Thứ Năm, 24 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 24 2018

So, we're going to head to the mall,

I want to just make sure that I'm good from a clothing standpoint for the next couple of weeks

I got a bunch of clothes that;

my form is kind of tapered in a little bit,

And so, I want to get them tailored.

At the same time I want pick up some sneakers

and maybe pick up some new stuff as well.

Make sure that I'm looking...

Looking good.

That's how I do it.

Just one store,

buy as many things as I can.

In and out.

I found this shirt, I love it.

So I'm just going to buy like seven of them.

Honestly, I just have a couple of stores that I go to,

I I know what size I am,

I know which stores kind of fit me and,

I also know which stores have the colors and the general style

that best matches my personal style.

My style is about half seductor and half elegant;

and sometimes casual, when I wear t-shirts.

Also. I follow a seasonal style pattern,

this is something my stylist taught me.

So my season is autumn.

My season is autumn because my skin tends to be a little bit tan,

I've got dark eyes, dark hair;

And autumn colors, which is what worked best for me.

So autumn colors are café, wine,

like blue petroleum, so like dark blue ,like what I have on right now.

coral, salmon,

basically all the colors you would associate with autumn.

You put those colors next to my face and I it makes my face light up,

versus what I used to wear all the time,

which was just black and blue.

Literally that was it.

All my clothes were black and blue.

While going on, basically I try 15 shirts,

and then the five that I absolutely love the most are the ones that I leave with.

I needed to get more shirts that are just more fitted.

I've lost some weight recently

I've gotten a little more cut up,

and I want to make sure that I'm wearing stuff that really flatters my aesthetic.

A lot of people think that I spend a lot of time and money on clothes,

I really don't.

I go shopping like once every six months.

Three years ago I had no idea how to dress.

Every shirt that I bought, everything that I bought was just like black,

and I think that's what most guys do, just black, blue.

There's literally not a piece of clothing that I have, with very few exceptions,

that is outside of the autumn spectrum of colors.

Alright guys, 3:10.

Mira is running a little late for our salsa class,

So, let's have a few minutes to explain...-

I just go to the same stores.

Stores that I know that have my size, my style.

So Stik is fantastic for me.

This cares to guys that are a little slimmer, more of a v-cut.

And they have a more elegant style.

So my style, again, is half seductor-half elegance,

and at times casual.

So you can see, these shirts...-

The seductor part, a big part of that really is the fit of the shirt.

So any shirt that I buy,

if it's not a perfect fit,

I'm going to bring it to the tailor and make sure that it's perfectly tailored for my body type.

What I really like about Stik in particular, aside from the size, the sizing,

is they know how to use, really intelligently use contrasting colors,

and little details that make their shirts very unique.

Nobody wants to wear the same thing that everyone else has,

so even like this shirt right here.

Just look at the this nice petroleum blue.

And so when I roll up the sleeves,

you can see...

you know, that's just a beautiful blue.

And t's beautiful contrast.

Now, this I bought just because of the way that it plays with the light.

So you'll see this shirt,

because of the little dots and because of this color blue in the material,

It's got almost like a sheen to it.

And so this looks really nice.

So if I go out like in a sunny day or in a place where I know there's going to be a lot of light,

I'll wear something like this.

This is actually somewhat out of my color spectrum,

like this color turquoise blue.

it's not within autumn,

but white and this coffee color are.

And this is just a unique enough shirt, where you'll see, I mean...-

You can see like, I stand out.

It makes my face brighter

and that's what you want to shoot for when you're buying clothes.

Pilatos is the other store that we went to.

They have really nice sneakers.

So I needed a pair of just dark sneakers,

which we got here.

And then, as I was walking out of the store,

and I needed more t-shirts.

I found this.

I love this.

So this is definitely a casual style,

but the material, I don't know if you can see this,

is just awesome material.

Just hugs my body,

it's got a good nice v cut to it;

So I ended up just buying like nine of this exact same brand of shirt.

So they're all different.

They're all different colors.

ll these all have autumnal colors.

This is petroleum blue.

This is a mustard color.

Anyway, let me get changed.

Let me see what's up with Mira.

It's almost time for salsa.

Hey guys, so just some final thoughts

as this episode is now concluded.

So, very productive day

I'm feeling really good about self-improvement dark-mode starting this coming Monday

This conclusion that we're filming right now is

actually, I guess, a day or two after the stuff that you just saw in this episode.

I wanted to kind of quickly end the stuff that I was doing with Myra and this salsa scene, so

again, my declared goal for dark mode

for salsa is going to be to dance a complete song with the same energy.

Which I don't know how that sounds to you guys;

But it's very, very, very difficult.

Even top level of dancers,

many, many, many top level dancers dont quite know,

or even understand how to do that.

Make no mistake, it's going to be a very difficult goal.

What you saw me and Mira practicing in that scene,

was basically, you can call it energy sensitivity,

where she would touch me here and I would allow my shoulder to more backwards

without any sort of...-

Kind of restraint.

Like there's a natural thing that happens if you touch the human body,

or even if you get some instructions that just kind of be free,

because of that kind of world an external...-

Externality, I think that's the word.

you know she could touch my shoulder here,

and I can, even very subconsciously or unconsciously,

Just not be free, not move backwards.

And so these sort of exercises I think are really useful for connecting with the energy of dance,

like just her doing that,

and just allowing my head to...-

and even more than that.

Just allowing my head to...

head to just kind of find its own path.

Just kind of removing the stimulus between her touching me and

And thought.

Which ultimately thought is my enemy here.

I want to just feel.

And so these practices are designed to kind of remove that additional layer that creates friction.

Ultimately when you're trying to express yourself energetically through dance.

I think that makes sense.

I mean it make sense to me.

hopefully make sense to you

Anyway this episodes over.

See you guys the next episode.

Oh shit

If you enjoyed this episode,

again get ready, dark mode's coming next week.

It's going to be extremely, extremely exciting,

So, please like.

Please subscribe.

Please leave comments.

I just hope you're enjoying these episodes

For more infomation >> 50% Seductor, 50% Elegant... and a little casual | Dark Mode Prep #2 - Duration: 12:35.

-------------------------------------------

writer in the dark - lorde (cover) - Duration: 1:18.

break the news, you're walking out

to be a good man for someone else

sorry i was never good like you

stood on my chest and kept me down

hated hearing my name on the lips of a crowd

did my best to exist just for you

bet you rue the day you kissed the writer in the dark

now she's gonna play and sing and lock you in her heart

bet you rue the day you kissed the writer in the dark

i am my mother's child. i'll love you 'til my breathing stops. i'll love you 'til you call the cops on me

but in our darkest hours, i stumbled on a secret power. i'll find a way to be without you- and the fucking video cut off great!!!!!!

For more infomation >> writer in the dark - lorde (cover) - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

WE'RE GOING BACK! CHINA TO BECOME THE FIRST NATION TO LAND ON THE DARK - Duration: 12:43.

WE�RE GOING BACK! CHINA TO BECOME THE FIRST NATION TO LAND ON THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

BY ARJUN WALIA

China is set to do something no other nation has done, and that�s land on the far side

of the moon. This year, they plan to launch two missions known as �Chang�e 4�. The

first part will launch in June, which will really act as a satellite positioned approximately

60,000 km behind the moon. This will serve for communication purposes, linking the Earth

and the far side of the moon. This is, apparently, why we�ve never been to the dark side, because

the technicalities of clear communication are impossible, so we�re told. This drastically

counters all of the evidence suggesting we have been there. There are some articles linked

below where you can learn more about that. Once this link is established, it will allow

China to send the second part of the mission: a lander to the far side�s surface.

By the way, Tidal forces from Earth have slowed the Moon�s rotation to where the same side

is always facing the Earth, this is why the other side is called the Dark Side, because

we can never look at it, not even with a telescope. That being said, I personally do not buy that

explanation, completely. You will see why later in the article as I elaborate on the

moon. Furthermore, I do believe we have been back, and were there prior to when we were

told we got there, but that�s a different discussion all together.

Will the true findings of this mission be publicly disclosed to the world? When it comes

to space news, it�s so hard to believe anything we hear. Mainstream rhetoric completely goes

against those speaking out who are directly from �within� and on the front lines.

Now, that does not mean that these people may also be dishing out misinformation, but

when you have them in multiples from various fields, from aerospace all the way to the

ranks of the military, academia, politics and more, it�s not hard to see that something

is going on. What that is, we don�t exactly know; but we do know it�s not always what

we are told.

Take for example Robert Bigelow, who recently gave an interview with 60 minutes making it

quite clear that he has knowledge of the fact that we are not alone, and that we have been

visited, and are being visited. Multiple Apollo astronauts have said the same thing�there

are literally to many examples to name. Apollo 14�s Edgar Mitchell told the world that

he has been �privileged� enough to be in on the fact that we are not alone, and

that they�ve been coming here for years.

Perhaps the greatest source of confusion is the moon. Surrounded by �conspiracy,�

according to my research, it seems that the conspiracy is not whether or not we went to

the moon, it�s about what happened when we got there. I go into more detail about

that in an article I published in November of 2017: you can read it here.

For more information, before we get to the Dark Side of the Moon, you can also check

out these selected articles:

A CE Podcast About The Face On Mars & Strange Structures On The Moon

Faking The Moon Landing Isn�t The Conspiracy, It�s What Really Happened When We Got There

�We Did Go To The Moon, But The Footage Was Fake�

The United States Tried To Detonate A Nuclear Weapon On The Moon. Somebody Responded When

We Did

The Dark Side: Will We Get The Truth From China? If We Look At Some Recent History About

This Issue, Perhaps Not� As mentioned above, it�s so hard to get

any genuine information. Take Dr. John Brandenburg. He was the Deputy Manager of the Clementine

Mission to the Moon, which was part of a joint space project between the Ballistic Missile

Defense Organization (BMDO) and NASA. The mission discovered water at the Moon�s poles

in 1994, but according to Brandenburg, the Clementine Mission had an ulterior agenda:

�The Clementine Mission was a photo reconnaissance mission basically to check out if someone

was building bases on the moon that we didn�t know about. Were they expanding them? . . . Of

all the pictures I�ve seen from the moon that show possible structures, the most impressive

is a picture of a miles wide recto-linear structure. This looked unmistakably artificial,

and it shouldn�t be there. As somebody in the space defense community, I look on any

such structure on the moon with great concern because it isn�t ours, there�s no way

we could have built such a thing. It means someone else is up there.�

Whether or not you believe them is up to you. But we have evidence that goes beyond witness

testimony, and Brandenburg is just one small example among many.

Members of the Society For Planetary SETI Research (SPSR) have recently published a

paper in the Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far side of

the moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C. Entitled �Image Analysis of Unusual Structures

on the Far Side of the Moon in the Crater Paracelsus C,� it argues that these features

might be artificial in origin, meaning someone other than a human being built them and put

them there. Contrary to popular belief, reports of artificial

structures on the moon are both common and persistent. Among the first were from George

Leonard�s 1976 book, Somebody Else is on the Moon, and Fred Steckling�s 1981 book,

We Discovered Alien Bases on The Moon.

This new study describes how they discovered seven Apollo-15 and four Lunar Reconnaissance

Orbiter (LRO) images of the same enigmatic objects in the moon crater Paracelsus C, and

how they differ significantly from the rocks scattered around and within the majority of

craters on Luna.

Another great point the authors make: a decidedly conservative mainstream scientific establishment

often rejects anomalies based on subject matter alone (i.e. there cannot be alien artifacts

on the moon because there are no alien artifacts on the moon, or on other planets). Such a

view is an example of circular reasoning, based on the belief that extraterrestrials

do not exist, or if they do exist that they could not have traveled to our solar system.

One of the authors, Mark Carlotto, an image scientist with 30 years of experience in satellite

remote sensing and digital image processing, studied optics, signal, and image processing

at Carnegie-Mellon University from 1972-1981, where he received his Ph.D. in electrical

engineering. He�s had several positions in academia and industry. Here are some of

the peer-reviewed papers he�s authored and co-authored prior to this one.

Members of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (Vasin and Shcherbakov, 1970), run by the

Russian Government, published an article entitled �Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?�

This article offered another explanation for how the moon may have been created. This seems

to be a better hypothesis, because there is actually a considerable amount of evidence

that points towards something suspicious happening on the Moon.

�We cannot help but come to the conclusion that the Moon, by rights, ought not to be

there. The fact that it is, is one of those strokes of luck almost to good to accept.�

� Isaac Asimov, Russian Professor of Biochemistry

�It�s easier to explain the non-existence of the Moon, than its existence.� � NASA

scientist Robin Brett

�The best explanation for the Moon is observational error � the Moon doesn�t exist.� � Irwin

Shapiro, Harvard Astrophysicist

When more people started to ask questions about some sort of presence on the Moon, the

most common response was the fact that it would be impossible; that amateur astronomers,

given the technology today, would be able to identify such claims with ease. This response

is only half valid, given the fact that they would only be able to observe one side of

the Moon! A lot of information is available to suggest that there are some structures

on the moon and also some type of operation occurring that�s unknown to the majority

of people on planet Earth. They could be human operations, extraterrestrial operations, or

joint human and extraterrestrial operations. If you are going to hide something from the

eyes of astronomers, the �dark side� of the Moon is the perfect place to do it.

The STARGATE project was one of multiple programs that the U.S. government undertook to examine

non-material science and �psi� phenomena like telepathy and telekinesis. It ran for

more than two decades, and a lot of information regarding the program has since been declassified

and opened for public viewing.

The program was used multiple times for successful intelligence collection, as outlined in a

paper published after the declassification in 1995:

�To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods,

and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories

has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon.

Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals

could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise.

. . . The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting

CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled

laboratory conditions.�

Remote viewing was one of their most successful programs under the STARGATE umbrella. Remote

viewing is the the ability of individuals to describe a remote geographical location

up to several hundred thousand kilometers away (or more) from their physical location.

This phenomenon has been confirmed by multiple studies, having repeated the same thing, which

is why the program ran in secret for more than two decades until it was declassified.

�Successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories

has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon.

Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals

could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise.

The CIA even participated as remote viewers themselves in order to critique the protocols.

CIA personnel generated successful target descriptions of sufficiently high quality

to permit blind matching of descriptions to targets by independent judges.�

A gentlemen by the name of Ingo Swann was able to successfully describe and view a ring

around Jupiter, a ring that scientists had no idea existed. This took place immediately

before the first ever flyby of Jupiter by NASA�s Pioneer 10 spacecraft, which confirmed

that the ring did actually exist. These results were published in advance of the rings�

discovery.

Ingo wrote plenty about the Moon and his findings on it. The fact that this man was closely

connected and often used by the intelligence community (2)(3) should sound some alarms

in realizing the importance of his work. Also, the fact that he successfully remote viewed

Jupiter before modern science could is astonishing.

Here�s what he had to say about the moon,

�It�s one thing to read about UFOs and stuff in the papers or in books. It is another

to hear rumours which say they have captured extraterrestrials and downed alien space craft.

But it�s quite another matter to find oneself in a situation which confirms everything.

I found towers, machinery, lights, buildings, humanoids busy at work on something I couldn�t

figure out .�

The implications of this information are huge, and we believe are spiritual in nature. For

multiple reasons, this seems like an educated interpretation.

We have a lot of work to do on ourselves here on planet Earth, and perhaps that�s all

tied into the ET phenomena in several different ways. All this and more is discussed exclusively

in our Explorers Lounge.

For more infomation >> WE'RE GOING BACK! CHINA TO BECOME THE FIRST NATION TO LAND ON THE DARK - Duration: 12:43.

-------------------------------------------

[FREE] Travis Scott Type Trap Beat "Mute" | Dark Hip Hop Instrumental | Free Type Beat | iamDose - Duration: 3:39.

For more infomation >> [FREE] Travis Scott Type Trap Beat "Mute" | Dark Hip Hop Instrumental | Free Type Beat | iamDose - Duration: 3:39.

-------------------------------------------

Try This If You Have Dark Spots, Uneven Skin Tone/How to Get Clear Skin and Even Skin Tone Naturally - Duration: 4:55.

Please SUBSCRIBE Rani G Health & Beauty Tips

For more infomation >> Try This If You Have Dark Spots, Uneven Skin Tone/How to Get Clear Skin and Even Skin Tone Naturally - Duration: 4:55.

-------------------------------------------

WE'RE GOING BACK! CHINA TO BECOME THE FIRST NATION TO LAND ON THE DARK SIDE - Duration: 12:54.

WE�RE GOING BACK! CHINA TO BECOME THE FIRST NATION TO LAND ON THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

BY ARJUN WALIA

China is set to do something no other nation has done, and that�s land on the far side

of the moon. This year, they plan to launch two missions known as �Chang�e 4�. The

first part will launch in June, which will really act as a satellite positioned approximately

60,000 km behind the moon. This will serve for communication purposes, linking the Earth

and the far side of the moon. This is, apparently, why we�ve never been to the dark side, because

the technicalities of clear communication are impossible, so we�re told. This drastically

counters all of the evidence suggesting we have been there. There are some articles linked

below where you can learn more about that. Once this link is established, it will allow

China to send the second part of the mission: a lander to the far side�s surface.

By the way, Tidal forces from Earth have slowed the Moon�s rotation to where the same side

is always facing the Earth, this is why the other side is called the Dark Side, because

we can never look at it, not even with a telescope. That being said, I personally do not buy that

explanation, completely. You will see why later in the article as I elaborate on the

moon. Furthermore, I do believe we have been back, and were there prior to when we were

told we got there, but that�s a different discussion all together.

Will the true findings of this mission be publicly disclosed to the world? When it comes

to space news, it�s so hard to believe anything we hear. Mainstream rhetoric completely goes

against those speaking out who are directly from �within� and on the front lines.

Now, that does not mean that these people may also be dishing out misinformation, but

when you have them in multiples from various fields, from aerospace all the way to the

ranks of the military, academia, politics and more, it�s not hard to see that something

is going on. What that is, we don�t exactly know; but we do know it�s not always what

we are told.

Take for example Robert Bigelow, who recently gave an interview with 60 minutes making it

quite clear that he has knowledge of the fact that we are not alone, and that we have been

visited, and are being visited. Multiple Apollo astronauts have said the same thing�there

are literally to many examples to name. Apollo 14�s Edgar Mitchell told the world that

he has been �privileged� enough to be in on the fact that we are not alone, and

that they�ve been coming here for years.

Perhaps the greatest source of confusion is the moon. Surrounded by �conspiracy,�

according to my research, it seems that the conspiracy is not whether or not we went to

the moon, it�s about what happened when we got there. I go into more detail about

that in an article I published in November of 2017: you can read it here.

For more information, before we get to the Dark Side of the Moon, you can also check

out these selected articles:

A CE Podcast About The Face On Mars & Strange Structures On The Moon

Faking The Moon Landing Isn�t The Conspiracy, It�s What Really Happened When We Got There

�We Did Go To The Moon, But The Footage Was Fake�

The United States Tried To Detonate A Nuclear Weapon On The Moon. Somebody Responded When

We Did

The Dark Side: Will We Get The Truth From China? If We Look At Some Recent History About

This Issue, Perhaps Not� As mentioned above, it�s so hard to get

any genuine information. Take Dr. John Brandenburg. He was the Deputy Manager of the Clementine

Mission to the Moon, which was part of a joint space project between the Ballistic Missile

Defense Organization (BMDO) and NASA. The mission discovered water at the Moon�s poles

in 1994, but according to Brandenburg, the Clementine Mission had an ulterior agenda:

�The Clementine Mission was a photo reconnaissance mission basically to check out if someone

was building bases on the moon that we didn�t know about. Were they expanding them? . . . Of

all the pictures I�ve seen from the moon that show possible structures, the most impressive

is a picture of a miles wide recto-linear structure. This looked unmistakably artificial,

and it shouldn�t be there. As somebody in the space defense community, I look on any

such structure on the moon with great concern because it isn�t ours, there�s no way

we could have built such a thing. It means someone else is up there.�

Whether or not you believe them is up to you. But we have evidence that goes beyond witness

testimony, and Brandenburg is just one small example among many.

Members of the Society For Planetary SETI Research (SPSR) have recently published a

paper in the Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far side of

the moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C. Entitled �Image Analysis of Unusual Structures

on the Far Side of the Moon in the Crater Paracelsus C,� it argues that these features

might be artificial in origin, meaning someone other than a human being built them and put

them there. Contrary to popular belief, reports of artificial

structures on the moon are both common and persistent. Among the first were from George

Leonard�s 1976 book, Somebody Else is on the Moon, and Fred Steckling�s 1981 book,

We Discovered Alien Bases on The Moon.

This new study describes how they discovered seven Apollo-15 and four Lunar Reconnaissance

Orbiter (LRO) images of the same enigmatic objects in the moon crater Paracelsus C, and

how they differ significantly from the rocks scattered around and within the majority of

craters on Luna.

Another great point the authors make: a decidedly conservative mainstream scientific establishment

often rejects anomalies based on subject matter alone (i.e. there cannot be alien artifacts

on the moon because there are no alien artifacts on the moon, or on other planets). Such a

view is an example of circular reasoning, based on the belief that extraterrestrials

do not exist, or if they do exist that they could not have traveled to our solar system.

One of the authors, Mark Carlotto, an image scientist with 30 years of experience in satellite

remote sensing and digital image processing, studied optics, signal, and image processing

at Carnegie-Mellon University from 1972-1981, where he received his Ph.D. in electrical

engineering. He�s had several positions in academia and industry. Here are some of

the peer-reviewed papers he�s authored and co-authored prior to this one.

Members of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (Vasin and Shcherbakov, 1970), run by the

Russian Government, published an article entitled �Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?�

This article offered another explanation for how the moon may have been created. This seems

to be a better hypothesis, because there is actually a considerable amount of evidence

that points towards something suspicious happening on the Moon.

�We cannot help but come to the conclusion that the Moon, by rights, ought not to be

there. The fact that it is, is one of those strokes of luck almost to good to accept.�

� Isaac Asimov, Russian Professor of Biochemistry

�It�s easier to explain the non-existence of the Moon, than its existence.� � NASA

scientist Robin Brett

�The best explanation for the Moon is observational error � the Moon doesn�t exist.� � Irwin

Shapiro, Harvard Astrophysicist

When more people started to ask questions about some sort of presence on the Moon, the

most common response was the fact that it would be impossible; that amateur astronomers,

given the technology today, would be able to identify such claims with ease. This response

is only half valid, given the fact that they would only be able to observe one side of

the Moon! A lot of information is available to suggest that there are some structures

on the moon and also some type of operation occurring that�s unknown to the majority

of people on planet Earth. They could be human operations, extraterrestrial operations, or

joint human and extraterrestrial operations. If you are going to hide something from the

eyes of astronomers, the �dark side� of the Moon is the perfect place to do it.

The STARGATE project was one of multiple programs that the U.S. government undertook to examine

non-material science and �psi� phenomena like telepathy and telekinesis. It ran for

more than two decades, and a lot of information regarding the program has since been declassified

and opened for public viewing.

The program was used multiple times for successful intelligence collection, as outlined in a

paper published after the declassification in 1995:

�To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods,

and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories

has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon.

Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals

could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise.

. . . The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting

CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled

laboratory conditions.�

Remote viewing was one of their most successful programs under the STARGATE umbrella. Remote

viewing is the the ability of individuals to describe a remote geographical location

up to several hundred thousand kilometers away (or more) from their physical location.

This phenomenon has been confirmed by multiple studies, having repeated the same thing, which

is why the program ran in secret for more than two decades until it was declassified.

�Successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories

has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon.

Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals

could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise.

The CIA even participated as remote viewers themselves in order to critique the protocols.

CIA personnel generated successful target descriptions of sufficiently high quality

to permit blind matching of descriptions to targets by independent judges.�

A gentlemen by the name of Ingo Swann was able to successfully describe and view a ring

around Jupiter, a ring that scientists had no idea existed. This took place immediately

before the first ever flyby of Jupiter by NASA�s Pioneer 10 spacecraft, which confirmed

that the ring did actually exist. These results were published in advance of the rings�

discovery.

Ingo wrote plenty about the Moon and his findings on it. The fact that this man was closely

connected and often used by the intelligence community (2)(3) should sound some alarms

in realizing the importance of his work. Also, the fact that he successfully remote viewed

Jupiter before modern science could is astonishing.

Here�s what he had to say about the moon,

�It�s one thing to read about UFOs and stuff in the papers or in books. It is another

to hear rumours which say they have captured extraterrestrials and downed alien space craft.

But it�s quite another matter to find oneself in a situation which confirms everything.

I found towers, machinery, lights, buildings, humanoids busy at work on something I couldn�t

figure out .�

The implications of this information are huge, and we believe are spiritual in nature. For

multiple reasons, this seems like an educated interpretation.

We have a lot of work to do on ourselves here on planet Earth, and perhaps that�s all

tied into the ET phenomena in several different ways. All this and more is discussed exclusively

in our Explorers Lounge.

For more infomation >> WE'RE GOING BACK! CHINA TO BECOME THE FIRST NATION TO LAND ON THE DARK SIDE - Duration: 12:54.

-------------------------------------------

Hilarious Comics With Unexpectedly Dark Endings part III - Duration: 25:25.

Hilarious Comics With Unexpectedly Dark Endings part III

For more infomation >> Hilarious Comics With Unexpectedly Dark Endings part III - Duration: 25:25.

-------------------------------------------

Snapchat reacts to online criticism of new "After Dark" feature - Duration: 2:58.

For more infomation >> Snapchat reacts to online criticism of new "After Dark" feature - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

Coronation Street spoilers: Sean Tully homeless and ambushed by thugs in dark new twist - Duration: 2:33.

Coronation Street spoilers: Sean Tully homeless and ambushed by thugs in dark new twist

But his easy breezy life on the Cobbles is about to take a turn for the worst.

Coronation Street spoilers have given a first look at Seans new storyline, which will see him having to sleep rough.

The Underworld machinist will suffer a horrific attack at the hands of two thugs in a public toilet.

To make matters worse, Sean appears to be sleeping on the streets with a mystery woman.

The Corrie cast favourite can be seen sitting in a one-man tent, holding his head down in despair.

Seans best mate Fiz Stape (Jennie McAlpine) and landlord is nowhere to be seen as he hangs his head in sadness.

Seans poignant descent into darkness will occur in the summer.

The new plot – which has not been revealed entirely – was the brainchild of controversial Corrie boss Kate Oates.

Kate – who will be replaced by Emmerdales Iain MacLeod – has received criticism for her dark storylines, which include David Platts (Jack P Shepherd) rape and Pat Phelans (Conor McIntyre) murder spree.

Anthony doesnt seem to mind the twist though, as hes signed a year-long contract to stay on the ITV soap.

And after 15 years on Coronation Street he cant wait to get stuck in with more meaty storylines.

Coronation Street airs Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 7:30pm and 8:30pm on ITV.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét