Thứ Tư, 23 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 23 2018

U.S. Vice President Mike Pence has made it clear that Washington will make no concessions

to North Korea before it carries out a verifiable and irreversible denuclearization.

He also warned Pyongyang that it COULD end up like Libya.... if the Kim Jong-un regime

fails to reach a nuclear deal with the U.S. Kim Hyo-sun reports.

U.S. Vice President Mike Pence insists that no concessions will be made to North Korea

before it reaches the point of no return on its nuclear program.

Speaking with Fox News Radio on Tuesday,...

Pence stressed the U.S. will not give the North any rewards until the regime carries

out a verifiable and irreversible denuclearization.

He also explained the Trump administration's policy on North Korea remains the same,...

adding it will continue its economic and diplomatic sanctions campaign against the regime.

Pence also said Washington remains hopeful about the scheduled North Korea-U.S. summit

on June 12th.

His latest comments come a day after the U.S. Vice President issued a warning to Pyongyang.

Speaking to Fox News on Monday,...

Pence warned that the North would end up like Libya if it fails to reach a nuclear deal

with the U.S.,... adding the Trump administration will not tolerate a nuclear armed North Korea.

"This will only end like the Libyan model ended if Kim Jong-un doesn't make a deal...

President Trump made it clear: the United States of America, under his leadership, is

not going to tolerate the regime in North Korea possessing nuclear weapons and ballistic

missiles that threaten the United States and our allies."

While explaining that Washington is focused on reaching a satisfactory deal with the North,...

Pence added that he hopes North Korean leader Kim Jong-un will not let go of this great

opportunity for peace.

Kim Hyo-sun, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. will not make concessions to N. Korea before verifiable, irreversible denuclearization: Pence - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

US./ North Korea Summit Is In Jeopardy - Duration: 0:59.

For more infomation >> US./ North Korea Summit Is In Jeopardy - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

7 states sue to end DACA program - Duration: 5:14.

For more infomation >> 7 states sue to end DACA program - Duration: 5:14.

-------------------------------------------

Joe Arpaio running for U.S. Senate - Duration: 2:25.

For more infomation >> Joe Arpaio running for U.S. Senate - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

Border Patrol Agent Holds Two U.S. Citizens for Speaking Spanish | What's Trending Now! - Duration: 5:43.

A video taken by a Montana woman shows a Border Patrol officer question her and

her friend for speaking Spanish at a gas station, ignoring the fact that they are

American citizens. Hey, I'm Shira Lazar and welcome back to What's Trending. Be sure

to like this video and subscribe for more social media news daily.

Ana Suda and Mimi Hernandez were buying milk and eggs at a gas station when they

were stopped by a Border Patrol agent in Havre, Montana for speaking Spanish. Ana

Suda told NBC News: "He asked us where we were born so I looked at him and I

said, 'Are you serious?' He said, 'I'm very serious.'" That's when the woman took out

their phones and started recording the conversation. They accused the Border

Patrol agent of racial profiling and this was his answer. Ma'am, the reason I

asked you for ID is because I came in here and I saw that you guys are speaking Spanish,

which is very unheard of up here, so just running your name and date of birth...

Just because of our profile, right? Racial profile. It has nothing to do with that...

Okay, so he wasn't racially profiling because that would be bad, but

he took them aside because he thought there were minorities? That's called

racial profiling. They both waited for 40 minutes as the Border Patrol agent went

through their papers and were eventually released because they were indeed

American citizens. As Suda told Don Lemon on CNN, she was born in El Paso,

Texas and her friend in El Centro, California. That is, most people would

consider, I mean, that is racial profiling. Does he not understand that? And here's the

very, very, very important part of this entire thing. Speaking Spanish is not

illegal. It seems that more and more people feel entitled to harass people of

color, or Spanish speakers. Listen, this isn't necessarily new, but looking at our

current laws against minorities, and immigration in this country, as well as

our overall divisiveness around these issues, it's basically encouraging

racists to come out of the woodwork. Plus the rise of smartphones and social media

allow these horrible moments to be recorded and go viral

quickly. It's been only a week since Aaron Schlossberg, a lawyer in New York

City, was caught on camera threatening to call ICE on spanish-speaking workers. He

became really, really famous for that clip, and not necessarily in the

way he wanted. Why are you running, man? You don't want to stand by what you said?

He released an apology today where he said amongst other things, "I am not racist."

Okay, so let me be clear here. You call ICE on people speaking Spanish

because you don't think they should be in America, but you're not a racist? It's

time for me to read my favorite book - the dictionary! Racist (noun): a person who

shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races,

or who believes that a particular race is superior to another. There's a huge

issue here. Between Schlossberg's apology and the Border Agent's lack of

understanding of what racial profiling is, show something troubling. These two

people who were obviously racist, don't know that they're racist. That seems to

be common, and as much as the current climate has been blamed for douchebags

like Schlossberg, immigration officers have been taking liberties like these

throughout the Obama administration, even patrolling Greyhound buses, and according

to Vox, looking for signs to question an individual with "unusual behavior,

defensive body language, thick accents, and clothing style." So this is an

absolutely awful story,but it could have ended way worse. Since 2012,

ICE has detained and eventually released 1,480 people, who as it turns out, have had

no reason to keep detained, including children and citizens born outside the

country. Take, for example, the case of Davino Watson, a naturalized citizen kept

in a detention center for three years after ICE officials got his father, also

a citizen, confused with a different man. Or, Sergio Carrillo - an American born in

Mexico who gained citizenship as a teenager in 1994 and was detained for

three days even as his son presented information of his citizenship to ICE

who refused to acknowledge the documents. It wasn't until a lawyer presented ICE

with Carillo's passport that he was released. As Carrillo puts it: "For ICE,

it's like, 'Oops, we made a mistake,' but for me on the other end, it tears up your

life." And this is a powerful statement from U.S. District Judge J. McConnell: "Where

an individual's liberties at stake, a 50/50 success rate is not acceptable." Do

we really want to live in a country where a police force regularly harasses

other people for being non-white, or speaking a different language? This

recent incident, as you can imagine, has sparked a lot of conversation on social

media. @josephdaniel191 says: "It's frustrating to see stuff like this.

Especially when your family speaks Spanish and came from Mexico but earned

their rights to become U.S. citizens." @safdalumni says: "I don't know how I

would have handled this situation. I'm a fluent Spanish speaker and I speak to

all my family members in Spanish even though most speak English. It's what we

do. Don't know that I wouldn't be absolutely pissed if they ask to see my

"paperwork". And this from @LozanoSayra: "Being bilingual: 1. Helps me connect

cultures, 2. Makes me a better job candidate, 3. Makes learning a third

language easier, and 4. Makes me a target for deportation under the current

political climate." If you want to take action and make sure that people living

in America aren't detained for their race, accent, or speaking another language,

you can get in touch with your local representative. Just go to house.gov/

representatives or senate.com/senators. So what do you think? Was

a Border Patrol agent just doing their job, or is this an example of obvious

racial profiling? Let us know what you think in the comments below and be sure

to like and subscribe for more of What's Trending.

For more infomation >> Border Patrol Agent Holds Two U.S. Citizens for Speaking Spanish | What's Trending Now! - Duration: 5:43.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS Out Of South Korea. US Cancels B-52 Exercise Amid Tensions With North Korea - Duration: 2:59.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS Out Of South Korea. US Cancels B-52 Exercise Amid Tensions With North Korea - Duration: 2:59.

-------------------------------------------

US Military Sends USS Milius to Japan Ahead of Trump's North Korea Summit - Duration: 2:47.

For more infomation >> US Military Sends USS Milius to Japan Ahead of Trump's North Korea Summit - Duration: 2:47.

-------------------------------------------

Secretary Mike Pompeo testifying on State Department budget - Duration: 1:28.

For more infomation >> Secretary Mike Pompeo testifying on State Department budget - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

US Presses Turkey to Drop Plans to Buy Russia S-400 Air Defense Systems - Duration: 3:40.

For more infomation >> US Presses Turkey to Drop Plans to Buy Russia S-400 Air Defense Systems - Duration: 3:40.

-------------------------------------------

The risks of the North Korea summit for U.S.-South Korea relations - Duration: 8:11.

JUDY WOODRUFF: As we reported earlier, President Trump today voiced doubts about whether next

month's planned summit with North Korea's leader, Kim Jong-un, would proceed as planned.

As Nick Schifrin reports, Mr. Trump and his South Korean counterpart met today at a crucial

moment.

NICK SCHIFRIN: In the Oval Office today, President Trump blended a handful of hope with a pinch

of perspective, hope that his planned summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un could

create a historic peace.

DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States: He has a chance to do something that maybe

has never been done before.

He will be safe.

He will be happy.

His country will be rich.

North Korea really has the chance to be a great country.

And I think they should seize the opportunity, and we will soon find out whether or not they

want to do that.

NICK SCHIFRIN: And that perspective, that maybe the summit won't even happen.

DONALD TRUMP: There are certain conditions that we want.

And I think we will get those conditions.

And if we don't, we don't have the meeting.

There's a chance that it will work out.

There's a chance, there's very substantial chance that it won't work out.

That doesn't mean it won't work out over a period of time.

But it may not work out for June 12.

NICK SCHIFRIN: North Korea enters the summit presenting itself as a full-fledged nuclear

state.

Whether and how the country denuclearizes is at the negotiation's core.

North Korean officials have expressed interest in slow, step-by-step denuclearization and

step-by-step American incentives.

President Trump said today he'd prefer, but wouldn't insist, on swift denuclearization.

DONALD TRUMP: It would certainly be better if it were all in one.

Does it have to be?

I don't think I want to totally commit myself.

But all in one would be a lot better, or at least, for physical reasons, over a very short

period of time.

NICK SCHIFRIN: The go-between for Trump and Kim has been South Korean President Moon Jae-in,

who pushes peace in part by praising the president.

MOON JAE-IN, South Korean President (through translator): I have no doubt you will be able

to accomplish a historic feat that no one has been able to achieve in the decades past.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Senior administration officials describe this moment to the "NewsHour" as

brinksmanship between two men who don't want to be the one to cancel or be canceled on.

President Trump said his blend of hope and perspective comes from his past experience

in business.

DONALD TRUMP: I have made a lot of deals.

I know deals I think better than anyone knows deals.

You never really know.

NICK SCHIFRIN: As of now, the administration continues to plan as if the summit will happen,

but a senior official suggests that reporters who plan on going book refundable tickets.

We take a closer look now at today's meeting and the prospects for next month's summit

with Balbina Hwang, who served in the State Department during the George W. Bush administration,

and is now a visiting professor at Georgetown University.

And Jeffrey Lewis is the director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at Middlebury

Institute of International Studies at Monterey.

He is also founding publisher of the blog Arms Control Wonk.

Welcome to you both.

Jeffrey Lewis, if I could start with you, why is President Moon of South Korea here?

What's his mission?

JEFFREY LEWIS, Director, East Asia Non-Proliferation Program, Monterey Institute of International

Studies: I think he has one overriding mission, and that's to save the summit between President

Trump and Kim Jong-un.

From President Moon's perspective, he wants to improve relations with North Korea, but

he can't do that unless the United States is also doing the same thing.

So, if he wants what he wants, he has to get that summit to happen.

NICK SCHIFRIN: And, Balbina Hwang, is that right?

Is President Moon here to save the summit?

BALBINA HWANG, Georgetown University: Oh, absolutely, and not only.

President Moon has absolutely one mission, and that is actually to prevent war on the

Korean Peninsula.

NICK SCHIFRIN: And trying to keep some of the rhetoric that we heard last year down.

I want to play some comments for both of you by the national security adviser, John Bolton,

to FOX News about four weeks ago.

JOHN BOLTON, U.S. National Security Adviser: We have very much in mind the Libya model

from 2003-2004.

There are obviously differences.

The Libyan program was much smaller, but that was basically the agreement that we made.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Bolton is talking about a deal about denuclearization from 2003.

But, of course, we know in 2011 he ended up dead in a ditch.

So, Jeffrey Lewis, what was Bolton's intention by bringing up the Libya model?

JEFFREY LEWIS: Well, you know, in his memoir, Bolton bragged about using diplomacy to actually

advance other goals.

So he bragged about sending a delegation off to Pyongyang, feeling that he had sabotaged

them and knowing that it would collapse.

My guess is that he was bringing up Gadhafi not because it really is a model for disarmament,

but because he knew it would annoy the North Koreans.

And, in fact, it did.

I think we saw that the North Korean statement the other day singled Bolton out and made

it very clear that Libya wasn't a precedent they liked.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Balbina Hwang, is that right?

Was the national security adviser perhaps trying scuttle this summit or somehow convince

North Koreans that the U.S. wasn't serious about diplomacy?

BALBINA HWANG: Well, absolutely.

Libya is a red line that everybody knows is something that North Korea will not accept.

Now, on the other hand, it is also the sort of extreme that you set up going into negotiations,

so that you know that that is the furthest line that you know that is the extent to which

is the hard line, the extreme.

Now, we also know that President Trump is the negotiator.

That's how he presents himself.

That's how he is the deal-maker.

And when President Trump is going into the summit, that is what he says that he's going

to do.

He's going to come out with a deal.

And so that is how he is going to go in, and that's exactly how he wants to set it up.

And so North Korea is obviously going to come out and say, we're not going to go into a

summit with this kind of a deal.

So of course he's going to do that.

And I think that that's exactly how Bolton is setting this up.

NICK SCHIFRIN: So you're suggesting it actually could help, that this is something important,

whether the U.S. public or for the U.S. simply to have this hard line going into the summit,

that it's helpful?

BALBINA HWANG: Exactly.

NICK SCHIFRIN: OK.

Jeffrey Lewis, should there be a summit?

We heard a lot of doubt about this today.

And what do you expect to come out of the summit if it indeed goes forward on the 12th?

JEFFREY LEWIS: Well, I think the answer to whether there should be a summit is, it depends,

and I think it depends on whether the president goes in with realistic expectations.

I don't think the North Koreans are going to offer up their nuclear weapons.

I don't think that they're planning on disarming.

And so the real question is, are the North Koreans going to offer something short of

that, a prolonged moratorium on testing missiles, a continued pledge not to test nuclear weapons,

maybe a pledge not to export those technologies?

So you have to look at the likely North Korean concessions, what they're likely to put on

the table and then ask, is that something you want?

The nightmare scenario for me is that John Bolton's counsel in private is not preparing

the president for this, that he's getting him ready to expect a kind of surrender from

Kim.

And when that doesn't happen, will the president settle for less or we will he throw a tantrum

and walk out?

NICK SCHIFRIN: Balbina Hwang, should there be lowered expectations for the summit?

BALBINA HWANG: Well, is the summit really about the process of denuclearization and

disarmament, or is the summit really about politics and is this really about a political

process?

And I would argue that this really is about a political process, and if so, then, yes,

there should be a summit.

And, possibly, there will be one.

NICK SCHIFRIN: Jeffrey Lewis, quickly, is there any risk in this summit to the U.S.

alliance with South Korea?

JEFFREY LEWIS: Well, I think there is some risk.

You know, we're entering into this period where there are a lot of tensions.

President Moon is a progressive, but he's also quite nationalistic.

I think he's quite negative about the U.S. presence in the country.

And President Trump has insisted that South Korea pay more.

So my fundamental concern is, if the summit goes badly, we don't want a situation where

President Moon decides that the big threat isn't Kim Jong-un; it's Donald Trump.

NICK SCHIFRIN: That's interesting.

Balbina Hwang, do some people in South Korea believe the threat is not Kim Jong-un, but

actually Donald Trump?

BALBINA HWANG: I think this is the single biggest underestimated risk, is the alliance.

And this is the one thing that we are not looking at.

The whole summit is, unfortunately, played as between the United States and North Korea.

And what we're not looking at is the third actor, which is South Korea and the U.S. alliance

with South Korea.

NICK SCHIFRIN: And, therefore, is there risk to this alliance, especially if the summit

doesn't go well?

BALBINA HWANG: Absolutely.

That's right.

And, especially if the summit doesn't even occur at all, the alliance could be at risk.

NICK SCHIFRIN: All right.

Balbina Hwang, Jeffrey Lewis, thank you very much.

BALBINA HWANG: Thank you.

For more infomation >> The risks of the North Korea summit for U.S.-South Korea relations - Duration: 8:11.

-------------------------------------------

Meghan Markle's ultimate ambition is to be president of the U.S.! why not? - Duration: 3:27.

For more infomation >> Meghan Markle's ultimate ambition is to be president of the U.S.! why not? - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

Rubio on fears China is winning trade war with the US - Duration: 5:59.

For more infomation >> Rubio on fears China is winning trade war with the US - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

Sen. John McCain wants us to see we are more alike than different - Duration: 10:23.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Republican Senator John McCain is known as a maverick, familiar with tough

fights, from prison camps in Vietnam to the floor of the U.S. Senate.

Recently, he has been staying close to the Arizona ranch he calls home, as he undergoes

treatment for brain cancer.

But he still speaks his mind.

And there are new glimpses this month into McCain's life and thinking.

He and his family are part of a new HBO documentary, "John McCain: For Whom the Bell Tolls," which

debuts next Monday.

Here's a look.

SEN.

JOHN MCCAIN (R), Arizona: Come on, Verma (ph).

Come on, honey.

JACK MCCAIN, Son of John McCain: I got a phone call from my mom that said: "Jack, you're

going to see some stuff in the news.

Your father has brain cancer.

I'm with him right now.

He knows his diagnosis, and he's the same as he's always been.

He said, 'All right, let's push forward.'"

SEN.

JOHN MCCAIN: You know, these doctors keep talking to me about people who, if you tell

them the truth, and then they just give up and die, that you really want to -- and I

keep saying them, just tell me.

Just tell me.

That's all I want to know, you know?

Some say, well, it's not good.

And I say, well, you know it's just (EXPLETIVE DELETED) and it really drives me crazy.

But then I talk to other doctor friends of mine and say that most people, that's not

what they want to hear.

Why wouldn't they want to hear, you know?

Why wouldn't they want to spend a few more days here, you know?

JUDY WOODRUFF: McCain's battle with cancer is also ever-present, whether explicitly or

implicitly, in a new memoir out today.

There are reflections about living and past decisions, but it also makes clear that McCain

still has plenty to say about America, American society, and politics in the age of President

Trump.

It is called "The Restless Wave," and McCain co-wrote it with one of his close longtime

aides, Mark Salter, who joins me now from New York.

Mark Salter, thank you for being with us.

Give us an update on how...

(CROSSTALK)

JUDY WOODRUFF: Thank you -- how Senator McCain is doing.

MARK SALTER, Co-Author, "The Restless Wave: Good Times, Just Causes, Great Fights, and

Other Appreciations": He's hanging in there.

He's fighting, working hard at getting stronger.

He had an operation a couple weeks ago that knocked the wind out of him a little bit.

But he's back home, and he's working on getting stronger and still staying engaged with his

office and doing all the things he wants to be doing right now.

JUDY WOODRUFF: You have been writing books with him for, what, almost 20 years.

This is your seventh book together.

MARK SALTER: That's right.

JUDY WOODRUFF: This book sounds like -- it reads like he's still got a lot rolling around

in his mind that he wants to get out there.

Restless wave, what did he mean by that?

MARK SALTER: Well, it's a line from the Navy hymn "Eternal Father."

It refers to eternal father, strong to save, whose arm hath bound the restless wave.

And most people know who know John McCain know him to be a very restless individual,

and only God can restrain him.

So, we thought that was an appropriate title, under the circumstances.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But a lot to get off his chest in this book.

MARK SALTER: He did.

The book -- we had started working on the book before his diagnosis.

And it was a little bit different of a book.

It was going to concentrate mostly on foreign affairs and national security.

But he wanted to write something more personal and tell stories about the causes that matter

most to him and to write about what America means to him and what America means to the

world.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, one of the many things he writes about -- he rally covers his entire

public career -- he writes about choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate in 2008.

He takes responsibility for any of the problems in that campaign and her role in it, but he

also says that he wishes he had chosen Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman as his running mate.

How much does that bother him?

MARK SALTER: Well, I think that was his first choice.

He wanted to do it.

He was persuaded by his aides and from senior members of the party that it would cause a

divided convention and a challenge perhaps on the floor to the nomination of his vice

presidential pick, and was convinced not to do it.

He would have -- looking back, he wished he had stuck with it.

That's not to say he regrets choosing Governor Palin.

There is a distinction there.

And I think people have mixed that up a little bit.

But it's not.

Once he decided or was convinced that he couldn't pick Senator Lieberman, he chose Governor

Palin, and he never regretted it publicly or privately.

He's never said a word of regret about it.

JUDY WOODRUFF: He writes at some length about how much he has loved serving in the Senate.

He makes that very clear.

His friendships across the partisan aisle.

Why has that been so important to him?

MARK SALTER: Well, he served there for over 30 years now, a long time.

And even before that he was the Senate's -- the Navy's Senate liaison officer.

And he got to know some of the lions of the Senate back in the '70s, Scoop Jackson, Barry

Goldwater, John Tower, traveled with them overseas quite a bit, had bipartisan friendships,

became good friends with some of the then younger members, Gary Hart, Bill Cohen, Joe

Biden.

And he's just -- it's a place that he's seen do enormous amount of good and work together

collaboratively to make progress on the problems of our time, something that he's worried is

getting a little lost now.

JUDY WOODRUFF: On the -- moving around, there's so much in this book, Mark Salter.

At one point, he does write about getting a copy of the so-called Steele dossier, the

report written by the former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, turning it over

to then-FBI Director Comey.

It is clear that he takes the Russia interference in the last election seriously.

What does he think about how other Republicans see that?

MARK SALTER: Well, he thinks most of his colleagues in the Senate take it pretty seriously.

I'm sure he's been a it a little -- like many people who worry about Putin and Putin's challenge

to the U.S. and his challenge to American allies, he probably worries a little bit about

some people in the House Intelligence Committee not taking it that seriously.

But he takes it seriously.

He's had a pretty good sense of Putin.

Going back all the way to the late '90s, he has been warning about him.

So, he thinks probably China is our long-term challenge, you know, over the next generation

or the work, but our immediate problem is Vladimir Putin.

And he would like the see members of Congress in his party and the Democratic Party confront

that challenge honestly and forcefully.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So much of this book, or at least a good chunk of it, reads like what

he is standing up -- what he stands for is in opposition to what President Trump stands

for.

He talks about being a champion of compromise, being someone who believes in working with

the other side, and toning down the harsh rhetoric.

And let's air just a little bit of what he himself read from the audio version of this

book at the end.

MARK SALTER: Sure.

SEN.

JOHN MCCAIN: Before I leave, I would like to see our politics begin to return to the

purposes and practices that distinguish our history from the history of other nations.

I would like to see us recover our sense that we are more alike than different.

We're citizens of a republic made of shared ideals, forged in a new world to replace the

tribal enmities that tormented the old one.

Even in times of political turmoil such as these, we share that awesome heritage and

the responsibility to embrace it.

Whether we think each other right or wrong in our views on the issues of the day, we

owe each other our respect, so long as our character merits respect.

And as long as we share, for all our differences, for all the rancorous debates that enliven

and sometimes demean our politics, a mutual devotion to the ideals our nation was conceived

of hold, that all are created equal, and liberty and equal justice are the natural rights of

all.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Mark Salter, that's a very different message from what's in the political

atmosphere right now.

Why did he want to get that out?

MARK SALTER: Well, you know, he has served in uniform and in public office.

He's served this country for 60 years, quite a long stretch of time.

And serving this country to him has meant serving her ideals, to see them advance in

the world and to see them safe here at home.

That's been the most just cause of his life, and a cause that he believes has given his

life honor and purpose.

So, he is obviously concerned when he thinks that we're losing sight of that, that we're

-- whether it's, whatever you call it, nativism or America-first nationalism, that is only

concerned about getting what advantages there are in the world for us, and to hell with

the rest of humanity.

I don't want anyone to think, and he wouldn't want anyone to think that this book is just

an anti-Donald Trump diatribe.

It's not.

They have differences on many issues that are very important to the senator, and he

discusses those issues quite forthrightly.

But the book is about a great deal more than that.

It's about his love of this country and what it means to him and what it means to the world

and what he hopes it will continue to mean to the world in the future he may not be here

to see.

JUDY WOODRUFF: How many of his Republican colleagues in the Senate does he think share

those views?

MARK SALTER: The vast majority of them.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But why aren't we hearing from them, does he think?

MARK SALTER: Oh, I think you do.

And they do -- a lot of the work -- you know, it's always the controversies that get all

the attention, for obvious reasons, but take a look at the committee he chairs, the Armed

Services Committee.

That -- every year, year after year, that committee reports out its bill, the defense

spending -- authorization bill, almost always unanimously, always in a bipartisan fashion.

Everybody works collaboratively, with a sense that American -- America's leadership of the

world is important to us and important to the world.

That doesn't get as much attention as noisier, more confrontational or controversial statements

and actions on the part of some members of Congress, but it's more the norm than not.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Is he hopeful for the country's future?

MARK SALTER: He believes -- yes, he believes this country is a match for its challenges

in the present and in the future.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Mark Salter, who wrote the book with John McCain "The Restless Wave:

Good Times, Just Causes, Great Fights, and Other Appreciations."

Mark Salter, we thank you.

MARK SALTER: Thank you, Judy.

Appreciate it.

JUDY WOODRUFF: And that book is out today.

For more infomation >> Sen. John McCain wants us to see we are more alike than different - Duration: 10:23.

-------------------------------------------

China is taking advantage of us now: Joe Lieberman - Duration: 7:56.

For more infomation >> China is taking advantage of us now: Joe Lieberman - Duration: 7:56.

-------------------------------------------

President Moon meets U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. National Security Advisor - Duration: 1:51.

Prior to his summit with U.S. President Donald Trump, South Korean President Moon Jae-in

met with two key U.S. officials to discuss the upcoming Pyongyang-Washington summit.

Cha Sang-mi reports.

As his first official itinerary in Washington, President Moon Jae-in met with U.S. Secretary

of State Mike Pompeo and U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton.

According to pool reports, President Moon expressed his apppreciation for President

Trump's top advisors for foreign affairs and national security as they prepare for the

upcoming Pyongyang-Washington summit.

"I'm very much aware that you both play key roles in the U.S. government's foreign and

security policies, and in particular, on Korea as a whole.

We're embarking on a very important period that will determine the future of Korea and

the Korean Peninsula.

The Korean public has very high expectations of you."

During their 50-minute-long meeting, President Moon called on Pompeo and Bolton to speed

up preparations to make the Pyongyang-Washington summit a successful one that ultimately puts

all parties on the road to the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

"This is our highest priority.

We're trying to get this right for your country, for our country, and for the world.

And I have a great new counterpart Director Seo, a great counterpart of mine, and we are

looking forward to working alongside you to achieve a really good outcome with North Korea."

Regarding the recent negative shift in tone from Pyongyang, President Moon stressed that

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's determination to hold a successful summit with the U.S.

is resolute nevertheless.

The meeting came a couple of hours before President Moon sat down for his face-to-face

with President Trump in the Oval Office.

Cha Sang-mi, Arirang News.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét