the US and resolve any issues so maybe this is where the plans after all maybe
the president actually was trying to negotiate here was this some kind of art
of the deal well liberal media doesn't think so coming up you gotta hear how
the left is reacting to all the North Korean news my intel on why it's time
the left to realize president Trump's success is America's success in other
words we are in all of this together a mirror American before a political
speaking of the left one California Democrat says President Trump is firing
up his base with this whole talk of spy gates and he's peddling a deep state
narrative by claiming that there was an FBI informant planted in the Trump
campaign in 2016 I would only point out James Comey of course didn't do his
actual job and the FBI totally completely utterly failed us but though
we're going to talk about it a little bit with congressman Garamendi you know
and debated coming up straight ahead but first let's go to Blake blame it blake
berman he's at the white house for a little bit more on this north korea's
summit and whether or not it can happen after all like hi there trish yes it's
the white house taking a wait-and-see approach at this point I almost laughed
not that I'm laughing but because it's Friday now the fifth day of the workweek
and it feels like we've had five different time lines on this already
this week yesterday as you know President Trump announced that he was
pulling out of the meeting but here we are some twenty four hours later and it
appears as if it might potentially at least have the possibility of being back
on and that's because of the response from the North Koreans overnight the
Trump administration said yesterday that the ball was very clearly back in the
court of North Korea and North Korea responded to the president yesterday by
saying that they would still be willing to sit down and speak with the United
States before the president left the White House here earlier this morning to
address the recent graduates at the u.s. Naval Academy
the president suggested that there is a possibility of this June 12th meeting
maybe even happening let me see what happens we're talking to them now it was
a very nice statement they put up we'll see what happened we'll see what happens
it could even be the 12th we're talking to them now they very much want to do it
we'd like to do it we're gonna see what happens now just after that the defense
secretary James maddest except the diplomatic Avenue might still be open
possibly some good news and the Korea summit or at may my diplomats can pull
it off and they have it back on even president just sent out a note about
that a few moments ago and let you all know you heard the president there Trish
say that we are communicating with them now communicating with the North Koreans
the communication aspect to this is incredibly important remember yesterday
a senior White House official said one of the reasons that the president
decided to pull out of this was because an advanced team was in Singapore was
supposed to meet with the North Koreans to go over logistics the North Koreans
never showed up in fact the White House says quote they stood us up now that it
appears the communication lines might be back open again the White House at least
at this hour is reluctant to say whether or not it's advanced team which was
scheduled to go to Singapore again this weekend might be going back or not
Sarah Sanders telling us about an hour or so ago there's still a few hours left
until they might have to jump on that plane trust me all right like Berman
thank you very much you know the mainstream media and many politicians on
the Left have been trying to seize the moment here sort of celebrating that the
June 12th North Korea summit had been cancelled by our president watch them
here it goes that Nobel Peace Prize he was the art of diplomacy is a lot harder
than the art of the deal when he got this letter from the president saying
okay never mind he must be having a giggle fit right there now and North
Korea the president I was rehearsing his endzone dance and
we weren't even at the 50-yard line yet on this summer this is a total breakup
letter and you realize like this is when your relationships are showering but you
want to be the one to break up first so you cut it off you're kind of like maybe
we can leave it open-ended that's what this feels like breakup letter is there
even such a thing nowadays wouldn't be like a breakup text anyway um you can
see that they are almost rejoicing in this and what troubles me is that you I
get that he's not everyone's cup of tea you've heard me say that before I mean
this president is not for everyone and he's got a personality type that does
alienate some and I understand that there are two sides in Washington the
left and the right but you know what when it comes to making sure that we
ensure peace in the world and that we make sure that the North Koreans don't
have the ability to inflict enormous pain and suffering on millions of people
via a nuclear weapon that seems to me one where we should all be united and we
should all hope for the best and we shouldn't be saying oh he shouldn't have
this summit we should say good let's have a dialogue let's fix this and we
also shouldn't be saying see told you something told you so told you so no we
should be saying again let's fix this we are American before we are anything else
joining me right now Republican congressman from New York Tom Reid
congressman this is what's troubling right now and frankly I mean this is not
putting the country first to me you know you forget about some of your
differences when you're dealing with an international conflict such as the one
we're dealing with with North Korea and you celebrate an opportunity to bring
peace to the world and yet we are so broken right now in this country that
the likes of Nancy Pelosi and her colleagues are saying huh I told you so
you have the media saying I told you so in almost rejoicing
in this summit now not happening what does that tell you yes I couldn't say it
any better than you just did but the other message that's being sent here is
I think it's from our president to North Korea saying he's not going to worry
about political gamemanship he's not gonna worry about winning a Nobel Peace
Prize he's going to come at this negotiation from a position of strength
and send the message to North Korea which we should all agree upon
Democrats and Republicans mainstream media left-right media that North Korea
cannot have a nuclear weapon else millions of people will be killed that's
the reality of the conversation we're having and when you see rhetoric like
this where folks fellow Americans are almost enjoy seing rejoicing in the fact
that this potentially could collapse that is just wrong and it's the wrong
message to send to the leaders of North Korea where we have to send in United
message of oil negotiate but it comes from a position of strength what do you
think China's role is in all this you know I was talking to general King just
yesterday and the general made the point that you saw a real shift in the
rhetoric coming out of North Korea after Kim jong-un's second visit the first was
more publicized the second a little bit more under the radar his second visit to
China all of a sudden things were not quite so hunky-dory with with the US do
you think China behind the scenes is trying to pull a few strings to make
sure that the u.s. and North Korea don't get too close well absolutely
China is critical to the successful outcome of this and some of the things
that are also in players the relationship between the US and China
that's just the nature of the beast and the relationship there but hopefully
this message of pulling out of the summit that the president was leading
from a position of strength I only sent a message to North Korea but to China to
say you better have stand with us in these negotiations and the message is
hopefully they have done to North Korea directly nuclear weapons on the problem
of course is that the Chinese they do things like sign up for sanctions right
and and they kind of go along with it for a little while but general keen
sources of which he has some very good ones are telling him that actually trade
is back on right now with North Korea and they are actually importing some
coal now to China from North Korea I mean you look at the GDP statistics
right in North Korea and they've gone up in recent years they can't really go up
when you don't trade with anyone but in fact they are trading with China in
other words they have a customer for their stuff how do we get through to
China at a time when we're also trying to say hey Chyna enough with the trade
tariffs yeah well that's why the policy of maximum pressure includes cutting off
the relationship between North Korea and China and making sure the flow of cash
is critically restrained or stopped going into North Korea and I think at
the end of the day China will recognize it's in their interest or interest to
make sure North Korea does not have a nuclear weapon mm-hmm yeah you're gonna
have two choices there Kris you're going to either have peace or you're going to
have war and war in the backyard of China is not in China's eye I hear you
right they don't need all the refugees coming in to mainland China that's gonna
be a problem they certainly don't want chaos there on that peninsula but
nonetheless they also like having a buffer right between us and them and
they know that if we're chummy with North Korea or if we somehow were able
to in general Bolton the general forgive me ambassador Bolton has said to me now
Secretary of State has said to me over and over again how much he would forgive
me national security advisor and gone through a lot of vitals okay it's Friday
before a holiday weekend the National Security Advisor jumbles and has told me
how much he would like to unify that peninsula if that happens I mean you
know China's not going to be happy about that congressman and I think that's
perhaps some of the dynamic that's being played out I think there's a little bit
of that but at the end of the day if it's a choice between a nuclearized
Peninsula with North Korea and war I think China will sign and see the
recognition that there needs to be a stability brought to the to the
peninsula and that's where we're gonna end up I hope in my opinion well
congressman I hope so too it's good to see you thank you very much
congressman was happy Memorial Day weekend
all right the u.s. is reaching a deal dick he's Chinese telecom Zee
ii-in business we're going to examine the details of this deal and whether or
not it really makes sense plus if your Amazon echo doing more than
listening to your private conversations could it actually be recording your
private conversations one family says yes you got to hear this story we have
details coming up
you
-------------------------------------------
Racist Woman Attacks US Serviceman - Duration: 5:04.
JAMES AHN IS
A
KOREAN AMERICAN MAN WHO WAS DRIVING ALONG AND HERE IS WHAT
HAPPENED IN THE CAR NEXT TO HIM, THIS WOMAN TOOK ISSUE WITH
HIM AND HIS RACE.
TAKE A LOOK.
GO BACK TO YOUR OWN COUNTRY GO BACK TO YOUR COUNTRY.
THIS IS NOT CHINESE.
I AM SO SCARED.
OH MY GOD, CHINESE UGLY.
HE POSTED THAT.
IT WENT VIRAL.
WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE VIDEO MOMENT.
WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?
WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
SAYS GO BACK TO YOUR COUNTRY.
JAMES, BY THE WAY, IS IN THE AIR
FORCE RESERVE AND HE IS AN AMERICAN SO THIS IS HIS COUNTRY.
RACISM HAS THE UGLIEST SPOKESPEOPLE.
I LOOKED AT THIS, I AM SAYING IT.
I AM CALLING SOMEBODY UGLY.
THAT IS THE OPINION ME OF UGLY.
WHAT I AM IN ALL OF IS THAT PEOPLE WHO DO STUFF LIKE
THIS TAKE FOR GRANTED THAT THEY ARE DEALING WITH PEOPLE WHO
ARE SAYING AND DIPLOMATIC INTACT FULL.
THEY DON'T EVER KNOW WHAT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE.
YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?
WHERE I GREW UP, YOU COULD GET REALLY BEAT UP FOR SAYING
SOMETHING LIKE THAT TO SOMEONE.
YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT IS ON THE
OTHER SIDE.
I AM SO AMAZED AT HOW IN BOLD INTO THIS BEHAVIOR
HAS BECOME IN THIS RECENT TIME, THAT THEY REALLY ARE OUT THERE,
EVERY OTHER DAY IT'S A DIFFERENT VIDEO, IN ADDITION TO ITS
BULLYING BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT IS, AT THE END OF THE DAY IT'S A
HATE CRIME, AT THE END OF THE DAY IT'S BULLYING BEHAVIOR BUT
HAVE YOU EVER SEEN WHEN THE BULLY GETS PUNCHED BACK?
I KIND OF LIKE YOUR OLD SCHOOL THING ABOUT THE GUYS
GETTING BEAT UP IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
THESE DAYS YOU WOULD GET SHOT.
THERE'S NO BEATING UP THE.
EXACTLY.
PEOPLE ARE PULLING GUNS.
REALLY.
I WOULDN'T GET INTAKE
INTO AGONISTIC LIKE THAT ANYWHERE, YOU'VE TAKEN YOUR LIFE
INTO YOUR HANDS, THIS IS AMERICA, HAVE YOU NOT SEEN
DONALD GLOVER'S VIDEO CLUSTER BUT LET'S NOT IGNORE THE
FASCINATING PART OF THIS WHICH IS SHE HAS AN ACCENT.
THERE IS
TWO PARTS OF THAT, ONE IS SOMEHOW IT IS HER COUNTRY AND
THAT IS OKAY, IT IS ALL OF OUR COUNTRIES BUT IT IS WEIRD HOW
EVERYONE SIX OWNERSHIP.
IT IS ONLY MY COUNTRY.
THE RACIST
WHITE GUY IN NEW YORK HE WAS YELLING AT THE PEOPLE SPEAKING
SPANISH.
WHAT DID HE SAY, GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY.
SHE HAS AN
ACCENT, I DON'T KNOW WHERE SHE IS WRONG, I DON'T KNOW WHERE SHE
IS FROM, A LOT OF PEOPLE IN MY FAMILY HAVE ACCESS TO GO AROUND
SAYING IT IS MY COUNTRY, EVERYBODY GET OUT.
WHEN THERE
IS A BENIGN VERSION OF THIS IT IS KIND OF AMUSING, SO I WILL
SEE IMMIGRANTS OF DIFFERENT NATIONALITIES GET FRUSTRATED
WITH EACH OTHER WHEN THEY BOTH DON'T HAVE GREAT ENGLISH AND
THEY WILL BE LIKE, GET A LOT OF THIS GUY.
DO YOU HEAR YOURSELF?
BUT HERE, THEY TOOK IT TO A BAD PLACE WITH GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY
BECAUSE YOU ARE ASIAN.
AND SHE WENT ON EXTRA TO THE SHE WAS ALL IN IT.
THAT IS SO 70S.
STEP YOUR RACISM GAME UP.
NOBODY
DOES THAT ANYMORE.
IT WAS FUNNY TO ME, IS THAT WEIRD?
IT WAS SO OVER-THE-TOP.
YOU ARE LIKE, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF YOU IS
ROAD RAGE VERSUS JUST SUPER RACIST RIGHT NOW AND THE GUY
SAYS HE POSTED IT KIND OF, SO PEOPLE IN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD,
FOR THEIR SAFETY TO LOOKOUT FOR THIS WOMAN, BUT I'M GLAD HE
WROTE IT BECAUSE IT IS LIKE THIS STUFF HAPPENS, IT IS RIDICULOUS
AND WE WILL SHOW IT FOR HOW RIDICULOUS AND TERRIBLE IT
IS.
LAST THINGS.
IT DEPENDS ON THE CONTEXT OF WHETHER IT'S
FUNNY SO I'VE A LOT OF ASIAN FRIENDS AND FOLKS WHO WORK HERE
AND IF YOU ARE IN OKAY SHAPE, LIKE STEVE O, AND YOU MIGHT KNOW
HIM FROM AGGRESSIVE PROGRESSIVE.
HE WOULD LAUGH THAT OFF.
TODAY
HE WOULD, AS HE IS IN OKAY SHAPE AND HE THINKS YOU ARE AN IDIOT,
YOU ARE IN WORSE SHAPE THAN I AM, BUT IN THE OLD DAYS
THOUGH, WHEN HE WAS IN AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND THEY WOULD
MAKE FUN OF HIM FOR BEING ASIAN AND HE WAS THE ONLY ASIAN IN THE
SCHOOL AND HE WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF VIRGINIA, IT WASN'T FUNNY SO
IT DEPENDS ON THE CONTEXT.
NOW THE SECOND PART IS IT'S NOT A
CRIME.
AND THE COPS LOOKED INTO IT AND THEY ARE LIKE SHE HAS THE
FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SAY IN THERE WAS NO ASSAULT AND THAT IS
ACTUALLY TRUE SO IT IS A BAD IDEA, DON'T DO IT BUT THEY
ACTUALLY CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
-------------------------------------------
Push to break up California into three states - Duration: 2:51.
For more infomation >> Push to break up California into three states - Duration: 2:51. -------------------------------------------
Rep. Rooney on ZTE: US is enabling a technology pirate - Duration: 3:51.
For more infomation >> Rep. Rooney on ZTE: US is enabling a technology pirate - Duration: 3:51. -------------------------------------------
N. Korea-U.S. Summit cancellation not a surprise: Experts - Duration: 3:19.
Some perceive Trump's shocking decision as an impulsive one.
But there are those who believe it is a calculated move, perhaps even a negotiation strategy
Oh Soo-young help us find out if there's a method to his madness.
The sudden cancellation of the North Korea-U.S. summit may have been a sudden decision, but
it wasn't entirely a surprise.
Experts on North Korea told Arirang News Friday it was clear both sides lacked working-level
preparations for a meeting on June 12th.
"I think the American side particularly wasn't ready.
Donald Trump wasn't focusing on this very much.
He was interested in the drama and theatre of it.
But it wasn't clear the president was doing the research in the time and the study necessary
to actually debate these complex issues with the North.
North Korea's behavior in the last couple of weeks didn't help.
They stood up American negotiators in Singapore, they just left them standing there for three
days in a row.
The whole thing was just going too fast."
Without sufficient back-channel talks, major sticking points remain unresolved.
According to some experts, that is why both Washington and Pyongyang, over the past week,
indicated they may call the summit off.
"There's a little gamesmanship going on here.
In Trump's case, a lot of the critics were saying he seems to eager for the summit, so
he's playing hard to get.
And the North Koreans have a history of also playing hard to get.
North Koreans said they would walk out if the U.S. was forcing them to denuclearize."
Pyongyang has called for a gradual process of scrapping its nukes -- an approach Washington
has resisted, given the North's track record of breaking promises and backing out of verifying
its nuclear dismantlement.
"My strong hunch is serious people are working on the U.S side, we want to have the North
stop producing plutonium and highly enriched uranium.
That's the first order of business.
We probably want to have the second location of the enrichment site told to us early on....
some declaration of how much high enriched uranium and plutonium it has produced and
how many nuclear weapons they have.
They don't have to do this right at the summit but it is the key, critical early step."
North Korea, on its part, is also likely to demand concrete steps from the U.S. -- first
and foremost, a security guarantee for its ruling regime.
"They want to make sure if they do give up some of their nuclear weapons program, the
Americans won't attack them.
I think the U.S. will have some trouble credibly committing to North Korean security, which
is why the North Koreans will never go to zero.
The Libyan model didn't work out very well for the Libyans, right?
So the Americans need to make a set of reasonable offers that the North Koreans might buy and
they comeback with some things that we want.
Besides a security guarantee, I imagine they would want a sanctions relief.
Economic assistance, and diplomatic normalization."
Before a new date and venue is set, experts say working-level efforts are needed from
both sides, involving diplomats and nuclear weapons experts.
They need to devise a framework that Trump and Kim can work with to reach a denuclearization
agreement.
Oh Soo-young, Arirang News.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét