Thứ Ba, 22 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 22 2018

I brand-new tonight after a meeting between Trump the FBI director Chris Rae

rod Rosenstein and other top Intel officials the White House is saying

President Trump and the Department of Justice are now asking the Inspector

General to investigate the Obama administration and the spying they did

on the Trump campaign and the White House is also revealing tonight that

chief of staff John Kelly is general Kelly is setting up a meeting for

Congress so they will see the documents that constitutionally they have been

asking for and the DOJ has been obstructing in stonewalling really I'll

believe it when I see those documents now this is the same material that rod

Rosenstein has refused to turn over for months now he his name by the way you

want to keep an eye on I'll have more on Rosenstein in a minute now first what's

unfolding about the deep state is so dramatic so shocking but at the same

time so very predictable given everything we have now been uncovering

for over 18 months now we are now seeing the cracks in the deep state in this dam

it's about to burst and all of this information is now beginning to cascade

out even the New York Times The Washington Post are now confirming just

in the last week everything we have been uncovering again for 18 months it is the

biggest abuse of power corruption scandal it makes Watergate look like a

parking ticket now the house Intel committee chair Devin noonas he's

reacting by saying this is crossing a serious red line very important if they

ran a spy ring or an informant ring and they were paying people within the Trump

campaign if any of that is true that is an absolute redline there is not an

honest person in this country that thinks it's okay if sources informants

whatever you want to call them go around and start passing out money all over the

globe to do what to to secretly put yourself into a presidential campaign

that's not acceptable in this country that's not acceptable in the United

States of America Chairman Nunez is also there might be more than one FBI

informant you've got to be kidding me watch this nobody was ever interested in

an informant we asked for specific documents that we still have not

received from the Department of Justice so they continued to leak out things

about this informant and we don't know if there's one informant or more

informants because there's so much out there now it's really getting tough to

follow and all we're asking for is give us the documentation that you used to

start this investigation hand it over these type of tactics

spying on an opposition party in an election year are you kidding me this is

what you'd see in the former Soviet Union

Venezuela not the United States of America just look at this quote from The

Wall Street Journal editorial board listen to this we cannot recall recall a

similar case even the J Edgar Hoover days when the FBI decided it needed to

snoop on a presidential campaign now this is the same J Edgar Hoover who was

notorious for having files on just about everyone in Washington that is how

serious all of this is even Clinton aide and advisor

mark Penny's work with the Clintons for 20 years is calling out this scandal for

what it is this is a game-changing moment and Penn has worked for the

Clintons forever and served as Hillary's chief strategist for her campaign in

2008 he is now calling this witch hunt for what it is and literally writing an

op-ed in the hill stopping Robert Muller to protect us all

stunning headline Penn goes on to explain how the facts are now undeniable

Muller is on a crusade to get the President of the United States to

overturn a duly elected president he uses the term deep state that it's real

that the FBI rigged the Clinton investigation and then targeted Donald

Trump and his campaign when he was president-elect and now president and

Penn explained more on this on the story with Martha McCallum earlier tonight

take a look I think that the inspector general's report is coming out I think

noon is is finding out like what were their origins of the investigation

there doesn't seem to be a real concrete intelligence origin for this

investigation and without a foundation one wonders what did we spend an entire

year on what did we disrupt everyone who was in the campaign everyone who's in

the administration and also former Solicitor General for the u.s. Ted Olson

he's out with a new piece where he explains how Robert Muller's witch-hunt

could be setting up a massive constitutional crisis and of course

investigative reporter cheryl atkinson she has a defining piece on all of this

literally called the collusion against trump an entire timeline she breaks down

every single key moment in this entire massive abuse of power scandal we will

refer to this throughout history because it's been going on for 18 months now the

mainstream media even they finally are starting to catch on and admit that what

we've been reporting and what others on the show have been reporting and other

people what we've been covering we're now being proven right they have to

admit it look at this headline from The Washington Post over the weekend secret

FBI source for Russia investigation met with three Trump advisors during the

campaign here's a USA Today report look at this cover it says and even by the

way even fake news liberals CNN they can't ignore all the facts all the

evidence okay it's taken them well over a year but finally the media is starting

to realize that they have missed the single biggest story in their lifetime

as they pursued Russia and Russia stormy now it's a massive abuse of power we

first reported on this March 7th 2017 about FISA surveillance of the Trump

campaign President Trump he has every single right tonight to be outraged

about what has happened he has every right to want to know the truth you the

American people need to know the truth we need to expose all of this criminal

behavior all of these deep state actors need to be exposed and all of them held

accountable the Deputy Attorney General rod Rosenstein okay he's quick to

respond to president Trump demanding the Department of Justice get to the bottom

of it all so Rosenstein he's tried to make himself out to be a hero but it's a

total farce why Rosenstein is doing what he always

does and that is protecting all of his deep state friends of the Deputy

Attorney General he knows that by referring this to the

inspector general it will buy them a year to 18 months and protect all these

deep state actors now it's gonna take Michael Horowitz well over a year

we don't have over a year to uncover this we need a full FBI DOJ rank and

file field office investigation into all of this because what they're trying to

do is slowly leak out this information a slow bleed to cover themselves it's all

a cya and remember they know what's out there

they know they're about to get caught this is all about controlling the

narrative spinning the narrative trying to protect themselves and they probably

learned a thing or two from Hillary about acid washing hard drives we've got

to be careful now there's another major component to all of this Rosenstein

knows that the Inspector General he doesn't have any real prosecutorial

power horowitz can't convene a grand jury

he cannot indict people he could only give criminal referrals like in the case

of Andrew McKay but on top of all of that as we're seeing with this IG report

on the Clinton email investigation the FBI the DOJ both get to review and try

and refute facts and redact information again probably falsely in the name of

national security we have been saying Congress needs to

see these documents we have checks and balances separation of powers co-equal

branches of government and you know what they are purposely obstructing and it

looks like some of this might start to happen all right Sarah Carter she'll

join us in a few minutes breaking another explosive story tonight here's

the headline concealed FISA documents may hold the key to trump surveillance

and what Sarah is reporting a number of very key details that rod Rosenstein he

signed the final FISA warrant you know using the fake phony dossiers the bulk

of information why to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter page using the

unverified never corroborated Clinton bought and paid for foreign national put

together dossier of Russian lie now Sarah is also reporting the back in

April the FBI refused to turn over documents that chairman Nunez and others

have been asking for you know phony claims of national security risks and as

we have seen it's one excuse to Stonewall after another all to prevent

Congress from knowing the truth and fulfilling their constitutional role and

chairman Nunez while he's now putting his foot down and in this standoff with

Rosenstein and the DOJ good for Devin Nunez take a look we had a productive

what I thought was a productive meeting and then after that meeting they've done

nothing but leak and leak and leak now we don't know exactly who it is over the

Department of Justice or FBI I'm not pinning any blame on people but we're

not going to go to another meeting where we don't get documents and then the

meeting leaks out now the Chairman is getting close the entire truth is now

starting to come out thankfully by the way despite Rosenstein stonewalling and

now because of all of these new developments you have deep state actors

former Oh communists voting John Brennan how we ever became CIA director is

beyond any comprehension I have we know no liar James clapper Sally Yates we

know her political agenda they're all losing their minds because all of them

are about to be exposed Brennan lashing out a president Trump

tweeting Senator McConnell speaker Ryan if mr. Trump continues along this

disastrous path you'll dare major responsibility for the harm to our

democracy by the way we're a republic you do a great disservice to the nation

a Republican Party if you continue to enable mr. Trump's self-serving actions

now Brennan is up to his eyeballs in all of this I am certain that's going to be

exposed and as we have been saying on this program he's been lying about his

involvement with this Clinton bought and paid for dossier for months and he lied

in front of Congress and as for James clapper

he's ensnared in the dossier scandal also and clapper Oh what is his response

just like Yates just like Brennan let's go after the president and attack him I

think that's actually very disturbing assault on the independence the

Department of Joe and I think when the president this

president any president tries to use the department justice is kind of a private

investigator a body that's not good for the country the big thing here is this

is not about spying on it on his campaign it's about what the Russians

are doing were they attempting to infiltrate the campaign and that was the

concern and that was it in my my belief is what the focus of this whole activity

was about the same clapper bragged about the FBI spying on the Trump campaign and

said it was a good thing this is problematic and then there's good old

sally aides who signed off on yes one of the FISA warrants like Rosenstein and

was emailing with Andrew Weissman the most corrupt member of Muller's team

after she recused refused to enforce the travel ban Yates was also trashing the

president why to save and protect herself

watch this Donald Trump himself accusing the Obama administration of improperly

targeting his campaign for an investigation what's your response to

everything you've heard over the weekend well obviously I'm not going to comment

on the specific facts there it's really up to the Department of Justice to

decide what information should be made public with respect to that but you know

I think what we're seeing here is the president has just taken his all-out

assault on the rule of law to a new level and this time he is ordering up an

investigation of the investigators who are examining his own campaign you know

that's really shocking the hard-hitting interview by liberal Joe now all three

of these deep State players are scared out of their minds they're directly

implicated in all of this so it's time to ask what did they all know when did

they all know it and just like I've been saying about their deep state friend

James Comey who by the way James I warned you you had the right to remain

silent you didn't listen anyway instead of running their mouths

well they might want to now begin to lawyer up and many of them are yeah

James Comey hired three lawyers the three people he leaked documents two

great attorney-client privilege for everybody but me

anyway another big development to tell you about tonight the

soon-to-be-released DOJ IG report on the Clinton email server investigation is

expected to slam FBI leaders just like call me Andrew McCabe for taking weeks

to review emails that were found on luma Aberdeen's shared computer with Anthony

Weiner and the IG report is supposed to come out very soon and if the Inspector

General Horowitz does his job and his 500 employees come--and McCabe should be

very worried tonight all right a lot of ground to cover

you

For more infomation >> Breaking: Hannity: The 'deep state' dam is about to burst - Duration: 14:15.

-------------------------------------------

After Obama Left US Town With Poisonous Water For 3 Years, Look What Trump Did In A Few Months - Duration: 5:46.

After Obama Left US Town With Poisonous Water For 3 Years, Look What Trump Did In A Few

Months When Barack Obama was sworn into office, he

promised America that he would bring her back from the depths of hell, and put us back on

the map.

He persuaded A LOT of people that he was the guy for the job.

The commander and chief of the greatest country on earth is supposed to make sure that ALL

Americans are taken care of, and protected before, and after any major event.

That's not what Obama did for the residents of Flint, Michigan.

Luckily, America elected a man that would do just that.

No, it wasn't Barack Obama.

President Trump is one of the only Presidents to keep the promises he made on the campaign

trail.

Flint, Michigan is a suburb North West of Detriot.

The population of Flint is around 100,000 people.

The city of Flint has had its ups and downs like almost every city, but the biggest effect

on Flint has been the Auto Industry.

Buick provided thousands of jobs for people as well as GM in Detriot.

With the Buick lot going under, and GM helping bring down the greater Detriot economy, the

people of Flint felt it couldn't get any worse.

But it Did.

The residents of Flint woke up to the startling news that the water they were drinking was

contaminated with high levels of lead.

This was caused in 2014 when the drinking water source for the city was changed to the

Flint River.

The reason?

Poor city management of money.

Like most every liberal leaning towns, the Democratic leadership failed to pay the bills

and was forced to switch.

Scientific studies proved that the water was in fact contaminated with lead and was present

in the current water supply.

A federal state of emergency was declared in January of 2016.

Everyone in the city of Flint was told to use bottles of water that had been brought

in instead of drinking anything from the faucets.

Barack Obama promised he would tackle Flint, and hold the people who caused this disaster

accountable.

Lik always, Obama was just pandering for political points.

He was going to leave the issue to the next President who he thought was going to be Hillary

Clinton.

Hillary Clinton traveled to Flint during her campaign and talked about how much she cared

for the people of Flint, and how she was going to make sure she took care of the people there

if she were to become President.

It's almost as if she told them…

vote for me and you will get free stuff, or vote for him, and he will let you all d*e.Under

authority granted the agency by the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation

Act of 2016, the EPA issued a $100 million grant to the beleaguered city of Flint, Michigan,

to help in the effort at replacing the city's badly corroded and lead-tainted system of

water pipes.Some progressive critics of President Donald Trump have pointed to his proposed

budget cuts at the Environmental Protection Agency as proof that he is a terrible president

who doesn't care about ensuring that Americans have clean air and water.

However, the recent report from The Daily Caller about Trump's EPA grant just did

throw that narrative into a tailspin.

"The people of Flint and all Americans deserve a more responsive federal government," said

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt in an agency news release.

"EPA will especially focus on helping Michigan improve Flint's water infrastructure as

part of our larger goal of improving America's water infrastructure.""We are excited

and very grateful to receive these much-needed funds," Flint Mayor Karen Weaver said.

"The City of Flint being awarded a grant of this magnitude in such a critical time

of need will be a huge benefit."

"As we prepare to start the next phase of the FAST Start pipe replacement program, these

funds will give us what we need to reach our goal of replacing 6,000 pipes this year and

make other needed infrastructure improvements," she added.

"We look forward to the continued support of the EPA and the federal government."

As part of the deal, the state of Michigan matched 20 percent of the grant, pitching

in $20 million.

Hillary Clinton wouldn't have done anything to help the people of Flint.

How do we know this?

There isn't ONE TIME that Hillary Clinton has traveled back to Flint to check on the

people she promised so much to.

Never once has any of HER people gone back to help try and make a difference with the

Clinton Foundation.

Afterall, they're there to help people in need right?

Wrong.

The Clinton Foundation was purposely created to keep the Clinton's wealthy.

The people of Flint are happy to know that someone is finally taking action in their

city.

President Trump is fulfilling a campaign promise once again and making sure the people of Flint

have safe water to drink and use in their everyday lives.

The Democrats have done nothing for Michigan, and will never do anything.

The state was once a hotbed for new ideas and a booming economy.

After 60 years of Democrat rule, the city of Detroit is crumbling, and the state is

in disrepair.

This might be why President Trump won the state of Michigan in 2016.

For more infomation >> After Obama Left US Town With Poisonous Water For 3 Years, Look What Trump Did In A Few Months - Duration: 5:46.

-------------------------------------------

JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:39.

For more infomation >> JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:39.

-------------------------------------------

Is the United States too lawsuit happy? - Duration: 1:45.

For more infomation >> Is the United States too lawsuit happy? - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

Iran Punches US Secretary Of State, Decided To Stay in Syria - Duration: 2:34.

For more infomation >> Iran Punches US Secretary Of State, Decided To Stay in Syria - Duration: 2:34.

-------------------------------------------

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivers remarks on "After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy." - Duration: 26:07.

For more infomation >> Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivers remarks on "After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy." - Duration: 26:07.

-------------------------------------------

Lou Dobbs:What created the US trade deficit with China? - Duration: 5:23.

and what about trade well Treasury secretary Stephen minuchin says what the

hell about trade steel and aluminum tariffs after his lead delegation have

been suspended as the negotiations with China have wrapped up the secretary

saying tariffs u.s. tariffs Trump tariffs can be put back on the table if

there's no progress made in reducing the 375 billion dollar trade deficit between

the two countries and joining us now Gordon Chang Daily Beast's columnist and

author of nuclear showdown North Korea takes on the world and China obviously

taking on the world your thoughts about the Venusian negotiated trade agreement

or non trade agreement with the Chinese yeah this does not have the hallmarks of

the president this looks like Steven minuchin we have a framework we don't

know the details yet but nonetheless it doesn't look good loo because basically

the Chinese have agreed to do what they should do and we are not going to put on

those section 301 tariffs meant to stop China's theft of intellectual property

and we're probably going to give relief to ZTE so let me see if I got this right

so there will be no tariffs on aluminum and steel dumping and by the Chinese

into this country or from anyone else apparently ZTE will suddenly be given a

pass for doing business for seven years with the Iranians and North Koreans

without imposition of any kind of penalty whatsoever and they can still

steal six hundred billion dollars worth of intellectual property from the United

States and preserve an almost 400 billion dollar trade deficit is that by

the is that basically where we are steven minuchin says it's good for us

Lou but yes you're right that's where the deal is right now in fact it's just

incredible to think that this the minutia nor anyone working for this

president would come up with that kind of nonsense I want to just show

everybody something if I may we were hearing a lot of talk folks about from

the minutia and others about sorghum and soybeans and our exports to the

to the Chinese let's take a look at the exports that we send to China right now

if we may let off by soybean some planes aircraft integrated circuits gas

turbines some scrap metal goes down the line now let's take a look at what we do

with the European Union aircraft Machinery pharmaceuticals

optical and medical equipment electric machinery let's look at Germany

particularly the mercantilist the leading mercantilist of the European

Union civilian aircraft in parts passenger cars new and used

pharmaceuticals medical equipment chemicals I mean we look like a

third-world nation in what we export to China and they're reducing not a single

tear not a single barrier to US exports yeah the real problem here is that

you've got industrial policy in China the made in China 2025 initiative the

13th five-year plan and we've got of course all the theft and the stealing

and the non-tariff barriers we got to eliminate those Lou because those are

the ones that are causing the trade deficit the president campaigned on

smart government trading and he said he couldn't blame the Chinese because they

were outsmarting us they just took his trade delegation and spanked them in

Beijing I mean it's that simple they might as well have been there with

peddlers carts with jars of sorghum in sacks of soybeans I mean it's pathetic

what they did yeah I mean we got taken to the cleaners and this I hope that

because this isn't final the president is going to intervene you know he did

actually speak to the head of the Chinese trade delegation a couple days

ago I think that's because he does see the problem there and I think that we're

gonna get a better trade deal but only because of the president because Steve

minuchin has an idea that you'd be nice to the Chinese they will reciprocate

we've tried that for about two decades now it doesn't work I think more than

being nice he basically just said you know I surrender I'll give you whatever

you want I mean it wasn't a negotiation I was a status check and the status said

you know we're gonna be just exactly what we've been for the past decade and

that's not particularly healthy for our economy Oh

North Korea where do you see it going now because China obviously is where

now is asserting its interest and and and just wiping the table with the

president's delegates to represent those interests at least on trade in Beijing

and here yes for the last two months China has been really sanctions busting

when Kim jong-un went to Beijing in March you know they showed all the

pictures of the sanctions violation I think there will be a summit with Kim

jong-un he needs sanctions relief might not be June 12 in Singapore but it will

occur there's gonna be problems down the road

Trump's gotta actually up the sanctions not only on North Korea but also on

China

you

For more infomation >> Lou Dobbs:What created the US trade deficit with China? - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:57.

JUSTICE SERVED!

US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation!

For eight years, President Barack Hussein Obama felt like he were some kind of God that

ruled our great nation.

He thought wrong.

After eight years of hell, the supreme court has finally decided to prove to everyone once,

and for all that Obama completely violated the United States Constitution.

The Supreme court, earlier this month ruled that Obama Appointee, Lafe Solomon illegally

served as the acting general counsel for the National Labor Relations Board.

Solomon spent three years in this position.

While Barack Obama ignored the U.S Senates reasons on why they would not take up Solomon's

nomination he made damn sure that Solomon kept his job.

The Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 clearly states Solomon was supposed to step down from

any company he had stock in, or sat on a board.

When Solomon refused to do this the U.S Senate refused to take up his nomination.

During Solomon's illegal appointment he intervened in a case on behalf of a company

he has stock in.

This is the kind of lawlessness we had in the previous administration.

The media gave Obama, as well as the rest of the administration a pass.

Let a Republican U.S Senator make a wrong foot gesture in the men's restroom, and

it's blasted all over the world, and pushed hard until the Senator either resigns, or

is forced out.

Eric Holder literally got away with m****r during Fast and Furious and yet the media

just let it go as if it were something that happens everyday, and no one really cared.

President Trump knows first hand what it's like to be attacked by the media.

It's a good thing our POTUS knows how to handle them, and put them in their place from

time to time.

Liberty One TV reported:

In a 6-2 opinion, written authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court ruled that

Barack Hussein Obama violated the Constitution.

Surprise, surprise, surprise!Unlike every other President in modern history, Barack

Hussein Obama is not stepping aside for the good of the country to let the new President

govern.

Out of office for under a year, Barack Hussein Obama already has a "community organizing"

organization with 250 offices around the country, and 30,000 employees in place.

Their sole purpose is to interfere, and fight the Trump administration every step of the

way.

It is despicable.

It is Un-American!

The name of his new leftist nonprofit group is called OFA.

Get use to that folks, it will soon be as famous as George Soros, and Black Lives Matter.

OFA stands for Organizing for Action.

How appropriate.

The community organizer is going back to organizing albeit on a much larger scale, not to mention

more violent and destructive.

It's obvious that Soros money is at the forefront of it all.

It's all so obvious, but the Left continues to deny, deny, deny!

Barack and Michelle Obama deliberately moved into an 8,000 square foot mansion just two

miles from President Donald Trump's current home, the White House.

Obama will also be leasing office space in the headquarters building of the National

Wildlife Building.

It's all too suspicious.

The Daily Mail has also reported that Obama's closest adviser, Valerie Jarrett, has also

moved into the mansion.

The reasoning?

She is working beside Michelle Obama and Barack Obama.

She is extremely close with the Obamas.

She also lived in the White House with them while Obama was in office.

Jarrett was involved in many major domestic and foreign policy decisions while Obama was

in office as well.Many Americans are concerned that Barack Obama is working on constructing

a shadow government to disrupt the presidency of Donald Trump.

It seems that we are getting awfully close to sedition.

Obama is walking a fine line, and many are claiming that he is working against the best

interests of the United Sates government.

The New York Post reported:

"HE'S WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES TO SET UP WHAT WILL EFFECTIVELY BE A SHADOW GOVERNMENT,

TO NOT ONLY PROTECT HIS THREATENED LEGACY, BUT TO SABOTAGE THE INCOMING ADMINISTRATION,

AND ITS POPULAR "AMERICA FIRST" AGENDA."

Barack Obama didn't care at all about the Constitution.

Take the Chrysler Bailout for example.

Yes, the Bush Admin started it, but Barack Obama's Admin used the TARP funds to bully

Chrysler's secured creditors who were entitles to "Absolute priority" into accepting

30 cents on every dollar while the smaller creditors received much more.

Obamacare, Political Profiling by the IRS, Recess Appointments, DACA & DAPA, Assault

On Free Speech and Due Process On College Campuses, The Clean Power Act, The WOTUS Rule,

Net Neutrality, EPA's Cap & Trade just to name a few.

The audacity that Barack Obama had to shreds the Constitution is despicable.

That's Only The Beginning

It was obviously difficult to narrow that enumeration to just 10—and I cheated by

putting all the Obamacare shenanigans under one item.

Some may complain that I should've prioritized other kinds of executive actions, whether

regarding g**s or transgender bathroom access or electricity regulation.

Others may prefer to invoke President Obama's decision not to subject the Iran nuclear treaty

to a Senate vote—aided by Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker's naïve complicity—or

engaging in the Bowe Bergdahl prisoner swap without notifying Congress.

Sadly, the possibilities for this parlor game are nearly endless.

Then, of course, there's the administration's abysmal performance before the Supreme Court,

where its win percentage hovers around 45 percent (as against a historical norm of 60-70

percent).

The Justice Department has even suffered nearly 50 unanimous losses, half again as many as

under George W. Bush or Bill Clinton.

These cases have come in such disparate areas as criminal procedure, religious liberty,

property rights, immigration, securities regulation, tax law, and the separation of powers.

They have nothing in common other than incredible assertions of federal power.

The government's arguments across this wide variety of cases would essentially allow the

executive branch to do whatever it wants without constitutional restraint.

Are these really the kind of powers President Obama and his progressive enablers would want

their worst enemies to have?

As my colleague Gene Healy writes in the latest issue of Reason, "the very idea of 'President

Trump' seemed like a thought experiment a libertarian might have invented to get a

liberal friend to focus on the dangers of concentrated power.

Now it's an experiment we're going to run in real life, starting January 20, 2017."

If you live by executive action, you d*e by executive action—whether that means reversing

President Obama's policies or pocketing his constitutional excesses for future use.

–Federalist

For more infomation >> JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:57.

-------------------------------------------

US jobs optimism hits new high - Duration: 3:33.

For more infomation >> US jobs optimism hits new high - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES, RUSSIA, CHINA vs REST OF THE WORLD | Military Power Comparison (2018) - Duration: 3:03.

For more infomation >> UNITED STATES, RUSSIA, CHINA vs REST OF THE WORLD | Military Power Comparison (2018) - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea tensions ESCALATE ahead of US summit as Kim warned 'do NOT try to play Trump' - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> North Korea tensions ESCALATE ahead of US summit as Kim warned 'do NOT try to play Trump' - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

And our Blue House correspondent Hwang Hojun, who's also in Washington for the summit between

Presidents Moon and Trump... is going to guide us step-by-step through the flurry of diplomacy

that's taken place over the past few months to get us to this point.

The diplomatic surge in Northeast Asia started in March.

"South and North Korea have agreed to hold the third leaders' summit at the Peace House

in Panmunjom in late April.

For this, we agreed to hold working-level talks."

And just three days later, U.S. President Donald Trump agreed to meet with North Korean

leader Kim Jong-un, after being briefed by the South Korean special envoys who personally

delivered Kim's willingness to denuclearize.

"President Trump appreciated the briefing and said he would meet Kim Jong-un by May

to achieve permanent denuclearization."

But, while Pyongyang's icy relationship with South Korea and the U.S. seemed to be defrosting,

the regime made sure to play its cards close to its chest.

In late March, about a month prior to the inter-Korean summit, Kim Jong-un made a surprise

visit to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

It was Kim's first trip outside North Korea as well as his first one-on-one with a foreign

leader since he took power in 2011.

Kim and Xi discussed Pyongyang's commitment to dialogue with South Korea and the U.S.

for denuclearization while underscoring the necessity and historical significance of bilateral

ties between North Korea and China and pledging closer communication and cooperation.

On April 27th, the historic inter-Korean summit took place at the border village of Panmunjom.

Thoughts of reconciliation and reunification were in the air as President Moon and Kim

pledged to cooperate to de-escalate military tension by halting all aggression and to realize

a "complete" denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

"Chairman Kim and I have today reaffirmed our common goal of realizing a nuclear-free

Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization."

Less than two weeks later,... Kim made a surprise visit to Dalian, a city in China's northeast,...

for his second summit with Xi Jinping,.... once again pledging to strengthen the strategic

communication between the two countries.

China's determination to make sure it would still be able to exert influence on North

Korea-related affairs was expressed a couple days after, during a trilateral summit in

Tokyo between leaders of South Korea, Japan and China.

And a couple of days after that, President Trump announced the Pyongyang-Washington summit

would be held in Singapore on June 12th.

Tuesday's one-on-one between the two leaders comes amid North Korea's threats to cancel

its upcoming summit with President Trump if the U.S. continues its quote "one-sided"

affair pressuring Pyongyang to give up its nuclear program,... while also citing the

recent joint exercises between Seoul and Washington The spotlight will be on how President Moon,...

bearing the label, "the negotiator",... will navigate through the regional diplomatic tug-a-war

to guarantee a successful North Korea-U.S. summit as well as to establish lasting peace

on the Korean Peninsula.

Hwang Hojun, Arirang News, Washington.

For more infomation >> S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2017 - Duration: 2:44.

[MUSIC] SPEAKER.

I am doing better now than I was five years ago financially.

SPEAKER. My finances are-- I think a little bit less.

SPEAKER. I had to take a time off

from work because of my health.

And this year I'm back to work.

So, I'm doing a lot better.

SPEAKER. My last child left home, so that was an expense off

of me, so things are a lot better now.

SPEAKER. Paying overall less per month, I think,

with housing expenses.

SPEAKER. Even though I'm working like,

five part-time jobs, I'm doing all right.

NARRATOR. To understand how people

across the country are managing financially,

the Federal Reserve has reached out to thousands of people

like these for each of the past five years in the Survey

of Household Economics & Decisionmaking.

The responses to the survey show how the typical family is faring

financially, and how that has changed in recent years.

Results from the latest survey in 2017 show

that most Americans are doing at least okay financially,

although some people are still struggling.

Consistent with other signs of the improving economy,

each year since 2013, fewer people have said

that they are finding it difficult to get by financially.

Work-life in America is constantly changing.

How many hours people work, and whether their schedule varies

from week to week, may affect their economic well-being.

SPEAKER. My work schedule doesn't vary too much.

SPEAKER. Only if I'm working on a special project does it vary.

SPEAKER. My work-life has definitely changed,

it's gotten a lot busier.

SPEAKER. My work schedule now is I work 30 hours a week.

SPEAKER. I really would not like to work more hours, no.

SPEAKER. My work schedule, it varies-- it changes drastically.

So, it may not be the same every week.

NARRATOR. While most people work regular hours,

almost one in six workers say

that their employer varies the hours they work.

And one in 10 workers receive their work schedule less

than a week in advance.

These irregular schedules are particularly common among

part-time workers who would like to work more hours.

They are also common among those working in retail,

food services, or entertainment industries

and those with less education.

Part-time workers are also less likely to have received a raise

in the past year, and are less satisfied

with both their benefits and their salary.

The results of this survey help establish a more informed

picture of the financial status of individuals, including those

of different races, genders, and locations.

To learn more about how people are saving for emergencies,

planning for retirement, and making education

and student loan decisions,

please visit federalreserve.gov/ consumerscommunities/ shed.

[MUSIC]

For more infomation >> Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2017 - Duration: 2:44.

-------------------------------------------

S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

And our Blue House correspondent Hwang Hojun, who's also in Washington for the summit between

Presidents Moon and Trump... is going to guide us step-by-step through the flurry of diplomacy

that's taken place over the past few months to get us to this point.

The diplomatic surge in Northeast Asia started in March.

"South and North Korea have agreed to hold the third leaders' summit at the Peace House

in Panmunjom in late April.

For this, we agreed to hold working-level talks."

And just three days later, U.S. President Donald Trump agreed to meet with North Korean

leader Kim Jong-un, after being briefed by the South Korean special envoys who personally

delivered Kim's willingness to denuclearize.

"President Trump appreciated the briefing and said he would meet Kim Jong-un by May

to achieve permanent denuclearization."

But, while Pyongyang's icy relationship with South Korea and the U.S. seemed to be defrosting,

the regime made sure to play its cards close to its chest.

In late March, about a month prior to the inter-Korean summit, Kim Jong-un made a surprise

visit to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

It was Kim's first trip outside North Korea as well as his first one-on-one with a foreign

leader since he took power in 2011.

Kim and Xi discussed Pyongyang's commitment to dialogue with South Korea and the U.S.

for denuclearization while underscoring the necessity and historical significance of bilateral

ties between North Korea and China and pledging closer communication and cooperation.

On April 27th, the historic inter-Korean summit took place at the border village of Panmunjom.

Thoughts of reconciliation and reunification were in the air as President Moon and Kim

pledged to cooperate to de-escalate military tension by halting all aggression and to realize

a "complete" denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

"Chairman Kim and I have today reaffirmed our common goal of realizing a nuclear-free

Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization."

Less than two weeks later,... Kim made a surprise visit to Dalian, a city in China's northeast,...

for his second summit with Xi Jinping,.... once again pledging to strengthen the strategic

communication between the two countries.

China's determination to make sure it would still be able to exert influence on North

Korea-related affairs was expressed a couple days after, during a trilateral summit in

Tokyo between leaders of South Korea, Japan and China.

And a couple of days after that, President Trump announced the Pyongyang-Washington summit

would be held in Singapore on June 12th.

Tuesday's one-on-one between the two leaders comes amid North Korea's threats to cancel

its upcoming summit with President Trump if the U.S. continues its quote "one-sided"

affair pressuring Pyongyang to give up its nuclear program,... while also citing the

recent joint exercises between Seoul and Washington The spotlight will be on how President Moon,...

bearing the label, "the negotiator",... will navigate through the regional diplomatic tug-a-war

to guarantee a successful North Korea-U.S. summit as well as to establish lasting peace

on the Korean Peninsula.

Hwang Hojun, Arirang News, Washington.

For more infomation >> S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Does Iron Fist Imperialism Benefit US Workers? - Duration: 13:47.

SHARMINI PERIES: It's The Real News Network.

I'm Sharmini Peries, coming to you from Baltimore.

Imperialism, a highly contested term in political science- one form of imperialism is the act

of using your military for expanding and extending borders and conquering land.

Now, there is a less invasive form, at least less invasive militarily, but imperialism

also could include gaining influence through political and economic means- why, a free

market economy, which also subjugates foreign countries, to adhere to the national interests

of the imperial state via the market place.

Now, we saw both of these forms of imperialism coming together when we, meaning the US, invaded

Iraq.

Now, the U.S. Invasion of Iraq was done under a false claim that Saddam Hussein and Iraq

had weapons of mass destruction.

Now, they did this to gain access to exploiting the natural resources that Iraq had, which

is oil, and getting rid of Saddam Hussein, really helped order to gain control of the

oil wells, he oil contracts, the resources, and the oil itself coming out of Iraq.

Now, if the British empire grew very powerful by dominating foreign markets, natural resources,

and of course cheap labor in the colonies, so could the U.S.

Now, Karl Marx posed the question if it is worth it to impoverish millions of workers

in the East Indies in order to procure for just one point five million workers in England

in the same industry.

Now, that question has become even more relevant today, when it comes to the U.S., and its

mission, or imperialistic ambitions, abroad.

Now, President Trump, during his inauguration, drew a direct connection between U.S. imperialism

and the U.S. working class, and how his plans, his vision, for the United States could benefit

its workers.

Let's listen.

DONALD TRUMP: From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.

America first.

Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs, will be made to benefit

American workers and American families.

SHARMINI PERIES: In a new book, titled Changing Face of Imperialism, edited by Sunanda Sen

and Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Professor Gerald Epstein has a chapter in that book he wrote

a while ago, "Do U.S. Workers Gain from U.S. Imperialism?"

In this chapter, Gerald Epstein calculated that between 1985 and 2000, the bottom eighty

percent of Americans lost between four hundred billion and 2.8 eight trillion dollars as

a direct result of US imperialism.

Well, on to talk about this with me is Gerald Epstein.

He is co-director of the Political Economy Research Institute at UMass Amherst, and he's

professor of economics there as well.

Good to have you back with us, Gerry.

GERALD EPSTEIN: Thank you for having me.

SHARMINI PERIES: Gerry, let's start with the why you embarked on this endeavor in the first

place, to explore if the U.S. worker actually gained some benefits from U.S. imperialism.

GERALD EPSTEIN: Right, as you said- you know, I wrote this chapter actually quite a while

ago, just as the United States was about to invade Iraq in 2003.

And the question I was asking myself is- well, this seemed to be a wildly popular decision

on the part of the Bush administrations, George W. Bush, including among workers.

And my- the question I was asking myself is, why?

This seemed like such a despicable, immoral, and crazy act.

Why was it so wildly popular among people including U.S. working class?

GERALD EPSTEIN: So, I decided to actually go out and look, try to put together a conceptual

framework, look at the numbers, and see whether, in the recent past at that time, U.S. workers

had benefited from U.S. imperialism.

And, as you suggested in your introduction, there are different ways think about imperialism.

One is, imperialism that involves the use of military force to achieve hegemony over

other countries and extract benefits from them.

And since I was interested in the invasion of Iraq, I decided to try to estimate mostly

that kind of imperialism.

And there's a more informal type of imperialism, just based on various kinds of subtle powers

the U.S. might have.

It influenced the International Monetary Fund, other countries' trade policies, their foreign

aid policies, et cetera.

These I put on one side.

So, I was really looking at what I call "the iron fist" of Imperialism, the involvement

of a military force.

And I found, as you suggested, that in fact U.S. workers, in the fifteen years before

the invasion, lost from U.S. imperialism.

And so, I tried to calculate both the benefits and the costs.

So, what could the possible benefits to U.S. workers be?

Well, Michael Klare and others argue that a lot of U.S. Foreign policy has been directed

towards controlling oil in the Middle East.

And clearly, the invasion of Iraq was connected with that whole endeavor- to control the supply

of oil.

So, one issue is, well, who benefits from oil prices being lower and oil prices being

more stable?

A second role of imperialism is, for the United States, to be able to borrow money from the

rest of the world at an incredibly low interest rate because of the role of the dollar, which

is maintained partly by military force that the United States exerts.

So, what is the benefit of workers, of getting lower-interest loans from the rest of the

world and getting things more cheaply.

So, those are benefits.

What are the costs to U.S. workers?

Well of course, there's the cost of blood, human life.

A lot of the military is supplied by U.S. workers.

But I didn't include that, that's clearly negative.

But the other cost is the budgetary expenditure, military expenditures, which in the United

States are massive.

And who pays for those, who pays the tax burden to pay for those military expenditures?

So, when I added it all up, what I came out with was the figures you mentioned- was that,

in fact, the U.S. worker, as a group, you can measure them as a lower sixty percent

of the income distribution, the lower eighty percent of the income distribution lost.

tremendously, as much as two trillion dollars or so, economically from imperialism.

I also conjectured that, is this always true?

In the 1960s, 1950s, 1970s- I didn't study this period, but I looked at it- and it seemed

like the argument is stronger that during that period, U.S. workers did benefit from

some of the imperialistic adventures that the U.S. government engaged in.

Part of the reason is because U.S. workers didn't have to pay as much of the burden.

The tax system was much more progressive in those times.

Richer people paid a higher percentage of taxes and the cost of military adventures

were less.

By the time of the 1980s, U.S. workers clearly were not benefiting economically from this.

So, if U.S. workers are supporting these kinds of military adventures, it's not really for

economic reasons, according to my analysis.

Something else is going on, which kind of raises the question, what could be going on

in the future if President Trump and his administration decides to get into another war in the Middle

East, say with Iran, or other military adventures?

Would they be popular among U.S. workers?

And it's unlikely it would be so for economic reasons.

There would have to be other reasons.

SHARMINI PERIES: So, Gerry, the tendency of the working class to actually be right wing

and support wars, which is a well-known phenomenon- you know, most of the right-wing sections

of the United States tend to be supporters of military action by the United States.

Now, even when it is obvious that empires and missions of the empire serve mainly the

upper classes, it is often the lower classes that actually have to pay the price.

It is the lower classes that are mainly in the military.

And so, I think Mark's referred to this as "false consciousness" on the part of the working

class.

Do you think that by measuring and publishing the cost of the empire, the way you have,

and its impact it's having on the working class, is it possible to conceive that people

will abandon the kind of thinking that they are having, about war-mongering in particular?

GERALD EPSTEIN: Well, I think the roots of this kind of support for military adventures,

just as the roots xenophobia and the roots of racism and anti-immigrant feelings and

so forth, are much deeper than pure economics.

I guess my view is that it could help.

I mean, at the margins, publishing these kinds of- this kind of information, pointing out

the economic costs to people who might otherwise support these kinds of policies- especially

since Trump, in this case, has really put it in economic terms you know putting America

first helping workers So, to confront that kind of argument directly may have a small

impact, and I think it's worth doing.

SHARMINI PERIES: And to dispel the myths associated with this kind of empire, mission of the empire

impacting the workers, what are some of the big data items that we could draw on to shift

public opinion?

GERALD EPSTEIN: Well, first of all, the cost of the military and who's paying the taxes

to support the military, or whose government benefits are being cut as a result of this

kind of expenditure.

That's number one.

Number two, of course, is who's paying the price in terms of having to be, as you said,

in the military losing their lives.

The impact on veterans is such a heavy price, and the government is not taking care of the

veterans.

These are all things which are, in some sense, obvious.

But it's worth harping on, being clear on, in terms of these kinds of costs.

Ultimately, though, there's a huge moral question, you know.

Is it morally correct to engage in this kind of destructive activity, killing thousands

of people in other countries, under these kinds of conditions?

And of course, the answer is no.

So, I don't mean that these economic arguments should displace the much more important strategic

and moral issues.

But it's an additional argument to emphasize.

SHARMINI PERIES: All right.

I know various economists like yourself and Joseph Stiglitz, who wrote the book on the

three trillion-dollar cost of the war in Iraq, for example, are trying to draw attention

to it.

I hope that it starts to catch on in a more popular way, because I think that's when people

really realize, you know, we are paying for this and we are losing our lives, and we need

to do something about it.

So, I thank you so much for joining us today, Gerald, and I do hope you come back soon.

GERALD EPSTEIN: Okay, thanks Sharmini.

SHARMINI PERIES: And thank you for joining us here on The Real News Network.

For more infomation >> Does Iron Fist Imperialism Benefit US Workers? - Duration: 13:47.

-------------------------------------------

After Obama Left US Town With Poisonous Water For 3 Years, Look What Trump Did In A Few Months - Duration: 5:34.

For more infomation >> After Obama Left US Town With Poisonous Water For 3 Years, Look What Trump Did In A Few Months - Duration: 5:34.

-------------------------------------------

JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:08.

JUSTICE SERVED!

US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation!

For eight years, President Barack Hussein Obama felt like he were some kind of God that

ruled our great nation.

He thought wrong.

After eight years of hell, the supreme court has finally decided to prove to everyone once,

and for all that Obama completely violated the United States Constitution.

The Supreme court, earlier this month ruled that Obama Appointee, Lafe Solomon illegally

served as the acting general counsel for the National Labor Relations Board.

Solomon spent three years in this position.

While Barack Obama ignored the U.S Senates reasons on why they would not take up Solomon's

nomination he made damn sure that Solomon kept his job.

The Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 clearly states Solomon was supposed to step down from

any company he had stock in, or sat on a board.

When Solomon refused to do this the U.S Senate refused to take up his nomination.

During Solomon's illegal appointment he intervened in a case on behalf of a company

he has stock in.

This is the kind of lawlessness we had in the previous administration.

The media gave Obama, as well as the rest of the administration a pass.

Let a Republican U.S Senator make a wrong foot gesture in the men's restroom, and

it's blasted all over the world, and pushed hard until the Senator either resigns, or

is forced out.

Eric Holder literally got away with m****r during Fast and Furious and yet the media

just let it go as if it were something that happens everyday, and no one really cared.

President Trump knows first hand what it's like to be attacked by the media.

It's a good thing our POTUS knows how to handle them, and put them in their place from

time to time.

Liberty One TV reported:

In a 6-2 opinion, written authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court ruled that

Barack Hussein Obama violated the Constitution.

Surprise, surprise, surprise!

Unlike every other President in modern history, Barack Hussein Obama is not stepping aside

for the good of the country to let the new President govern.

Out of office for under a year, Barack Hussein Obama already has a "community organizing"

organization with 250 offices around the country, and 30,000 employees in place.

Their sole purpose is to interfere, and fight the Trump administration every step of the

way.

It is despicable.

It is Un-American!

The name of his new leftist nonprofit group is called OFA.

Get use to that folks, it will soon be as famous as George Soros, and Black Lives Matter.

OFA stands for Organizing for Action.

How appropriate.

The community organizer is going back to organizing albeit on a much larger scale, not to mention

more violent and destructive.

It's obvious that Soros money is at the forefront of it all.

It's all so obvious, but the Left continues to deny, deny, deny!

Barack and Michelle Obama deliberately moved into an 8,000 square foot mansion just two

miles from President Donald Trump's current home, the White House.

Obama will also be leasing office space in the headquarters building of the National

Wildlife Building.

It's all too suspicious.

The Daily Mail has also reported that Obama's closest adviser, Valerie Jarrett, has also

moved into the mansion.

The reasoning?

She is working beside Michelle Obama and Barack Obama.

She is extremely close with the Obamas.

She also lived in the White House with them while Obama was in office.

Jarrett was involved in many major domestic and foreign policy decisions while Obama was

in office as well.

Many Americans are concerned that Barack Obama is working on constructing a shadow government

to disrupt the presidency of Donald Trump.

It seems that we are getting awfully close to sedition.

Obama is walking a fine line, and many are claiming that he is working against the best

interests of the United Sates government.

The New York Post reported:

"HE'S WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES TO SET UP WHAT WILL EFFECTIVELY BE A SHADOW GOVERNMENT,

TO NOT ONLY PROTECT HIS THREATENED LEGACY, BUT TO SABOTAGE THE INCOMING ADMINISTRATION,

AND ITS POPULAR "AMERICA FIRST" AGENDA."

Barack Obama didn't care at all about the Constitution.

Take the Chrysler Bailout for example.

Yes, the Bush Admin started it, but Barack Obama's Admin used the TARP funds to bully

Chrysler's secured creditors who were entitles to "Absolute priority" into accepting

30 cents on every dollar while the smaller creditors received much more.

Obamacare, Political Profiling by the IRS, Recess Appointments, DACA & DAPA, Assault

On Free Speech and Due Process On College Campuses, The Clean Power Act, The WOTUS Rule,

Net Neutrality, EPA's Cap & Trade just to name a few.

The audacity that Barack Obama had to shreds the Constitution is despicable.

That's Only The Beginning

It was obviously difficult to narrow that enumeration to just 10—and I cheated by

putting all the Obamacare shenanigans under one item.

Some may complain that I should've prioritized other kinds of executive actions, whether

regarding g**s or transgender bathroom access or electricity regulation.

Others may prefer to invoke President Obama's decision not to subject the Iran nuclear treaty

to a Senate vote—aided by Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker's naïve complicity—or

engaging in the Bowe Bergdahl prisoner swap without notifying Congress.

Sadly, the possibilities for this parlor game are nearly endless.

Then, of course, there's the administration's abysmal performance before the Supreme Court,

where its win percentage hovers around 45 percent (as against a historical norm of 60-70

percent).

The Justice Department has even suffered nearly 50 unanimous losses, half again as many as

under George W. Bush or Bill Clinton.

These cases have come in such disparate areas as criminal procedure, religious liberty,

property rights, immigration, securities regulation, tax law, and the separation of powers.

They have nothing in common other than incredible assertions of federal power.

The government's arguments across this wide variety of cases would essentially allow the

executive branch to do whatever it wants without constitutional restraint.

Are these really the kind of powers President Obama and his progressive enablers would want

their worst enemies to have?

As my colleague Gene Healy writes in the latest issue of Reason, "the very idea of 'President

Trump' seemed like a thought experiment a libertarian might have invented to get a

liberal friend to focus on the dangers of concentrated power.

Now it's an experiment we're going to run in real life, starting January 20, 2017."

If you live by executive action, you d*e by executive action—whether that means reversing

President Obama's policies or pocketing his constitutional excesses for future use.

–Federalist

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:08.

-------------------------------------------

Mnuchin declares US-China trade war 'on hold' - Duration: 2:37.

For more infomation >> Mnuchin declares US-China trade war 'on hold' - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

After Obama Left US Town With Poisonous Water For 3 Years, Look What Trump Did In A Few Months - Duration: 5:27.

After Obama Left US Town With Poisonous Water For 3 Years, Look What Trump Did In A Few

Months When Barack Obama was sworn into office, he

promised America that he would bring her back from the depths of hell, and put us back on

the map.

He persuaded A LOT of people that he was the guy for the job.

The commander and chief of the greatest country on earth is supposed to make sure that ALL

Americans are taken care of, and protected before, and after any major event.

That's not what Obama did for the residents of Flint, Michigan.

Luckily, America elected a man that would do just that.

No, it wasn't Barack Obama.

President Trump is one of the only Presidents to keep the promises he made on the campaign

trail.

Flint, Michigan is a suburb North West of Detriot.

The population of Flint is around 100,000 people.

The city of Flint has had its ups and downs like almost every city, but the biggest effect

on Flint has been the Auto Industry.

Buick provided thousands of jobs for people as well as GM in Detriot.

With the Buick lot going under, and GM helping bring down the greater Detriot economy, the

people of Flint felt it couldn't get any worse.

But it Did.

The residents of Flint woke up to the startling news that the water they were drinking was

contaminated with high levels of lead.

This was caused in 2014 when the drinking water source for the city was changed to the

Flint River.

The reason?

Poor city management of money.

Like most every liberal leaning towns, the Democratic leadership failed to pay the bills

and was forced to switch.

Scientific studies proved that the water was in fact contaminated with lead and was present

in the current water supply.

A federal state of emergency was declared in January of 2016.

Everyone in the city of Flint was told to use bottles of water that had been brought

in instead of drinking anything from the faucets.

Barack Obama promised he would tackle Flint, and hold the people who caused this disaster

accountable.

Lik always, Obama was just pandering for political points.

He was going to leave the issue to the next President who he thought was going to be Hillary

Clinton.

Hillary Clinton traveled to Flint during her campaign and talked about how much she cared

for the people of Flint, and how she was going to make sure she took care of the people there

if she were to become President.

It's almost as if she told them…

vote for me and you will get free stuff, or vote for him, and he will let you all d*e.Under

authority granted the agency by the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation

Act of 2016, the EPA issued a $100 million grant to the beleaguered city of Flint, Michigan,

to help in the effort at replacing the city's badly corroded and lead-tainted system of

water pipes.

Some progressive critics of President Donald Trump have pointed to his proposed budget

cuts at the Environmental Protection Agency as proof that he is a terrible president who

doesn't care about ensuring that Americans have clean air and water.

However, the recent report from The Daily Caller about Trump's EPA grant just did

throw that narrative into a tailspin.

"The people of Flint and all Americans deserve a more responsive federal government," said

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt in an agency news release.

"EPA will especially focus on helping Michigan improve Flint's water infrastructure as

part of our larger goal of improving America's water infrastructure."We are excited and

very grateful to receive these much-needed funds," Flint Mayor Karen Weaver said.

"The City of Flint being awarded a grant of this magnitude in such a critical time

of need will be a huge benefit."

"As we prepare to start the next phase of the FAST Start pipe replacement program, these

funds will give us what we need to reach our goal of replacing 6,000 pipes this year and

make other needed infrastructure improvements," she added.

"We look forward to the continued support of the EPA and the federal government."

As part of the deal, the state of Michigan matched 20 percent of the grant, pitching

in $20 million.

Hillary Clinton wouldn't have done anything to help the people of Flint.

How do we know this?

There isn't ONE TIME that Hillary Clinton has traveled back to Flint to check on the

people she promised so much to.

Never once has any of HER people gone back to help try and make a difference with the

Clinton Foundation.

Afterall, they're there to help people in need right?

Wrong.

The Clinton Foundation was purposely created to keep the Clinton's wealthy.

The people of Flint are happy to know that someone is finally taking action in their

city.

President Trump is fulfilling a campaign promise once again and making sure the people of Flint

have safe water to drink and use in their everyday lives.

The Democrats have done nothing for Michigan, and will never do anything.

The state was once a hotbed for new ideas and a booming economy.

After 60 years of Democrat rule, the city of Detroit is crumbling, and the state is

in disrepair.

This might be why President Trump won the state of Michigan in 2016.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét