Chủ Nhật, 20 tháng 5, 2018

Auto news on Youtube May 20 2018

Former U S Prosecutor Says It's Time For John Brennan to LAWYER UP

Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova just advised John Brennan to get himself a "good lawyer."

DiGenova predicts that Brennan, the former head of the CIA for Obama, will find himself

in front of grand jury very shortly for his part in the "set up" and spy scheme against

President Trump. Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for

the District of Columbia, suggested John Brennan "get himself a good lawyer," saying the

former head of the CIA is "going to be in front of a grand jury shortly."

Appearing on Fox News Channel's "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Digenova charged that

Hillary Clinton "was illegally exonerated" in the private email server probe and that

"there was a substantial effort to frame" President Donald Trump.

"We know that Hillary Clinton was illegally exonerated. We knew that a year ago," the

former prosecutor said when asked to recap special counsel Robert Mueller's 1-year

probe of Russian collusion.

"We know that there was a substantial effort to frame the current president of the United

States with crimes by infiltrating his campaign and then his administration with spies that

the FBI had set upon them.

"We have learned that the crimes were committed by the FBI, senior members of the Department

of Justice, John Brennan, Mr. [James] Clapper, Mr. [James] Comey and others associated with

the Democratic Party," he continued. "And Donald Trump and his associates committed

no crimes."

If that wasn't damning enough, DiGenova then laid out an outrageous claim.

"Categorically and unequivocally, it has been proved that the FBI, in violation of

all guidelines, all legislation — and I believe they committed crimes in doing so

— purposely sent people into the Trump campaign to plant false information, then force that

information to be forwarded back to CIA, and then funneled to the FBI, to be used as false

information in FISA applications," he said.

"Everybody involved in that process, who knowingly participated, committed a crime,"

DiGenova concluded.

He explained to Carlson that "criminal referrals have already been made."

"And I suggest that Mr. Brennan, who loves to make comments about the process, get himself

a good lawyer not a good writer," DiGenova said.

"Yes, NBC News' consultant, the former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,

the most partisan hack leader of the CIA in history needs a very, very good lawyer."

DiGenova added, "He's going to be in front of a grand jury shortly."

Brennan became a focal point this week when former NSA Director Mike Rogers and former

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper contradicted his claim that the unverified

Trump dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign had no influence on allegations of

Russian interference in the 2016 election.

As noted by Mollie Hemingway, the senior editor for The Federalist, Brennan has "a history"

of not being honest.

Mollie Hemingway: Let's not forget, former CIA head John Brennan has a history of lying…

and spying https://t.co/CeBLGLLokG pic.twitter.com/DlAOkd4Fwg

For more infomation >> Former U S Prosecutor Says It's Time For John Brennan to LAWYER UP - Duration: 12:15.

-------------------------------------------

This Former U.S. Prosecutor Says It's Time For - Duration: 13:41.

This Former U.S. Prosecutor Says It's Time For John Brennan to LAWYER UP

Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova just advised John Brennan to get himself a "good lawyer."

DiGenova predicts that Brennan, the former head of the CIA for Obama, will find himself

in front of grand jury very shortly for his part in the "set up" and spy scheme against

President Trump.

From Bizpacreview.com

Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, suggested John Brennan

"get himself a good lawyer," saying the former head of the CIA is "going to be in

front of a grand jury shortly."

Appearing on Fox News Channel's "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Digenova charged that

Hillary Clinton "was illegally exonerated" in the private email server probe and that

"there was a substantial effort to frame" President Donald Trump.

"We know that Hillary Clinton was illegally exonerated.

We knew that a year ago," the former prosecutor said when asked to recap special counsel Robert

Mueller's 1-year probe of Russian collusion.

"We know that there was a substantial effort to frame the current president of the United

States with crimes by infiltrating his campaign and then his administration with spies that

the FBI had set upon them.

"We have learned that the crimes were committed by the FBI, senior members of the Department

of Justice, John Brennan, Mr. [James] Clapper, Mr. [James] Comey and others associated with

the Democratic Party," he continued.

"And Donald Trump and his associates committed no crimes."

If that wasn't damning enough, DiGenova then laid out an outrageous claim.

"Categorically and unequivocally, it has been proved that the FBI, in violation of

all guidelines, all legislation — and I believe they committed crimes in doing so

— purposely sent people into the Trump campaign to plant false information, then force that

information to be forwarded back to CIA, and then funneled to the FBI, to be used as false

information in FISA applications," he said.

"Everybody involved in that process, who knowingly participated, committed a crime,"

DiGenova concluded.

He explained to Carlson that "criminal referrals have already been made."

"And I suggest that Mr. Brennan, who loves to make comments about the process, get himself

a good lawyer not a good writer," DiGenova said.

"Yes, NBC News' consultant, the former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,

the most partisan hack leader of the CIA in history needs a very, very good lawyer."

DiGenova added, "He's going to be in front of a grand jury shortly."

Brennan became a focal point this week when former NSA Director Mike Rogers and former

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper contradicted his claim that the unverified

Trump dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign had no influence on allegations of

Russian interference in the 2016 election.

As noted by Mollie Hemingway, the senior editor for The Federalist, Brennan has "a history"

of not being honest.

Mollie Hemingway: Let's not forget, former CIA head John Brennan has a history of lying…

and spying https://t.co/CeBLGLLokG pic.twitter.com/DlAOkd4Fwg

— Conservative

News (@BIZPACReview) May 17, 2018

For more infomation >> This Former U.S. Prosecutor Says It's Time For - Duration: 13:41.

-------------------------------------------

Sunday Morning Futures Rep. Nunes: Show us the information that led to FISA warrant - Duration: 13:01.

welcome back we are back with this exclusive interview with House

Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunez and mr. chairman a moment ago

before we went to break you said it was the mother of all leaks conducted by the

Department of Justice what were you referring to well there were two

mainstream media outlets on a Friday night that had lots and lots and lots of

details if any of those details are correct so remember we don't have any

documents we can't confirm whether there's an informant or not informant

because we've never been told or nor given documents and in fact we've never

even asked for the name of any informants or any sources whatsoever so

if any of that is true if they ran a spy ring or an informant

ring and they were paying people within the Trump campaign if any of that is

true that is an absolute redline there is not an honest person in this country

who can believe that taxpayer dollars going to to fund this ring and and

operate like this like what settings in the New York Times I think it would have

quite a bit you know quite a bit of detail on it if any of that is true this

is a red line in this country you can't do this to political campaigns but I

mean this was done I mean according to them this was done in in the spring

before the counterintelligence investigation was even open if that's

true we need to know about it so well the New York Times reports and and the

Washington Post that somebody was paid somebody was paid and they were

interacting with the Trump campaign you want to call it spying fine but somebody

was paid isn't that right that's what the New York Times says if they paid

someone it's an absolute redline and this is over with I mean I don't know

how to say this I mean there is no possible way that that we should be

allowing even if it was legal we should never allow this in the Senate country

Congress should not allow for anything like this to ever occur again to any

political campaign if it in fact happened which is why I'll say again all

they got to do is provide us the documentation if they didn't do anything

like that provide us a document so we can verify it well when you say this is

over what do you mean this is over I mean we

we have criminal referrals from the inspector general it's over when I say

it's over it meaning that that this whole thing is a scam I mean that

there's real FISA abuse here if there is real I mean they're real FISA B's I just

can't imagine if what's if it what's in that these stories is true how can any

Americans stand for this and look we're we're a separate branch of government

we've set up these capabilities we have a responsibility to oversee these

capabilities and and I'll tell you there is not an honest person in this country

that thinks it's okay if sources informants whatever you want to call

them go around and start passing out money all over the globe to do what to

to secretly put yourself into a presidential campaign that's not

acceptable in this country the line does this go we know that Loretta Lynch and

and Sally Yates were briefed on the Trump campaign in 2016 in the spring of

2016 we know from Peter Strahm texts that he said and I quote President Obama

wants to know everything we're doing about on this and we know that Peter

struck told Lisa page we need an insurance policy should Donald Trump win

the presidency so who was calling the shots here well look there's a lot of

abuse here and so they they were briefed in the spring so we know that the FBI

briefed the highest levels of the Obama administration in the spring of 2016

shortly after that you have mr. steel that gets going he's being paid by the

Clinton campaign secretly he's also meeting with the FBI

he's digging up what ends up being totally phony dirt by the way who he

says he claims got it from Russians and so I don't know how clearly I can

possibly say this if anybody's looking for collusion all they have to do

between the Russians and a political party all they have to do is figure out

if in fact Christopher Steele talked to Russians because there you have your

collusion they took information from Russians and they used it against the

president President Trump and then they start it and then the Democrats pay for

it all yeah and and this is so so I don't even know what they're

investigating at this so what what what and Robert Mull will be looking at

that and then I mean Robert Muller's investigation has turned one it is one

year old this last week would he have looked at at collusion

between Hillary Clinton and the Russians then or is that not his man I doubt it

because I mean they've never even looked into there's all this talk about leak

about leaks what about the leak of general Flynn phone call with the

Russian ambassador what about that why don't we why don't we start there with

leaks yeah well that we know is a felony well

real quick the IG report is forthcoming what are you expecting from that IG

report will justice be served you know I don't have any idea this is the Clinton

email investigation I have not met with mr. Horowitz I don't even know exactly

what he's looking at other than what I've read in the press but I can tell

you the cast of characters that are involved in that investigation are the

same cast of characters that we are investigating at the House Intelligence

Committee as we look into FISA abuse and counterintelligence operation you're

also investigating the State Department anything new there yeah so well that's

the interesting thing about the State Department is is we're trying to figure

out how did this information make it over from London to the FBI we've never

been able to put that together because we were told many times and this was all

over you know it was leaked oh these were trusted 5i sources and you know

intelligence products well as you know we never found any intelligence products

as it relates to our five eyes partners sending us information so how did it get

through well we think the State Department because we have people

talking about this former State Department officials talking about this

so if that indeed happened now we have something that's totally irregular so

now you're taking information from the State Department you're opening up a

counterintelligence investigation into a political campaign that is to say the

least it's irregular and and we should point

out that on this program you've said in the past that Sidney Blumenthal and mr.

Sher Cody Sher were actually funneling information to the State Department

right you kind of have a you you kind of have all kinds of people right you've

got Christopher still working for the Democrats in the Hillary Clinton

campaign you've got Blumenthal and others who are tied and fellated with

the Clinton operation and then on the other side you have the f

yeah they're all about at the same time running investigations into Carter page

hmm man it's very rare it's it's very odd you make a lot of good points mr.

chairman real quick before you go you are also investigating China this is an

important storyline for us this morning as the president has come to some kind

of an agreement where the Chinese will buy more goods what my concern is is is

he going to take the national security part of this off the table the Chinese

do not want to deal with this 301 part of the Trade Act where the US can stop

China from from certain practices because of national security issues what

are you investigating China over so we have a really large investigation going

into and study I guess I should say into what is what our China strategic goals

globally so this week we had our first hearing we we had great witnesses that

people want to go to it they can they can review our testimony that was given

between before the house it was all made public right talking about military

strategy that the Chinese have all over the globe it's very very interesting and

it's an important topic so like always the presidents got to take China on they

have to be dealt with I commend them for that but we have to be careful that we

at the same time don't do anything to hurt the global economy mr. chairman

could you see this morning thanks very much thank you well the Justice

Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is preparing to release his

highly anticipated report on the FBI and the DOJ is handling of the investigation

into Hillary Clinton's emails that report expected soon it comes as

President Trump is calling for the department to allow Congress access to

documents linked to an FBI informant who spoke to some of his advisers during the

2016 presidential campaign joining me right now is House Intelligence

Committee Chairman Devin Nunez mr. chairman good to see you thanks so much

for joining us there's a lot of conversation about this informant on a

lot of other channels and in all sorts of newspapers what can you tell us in

terms of what went on well I can tell you that nobody was ever interested in

an informant we asked for specific documents that we still have not

received from the Department of Justice so they continue to leak out things

about this informant and we don't know if there's one informant or

or informants because there's so much out there now it's really getting tough

to follow and all we're asking for is give us the documentation that you used

to start this investigation and what you've been investigating is what

exactly launched an investigation into so-called collusion between Donald Trump

and the Russians is that right yeah so don't so remember we we discovered that

the dossier was used so this is the dirt that they dug up the Hillary Clinton

campaign and the Democrats used and then it got to the FBI and the FBI used it in

a FISA so we're trying to get to the bottom of you know what else was used in

that FISA because you have many people within the Department of Justice who are

claiming that we're wrong so if we're wrong show us the information well Jim

Comey it was interviewed by our own bret baier recently you know that and during

that interview Jim Comey said that there was more than just the dossier let's

roll that clip listen to this mr. Chairman I called the dossier unverified

salacious why did you use that to the FISA Court to ask for surveillance for

Carter page not only use it but you led with it a bulk of that Pfizer

application deals with that dossier why yeah that's not my recollection Bret and

I don't know that the FISA application has been released my recollection was it

was part of a broader mosaic of facts that were laid before the FISA judge to

obtain a FISA warrant broader mosaic of facts mr. chairman

yeah we're looking for the pieces to mr. Comey and the FBI's mosaic so you know

they've continued to say that this didn't happen even though we've had

career prosecutors going evaluate this we released a memo that we made public

for all of Americans to see that they had used this dirt that was bought and

paid for not verified before a FISA Court and then they continued to claim

no no no don't look here there's no FISA abuse at all and they're in total denial

so we have a right to get the information if if James Comey and many

others in current and people that are currently at the Department of Justice

today continued to say there's nothing to see here well if there's nothing to

see here show us the documents that we're asking

for the they refused to do it and how many documents have you gotten so far

from the 1.2 million documents that you've requested

well that's actually a different request related to the Clinton email

investigation okay we have been very specific we think there's only a handful

of documents left that we'd like to see but we never get the full story

the Department of Justice told Fox News they've invited you to the DOJ and you

haven't responded or you do you are you aware of this invitation to go to the

DOJ yeah so they continue to leak so so they we had a productive what I thought

was a productive meeting and then after that meeting they've done nothing but

leak and leak and leak now we don't know exactly who it is over the Department of

Justice or FBI I'm not pinning any blame on people but we're not going to go to

another meeting where we don't get documents and then the meeting leaks out

and you know they were trying and this is this should make people very

suspicious they were trying to get mr. Gowdy and I to go on Friday to the

Department of Justice supposedly another briefing we said look unless we're gonna

get documents we found out Thursday night they were not going to provide

documents so therefore we're not going to go now if you look what happened on

Friday night probably the mother of all leaks of all time - two major newspapers

that came out late Friday night yeah that's know if had mr. Gowdy and I went

to that meeting you can bet they would have tried to pin

that on us that's what I want to ask you about

you

For more infomation >> Sunday Morning Futures Rep. Nunes: Show us the information that led to FISA warrant - Duration: 13:01.

-------------------------------------------

Donald Trump says US troops will WITHDRAW from Syria as ISIS is defeated - Duration: 3:33.

Donald Trump says US troops will WITHDRAW from Syria as ISIS is defeated.

DONALD Trump says he will withdraw American forces from northwest Syria as ISIS is defeated,

US officials with knowledge of the decision said on Friday in a move which suggests the

President intends to keep his previous promises.

The US will leave areas dominated by Islamist factions and focus recovery efforts on areas

where US-led forces have retaken territory from Islamic State in the northeast.

Tens of millions of dollars will be cut from previous US-backed efforts in the northwest.

These include projects for "countering violent extremism, supporting independent society

and independent media, strengthening education, and advocating for community policing",

US officials said.

A State Department official added: "US assistance for programs in northwest Syria are being

freed up to provide potential increased support for priorities in northeast Syria."

A second official said the administration believed it wanted to move the assistance

to areas where the US had more control.

They added that humanitarian assistance would not be affected in the northwest around Idlib

province, which is the largest chunk of Syrian territory held by insurgent factions, including

al Qaeda's former affiliate in the Syrian war.

Trump said in March that it was time for the United States to leave Syria, following allied

victories against Islamic State militants.

Around 2,000 US troops are deployed in Syria.

In March, Trump froze more than $200 million (£148 million) in funds for recovery efforts

in Syria while his administration reassesses Washington's role in the Syrian conflict.

But in April Trump deepened US involvement by ordering missile strikes against Syria

in response to an alleged poison gas attack which killed dozens of people.

A third US official said the cuts in the northwest would take place over a period of months.

Adding: "The danger is a repeat of what the president criticised about Iraq - leaving

a vacuum where the violence can get worse and extremists can exploit that."

The Pentagon has estimated that Islamic State has lost about 98 per cent of the territory

it held in Iraq and Syria.

US military officials have warned that the militants could regain the freed areas quickly

unless they are stabilised.

Army Colonel Ryan Dillon warned of an apparent surge in terrorist attacks.

He said: "We have seen also not just reports, but also corroborated through our own intelligence

gathering, that ISIS is starting to conduct more attacks on the west side of the Euphrates

River outside of Abu Kamal against pro-regime forces.

"And then we've also seen – not corroborated by us, but in open source, the retaking of

neighbourhoods in southern Damascus."

He said intelligence had begun to notice the rise in ISIS attacks as early as January 2018

after the Turkish intervention in northwestern Syria as part of their "Operation Olive

Branch" to remove the US-backed, Kurdish YPG.

For more infomation >> Donald Trump says US troops will WITHDRAW from Syria as ISIS is defeated - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

China agrees to buy more U.S. goods to reduce trade imbalance - Duration: 1:00.

After series of high-level talks on bilateral trade in Washington this week, China and the

U.S. say they've agreed to work together to reduce the multibillion-U.S.-dollar trade

imbalance... as China increases its purchase of American goods and services.

According to the joint statement Saturday, China will be significantly increasing purchases

of U.S. goods and services, notably in the agriculture and energy sectors... to meet

its growing consumption needs,... and this is expected to help support growth and employment

in the U.S. Details on how much the imbalance will be

reduced have not been clarified.

But the move will lower concerns of a brewing trade war between the world's two largest

economies... as the two countries have been slapping tariffs on each others' goods and

services ever since the Trump administration took a hard line against China, arguing it

has stolen intellectual property.

For more infomation >> China agrees to buy more U.S. goods to reduce trade imbalance - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

Fake Address from United States Navy Demonstration Squadron - Duration: 2:08.

okay I have another one here I'm going to show you this is from I'm the this

was from the Blue Angels in 2007 here and this is the address they sent it to

Ashland Drive which is kind of strange because that wasn't actually my address

and it's since changed we were we were Pooler and now it's

Savannah but Ashland Drive this was not correct but it did get here and then

there's Sousa Blue Angels this was the video that I took I want to show you

this - this is the inside of the letter here and so here they they've addressed

it inside here it says Ashland Drive Pooler Georgia 3 132 - Navy flight

demonstration squad 3 9 0 San Carlos Road Suite a Pensacola Florida 3 - 508

May 29th 2007 and then it says dear miss Richardson on behalf of the 2007 US Navy

flight demonstration squadron I would like to express our sincere appreciation

for your assistance during our recent mishap investigation the video you shot

was extremely helpful to the investigators and the personal time and

effort you gave was remarkable thank you again for your outstanding support

sincerely Kay Mannix commander US Navy commanding officer so yeah I just wanted

to share that with you guys it was like it's it's strange that they put Ashland

Drive and and the mail got here with such a bizarre address and but you know

yeah I'm just gonna say that's strange that was really strange then it said

Pooler but we and we started out as polar than they changed it to Savannah

and but it comes up as Port Wentworth so it's consistently changing all the time

and so ok that's it

For more infomation >> Fake Address from United States Navy Demonstration Squadron - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

NUMBERS Synchronicity Postal Address History United States Army Military Coding - Duration: 6:13.

okay hi guys okay I have a series of synchronicities here I want to share

with you so this was from this one is from 1991 from Des Moines Iowa February

2nd this is the first address and so third in the second ACR and the strange

thing about this this is a date my son was born so this was actually I was

pregnant with him and this was during the time that the Gulf War was happening

but look at them the zip code which there's some sort of significance 4 or 5

in there the 45 45th president some strange synchronicities but we've got a

APO New York let's go on and I'm gonna show you more synchronicities that get

even more weird okay here is oh this one is really really weird maybe I should do

I really I should do these first that one's out of order so I need to do this

one first no yeah this one no I need to do this one first because this was the

next place we moved to which was one-one-nine that was Elizabethtown

Kentucky four to seven oh one so we lived off post in Elizabethtown I think

that was about the time they had that movie but that's where the horse racing

and everything was at and so then well we lived at Meadow View and so the next

one then we moved on post 47 11d but the seven-11 always kind of her makes me

think of 7-eleven Prichard place for zero one two one Fort Knox Kentucky but

that one didn't have that's strange it only has this may be the address or

the postmark is in here maybe I don't know

barcode maybe barcode is read from my sister in Jacksonville Florida and she

lives that was a meadow something meadows

maybe and so then okay so the next one okay so then this

is the last one there's these are weird this one is even worse I don't know

anything about the box but the CMR for our money think of that as information

now this this is the one zero nine one one two yeah

and so I found out last year who when I when I was experiencing one of those

heads apps that if you put two zero nine one one two into the phone that it

actually emergency services picks up and so yeah but I was experiencing those

weird head zaps but it says miss sent to APO zero nine one four seven I don't

know which one that is but then here is the last synchronicity now this is my

son and he was at Fort Benning Georgia he's in here and I'm not sure exactly

where he's at but this was his unit d11 nine and so I guess that's the weird

part then then I connect the synchronicity of this one like the D

whatever that is and I'm sure somebody knows but it has me thinking about like

okay so are they just using some sort of coding because DD actually I think of DD

as in double d double d double D size maybe there's some humor in there I

don't know June 17 2011 but then that's the opposite of 9-1-1 and yeah

Fort Benning Georgia and so there's the flag there's the guy holding the flag

and I'm not sure where my son is at exactly I'd have to ask him but I just

wanted to share that with you guys the weirdness of some of these well it has

me kind of feeling about that some of this is was created by a computer in

some capacity possibly that's that's all you know not

I'm not thinking anything sinister or anything like that just the fact that

maybe some of it was created by a computer especially with the military

and so it's my understanding that the military our United States military

learned how to code from the you know from the Native American Indians so

there's like a alternative type of coding but I know nine nine right now is

a popular number nine is being used the numbers four and five are being used but

I know they're just numbers too but and they can be taken out of context but

since then the APO is changed to APO AE which is I think it's America Europe

possibly or some America AE it has to do with Europe which let's see which one oh

here it is the APL AE but yeah I can see how that's kind of humor CMR 401 one

which is information a male is information but that is creepy and yet

creepy and it seems like a tentpole well yeah that's where I'm going with this is

that it's a tentpole of some sort tentpole related to addresses I'm

related to something else that someone else has a upper hand related to

information but that yeah that's just my kind of might but this is my own stuff

I'm looking at my own stuff being a military spouse so and a mother a mother

too so soldiers veterans actually so yeah so

see you guys soon and let me know what you think

For more infomation >> NUMBERS Synchronicity Postal Address History United States Army Military Coding - Duration: 6:13.

-------------------------------------------

Nearly 51 Million Households In The United States 'Can't Afford Basics Like Rent And Food' - Duration: 7:16.

Nearly 51 Million Households In The United States �Can�t Afford Basics Like Rent

And Food�

By Edward Morgan

If the U.S. economy is performing well, then why can�t 51 million households in the United

States �afford basics like rent and food�.

A stunning new report that was just put out by the United Way ALICE Project shows that

the gap between the wealthy and the poor in this country is perhaps the biggest that it

has been in any of our lifetimes.

In some of the wealthiest areas of the nation, homes are now selling for up to 100 million

dollars, but meanwhile tens of millions of families are barely scraping by from month

to month.

Many believe that this growing �inequality gap� is setting the stage for major societal

problems.

In general, the U.S. economy seems to be performing better than expected so far in 2018, but the

ranks of the poor and the working poor just continue to grow.

The following comes from CNN�

Nearly 51 million households don�t earn enough to afford a monthly budget that includes

housing, food, child care, health care, transportation and a cell phone, according to a study released

Thursday by the United Way ALICE Project.

That�s 43% of households in the United States.

The figure includes the 16.1 million households living in poverty, as well as the 34.7 million

families that the United Way has dubbed ALICE � Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed.

This group makes less than what�s needed �to survive in the modern economy.�

If 43 percent of all Americans cannot even afford �the basics�, what does that say

about the true state of the U.S. economy?

Of course the biggest reason why so many American families are struggling is the lack of good

jobs.

In America today, 66 percent of all jobs pay less than 20 dollars an hour.

66 percent.

Just let that sink in for a minute.

You cannot support a middle class family on 20 dollars an hour.

As a result, many Americans are working more than one job, and in many households both

the mother and the father are working more than one job.

Housing costs account for the biggest item in most family budgets, and the fact that

housing costs have just continued to soar is putting a huge amount of financial stress

on hard working families.

Just today we learned that there is a tremendous rush to buy homes as mortgage rates rise rapidly�

Today, according to the latest Freddie Mac mortgage rates report, after plateauing in

recent weeks, mortgage rates reversed course and reached a new high last seen eight years

ago as the 30-year fixed mortgage rate edged up to 4.61% matching the highest level since

May 19, 2011.

But while the highest mortgage rates in 8 years are predictably crushing mortgage refinance

activity, they appears to be having the opposite effect on home purchases, where there is a

sheer scramble to buy, and sell, houses.

As Bloomberg notes, citing brokerage Redfin, the average home across the US that sold last

month went into contract after a median of 36 only days on the market � a record speed

in data going back to 2010.

If you will remember, we witnessed a very similar pattern just before the subprime mortgage

meltdown in 2008.

History is repeating itself, and we never seem to learn from our past mistakes.

Housing prices in some cities are absolutely obscene right now, and many working families

find themselves completely priced out of the market.

That has some people asking one very simple question�

Many San Francisco renters I met while reporting an articleon affordable housing lotteries

had responded to the region�s housing crisis by putting up with great discomfort: They

crammed in with family; they split apartments with strangers.

Some even lived out of their cars.

Why, lots of readers wanted to know, didn�t they simply move away instead?

Yes, some people are moving, and this is something that I plan to do an article about very soon.

But for most hard working families, moving across the country simply is not an option.

Moving out of state is very expensive, it can be very difficult to find a similar job

in an entirely new area, and many families are very dependent on the social networks

where they currently live�

People who struggle financially often have valuable social networks � family to help

with child care, acquaintances who know of jobs.

The prospect of dropping into, say, Oklahoma or Georgia would mean doing without the good

income and the social support.

Those intangible connections that keep people in places with bad economiesalso keep people

in booming regions where the rent is too high.

In the end, moving is just not an option for a lot of people.

We need to structure our economic system so that it works for all Americans � not just

a few.

Unfortunately, it is probably going to take another major crisis before people are ready

for such a restructuring.

And such a crisis may not be that far away.

In fact, even Pope Francis is now warning about the dangers of derivatives�

In a sweeping critique of global finance released by the Vatican on Thursday, the Holy See singled

out derivatives including credit-default swaps for particular scorn.

�A ticking time bomb,� the Vatican called them.

The unusual rebuke � derivatives rarely reach the level of religious doctrine � is

in keeping with Francis�s skeptical view of unbridled global capitalism.

�The market of CDS, in the wake of the economic crisis of 2007, was imposing enough to represent

almost the equivalent of the GDP of the entire world.

The spread of such a kind of contract without proper limits has encouraged the growth of

a finance of chance, and of gambling on the failure of others, which is unacceptable from

the ethical point of view,� the Vatican said in the document.

I have written about derivatives extensively in the past, and Pope Francis is 100 percent

correct when he says that they are a ticking time bomb which could absolutely devastate

the global financial system at any moment.

We don�t know exactly when it will happen, but we do know that such a crisis is coming

at some point.

Sadly, most of the population is completely asleep, and they will be completely blindsided

by the coming crisis when it does finally arrive.

For more infomation >> Nearly 51 Million Households In The United States 'Can't Afford Basics Like Rent And Food' - Duration: 7:16.

-------------------------------------------

F-15E Strike Eagle ⚔️ US Multirole Strike FIGHTER - Duration: 4:30.

The McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) F-15E Strike Eagle is an American all-weather multirole

strike fighter designed in the 1980s for long-range, high speed interdiction without relying on

escort or electronic-warfare aircraft.

Interesting facts The F-15 made its first flight nearly 43 years

ago, on July 27th, 1972.

It's one of the most successful modern-era fighters, with over 100 aerial combat victories.It's

also had 0 aerial combat losses, giving it a perfect record.

The Eagle can be armed with combinations of four different air-to-air weapons: AIM-7F/M

Sparrow missiles or AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles on its lower fuselage corners, AIM-9L/M Sidewinder

or AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles on two pylons under the wings, and an internal M61 Vulcan 20 millimeter

(0.79 in) Gatling gun in the right wing root.

Design The F-15E prototype was a modification of

the two-seat F-15B.

The F-15E, despite its origins, includes significant structural changes and much more powerful

engines.

The aft fuselage was designed to incorporate the more powerful engines with advanced engine

bay structures and doors.

The advanced structures utilized Superplastic forming and diffusion bonding technologies.

The back seat is equipped for a weapon systems officer to work the new air-to-ground avionics.

The WSO uses multiple screens to display information from the radar, electronic warfare, or Thermographic

cameras, monitor aircraft or weapons status and possible threats, select targets, and

use an electronic moving map to navigate.

Two hand controls are used to select new displays and to refine targeting information.

Displays can be moved from one screen to another, chosen from a menu of display options.

Unlike earlier two-place jets, whose back seat lacked flying controls, the back seat

of the F-15E cockpit is equipped with its own stick and throttle so the WSO can take

over flying, albeit with reduced visibility.

To extend its range, the F-15E is fitted with two conformal fuel tanks, that hug the fuselage.

These produce lower drag than conventional underwing/underbelly drop tanks.

They carry 2,800 liters of fuel, and house six weapons hardpoints in two rows of three

in tandem.

The Strike Eagle's tactical electronic warfare system (TEWS) integrates all countermeasures

on the craft: radar warning receivers radar jammer, radar, and chaff/flare dispensers

are all tied to the TEWS to provide comprehensive defense against detection and tracking.

This system includes an externally mounted ALQ-131 ECM pod, which is carried on the centerline

pylon when required.

Specifications (F-15E) Crew: 2 (Pilot and weapon systems officer)

Powerplant: 2 × Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220 or −229 afterburning turbofans

Performance Maximum speed: 3,017 km/h

Combat radius: 1,270 km Ferry range: 3,900 km with conformal fuel

tank and three external fuel tanks Service ceiling: 18,200 m

Rate of climb: 254+ m/s

Armament Guns: 1× 20 mm (0.787 in) M61A1 Vulcan 6-barreled

Gatling cannon, 500 rounds of either M-56 or PGU-28 ammunition

Hardpoints: 2 wing pylons, fuselage pylons, bomb racks on CFTs with a capacity of 23,000

lb (10,400 kg) of external fuel and ordnance.

For more infomation >> F-15E Strike Eagle ⚔️ US Multirole Strike FIGHTER - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

Fox News Sunday: Mnuchin says US has deal with China to cut trade deficit - Duration: 10:52.

China is showing some signs of compromise and talks with the US but

heading off a trade war that has kept the global markets on edge is still far

from a done deal joining us now president Trump's point

man in the negotiations Treasury secretary Stephen minuchin mr. secretary

welcome back to Fox News Sunday thank you it's great to be here with you after

two long days of talks Thursday and Friday where are we on the one hand on

China agreeing to buy 200 billion dollars more of us goods in return for

the us dropping tariffs on a hundred and fifty billion dollars of Chinese goods

well Chris um I'm pleased to report that we've made very meaningful progress and

we agreed on a framework which is important to understand and the

framework includes their agreement to substantially reduce the trade deficit

by increasing their purchases of goods we also discussed very important

structural issues that they're gonna make in their economy to make sure that

we have a fair ability to compete there and also protections about technology

which have been very important to the president but China and one of the big

things the president has said is he wants them to reduce the deficit by two

hundred billion dollars by two hundred billion dollars more of us goods they

reportedly refused to agree to that specific target there's nothing about a

specific target in the statement one have they refused to agree to a target

and is there still the possibility of a trade war well Chris we're putting the

trade we're on hold so right now we are we have agreed to put the tariffs on

hold while we try to execute the framework the president has been very

clear since the first meeting with President Xi and mar-a-lago that it we

are going to reduce the trade deficit we have an agreement with China that they

will substantially agree to it I would just comment that ultimately these are

not government to government transactions it's not a giant purchase

order with us we are immediately going to follow this up with secretary Ross

going there with very hard commitments in agriculture where we expect to see a

very big increase 35 to 40 percent increases in agriculture this year

in energy doubling the energy purchases I think that you could see 50 60 billion

dollars a year of energy purchases over the next three to five years but and

strategically that's very important for us and very important for them but but

just to lock down two points there one no specific target of 200 billion

dollars Chris we have specific targets I'm not going to publicly disclose what

they are they go industry by industry and as I said not only do we have

targets but ultimately this is about industry being able to have hard

contracts and deliver these goods and as far as the president's threat first of

50 billion dollars in tariffs on Chinese goods and a hundred and fifty billion

dollars those are all on hold they are and the president had a very productive

meeting with the vice premier in the Oval Office with all of us in the vice

president he heard these commitments himself and he can always decide to put

the tariff back on if China doesn't go through with their commitments now

president Trump shocked a lot of people this week when he tweeted this let's put

it up on the screen President Xi of China and I are working together to give

massive Chinese front company ZTE a way to get back into business fast too many

jobs in China lost the Trump administration has banned US companies

from selling components to ZTE the president indicated that perhaps he

would be willing to end that ban which resulted in this exchange take a look

President Xi asked me to look at it I said I would look at it but anything we

do with ZTE is always it's just a small component of the overall deal president

Trump bemoans too many jobs in China lost what about American jobs now the

issue with ZTE is that they violated our sanctions for selling goods to Iran and

North Korea is ZTE part of these create trade talks and is president Trump

willing to relax the ban on US companies selling components to ZTE so Chris I

don't know why anybody's surprised about this so let me give you the facts

President Xi asked President Trump to look into this that's not a surprise

President Trump often asks other leaders to look into

things that are important to our companies the president asked secretary

Ross to look into it okay and that's what secretary Ross this is an

enforcement issue it's not a trade issue we didn't agree to any quid pro quo and

secretary Ross will make sure that in for the enforcement issue is in but in

and in a way that's good for American companies and I'm not going to go

through the discussions on the enforcement issue that was completely

independent of our trade negotiations but we just had the Sun bite of

President Trump saying it's a small component of the overall deal he seems

to be linking ZTE with the trade talks again the president

asked us to look into it as part of the delegation and that's what we did I can

assure you and you know I'm very involved in all the sanctions issues

myself I can assure you that whatever changes we make to the enforcement issue

on ZTE we will be protecting American technology American jobs and make sure

that the secretary is comfortable with enforcement this is but this is an

enforcement issue and I can assure you the president wants us to be very tough

on ZTE and all he did was ask the secretary to look into this okay

president Trump also suggested that that President Xi Chinese President Xi may be

using his leverage with Kim jong-un relative to a summit to get a better

trade deal with the u.s. take a look it could very well be that he's influencing

Kim jong-un we'll see what happens meaning the president of China President

Xi could be influencing Kim jong-un now the president has suggested before that

if she is helpful with regard to North Korea then he the president Trump might

go easier on China on a trade deal is the whole issue of a Trump Kim summit

and president she's conceivable role in that is that part of trade talks well it

is only part of trade talks in the sense of I had very direct conversations with

the Vice Premier because you I'm responsible for sanctions and I have

a commitment from them that they are going to continue to enforce the

sanctions that are in place and this is very important and China has the same

objective as we do they want to get rid of the nuclear weapons so we're not

going easier on China and the trade talks to try to get she's helped for a

summit I don't think we're going easy on the trade talks at all I think for the

first time ok many presidents haven't dealt with this issue president Trump's

dealt with this issue he threatened to put on a hundred and fifty billion of

tariffs we have a very good framework agreement that's not just about buying

goods it's about structural changes it's about lowering tariffs China has

committed to lower tariffs on many things and make structural changes and

protect our technology so these are very important issues for the US economy and

now we're going to make sure that this gets implemented all right as if you

didn't have enough on your plate there's also NAFTA our negotiations of the

effort to renegotiate a trade deal with Canada and Mexico and there are reports

or speculation that prospects for a deal are diminishing after the administration

missed a deadline this past week that had been set by House Speaker Paul Ryan

for getting a deal done what are the chances that NAFTA will be renegotiated

and it'll be passed by Congress this year the president's more determined to

have a good deal than he's worried about any deadlines so whether we pass it in

this Congress or when we pass it in the new Congress the president is determined

that we renegotiate NAFTA that's something we're doing I can tell you

I've been in contact with the finance ministers in both Canada and Mexico

president Trump and Trudeau had a very good conversation last week as

ambassador late Houser said we're still far apart but we're working every day to

renegotiate this agreement and that's what we're focused on so you're

suggesting the president is not setting any kind of deadline and might be

willing to let this spill over into 2019 I'm not saying he's willing to let it

spill over okay he has all his alternatives I'm just saying right now

we are focused on negotiating a good deal and we're not focused on specific

deadlines I can tell you that and Starlite Hauser and others are still

working around the clock on these negotiations with Canada and Mexico

we're far apart but our objective is still to get a deal

secretary minuchin thank you thanks for your time you've got a lot on your plate

we're very busy don't forget Iran sanctions which were also very focused

on Chris I actually wanted to ask you about that please come back and we'll

discuss that as well

you

For more infomation >> Fox News Sunday: Mnuchin says US has deal with China to cut trade deficit - Duration: 10:52.

-------------------------------------------

Hundreds gather for US Sen. Daniel K. Akaka's celebration of life at Kawaihao Church - Duration: 2:58.

For more infomation >> Hundreds gather for US Sen. Daniel K. Akaka's celebration of life at Kawaihao Church - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS Out Of Iran - EU Commitment To Nuclear Deal Without US - Duration: 4:13.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS Out Of Iran - EU Commitment To Nuclear Deal Without US - Duration: 4:13.

-------------------------------------------

China agrees to buy more U.S. goods to reduce trade imbalance - Duration: 0:59.

After series of high-level talks on bilateral trade in Washington this week, China and the

U.S. say they've agreed to work together to reduce the multibillion-U.S.-dollar trade

imbalance... as China increases its purchase of American goods and services.

According to the joint statement Saturday, China will be significantly increasing purchases

of U.S. goods and services, notably in the agriculture and energy sectors... to meet

its growing consumption needs,... and this is expected to help support growth and employment

in the U.S. Details on how much the imbalance will be

reduced have not been clarified.

But the move will lower concerns of a brewing trade war between the world's two largest

economies... as the two countries have been slapping tariffs on each others' goods and

services ever since the Trump administration took a hard line against China, arguing it

has stolen intellectual property.

For more infomation >> China agrees to buy more U.S. goods to reduce trade imbalance - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

US Congress Proposes Spending $10 Million to Look for ETs - Duration: 3:53.

US Congress Proposes Spending $10 Million to Look for ETs

BY Paul Seaburn

There�s only one way to know for certain if Congress is behind something � if it

opens its wallet (well, our wallet) and pays for it.

Congress has proposed a new �National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act

of 2018� bill and buried in its 53 pages is a recommendation to spend $10 million on

the �search for technosignatures, such as radio transmissions� per year for the next

two fiscal years.

This is the first time in 25 years that Congress has considered using tax dollars to search

for extraterrestrial intelligence.

Those who believe the US government (or any government) has already been in contact with

� and is possibly working with � aliens will wonder why it would be spending money

for something it has already done.

OK, governments do that all the time � it�s called �keeping your constituents happy.�

But why suddenly spend money again on SETI?

Is this a coverup or a distraction?

�You need to remember that this is an authorization bill, not an appropriations bill.

Even if it passes, the appropriators may not provide any SETI funding in their bill.

But if they do, that would be a very big deal.� That�s astronomer Jill Tarter, the former

director of the SETI Institute and inspiration for Ellie Arroway in Carl Sagan�s novel

�Contact� and played in the movie by Jodie Foster, explaining to Live Science what kids

would already know if they still watched Schoolhouse Rock�s �I�m Just a Bill.� As someone

who has fought all her life for funding, Tarter is obviously excited about the possibility

of getting $20 million from the government.

But what are the REAL chances of the bill being passed and SETI getting the money?

The answer starts with the sponsor of the bill � Texas congressional representative

Lamar Smith.

That booing and hissing you hear when his name is mentioned comes from those who know

he�s the Head of the House Science Committee and a climate change denier who has taken

contributions from the oil and gas industries.

On the positive side (most politicians really do have both sides), Smith has an interest

in astronomy and is willing to put his name on a bill that actually spends money on NASA

� not exactly a popular cause in Washington these days.

However (there�s always a �however�), Smith is retiring at the end of his term and

will not run for re-election in 2018.

Knowing he won�t be around to fight for it, is Smith sponsoring this bill just for

show?

Also, this comes at the same time President Trump�s administration ended funding for

NASA�s Carbon Monitoring System (CMS) which tracked carbon dioxide and its role in � you

guessed it � climate change.

If this is a serious proposal to fund NASA in future attempts at communications with

ETs, that�s great.

But is it?

Why is SETI funding being proposed to a Congress and administration that is clearly not a fan

of the parts of NASA that have to do with the planet we live on?

Is this a distraction to cover up a contact that has already occurred?

Does this bill have any chance of passing?

Can Jodie Foster help?

For more infomation >> US Congress Proposes Spending $10 Million to Look for ETs - Duration: 3:53.

-------------------------------------------

Moon, Trump to closely coordinate for successful N. Korea, U.S. summit - Duration: 1:40.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in and U.S. President Donald Trump spoke over the phone

earlier this Sunday morning and exchanged ideas about recent threats from North Korea

to cancel its unprecedented summit with the U.S. set for next month.

Our chief Blue House correspondent Moon Connyoung reports.

In just two days they'll be meeting in person in Washington, but perhaps reflecting how

serious and alarming the two leaders are taking the latest about face by North Korea, Presidents

Moon and Trump picked up the phone on this Sunday to ensure they're both committed to

the success of the North Korea, U.S. summit.

That's after the North threatened to pull out of what would be an unprecedented summit

next month.

Seoul's presidential Blue House said the two leaders spoke over the phone for about twenty

minutes and exchanged views on various actions taken by North Korea lately.

"The two leaders will work closely and unwaveringly for the successful hosting of the North Korea,

U.S. summit set for June 12th, including the upcoming South Korea U.S. summit."

Mr. Moon is due to fly out to Washington Monday afternoon for an exclusive one-on-one with

Mr. Trump on Tuesday... where the two will hold private talks with only their interpreters

present.

It will be the first meeting between the two allies since the historic inter-Korean summit

in April and potentially the last before the landmark North Korea, U.S. summit in June.

With Presidents Moon and Trump's pledge Sunday to closely work together on the issue, analysts

expect the leaders to share their deepest thoughts on South Korea, U.S. cooperation

in the denuclearization journey and joint efforts to lead North Korea to the negotiation

table come June 12th.

Moon Connyoung, Arirang News, the Blue House.

For more infomation >> Moon, Trump to closely coordinate for successful N. Korea, U.S. summit - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

The Pakistani exchange student killed in US school shooting│Sabika Sheikh - Duration: 2:41.

Sabika Sheikh

For more infomation >> The Pakistani exchange student killed in US school shooting│Sabika Sheikh - Duration: 2:41.

-------------------------------------------

Competing protests at the Canada-US border - Duration: 2:09.

It's important to be here today to send a very clear message of welcoming to

refugees who are being forced to come across the border irregularly at Roxham Rd.

We're here at Lacolle but many of them

are being held just behind where we are in trailers over there. So we're sending

a very clear message of welcome and also that we demand open borders and then the

other important reason to be here is to block the racist far-right who want to

come here to intimidate refugees and so we're gonna hold this space behind us to

make sure that they're not allowed to spread their hatred here today.

This is just intimidation, they're not gonna do...

Over there, the police are collaborating with them to let them intimidate refugees at the border

Jaggi Singh, you did not win. We did

We won. We are here.

There may be some dangerous people crossing with

not good intentions. Antifa they all look the same they all cheated you know

people racist we're not racist we've never been racist here we love people

that's why we have like a whole bunch of beautiful ethnic restaurants we love to

eat and that's why we have like a beautiful venue so you know we can go

to Festival Nuits d'Afrique and you know we love people that's not what it is about

it's about controlling who comes here and take the right route write your

papers don't don't take a plane from from an African country then go

to the states and then two days after that you're on Roxham Rd. like

what's going on there? There's something not fair you know for people who do we

do it the right way that wants to come and

have a better life.

For more infomation >> Competing protests at the Canada-US border - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

China Resists Trump Deficit Demand, Agrees To Buy More US Goods - Duration: 9:50.

China Resists Trump Deficit Demand, Agrees To Buy More US Goods

by Tyler Durden

Update: as reported earlier on Saturday, the White House indeed confirmed that China has

agreed to purchase more US goods - an agreement that is toothless as i) it is unenforceable

and ii) the only way to validate it is in retrospect - although as noted earlier Washington

didn�t mention the $200BN deficit reduction desired by Donald Trump, suggesting the Trump

admin once again was forced to back down, which we expected with the "elimination" of

Peter Navarro.

"There was a consensus on taking effective measures to substantially reduce the United

States trade deficit in goods with China," the joint US-Chinese statement, issues after

the talks, read.

�To meet the growing consumption needs of the Chinese people and the need for high-quality

economic development, China will significantly increase purchases of United States goods

and services.

This will help support growth and employment in the United States.�

Beijing made another meaningless promise, saying it will amend its laws and regulations

regarding intellectual property, including the Patent Law, in order to encourage more

US purchases.

Not a single Chinese company will buy more US goods as a result of this "change."

The US will now send a team to China to work out the details of the agreement as the sides

vowed to �seek to resolve their economic and trade concerns in a proactive manner.�

In other words, can has been kicked, and a full-blown trade war averted, while the prior

status quo has been extended indefinitely.

After much anticipation that following Trump's ZTE gamble, China may relent in the ongoing

trade war - stoked in no small part by Larry Kudlow's false statement that Beijing had

offered to reduce the US trade deficit by "at least $200 billion" - on Friday the U.S.

and China wrapped up the second day of trade talks, and while Beijing made a vague, unenforceable

commitment to buy more U.S. goods and services, it resisted Trump's core demand that it cut

by more than half the $375BN bilateral trade deficit.

According to the WSJ, while the Chinese were wary of committing to specific purchases - even

though Kudlow also said China would buy more farm products, energy and financial services

- they continue to look for a way to ease trade tensions between the two nations even

if it means with token promises and gestures.

That said, there was one tangible achievement: late on Thursday, Beijing ended an antidumping

probe into imported U.S. sorghum - used for feeding livestock and brewing alcohol - which

had shut down U.S. sales to China.

As a reminder, a month ago, on April 17, China slapped a 179% tariff on US sorghum just hours

after the US banned exports to China's telecom giant, ZTE.

China�s Commerce Ministry said earlier that punitive measures on purchases of the crop

would �affect the cost of living for consumers� in China.

On Friday, China�s Commerce Ministry said it would return the deposits in full while

announcing the end to the probe, essentially removing the penalties on U.S. sorghum producers.

The decision however has wider implications: it is a direct tit-for-tat in the ongoing

discussion over the fate of ZTE sanctions, and as the WSJ wrote previously, the two sides

have been negotiating a deal for the U.S. to ease sanctions on China's blacklisted company.

In exchange, China would end recent restrictions and tariffs on U.S. agricultural products.

Currently the Commerce Department forbids U.S. companies from supplying parts to ZTE.

Mr. Kudlow said that the U.S. was considering easing the punishments.

Alternative sanctions could include changing senior management and board members, Mr. Kudlow

told Fox Business Network.

Such changes �would be very harsh,� he said.

As such, all that was achieved this week was for China to overturn a policy it implemented

a month ago in response to an enforcement action that Trump similarly enacted in mid-April.

At the same time, one of Washington�s central demands - that China reduce its merchandise

trade surplus with the U.S. of $375 billion by at least $200 billion by the end of 2020

- remains unaddressed, even though economists in both nations say that the trade deficit

is affected by investment and savings patterns in both nations, not trade policy, and as

such it isn't feasible to be changed with the stroke of a pen absent dire economic consequences.

Beijing has rejected U.S. demands in the past and has continued to hold firm, said the people

briefed on the talks.

As previously noted, on Friday commentary posted bu Xinhua News Agency said that the

"offer" to cut China's trade surplus with the U.S. was fake news and was "nonexistent"

and that reports that China accepted the U.S. demand to narrow the trade gap are �purely

a misreading." also known as fake news.

The article said that China will "never negotiate under the conditions set by the U.S." and

added that "two sides made progress in areas such as the U.S. allowing more exports of

technology products including semiconductors, as well as lifting restrictions on energy

exports" but stressed that "China won�t make unilateral concessions."

As a result, while both sides have quietly agreed to drop the demand that the deficit

be slashed, the new demand the US has pivoted into is for Beijing to buy more US goods and

services, which is great except for the problem that there is no way to enforce it.

The U.S. Agriculture Department recently asked agriculture companies to come up with a list

of products whose production could be ramped up rapidly for export to China, said a person

following the talks.

At the same time, China put together a list of high-tech products that are barred by U.S.

export controls for sale to China but are allowed by other nations.

Beijing argues that if the U.S. would ease the export controls on these items, it would

purchase more from the U.S., the person briefed on the matters said.

Even so, some U.S. officials believe, the additional Chinese purchases would only total

$50 billion to $60 billion in the next year or two, far short of the U.S. goal.

Meanwhile, as trade discussions continue, the escalating trade war is starting to bite

as growing tensions start hurting businesses in both countries.

U.S. goods, from sorghum and soybeans to cars, have faced growing hurdles when entering China,

while a U.S. order banning American companies from selling components to ZTE threatens to

cripple the telecommunication-equipment producer and other state- owned Chinese companies,

potentially resulting in the one thing Beijing fears the most: rising unemployment.

The WSJ also had some more details on the member of the Chinese delefation, including

the country's Vice Premier Liu He, who has been rapidly rising in China's power ranks

and is seen as China's shadow power broker to the world, and who impressed Washington

officials, said Kudlow, calling Liu a �smart guy, a market guy,� in a brief interview

with White House reporters.

He said Mr. Liu met with President Trump on Thursday in the Oval Office and gave �an

excellent presentation� involving reductions in Chinese tariffs and other measures.

Mr. Trump became �much more optimistic than I have ever seen,� said Mr. Kudlow on Fox

Business Network

Ultimately, the fate of the trade war is up to Trump, and the tone he adopts: early this

week, Trump said he would try to make sure ZTE got back in business, which has since

led to a number of conciliatory gestures from Beijing.

China�s antitrust regulators had delayed for months U.S. private-equity firm Bain Capital�s

$18 billion deal for Toshiba Corp.�s memory-chip unit, but on Thursday the Japanese firm said

regulators had allowed the deal to proceed.

Chinese regulators also promised early this week to restart their review of U.S. chip

maker Qualcomm Inc.�s bid for NXP Semiconductors NV, sending the price of NXP stock soaring

and preventing a round of (metaphoric) suicides among the US hedge fund community where NXP

is one of the largest M&A arbs around.

In return for relief on ZTE, China - which is one of the world's biggest importers of

US farm products - would agree to hold back penalties on a variety of U.S. agricultural

products it announced in early April as retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum

exports.

Finally, with the recent "elimination" of Peter Navarro from Trump's inner circle of

advisors, it appears that the trade war with China - which erupted right after Navarro's

unexpected promotion in the Trump administration, and resignation of Gary Cohn - is about to

return to its prior, dormant state as the status quo wins again and US trade relations

with Beijing - for better or worse - remain virtually unchanged.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét