Thứ Ba, 22 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 22 2018

hello America I'm Marc Levin this is life liberty and Levin we have a great

guest Gordon Chang how are you my friend fine and thank you so much Marc it's

great to see you Gordon Chang expert on China North Korea

really Asia generally you graduated from Cornell University in American history

then you graduated from Cornell Law School in 1976 I couldn't escape you

couldn't escape I'm sure you were surrounded by all kinds of cool liberals

but anyway yeah you're fairly ubiquitous on radio and TV too as an expert on

North Korea and China and frankly America in terms of our dealings with

these countries and obviously this has been teed up because the president at

least is supposedly in June on June 12th to be meeting with the the dictator of

North Korea Kim jong-un and yet this week there's been all kinds of ups and

downs and so forth and I want to get into that but I want the folks to

understand also something here I have here a document a document that goes

back to 1985 in all the discussions negotiations side deals actual deals big

time deals between the United States and North Korea the United States North

Korea and China the United States and five other countries in North Korea the

United States South Korea Japan and and North Korea or aimed at preventing North

Korea from getting news we've given them enormous amounts of money enormous

amounts of resources and they have nukes what happened I think that you know the

United States had other priorities and so what we did was we put North Korea

almost all the time at the bottom of the list and so of course the North Koreans

were able to just basically you know lie cheat and steal and we weren't paying

that much attention there were only certain moments that marked that we

really were concerned and that was for instance 1994 when we almost went to war

but you know during the administration of george w bush

you know they spent a lot of time on North Korea but for them the most

important thing was integrating China into the international system and so the

Bush administration put for instance China at the center of the six-party

talks and because of that you know we sort of got an arrogant Beijing because

we really sort of fed their notions of self-importance and we got a nuked up

North Korea so you know you get to the Obama era and basically it's in the too

hard basket they spend much more attention on Iran almost nothing on

North Korea and then the most amazing thing and this is credit to President

Obama he's basically an admission of mistake because during the transition

period they went to the Trump team and said look you're number one national

security priority is going to be North Korea and the Trump administration

actually took that seriously because when you look at at Trump's foreign

policy it's basically North Korea driven yeah of course they're interested in the

Middle East because they have to but for the rest of it

you know they subordinated their China policy to North Korea and that's the

reason why you get Kim jong-un at least saying he's gonna show up in Singapore

June 12th maybe it's July 12th maybe it's August

12th but I think it will happen what has Donald Trump done that's so

different from most of the recent presidents with respect to North Korea

really there are two things I think first of all you have the sanctions not

only US sanctions but also a concerted effort at the UN for Security Council

sanctions and the other thing of course is the president's comments that he was

going to strike North Korea he was not going to allow them to be able to strike

the American homeland and then of course you have John Bolton's national security

adviser Mike Pompeo you know this has actually unnerved the North Koreans and

also the South Koreans of the Chinese because there's a guy named Andre long

cough was some considered to be the world's number one expert on North Korea

he wrote a piece recently he said look the policies of these three countries

changed dramatically toward the end of last year and the only reason why that

happened was because they were afraid of war he doesn't save the next line which

is they're afraid of war because of President Trump but that's the reason

why and because of that you had a much

bigger pathway to peace and essentially we had at least for a moment peace

looked like it was gonna break out in North Asia well that's because they were

concerned about what the US was going to do that for the first time in a very

long time mark you know the United States was going to protect the American

homeland whatever it took and the president put a very significant naval

presence off the Korean Peninsula hasn't he well he did that with three carrier

groups three Carrier Strike groups I mean that's you know an AV that's been

severely depleted yeah three carrier groups in one place is really important

of course there were the escorts and of course the nuclear subs then of course

you also had the b-52s the B ones the F twenty-twos and so this has really been

a deployment of military resources at certain times that I think the North

Koreans looked at that and especially the Chinese they looked at and said you

know we really got to take the United States seriously now let's take a look

at this from a wall places the Washington Post 1994 the 2000 to 1994

North Korea agrees to halt the construction of two reactors the United

States thinks could be used as part of a nuclear weapons program instead

according to the agreement an international consortium is supposed to

replace the plutonium reactors with two light-water reactors in the u.s. agrees

to supply half a million tons of heavy fuel oil every year during the

construction period besides the u.s. South Korea Japan

European agency form an organization test with implementing the Accord but

when George W Bush becomes president in 2001 the United States walks away from

the talks with North Korea over concerns it is running a clandestine program the

North ultimately confirms the program's existence in 2002 rejecting further

negotiations kicking out the inspectors doubling down on its efforts at a time

when the United States is preparing to invade Iraq 2005 in August 2003 the

United States decides to participate in new negotiations with North Korea the

six-party talks alongside China South Korea Russia and Japan two years

later in February 20 2005 North Korea suspends its involvement in the

negotiations citing us conditions and resistance after restart in summer 2005

it again takes only 13 days for the negotiations to derail 2006 despite

suspending its involvement in the talk several times that year North Korea

agrees to end its nuclear weapons program this is 12 years ago only about

half a year later in September 2005 but once again North Korea suspends its

participation in the talks of Ryu s sanctions soon thereafter in October

2006 it launches its first nuclear test o 7:08 in 2007 six-party talks resumed

North Korea later agrees to major concessions some steps are taken to

follow through on its promises but then North Korea rejects US verification

methods and violates its own promises causing the breakdown of negotiations

again 2009 to 2010 North Korea rejects u.s. and South Korean promises during

new talks tensions with South Korea escalate after it accuses the north of

having torpedo one of its Navy ships in 2010 dozens of South Koreans died in the

attack 2012 weeks after Kim reaches a deal with the United States to suspend

its nuclear weapons program North Korea launches a long-range rocket causing the

agreement to fall apart the following year North Korea also

canceled scheduled family reunifications and have South Korean and US joint

military drills 2015 North Korea rejects any future talks on suspending its

nuclear weapons program after almost being drawn in an open military conflict

North Korean South Korea engagement talks they quickly fall apart and then

in 2016 in July North Korea signals its willingness to negotiate but

subsequently launches a number of missile tests tensions further escalate

as we know in 2017 and now he's messing around again that is kim jong on is

messing around now as we lead up to this so-called deadline of July June 12th I

think it is talking about well now I'm concerned about the military exercises

and we don't like John Bolton and this sort of thing would make of all this

well I think that there's this has a similarity to it

there is a Kim family playbook they use it all the time Kim jong-un learned it

from his father his father learned it from his grandfather right now though

the sanctions are really starting to hurt Kim jong-un

you don't have money you can't launch missiles you can't detonate nukes and

you can't engage in give politics which is basically a Kim ruler giving luxury

items Mercedes and Rolexes the senior regime elements to buy loyalty we're

starting to see evidence that North Korea is really hurting so for instance

you know that soldier who defected on November 13th across the military

demarcation line you know CNN had that story which was really gross about how

the guy had 11-inch parasites been in something well that's because they have

human excrement as fertilizer we've known that for a long time what was

really significant though was the soldier had uncooked kernels of corn and

his digestive tract which meant that he was scrounging for food the reason why

this is important mark is because those soldiers who are assigned to the joint

security area in the Demilitarized Zone that is like one of the most sensitive

posts this guy had to be well-connected probably a family in Pyongyang and so

the regime had every reason in the world to keep this guy well-fed they couldn't

do it you know we're starting to see also that rations in North Korea arms

even for elite officials are starting to be reduced there's a whole sorts of

things the Chinese are saying that office number 39 which is the Kim family

slush fund is running low of cash you know the list goes on and on and and

that's because the administration has tightened sanctions and has really done

a pretty good job of this there's more that they can do but what they've been

trying to do is get the Kim's to the bargaining table now they've been sort

of successful in doing that and we'll have to see that's what I think is

different and that is that this president actually has put North Korea

at the top of the list that's not to say that he's going to be successful but

that's a precondition to success and we haven't had that in a very long time

because as you read through that list I could think of all the things that

American administrations were doing that word didn't relate to North Korea North

Korea was sort of off to the side for almost all that

with maybe one exception 1994 for a month when we looked like we were going

to war but apart from that you know North Korea is all this is you know

there's this destitute little country can't do things can we collapse North

Korea economically if we tighten it more but the Chinese and Russians eventually

come to their rescue with economic aid the Chinese right now are coming to

North Korea's rescue if you look at Chinese sanctions enforcement over the

last two years it's improved you look over the last two months

it's markedly deteriorated and just to give you one example kim jeong-hoon

went to beijing at the end of march china allows north korean media to

photograph all the gifts at sea Jinping the Chinese ruler gave to Kim three

hundred and ninety four thousand dollars worth of porcelain jewelry silk that by

the way mark is a UN Security Council violation and what C Jinping was doing

was he was saying look I'm gonna put I'm violating UN sanctions better yet I'm

actually gonna photograph it so you have evidence that I'm violating UN sanctions

so you know Trump is sort of let that go and if indeed we come to a good deal

with the North Koreans that they honor we can sort of let that go and not worry

about what the Chinese have done if things fall apart like they could very

well then we've got to go after the Chinese though the answer to your

question and sorry for taking such a long time but the answer to your

question is yes we can collapse North Korea they got an economy twenty eight

point five billion dollars in 2016 the last year for which we have numbers we

can actually basically closed off all commerce to North Korea and even more

important we can go after the Chinese when you get to that in a minute

my question on North Korea is this we removed about a hundred nuclear warheads

from South Korea the deal was under George HW Bush

now we've denuclearized the peninsula as just goodwill to show and now you don't

need nukes so now the only country they would nukes is North Korea and South

Korea is none shouldn't we make an effort if necessary to reintroduce the

nuclear warheads that were removed in the South Korea if necessary that very

well may be necessary sometime down the road I don't

think that we have to do it now we have 28,500 service personnel and peninsula

we put tactical nukes back on the peninsula we've got to take a fair

number of those men and women and actually guard weapons because in a

wartime scenario you don't want the North Koreans to be capturing them so

that would sort of degrade military readiness the most important thing mark

of course is that we disarmed North Korea we do that we're okay and if we

don't if we don't we're gonna have to do something and that something might even

be worse than putting nukes like on Japan you read my mind you're saying I

agree encouraging Japan and other countries in that area to step up the

United States has this crazy policy what it does is we've allowed our enemies to

get the most destructive weapons on earth and we tell our friends they can't

defend themselves this is absolutely nuts so if we have

that policy mark we've got to be effective in making sure the rogue

regimes North Korea Iran and a few others don't get nukes and if we can't

do that then we have to think our pro non-proliferation policies because if we

don't do that we know where we're going to end up we're going to end up with the

bad guys being armed and we being disarmed

you

For more infomation >> Life, Liberty & Levin: Gordon Chang on the history of US-North Korea relation - Duration: 14:55.

-------------------------------------------

JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:39.

For more infomation >> JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:39.

-------------------------------------------

US Surgeon General Assists During In-Flight Medical Emergency - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> US Surgeon General Assists During In-Flight Medical Emergency - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

US getting the bad end of potential trade deal with China? - Duration: 7:37.

For more infomation >> US getting the bad end of potential trade deal with China? - Duration: 7:37.

-------------------------------------------

Ex-United States Attorney Drops Bombshell - Duration: 11:08.

Ex-United States Attorney Drops Bombshell: Obama CIA Chief Pushed Operation to Frame

Donald Trump

Kirsters Baish|

Recently, we have been watching as the leftist Trump/Russia collusion narrative unfolds right

before our eyes.

This ridiculous narrative was the match that fueled the fire for special counsel Robert

Mueller's investigation.

Even after a year-long investigation into the allegations that Donald Trump had colluded

with the Russians during the 2016 presidential election, there has been "no credible evidence"

of such actions.

Any "evidence" that the special counsel has come up with, such as the falsified dossier,

has been thrown out.

During an appearance on Fox News this past Tuesday, former United States Attorney General

Joe diGenova touched on the lack of evidence.

DiGenova appeared on Laura Ingraham's "The Ingraham Angle," blaming former Obama administration

CIA Director John Brennan, and claiming that the whole thing was a set up in order to frame

Trump.

DiGenova explained, "It was abundantly clear that there was no legitimate basis even for

a counter intelligence investigation, let alone a criminal investigation.

It is quite obvious that John Brennan was at the head of the group of people who were

going to create a counter intelligence investigation against Trump by creating false information

that was going to be fed through Carter Page, and fed through George Papadopoulos so that

it would be picked up, reported back to Washington and provide the basis for a counter, a fake,

counter intelligence investigation.

And it was all Brennan's doing.

And that is why the Justice Department is viciously fighting revealing everything they

can about the source in London, who everybody knows the identity of."

Laura then asked the diGenova to expand on new reports on an unnamed source from London.

This source allegedly gave up the information that was used to launch the investigation

into Trump.

the former U.S. Attorney General explained, "The source in London was another person

who was feeding false information to George Papadopoulos and others about collusion which

did not exist."

As you saw in the video, former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell also appeared on the show.

She talked about a different aspect of the beginning of the collusion narrative and the

Clinton Foundation/DNC funded dossier.

Western Journal reported on Powell's comments:

She noted how the FBI had granted access to a handful of private contractors, likely to

include Fusion GPS, to sift through raw intelligence gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance

Act.

This was then passed on to Steele and others and recycled back to the U.S. intelligence

community with a false air of legitimacy to help form the narrative used as the basis

for the investigation into Trump.

DiGenova picked up on what Powell had mentioned and pointed out that there had been two opinions

issued by the FISA court in opposition to that illegal practice of allowing private

contractors access to the sensitive raw intelligence data.

DiGenova stated, "All of that was designed for the unmasking and the leaking of the names,

and that was all done by private contractors.

The FISA court objected to it and it never stopped."

Brennan has made it clear in the past that he is not a fan of President Trump, so it

isn't hard to see where diGenova would say that he tried to "frame" Trump.

Let's keep our fingers crossed that we will find out the truth one the Justice Department's

Inspector General has released their final report.

H/T fbnewscycle

For more infomation >> Ex-United States Attorney Drops Bombshell - Duration: 11:08.

-------------------------------------------

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivers remarks on "After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy." - Duration: 26:07.

For more infomation >> Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivers remarks on "After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy." - Duration: 26:07.

-------------------------------------------

Lou Dobbs:What created the US trade deficit with China? - Duration: 5:23.

and what about trade well Treasury secretary Stephen minuchin says what the

hell about trade steel and aluminum tariffs after his lead delegation have

been suspended as the negotiations with China have wrapped up the secretary

saying tariffs u.s. tariffs Trump tariffs can be put back on the table if

there's no progress made in reducing the 375 billion dollar trade deficit between

the two countries and joining us now Gordon Chang Daily Beast's columnist and

author of nuclear showdown North Korea takes on the world and China obviously

taking on the world your thoughts about the Venusian negotiated trade agreement

or non trade agreement with the Chinese yeah this does not have the hallmarks of

the president this looks like Steven minuchin we have a framework we don't

know the details yet but nonetheless it doesn't look good loo because basically

the Chinese have agreed to do what they should do and we are not going to put on

those section 301 tariffs meant to stop China's theft of intellectual property

and we're probably going to give relief to ZTE so let me see if I got this right

so there will be no tariffs on aluminum and steel dumping and by the Chinese

into this country or from anyone else apparently ZTE will suddenly be given a

pass for doing business for seven years with the Iranians and North Koreans

without imposition of any kind of penalty whatsoever and they can still

steal six hundred billion dollars worth of intellectual property from the United

States and preserve an almost 400 billion dollar trade deficit is that by

the is that basically where we are steven minuchin says it's good for us

Lou but yes you're right that's where the deal is right now in fact it's just

incredible to think that this the minutia nor anyone working for this

president would come up with that kind of nonsense I want to just show

everybody something if I may we were hearing a lot of talk folks about from

the minutia and others about sorghum and soybeans and our exports to the

to the Chinese let's take a look at the exports that we send to China right now

if we may let off by soybean some planes aircraft integrated circuits gas

turbines some scrap metal goes down the line now let's take a look at what we do

with the European Union aircraft Machinery pharmaceuticals

optical and medical equipment electric machinery let's look at Germany

particularly the mercantilist the leading mercantilist of the European

Union civilian aircraft in parts passenger cars new and used

pharmaceuticals medical equipment chemicals I mean we look like a

third-world nation in what we export to China and they're reducing not a single

tear not a single barrier to US exports yeah the real problem here is that

you've got industrial policy in China the made in China 2025 initiative the

13th five-year plan and we've got of course all the theft and the stealing

and the non-tariff barriers we got to eliminate those Lou because those are

the ones that are causing the trade deficit the president campaigned on

smart government trading and he said he couldn't blame the Chinese because they

were outsmarting us they just took his trade delegation and spanked them in

Beijing I mean it's that simple they might as well have been there with

peddlers carts with jars of sorghum in sacks of soybeans I mean it's pathetic

what they did yeah I mean we got taken to the cleaners and this I hope that

because this isn't final the president is going to intervene you know he did

actually speak to the head of the Chinese trade delegation a couple days

ago I think that's because he does see the problem there and I think that we're

gonna get a better trade deal but only because of the president because Steve

minuchin has an idea that you'd be nice to the Chinese they will reciprocate

we've tried that for about two decades now it doesn't work I think more than

being nice he basically just said you know I surrender I'll give you whatever

you want I mean it wasn't a negotiation I was a status check and the status said

you know we're gonna be just exactly what we've been for the past decade and

that's not particularly healthy for our economy Oh

North Korea where do you see it going now because China obviously is where

now is asserting its interest and and and just wiping the table with the

president's delegates to represent those interests at least on trade in Beijing

and here yes for the last two months China has been really sanctions busting

when Kim jong-un went to Beijing in March you know they showed all the

pictures of the sanctions violation I think there will be a summit with Kim

jong-un he needs sanctions relief might not be June 12 in Singapore but it will

occur there's gonna be problems down the road

Trump's gotta actually up the sanctions not only on North Korea but also on

China

you

For more infomation >> Lou Dobbs:What created the US trade deficit with China? - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

The U.S. & Israel: 70 Years of Friendship - Duration: 1:40.

[TEXT: For 70 years, The United States and Israel have developed a bond unlike any other.

This bond, strengthened by mutual security, promotion of democracy,

economic prosperity,

and peace.]

[TEXT: Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu] Israel has no better ally than the United States, and I want to assure you

the United States has no better ally than Israel.

[TEXT: President of the United States Donald Trump] It is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel

[TEXT: The U.S. Embassy moving to Jerusalem

signifies the strengthening of our diplomatic relationship

and the friendship between our people.]

[TEXT: Vice President Mike Pence] By finally recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital,

the United States has chosen fact over fiction.

And fact is the only true foundation for a just and lasting peace.

[TEXT: The United States is proud to announce the opening of the new American embassy in Jerusalem]

the capital city chosen by the Israeli people

and now recognized by the United States.]

[TEXT: Follow the U.S. Embassy to Israel, il.usembassy.gov, @USEmbassyJLM, facebook.com/USEmbassyJLM, @USEmbassyJLM]

[70 years of friendship, Produced by the U.S. Department of State]

For more infomation >> The U.S. & Israel: 70 Years of Friendship - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES, RUSSIA, CHINA vs REST OF THE WORLD | Military Power Comparison (2018) - Duration: 3:03.

For more infomation >> UNITED STATES, RUSSIA, CHINA vs REST OF THE WORLD | Military Power Comparison (2018) - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea tensions ESCALATE ahead of US summit as Kim warned 'do NOT try to play Trump' - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> North Korea tensions ESCALATE ahead of US summit as Kim warned 'do NOT try to play Trump' - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

And our Blue House correspondent Hwang Hojun, who's also in Washington for the summit between

Presidents Moon and Trump... is going to guide us step-by-step through the flurry of diplomacy

that's taken place over the past few months to get us to this point.

The diplomatic surge in Northeast Asia started in March.

"South and North Korea have agreed to hold the third leaders' summit at the Peace House

in Panmunjom in late April.

For this, we agreed to hold working-level talks."

And just three days later, U.S. President Donald Trump agreed to meet with North Korean

leader Kim Jong-un, after being briefed by the South Korean special envoys who personally

delivered Kim's willingness to denuclearize.

"President Trump appreciated the briefing and said he would meet Kim Jong-un by May

to achieve permanent denuclearization."

But, while Pyongyang's icy relationship with South Korea and the U.S. seemed to be defrosting,

the regime made sure to play its cards close to its chest.

In late March, about a month prior to the inter-Korean summit, Kim Jong-un made a surprise

visit to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

It was Kim's first trip outside North Korea as well as his first one-on-one with a foreign

leader since he took power in 2011.

Kim and Xi discussed Pyongyang's commitment to dialogue with South Korea and the U.S.

for denuclearization while underscoring the necessity and historical significance of bilateral

ties between North Korea and China and pledging closer communication and cooperation.

On April 27th, the historic inter-Korean summit took place at the border village of Panmunjom.

Thoughts of reconciliation and reunification were in the air as President Moon and Kim

pledged to cooperate to de-escalate military tension by halting all aggression and to realize

a "complete" denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

"Chairman Kim and I have today reaffirmed our common goal of realizing a nuclear-free

Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization."

Less than two weeks later,... Kim made a surprise visit to Dalian, a city in China's northeast,...

for his second summit with Xi Jinping,.... once again pledging to strengthen the strategic

communication between the two countries.

China's determination to make sure it would still be able to exert influence on North

Korea-related affairs was expressed a couple days after, during a trilateral summit in

Tokyo between leaders of South Korea, Japan and China.

And a couple of days after that, President Trump announced the Pyongyang-Washington summit

would be held in Singapore on June 12th.

Tuesday's one-on-one between the two leaders comes amid North Korea's threats to cancel

its upcoming summit with President Trump if the U.S. continues its quote "one-sided"

affair pressuring Pyongyang to give up its nuclear program,... while also citing the

recent joint exercises between Seoul and Washington The spotlight will be on how President Moon,...

bearing the label, "the negotiator",... will navigate through the regional diplomatic tug-a-war

to guarantee a successful North Korea-U.S. summit as well as to establish lasting peace

on the Korean Peninsula.

Hwang Hojun, Arirang News, Washington.

For more infomation >> S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:06.

For more infomation >> JUSTICE SERVED! US Supreme Court Just Ruled Against Obama – Found Him In Complete Violation! - Duration: 7:06.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. and China reach 'consensus' on reducing trade gap - Duration: 2:30.

The brewing trade war with China is "on hold."

That's coming from the U.S. treasury secretary, as the two superpowers set up a framework

to address related imbalances in the future.

Kim Hye-sung gets us up to speed with the developments.

After months of tensions, the United States and China have agreed to take measures to

"substantially reduce" America's massive trade deficit with China.

The two countries also agreed on "meaningful increases" of U.S. agriculture and energy

exports, and greater efforts to increase trade, while striving to create a level playing field

for competition.

The joint statement released Saturday comes after two days of talks in Washington, led

by U.S Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin and Beijing's special envoy and state council

vice premier Liu He.

Mnuchin said in an interview with Fox News on Sunday, that "the two sides are putting

the trade war and tariffs on hold while they try to execute the framework."

echoing remarks by Beijing's vice premier Liu He.

"This round of talks is pragmatic, fruitful and efficient.

We've reached many agreements.

These meetings will not just help bilateral economic and trade relations and build overall

ties, it's good for the people in both countries.

It's also sending a positive signal to the whole world."

President Donald Trump had threatened to impose tariffs of up to 150 billion U.S. dollars

on Chinese imports, with China vowing to retaliate with tariffs of 25 percent on over a hundred

U.S. goods, from soybeans to airplanes.

"A possible trade war had kept markets on edge in recent weeks.

The temporary trade war cease-fire soothes market concerns, removing a downside risk

to global trade and also to Korea, as a U.S.-China trade war would hurt Korea's exports, like

intermediary goods to China.

But then again, the deal still is short on specifics."

The deal lacks a dollar figure on the trade deficit.

Just before the second trade talks, both countries were sharply at odds over a claim, made by

White House Economic Advisor Larry Kudlow, who said China would slash its trade deficit

with the U.S. by 200 billion dollars by 2020.

U.S. intellectual property, Beijing's structural reform, and China's demand of U.S. investment,

all remain sticking points between the two countries.

The U.S. will send a team led by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross to China to hammer out

the details.

So, while, a trade war has been averted, there still may be more friction along the way.

Kim Hyesung, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. and China reach 'consensus' on reducing trade gap - Duration: 2:30.

-------------------------------------------

Nearly 51 Million Households In The United States 'Can't Afford - Duration: 7:05.

Nearly 51 Million Households In The United States �Can�t Afford Basics Like Rent

And Food�

By Edward Morgan

If the U.S. economy is performing well, then why can�t 51 million households in the United

States �afford basics like rent and food�.

A stunning new report that was just put out by the United Way ALICE Project shows that

the gap between the wealthy and the poor in this country is perhaps the biggest that it

has been in any of our lifetimes.

In some of the wealthiest areas of the nation, homes are now selling for up to 100 million

dollars, but meanwhile tens of millions of families are barely scraping by from month

to month.

Many believe that this growing �inequality gap� is setting the stage for major societal

problems.

In general, the U.S. economy seems to be performing better than expected so far in 2018, but the

ranks of the poor and the working poor just continue to grow.

The following comes from CNN�

Nearly 51 million households don�t earn enough to afford a monthly budget that includes

housing, food, child care, health care, transportation and a cell phone, according to a study released

Thursday by the United Way ALICE Project.

That�s 43% of households in the United States.

The figure includes the 16.1 million households living in poverty, as well as the 34.7 million

families that the United Way has dubbed ALICE � Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed.

This group makes less than what�s needed �to survive in the modern economy.�

If 43 percent of all Americans cannot even afford �the basics�, what does that say

about the true state of the U.S. economy?

Of course the biggest reason why so many American families are struggling is the lack of good

jobs.

In America today, 66 percent of all jobs pay less than 20 dollars an hour.

66 percent.

Just let that sink in for a minute.

You cannot support a middle class family on 20 dollars an hour.

As a result, many Americans are working more than one job, and in many households both

the mother and the father are working more than one job.

Housing costs account for the biggest item in most family budgets, and the fact that

housing costs have just continued to soar is putting a huge amount of financial stress

on hard working families.

Just today we learned that there is a tremendous rush to buy homes as mortgage rates rise rapidly�

Today, according to the latest Freddie Mac mortgage rates report, after plateauing in

recent weeks, mortgage rates reversed course and reached a new high last seen eight years

ago as the 30-year fixed mortgage rate edged up to 4.61% matching the highest level since

May 19, 2011.

But while the highest mortgage rates in 8 years are predictably crushing mortgage refinance

activity, they appears to be having the opposite effect on home purchases, where there is a

sheer scramble to buy, and sell, houses.

As Bloomberg notes, citing brokerage Redfin, the average home across the US that sold last

month went into contract after a median of 36 only days on the market � a record speed

in data going back to 2010.

If you will remember, we witnessed a very similar pattern just before the subprime mortgage

meltdown in 2008.

History is repeating itself, and we never seem to learn from our past mistakes.

Housing prices in some cities are absolutely obscene right now, and many working families

find themselves completely priced out of the market.

That has some people asking one very simple question�

Many San Francisco renters I met while reporting an articleon affordable housing lotteries

had responded to the region�s housing crisis by putting up with great discomfort: They

crammed in with family; they split apartments with strangers.

Some even lived out of their cars.

Why, lots of readers wanted to know, didn�t they simply move away instead?

Yes, some people are moving, and this is something that I plan to do an article about very soon.

But for most hard working families, moving across the country simply is not an option.

Moving out of state is very expensive, it can be very difficult to find a similar job

in an entirely new area, and many families are very dependent on the social networks

where they currently live�

People who struggle financially often have valuable social networks � family to help

with child care, acquaintances who know of jobs.

The prospect of dropping into, say, Oklahoma or Georgia would mean doing without the good

income and the social support.

Those intangible connections that keep people in places with bad economiesalso keep people

in booming regions where the rent is too high.

In the end, moving is just not an option for a lot of people.

We need to structure our economic system so that it works for all Americans � not just

a few.

Unfortunately, it is probably going to take another major crisis before people are ready

for such a restructuring.

And such a crisis may not be that far away.

In fact, even Pope Francis is now warning about the dangers of derivatives�

In a sweeping critique of global finance released by the Vatican on Thursday, the Holy See singled

out derivatives including credit-default swaps for particular scorn.

�A ticking time bomb,� the Vatican called them.

The unusual rebuke � derivatives rarely reach the level of religious doctrine � is

in keeping with Francis�s skeptical view of unbridled global capitalism.

�The market of CDS, in the wake of the economic crisis of 2007, was imposing enough to represent

almost the equivalent of the GDP of the entire world.

The spread of such a kind of contract without proper limits has encouraged the growth of

a finance of chance, and of gambling on the failure of others, which is unacceptable from

the ethical point of view,� the Vatican said in the document.

I have written about derivatives extensively in the past, and Pope Francis is 100 percent

correct when he says that they are a ticking time bomb which could absolutely devastate

the global financial system at any moment.

We don�t know exactly when it will happen, but we do know that such a crisis is coming

at some point.

Sadly, most of the population is completely asleep, and they will be completely blindsided

by the coming crisis when it does finally arrive.

For more infomation >> Nearly 51 Million Households In The United States 'Can't Afford - Duration: 7:05.

-------------------------------------------

US antitrust laws too antiquated to deal with Google? - Duration: 0:35.

For more infomation >> US antitrust laws too antiquated to deal with Google? - Duration: 0:35.

-------------------------------------------

S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

And our Blue House correspondent Hwang Hojun, who's also in Washington for the summit between

Presidents Moon and Trump... is going to guide us step-by-step through the flurry of diplomacy

that's taken place over the past few months to get us to this point.

The diplomatic surge in Northeast Asia started in March.

"South and North Korea have agreed to hold the third leaders' summit at the Peace House

in Panmunjom in late April.

For this, we agreed to hold working-level talks."

And just three days later, U.S. President Donald Trump agreed to meet with North Korean

leader Kim Jong-un, after being briefed by the South Korean special envoys who personally

delivered Kim's willingness to denuclearize.

"President Trump appreciated the briefing and said he would meet Kim Jong-un by May

to achieve permanent denuclearization."

But, while Pyongyang's icy relationship with South Korea and the U.S. seemed to be defrosting,

the regime made sure to play its cards close to its chest.

In late March, about a month prior to the inter-Korean summit, Kim Jong-un made a surprise

visit to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

It was Kim's first trip outside North Korea as well as his first one-on-one with a foreign

leader since he took power in 2011.

Kim and Xi discussed Pyongyang's commitment to dialogue with South Korea and the U.S.

for denuclearization while underscoring the necessity and historical significance of bilateral

ties between North Korea and China and pledging closer communication and cooperation.

On April 27th, the historic inter-Korean summit took place at the border village of Panmunjom.

Thoughts of reconciliation and reunification were in the air as President Moon and Kim

pledged to cooperate to de-escalate military tension by halting all aggression and to realize

a "complete" denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

"Chairman Kim and I have today reaffirmed our common goal of realizing a nuclear-free

Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization."

Less than two weeks later,... Kim made a surprise visit to Dalian, a city in China's northeast,...

for his second summit with Xi Jinping,.... once again pledging to strengthen the strategic

communication between the two countries.

China's determination to make sure it would still be able to exert influence on North

Korea-related affairs was expressed a couple days after, during a trilateral summit in

Tokyo between leaders of South Korea, Japan and China.

And a couple of days after that, President Trump announced the Pyongyang-Washington summit

would be held in Singapore on June 12th.

Tuesday's one-on-one between the two leaders comes amid North Korea's threats to cancel

its upcoming summit with President Trump if the U.S. continues its quote "one-sided"

affair pressuring Pyongyang to give up its nuclear program,... while also citing the

recent joint exercises between Seoul and Washington The spotlight will be on how President Moon,...

bearing the label, "the negotiator",... will navigate through the regional diplomatic tug-a-war

to guarantee a successful North Korea-U.S. summit as well as to establish lasting peace

on the Korean Peninsula.

Hwang Hojun, Arirang News, Washington.

For more infomation >> S. Korea-U.S. summit takes place amid diplomatic tug-of-war in Northeast Asia - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 Most Intense Battles in US History - Duration: 18:14.

In the short history of our country,

the United States rose to global military dominance.

Yeah, I said it.

Come at me, China.

But the road to the top was paved

with the blood of good men and women.

Looking back, there are some pivotal battles we remember

with solemn pride and a little bit of hoo-rah.

Let's check out 10 of the most intense battles

in United States History.

We'll kick this off with number 10 on our list,

the Battle of Chosin.

The Battle of Chosin Reservoir

was one of the defining battles of the Korean War

and the stuff of legend in the Marine Corps.

In the Fall of 1950,

U.N. Forces under the command of General MacArthur

had almost captured the entirety of North Korea

when they were attacked

by thousands of Chinese Communist soldiers.

The U.S. was forced to retreat,

and by mid-November,

the 1st Marine Division

and elements of the 7th Infantry Division

found themselves outnumbered,

surrounded,

and at risk of annihilation

in the high North Korean Mountains at the Chosin Reservoir.

Their only way out was a fighting retreat back to the coast.

Although, as Chesty Puller put it,

they weren't retreating,

they were "fighting in the opposite direction."

Over the course of the next 17 days,

the Marines and soldiers fought the Chinese,

and bouts of frostbite,

with fierce determination and epic endurance.

They broke through the enemy's encirclement

and even rebuilt a bridge the Chinese destroyed

using prebuilt bridge sections

dropped by the U.S. Air Force.

By the end of the battle,

the U.S. Marines suffered 836 dead

and roughly 10,000 wounded.

The Army had 2,000 dead and 1,000 wounded.

The Chinese had the most catastrophic losses.

Six out of their ten divisions were wiped out

and only one would ever see combat again.

Although exact numbers are unknown,

historians estimate that anywhere between 30,000

and 80,000 Chinese were killed.

Although technically a loss for the Marines,

the Battle of Chosin Reservoir lives on in memory

as an example of the Marine fighting spirit

and the ability to find strength

even when the odds are stacked against them.

Number nine, the Battle of Antietam.

A year and a half into the Civil War,

President Abraham Lincoln needed a Union victory.

He finalized the Emancipation Proclamation

during the summer,

but his cabinet feared it would be too difficult to enforce

after a string of northern losses,

including the Second Battle of Bull Run.

Lincoln charged Major General George B. McClellan

with the defense of Washington D.C.

against Confederate General Robert E. Lee's

first invasion of the North.

Earlier in the month,

Lee divided his men,

sending General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson

to capture Harper's Ferry.

Following Jackson's success,

Lee decided to make a stand in Maryland at Antietam Creek.

After two days of posturing,

fighting began early in the morning on September 17, 1862

and lasted well past sundown,

with staggering casualties on both sides

and no ground gained.

The next day, both armies gathered their dead and wounded,

and Lee retreated south.

It was the bloodiest one day battle in American history,

with 23,000 casualties from both sides,

and nearly 4,000 dead.

Sticking with the Civil War,

let's move on to number eight,

the Battle of Gettysburg.

The Battle of Gettysburg

was not only the largest battle of the Civil War,

it remains the largest battle ever fought in North America.

Confederate General Robert E. Lee had just won

a decisive victory against Union General

George Meade's Army of the Potomac in Virginia.

Wanting to capitalize on the recent victory,

Lee led his troops on a second invasion

into the Northern states

to defeat the Union on their own soil

and hopefully gain recognition

of the confederacy by European countries.

General Meade's Army of the Potomac pursued

Lee's Army of Northern Virginia

and the two forces met near Gettysburg on July 1, 1863.

The Confederates outnumbered the Yankees

at roughly 30,000 to 18,000.

By the end of the first day,

the Yankees were forced to retreat through town

to Cemetery Ridge and Culp's Hill.

By then, both sides had gained reinforcements.

Meade now had roughly 94,000 soldiers

in a fish hook formation,

allowing him to successfully move troops

from one front to another.

Lee, meanwhile,

had roughly 72,000 soldiers wrapped around that fish hook.

The Confederates attacked first

but at the end of the second day,

the Union defense lines held strong.

On the 3rd day,

Lee tried an aggressive attack to crush the federals.

He sent General Pickett with approximately 12,500 men

to crush the Union Army with a direct charge.

It turned out to be one of Lee's most ill-fated decisions.

50% of Pickett's men were wounded or killed,

and the rest of his troops were forced to retreat.

On July 4th,

Lee and his men waited for the Yankees to attack,

but they didn't.

That night, the Northern Army of Virginia

began its retreat back to the South.

His train of wounded men stretched 14 miles long.

Lee's greatest opportunity became his greatest failure

and his hopes of European recognition for the Confederacy,

and a quick end to the war,

were dashed.

Casualties were high on both sides.

The Union suffered around 23,000 casualties

while the South suffered 28,000,

more than a third of Lee's army.

The battle was the deadliest in the Civil War

and prompted Lincoln's iconic Gettysburg address

four and a half months later

at the dedication of the Soldiers' National Cemetery.

Although the fighting continued for nearly two more years,

Gettysburg was an irrevocable turning point in the war

in the Union's favor.

Number seven, Hue City during the Vietnam War.

The North Vietnamese captured

the venerated capital city of Hue

as part of the Tet offensive,

a coordinated series of attacks on over 100 American

and South Vietnamese positions countrywide.

The battle to regain Hue began in February 1968

and lasted nearly a month,

as Marines ferociously drove North Vietnamese

and Communist Viet Cong forces from the city.

The Perfume River divided the city of Hue in two.

To the north was the Citadel,

a three-square mile fortress

surrounded by walls 30 feet high

and up to 40 feet thick,

with a moat on three sides

and the river on the 4th.

To the south, the smaller and more modern section of Hue

was connected to the Citadel by a bridge.

U.S. Marines and soldiers were tasked with clearing out

the entrenched enemy in the southern portion of the city,

while the Army of the Republic of Vietnam,

or ARVN,

would clear out the Northern portion and the citadel.

Untrained for urban combat,

U.S. battalions had to come up

with tactics and techniques on the spot

while facing a brutal enemy.

The process was methodical,

time-consuming,

and casualty heavy.

They went from house to house

and room to room to gain ground.

Speed, surprise,

and shock were essential to achieve victory.

After clearing the south side,

U.S. battalions broke into the Citadel from the bridge

to assist ARVN troops.

Finally, on February 24th,

the South Vietnamese flag flew over the citadel.

On March 2nd, the longest sustained infantry battle

the war had seen to that point

was officially declared over.

Casualties were high on both sides.

The U.S. suffered 216 dead,

1,364 wounded.

South Vietnamese losses totaled 384 dead,

with 1,830 wounded,

and thousands of civilians

were caught in the the cross-fire or murdered.

The North Vietnamese casualties included 5,000 dead

and countless more wounded.

Virtually all of Hue was destroyed,

leaving roughly 100,000 homeless.

While technically a win for the U.S. and South Vietnamese,

the news coverage of the event

shocked the American population

and broke their faith in the war.

U.S. troops would not experience

that intensity of urban fighting again

for another 36 years,

until the second battle of Fallujah,

which is number six on our list.

The Second Battle of Fallujah was the bloodiest battle

American troops fought in the entire Iraq conflict

and the deadliest battle for the Marine Corps

since Hue City in 1968.

From November through December 2004,

a joint American, British, and Iraqi-government offensive

fought to clear the insurgents

from their Anbar Province stronghold.

An estimated 4,000 enemy combatants

were in the city when the fighting began.

It's even suspected

that al-Qaeda terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

held his headquarters there.

They fortified their defenses before the attack,

preparing spider holes, traps, and concealed IEDs

throughout the town.

They created propane bombs hidden in buildings,

cut off access to escape routes and roofs,

and designed fields of fire

where they believed coalition forces would maneuver.

Nearly 70% of the civilian population fled the city,

reducing civilian casualties

and allowing coalition forces to launch their assault.

Army, Marine, and Iraqi forces attacked with an air barrage,

followed by an insertion of Marines and Navy Seabees,

who bulldozed obstacles.

The worst of the fighting continued for the first week,

but insurgents resisted throughout the six-week campaign.

By the end of December,

82 U.S. troops were killed,

with another 600 wounded.

British and Iraqi forces sustained 12 killed,

with another 53 wounded.

Over 2,000 insurgents were killed,

while another 1200 were captured.

Keeping with Post-9/11,

let's talk about Afghanistan.

Specifically, number five on our list,

the Battle of Sangin.

The Battle of Sangin was one of the deadliest campaigns

in Operation Enduring Freedom.

The Sangin River Valley was a Taliban stronghold

and was considered the center of opium production.

In 2010, United States Marines

replaced the British forces in Sangin

and initiated a deadly campaign

to clear out the insurgent presence in the region.

The counterinsurgency lasted for four years,

and during this time Marines sustained casualties

at some of the highest rates seen

during the 17-year conflict in Afghanistan.

IEDs peppered the landscape,

killing or maiming hundreds.

During the height of the fighting,

there was daily contact with the enemy

just meters outside allied FOBs.

In October 2010,

3rd Battalion 5th Marines began

a 7-month tour that would kill dozens of them in action

and injure hundreds more,

with at least 34 of them becoming

single, double, or triple amputees.

But the "Dark Horse" Marines made progress

extending their security perimeter

and clearing Highway 611,

which allowed for the transportation

and operation of future units.

By 2012, Sangin was transformed

from a battlefield into a thriving rural town,

but the price was over 100 British and American lives lost

and hundreds more wounded.

The Taliban never fully released their hold on Sangin,

and today, the area remains in contention.

Number four on our list

is the only air-to-air fight we'll cover.

It's decidedly less deadly than any other battle here,

but the tactics and implications merit a discussion.

So, let's talk about Operation Bolo,

the biggest air battle in the Vietnam War

and one of the most successful ambush actions

in military history.

In the last months of 1966,

the North Vietnamese Army's MiG-21 Fishbed

had become more active and successful at intercepting

the F-105 Thunderchief formations

of the United States Air Force.

The F-105 "Thuds" were super-sonic fighter-bombers

with the mission

of destroying communist air defense systems.

They did this in the role of the Wild Weasels,

a group that would fly slow

and low enough to bait the communist surface-to-air systems

into targeting them,

thus giving away the enemy position

and allowing the Wild Weasels to attack and destroy.

But with the MiG-21 added to the fight,

the Thuds were falling vulnerable to air-to-air attacks.

The U.S. Air Force decided

they needed to neutralize the MiG threat.

Air Force legend and World War II ace,

Colonel Robin Olds,

designed a gutsy plan to accomplish this.

Known as Operation Bolo,

the mission was to lure the enemy MiGs into battle

by hiding supersonic F-4C jets among the slower

and less-maneuverable Thud formations.

On January 2nd, 1967,

Olds and his formation of phantoms

took to the cloudy skies to fly the F-105 bomb run.

They kept to the F-105 speed

and flew in the F-105 formation.

The NVA took the bait and engaged.

Popping up from the clouds,

the Fishbeds attacked in pairs.

Olds and his formation began a legendary dogfight,

where US forces exploited their tactical

and technical advantage over the enemy.

Within 13 minutes,

seven MiGs were destroyed,

roughly half the NVA Mig -21 fleet.

The Americans hauled ass back to Thailand

with zero casualties.

In the next week,

similar missions took out more communist aircraft.

As a result,

the North Vietnamese were forced

to ground their aircraft for several months

as they re-trained their pilots

and sought new air defense tactics.

Colonel Olds remains the only U.S. Air Force ace

with victories in both World War II and Vietnam.

To illustrate how terrible

it can be when our birds are shot down,

number three on our list is Mogadishu.

On December 9, 1992,

1,800 United States Marines arrived in Mogadishu, Somalia

to help affect peace in the war-torn country.

As part of Operation Restore Hope,

the Marines supported

international aid workers in the country

for humanitarian aid operations,

including food and supply distribution.

In 1993, President Bill Clinton reduced the U.S. presence

as the United Nations

formally assumed responsibility for operations.

In June, however, Pakistani UN peacekeepers were ambushed

by militias loyal to Somali warlord

General Mohammad Farrah Aidid,

and 24 UN soldiers from Pakistan were killed.

In response, the UN authorized the arrest of Aidid,

and President Clinton dispatched 160 Army Rangers

and Delta Force operators

on a mission to capture the warlord

and other leaders of his militia.

The operation went disastrously wrong.

The first Black Hawk was struck by an RPG,

killing the pilot and co- pilot in the crash,

and injuring five more passengers,

including one who would die later from his wounds.

A rescue mission retrieved the rest of the survivors,

but then the second Black Hawk was struck,

killing three in the crash.

Pilot Mike Durant survived,

but his back and leg were broken

and he was taken prisoner.

Two Delta Force operators,

Gary Gordon and Randy Shughart,

were killed attempting to rescue Durant,

who was held prisoner for 11 days

until his release was secured

through diplomatic negotiations.

Gordon and Shughart would be posthumously awarded

the Medal of Honor for their actions.

President Bill Clinton immediately ordered

the withdrawal of American troops from Somalia,

and other U.N. countries followed suit,

leaving the region unstable

and without a functioning government.

Moving on, let's talk about World War Two,

a conflict where military fatalities

were estimated between 50 and 80 million.

Number two on our list is Iwo Jima.

In the final stretch of World War II,

the allies sought to gain control

of strategic islands in the Pacific.

Iwo Jima was a barren Pacific Island

located roughly 660 miles from Japan,

making it an ideal forward-deployed location

for the Allies and Axis powers alike.

On February 19, 1945,

after three days of naval and aerial bombardments

which launched over 6,800 tons of bombs and 22,000 shells,

the first wave of United States Marines stormed

Iwo Jima's volcanic shores.

Over 21,000 Japanese were there to greet them,

heavily entrenched in a complex network

of underground tunnels and artillery positions.

What followed was some of the most violent fighting

of the Pacific in World War Two,

due in large part to the determination

of the Japanese to die before they would surrender.

The Japanese burned any vegetation

that might have provided the Marines with cover,

then launched artillery fire

at the Marines' exposed locations.

Naval Seabees got to work on U-S artillery positions,

forward command posts,

and field hospitals,

all while holding their own in the fight.

The iconic raising of the American Flag over Mount Suribachi

took place four days into the battle,

but the fighting continued for a month.

Marines used artillery

and flamethrowers to destroy enemy defenses,

and the final battle on March 26th

included a massive attack against the Americans

that ultimately came down to hand-to-hand combat.

In the end,

nearly all of the Japanese defenders were killed,

except for a couple hundred prisoners.

6,000 Americans died helping to take the island,

with 17,000 more wounded.

Finally, number one,

ranked for its intensity, carnage, and outcome.

D-Day.

D-Day was the largest air, land,

and sea operation undertaken to date

and a logistics marvel.

One of the most important battles in World War II,

it turned the tide of the conflict in the Allies' favor

and eventually led to their victory in Europe.

The original invasion date was set for May,

but due to poor weather conditions

it was postponed until June.

Despite the continued poor weather,

Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces,

General Eisenhower,

gave the order to attack.

D-Day would commence on June 6, 1944.

On Eisenhower's orders,

roughly 176,000 troops embarked

on their journey from England to France

on 6,000 landing craft, ships, and other vessels.

Just before midnight,

airborne troops parachuted into occupied France,

surprising the Germans.

Air and naval bombardments were underway

to weaken the German defenses

before the main invasion began.

At 6:30 a.m., land insertions struck across five sectors

in a 60 mile coastal stretch of Normandy.

British and Canadian troops overcame light opposition

to capture Gold, Juno, and Sword beaches,

as did the Americans at Utah.

But the American G.I.'s at Omaha faced a tough fight.

The aerial and naval bombardment had done little

to diminish the heavily fortified German defenses,

both on the shore

and on the cliffs above the beaches.

Allied amphibious tanks were launched too far from shore

and only 2 out of 29 made it to the beach.

Many soldiers drowned in the waves,

dragged down by the weight of their rucksacks

and many more were mowed down by the constant German fire.

Small groups of Americans managed

to make it across the beach

and traverse up the cliffs.

Allied casualties on June 6 have been estimated

at 10,000 killed, wounded, and missing in action,

consisting of 6,600 Americans,

2,700 British,

and 946 Canadians.

By the end of the day,

155,000 Allied troops successfully stormed

and held Normandy's beaches.

By August 21st, the allies had successfully landed

over two million men in Northern France

and suffered 226,386 casualties.

German losses included over 240,000 casualties

and 200,000 captured.

Between 13,000 and 20,000 French civilians died,

and many more were seriously wounded.

The success of the invasion

was the beginning of the end of the war in Europe.

It forced the Germans to fight a two-front war

with the Soviets on the East

and U.S., British, and Canadian forces on the west.

The Nazi Third Reich would fall the following May.

So, join in this conversation

and let us know

which battles you think should make our next list.

Also, don't forget to hit that thumbs up

and make sure you subscribe.

For more infomation >> Top 10 Most Intense Battles in US History - Duration: 18:14.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Commercial Cargo Craft Heads to the Space Station - Duration: 10:50.

ONE MINUTE 30 SECONDS

>> MARK.

>> AGAIN, JUST A LITTLE UNDER A

MINUTE AND A HALF WAY FROM

LAUNCH.

ONLY ABOUT A 9-MINUTE RIGHT IN

TO ORBIT.

SO THE NEXT 10 MINUTES A LOT

MORE EXCITING FOR US HERE AS

ANTARES IS ABOUT TO LIFT OFF

FROM THE WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY

IN VIRGINIA.

>> IT.

-MINUS ONE MINUTE.

>> MARK.

>> FUEL TANK PRESSURIZATION

STARTED.

>> ROGER THAT, CORE ONE.

>> T-MINUS 30 SECONDS.

>> MARK.

>> T-MINUS 10.

MARK.

>> FIVE, FOUR, THREE, TWO, ONE.

>> AND ANTARES LIFTING OFF GOING

ACROSS THE NIGHT SKY.

DISAPPEARING THROUGH SOME CLOUDS

QUICKLY AND COMING QUICKLY BACK

IN TO VIEW.

THE FIRST STAGE LOOKING NOMINAL

OR NORMAL SO FAR.

LIGHTING UP THE NIGHT SCARE

THERE ABOVE VIM VERGE ORBITAL

ATK'S ANTARES IS ON ITS WAY.

>> GETTING GOOD PERFORMANCE

CALLS THE ATTITUDE AND

ORIENTATION OF THE ROCKET

LOOKING NORMAL.

>> VEHICLE DOES HAVE MAX "Q."

>> THE VEHICLE JUST PASSING

THROUGH MAXIMUM AERODYNAMIC

PRESSURE WHERE THE FORCES OF

LAUNCH THE HIGHEST ON THE LAUNCH

VEHICLE.

FIRST STAGE, THOUGH, CONTINUING

ON IT FIRE.

IT'S GOING TO CUT OFF ABOUT 215

SECONDS IN TO THE FLIGHT.

OR JUST A LITTLE OVER THREE

MINUTES.

[ CHEERING AND APPLAUSE ]

>> PRESSURES NOMINAL.

LOOKS GOOD.

VEHICLE ATTITUDE IS NOMINAL.

>> JUST PASSING 100,000 FETAL

TOOT AND 7,000 FEET PER SECOND.

ENGINES REMAIN AT FULL THRUST.

ATTITUDE IS STILL GOOD.

AVIONICS POWER IS GOOD.

STEERING LOOKS GOOD.

PASSING 150,000 FEET.

ENGINE IS STEADY HAS 100 PERCENT

THRUST AS WE PASS 10,000 FEET.

>> GREAT' NATION NOW AS GET THE

PERFORMANCE CALLS STILL FROM THE

ORBITAL ATK FLIGHT ENGINEERS.

EVERYTHING LOOKING GOOD SO FAR

WITH ANTARES.

AS YOU CAN CESAR AT ANNAL TOOT

OF OVER 38 MILES AND CLIMBING.

THE VEHICLE APPROACHING

6,000 MILES AN HOUR IN VELOCITY

ALREADY.

YOU CAN SEE ITS FLIGHT PATH IN

THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER.

AGAIN, IT FLIES IN THE

SOUTHEASTERLY THAT STRICT ARE

YOU AWAY FROM VIRGINIA OUT OVER

THE ATLANTIC OCEAN.

>> PASSING 15,000 FEET PER

SECOND.

>> WE ARE GOING TO BE STANDING

BY FOR MAIN ENGINE CUT OFF FOR

THE FIRST TIME.

>> AND WE ARE MIKKO.

>> MEKO THAT MAIN ENGINE CUT OFF

IS CONFIRM.

THE FUEL GONE, JOB DONE,

DROPPING WAY.

>> COAST FACE NOW WAIT FOR THIS

RIGHT CONDITIONS.

>> AS MATT DESCRIBED NOW WE ARE

IN A BIT OF A COAST STAGE HERE.

>> SHORT COAST FACE HERE AND

NEXT EVENT WILL BE THE FAIRING

SEPARATION.

>> WE HAVE NOMINAL STAGE ONE

BURDEN OF PROOF OUT VELOCITY,

JUST OVERS 17,300 FEET PER

SECOND.

WE HAVE FAIRING SEPARATION.

AND INNER STAGE SEPARATION.

>> THE FAIRING AND THE INNER

STAGE DROPPING WAY, CYGNUS IN

THE SECOND STAGE NOW

EX-POSITIONED.

WE HAVE STAGE TWO HE CAN ANYONE,

A GOOD COP WERE BE CONFIRMATION

THE SOLID ROCKET MOTOR IS

IGNITED.

>> BURN FOR APPROXIMATELY 150

SECONDS.

STAGE TWO ATTITUDE IS NOMINAL.

STAGE 2TBC PERFORMANCE LOOKS

GOOD.

>> EVERYTHING LOOKING GREAT.

THE VEHICLE TRAVELING IN EXCESS

OF 10,000 MILES AN HOUR FOR

100 MILES IN ALTITUDE.

AS WE ARE JUST A LITTLE OVER

FIVE MINUTES IN TO THE FLIGHT

ALREADY.

>> POWER SYSTEMS REMAIN GOOD.

STAGE 2TBC IS NOMINAL.

APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY THROUGH

STAGE TWO BURN AT THIS POINT.

AVIONICS SYSTEMS REMAIN HEALTHY

AT THIS POINT.

STAGE 2TBC IS NOMINAL.

>> JUST ABOUT ONE MINUTE LEFT ON

THE SECOND STAGE FIRING.

>> ALL SYSTEMS ARE PERFORMING

WELL AT THIS POINT.

>> AS YOU ARE HEARING EVERYTHING

IS LOOKING GOOD WITH CYGNUS AND

THE AN TEAR EASE ROCKET.

>> POWER REMAINS GOOD.

>> ATTITUDE REMAINS KNOWLEDGE

FAMILIAR.

MOTOR PRESSURE STARTING TO TAIL

OFF.

POWER SOMETIMES REMAIN GOOD.

>> STAGE TWO -- AND WE HAVE

STAGE TWO BURN OUT.

ANTARES WILL NOW COAST FOR

APPROXIMATELY TWO MINUTES BEFORE

PAYLOAD SEPARATION.

FTS IS DISABLED.

>> WITH THAT SECOND STAGE CUT

OFF AND THE COAST NOW YOU WERE

WAY THE ANTARES ROCKET LARGELY

HAS DONE ITS JOB SO FAR.

IT WILL CONTINUE TO COAST.

WE'LL GET THESE PERFORMANCE

CALLS FROM THE ORBITAL

ENGINEERS, BUT EVERYTHING IS

STILL LOOKING REGULAR I GOOD FOR

CYGNUS, SOON GOING TO BE IN ITS

PRELIMINARY ORBIT AND THEN GET

READY TO DEPLOY THE SOLAR ARRAYS

FOLLOWING THAT.

AND BEGIN ITS CHASE DOWN OF THE

INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION.

>> POWER SOMETIMES ALL LOOK GOOD

AT THIS POINT.

POWER IS NOMINAL.

ATTITUDE REMAINS NOMINAL AS WE

AWAIT PAYLOAD SEPARATION.

POWER IS STILL GOOD.

ATTITUDE IS NOMINAL.

POWER IS KNOWLEDGE FAMILIAR.

ATTITUDE IS GOOD.

POWER IS NOMINAL.

>> NOW WE ARE STANDING BY FOR

THE PAYLOAD SEPARATION.

>> POWER SYSTEMS REMAIN HEALTHY.

AND WE HAVE CYGNUS

SPACECRAFT SEPARATION.

For more infomation >> U.S. Commercial Cargo Craft Heads to the Space Station - Duration: 10:50.

-------------------------------------------

Does Iron Fist Imperialism Benefit US Workers? - Duration: 13:47.

SHARMINI PERIES: It's The Real News Network.

I'm Sharmini Peries, coming to you from Baltimore.

Imperialism, a highly contested term in political science- one form of imperialism is the act

of using your military for expanding and extending borders and conquering land.

Now, there is a less invasive form, at least less invasive militarily, but imperialism

also could include gaining influence through political and economic means- why, a free

market economy, which also subjugates foreign countries, to adhere to the national interests

of the imperial state via the market place.

Now, we saw both of these forms of imperialism coming together when we, meaning the US, invaded

Iraq.

Now, the U.S. Invasion of Iraq was done under a false claim that Saddam Hussein and Iraq

had weapons of mass destruction.

Now, they did this to gain access to exploiting the natural resources that Iraq had, which

is oil, and getting rid of Saddam Hussein, really helped order to gain control of the

oil wells, he oil contracts, the resources, and the oil itself coming out of Iraq.

Now, if the British empire grew very powerful by dominating foreign markets, natural resources,

and of course cheap labor in the colonies, so could the U.S.

Now, Karl Marx posed the question if it is worth it to impoverish millions of workers

in the East Indies in order to procure for just one point five million workers in England

in the same industry.

Now, that question has become even more relevant today, when it comes to the U.S., and its

mission, or imperialistic ambitions, abroad.

Now, President Trump, during his inauguration, drew a direct connection between U.S. imperialism

and the U.S. working class, and how his plans, his vision, for the United States could benefit

its workers.

Let's listen.

DONALD TRUMP: From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.

America first.

Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs, will be made to benefit

American workers and American families.

SHARMINI PERIES: In a new book, titled Changing Face of Imperialism, edited by Sunanda Sen

and Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Professor Gerald Epstein has a chapter in that book he wrote

a while ago, "Do U.S. Workers Gain from U.S. Imperialism?"

In this chapter, Gerald Epstein calculated that between 1985 and 2000, the bottom eighty

percent of Americans lost between four hundred billion and 2.8 eight trillion dollars as

a direct result of US imperialism.

Well, on to talk about this with me is Gerald Epstein.

He is co-director of the Political Economy Research Institute at UMass Amherst, and he's

professor of economics there as well.

Good to have you back with us, Gerry.

GERALD EPSTEIN: Thank you for having me.

SHARMINI PERIES: Gerry, let's start with the why you embarked on this endeavor in the first

place, to explore if the U.S. worker actually gained some benefits from U.S. imperialism.

GERALD EPSTEIN: Right, as you said- you know, I wrote this chapter actually quite a while

ago, just as the United States was about to invade Iraq in 2003.

And the question I was asking myself is- well, this seemed to be a wildly popular decision

on the part of the Bush administrations, George W. Bush, including among workers.

And my- the question I was asking myself is, why?

This seemed like such a despicable, immoral, and crazy act.

Why was it so wildly popular among people including U.S. working class?

GERALD EPSTEIN: So, I decided to actually go out and look, try to put together a conceptual

framework, look at the numbers, and see whether, in the recent past at that time, U.S. workers

had benefited from U.S. imperialism.

And, as you suggested in your introduction, there are different ways think about imperialism.

One is, imperialism that involves the use of military force to achieve hegemony over

other countries and extract benefits from them.

And since I was interested in the invasion of Iraq, I decided to try to estimate mostly

that kind of imperialism.

And there's a more informal type of imperialism, just based on various kinds of subtle powers

the U.S. might have.

It influenced the International Monetary Fund, other countries' trade policies, their foreign

aid policies, et cetera.

These I put on one side.

So, I was really looking at what I call "the iron fist" of Imperialism, the involvement

of a military force.

And I found, as you suggested, that in fact U.S. workers, in the fifteen years before

the invasion, lost from U.S. imperialism.

And so, I tried to calculate both the benefits and the costs.

So, what could the possible benefits to U.S. workers be?

Well, Michael Klare and others argue that a lot of U.S. Foreign policy has been directed

towards controlling oil in the Middle East.

And clearly, the invasion of Iraq was connected with that whole endeavor- to control the supply

of oil.

So, one issue is, well, who benefits from oil prices being lower and oil prices being

more stable?

A second role of imperialism is, for the United States, to be able to borrow money from the

rest of the world at an incredibly low interest rate because of the role of the dollar, which

is maintained partly by military force that the United States exerts.

So, what is the benefit of workers, of getting lower-interest loans from the rest of the

world and getting things more cheaply.

So, those are benefits.

What are the costs to U.S. workers?

Well of course, there's the cost of blood, human life.

A lot of the military is supplied by U.S. workers.

But I didn't include that, that's clearly negative.

But the other cost is the budgetary expenditure, military expenditures, which in the United

States are massive.

And who pays for those, who pays the tax burden to pay for those military expenditures?

So, when I added it all up, what I came out with was the figures you mentioned- was that,

in fact, the U.S. worker, as a group, you can measure them as a lower sixty percent

of the income distribution, the lower eighty percent of the income distribution lost.

tremendously, as much as two trillion dollars or so, economically from imperialism.

I also conjectured that, is this always true?

In the 1960s, 1950s, 1970s- I didn't study this period, but I looked at it- and it seemed

like the argument is stronger that during that period, U.S. workers did benefit from

some of the imperialistic adventures that the U.S. government engaged in.

Part of the reason is because U.S. workers didn't have to pay as much of the burden.

The tax system was much more progressive in those times.

Richer people paid a higher percentage of taxes and the cost of military adventures

were less.

By the time of the 1980s, U.S. workers clearly were not benefiting economically from this.

So, if U.S. workers are supporting these kinds of military adventures, it's not really for

economic reasons, according to my analysis.

Something else is going on, which kind of raises the question, what could be going on

in the future if President Trump and his administration decides to get into another war in the Middle

East, say with Iran, or other military adventures?

Would they be popular among U.S. workers?

And it's unlikely it would be so for economic reasons.

There would have to be other reasons.

SHARMINI PERIES: So, Gerry, the tendency of the working class to actually be right wing

and support wars, which is a well-known phenomenon- you know, most of the right-wing sections

of the United States tend to be supporters of military action by the United States.

Now, even when it is obvious that empires and missions of the empire serve mainly the

upper classes, it is often the lower classes that actually have to pay the price.

It is the lower classes that are mainly in the military.

And so, I think Mark's referred to this as "false consciousness" on the part of the working

class.

Do you think that by measuring and publishing the cost of the empire, the way you have,

and its impact it's having on the working class, is it possible to conceive that people

will abandon the kind of thinking that they are having, about war-mongering in particular?

GERALD EPSTEIN: Well, I think the roots of this kind of support for military adventures,

just as the roots xenophobia and the roots of racism and anti-immigrant feelings and

so forth, are much deeper than pure economics.

I guess my view is that it could help.

I mean, at the margins, publishing these kinds of- this kind of information, pointing out

the economic costs to people who might otherwise support these kinds of policies- especially

since Trump, in this case, has really put it in economic terms you know putting America

first helping workers So, to confront that kind of argument directly may have a small

impact, and I think it's worth doing.

SHARMINI PERIES: And to dispel the myths associated with this kind of empire, mission of the empire

impacting the workers, what are some of the big data items that we could draw on to shift

public opinion?

GERALD EPSTEIN: Well, first of all, the cost of the military and who's paying the taxes

to support the military, or whose government benefits are being cut as a result of this

kind of expenditure.

That's number one.

Number two, of course, is who's paying the price in terms of having to be, as you said,

in the military losing their lives.

The impact on veterans is such a heavy price, and the government is not taking care of the

veterans.

These are all things which are, in some sense, obvious.

But it's worth harping on, being clear on, in terms of these kinds of costs.

Ultimately, though, there's a huge moral question, you know.

Is it morally correct to engage in this kind of destructive activity, killing thousands

of people in other countries, under these kinds of conditions?

And of course, the answer is no.

So, I don't mean that these economic arguments should displace the much more important strategic

and moral issues.

But it's an additional argument to emphasize.

SHARMINI PERIES: All right.

I know various economists like yourself and Joseph Stiglitz, who wrote the book on the

three trillion-dollar cost of the war in Iraq, for example, are trying to draw attention

to it.

I hope that it starts to catch on in a more popular way, because I think that's when people

really realize, you know, we are paying for this and we are losing our lives, and we need

to do something about it.

So, I thank you so much for joining us today, Gerald, and I do hope you come back soon.

GERALD EPSTEIN: Okay, thanks Sharmini.

SHARMINI PERIES: And thank you for joining us here on The Real News Network.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét